![Page 1: A short introduction to epidemiology Chapter 5: Measurement of exposure and health status Neil Pearce Centre for Public Health Research Massey University](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062717/56649e565503460f94b4edb0/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
A short introduction to epidemiology
Chapter 5: Measurement of exposure and health
status
Neil PearceCentre for Public Health
ResearchMassey University
Wellington, New Zealand
![Page 2: A short introduction to epidemiology Chapter 5: Measurement of exposure and health status Neil Pearce Centre for Public Health Research Massey University](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062717/56649e565503460f94b4edb0/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Chapter 5
Measurement of exposure and health status
• Exposure– Exposure and dose– Options for exposure
assessment
• Health status– Routine records– Morbidity surveys
![Page 3: A short introduction to epidemiology Chapter 5: Measurement of exposure and health status Neil Pearce Centre for Public Health Research Massey University](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062717/56649e565503460f94b4edb0/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Exposure and dose
Exposure: the presence of a substance in the environment external to the worker (external/environmental)
Dose: The amount of a substance that reaches susceptible targets in the body (internal)
![Page 4: A short introduction to epidemiology Chapter 5: Measurement of exposure and health status Neil Pearce Centre for Public Health Research Massey University](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062717/56649e565503460f94b4edb0/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Measures of exposure
• Intensity of exposure
• Duration of exposure
• Cumulative exposure
![Page 5: A short introduction to epidemiology Chapter 5: Measurement of exposure and health status Neil Pearce Centre for Public Health Research Massey University](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062717/56649e565503460f94b4edb0/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Options for exposure assessment
• Routine records
• Questionnaires
• Environmental measurements and Job-Exposure-Matrices (JEM)
• Quantified personal measurements
• Biomarkers
![Page 6: A short introduction to epidemiology Chapter 5: Measurement of exposure and health status Neil Pearce Centre for Public Health Research Massey University](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062717/56649e565503460f94b4edb0/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Data sources useful for developing a job-exposure matrix
• Industrial hygiene sampling data
• Process descriptions and flow charts
• Plant production records
• Inspection and accident records
• Engineering control documentation
• Biological monitoring results
![Page 7: A short introduction to epidemiology Chapter 5: Measurement of exposure and health status Neil Pearce Centre for Public Health Research Massey University](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062717/56649e565503460f94b4edb0/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Asbestos concentrations (fibers/cc) in job categories at an asbestos textile plant
Job category
1930-35
1936-45
1946-65
1966-75
General area
10.8 5.3 2.4 4.3
Card operators
13.3 6.5 2.9 5.3
Clean-up 18.1 8.8 4.0 7.2
Raw fiber handling
22.8 11.0 5.0 9.0
![Page 8: A short introduction to epidemiology Chapter 5: Measurement of exposure and health status Neil Pearce Centre for Public Health Research Massey University](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062717/56649e565503460f94b4edb0/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Example of an employment record
![Page 9: A short introduction to epidemiology Chapter 5: Measurement of exposure and health status Neil Pearce Centre for Public Health Research Massey University](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062717/56649e565503460f94b4edb0/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Example of an exposure history
Job
Years
Exposure
Cumulative exposure
Card operator
1933-35 10.8 32.4
Card operator
1936-38 6.5 41.9
Clean-up 1939-45 8.8 103.5
Clean-up 1946-48 4.0 115.5
![Page 10: A short introduction to epidemiology Chapter 5: Measurement of exposure and health status Neil Pearce Centre for Public Health Research Massey University](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062717/56649e565503460f94b4edb0/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
South Carolina asbestos textile worker study
• South Carolina asbestos textile workers
• N=1261
• white males
• followed 1940-1975
• Exposure: fibers/cc days (thousands)
• Outcome: lung cancer (35 cases)
![Page 11: A short introduction to epidemiology Chapter 5: Measurement of exposure and health status Neil Pearce Centre for Public Health Research Massey University](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062717/56649e565503460f94b4edb0/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Employment history of a worker
Year 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67
Exposure 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.6 0.1 0 0 0
Cumulative 0.1 0.2 0.6 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3
exposure
Cumulative <1 <1 <1 1+ 1+ 1+ 1+ 1+
exposure
category
![Page 12: A short introduction to epidemiology Chapter 5: Measurement of exposure and health status Neil Pearce Centre for Public Health Research Massey University](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062717/56649e565503460f94b4edb0/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
South Carolina asbestos textile worker study
• A separate record is created for each person-year of follow-up
• We get a file with 32,354 person-years and do a cross-tabulation of exposure and the potential confounders
![Page 13: A short introduction to epidemiology Chapter 5: Measurement of exposure and health status Neil Pearce Centre for Public Health Research Massey University](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062717/56649e565503460f94b4edb0/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
South Carolina asbestos textile worker study (32,354 person-years)
Exposure category
------------------------------------------------------------
Age <1 1-9 10-39 40-99 100+
<50 11134 10721 3575 589 62
50-54 964 1024 633 228 27
55-59 570 583 408 226 16
......
