Transcript
  • 1. Advances in Telesurgery and Surgical Robotics Dr Sanjoy Sanyal MBBS, MS (Surgery), ADPHA, ADHRD Presented at 9 thNational Medical Dental Conference in Seychelles, February 2006

2. Preface (added 2009)

  • This PPT represents developments in the field during late 90s and early 2000s, in:
    • Stanford University School of Medicine
    • University of California Berkeley (UCB)
    • UC San Francisco (UCSF)
    • Massachusetts Inst. of Technology (MIT)
    • Escort Heart Institute Research Centre (EHIRC), New Delhi, India
  • Telesurgery / surgical robotics has advanced considerably now.

3. The research pioneers

  • Stanford Research Institute (SRI) @ Stanford University School of Medicine
  • Human Machine Systems Lab (HMSL) @ MIT
  • Robotic Intelligent Machines Laboratory (RIML)@ UC Berkeley
  • Robotic Telesurgical Workstation for Laparoscopy (RTWL) @ UCSF

4. Worlds first telesurgery

  • September 2001 : Tele- chole
  • Prof Jacques Marescaux , New York & European Institute of Telesurgery, Strasbourg
  • Round distance =14,000 km
  • Round Trip Time= 200 msec; video and hi-speed fibre-optic link
  • June 2001 : Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore & Rome Policlinico Casilino University
  • http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/1552211.stm

5. Background

  • Traditional surgery
  • Tri-dimensional
  • Cognitive input
  • Tactile feedback
  • Stereoscopic vision with depth perception
  • Time lag -ve
  • Telesurgery
  • Two-dimensional
  • Cognitive feedback limited
  • Tactile feedback ve
  • Binocular vision without depth perception
  • Time lag +ve

6. Definitions

  • Telepresence surgery : Computerized interface @ surgical workstationremote operative site; force feedback (haptic)
  • Cooperative telesurgery : tele-surgeon / local (remote) assistant cooperation
  • http://www2.telemedtoday.com/articles/telesurgery.shtml
  • http:// web.mit.edu/hmsl/www/Telesurgery /

7. Definitions contd

  • Telerobotics : Remote control with a robotic arm, in conjunction with a laparoscope
  • http://www2.telemedtoday.com/articles/telesurgery.shtml

8. Definitions contd

  • Telementoring : Experienced surgeon acts as tutor / instructor ( preceptor ) for remote surgeon via interactive video
  • Teleproctoring( proctor=supervisor of exams ): Documentation of performance for privileging purposes
  • http://www2.telemedtoday.com/articles/telesurgery.shtml

9. Technical aspects

  • Image transmission : T1 transmission (H-320 compression standard)
    • Fibre-optic cable
    • Microwave
    • Satellite
  • Lag time : should be 1mm
  • Haptic : Force feedback

10. Haptic

  • Force reflection / feedback; Graduated tactile input
    • resistance at remote site is transmitted to near site by servo motors @ both sites

11. Robotic vs. human arm

  • DOF : Number of ways an arm can move
  • Human arm : 7-DOF
  • Human hand : >20-DOF
  • Robotic arm : Like human hand, arm and moveable elbow - butwith a fused wrist
  • Robotic arm : 4-6 DOF

12. Telesurg dynamics @ MIT

  • Surgeons fingers placed in rings of instruments
  • Rings are connected tomotors ,gearsandbelts
  • Precisely translate surgeons hand / finger motions into digital signals
  • Transmitted through computer- telecomm link
  • To robotic arms @ remote surgical station
  • Visual input : 2 remote CCD cameras (15 fps each-> 3-D effect )-> Surgeons monitor -> Mirror -> Optical3-D glasses (stereoscopic vision)

http:// web.mit.edu/hmsl/www/Telesurgery 13. Telesurg components @ MIT 14. Surgeons master tool handle @ MIT 15. Surgeons master tool handle @ MIT 16. Master phantom haptic interface arm 17. Slave phantom haptic interface arm 18. Tele-operation slave tool 19. Tele-operation slave tool 20. Tele-operational details Tool 21. Tele-operational details Interchangeable tool tips 22. Experimental task - grasp / transfer 23. Experimental task - Grasp and transfer with orientation 24. Experimental task - Clip application 25. Experimental task grasper / gripper and shear / scissors 26. Lap experiment box @ MIT 27. Lap simulator-1 @ MIT 28. Lap simulator-2 @ MIT 29. Dynamics of robotics @ UC

  • Surgeon remote location TV console set of handheld controls ~ videogame joysticks
  • Joystick :Pencil-sized; 1 for each hand
  • Computer : Program translates surgeons movements
  • End-effectors : Robotic instruments enter body to perform actual operation
    • Early models : 3-fingered hand
    • Present : Hydraulic-powered, single-digit, 3-4 x , 4-jointed (rotate, swivel, to-fro), 2-pronged end grasper
  • Anthropomorphicmovements

http:// robotics.eecs.berkeley.edu /medical/ 30. Details of robots

  • Robo-doc : 2 robots working in concert
    • Holding robots
    • Companion robots / milli-robots / robotic manipulators

