Download - A Comparison of Data Analysis Packages
A comparison of data analysis packages
CHEP2000 9-Feb 2000
A Comparison of Data Analysis Packages
Irwin Gaines, Jeff Kallenbach
Fermilab
A comparison of data analysis packages
CHEP2000 9-Feb 2000
Outline
• Introduction: a little history
• Build vs. Buy: general considerations
• User Requirements
• Basic Features
• Advanced features
• Conclusions
A comparison of data analysis packages
CHEP2000 9-Feb 2000
Introduction
• Previous generation HEP experiments have used a ubiquitous homemade product: PAW
• Why? Commercial systems did not offer either functionality or, more important, performance
• Use of a universal product allows:– data sharing (ntuple files)– procedure and environment sharing (kumac files)
A comparison of data analysis packages
CHEP2000 9-Feb 2000
Build vs. Buy
• Old days (70’s-80’s): in house development effort “free”, any software purchase is expensive
• More recently(90’s):attractive licensing terms, development costs should be amortized over as large a user base as possible, Support?
• Now: Consider full product lifetime costs, including development, licensing, support. Does product need to be customized or enhanced to meet HEP needs?
build buy
A comparison of data analysis packages
CHEP2000 9-Feb 2000
Project Scope
Selecting events based on programmed selection criteria
Preparing various statistical distributions of various mathematical functions of data in the selected events
Linking in high level language programs to process event data prior to plotting
Modifying selection criteria and plotted functions interactively
Fitting the distributions
Comparing and performing calculations on different distributions
Preserving selection criteria and functions for later use or to pass to others
Saving samples of events in a variety of specialized formats for later analysis
Accessing these specially formatted event samples to make plots, fits, statistical outputs, etc.
A comparison of data analysis packages
CHEP2000 9-Feb 2000
User Requirements
• Web reference: http://www.fnal.gov/projects/runii/pasrec/
• Data Access
• Data Analysis
• Data Presentation
• Usability
• Support and Maintenance
A comparison of data analysis packages
CHEP2000 9-Feb 2000
User Requirements: Data Access
• Access rates (online)
• Access rates (offline)
• Serial vs. random access
• Granularity of access
• Foreign I/O Formats
• Specialized optimized output formats
A comparison of data analysis packages
CHEP2000 9-Feb 2000
User Requirements : Data Analysis
• Scripting language
• User control
• Data selection
• Input/Output
• Numerical and mathematical functionality
• Offline compatibility
• Prototyping
A comparison of data analysis packages
CHEP2000 9-Feb 2000
User Requirements: Data Presentation
• Interactive visualization
• Presentation quality graphical output
• Formal publication graphical output
A comparison of data analysis packages
CHEP2000 9-Feb 2000
User Requirements: Usability
• Batch vs. interactive
• Sharing data structures
• Shared access by several clients
• Parallel processing (using distinct data streams)
• Debugging and profiling
• Modularity (user code)
• Modularity (system code)
• Access to source code
• Robustness
• Web based documentation
• Use of standards
• Portability
• Scalability
• Performance
• User Friendliness
A comparison of data analysis packages
CHEP2000 9-Feb 2000
User Requirements: Support
• Maturity– customer base– product lifetime– product survivability
• product support
• licensing
A comparison of data analysis packages
CHEP2000 9-Feb 2000
User Requirements: Maintenance
• who provides maintenance
• what does it cost
• maintenance infrastructure
• maturity and completeness
• modularity
• portability
• standards
• reliability and security
• application specific issues
A comparison of data analysis packages
CHEP2000 9-Feb 2000
Main Contenders
• Homemade package: ROOT
• Commercial Package: IDL (other commercial packages offer similar features; IDL appeared to be most aggressive in licensing terms)
A comparison of data analysis packages
CHEP2000 9-Feb 2000
Basic Features
• plotting
• fitting
• event selection
• command languages
• event I/O
A comparison of data analysis packages
CHEP2000 9-Feb 2000
Gee Whiz plots
A comparison of data analysis packages
CHEP2000 9-Feb 2000
Plots, Fits, Event selection
• ROOT: from browser, from tree viewer, from command line
• All plots are active,can be manipulated, saved for later use, printed in a variety of formats
• IDL:command line examples on following slides
• plots can be either static or active, displayed or printed
A comparison of data analysis packages
CHEP2000 9-Feb 2000
Displaying a Histogram
Display a histogram The Canvas
Open the a root fileBrowse the file
A comparison of data analysis packages
CHEP2000 9-Feb 2000
Fitting, Coloring, and Zooming• Adding a gaussian fit• Coloring the histogram• Zooming
A comparison of data analysis packages
CHEP2000 9-Feb 2000
The Tree Viewer
Tree Viewer buttons:– Variables
– Slider
– XYZ
– Draw, Scan, Break
– Ilist, Olist
– Gopt
– Weight
A comparison of data analysis packages
CHEP2000 9-Feb 2000
Scripting language
• ROOT• CINT C++ interpreter
(almost full C++ syntax)• commands are methods of
root classes• Full access to compiled
code (in any language)
• IDL• “natural” control
language (see examples)
• commands are part of scripting syntax
• full access to compiled code (in any language)
A comparison of data analysis packages
CHEP2000 9-Feb 2000
IDL command language
chain=["d3_51.nhis","d3_68.nhis","d3_99.nhis","d3_19.nhis","d3_04.nhis"]
mass=htGetVar(chain,"Rmass")
cut4=where(lsig gt 5 and iso1 lt .05 and clsec gt .05 and iso2 lt .03)
plot,histogram(mass(cut4),binsize=mybin)
• concatenate several files of ntuples
• read in a variable
• event selection (cut on several variables)
• plot histogram
A comparison of data analysis packages
CHEP2000 9-Feb 2000
IDL Command Language
• Fit plot and draw fit
• plot->liveplot for interactive plots
dist = histogram(mass(cut4),binsize=mybin)x=findgen(134)*mybin+1.7 dfit=gaussfit(x,dist,a)plot,x,dist oplot,x,dfit,color=20
A comparison of data analysis packages
CHEP2000 9-Feb 2000
A comparison of data analysis packages
CHEP2000 9-Feb 2000
A comparison of data analysis packages
CHEP2000 9-Feb 2000
Reading ntuples with IDLht2IDL - An Interface between HEP Data files and IDLAs part of our investigation of the Interactive Data Language (IDL) for use in our environment, we have assembled a prototype of what we call ht2IDL (for "hepTuple to IDL). The is a small package of C++ code and IDL procedure files which enable the user to access HEP data stores, such as HBOOK files, from the IDL session. It uses the HepTuple package from PAT.
