![Page 1: Analysis Tools for Numerical Simulations of Estuaries Parker MacCready University of Washington NANOOS PI Meeting 2/1/2006 Newport, OR](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070305/5514cfb755034640138b5ffa/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Analysis Tools for Numerical Simulations
of Estuaries
Parker MacCreadyUniversity of Washington
NANOOS PI Meeting 2/1/2006 Newport, OR
![Page 2: Analysis Tools for Numerical Simulations of Estuaries Parker MacCready University of Washington NANOOS PI Meeting 2/1/2006 Newport, OR](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070305/5514cfb755034640138b5ffa/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Motivation
• The initial scope of my part of the NANOOS Pilot was to develop “quality” metrics.
• This is relatively straightforward, and is already being done as part of the CORIE system.
• => I have put my effort into developing useful metrics that:– (1) We are able to compute because we have
the full 3-D fields calculated by the numerical simulations
– (2) Give insight into the function of the system
![Page 3: Analysis Tools for Numerical Simulations of Estuaries Parker MacCready University of Washington NANOOS PI Meeting 2/1/2006 Newport, OR](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070305/5514cfb755034640138b5ffa/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Progress
• Metrics related to time-dependence (adjustment time and sensitivity) developed (theory, a simple numerical model, and comparison with observations) and submitted to J. Phys. Oceanogr.
• Metrics related to flow of mechanical energy in the system developed and presented as a talk at ERF 2005.
• Draft write-up of “Analysis Tools” done in December 2005. I am now working with Antonio and his Master’s student on implementing them in the CORIE system.
![Page 4: Analysis Tools for Numerical Simulations of Estuaries Parker MacCready University of Washington NANOOS PI Meeting 2/1/2006 Newport, OR](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070305/5514cfb755034640138b5ffa/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Quasi-steady response of the length of the salt intrusion to
varying QR• This is a “classical” metric, which we know observationally
for a number of estuaries• It can be distilled into the exponent in a power law relating
the length of the salt intrusion to the river flow
![Page 5: Analysis Tools for Numerical Simulations of Estuaries Parker MacCready University of Washington NANOOS PI Meeting 2/1/2006 Newport, OR](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070305/5514cfb755034640138b5ffa/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Consider the effects of time-dependence
• Estuaries take time to adjust to their forcing conditions.
• The ratio of the adjustment time to the forcing timescale can strongly affect whether or not the estuary “feels” the effects of a given change in forcing
• Example: Stratification is generally MORE sensitive than you would predict from a quasi-steady theory, whereas the length of the salt intrusion is LESS sensitive.
![Page 6: Analysis Tools for Numerical Simulations of Estuaries Parker MacCready University of Washington NANOOS PI Meeting 2/1/2006 Newport, OR](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070305/5514cfb755034640138b5ffa/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
The Mechanical Energy Budget
• By evaluating terms in the volume-integrated, tidally-averaged energy budget, we may better understand how an estuary “works”
• In this example the long residence time is a consequence of the huge reservoir of potential energy stored in the length of the salt intrusion
![Page 7: Analysis Tools for Numerical Simulations of Estuaries Parker MacCready University of Washington NANOOS PI Meeting 2/1/2006 Newport, OR](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070305/5514cfb755034640138b5ffa/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Conclusion
• The advent of realistic 3-D numerical simulations of estuarine circulation and salinity structure (and eventually ecosystems) gives us much greater ability to develop metrics to describe and compare these systems.