Download - Anti-Crisis by Janet Roitman
-
7/27/2019 Anti-Crisis by Janet Roitman
1/28
ANTI-CRISIS
JANETROITMAN
-
7/27/2019 Anti-Crisis by Janet Roitman
2/28
anti-crisis
janetroitman
dukuvyp duhdld
2014
-
7/27/2019 Anti-Crisis by Janet Roitman
3/28
2014 Uvt t vd
td t Utd Stat ma ad- pap
pt Saa ad Oat Imat Stm, I.
La C Cata--at ata
Rtma, Jat L. (Jat L)
t- / Jat Rtma.
pa m
Id apa ad dx.
isbn 978-0-8223-5512-0 (t : a. pap)
isbn 978-0-8223-5527-4 (p. : a. pap)
1. C (p)
2. C ( E d)
3. Ht, d21t t. I. t.
b105.c75r65 2013
302.17d23 2013024847
m t pap pa v
a It t Y
Wtt : avd Gat
1970 S/ATV llc. t admtd
S/ATV llc, 8 Sqa Wt,
Nav, N 37203. t vd. Ud pm.
Duke uniVersiTy Press grATeully AcknowleDgesThe suPPorT o The new school, which ProViDeD
unDs TowArD The PublicATion o This book.
-
7/27/2019 Anti-Crisis by Janet Roitman
4/28
for leonore and harry roitman
-
7/27/2019 Anti-Crisis by Janet Roitman
5/28
am, t t p . . .
breAD, a It t Y
at, pap, a t ma at t.
H a a ma at t a 1800 t
tt at, tt tt, tt a,
tt ptt, tt pa.
VirginiA wool, A Room o Ones Own (1929)
-
7/27/2019 Anti-Crisis by Janet Roitman
6/28
contents
x dmt
1 inTroDucTion Wat I at Sta?
15 chAPTer 1 C mad
judgment day
the moral demand
the test
41 chAPTer 2 C Naatv
bubbles
houses
finance
subjects
71 chAPTer 3 C: Ra!noncrisis narration
the crisis that does not obtain
91 conclusion am
97 Nt
133 R
153 Idx
-
7/27/2019 Anti-Crisis by Janet Roitman
7/28
acknowledgments
a pp pd m t . Idd, I d av
v p t pjt ad t m md ad t t
ata , St, a , ad a Ra, a
m tad ad ad t pjt p a. ata
Poon, Ann Stoler, and Mary Murrell passed along every crisis text
t d. ata pd m t p m md t matatt ad t a pjt tat md t dam. S ad mad
dat, xad t -ma, datd v d, ad pd
m t t pjt vat t ma pata dav
aadm ad d. H mmt ad dt apt 2 ad 3
are especially appreciated; but, overall, this book benets enormously
m ata a; t a d t av t am
project without her consistent support and her constant, searching
a. I xp m appat tta vv t
pa tat . St mmdat t tt
t pjt, t t t qtv ad d-
tinctive manner o nurturing the projects and people that seem to
v ad m ad . S ad ma dat, aa a-
ing incisive questions, always insisting on clarity and clarication.
Her reservations and her comprehension helped me to keep this
pjt v , ad t t t t. pjt am
-
7/27/2019 Anti-Crisis by Janet Roitman
8/28
xiiacknowledgments
a ta, a, t t amt ad pmpt a
, azd a pa Sta C t m
t 2011 ma tp at mt, pd
m t tat t q a t a t a t md. H -
tvt ad t ad t a aa d d-
a m. d, a v, a Ra pptatd t tat tat
ad m t pat a a pa t pjt: at ad a
dat v a , xatv a, td tam
t pjt a a t mpt, ad t ad, t aa-
tt t, Bt at t at?
