Download - 140923 WAPA EFI DropInMeetings boards
WELCOME!
Estes-to-Flatiron Transmission Lines RebuildDrop-in Learning Sessions
(Drop In anytime from 12 pm to 7 pm)
September 23, 2014Estes Park Museum200 Fourth StreetEstes Park, CO
September 24, 2014 Bison Visitor Center
1800 S. County Road 31 Loveland, CO
EIS PROCESS
Alternatives Development
Final EIS and NOA
Draft EIS andDrop-In Learning Sessions
Notice of Intent to Prepare an EIS
Records of Decision
45-Day Comment Period & Public Hearings
Forest Service Objection/Resolution Period
Opportunities for Public Input
WE ARE HERE
Public ScopingApril 17 - August 31, 2012
HOW TO PARTICIPATE
At this meeting:1. Learn about the proposed alternatives;
2. Review the highlights of the DEIS; and
3. Learn about the DEIS public comment period.
After this meetingSend comments to:
Mark Wieringa Western Area Power Administration, A7400 P.O. Box 281213 Lakewood, CO 80228-8213 [email protected]
Attend the Public Open Houses and Public hearings:
October 29th: Rialto Theater, LovelandOctober 30th: Estes Park Conference
Center
EXPA
NDE
D PU
BLIC
INVO
LVEM
ENT
Intro
duc
e an
d d
escr
ibe
the
prop
osed
pro
ject
Des
crib
e pr
ojec
t sch
edul
e,
key
mile
ston
es a
nd
oppo
rtuni
ties f
or p
ublic
in
volv
emen
t
Iden
tify
issue
s for
ana
lysis
in
the
EIS
Rece
ive
publ
ic
com
men
t on
pote
ntia
l opt
ions
an
d a
ltern
ativ
es
scre
enin
g cr
iteria
Publ
ish F
inal
EIS
in
corp
orat
ing
com
men
ts re
ceiv
ed
on th
e D
raft
EIS
Publ
ish R
OD
s
Rece
ive
publ
ic
com
men
t on
the
Dra
ft EI
S
Prov
ide
a fo
rum
for
ques
tions
abo
ut th
e
EIS
Stak
ehol
der I
nter
view
s Pu
blic
Sco
ping
Mee
tings
: A
ugus
t 6/7
, 201
2 En
d of
Sco
ping
Per
iod:
A
ugus
t 31,
201
2
Field
Visi
tsSm
all G
roup
W
orks
hops
Sept
embe
r 201
2
Dra
ft EI
SO
pen
Hous
es +
Pu
blic
Hea
rings
++
+
Pub
lic
Sco
pin
gA
lte
rna
tive
s S
cre
eni
ngP
ubli
c D
raft
EIS
Fina
l EIS
Fore
st S
ervi
ce
Obj
ectio
n Pe
riod
Fina
l E
IS a
nd R
eco
rds
of
De
cisi
on
(RO
D)
Wes
tern
is p
rovi
din
g an
exp
and
ed p
ublic
invo
lvem
ent p
roce
ss fo
r the
Est
es to
Fla
tiron
Tra
nsm
issio
n Lin
es R
ebui
ld, a
s det
aile
d b
elow
.
PROJECT OVERVIEW
Western proposes to rebuild two existing H-frame wood-pole 115-kV transmission lines, totaling about 32 miles long, between Flatiron Reservoir and Estes Park. These lines are over 60 years old. The Alternatives A-C of the proposed project would rebuild aging and deteriorating transmission lines, and reduce the linear miles of transmission line by half. Western’s proposal includes:
• Approximately 16 miles of the existing transmission line would be removed.
• The transmission line would be rebuilt with steel monopole structures replacing the existing wood H-frame structures, in a double-circuit
• Utilizing existing ROW, if possible.• Structure height would increase from 70 feet to up to 105 feet. • ROW would need to be expanded to 110 feet in areas with inadequate
ROW. • Variants A2 and C1 include 2.7 miles of underground construction on
the westernmost portion of the line.
Alternative D rebuilds the two existing transmission lines on separate ROWs. Changes include structure height increasing 5 to 10 feet, expansion of the ROWs as needed, and a reroute around Newell Lake Subdivision.
PURPOSE AND NEED
Western Area Power Administration has determined that the existing lines need to be upgraded and rebuilt.
