Download - 5 proyectos para repensar la ciencia abierta
![Page 1: 5 proyectos para repensar la ciencia abierta](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050614/5888a0691a28ab264b8b5cbd/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
5 proyectos para repensar la
ciencia abierta
![Page 3: 5 proyectos para repensar la ciencia abierta](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050614/5888a0691a28ab264b8b5cbd/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Elaboración de datos
Elaboraciónartículo
Revisión por pares
Publicación científica
Acceso a los trabajos
Reconocimientocolegas
Ciclo Publicación
![Page 4: 5 proyectos para repensar la ciencia abierta](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050614/5888a0691a28ab264b8b5cbd/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Figshare
Para repensar... los datos científicosReutilización VS Parasitismo
![Page 5: 5 proyectos para repensar la ciencia abierta](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050614/5888a0691a28ab264b8b5cbd/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
A second concern held by some is that a new class of research person will emerge — people who had nothing to do with the design and execution of the study .. the system will be taken over by what some researchers have characterized as “research parasites.”
FUENTE:http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMe1516564
![Page 6: 5 proyectos para repensar la ciencia abierta](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050614/5888a0691a28ab264b8b5cbd/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
F1000 Research
Para repensar... el peer reviewTransparencia VS Revisiones ligeras
![Page 7: 5 proyectos para repensar la ciencia abierta](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050614/5888a0691a28ab264b8b5cbd/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Of the 25 reviews in F1000 Research, 18 were under 200 words (four had zero words), and 21 (84%) were positive. The average length was 254 words. By contrast, the average length for the medical journals was 464 words, and only 42% were positive.
FUENTE:http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2013/03/27/how-rigorous-is-the-post-publication-review-process-at-f1000-research/
![Page 8: 5 proyectos para repensar la ciencia abierta](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050614/5888a0691a28ab264b8b5cbd/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Peer J
Para repensar... las revistas científicasNuevo modelo VS sostenibilidad
![Page 9: 5 proyectos para repensar la ciencia abierta](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050614/5888a0691a28ab264b8b5cbd/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
PeerJ's pricing system is different..Your $99 buys you lifetime membership, which gives you the right to publish one paper a year with them at no further charge. (All co-authors on multi-authored papers need to be members.) Alternatively, $299 buys an all-you-can-eat membership: publish as many papers as you want, whenever you want, for life. FUENTE:https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130210/14302221939/how-peerj-is-changing-everything-academic-publishing.shtml
![Page 10: 5 proyectos para repensar la ciencia abierta](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050614/5888a0691a28ab264b8b5cbd/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
SCI-HUB
Para repensar... el acceso abiertoAcceso Universal VS Al margen de la ley
![Page 11: 5 proyectos para repensar la ciencia abierta](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050614/5888a0691a28ab264b8b5cbd/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Pirate research-paper sites play hide-and-seek with publishers Millions of scientific articles remain freely accessible despite copyright violations. Operators of Internet repositories that provide illicit free access to millions of research papers seem determined to keep up their services
FUENTE:http://www.nature.com/news/pirate-research-paper-sites-play-hide-and-seek-with-publishers-1.18876
![Page 12: 5 proyectos para repensar la ciencia abierta](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050614/5888a0691a28ab264b8b5cbd/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Researchgate
Para repensar... la reputación científicaNuevos indicadores VS Irreproducible
![Page 13: 5 proyectos para repensar la ciencia abierta](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050614/5888a0691a28ab264b8b5cbd/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
One of the most apparent issues of the RG Score is that it is in-transparent. ResearchGate does present its users with a breakdown of the individual parts of the score… The extensive use of the RG Score in marketing e-mails suggests that it was meant to be a marketing tool that drives more traffic to the site.
FUENTE:http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2015/12/09/the-researchgate-score-a-good-example-of-a-bad-metric/
![Page 14: 5 proyectos para repensar la ciencia abierta](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050614/5888a0691a28ab264b8b5cbd/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
5 proyectos para repensar la ciencia
abierta