I at t xp mm attd t B a ad t
dat mapt m tat t , ptt t qt tme, and or giving me good advice, all o which made or a more
thoughtul nal version. Im also very grateul to Orit Halpern, Jay
Bernstein, Richard Bernstein, Gil Anidjar, Nicolas Langlitz, Ruth
Marshall, Charles Piot, Tobias Rees, Julia Elyachar, and Robin Wagner-
a t ad dat; v m p mmt, -
t, ad ; d t pjt t m d-
t v. Spa, am ta t m a t
anthropology department at the New School or Social ResearchAnn Stoler, Lawrence Hirscheld, Hugh Raes, Miriam Ticktin,
Na Latz, jaat Raa m av a t-
at t pjt, t tmv a tm t
at t a t d , t aa ttd, ad v-
tably with humor. The graduate students at the New School have been
qa ttd ad a, pa t patpatd
t ma I tat tp atd t t pjt, t p
t a ad ad tm pap, ad a
at m. Im dtd pa t Rad I
ta d at ad , pad, ppa
t dx, p m ta, ad ttt adv.
O course, over the past ew years, many others have motivated
ad pd m t pjt: Ca, Ja G, dam -
t, j ppada, t at Ca Bd, Ja Cma,
John Comaro, Peter Geschiere, Doug Holmes, Stephen Collier, Pault, m aa, Ca Wa, da amd, Bat Fa-
-
7/27/2019 Anti-Crisis by Janet Roitman
9/28
acknowledgments xiii
kel, Nicolas Dodier, Frdric Keck, Elisabeth Clavrie, Luc Boltan-
, Cat , Ja-Fa Baat, Bat H, ad m-
nique Malaquais (who, in a phone conversation in 2007, said, Its
the anti-crisis!). I owe very sincere thanks to Craig Calhoun, Sam
Cat, ad Ja C, xpta t m
d m tm a a Sa--Rd at t Ittt
Knowledge, New York University, where much o this manuscript was
tt. a t Fd t ad avd Y a vpd -
mt t. d t t d t a . . .
I have beneted rom exchanges with participants in many con-
erences and seminars, including: Reworking Political Concepts.
A Lexicon in Formation, the New School or Social Research andCma Uvt St F; tat Std W-
shop, Duke University; The Stakes o Crisis, American Anthro-
p at; at Ct, cnrs-nyu; U-dpd
Encounters: Science as a Terrain o Postcolonial Interaction be-
t a ad Ep, t Uvt Gt ad Cat U-
versity o Leuven, University Foundation, Brussels; Department o
Anthropology and Sociology, Swarthmore College; Anthropology
patmt, Uvt Ca; Rt Em t-pology: A Human Centred Approach, Economic and Social Research
C (UK), patmt tp, Ld S E-
nomics; and the Franz Boas Lecture Series, Anthropology Depart-
ment, Columbia University. Some o the material published herein
appad pv C, Political Concepts: A Critical Lexicon:
ttp://.ptapt./2011/.
K W a a dt tt ad a a d-
t. I ta m aat t m t pjt t t
anticipation and reassurance. I also want to express appreciation to
t am v t mapt; t t ad
ad d qt dpa t m. d ta a
t Ezat t ad t pat.
I cant ever suciently express my gratitude to Grard Roso or
tat matt at at (Ma petite entre-
prise / Connat pas la crise.Bashung). Thanks to him or aordingtm ad pa, da t limpatience de la libert. d -
-
7/27/2019 Anti-Crisis by Janet Roitman
10/28
xivacknowledgments
d ta t Eva R ad Ra R t t-
, am, d, tdt, mpt . . . pat t m.
a t v .
ddatd t L ad Ha Rtma, t
f ad t d, ad t at.
-
7/27/2019 Anti-Crisis by Janet Roitman
11/28
introduction
what is at stake?
NormalcyNever Again
MArTin luTher king r.
Nma, Nv a t tt t p pd a ad-
d t dvd at Lt K J. t tp t L-
ma t 28, 1963. at da, v, at LtKing Jr. deviated rom his NormalcyNever Again text, instead
mpv at a t I Hav a am p. I
ad t a, a tt f add t v da
tda Jaa 15, 2009. Fv da at, dp
K a ad dam t Wat a, Baa Oama,
jt atd a t t-t pdt t Utd Stat,
dd tmpa ma t tm : W a
t mdt .
