![Page 1: 3D-Dynamic design for reinforced versus prestress concrete for Al-Huriya building](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062520/56815c02550346895dc9eaa4/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
3D-Dynamic design for reinforced versus prestress concrete for Al-Huriya building
Prepared by
Nizar Abed Al-Majeed SalamehMohamed Khaled Abu-Al Huda
Supervisor Dr. Imad Al-Qasem
![Page 2: 3D-Dynamic design for reinforced versus prestress concrete for Al-Huriya building](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062520/56815c02550346895dc9eaa4/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
CHAPTER ONEINTROUCTION
The project is a structural analysis and 3D-Dynamic design of an office building in Ramallah city, known as AL-Huriya, which consists of a seven stories, with 3.5 height except the first floor with 4m story height.
The building will be first designed under a static load, after that we will study the building for dynamic , finally a prestress concrete will be used to design the building to compare it with the reinforcement concrete, to conclude many factors that should be taken into consideration in designing any structure. These include economic factors , durability and the safety of its inhabitants.
![Page 3: 3D-Dynamic design for reinforced versus prestress concrete for Al-Huriya building](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062520/56815c02550346895dc9eaa4/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
System Part F’c fy
Reinforced Concrete Slab 250 kg/cm2 4200 kg/cm2
Beams 250 kg/cm2 4200 kg/cm2
Columns 500 kg/cm2 4200 kg/cm2
Footings 250 , 500 kg/cm2 4200 kg’cm2
Prestress Concrete slab 6000Psi 243Ksi
Columns 500 kg/cm2 4200 kg/cm2
Footings 250 , 500 kg/cm2 4200 kg/cm2
Materials
Live load 0.4ton/m2
Super imposed load 0.3ton/m2
Loads
![Page 4: 3D-Dynamic design for reinforced versus prestress concrete for Al-Huriya building](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062520/56815c02550346895dc9eaa4/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
CHAPTER TWOSLAB
![Page 5: 3D-Dynamic design for reinforced versus prestress concrete for Al-Huriya building](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062520/56815c02550346895dc9eaa4/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
One way solid slab is used only as slab system
Use slab thickness of 17cm , according to deflection requirement
In design phase of the slab, there are two strip(1m) taken as a model.
Wu=1.51
Wu=1.51
Strip I
Strip II
Loads distribution
![Page 6: 3D-Dynamic design for reinforced versus prestress concrete for Al-Huriya building](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062520/56815c02550346895dc9eaa4/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Strip I
Use 4Ф12mm for negative and positive moment
Moment distribution
Strip II
![Page 7: 3D-Dynamic design for reinforced versus prestress concrete for Al-Huriya building](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062520/56815c02550346895dc9eaa4/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
CHAPTER THREEBEAMS
Beams in this part of the project will be designed using reactions from beam model in SAP2000.
The girder system is used to design the building, and all of the beams are dropped; multi span and large space beams are used in all floors.
The system of the building consist of a four beams group (B1, B2, B3, B4)And a two group of girders (G1, G2).
![Page 8: 3D-Dynamic design for reinforced versus prestress concrete for Al-Huriya building](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062520/56815c02550346895dc9eaa4/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
![Page 9: 3D-Dynamic design for reinforced versus prestress concrete for Al-Huriya building](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062520/56815c02550346895dc9eaa4/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Design for Moment
Final ResultsPositive Moment Negative Moment
Exterior spans Interior span Interior supportsBeams Dimensions Mn Ρ As Mn ρ As Mn ρ As
B1 30x80 65.61 0.0102 25.45 1.31 0.0033 7.62 58.76 0.0091 22.90
B2 50x90 168.82 0.0112 58.88 3.44 0.0033 14.70 152.17 0.0113 49.06
B3 50x90 183.76 0.0141 63.78 - - - 129.34 0.0094 44.16
B4 60x100 263.26 0.0133 78.50 - - - - - -
Final Results
Positive Moment Negative Moment
Exterior spans 1st interior spans 2nd interior spans 1st interior supports 2nd interior supports
Girders Dimensions Mn ρ As Mn ρ As Mn ρ As Mn ρ As Mn ρ As
G1 50x90 164.24 0.0123 53.97 51.99 .0036 19.63 117.93 .0085 39.25 163.62 0.0123 53.97 141.8 0.0104 40.06
G2 90x100 384.78 0.0129 112.54 219.22 .0069 64.31 62.57 .0033 32.15 411.27 0.0141 120.58 209.44 0.0066 56.27
Moment Design
Parameter Dimensions Mn As Vn Vc Vs Av S
Units cm ton.m cm2 ton ton ton cm2 cm
