Download - 2011 presentation jay butler
![Page 1: 2011 presentation jay butler](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042816/559b7b141a28abd3248b4705/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
realty.wpcarey.asu.edu
![Page 2: 2011 presentation jay butler](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042816/559b7b141a28abd3248b4705/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Single-family 1.2 million homes Townhouse/condos 150,000 units Apartments 340,000 units
Retail 148 million Sq.Ft. Office 63 million Sq.Ft. Industrial 229 million Sq.Ft.
![Page 3: 2011 presentation jay butler](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042816/559b7b141a28abd3248b4705/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Success built on failure
Game of checkers
After slow start, local economy and real estate market should structurally strengthen throughout the year.
![Page 4: 2011 presentation jay butler](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042816/559b7b141a28abd3248b4705/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
To build capital for education, retirement and lifestyle (middle-class investment)
Money was cheap and available
What have you done for me lately.
Hyped information and guidance
![Page 5: 2011 presentation jay butler](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042816/559b7b141a28abd3248b4705/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Just because the bottom is found does not mean that recovery is imminent. ◦ The Titanic found bottom.
Recovery will not be even or include everyone.
What is the driving force for recovery? What will recovery look like?
![Page 6: 2011 presentation jay butler](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042816/559b7b141a28abd3248b4705/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Census◦ Growth?◦ Demographic
Role of Housing Ownership—American Dream?◦ Tax deduction◦ Secondary market◦ Buy vs. rent Mobility Affordability
![Page 7: 2011 presentation jay butler](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042816/559b7b141a28abd3248b4705/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Housing market◦ Value recovery◦ Financial services◦ Over hang of homes for sale, vacant and foreclosed
Commercial real estate◦ Increasing foreclosures◦ Loss of tenants◦ Loss of revenue
![Page 8: 2011 presentation jay butler](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042816/559b7b141a28abd3248b4705/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Economic and job (income recovery)
International, Federal and State deficits ◦ Revenues vs. expenses
![Page 9: 2011 presentation jay butler](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042816/559b7b141a28abd3248b4705/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Immigration Infrastructure Education Alternative fuels Sustainable development
![Page 10: 2011 presentation jay butler](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042816/559b7b141a28abd3248b4705/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Success built on failure Deal is the name of the game Understand closely◦ Condition of property◦ Condition of neighborhood ◦ Potential demand◦ Competition
Idea(s) might not be unique Look at trend
![Page 11: 2011 presentation jay butler](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042816/559b7b141a28abd3248b4705/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Homes are an investment◦ Owner/occupant investor◦ Owner/landlord investor◦ Owner/speculator investor
Motivation◦ Long-term: self-sufficiency◦ Short-term: lifestyle enhancement
Return◦ Income: Rental, Value-added, Financing◦ Appreciation
![Page 12: 2011 presentation jay butler](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042816/559b7b141a28abd3248b4705/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Stricter underwriting Satisfied homeowner Income concerns Rental vs. owning Consumer confidence Low or no equity—difficulty to sell
![Page 13: 2011 presentation jay butler](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042816/559b7b141a28abd3248b4705/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
2000 2010Population 3,251,876 4,192,887
White Only 66 percent 60 percent
Hispanic 25 percent 30 percent
Black 3.5 percent 4.6 percent
Asian 2.0 percent 3.2 percent
![Page 14: 2011 presentation jay butler](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042816/559b7b141a28abd3248b4705/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
White Hispanic Only
Growth (941,011) 34 percent 45 percent
18+ (74%) 80 percent 62 percent
![Page 15: 2011 presentation jay butler](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042816/559b7b141a28abd3248b4705/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
YEAR TOTAL ABSOLUTE PERCENT CHANGE CHANGE
2008 1,868,000 (47,000) - 2.4
2009 1,841,850 (26,150) -1.4
2010 1,803,170 (38,680) -2.1
2011F 1,819,400 16,230 0.9
2012F 1,848,510 29,110 1.6
![Page 16: 2011 presentation jay butler](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042816/559b7b141a28abd3248b4705/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Apr Mar Apr Change Change
2010 2011 2011 Yr to Yr Mo to Mo
Total Nonfarm 1,703.8 1,704.3 1,714.8 11.0 10.5
Total Private 1,459.7 1,464.5 1,474.8 15.1 10.3Goods
Producing 195.9 191.4 194.5 -1.4 3.1
Service-Providing 1,507.9 1,512.9 1,520.3 12.4 7.4
0.0
Construction 82.7 77.8 80.4 -2.3 2.6
Manufacturing 110.2 110.6 111.1 0.9 0.5
Retail Trade 205.6 205.9 206.5 0.9 0.6
Health Care 194.5 205.0 206.4 11.9 1.4
Tourism 152.8 156.4 157.9 5.1 1.5
Education 101.2 100.1 100.3 -0.9 0.2
Business Services 272.4 262.6 262.9 -9.5 0.3
![Page 17: 2011 presentation jay butler](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042816/559b7b141a28abd3248b4705/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Instrument May May 2010 2011
30 year Mortgage 5.0% 4.6% 1-year Index 0.37 0.19 Prime Rate 3.25 3.25 10-year Treasury 3.42 3.46
![Page 18: 2011 presentation jay butler](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042816/559b7b141a28abd3248b4705/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Permits Maricopa Pinal Pima o 2011 ytd 1,323 184 185o 2010 5,612 1,500 1,000o 2009 6,355 2,130 1,865o 2008 10,348 4,027 2,630 o 2007 21,882 8,147 3,715o 2006 27,976 10,788 8,115o 2005 43,256 18,191 11,035 o 2004 48,136 11,495 9,585 o 2003 39,652 6,730 8,010o 2002 34,309 4,433 6,500
![Page 19: 2011 presentation jay butler](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042816/559b7b141a28abd3248b4705/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Optimistic Pessimism Consensus
2010 Actual: 7,112
2011 16,900 6,000 12,260
2012 27,800 10,000 18,290
Source: Greater Phoenix Blue Chip
![Page 20: 2011 presentation jay butler](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042816/559b7b141a28abd3248b4705/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Major issue is competition with foreclosed homes
Market simulation: Entry level Infill Age restricted Green
![Page 21: 2011 presentation jay butler](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042816/559b7b141a28abd3248b4705/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Area First Qtr. First Qtr.