L K ma, v, Oama d t aat-
z a mmt t a t ma a a, at a-
atzd a a j. j, dd Oama tm
t ad a, ta a a t pta t a -
m ad pta jt. d t, at v a vt
t ta at m t, j d, t-
tdOama addd a qa: a t dat ,he said, subject to data and statistics. Less measurable but no less
-
7/27/2019 Anti-Crisis by Janet Roitman
12/28
2introduction
pd a app d a ada a a
that Americas decline is inevitable, and that the next generation
mt t t. H t dd: t
condencethe knowledge that God calls upon us to shape an uncer-
ta dt. S d t a tat mp tat
t ta ta, pap ttt, a tata
j, , a td d, a matt f p,
promise, and grace: With hope and virtue, let us brave once more
t t ad d at tm ma m. Lt t ad
our childrens children that when we were tested we reused to let this
j d, tat dd t t a dd at; ad t
xd t z ad Gd a p , ad tthat great git o reedom and delivered it saely to uture genera-
t. C a ta vt a m a t a d d-
tion of lie and even the grounds or a transcendent human condition.
Obama noted in his address that the lived experience o what is
dmd d t dd t a m -
nomic indicators. He sought to convey to the American public that
d a t pt dt f a ta a experi-
ence o crisis. His secular narrative of human history is conjugatedt a Cta aatv t. d t t a -
described secular accounts in the social sciences that attempt to relate
t a t a aatzd as ; t a tat
a a ad t in ; ad t a tat m
a mpatv, a dv dtad t at tv
situations that belie, or the actors, a sense o possibility (Mbembe
ad Rtma 1995). Bt t qt a: dat
mt m ta a ta jt, at t tat
tat tm? H dd , a a ta, dv m-
ment, come to be construed as a protracted historical and experiential
dt? v da a a dt t a
tat aa. Bt a pa a tat d ? I t
t a xm?
I t p t tat t tm a t mt mm ad
mt pvav qa tmpa ta dtadmanner o denoting history itselthis book sets the stage or a gen-
-
7/27/2019 Anti-Crisis by Janet Roitman
13/28
introduction 3
a q t t tat a t ad t-
ing and thereore oers a departure, not a resolution.3 In what ollows,
I am t d t tz t tm t m p t a
working denition of it. Rather than essentialize it so as to make better
f t, I t dtad t d t tm
t d t tt aatv m. L, I am
t d t dmtat tat mt
tmpa aatv at tat t a a v tat a
t f da. I t a v t tat ,
I tmpa a t tm a
ad a a t, m t ma.
What I will consider is how crisis is constituted as an object od. C a mpt amt a m a-
rative today; it is mobilized as the dening category of historical situa-
t, pat ad pt. t ap t a
and popular press is vast; crisis texts are a veritable industry.5 The
ap a m t d ap cnn-t:
ata, a, Ia, Iaq,
t C, Ca, t dd Eat, a
Stt. Bt d a pt, qa t v ato events: humanitarian crisis, environmental crisis, energy crisis,
dt , aa , ad t. t tm ,
the singularity o events is abstracted by a generic logic, making crisis
a tm tat m -xpaat. I p t ma a at
, v a t -mat tmpa t-
cal narrative; it is a non- locus rom which to claim access to both
t ad d f t. I t d, mzd
aatv tt t ma t t dat mmt
tt; t ta t a ma t a ta tt, ad v a
ma t t t t. S mmt tt a t d-
d a t pt t, d a ta vt
are decided, thus establishing a particular teleology. And similarly,
t m tt t t, mmt a
dd a ta matvt ad a, a t
contingent or partial quality of knowledge claimsprinciples, sup-pt, pm, ta, ad a aa ata d-
-
7/27/2019 Anti-Crisis by Janet Roitman
14/28
4introduction
puted, critiqued, challenged, or disclosed. It ollows that crisis is
posited as an epistemological impasse and, as we will see below, is
claimed to ound the possibility or other historical trajectories or
v a () t.
