Transcript
Page 1: advertising photography in vogue magazine -1930.pdf

•ARG HIVE-

RI ichard Avedon's first published photographs—adver-

Itisements for New York's Bonwit Teller department store—

appeared in Vogue in late 1944 and 1945. From that one client

and that one important magazine, his commercial reputation

(and income) quickly soared. Avedon's success has additional

significance when viewed against the work of others whose

photographs also appeared in the ad pages of Vogue, such as

Gjon Mili, George Hoyningen-Huene, and George Platt Lynes,

whose art images are part of the canon but whose commercial

work has been lost. Similarly, advertising work by Horst P. Horst,

Erwin Blumenfeld, and Diane and Allan Arbus, all featured in

Vogue, is often talked about, but rarely seen.

SHOT OUT OF THAdvertising Photography in

Each issue of Vogue opened with several dozen pages of ads;

nearly the same number of editorial pages followed; a back

section printed ads and text side by side. In effect, at midcentury

(from the 1930s to the 1950s) Vogue published two magazines

back to back: the first was filled with pictures of dresses, shoes,

coats, furs, stockings, makeup, and even cars you could buy. The

following pages showed new fashions from Paris and New York,

alongside articles on beauty, travel, art, and good living. (The ratio

has changed in the intervening years: according to the marketing

firm Fast Horse, of the September 2011 Vogue's 758 pages, 584

were ads—that is, around 75 percent of the issue.)

Given the importance that magazines played in the history of

twentieth-century photography, it is remarkable how little we know

about these ad images. Before the 1970s, modernist art history's

proscriptions kept anything commercial or colorful out of the canon

(for many years color photography was closely associated with

commerce). Today's liberal art marketplace has made nearly all

photographs valuable—as long they can hang on a wall. But the

ephemeral nature of magazine advertisements, which appeared

only on the printed page, makes them unreliable exhibition material,

with little value to dealers and collectors. Historians of photography

have to scramble for sources: until the late twentieth century.

Magazine, 1930s-1950sphotographers suppressed attention to their commercial efforts,

believing that only unpaid, personal work had lasting value.^

Yet from a practical point of view, commercial photographs are the

most important of all, because they pay for everything else. In 1960,

cultural historian Raymond Williams called advertising "the official

art of modern capitalist society. . . . It commands the services of

perhaps the largest organized body of writers and artists, with their

attendant managers and advisers, in the whole society."^

Among those "managers and advisers" were the many art directors

who wielded influence throughout the magazine industry. None had

more power than Alexander Liberman, who learned his trade in

Paris in the 1920s and '30s at Vu magazine, pioneering journal of

the illustrated press, then started at Vogue in 1941, was appointed

art director in 1943, and would serve as editorial director of Conde

Nastfrom 1962 until his retirement in 1994. During his long tenure,

THIS PAGE: Riciiard Avedon, advertisement for Swansdown, Vogue,

September 1 , 1955; OPPOSITE, CLOCKWISE FROM TOP LEFT:

Richard Avedon, advertisement for Warner's corselettes. Vogue,

August 1 ,1956 ; John Rawlings, advertisement for Enka Rayon, Vogue,

February 1 , 1 9 5 1 ; George Platt Lynes, advertisement for Henri Bendel,

Vogue, September 1 , 1948; Richard Avedon, advertisement for

Miron Woolens, Vogue, August 1 5 , 1 9 5 3 .

62 / www.aperture.org

Page 2: advertising photography in vogue magazine -1930.pdf

CANONBY MARY PANZER

« win maiíolin. ipp.ava! PI . B.nJil Original Sui. whit!) fiUK«

cktl Ut* (rom ihi boyf it Et«n, cspi il» twftii (rom but beiux.

color bitndi... bluT, red or sollt wilh

/70. 2o5 aperture / 6g

Page 3: advertising photography in vogue magazine -1930.pdf

Liberman kept all the magazines up to date, but never

let the visual focus of the editorial pages stray from

the content his readers had paid to see. At Vogue,

every feature, from Irving Penn's studio photographs

of haute couture to Frances McLaughlin-Gill's

sportswear shots made on a plantation, preserved

the illusion that readers were staring through a

transparent wall at a world that looked remarkably

real. As writer Dawn Powell acidly observed in

1963, Vogue had one overriding function: "to provide

delicious discontent. Here is what other people

have and you haven't; here is where some go and

never you. Here is the lovely land of never, and

you may dream of it, but that's all."='

Overall, Vogue's advertising carried far more

variety and more innovation than its editorial section.