31. Holding robots

  • Pair of large robotic arms
  • Hydraulic-actuated
  • Sits on moveable platform
  • Driven remotely by surgeons joysticks
  • Performs like a surgeons shoulder, allowing positioning of its hydraulic arms

32. Holding robots contd

  • Holds 2 ndrobot, wheels instruments into position by patients side
  • Guides them through dexterity-requiring surgical procedures (suturing, dissection)
  • Holds instruments steady while surgeon sutures and ties knots

33. Companion / Milli-robots / Robotic manipulators

  • Sterile, disposable, steel, mm-scale, fingertip-sized
  • Slender, jointed, finger-like tools
  • Connected by wires and tubes to larger robot
  • Pair of gripping forceps at one end to carry surgical tools
  • Contains miniscule video-camera

34. Companion robot contd

  • Inserted into body for actual surgical tasks (cutting, suturing) 10-20 mm incisions
  • Inserts cameras
  • Provide tactile feedback though force-deflecting joysticks
  • Provides 7 DOF

35. Setup @ UC Berkeley 36. Equipment @ UCB 37. Robotic manipulator @ UCB 38. Mini robot controls @ UCB Roll-pitch-roll wrist, gripper and multi-fingered manipulators 39. Robotic endo-manipulator Endo-platform with biopsy forceps 40. Minute threading 41. Threaded robotic instruments knot tying 42. 2-G RTWL @ UCSF In a joint project betweenRIMLofUCBandDepartment of SurgeryofUniversity of California San Francisco( UCSF ), aRobotic Telesurgical Workstation for Laparoscopy (RTWL) was developed 43. Lap interface @ UCSF 44. 4-DOF lap haptic interface 45. Robotic Cardiac Surgery @ EHIRC

  • Escort Heart Inst. Research Centre in New Delhi, India
  • Implemented da Vinci Tele-manipulationsystem
  • Intuitive Surgical Inc., Mountain View, CA, USA
  • Computer enhanced system
    • Surgeons console
    • Cart-mounted robotic manipulators
    • http://www.ehirc.com/individuals/services/treatment/robotic_surgery.html#

46. Surgeons console @ EHIRC

  • Display system : 3-D pictures of chest cavity
  • Surgeonsits at console and gets 3-D view of chest interior
  • Hand motions are captured, transformed and transmitted to tiny robotic manipulators

47. Robotic manipulators @ EHIRC

  • Robot is not autonomous; surgeon-controlled
  • Hold tiny instruments, which go inside the patient's chest.
  • Surgeon's hand movements transmitted to these instruments
  • CABG, mitral valve repair, ASD closure

48. IMA LAD CABG 49. Totally endoscopic CABG

  • Advantages
    • Only 3-incisions, each 1 cm on the side and lower chest
    • Less pain
    • Faster healing and recovery
    • Short hospital stay

50. Technical innovations

  • Teletactation (Tactile feedback)
  • CyberGlove with CyberTouch
  • Dextrous master glove
  • Spatial cognition Hand assist
  • Surgical simulations / Virtual reality
  • Dextrous mini-robots

51. Teletactation Tactile feedback

  • Sensing tactile information throughtactile sensorsthat transmit feel of tissue to surgeons finger

52. CyberTouch CyberGlove

  • Vibro-tactile, thermal simulators on eachfingerandpalm
  • Tactile feedback optionenables feelof virtual object

53. CyberGlove

  • Flexible sensorsmeasure position/movementoffingersandwrist

54. Dextrous master glove

  • Thumb ,index ,wristflexion sensors and wrist rotation sensor
  • Senses positionsof surgeon's fingers/wrist
  • Used as master to drive slave robotic hand

55. Spatial cognition Hand assist in telesurgery Non-dominant hand in-vivo possibly enhances spatial skills through tactile cues, which generate a more accurate 3-D representation of anatomy 56. Lap chole simulation Simulated fat and fascia Dissected away; cystic duct clipped 57. Lap chole simulation contd Cystic artery and duct divided successfully in simulated conditions 58. Karlsruhe Gynec endo surgery simulations 59. Gynec surgery simulations contd http://www- kismet.iai.fzk.de/VRTRAIN/phD_main.html http://www- kismet.iai.fzk.de/VRTRAIN/GIF/PHD/surgSim.jpg 60. Dextrous mini robots

  • 1 Camera attachment
  • 2 Equipped with a needle for biopsy
  • 3 Moves around abdominal cavity spiral pattern moves without slipping
  • http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/4647258.stm

61. Summary

  • Technically demanding, labor intensive, time consuming, expensive research
  • Learning curve with similar characteristics
  • Expensive installation, maintenance and infrastructure

62. Future applications

  • Emergency trauma care
    • 1 stGolden Hour
  • Battlefield surgery
  • Remote area assistance
  • One-to-many telementoring
  • Space station surgery

63. Cutting edge research today, surgical technology tomorrow 64. Conclusion

  • Science knows no country, because knowledge belongs to humanity, and is the torch which illuminates the world . Louis Pasteur
  • Don't be afraid to take a big step. You can't cross a chasm in two small jumps .
          • David Lloyd George

Top Related