1
ICHS, 12-14 September 2011
* W.J. Buttner, R. Burgess, C. Rivkin, M.B. Post† L. Boon-Brett, G. Black, F. Harskamp, P. Moretto
* National Renewable Energy Laboratory - NREL† Joint Research Centre - Institute for Energy and Transport – JRC IET
~ Hydrogen Safety Sensors ~ Performance under anaerobic conditions
2
ICHS, 12-14 September 2011
1.JRC IET/NREL Collaboration
2.Research rational
3.Sensor performance testing facilities
4.O2 dependence test method
5.Results/observations
6.Conclusions
Outline
3
ICHS, 12-14 September 2011
Collaborators
EC JRC-IET DOE NREL
4
ICHS, 12-14 September 2011
Collaborators
EC JRC-IET DOE NREL
Hydrogen Safety Sensor Hydrogen Safety Sensor Performance EvaluationPerformance Evaluation
End users
Manufacturersdevelopers
SDOsThe ultimate purpose of the sensor test laboratories is to ensure
that sensor technology is available to meet end user needs
5
ICHS, 12-14 September 2011
Hydrogen sensors are a key enabling technology for a safe H2 infrastructure - essential for detecting unwanted H2 releases
Integrated safety designs include design (valves, PRDs, material) & operational (inert purges) elements
Issue: Use of hydrogen sensor in inert atmospheresInert gas purges may alleviate risks, but may deactivate sensors
O2 requirement depends on technology
Results for three technologies presented (complete study on-going and will be presented elsewhere)
Rational
6
ICHS, 12-14 September 2011
O2 Dependence?
Most H2 sensors detection principle require O2:
Catalytic/pellistor Chemical oxidation Electrochemical Electrochemical oxidationMetal oxide Oxygen surface interactionsWork function type Oxygen surface interactionsOptical Oxygen assisted recovery
Some don’t:
Thermal conductivityAcousticThin/ultra-thin film metal resistors
Evaluate influence of oxygen
concentration on sensor output
7
ICHS, 12-14 September 2011
Testing facilities….
EC JRC-IET
DOE NREL
Test chambers conditions:• Temperature • Pressure• Relative Humidity• Gas composition• Gas flow
8
ICHS, 12-14 September 2011
Test protocol
9
ICHS, 12-14 September 2011
Results – CGS (1)
H2 + O2 → H2O + Δ
T = To + ΔTΔT = F ([H2])
Industry standard (e.g., petroleum industry) for combustible safety Signal is ΔR induced by ΔT arising from surface-catalyzed combustion
Oxygen is fundamentally required Remains responsive in depressed oxygen (down to 5% oxygen)
Unresponsive and unstable when operated an aerobically
10
ICHS, 12-14 September 2011
Results – CGS (2)
Anaerobic operation cause irreversible shift in baseline
Oxygen is required for stable repeatable operation
11
ICHS, 12-14 September 2011
Results – TC (1)
Heated thermoresistor Signal is ΔR via ΔT (heat loss) H2 high thermal conductivity No O2 involvement
Response affected by matrix change Net response to H2 unaffected by O2
12
ICHS, 12-14 September 2011
Results – TC (2)
13
ICHS, 12-14 September 2011
Results – TC (3)
Net response to H2 unaffected by [O2] Sensor slightly over estimates [H2] Results comparable Matrix dependence – correctable!
14
ICHS, 12-14 September 2011
Results – PTF (1)
Various platforms exploit Pd (optical, resistance, mass sens.) Fundamentally no O2 requirement; should be verified for each type Protective coating (on some) alleviates Pd susceptibility to poisons
Commercial resistive sensor showed no oxygen dependence Reversible, quantitative consistent response for oxygen levels Slight impact for anaerobic operation
15
ICHS, 12-14 September 2011
Results – PTF (2)
16
ICHS, 12-14 September 2011
Results – PTF (3)
H2 response only negligibly affected by [O2]
Sensor under estimates [H2] Results comparable
17
ICHS, 12-14 September 2011
Conclusions
NREL and JRC laboratories are available for manufacturers, developers, end-users, and SDOs The NREL and JRC laboratories exist to assure that hydrogen sensors are available and
are used properly Topical studies initiated to document sensor use and limitations
Operation of sensors under depressed oxygen Some platforms (e.g., Pd resistance) show negligible impact Some platforms (e.g., TCD) have (compensable?) matrix drift, but invariance with
hydrogen Some platforms (e.g., CGS) incompatible with anaerobic operation
Future direction/additional work Complete survey for EC, MOX, and other platforms Expand for impact of interferences Other “topical” studies in support of SAFE hydrogen infrastructure
18
ICHS, 12-14 September 2011
THANK YOU !
For more information on the sensor test laboratories: NREL: William J. Buttner, Ph.D. +1 303-275-3903
http://www.nrel.gov/hydrogen/facilities_hsl.html JRC/IET: Lois Brett, Ph.D. +31 224-56-5065
http://iet.jrc.ec.europa.eu/ SINTERCOM Sensor Evaluation Report:
http://iet.jrc.ec.europa.eu/content/scientific-publications