TRANSMISSION SYSTEMS IN THE UNITED STATES ARE PLANNED, OPERATED AND MAINTAINED TO MEET NORTH AMERICAN ELECTRIC RELIABILITY CORPORATION (NERC) RELIABILITY STANDARDS AND NATIONAL ELECTRICAL SAFETY CODE (NESC) REQUIREMENTS. THESE ORGANIZATIONS ESTABLISH RELIABILITY, SAFETY AND OTHER STANDARDS FOR THE BULK POWER SYSTEM IN THE UNITED STATES.
NESC standards, Western must ensure its facilities:
• meet current safety standards,
• are readily accessible for maintenance and emergencies,
• , and
• are cost effective for its customers.
§̈ ¦70
§̈ ¦25Lo
vela
nd
Fort
Col
lins
Den
ver
Este
s Pa
rk£34
£36Bo
ulde
r
º
O:\Projects\2012\60270261 WAPA_EstesPk_FlatironEIS\06GIS\6.3Layout\Alternatives\Project Area.mxd
Figu
re 1
.2-1
Proj
ect A
rea
Este
s-Fl
atiro
nTr
ansm
issi
on L
ines
Reb
uild
Pro
ject
US 3
6
Pole
Hill
Su
bsta
tion
Mea
dow
dale
R
anch
Pine
woo
d R
eser
voir
Cou
nty
Par
k
Ram
say
Shoc
key
Ope
n S
pace
Pin
ewoo
d R
eser
voir
Ste
war
dshi
p Tr
ust
Chi
mne
y H
ollo
wO
pen
Spa
ce
Roo
seve
lt N
atio
nal F
ores
t
Roo
seve
lt N
atio
nal F
ores
tBl
ue M
ount
ain
Bis
on R
anch
Lake
Est
esEst
es V
alle
yLa
nd T
rust Her
mit
Par
k
Mea
dow
dale
R
anch
Flat
iron
Res
ervo
ir
Roc
ky M
ount
ain
Nat
iona
l Par
k
Flat
iron
Subs
tatio
n
Este
s- P
ole
Hill
(Sou
th L
ine)
Este
s- L
yons
Tap
(Nor
th L
ine)
Flat
iron-
Pol
e H
ill(S
outh
Lin
e)
01
23
0.5
Mile
s
02
41
Kilo
met
ers
1:11
0,00
0
Roa
dsEx
istin
g Tr
ansm
issi
on L
ine
Stu
dy A
rea
Sub
stat
ions
Nor
ther
n C
olor
ado
Wat
er
Con
serv
ancy
Dis
trict
Dep
artm
ent o
f Int
erio
rU
S F
ores
t Ser
vice
Stat
eC
ount
yPr
ivat
e C
onse
rved
Lan
ds
PRO
JEC
T MA
P
MAKE YOUR COMMENTS COUNT
• Be clear, concise and relevant
• Things to comment on: the proposed alternatives, the assessment of the environmental impacts, proposed mitigation.
•
• of most concern, information on resource tradeoffs, information on the relative values
• Include supporting rationale that would aid in reaching a decision
• Reference the name of the Draft EIS and include your name, address, telephone number and
• NEPA isn’t a voting exercise -- don’t simply provide an expression of preference for one alternative versus another
HOW TO COMMENT
Ways to submit your comments:• Orally at the public open houses and hearings
• In writing at the drop-in meetings or public open houses
• E-mailed to:
• Mailed to:
Mark Wieringa Western Area Power Administration, A7400 PO Box 281213 Lakewood, CO 80228-8213
Public Open Houses and Hearing dates:Loveland: October 29th Estes Park: October 30th
Draft EIS comments must be postmarked or received by November 14th, 2014