Total 13146 12823 4976 1270 139
![Page 14: A short introduction to epidemiology Chapter 5: Measurement of exposure and health status Neil Pearce Centre for Public Health Research Massey University](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062717/56649e565503460f94b4edb0/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
South Carolina asbestos textile worker study
• A separate record is created for each death, classifying the death in the same manner as the person-year in which it occurred
• We get a file with 35 deaths and do a cross-tabulation of exposure and the potential confounders
![Page 15: A short introduction to epidemiology Chapter 5: Measurement of exposure and health status Neil Pearce Centre for Public Health Research Massey University](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062717/56649e565503460f94b4edb0/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
South Carolina asbestos textile worker study (35 deaths)
Exposure category
------------------------------------------------------------
Age <1 1-9 10-39 40-99 100+
<50 3 2 1 0 0
50-54 1 2 3 3 1
55-59 0 0 3 3 0
......
Total 5 10 7 11 2
![Page 16: A short introduction to epidemiology Chapter 5: Measurement of exposure and health status Neil Pearce Centre for Public Health Research Massey University](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062717/56649e565503460f94b4edb0/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
South Carolina asbestos textile worker study
We can then calculate age-standardised lung cancer death rates:
- SMRs (comparison with national rates)
- SRRs (comparison with lowest
exposure category)
- Poisson regression can be used to estimate rate ratios (comparison with lowest exposure category)
![Page 17: A short introduction to epidemiology Chapter 5: Measurement of exposure and health status Neil Pearce Centre for Public Health Research Massey University](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062717/56649e565503460f94b4edb0/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
South Carolina asbestos textile worker study
Exposure Person Rate
group Deaths years ratio 95% CI
<1 5 13146 1.0 -
1-9 10 12823 1.9 0.6-5.5
10-39 7 4976 2.0 0.6-6.3
40-99 11 1270 6.8 2.3-19.3
100+ 2 139 8.8 1.6-47.3
![Page 18: A short introduction to epidemiology Chapter 5: Measurement of exposure and health status Neil Pearce Centre for Public Health Research Massey University](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062717/56649e565503460f94b4edb0/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
South Carolina asbestos textile worker study
0123456789
10
<1 1-9.9 10-39.9 40-99.9 100+
![Page 19: A short introduction to epidemiology Chapter 5: Measurement of exposure and health status Neil Pearce Centre for Public Health Research Massey University](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062717/56649e565503460f94b4edb0/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Biomarkers
• Exposure
• Early disease
• Individual susceptibility
![Page 20: A short introduction to epidemiology Chapter 5: Measurement of exposure and health status Neil Pearce Centre for Public Health Research Massey University](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062717/56649e565503460f94b4edb0/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Biomarkers of exposure
• The concentration of the substance of interest
• The concentration of products of biotransformation
• The biological effects of exposure
(Armstrong et al, 1992)
![Page 21: A short introduction to epidemiology Chapter 5: Measurement of exposure and health status Neil Pearce Centre for Public Health Research Massey University](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062717/56649e565503460f94b4edb0/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Successful uses of biomarkers
•Human papiloma virus DNA
•Hepatitis B virus and liver cancer
•Aflatoxins and liver cancer
The most successful uses historically have involved acute effects of exposures; successful uses in studies of chronic effects have primarily involved biological agents
![Page 22: A short introduction to epidemiology Chapter 5: Measurement of exposure and health status Neil Pearce Centre for Public Health Research Massey University](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062717/56649e565503460f94b4edb0/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Current limitations of biomarkers
• Historical exposures
• Individual temporal variation
• Study size
![Page 23: A short introduction to epidemiology Chapter 5: Measurement of exposure and health status Neil Pearce Centre for Public Health Research Massey University](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062717/56649e565503460f94b4edb0/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Measuring historical exposures
“A typical case-control study of cancer and chemical exposure could not rely on [DNA-adducts]. The relevant exposures occur many years before disease diagnosis, and any DNA adducts from the relevant exposure period will probably have disappeared or be indistinguishable from adducts formed more recently” (Wilcosky and Griffith, 1990)
![Page 24: A short introduction to epidemiology Chapter 5: Measurement of exposure and health status Neil Pearce Centre for Public Health Research Massey University](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062717/56649e565503460f94b4edb0/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Individual temporal variation
• The variation in exposure levels within an individual (because of day-to-day differences in exposure) may be greater than the variation between individuals
![Page 25: A short introduction to epidemiology Chapter 5: Measurement of exposure and health status Neil Pearce Centre for Public Health Research Massey University](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062717/56649e565503460f94b4edb0/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Study size
• The use of biomarkers may severely limit the size of a study; thus, any gains in validity (from better exposure information) may be offset by losses in precision
![Page 26: A short introduction to epidemiology Chapter 5: Measurement of exposure and health status Neil Pearce Centre for Public Health Research Massey University](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062717/56649e565503460f94b4edb0/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Inherent limitations of biomarkers
• What does a biomarker measure?