Baa Oama vd t vat p t a:
a a mmt tat va tt, t dtd t mt
t t -ad aa dvd ad a
value and oered the hope o reestablishing or relocating true value,
at t t a t damta t m ad
the proper trajectory of history, both being dependent on adequate
d am. a at dt a mmt tt t
a, ad dpt pmpt tat d t mp, t, adt dt a, t tm a dat
t pt; t mp a ta t a t vta, t
mt t mpt, dtd tad a m. Ev ta
t a m a t q a mpaatv tat jd-
mt: mpad t at? at qt v t a
a a axa pm, t qt t pt-
ma ta d ta dma f ad tt.
This book inquires into the signicance o crisis in-and-o-itsel. In-tad tat t pata t a, t a-
cial crisis, the crisis o subjectivity, the neoliberal crisisand then
t xpa t a ad damt, I t a qt
t pt t. d , I xp t
am t a ta pt: I a av t tat a
a t-ppa pt ad I a pat tat v
premise in narrations of history and in the determinations o what
v t a t. xp t tdx t -
vta tap t tm ad t qta pat
I take an impudent and somewhat puzzling step. In the pages that ol-
, mt p t Rat K ad Rt S, ma
H ad avd Hav, J L ad a L, t a-
d ad t d d maa. W t m pp
and prognosis to risk-based pricing and adjustable rate mortgages,
m pa t at , m jdmt ad -tq t ad aa. W mv t t p-
-
7/27/2019 Anti-Crisis by Janet Roitman
15/28
introduction 5
ta t ad t pat aa, m t-
ap t tmpa aa t. t xpa
t . Itad, at a dat v t v-
ta at t m a a t-ppa
pt ad xamat f tat pt t patd
tmpa at aa , pmtt ad a
ta aat ad v t ta qt, t t t.
W mt aa aat ad m a t a
aware o the historico- philosophical status o the term crisis, this
book indicates that the lines drawn between academic and popular
aat a t a d a pmd. attmpt
t a, at at t, t . It d ptt paacademic analyses o nancial crisis and so-called popular accounts
aa . I 20079, a t d t
am tat t d t a z aadm aa,
dd mt, t, pta tt, ta, ad
atpt, a attmpt t xpa t . It -
spired a host of journalistic and novelistic accounts o the nancial
crisis o 20079. A cross-reading o these literatures gives insight
t t ta at t aa m -dm , tt, tat dad t, dpt t mta -
tt aatv tat a ad m t dzz vat
at (L 2012). Idd, t v dtt t xpt ad
a ta jt pt tat a t ta. W,
ta, d da t t xpt ad ap, aa-
demics and commoners? Accountants and corporate managers are
t a aadm mt, t a t dd ap-
sons with respect to nancial analysis? Are lawyers, engineers, and
matmata pvat aa m aat
to be considered laypersons in contrast to academic economists and -
nancial analysts? Are economic anthropologists housed in universities
ap at t t a m dpatmt?
O mt p tat t a ap a t d mt-
a, t av d p. Bt v , t da
da t aadm ad a mt ad. I -at, a atd aat a atp t tm-
-
7/27/2019 Anti-Crisis by Janet Roitman
16/28
6introduction
porary, Paul Rabinow explains and illustrates the mode o adjacency
necessary to anthropological inquiry, the goal o which is identiying,
dtad, ad mat mt ata neither by directly
identiying with it nor by making it exotic (2008, 49, my emphasis).
He notes the disjuncture between those authorized to pronounce
pptv p at ad t a tt, t a,
aa aat ad jat, t ad, ad m,
on the other. And he concludes (79): Thus, while many o the serious
speech acts about the moral landscape are produced by actors who are
tv at t pt, t atpt a appa
t d ad pat t a t. t, p-
losophers, ethicists, scientists, and the like can thus qualiy or in-clusion in the category that used to be called natives. While the
pt t ad atpa d t pa-
titioners o crisis analysis, it takes its cue rom Rabinows sense o
untimely work. I suspend judgment about expert claims to crisis
so as to see how those very (expert) claims and (lay) accession to
those claims serve not radical change, as expected with crisis, but
rather the armation of long-standing principles, thereby preclud-
ing certain thoughts and acts, such as the outright reutation o thevery idea o oreclosure a a ma vad pt ad at.
ta t t tap t pt ad -
t tptat at a t pm mta
, xavat t ptma a ta am (t
) ad t p t am d ta tp
o action or practice (devaluation, oreclosure) and not others (human
ptt-a ad m, t da t v t t
tm ad aa). I tat a, t t
t t ppd v (Ra 2008, 47) t
producing everish crisis pronouncements, urgent crisis analyses,
and clamorous crisis pamphletsout o step with those seeking to
maa vm t .