PRO
POSE
D A
LTER
NA
TIVES
Pole
Hill
Su
bsta
tion
Flat
iron
Subs
tatio
n
The
Not
ch
US 3
6
Varia
nt A
1
New
ell L
ake
View
Sub
divi
sion
Sour
ce: E
sri,
Dig
italG
lobe
,G
eoE
ye, i
-cub
ed, U
SD
A,
USG
S, A
EX
, Get
map
ping
,Ae
rogr
id, I
GN
, IG
P, s
wis
stop
o,
Park
Hill
Subd
ivis
ion
Mea
dow
dale
Hills
Sub
divi
sion
Varia
nt A
1
Sour
ce: E
sri,
Dig
italG
lobe
,G
eoE
ye, i
-cub
ed, U
SD
A,
USG
S, A
EX
, Get
map
ping
,Ae
rogr
id, I
GN
, IG
P, s
wis
stop
o,E
stes
P
ark
Fort
Col
lins
Love
land
O:\Projects\2012\60270261 WAPA EstesPk FlatironEIS\06GIS\6 3Layout\Map3 all alts mxd
Figu
re 2
-1A
ltern
ativ
es fo
r O
verh
ead
Con
stru
ctio
n
Este
s-Fl
atiro
nTr
ansm
issi
on L
ines
Reb
uild
Pro
ject
01
23
0.5
Mile
s
02
41
Kilo
met
ers
1:10
0,00
0
Larim
er C
ount
y
Boul
der C
ount
y
Alte
rnat
ive
B
Mea
dow
dale
R
anch
Roo
seve
lt N
atio
nal F
ores
t
Roo
seve
lt N
atio
nal F
ores
t
Lake
Est
esEste
s Va
lley
Land
Tru
st
Mea
dow
dale
R
anch
Flat
iron
Res
ervo
ir
Her
mitP
ark
Blue
Mou
ntai
n Bi
son
Ran
ch
Pine
woo
d R
eser
voir
Cou
nty
Par
k
Pine
woo
d R
eser
voir
Stew
ards
hip
Trus
tC
him
ney
Hol
low
Ope
n S
pace
NC
WC
D
Sub
stat
ions
Stu
dy a
rea
Roa
ds
300'
buf
fer
Ove
rhea
d C
onst
ruct
ion
(Fol
low
ing
exis
ting
RO
W)
Sta
teC
ount
yP
rivat
e La
ndC
onse
rvat
ion
DO
IU
SFS
Alte
rnat
ive
B
Ove
rhea
d C
onst
ruct
ion
(Off
exis
ting
RO
W)
Alte
rnat
ive
AA
ltern
ativ
e A
Ram
say
Sho
ckey
Ope
n S
pace
Not
e: T
he a
lignm
ent f
or A
ltern
ativ
e D
ove
rlaps
oth
er a
lignm
ents
and
is n
ot v
isib
le fo
r the
ent
ire le
ngth
of t
he a
ltern
ativ
e in
this
map
. Th
e en
d to
end
alig
nmen
t for
Alte
rnat
ive
D is
sho
wn
on F
igur
e 2-
7.
Alte
rnat
ive
DA
ltern
ativ
e C
Varia
nt A
1
Alte
rnat
ive
CA
ltern
ativ
e D
PRO
POSE
D A
LTER
NA
TIVES
Pole
Hill
Su
bsta
tion
Flat
iron
Subs
tatio
n
The
Not
ch
US 3
6
Park
Hill
Subd
ivis
ion
Mea
dow
dale
Hills
Sub
divi
sion
Sour
ce: E
sri,
Dig
italG
lobe
, Geo
Eye
, i-
cube
d, U
SD
A, U
SG
S, A
EX
,G
etm
appi
ng, A
erog
rid, I
GN
, IG
P,sw
isst
opo,
and
the
GIS
Use
rC
omm
unity
Est
es
Par
k
Fort
Col
lins
Love
land
O:\Projects\2012\60270261 WAPA_EstesPk_FlatironEIS\06GIS\6.3Layout\Map 3 Underground.mxd
Figu
re 2
-2A
ltern
ativ
es w
ith U
nder
grou
ndC
onst
ruct
ion
(Var
iant
s A
2 an
d C
1)
Este
s-Fl
atiro
nTr
ansm
issi
on L
ines
Reb
uild
Pro
ject
01
23
0.5
Mile
s
02
41
Kilo
met
ers
1:10
0,00
0
Larim
er C
ount
y
Boul
der C
ount
y
Dep
artm
ent o
f Int
erio
rU
S F
ores
t Ser
vice
Sta
teC
ount
yP
rivat
e C
onse
rved
Land
s
Mea
dow
dale
R
anch
Ram
say
Sho
ckey
Ope
n S
pace