How the package worksLike most modern tools, IDL provides the capability to interface with external functions written by the user. This is accomplished by writing some code, using a C-based interface, then compiling it and linking it into a shared-object file. Then, by creating some simple helper files for IDL, and starting IDL from the correct directory, where all of the new interface code lies, the user has access to all of the new functionality provided the written code and the IDL "External Interface" In our prototype, this was all accomplished on an SGI/IRIX system. In order to attempt to achieve maximum compatibility with the RunII environment, it was decided to use KCC. In principal there is no reason it should not work with CC or g++. Then, referring to the IDL External Developers' Guide, we wrote some code which uses the HepTuple library to read HBOOK files, load the data into data structures compatible with IDL, and then return them to the IDL session. We have written a prototype provides an interface to the HBOOK files (using HepTuple), makefiles and some documentation on how to use them, and sample IDL scripts (called "procedure" files) to invoke the ht2IDL functions and display and manipulate the results.
http://patwww.fnal.gov/pas/idl/ht2idl.html
A comparison of data analysis packages
CHEP2000 9-Feb 2000
Support Features
• Commercial products have excellent documentation, generally good support, but– you pay for it– hard to customize, usually don’t get source
• homemade products moving to free software support model (support by community) – can modify source to enhance or customize– relatively easy to use other’s code
• both require a local support organization
A comparison of data analysis packages
CHEP2000 9-Feb 2000
ROOT How To’s
A comparison of data analysis packages
CHEP2000 9-Feb 2000
Advanced Features
• Optimized I/O and very large data samples
• Using native user objects
• Customized GUIs
• Accessing over web
A comparison of data analysis packages
CHEP2000 9-Feb 2000
Optimized I/O
• Two separate issues:– data in memory vs. data on disk (efficient disk
access necessary for large data files)– can’t improve on disk speed unless objects that
are read together are next to each other on disk (column wise n-tuple and generalizations)
A comparison of data analysis packages
CHEP2000 9-Feb 2000
ROOT I/O
• Many years of struggle/experience to use disk based data
• optimized data formats for efficient access: CWNT--> split trees
• Formats designed with HEP type data access in mind
A comparison of data analysis packages
CHEP2000 9-Feb 2000
IDL I/O
• Basically memory based• Associated I/O allows mapping an IDL array or structure
variable onto a file:– I/O occurs automatically when the associated variable is
subscripted, accessing only the desired object– data set size limited by file size rather than memory size– direct access to each element in the file; including convenient
event selection by indexing– files can have multiple associated structures (full events,
tracks, hits, etc)– performance still limited by record structure
A comparison of data analysis packages
CHEP2000 9-Feb 2000
Access to user objects
• Root script language is C++, user classes can be used by interpreter if their header files are run through rootcint to create dictionary
• IDL supports structures, a collection of scalars, arrays and other structures. Needs an external structure definition file to allow use in commands; no automatic way to create these from class headers
A comparison of data analysis packages
CHEP2000 9-Feb 2000
IDL GUI BuilderAvailable in IDL 5.3, the IDL GUIBuilder enables you to build intuitive GUIs with drag-and-drop ease. A convenient control palette with icons such as radio buttons, checkboxes, and horizontal and vertical sliders let you quickly construct interfaces that users understand. Widget properties are easily editable. Pre-made bitmaps give you graphical cues for customizing buttons relevant to their function. Also, widgets are arranged in row and column geometry for on-screen consistency. At the code level, built-in comments help you understand what each widget and event will accomplish.
A comparison of data analysis packages
CHEP2000 9-Feb 2000
What Is ION?• An easy method for users to leverage the graphics and
analysis power of IDL in web based applets and applications
• Allows users to share IDL applications with non-IDL users
• Easy set-up, use and management
A comparison of data analysis packages
CHEP2000 9-Feb 2000
ION Overview
Client Machine
Client Machine
Web Browser
ION Client
Server Machine
Web Server
ION Server
IDL
Internet
ION Application
HTTP Data, Java Classes
IDL Commands,Graphic Primitives
A comparison of data analysis packages
CHEP2000 9-Feb 2000
ION Applications• Web publishing is obvious, but what else?• Applications based on ION
– Workgroups can develop and easily deploy data processing and visualization apps with ION
– Thin clients download fast and can be updated easily
– Applications can exist in any Java enabled machine and still access the power of IDL
A comparison of data analysis packages
CHEP2000 9-Feb 2000
Conclusions• Both satisfy user requirements• Commercial products offer all basic functionality
and many attractive advanced features• Homemade products still better optimized for
specific HEP use• Support models evolving (open source model)• Can we mix and match to get best of both
worlds?