• Increased likelihood of confounding
• Public health implications
![Page 27: A short introduction to epidemiology Chapter 5: Measurement of exposure and health status Neil Pearce Centre for Public Health Research Massey University](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062717/56649e565503460f94b4edb0/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
What does a biomarker measure?
• Exposure or biological response (or disease process)?
• One biological response to one chemical
• Individual response to exposure (individual metabolism)
![Page 28: A short introduction to epidemiology Chapter 5: Measurement of exposure and health status Neil Pearce Centre for Public Health Research Massey University](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062717/56649e565503460f94b4edb0/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Increased likelihood of confoundingExample: PAH exposure in a factory
Method of classification
Level of “exposure
Environmental levels in workplace
High Medium Low
PAH-DNA adducts High Medium Low
![Page 29: A short introduction to epidemiology Chapter 5: Measurement of exposure and health status Neil Pearce Centre for Public Health Research Massey University](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062717/56649e565503460f94b4edb0/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Classification based on environmental levels in the workplace
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Low Medium High
Workplace exposureOther exposures
![Page 30: A short introduction to epidemiology Chapter 5: Measurement of exposure and health status Neil Pearce Centre for Public Health Research Massey University](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062717/56649e565503460f94b4edb0/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Classification based on PAH-DNA adducts
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Low Medium High
Workplace exposureOther exposures
![Page 31: A short introduction to epidemiology Chapter 5: Measurement of exposure and health status Neil Pearce Centre for Public Health Research Massey University](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062717/56649e565503460f94b4edb0/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Increased likelihood of confoundingExample: PAH exposure in a factory
Method of classification
Level of “exposure
% smokers
Environmental levels in workplace
High Medium Low
Medium Medium Medium
PAH-DNA adducts High Medium Low
High Medium Low
![Page 32: A short introduction to epidemiology Chapter 5: Measurement of exposure and health status Neil Pearce Centre for Public Health Research Massey University](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062717/56649e565503460f94b4edb0/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Public health implications
• Technology defines the “problem”
• Regulation is (or should be) based on environmental exposure levels
• Dangers of interventions based in individual susceptibility
![Page 33: A short introduction to epidemiology Chapter 5: Measurement of exposure and health status Neil Pearce Centre for Public Health Research Massey University](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062717/56649e565503460f94b4edb0/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Biomarkers, epidemiology and public health
• Relevant to only some of the major public health problems
• In the situations in which they are relevant, biomarkers have both strengths and limitations and are often inferior to more traditional methods of exposure assessment
![Page 34: A short introduction to epidemiology Chapter 5: Measurement of exposure and health status Neil Pearce Centre for Public Health Research Massey University](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062717/56649e565503460f94b4edb0/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Chapter 5
Measurement of exposure and health status
• Exposure– Exposure and dose– Options for exposure
assessment
• Health status– Routine records– Morbidity surveys
![Page 35: A short introduction to epidemiology Chapter 5: Measurement of exposure and health status Neil Pearce Centre for Public Health Research Massey University](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062717/56649e565503460f94b4edb0/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Routine records
• Death registrations
• Disease registers (e.g. cancer, congenital malformations, occupational disease notifications
• Health system records (e.g. hospital admissions, general practice records)
• Health insurance claims
![Page 36: A short introduction to epidemiology Chapter 5: Measurement of exposure and health status Neil Pearce Centre for Public Health Research Massey University](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062717/56649e565503460f94b4edb0/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Morbidity surveys
• Standardized questionnaires– The ISAAC childhood asthma questionnaire– Quality of life questionnaires– The Medical Outcomes Study Short Form (SF-
36) • Physiological measurements
• Lung function testing• Biological measurements
• Serum testing (e.g. hepatitis B)
