Download - A Quick Review of IIRs in 2010
![Page 1: A Quick Review of IIRs in 2010](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062805/56814c61550346895db9841c/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
A Quick Review of IIRs in 2010A Quick Review of IIRs in 2010
Justin Goodwin: ETC-ACC Supported by EEA
![Page 2: A Quick Review of IIRs in 2010](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062805/56814c61550346895db9841c/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
OutlineOutline
• Some Simple Analysis
• Some Awards
![Page 3: A Quick Review of IIRs in 2010](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062805/56814c61550346895db9841c/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
IIRsIIRs
Why ?• Policy Makers the Public & Users of the data.
• Supports the data (NFR)• Explain Emission Trends• Understand areas needed for improvement
• Build Trust in the data• National System, QA/QC, KCA• Highlight Limitations (IE, NE, Uncertainties)• Understand Changes
• Makes Stage 3 Review Possible
![Page 4: A Quick Review of IIRs in 2010](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062805/56814c61550346895db9841c/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
IIRsIIRsWhat ?
• Transparency: including whether the data provided shows clearly the methods, assumptions and data sources used for the estimates.
• Completeness: ensuring that all anthropogenic sources of emission are included for which there are methods provided in The Guidebook
• Comparability: ensuring that emission estimates are compiled using similar and compatible methods across Parties and provided at a similar level of detail.
• Consistency: ensuring that data provided by a party has consistent data and assumptions across years and pollutants reported.
• Accuracy: assessment to ensure that uncertainties in emission estimates are minimised and that uncertainty analysis forms the basis of prioritising future improvements by the Party.
![Page 5: A Quick Review of IIRs in 2010](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062805/56814c61550346895db9841c/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
IIR Performance 2010IIR Performance 2010
Scoring:• 4 for Good • 2 for Moderate • 1 for limited • 0 for No Information
![Page 6: A Quick Review of IIRs in 2010](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062805/56814c61550346895db9841c/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Things I didn’t LikeThings I didn’t Like
• IIR template not followed• Organised by Pollutant
• Trend description mixed in with methodology section
• No overview of completeness or Accuracy
• Lack of Efs/AD/Method Description for Key Categories Country Specific Methods
• Not including all sector in IIR
![Page 7: A Quick Review of IIRs in 2010](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062805/56814c61550346895db9841c/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
IIR AwardsIIR Awards
• Most Comprehensive• Most Innovative• Best Looking• Best Country < 10m
![Page 8: A Quick Review of IIRs in 2010](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062805/56814c61550346895db9841c/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Nominations: Most ComprehensiveNominations: Most Comprehensive
• France• Croatia
• Includes projections in time series plots• Shows Targets in Trend analysis Plots• National Energy Balance
• UK• Good Coverage of almost all elements
• Denmark• Lots of Detail
![Page 9: A Quick Review of IIRs in 2010](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062805/56814c61550346895db9841c/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Nominations: Most InnovativeNominations: Most Innovative
• France• Ominea
• Germany• Wiki
• Portugal • F 9.1 Recalculation Plots• AD Plots in IIR
• Slovenia• Annotated trend graphs fig 2 etc
• Latvia• Fig 3.2 Key Category Plot• Transport Activity Plots
![Page 10: A Quick Review of IIRs in 2010](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062805/56814c61550346895db9841c/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Nominations: Best LookingNominations: Best Looking
• Germany• Wiki
• Netherlands• Fig 1.3, Trend Plots, Summary Tables, General
layout
• Finland• Maps & Plots
![Page 11: A Quick Review of IIRs in 2010](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062805/56814c61550346895db9841c/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Nominations: Best Country Nominations: Best Country (Population < 10m)(Population < 10m)
• Estonia• Cyprus• Croatia• Latvia