![Page 10: 3D-Dynamic design for reinforced versus prestress concrete for Al-Huriya building](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062520/56815c02550346895dc9eaa4/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Shear Design
Design for Shear
Final Results Exterior spans Interior span
Beams Dimensions Vn Vc Vs Av S Vn Vc Vs Av S
B1 30x80 31.746 18.855 12.890 1.57 35 21.250 18.855 2.395 1.57 35
B2 50x90 80.10 35.61 44.49 3.14 25 54 35.61 18.39 3.14 40
B3 50x90 77.22 35.61 41.61 3.14 25 25.10 35.61 14.875 3.14 40
B4 60x100 69.69 47.76 21.43 3.14 45 - - - - -
Final Results Exterior spans 1st interior spans 2nd interior span
Girders Dimensions
Vn Vc Vs Av S Vn Vc Vs Av S Vn Vc Vs Av S
G1 50x90 93.49
35.61 57.88
3.14
20 75.44
35.61
39.83
3.14
25 92.26
35.61
56.65
3.14 20
G2 90x100 229.1
71.64 157.4
3.14
5 202.6
71.64
131 3.14
5 99.52
71.64
27.88
3.14 45
![Page 11: 3D-Dynamic design for reinforced versus prestress concrete for Al-Huriya building](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062520/56815c02550346895dc9eaa4/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Final Results
For positive moment (span) Negative moment (support)
Beam Exterior 1st interior 2nd interior 1st interior 2nd interior
B1 10Φ18 3Φ18 - 9Φ18 -
B2 12Φ25 3Φ25 - 10Φ25 -
B3 13Φ25 - - 9Φ25 -
B4 16Φ25 - - - -
G1 11Φ25 4Φ25 8Φ25 11Φ25 10Φ25
G2 14Φ32 8Φ32 4Φ32 15Φ32 7Φ32
![Page 12: 3D-Dynamic design for reinforced versus prestress concrete for Al-Huriya building](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062520/56815c02550346895dc9eaa4/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
CHAPTER FOURCOLUMNS
sixteen columns having a rectangular section, and eight columns having a circular section, will be designed.
All the columns in this project are classified into two groups depending on the ultimate axial load and the shape.
The ultimate axial load on each column is from the Reaction of beams
Columns number Ultimate load(ton) Ultimate loads from seven stories(ton)
C1 144.24 1009.68C2 60.96 426.72C3 179.18 1254.26C4 452.71 3168.97C5 287.65 2013.55
Group (1) C1,C2,C3 Rectangular
Group (2) C4,C5 Circular
![Page 13: 3D-Dynamic design for reinforced versus prestress concrete for Al-Huriya building](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062520/56815c02550346895dc9eaa4/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
![Page 14: 3D-Dynamic design for reinforced versus prestress concrete for Al-Huriya building](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062520/56815c02550346895dc9eaa4/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Summary of result
Group Pu(ton)
Dimensions(h*b)(cm) spirally (D)(cm)
ρ As(cm2) # of bars Shear reinforcement
I 1254.26 100*50 0.0152 76.04 16 Φ25mm 4 Φ10mm/30cm
II 3168.97 Spiral, D=100 0.0206 267.41 34 Φ32mm Φ10mm(spirally)
Final Results
![Page 15: 3D-Dynamic design for reinforced versus prestress concrete for Al-Huriya building](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062520/56815c02550346895dc9eaa4/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
CHAPTER FIVEFOOTING
In this chapter the footing will be designed, all footings in this part of the project will be isolated (single) footings.
The design will depend on the total axial load carried by each column.
GroupID
Columnsincluded
Loads (ton)
Dead load Live load
F1 C1,C2,C3 726 203
F2 C4,C5 1698 504
The footings are classified into two groups
![Page 16: 3D-Dynamic design for reinforced versus prestress concrete for Al-Huriya building](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062520/56815c02550346895dc9eaa4/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
![Page 17: 3D-Dynamic design for reinforced versus prestress concrete for Al-Huriya building](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062520/56815c02550346895dc9eaa4/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Flexure Design
X-Y Direction Steel Design Mu = 107.12 ton.m
ρ = 0.0023
As = 25.62 cm2
As min = 21.6 cm2
Use As = 25.62 cm2
Bar Diameter 25 mm
# of Bars Needed 6
Spacing 16.67 cm
Group F1 Design
Use
Main Steel 6ф25/ m
Or 1ф25/16cm
Shrinkage Steel 5ф25/20cm
![Page 18: 3D-Dynamic design for reinforced versus prestress concrete for Al-Huriya building](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062520/56815c02550346895dc9eaa4/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Flexure Design X-Y Direction Steel Design
Mu = 274.80 ton.m
ρ = 0.0025 As = 43.24 cm2
As min = 32.4 cm2
Use As = 43.24 cm2
Bar Diameter 32 mm
# of Bars Needed 6
Spacing 16.67 cm
Group F2 Design
Use
Main Steel 6ф32/ m
Or 1ф32/16cm
Shrinkage Steel 5ф32/20cm
![Page 19: 3D-Dynamic design for reinforced versus prestress concrete for Al-Huriya building](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062520/56815c02550346895dc9eaa4/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
FootingID
Footing Dimentions (m) Bottom Steel Top Steel
Width Length Thickness Long dir. Short dir. Long dir. Short dir.