![Page 37: A short introduction to epidemiology Chapter 5: Measurement of exposure and health status Neil Pearce Centre for Public Health Research Massey University](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062717/56649e565503460f94b4edb0/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
How Do We Decide Which Is the Most Valid Measure to Use?• The “gold standard” is to give all study
participants a full clinical examination• Survey instruments can be compared to
the “gold standard” in terms of their:– sensitivity– specificity– Youden’s Index– positive predictive value
![Page 38: A short introduction to epidemiology Chapter 5: Measurement of exposure and health status Neil Pearce Centre for Public Health Research Massey University](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062717/56649e565503460f94b4edb0/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Sensitivity and Specificity
“Gold standard”
Yes No
Instrument Yes a (Sensitivity)
1-b
No 1-a b (Specificity)
![Page 39: A short introduction to epidemiology Chapter 5: Measurement of exposure and health status Neil Pearce Centre for Public Health Research Massey University](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062717/56649e565503460f94b4edb0/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Validation of Survey Instruments
• Sensitivity = a• Specificity = b• Youden’s Index = a + b -1• All these three measures have a range of
0 to 1 (Youden’s Index can be less than 0, but only if the sensitivity and specificity are worse than would be obtained by chance with a random definition)
![Page 40: A short introduction to epidemiology Chapter 5: Measurement of exposure and health status Neil Pearce Centre for Public Health Research Massey University](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062717/56649e565503460f94b4edb0/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Validation of Survey Instruments
• Suppose that we are doing a survey in a population in which the true prevalence is P
• The observed prevalence is:aP + (1-b)(1-P) = P(a+b-1) + (1-b)
![Page 41: A short introduction to epidemiology Chapter 5: Measurement of exposure and health status Neil Pearce Centre for Public Health Research Massey University](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062717/56649e565503460f94b4edb0/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Validation of Survey Instruments
If we compare two populations, then the observed prevalences are:P1(a+b-1) + (1-b)P0(a+b-1) + (1-b)
the observed prevalence difference is:
(P1-P0)(a+b-1)
Youden’s Index indicates the reduction in the true prevalence difference due to misclassification
![Page 42: A short introduction to epidemiology Chapter 5: Measurement of exposure and health status Neil Pearce Centre for Public Health Research Massey University](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062717/56649e565503460f94b4edb0/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Validation of Survey Instruments
• In population-based prevalence surveys, Youden’s Index is the most appropriate measure of validity
• In etiologic studies (e.g. cohort studies, case-control studies), the positive predictive value is also important. However, a “severe” and restrictive definition of asthma may have a good positive predictive value, but the findings may not be generalisable to other asthmatics
![Page 43: A short introduction to epidemiology Chapter 5: Measurement of exposure and health status Neil Pearce Centre for Public Health Research Massey University](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062717/56649e565503460f94b4edb0/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Example: Jenkins et al (1996)
• 361 children in Melbourne given ISAAC questionnaire
• 93 adults in Melbourne given similar questionnaire
• Bronchial challenge with hypertonic saline
• Interviewed by pediatric respiratory physician and diagnosed with “current asthma”
![Page 44: A short introduction to epidemiology Chapter 5: Measurement of exposure and health status Neil Pearce Centre for Public Health Research Massey University](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062717/56649e565503460f94b4edb0/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Sensitivity Specificity Youden’s Index
Symptoms 0.80 0.97 0.76
BHR 0.39 0.90 0.29
Symptoms + BHR
0.37 0.99 0.36
Example: Jenkins et al (1996)Findings in Adults
![Page 45: A short introduction to epidemiology Chapter 5: Measurement of exposure and health status Neil Pearce Centre for Public Health Research Massey University](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062717/56649e565503460f94b4edb0/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Example: Jenkins et al (1996)Findings in Children
Sensitivity Specificity Youden’s Index
Symptoms 0.85 0.81 0.66
BHR 0.54 0.89 0.43
Symptoms + BHR
0.47 0.94 0.41
![Page 46: A short introduction to epidemiology Chapter 5: Measurement of exposure and health status Neil Pearce Centre for Public Health Research Massey University](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062717/56649e565503460f94b4edb0/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
A short introduction to epidemiology
Chapter 5: Measurement of exposure and health
status
Neil PearceCentre for Public Health
ResearchMassey University
Wellington, New Zealand