2018 Handbook for Category & Organization Judges
Prince William - Manassas Regional Science Fair An International Science and Engineering Fair Affiliate
Sponsored by Prince William County Public Schools
2
School Board
Mr. Ryan Sawyers Chairman
Mrs. Lillie G. Jessie Vice Chairman
Occoquan District
Mr. William J. Deutsch Mr. Gil Trenum Coles District Brentsville District Ms. Diane L. Raulston Mr. Justin David Wilk Neabsco District Potomac District Mrs. Alyson A. Satterwhite Ms. Loree Y. Williams Gainesville District Woodbridge District
Superintendent of Schools
Dr. Steven L. Walts
Superintendent’s Staff
Mr. Keith A. Imon Deputy Superintendent
Mr. William G. Bixby Associate Superintendent for Middle Schools
Mr. David S. Cline Associate Superintendent for Finance and Support Services
Mr. R. Todd Erickson Associate Superintendent for Central Elementary Schools
Mrs. Rita Everett Goss Associate Superintendent for Student Learning and Accountability
Mrs. Jarcelynn M. Hart Associate Superintendent for Western Elementary Schools
Mrs. Denise M. Huebner Associate Superintendent for Eastern Elementary Schools
Mr. Keith J. Johnson Associate Superintendent for Human Resources
Mr. Philip B. Kavits Associate Superintendent for Communications and Technology Services
Mr. Michael A. Mulgrew Associate Superintendent for High Schools
P.O. BOX 389 MANASSAS, VA 20108 703.791.7200 WWW.PWCS.EDU
Prince William County Public Schools (PWCS) does not discriminate in employment or in its educational programs and activities against qualified individuals on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, pregnancy, childbirth or related
medical conditions, age, marital status, veteran status, or disability, or any other basis prohibited by law. Associate Superintendent for Human Resources
Prince William County Public Schools, P.O. Box 389, Manassas, VA 20108
3
Table of Contents
Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 4
Schedule of Events .......................................................................................................................... 6
Directions to Prince William Cunty Public Schools Kelly Leadership Center .............................. 7
Categories and Topic Descriptions ................................................................................................. 8
Judging Guidelines, Hints, and Suggested Questions ................................................................... 10
Appendix A - Evaluation Rubrics ................................................................................................. 12
Appendix B - Consensus Worksheets ........................................................................................... 16
Appendix C - Awards Reports ...................................................................................................... 18
Notes ............................................................................................................................................. 21
4
February 13, 2018
Dear Regional Science Fair Judge,
Welcome to the 2018 Prince William-Manassas Regional Science Fair! On behalf of
Prince William County Public Schools (PWCS), I would like to thank you for contributing your
time and professional expertise to evaluating this year’s regional science fair projects and to
providing our students with quality feedback on their research efforts.
This handbook provides a complete schedule of events, detailed project evaluation criteria, and
samples of judging rubrics and other applicable documents. It also offers a few helpful judging
hints and a list of suggested questions for student interviews.
Please contact me if you have questions or require further information at 703.791.7240 or
Sincerely,
Julia Renberg
Director of Prince William-Manassas Regional Science Fair
Supervisor of Science and Family Life Education, PWCS
5
Middle Division (Grades 7 – 8)
Senior Division (Grades 9 – 12)
Schedule of Events
Saturday, March 10, 2018
Kelly Leadership Center
7:30 – 8 a.m. Check in and breakfast
8 a.m. Orientation
8:30 a.m. Judging begins
1 p.m. All judging should be completed
Lunch
(Served beginning at noon)
Judges are invited to lunch
upon completing of judging
12:30 p.m. – 1 p.m. Grand Prize judges check in and lunch
1 p.m. Grand Prize judging begins
2:30 p.m. Grand Prize judging concludes
4 – 5 p.m.
(Grades 7 – 8)
Awards Ceremony
(All judges are invited to attend)
5:15 – 6 p.m.