F1 4.6 5.1 1.2 6ф25/ m 6ф25/ m 3ф25/20cm 3ф25/20cm
F2 7.45 7.45 1.8 6ф32/ m 6ф32/ m 3ф32/20cm 3ф32/20cm
Final Results
![Page 20: 3D-Dynamic design for reinforced versus prestress concrete for Al-Huriya building](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062520/56815c02550346895dc9eaa4/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Ground Beam Design
![Page 21: 3D-Dynamic design for reinforced versus prestress concrete for Al-Huriya building](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062520/56815c02550346895dc9eaa4/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Dimensions Bottom & Top Steel
G.B Width(m) Depth(m) exterior interior Support
G.B I 0.4 0.7 7Ф20 5ф18 7Ф25
G.B II 0.5 0.75 9Ф25 5ф18 10ф25
Final Result
![Page 22: 3D-Dynamic design for reinforced versus prestress concrete for Al-Huriya building](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062520/56815c02550346895dc9eaa4/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Static vs. Dynamic analysis
Our representative element will be the bending moment at the mid span of the interior span in the 2nd frame for each model.
We will take model for three stories , seven stories and ten stories then read the moment due to dead load and live load.
Moment due Three Stories
Seven Stories Ten Stories Average
Live Load 9.7 9.52 9.72 9.54 9.82 9.66
Dead Load 25.38 24.93 25.46 24.99 25.77 25.31
As the result shows, the common practice is correct for interior floors in static analysis
Static analysis
![Page 23: 3D-Dynamic design for reinforced versus prestress concrete for Al-Huriya building](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062520/56815c02550346895dc9eaa4/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Columns Comparison
Our representative element will be the axial force due to live load .
We will take model for three stories , seven stories and ten stories ,then read the axial force for corner , edge and interior columns in the bottom of each model.
SAP 2000 Analysis Results
Axial Force For
Three Stories Seven Stories Ten Stories
Corner Column 43.32 ton 105.98 ton 157.76 ton
Edge Column 86.68 ton 207.98 ton 302.27 ton
Interior Column 241.98 ton 485.37 ton 676.77 ton
![Page 24: 3D-Dynamic design for reinforced versus prestress concrete for Al-Huriya building](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062520/56815c02550346895dc9eaa4/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Internal Col.
Edge Col.
Corner Col.
Tributary area
![Page 25: 3D-Dynamic design for reinforced versus prestress concrete for Al-Huriya building](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062520/56815c02550346895dc9eaa4/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Tributary area Results
Live Load = 0.4 ton/m2
Axial Force For Three Stories Seven Stories Ten Stories
Corner Column 43.03 ton 100.41 ton 143.44 ton
Edge Column 93.66 ton 218.53 ton 312.19 ton
Interior Column 187.31 ton 437.06 ton 624.38 ton
![Page 26: 3D-Dynamic design for reinforced versus prestress concrete for Al-Huriya building](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062520/56815c02550346895dc9eaa4/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Using SAP 2000 Software
# of Stories T(sec) Mass Participation Ratio Direction
One 0.534228 0.995042 X-Direction
0.435512 0.996652 Y-Direction
Three1.099129 0.965566 X-Direction
0.882423 0.970756 Y-Direction
Seven2.092426 0.932716 X-Direction
1.65703 0.938386 Y-Direction
Ten2.806996 0.913832 X-Direction
2.21439 0.91895 Y-Direction
Seven+Elcento
2.092426 0.932716 X-Direction
1.65709 0.938386 Y-Direction
Dynamic Analysis
![Page 27: 3D-Dynamic design for reinforced versus prestress concrete for Al-Huriya building](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062520/56815c02550346895dc9eaa4/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
CHAPTER SEVENPRESTRESS CONCRETE
Prestress concrete is not a new concept, it’s backing to 1872. (Jackson), an engineer from California, patented prestressing system that used a tie rod to construct beams or arches from individual blocks.The most practical development in prestressed concrete occurred from (1920 – 1960).