2010 2011
Maricopa County $ 227,250 $221,900
Peoria 264,440 210,000
South Phoenix 155,700 144,180
Surprise 167,990 167,840
Gilbert 227,025 218,130
Avondale 149,615 146,640
Goodyear 209,315 219,995
![Page 22: 2011 presentation jay butler](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042816/559b7b141a28abd3248b4705/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Area First Qtr. First Qtr. 2010 2011
Pinal County $133,100 $163,500
Apache Junction 162,585 167,920
Casa Grande 114,000 124,355
Maricopa 120,370 124,355
Queen Creek 139,900 150,235
![Page 23: 2011 presentation jay butler](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042816/559b7b141a28abd3248b4705/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
SALES ACTIVITY Maricopa Pinal 2011 27,950 4,080◦ 2010 106,975 12,765 ◦ 2009 112,725 12,140◦ 2008 81,700 9,985◦ 2007 54,570 3,580◦ 2006 67,035 3,860◦ 2005 110,835 6,110
MEDIAN PRICE 2010 $142,000 102,500◦ 2009 140,000 105,000◦ 2008 186,000 134,000◦ 2007 255,000 193,500◦ 2006 260,600 205,000◦
![Page 24: 2011 presentation jay butler](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042816/559b7b141a28abd3248b4705/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Area First Qtr. First Qtr. 2010 2011
Maricopa County $145,500 $130,050
Peoria 165,245 149,665
S. Phoenix 114,750 96,840
Maryvale 64,395 52,000
Surprise 139,125 125,000
Mesa 135,675 119,000
Glendale 119,000 100,000
![Page 25: 2011 presentation jay butler](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042816/559b7b141a28abd3248b4705/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Median Market Market Market Sales Price Share Share
Share (%) (%)
Total 10,265 125,000Foreclosed 3,745 126,645 36Traditional 6,520 125,000 64
REO 2,610 114,465 4025
Foreclosure related 6,355 62
![Page 26: 2011 presentation jay butler](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042816/559b7b141a28abd3248b4705/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
2008 2009
2010
Maricopa County 3.3% 3.8% 3.9%
Pinal County 4.8 5.3 5.6
![Page 27: 2011 presentation jay butler](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042816/559b7b141a28abd3248b4705/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
2008 2009 2010
Maricopa 7.6% 7.3% 9.4% Casa Grande 2.7 2.6 4.4 Apache Junction 7.1 8.7 9.3 Maryvale 9.3 8.9 7.8 Gilbert 2.9 3.5 4.8 Surprise 6.5 7.3 6.9 Avondale 8.0 8.0 6.9 Buckeye 11.6 15.9 14.6
![Page 28: 2011 presentation jay butler](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042816/559b7b141a28abd3248b4705/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Areas 2009 2010 United States $172,100 $176,900 Phoenix 137,000 144,700 San Diego 350,500 392,800Las Vegas 142,900 142,300Dallas 140,500 134,700Atlanta 123,500 122,700Source: NAR
![Page 29: 2011 presentation jay butler](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042816/559b7b141a28abd3248b4705/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Area First Qtr. First Qtr. 2010 2011
Maricopa County 156 178
Peoria 159 178
Avondale 225 251
Surprise 159 180
Glendale 190 229
Chandler 154 175
![Page 30: 2011 presentation jay butler](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042816/559b7b141a28abd3248b4705/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Permits◦ 2011 337o 2010 353 o 2009 561o 2008 1,085o 2007 7,203o 2006 6,187
Median New Unit Sales Price◦ 2010 201,960◦ 2009 169,475◦ 2008 170,875◦ 2007 245,155
![Page 31: 2011 presentation jay butler](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042816/559b7b141a28abd3248b4705/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Sales Activity◦ 2011 ytd 4,560◦ 2010 16,955◦ 2009 13,735 ◦ 2008 9,420◦ 2007 11,550
Median Resale Home Price◦ 2011 $ 85,000 ◦ 2010 95,000 ◦ 2009 108,000◦ 2008 150,000◦ 2007 179,000
![Page 32: 2011 presentation jay butler](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042816/559b7b141a28abd3248b4705/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Area First Qtr. First Qtr. 2010 2011
Maricopa County $100,040 $ 85,000
Peoria 77,280 74,865
North Scottsdale 170,840 156,990
South Scottsdale 125,000 107,520
Downtown 99,390 102,550
Union Hills 110,000 81,833
Glendale 54,900 46,000
![Page 33: 2011 presentation jay butler](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042816/559b7b141a28abd3248b4705/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
UNITS AUTHORIZED◦ 2011 ytd 4◦ 2010 408◦ 2009 637◦ 2008 6,365 ◦ 2007 6,676
◦ 2000’s 51,680 ◦ 1990s 51,608 ◦ 1980s 137,436