(Grades 9 – 12)
6
Schedule of Events
Saturday, April 7, 2018
Kelly Leadership Center
7:30 – 8 a.m. Check in and breakfast
8 a.m. Orientation
8:30 a.m. Judging begins
1 p.m. All judging should be completed
Lunch
(Served beginning at noon)
Judges are invited to lunch
upon completing of judging
12:30 p.m. – 1 p.m. Grand Prize judges check in and lunch
1 p.m. Grand Prize judging begins
2 p.m. Grand Prize judging concludes
3 – 4 p.m. Awards Ceremony
(All judges are invited to attend)
Junior Division (Grades 5 – 6)
7
Kelly Leadership Center
14715 Bristow Road
Manassas, VA 20112
PWCS Science Office 703.791.7240
From I-95/Rt. 1:
Take Va-234 N/Dumfries Rd N. (Travel 7.9 miles)
Turn Left onto Bristow Rd/Va-619. (Travel 0.4 miles)
The Kelly Leadership Center is on the right
14715 Bristow Rd., Manassas, VA 20112-3945
From I-66:
Take Va-234 S via Exit 44 toward Manassas/Dumfries.
(Travel 14.5 miles)
Turn Right onto Independent Hill Rd. (Travel 0.4 miles)
Turn left onto Bristow Rd/Va-619. (Travel 0.6 miles)
The Kelly Leadership Center is on the left
14715 Bristow Rd., Manassas, VA 20112-3945
Directions to
Prince William County Public Schools
8
MIDDLE/SENIOR DIVISION (Grades 7–8 and 9–12)
Category Project Focus
Animal Sciences AS genetics, physiology, pathology, and systematics
Behavioral and Social
Sciences
BE human clinical and developmental psychology, cognitive
physiological psychology, and sociology
Biochemistry BI chemical processes within and relating to living organisms
Chemistry CH analytical chemistry, inorganic chemistry, organic chemistry,
and physical chemistry
Computer Science CS algorithms/data bases, artificial intelligence, networking and
communications, graphics, simulations/virtual reality,
operating systems, and software engineering
Earth and Planetary
Sciences
EP climatology, weather, geochemistry, mineralogy, tectonics,
paleontology, and geophysics
Engineering EN civil, constructional, chemical, industrial, electrical,
computer, and mechanical engineering, materials sciences,
bioengineering, and robotics
Environmental Sciences EV air, soil, and water pollution/quality, bioremediation,
environmental engineering, land resource management,
recycling and waste management
Mathematics MA probability and statistics, and applied mathematics
Medicine & Health
Sciences
MH disease diagnosis and treatment, epidemiology, human
genetics, and pathophysiology
Microbiology MI bacteriology, virology, and microbial studies
Physics PH Newtonian physics, instrumentation and electronics, nuclear
and particle physics, optics/laser, and theoretical physics
Plant Sciences PS agriculture, agronomy, horticulture, forestry, plant taxonomy
and evolution, plant physiology, plant pathology, and plant
genetics
Categories and Topic Descriptions
9
JUNIOR DIVISION (Grades 5-6)
Category Project Focus
Animal Sciences AS Projects that study animals; typically, animals that live
alongside humans. This category includes studies that
might involve vertebrates (non-humans) and/or
invertebrates.
Behavioral and Social
Sciences
BE Projects that study interactions among living things and
their environment. This category might include studies on
learning, perception, public opinion, and learning.
Biochemistry BI Projects on substances and chemical processes of living
things. This category might include a study on
photosynthesis or chemical digestion.
Chemistry CH Projects that study physical matter and how it changes
through interactions with other matter. This category
might include studies of chemical reactions, as well as
product testing (comparison of shampoos, dyes, etc.).
Computer Science and
Mathematics
CS-M Projects that deal with computer software and
mathematical reasoning. This category might include a
study on programming or computational thinking.
Earth and Planetary
Sciences
ES Projects that study Earth systems and anything beyond our
planet. This category might include a study of fossil
formations, earthquakes, or celestial objects.
Engineering EN Projects that design and study complicated machines,
systems, or structures. This category might include a
study that involves robotics or simple tools.
Environmental
Sciences
EV Projects that study the environment and its relationships
with living things. This category might include a study on
recycling and waste management.
Medicine and Health
Sciences
MH Projects that study human health or diseases and their
prevention and treatment. This category includes studies
on teeth, skin, nutrition, allergies, hearing, and related
areas.
