Transcript
Page 1: A new physicalism that can accommodate experience

A new physicalism that can accommodate experience

Anand Rangarajan

University of Florida

Page 2: A new physicalism that can accommodate experience

The Problem of Experience

• Inadequacy of present day science to deal with consciousness.

• Varieties of materialism unsatisfactory.• Recent challenge from analytic philosophy

– Consciousness not logically supervenient on the physical (David Chalmers).

• Varieties of idealism, panpsychism, dualism now back on the table.

Page 3: A new physicalism that can accommodate experience

Approaches - a survey

• Materialism

• Emergence

• Dualism

• Idealism

• Dual-aspect theories

• Panpsychism

• ????

Page 4: A new physicalism that can accommodate experience

Logical Supervenience

• “Consciousness not logically supervenient on the physical,” Chalmers 1996.

• “Consciousness logically supervenient on the physical,” Stoljar 2006.

• Contradictory on the surface.

• Both point to a new physicalism.

Page 5: A new physicalism that can accommodate experience

A new physicalism

• Almost everything is logically supervenient on the physical.

• Exception: Experience.

• A Move: Construct a new physicalism that can accommodate experience.

• Explanatory gap: Why should the new physicalism entail experience?

Page 6: A new physicalism that can accommodate experience

A multiverse of possibilities

• All that physics specifies is a measure on a set of possibilities or possible worlds.

• Slogan: Multiverse as a quantum computer (Lloyd 2006).

• Without an additional mechanism, multiverse has only possibilities - no actualities.

• Decoherence not fully worked out.

Page 7: A new physicalism that can accommodate experience

Do possibilities exist?

• Elitzur-Vaidman bomb testing experiment

If bomb is a dud, only D detects photonIf only C detects the photon, bomb is not a dud

Destructive interference at C only because both possibilities exist

Page 8: A new physicalism that can accommodate experience

Phenomenology

• Pure experience prior to cognitive elaboration (Husserl 1910).

• Severely criticized by post-structuralism (Foucault ‘70).

• Myth of the given (Sellars ‘56).• Can phenomenology be separated from

point of view or perspective?• For us, no.

Page 9: A new physicalism that can accommodate experience

Perspectives

• Nietzschean and otherwise• Point of view• Conceptual frame of reference• Orients phenomenology - controversial.• Modal logic system S5 + perspectives (Hales)• Physical perspectives?

Page 10: A new physicalism that can accommodate experience

Perspectives and Content

• Given a set of possibilities and a measure on them, conceive of perspective as an operator.

• Perspectives operate on possibilities or possible worlds.

• Interaction generates experience (among other things).

Page 11: A new physicalism that can accommodate experience

A Conceptual Contrast

Perspectives Multiverse

Biased: Restricts set of possibilities

Unbiased: Allows all possibilities to exist

Local: Centered on here and now

Global: Possible spacetimes included

Top down: Operates on the multiverse

Bottom up: Informs all perspectives

Probability: Perspectives generate measure on possibilities

Possibilities: Multiverse generates possibilities

Page 12: A new physicalism that can accommodate experience

Foucault and Nagarjuna

• Scientific picture as construct

• Emergence of postmodern science?

• Shunyata as antidote to reification

• Emergence of tantra?

Page 13: A new physicalism that can accommodate experience

Perspectives and the Multiverse

• Need a “bottom up” physics to specify a measure on a set of possibilities or possible worlds: Check

• Need a “top down” physics to specify a set of perspectives to operate on the possible worlds: Check

• Each perspective has a point of view with actual phenomenal content: Experience

Page 14: A new physicalism that can accommodate experience

A Story

Subjects

Qualia/Intentionality

Objects

Properties/Processes

Perspectives

Phenomenology/Operations

Multiverse

Possibilities/Computations

Postmodernism and Quantum Gravity:“All that is Solid melts into Air”

We were once a simple, modern people

Is this PerVerse?

Page 15: A new physicalism that can accommodate experience

Discussion

• Perspectives operate on the multiverse• The multiverse informs perspectives• What are the relationships between the

multiverse and perspectives?• Perspectives supervenient on the multiverse:

Informationalism?• Multiverse supervenient on perspectives:

Relativism?• Non-reductive and circular relationship?

Page 16: A new physicalism that can accommodate experience

References

1. The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory, David J. Chalmers, Oxford University Press, 1996.

2. Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences, Michel Foucault, Routledge Classics, 2001.

3. The Fundamental Wisdom of the Middle Way: Nagarjuna’s Mulamadhyamakakarika, Jay L. Garfield, Oxford University Press, 1995.

4. The Disinterested Witness: A Fragment of Advaita Vedanta Phenomenology, Bina Gupa, Northwestern University Press, 1998.

5. Nietzsche’s Perspectivism, Steven D. Hales and Rex Welshon, University of Illinois Press, 2000.

6. Programming the Universe: A Quantum Computer Scientist Takes on the Cosmos, Seth Lloyd, Alfred A. Knopf, 2006.

7. Ignorance and Imagination: The Epistemic Origin of the Problem of Consciousness, Daniel Stoljar, Oxford University Press, 2006.

8. Integral Spirituality, Ken Wilber, Integral Books, 2006.


Top Related