Roo
seve
lt N
atio
nal F
ores
t
Roo
seve
lt N
atio
nal F
ores
t
Lake
Est
esEste
s Va
lley
Land
Tru
st
Mea
dow
dale
R
anch
Flat
iron
Res
ervo
ir
Her
mitP
ark
Varia
nt A
2
Blue
Mou
ntai
n Bi
son
Ran
ch
Pine
woo
d R
eser
voir
Cou
nty
Par
k
Pine
woo
d R
eser
voir
Stew
ards
hip
Trus
tC
him
ney
Hol
low
Ope
n S
pace
300-
foot
buf
fer
Sub
stat
ions
Stu
dy a
rea
Roa
dsO
verh
ead
Con
stru
ctio
n
NC
WC
DU
nder
grou
nd C
onst
ruct
ion
Varia
nt C
1
Varia
nt A
2 (o
ff ex
istin
g R
OW
)Va
riant
C1
(off
exis
ting
RO
W)
Varia
nt C
1 (fo
llow
ing
exis
ting
RO
W)
Varia
nt A
2 (f
ollo
win
g ex
istin
g R
OW
)
POLE
STR
UCTU
RES
115-
kV S
ingl
e C
ircui
t Woo
d P
ole
H-F
ram
e St
ruct
ure
Alte
rnat
ive
D a
nd N
o A
ctio
n
115-
kV D
oubl
e C
ircui
t Sin
gle
Pole
St
and
ard
Ste
el S
truct
ure
Alte
rnat
ives
A, A
1, A
2, B
, C, C
1
115-
kV D
oubl
e C
ircui
t Sin
gle
Pole
St
and
ard
Ste
el S
hort
Stru
ctur
eA
ltern
ativ
es A
, A1,
A2,
B, C
, C1
WHAT’S IN THE EIS?
1. Alternatives Alternatives considered and measures taken to minimize adverse effects
2. Affected EnvironmentDescription of the existing environmental conditions for physical, biological, and human resources.
3. Environmental ImpactsDirect and indirect impacts of each alternative
4. Cumulative ImpactsEnvironmental impacts of the project when added to past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future actions.
ALT
ERN
ATIV
ES D
EVEL
OPM
ENT
01
0.5
Mile
s
Rou
te O
ptio
n Fr
om P
ublic
Sco
ping
EA R
oute
Opt
ion
Exis
ting
RO
W
110'
RO
W
30 ft
. Con
tour
s
Num
ber o
f Con
side
ratio
ns1
Con
side
ratio
n
2 O
verla
ppin
g C
onsi
dera
tions
3 O
verla
ppin
g C
onsi
dera
tions
Stud
y Ar
ea (1
Mile
Buf
fer o
f Exi
stin
g Li
nes)
Este
sPa
rk
Car
ter
Lake
Res
ervo
ir
3634
Cop
yrig
ht:©
200
9 E
SR
I
Rou
ting
Con
side
ratio
ns
Con
side
ratio
ns in
clud
e sl
ope
grea
ter
than
30%
, sen
sitiv
e vi
ewsh
eds,
park
s an
d op
en s
pace
, and
a 6
5 ft
buffe
r aro
und
hom
es.
Este
s - F
latir
on T
rans
mis
sion
Lin
e R
ebui
ld
A
B/C
D
DE
F
G
JK
ALT
ERN
ATIV
ES D
EVEL
OPM
ENT
01
0.5
Mile
s
Rou
te O
ptio
n Fr
om P
ublic
Sco
ping
EA R
oute
Opt
ion
Exis
ting
RO
W
110'
RO
W
30 ft
. Con
tour
s
Num
ber o
f Con
side
ratio
ns1
Con
side
ratio
n
2 O
verla
ppin
g C
onsi
dera
tions
3 O
verla
ppin
g C
onsi
dera
tions
Stud
y Ar
ea (1
Mile
Buf
fer o
f Exi
stin
g Li
nes)
Este
sPa
rk
Car
ter
Lake
Res
ervo
ir
3634
Cop
yrig
ht:©
200
9 E
SR
I
Rou
ting
Con
side
ratio
ns
Con
side
ratio
ns in
clud
e sl
ope
grea
ter
than
30%
, sen
sitiv
e vi
ewsh
eds,
park
s an
d op
en s
pace
, and
a 6
5 ft
buffe
r aro
und
hom
es.
