By: Josefina B. Bitonio
OIC CDA Regional Diector
TAS delivered and 94 % received a rating of good or better within 3 days after request. The target for TAS is 80%.
1
Provincial
PCU LU
7 Regl
winners
4
National
Citations
1
National
winner
Nueva Segovia consortium of Cooperatives
Best Performing Cooperative Federation
Theme : Membership Expansion
City Development Office Laoag City
Best Performing Local Government Units –
Cooperative Development Offices – Theme
Exemplary Performance in Providing Support
Services to Cooperatives
CDC of Laoag City
Best Performing Cooperative
Development Council- As effective
coordinating body in the implementation
of various cooperative programs and
projects.
Ms. Salud Puzon LCCrC
Most Outstanding Cooperative Leader
Sacred
LULA MPC
Most Outstanding Cooperatives
Medium scale Category
Sacred Heart Savings Cooperative
Most Outstanding Cooperatives
Large Scale Category
GLEDCO
Most Outstanding Cooperatives
Large Scale Category
3rd Place –NSCC
No. of
Accredited
External
Auditors
No. of
Accredited
Training
Provider
No. of
Accredited
Mediator/
Conciliator
Pang 9 1
LU 7 1
I.Sur 1 2 15
I.Norte 2 1
19 5 15
Registration
Monitoring
Enforcement
Jan - October
New Cooperatives 45
Amendments 37
No. of Cooperatives Inspected
616
No. of Inspection Reports Submitted
100%
No. of Inspection Report Transmitted to Cooperatives
100%
Cooperative Annual Progress Report
692
Audited Financial Statement 692
Performance Audit Report 692
Social Audit Report 692
List of Officers And Trainings Attended
692
Regular Special
60% of non compliant
cooperatives are given sanctions and directives
45% Notice of Penalty;
SCOs
MC Number
Title
2014 -01 Regulatory relief for cooperatives affected by 2013 fortuitous events
2014 -02 Clarificatory issuance on the five year consecutive year limit rule in the engagement of cooperative external auditors (Baseline 2009)
MC Number Title
2014 -03 Implement the collection of legal research fund fees for registration and amendment, petitions and complaints imposed by the CDA
An LRF fee in an amount equivalent to one percent (1%)
of the fee imposed but in no case lower than ten (10)
pesos shall be collected on every fee for all applications
for registration and amendment, petitions and complaints
imposed by the Authority in the exercise and discharge of
its regulatory functions
MC Number
Title
2013-18 Amended 2014-04
Required ownership of units by transportation service cooperatives To comply within 5 years from the date of registration/amendment to comply with the minimum number of units of cooperatively owned Tricycle, jeepney, taxi, AUV, FX, Van = 5 units Mini Bus/Truck = 2 units Ship, Ferry Boat, Motorized banca = 1 unit
MC Number Title
2014 -05 Guidelines in the implementation of web based Cooperative Annual Progress Report Information System
1142 1269 1334
1030
2010 2011 2012 2013
Operating Cooperatives
80 73 92
198
2010 2011 2012 2013
Small Scale Category
26
38 44 43
2010 2011 2012 2013
Medium
5
8
11 11
2010 2011 2012 2013
Large
1 SACDECO 785,525,880.37
2 Tubao Credit Coop 653,878,179.73
3 Sacred Heart Savings Coop 376,292,786.19
4 Calasiao Plant and RCE MPC 329,951,675.59
5 GLEDCO 306,808,285.38
6 Lingayen Catholic Credit coop 249,268,201.22
7 Suyo MPC 125,508,776.53
8 Metro Vigan Coop Hosp 123,731,731.00
9
Fatima (Vigan) Multi Purpose
Cooperative 118,337,349.00
10 San Joaquin MPC 112,354,664.00
11
Coliling Farmers and Savings
Coop 110,391,186.00
1 Calasiao Plant and RCE
MPC
296,804,353.00
2 Tubao Credit Coop
218,810,559.90
3 SACDECO
139,892,272.91
4 GLEDCO
112,601,000.00
5 Lingayen Catholic Credit
Coop 111,576,298.31
Name of Coop No. of Branches
No. of Satellite
No. of Laboratory Coop
1. NSCC 14 1
2. SACDECO 11 3
3. Sacred Hearst Savings Coop 11 1
4. St Lucy MPC 4
5. Sto. Domingo MPC 4
6. Suyo MPC 3
7. La Union MPC 2 1
8. Tubao Credit Coop 1
10. Panelco 1 9
11. Adventist MPC 2
12. United Primary MPC 1
13. Ilocandia Seed Grower MPC 1
14. St. Loui Credit Coop 1 1
15. PCU MPC 1
778
198
43
11
Micro Small Medium Large
80 % of micro and small cooperatives graduating to higher enterprise category by 2025 (baseline 2013) 90% of cooperatives are compliant with existing law and procedures
o to capacitate the micro and small cooperatives in their compliance with the reportorial requirements in making enough leeway for those cooperatives to assimilate the rigors of standard during the infancy and development stage