Throughout the 1940s ad pages included work by

artists such as Salvador Dalí, Christian Bérard, and

René Bouché. Cultural taboos challenged artists and photographers

to sell brassieres, girdles, and negligees without inspiring the "wrong"

kind of desire. Vogue staff photographers, such as John Rawlings,

Toni Frisseil, and even Penn, made plenty of ads, adhering to editorial

rules—a useful strategy for advertisers, who could be confident that

their pages would compete successfully with editorial for viewers'

attention. And ads from department stores, fabric companies and

manufacturers, and dress manufacturers show that advertisers used

Vogue to reach the whole garment trade, not just retail customers.

Vogue's ad pages also featured work by Harper's Bazaar staff

members, such as Louise Dahl-Wolfe and Lillian Bassman.

Familiar styles stand out. Mili applied multiple exposures to ads

for Saks Fifth Avenue. Dayton's of Minneapolis bought Blumenfeld

double spreads that required readers to physically rotate the

magazine into a long vertical. Frissell photographed her friends for

Garfinkel's in Washington, D.C. Lynes's surrealist-inflected images

appeared for years at the opening of Vogue as full-page ads for New

York department stores such as Henri Bendel, Bergdorf Goodman,

and Bonwit's (before Avedon took that client away). Using stark,

surreal settings he delivered surprising images with the freedom

and implausibility of dreams.

Even in such sophisticated company, Avedon's originality comes

through. Every frame is tense with contrast between dark and

light, slim and full, real and artificial. Most notably, his models

are not actors behind glass. They occupy a different world, where

it's always breezy, and there's always something going on—like a

man outside the frame reaching in to hand a woman flowers. This

world is a frank fantasy, but the price of entry is within reach— just

buy a dress made of Enka Rayon. (Or buy one for your customers

to find at the store.)

Access to this material has just grown much easier. In late 2011

Conde Nast launched a digital archive of Vogue. They scanned more

than four hundred thousand pages, every issue from 1892 to today,

and cataloged them using information from the original images

and captions; you can search by photographer, model, designer,

advertiser, and more. Less fun (and less dusty) than leafing through

the actual pages—this is also much more expensive: an annual

subscription to the digital archive costs around $1,500.

But whole careers can be uncovered, and missing chapters

added to others. The canon will not change much. However, we can

now begin to follow the history of photography along a narrative

motivated by dollars and common sense.©

NOTES

•• Important reading on this subject includes: Patricia Johnston, Real Fantasies:Edward Steichen's Advertising Photography (Berkeiey: University of CaliforniaPress, 1997), and Micheie H. Bogart, Artists, Advertising, and the Borders ofArt (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995).

= Raymond Wiliiams, "The Magic System," New Left Review 1, no. 4 (Aprii1960); repr. In Simon During, ed.. The Culturai Studies Reader (London andNew York: Routledge, 1993), pp. 421-22.

^ Dawn Poweii, "Lovely Land of Never," New York Times, November 3, 1963,Book Review.

THIS PAGE: Diane and Allan Arbus, advertisement for Burlington Mills,

Vogue, February 1 , 1949; OPPOSITE, CLOCKWISE FROM TOP LEFT:

Gjon Mili, advertisement for Saks Fiftii Avenue/Anthony Blotta, Vogue,

March 1, 1 9 5 1 ; Louise Dahl-Wolfe, advertisement for La Cross Naylon,

Vogue, February 1 5 , 1 9 4 7 ; Richard Avedon, advertisement for Enka

Rayon, Vogue, March 1 , 1 9 5 3 ; Lillian Bassman, advertisement for Gelier

Shoes, Vogue, January 15, 1957.

All magazines photographed by Tom Hayes

/ www.aperture.org

Page 4: advertising photography in vogue magazine -1930.pdf

IE SURPLICE-OR-SWEEP COAT: AnHiony Bloila's '.51 venion of Hie goJdon fleece, to lei flow or to wrop and pinion by

hond via Q front-and-center pockei. Incorporaling oil Hie dominent Ihemes of t*iis Spring, shaped, îlide-up ileeveî, elegont

Eilk raffeta ir,terior, the lush texture ol Fantmonn', fleece in freshly coined gold. 10 to 14, 285.00- Coat Colleclions.

SAKS FIFTH AWENUE

I.A CitOSS HAi\D.S YOU A >E\S IDK.4

.MHV„,,,,M.„.W)607V

sf í

ENKA RAYON

no. 2o8 aperture / 6ß

Page 5: advertising photography in vogue magazine -1930.pdf

Copyright of Aperture is the property of Aperture Foundation and its content may not be copied or emailed to

multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users

may print, download, or email articles for individual use.


Top Related