Este
s - F
latir
on T
rans
mis
sion
Lin
e R
ebui
ld
D
G/H
I
L
M
N
PUBLIC INPUT ON ALTERNATIVE SEGMENTS
Segments Carried Forward for Analysis Map Reference Issue Identified During Internal & Public Scoping How proposed alternative or re-route addresses the issue A The existing transmission line ROW limits future
expansion of the Upper Thompson Sanitation District's treatment plant located on BOR land west of Mall Road.
Alternatives A & D propose minor adjustments to the existing alignment of the North Line to avoid conflicts with Sanitation District facility expansion. Alternatives B & C use the southern ROW, and therefore do not constrain facility expansion.
B Strong public preference for siting the ROW for the rebuild in the valley between Mt Olympus and Mt Pisgah.
Alternatives A & D follow the existing alignment of the North Line between Mt Olympus and Mt Pisgah. Variant A1 proposes a new alternate alignment to bring the line through the valley.
C The valley between Mt Olympus and Mt Pisgah is highly visible from the Town of Estes. Crocker Ranch also prefers a southern route across their property.
Alternatives B & C avoid the valley between Mt Olympus and Mt Pisgah by siting the ROW to the south.
D Areas with steep slopes and no (or inadequate) access present challenges for construction and maintenance of the rebuilt line. Areas with steep slopes and poor access include: 1) North Line west of , 2) South Line, south of US 36, 3) South Line west of Pole Hill Substation.
Alternative C avoids these three sections of existing ROW that have steep slopes and poor access.
E Visibility from US 36 Alternative C reduces visibility from US 36. F Meadowdale residents have strong preference for
siting the ROW for the rebuild to the north and/or west of the Meadowdale subdivison.
Alternative A and Variant A1 do not use existing ROW through Meadowdale Subdivision.
G Public comments requested that the transmission line be constructed underground on both the Estes Park and Pinewood Lake ends of the project to reduce effects to recreational and residential viewsheds, and visibility from US 36.
Variants A2 and C1 propose to construct the western end of Alternatives A & C underground. The Alternative A reroute around Newell Lake Subdivision addressed this issue without the added expense of underground construction. Therefore, an underground option is not carried on the east end of the project area.
H Reduce effects to recreational and residential viewsheds at Pinewood Lake (viewshed is to the south).
Alternative A avoids impacts to recreational and residential viewsheds at Pinewood Lake by rerouting the line to the north and east of Newell Lake View Subdivision. Alternatives C & D reduce effects on recreational and residential viewsheds by siting the line to follow Pole Hill Rd on the east side of Pinewood Lake.
I There is inadequate existing ROW through Newell Lake View Subdivision; expansion of existing ROW would require the removal of homes.
All alternatives avoid conflicts with homes in the Newell Lake View Subdivision.
Segments Dismissed from Detailed Analysis Map Reference Reason for Dismissal J Reroute west of Meadowdale Subdivision, on the east slope of Mount Pisgah. This proposed route crossed steep slopes
without any existing access roads, and would be difficult and costly to construct. Road construction across this topography would require excessive cut and fill.
K Reroute to the south side of the northern alignment to avoid an area with steep slopes and poor access west of . This route follows a riparian corridor and is not suitable for siting the transmission line.
L Reroutes far to the south of the southern alignment were suggested during workshops to reduce effects to recreational and residential viewsheds at Pinewood Lake. These reroutes were dismissed because they crossed protected lands, and did not fully address the issue. To more effectively respond to concerns regarding viewshed effects, a reroute to the north and east of Newell Lake View Subdivision (Alternative A) is proposed.
M Reroute along Cottonwood Creek. This reroute would extend from the vicinity of Flatiron Reservoir and follow an alignment to the northwest generally along Cottonwood Creek, rejoining the ROW of the existing North line near Pinewood Lake Dam. This alternative would require several miles of construction through steep terrain with poor access. It was dropped in favor of other alternatives, specifically Alternatives A, C, and D that accomplish an avoidance of the Pinewood Lake viewshed and adjacent subdivisions in a more direct and effective manner.
N A reroute that followed a gas pipeline between the northern and southern alignment on the east end of the project area was dismissed. The reroute was suggested as a means to collocate linear infrastructure. However, the reroute fails to effectively address other scoping issues raised, and for that reason was dismissed from further consideration.