o If ever there is a need for the CDA to provide direct technical assistance in the form of training , it should be confined within the expertise of CDA (IRR, RA 9520 and regulations, capacity building on the reportorial requirements and other related issuances
o cooperatives with assets not more than PhP 100,000 operating for not more than 2 years be exempt in the submission of reports. In lieu of the AFS, the FS may be certified by the Audit Committee
o consolidation of several reports into one to be called Cooperative Annual Progress Report for the purpose of compliance
o as far as practicable, micro cooperatives with assets below PhP 100,000 are exempted in the submission of Social Audit Report
1. Appropriate structure to define the roles of federations and unions; 2. CDA issuances affecting federations and unions; 3. Code of Ethics; 4. Performance standard and reporting
tools
o The financial infusion to small
and micro cooperatives from outside source must be supplemented by organizational building components
o In order for the micro and small cooperatives not to be used by unscrupulous big business interest, they shall be prohibited to engage in the importation activities inasmuch as their financial capabilities and business tract records are yet to be established or proven
o Continuing review and
enhancement of the existing standard training curriculum and to identify measures to improve cooperative governance and performance
o Include in the classification of
cooperative under RA 9530 the agricultural cooperatives
o Rationalize the issuance of CGS
by renaming it as Certificate of Compliance to eliminate the mistaken notion that the CGS is the seal of good housekeeping
Vision 2020 outlines opportunity
for cooperatives to grow. To
pursue the 2020 vision, ICA
outlines five critical themes to
form part of the cooperative
sector’s agenda.
1. Elevate participation within
membership and governance to a
new level
2. Position cooperatives as builders of
sustainability
3. Build cooperative message and
secure the cooperative identity
4. Ensure supportive legal frameworks
for cooperatives growth
5. Secure reliable cooperative capital
while guaranteeing control
Is the Philippines prepared
for AEC 2015?
Former DBM Sec. Benjamin Diokno
Forget about the issue of
whether we are ready for the
ASEAN integration in 2015.
That should be your least
concern- the immediate
concern is how to develop
your organization from
within to harness your
productive capacity and
your purchasing power.
That’s amore manageable
problem
Our ASEAN
Community is to be
built on three
“pillars”: an
Economic
Community, a Socio-
Cultural Community,
and a Political-
Security Community
The region will become a single market and production base with five core elements namely: o free flow of goods; o free flow of services; o free flow of investment; o free flow of capital; and o free flow of skilled labor
Growing demand for food
safety certification
Good Agricultural Practices
Gap Certificate
Malaysia
Malaysia has developed a number of quality assurance programmes for primary producers with a number of voluntary farm certification schemes including the fresh fruit and vegetable sector certification (SALM); livestock certification (SALT); fisheries and aquaculture certification (SPLAM) and organic sector certification (SOM). The implementation of GAP standards in Malaysia started with the introduction of the Farm Accreditation Scheme of Malaysia (SALM) in 2002 by the Department of Agriculture (DOA). SALM is a programme designed to accredit farms that adopt Good agricultural practices, are operated in a sustainable and environmentally friendly way, and yield quality products that are safe for consumption
Thailand In response to quality and safety requirements of both export and
domestic markets, the Government of Thailand has made significant steps towards the development, introduction and implementation of quality and safety "Q" certification programmes. A "Q" scheme has been developed to certify each step of food production safety with a "Q" logo used for all agricultural products (crops, livestock and fisheries). The Department of Agriculture grants several certificates including Q GAP, Q Packing house and Q Shop, among others. A Quality Management System: Good Agricultural Practice (GAP) for on-farm production was developed by modifying concepts of international standards with 3 levels of certification. Level 1 is pesticide-residue safe; Level 2 is pesticide-residue safe and pest free, and level 3 is pesticide-residue safe, pest free and with premium quality.