Microbiology MI Projects that study living things that could be seen under a
microscope. This category includes studies with bacteria
or mold.
Physics PH Projects that study how matter and energy interact.
This category might include a study on motion, light,
sound, electricity, and magnetism.
Plant Science PS Projects that study plants. This category might include a
study on plants’ growth or reproduction.
Categories and Topic Descriptions
10
➢ Each entry should be judged in the domains of 1) the scientific research process,
and 2) the intellectual creativity and uniqueness of the product.
➢ The evaluation rubrics encompass 6 criteria categories and allow for 100 possible points
(Appendix A).
➢ Every student should have an opportunity to present his or her project and to be actively
interviewed for about 5-10 minutes by at least two or more judges.
Judges should not complete scoring evaluations in the presence of students.
➢ Each judge should rank evaluated projects based on the number of total points earned.
➢ Judges meet and share their project rankings on the Consensus Worksheet (Appendix
B). Note: discussion and possible reevaluation of projects may occur.
➢ Judges should arrive at a group consensus and record the place winners on the Report of
Awards (Appendix C).
➢ Examine the quality of the student’s work and how well the student understands the
project and the area of study. The physical display is important, but secondary to the
student’s knowledge of the research.
➢ Look for evidence of laboratory or field work, not just library research.
➢ Keep in mind the age of the student. Sometimes judges give students either far more
credit than deserved or not enough because it is not in the Nobel Prize category.
➢ Compare displays and presentations only in the same category and not with projects seen
elsewhere or under other circumstances.
➢ If the student(s) is/are present:
• Keep in mind that the fair is not only a competition, but also an educational and
inspirational experience for students. The high point of the fair for most students is
their face-to-face interview with the judges. For this reason, please use encouraging
tone when asking questions, offering suggestions, or giving constructive criticism.
• Remember that students have a prospect of revising and/or expanding on their
projects in the future. Engage students in self-reflection as an opportunity to let you
know if they are aware of any shortcomings in the research or procedure.
Judging Guidelines
Judging Hints
11
Background Knowledge Why did you decide on this research?
What was the purpose of your project?
What resource did you find that was helpful? Why?
Experimental Design What was your hypothesis?
What variable did you intentionally change?
What response did you observe or measure?
What did you intentionally keep the same?
What group did you compare against the others? Why?
How many times did you repeat the experiment?
Materials and Methods What materials did you use?
What steps did you follow in conducting the experiment?
If you had a mentor, in what ways did the mentor assist you?
Results/Conclusion What were the results of your experiment?
How did the results relate to your original hypothesis?
What conclusions did you make?
If you conducted the experiment again, what would you do differently?
What additional experiments would you suggest?
Which groups in the community would be interested in your research?
What recommendations would you make to these groups?
What was the most important thing you learned from the experiment?
Source: Cothron, Giese, & Rezba. Students and Research, Kendall/Hunt, 1989.
Suggested Questions for Student Interviews
12
Appendix A
Evaluation Rubrics
13
Judging Criteria
Junior Division (Grades 5-6)
Project Name & Number
Title (0–5 pts)
• A statement that relates the independent and dependent
variables is included
Experimental Design (0–50 pts)
• Question is identified (10 pts)
• Hypothesis is stated and relates to the question (10 pts)
• Independent variable is identified (10 pts)
• Dependent variable is identified (10 pts)
• Constants are identified (10 pts)
Materials & Procedures (0–10 pts)
• Materials and equipment list is provided (5 pts)
• Steps of the procedures followed are enumerated (5 pts)
Results (0–15 pts)
• Data table with titles, labels, units (5pts)
• Graph with correct scale, titles, labels, units (5pts)
• Interpretation of data; explanation of results (5 pts)
Conclusion (0–10 pts)
• Includes a summary of the investigation (2 pts)
• Explains the purpose of the investigation (2 pts)
• States the results, including whether hypothesis was
supported or not supported by the data (2 pts)
• Identifies potential errors (2 pts)