Introduction
We will design the prestress building for gravity loads only, and the punching shear excluded from this study.
(ACI units is used)
![Page 28: 3D-Dynamic design for reinforced versus prestress concrete for Al-Huriya building](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062520/56815c02550346895dc9eaa4/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Material properties and loads
Material properties:-f’c =6000 Psi f’c i = 4200 Psffpu = 270 Ksi fpy =243 Ksifpe= 159 Ksi fy = 60000 PsiUse strands = 1.0 inch. Pe= 257597 Ib
Loads:-live load (LL) = 80 PsfSuper Imposed Load (SID) = 60 Psf
![Page 29: 3D-Dynamic design for reinforced versus prestress concrete for Al-Huriya building](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062520/56815c02550346895dc9eaa4/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Slab thickness = Slab thickness = = 13.13 inches.
Take slab thickness = 13.5 inches.
![Page 30: 3D-Dynamic design for reinforced versus prestress concrete for Al-Huriya building](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062520/56815c02550346895dc9eaa4/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Check stresses:-
1) check allowable stresses for the prestressing force and the slab own weight.
2) Check the ultimate strength .
Slab Design for prestress system
![Page 31: 3D-Dynamic design for reinforced versus prestress concrete for Al-Huriya building](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062520/56815c02550346895dc9eaa4/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Columns design for Prestress system
Sixteen columns having a rectangular section, and eight columns having a circular section, will be designed.
All the columns in this project are classified into two groups depending on the ultimate axial load and the shape.
The ultimate axial load on each column is from the Tributary area.
Columns number Ultimate loads from seven stories(ton)C1 606.06C2 1119.30C3 1210.70C4 1725.00C5 2240.00
Group (1) C1,C2,C3
Group (2) C4,C5
s
![Page 32: 3D-Dynamic design for reinforced versus prestress concrete for Al-Huriya building](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062520/56815c02550346895dc9eaa4/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Summary of result
GroupDimensions(h*b)(cm)
spirally (D)(cm)ρ As(cm2) # of bars Shear reinforcement
I 95*55 0.0123 28.16 8 Φ22mm 4 Φ10mm/25cm
II Spiral, D=900.0142
3128.68 16 Φ32mm Φ10mm(spirally)
Final Results
![Page 33: 3D-Dynamic design for reinforced versus prestress concrete for Al-Huriya building](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062520/56815c02550346895dc9eaa4/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Footing design for prestress system
All footings in this part of the project will be isolated (single) footings.The design will depend on the total axial load carried by each column.
The footings are classified into two groups
GroupID
Columnsincluded
Loads (ton)
Dead load Live load
F1 C1,C2,C3 694 236
F2 C4,C5 1284 437
![Page 34: 3D-Dynamic design for reinforced versus prestress concrete for Al-Huriya building](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062520/56815c02550346895dc9eaa4/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Group F1 Design
Flexure Design
X-Y Direction Steel Design
Mu = 108.34 ton.m
ρ = 0.0020
As = 24.34 cm2
As min = 23.4 cm2
Use As = 24.34 cm2
Bar Diameter 25 mm
# of Bars Needed 5
Spacing 20 cm
Use
Main Steel 5ф25/ m
Or 1ф25/20cm
Shrinkage Steel 5ф25/20Cm
![Page 35: 3D-Dynamic design for reinforced versus prestress concrete for Al-Huriya building](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062520/56815c02550346895dc9eaa4/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Group F2 Design
Flexure Design
X-Y Direction Steel Design
Mu = 222.97 ton.m
ρ = 0.0031
As = 42.71 cm2
As min = 27 cm2
Use As = 42.71 cm2
Bar Diameter 28 mm
# of Bars Needed 7
Spacing 14.29 cm
Use
Main Steel 7ф28/ m
Or 1ф28/14cm
Shrinkage Steel 5ф28/20cm
![Page 36: 3D-Dynamic design for reinforced versus prestress concrete for Al-Huriya building](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062520/56815c02550346895dc9eaa4/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
FootingID
Footing Dimentions (m) Bottom Steel Top Steel
Width Length Thickness Long dir. Short dir. Long dir. Short dir.
F1 4.65 5.05 1.3 5ф25/ m 5ф25/ m3ф25/20c
m3ф25/20c
m
F2 6.6 6.6 1.5 7ф28/ m 7ф28/ m3ф28/20c
m3ф28/20c
m
Final Results