Japan • The Japan Good Agricultural Initiative (JGAI) was formed by a
group of Japanese producers in April 2005, to establish a system that ensures the safety of agricultural produce by establishing one common standard of good agricultural practices in Japan - The JGAP scheme is divided into four chapters:
• Food safety, including critical control points on fertilizers, seed, produce handling.
• Environmental considerations including water, soil, energy, neighboring sites
• Workers' welfare and safety including minimum wage and training
• Sales management including record keeping and traceability
Thailand In response to quality and safety requirements of both export
and domestic markets, the Government of Thailand has made significant steps towards the development, introduction and implementation of quality and safety "Q" certification programmes. A "Q" scheme has been developed to certify each step of food production safety with a "Q" logo used for all agricultural products (crops, livestock and fisheries). The Department of Agriculture grants several certificates including Q GAP, Q Packing house and Q Shop, among others. A Quality Management System: Good Agricultural Practice (GAP) for on-farm production was developed by modifying concepts of international standards with 3 levels of certification. Level 1 is pesticide-residue safe; Level 2 is pesticide-residue safe and pest free, and level 3 is pesticide-residue safe, pest free and with premium quality.
The People's Republic of China - Green Food and China GAP certification
The Chinese Government has established a state agro product and food certification system in the food chain and has developed two GAP programmes to introduce certification in farming. These two GAP programmes are intended to stimulate agriculture, reduce the risks linked to food safety, coordinate various sectors of the supply chain of agricultural products and stimulate the development of international good agricultural practice standards and relevant certification and accreditation activities. The Ministry of Agriculture has developed the Green Food standard to develop good agricultural practices for the Chinese national market
Status of Compliance
Source: Noel de Luna, Chief International Relations Division, DA
Central Office, 1st RAFEN symposium, Regency Hotel, Calasiao,
Pang. Oct 28, 2014
Cheaper goods
Better quality
Wider choices
Other prohibited importations:
• Onions, potatoes, garlic and cabbages, except for seeding purposes; Republic Act (RA) no. 296
• Coffee (RA no. 2712)
• Used clothing and rags (RA no. 4653)
• Toy guns (Letter of Instruction no. 1264)
o the elimination of tariff should result in product price reduction throughout ASEAN o encouraging higher market competitions
o Help ASEAN countries products gain access to a regional market that incorporate many substantial advantages e.g population of more than 550 million, $1.5 trillion GDP, convenient transport systems, huge international trade worth $1.7 trillion a year and foreign investment of $ 60 Billion
o consumers will benefit from cheaper prices of goods o some of the processing factories will enjoy cheaper imported raw materials cutting their production costs oASEAN will be integrated and larger market that will be stronger and larger o the export and investment sectors will generate higher potential in the long run
National Reforms
• Basically, member-states must dismantle home-grown barriers that raise costs, reduce competition, and deter new investments. Unfortunately, we know that some ASEAN governments (the Philippines included) still protect favored national corporations and family dynasties from competition. Also, they continue to keep unproductive firms afloat by tolerating evasion of taxes, product regulations, and even bribery practices.
• Increased economies of scale and scope, heightened competition, higher productivity at the company level – all these reforms are needed to stimulate higher investment, generate more intra-regional trade, and encourage the emergence of globally competitive Southeast Asian enterprises. It is still problematic for the Philippines to attain AEC by 2015, but we must try hard and keep trying harder
National Reforms
https://ph.celebrity.yahoo.com/news/asean-integration-stakeholders-last-two-parts-
170957601.html;_ylt=AwrTWfwNAlBU.XAAolrQtDMD