• Includes two new discoveries/new learnings (2 pts)
Creativity (0–10 pts)
• Demonstrates innovative ideas (5 pts)
• Visual presentation is organized, complete, neat (5 pts)
GRAND TOTAL (100 points possible)
14
Judging Criteria
Middle Division (Grades 7-8)
Project Name & Number
Title (0–5 pts)
• A statement that relates the independent and dependent variables is
included
Experimental Design (0–42 pts)
• Question is identified (7 pts)
• Literature Review is provided (7 pts)
• Hypothesis is stated and relates to the question (7 pts)
• Independent variable is identified (7 pts)
• Dependent variable is identified (7 pts)
• Constants are identified (7 pts)
Materials & Procedures (0–10 pts)
• Materials and equipment list is provided (5 pts)
• Steps of the procedures followed are enumerated (5 pts)
Results (0–15 pts)
• Data table with titles, labels, units (5pts)
• Graph with correct scale, titles, labels, units (5pts)
• Interpretation of data; explanation of results (5 pts)
Conclusion (0–10 pts)
• Includes a summary of the investigation (2 pts)
• Explains the purpose of the investigation (2 pts)
• States the results, including whether hypothesis was supported or not
supported by the data (2 pts)
• Identifies potential errors (2 pts)
• Includes two new discoveries/new learnings (2 pts)
Creativity (0–10 pts)
• Demonstrates innovative ideas (5 pts)
• Visual presentation is organized, complete, neat (5 pts)
Interview (0–8 pts)
• Understanding of relevant science, interpretation, limitation of results
• Clear and thoughtful responses to questions
GRAND TOTAL (100 points possible)
15
Judging Criteria
Senior Division (Grades 9-12)
Project Name & Number
Research Question (10 pts)
• Clear and focused purpose
• Identifies contribution(s) to the field
• Testable using science methods
Design and Methodology (15 pts)
• Well-designed plan and data collection methods
• Variables and controls defined, appropriate, and complete
Execution: Data Collection, Analysis, and Interpretation (20 pts)
• Systematic data collection and analysis
• Reproducibility of results
• Appropriate application of mathematical and statistics methods
• Sufficient data collected to support interpretation and conclusions
Creativity (20 pts)
• Project demonstrates significant creativity in one or more of the
above categories
Presentation: Display (10 pts)
• Logical organization of material
• Clarity of graphics and legends
Presentation: Interview (25 pts)
• Clear, concise, thoughtful responses to questions
• Understanding of basic science relevant to project
• Understanding interpretation and limitations of results and conclusion
• Degree of independence in conducting project
• Recognition of potential impact in science, society, and/or economics
• Quality of ideas for further research
• For team projects, contributions to and understanding of project by all
members
GRAND TOTAL (100 points possible)
16
Appendix B
Consensus Worksheets
17
Category: _________________________________________________
Project
Number
Judge
1
Judge
2
Judge
3
Judge
4
Judge
5
Judge
6
Total
Relative
Ranking
PLACE
1. List in numerical sequence all projects considered for an award.
2. Each judge should record the relative rankings of his or her own evaluation: project with highest points earned receives a
ranking of 10; next highest receives nine, etc.
3. Total the relative rankings for each project.
4. Determine places by the total relative rankings.
5. No more than three Honorable Mentions should be awarded.
6. Record the order in the place column.
7. Transfer the information to the Category Awards Report For
Consensus Worksheet for Category Judges
18
Appendix C
Awards Reports
19
Category: ___________________________________________________________________________________
Division (circle one): Junior (Grades 5–6) Middle (Grades 7–8) Senior (Grades 9–12)
Award Project
Number
Project Title
First Place
Second Place
Third Place
Honorable Mention
Honorable Mention
Honorable Mention
Judges Initials: __________ __________ __________ __________
Submit this Category Awards Report, along with the Consensus Worksheet for Category Judges, to Science Fair Personnel
Prince William-Manassas Regional Science Fair
Division Category Awards Report
20
Organization: _______________________________________________________________________________
Names of Judges:
Award Project
Number
Project Title
First Place
Second Place
Third Place
Honorable Mention
Honorable Mention
Honorable Mention
Description of Organization Award:__________________________________________________________________
Submit this Organization Awards Report to Science Fair Personnel
Prince William-Manassas Regional Science Fair
Organization Awards Report Grades 7–12
21
NOTES