Both Martin Luther King Jr. and Barack Obama attempt to inaugurate ta tm t t t pt . -
-
7/27/2019 Anti-Crisis by Janet Roitman
17/28
introduction 7
dmptv ad tpa qat t ta aat pa t
t matv ad ta at t pt , ,
ta t t d t t ma ad tq,
td a t d tamatv at, a
mad a .
at t a vd a a
historical conceptas both a particular entry point into history and as
a ma t va ta ttma a ptd
a t t. I t d, t a , t
ta t mmat t a at, v a t tm
tat a t v aat t. d
t pt a aat ad t t-tt ad aat f t tf t t t at Gma
ta Rat K, at pap t pta
history o crisis, which thus serves as the authoritative historiography.
I t dta t apt tat , K pvd
a tat t tmpazat f t, t m
t a a tmpa at. H attt t m t
at f t a a tmpat t t mtat dpamt
o the term crisis, arguing that, by the end o the eighteenth century, t a t am tat a jd t ma
o a diagnosis o time. Koselleck likewise maintains that both this
am ad t jdmt ta a p ta
a consciousness that posits history as a temporality upon which one can act.
F t ta , a t at t
a t; a, tat t; ad
crisis designates history as such. In this way, crisis achieves the
tat a t-ppa pt; t t ma
t atd, zd, mpdd, ad v ptd.
I ta Rat K maa pta t
t datv t pat t pt . H at
how crisis achieves status as a historico-philosophical concept like-
tat t pat t pm , t v
a set of interlocking determinations: what counts as an event, the
tat a vt, t qaat f t t, ad t a narration. I reer to Kosellecks conceptual history on two registers: as
-
7/27/2019 Anti-Crisis by Janet Roitman
18/28
8introduction
t tdx tap t tm ad a a at tat, t,
pata a vta pat f tap, pp-
p ta at t a a vt ad pm a t at a
be narratedor the means to distinguish between a properly histori-
a at at ad a ta ata att-
a at (Wt 2002, x). L d t t qt
t t K d t m f ta
t aat, I d tad t qt
ohow the term crisis is positedas undamental to this very idea o
ta ad t a mtap f t. pt
t tat a m a ttd a aat; m
am t a qt at t tat t pt a ad tm t aat t p t
the ultimate locus o signicance and the ontological status of histori-
a tmpat ta atd. I t pat, a a
m K, d a jdmt: jd tm tm
o analogous intervals and judging history in terms of its signicance.
Bt t qa v xptat d-mmat jt, t
at tat t t tmat m f jdmt. I a -
pd K ad t ptt t qt t m, a : at t d p jdmt?
B a p, I d t m tq tat a -
a dd aat. Ctq ad a -
at, a Rat K (1988) md : t a
a ad ta t. B d t t at (tq), t
pt dt t pva ad a pa tat
t d aatd tm f t pptat d
pv a da t ta vt ad ptat
t vt. C-am v a ma dmad a d
t t pat ad t t. d -am v t p-
t m f ta jtvt, tap t d-
terminations o the limits o reason and knowledge. That is, crisis,
or the disclosure o epistemological limits, occasions critique. This
d (tmpa) d dd a ad d
as a moral task or an ethical demand, being based on a perceiveddpa t at ad a, ta dvpmt ad
-
7/27/2019 Anti-Crisis by Janet Roitman
19/28
introduction 9
ma pt, d ad ma tt, tttd at-
gories and epistemological limits, or a critical consciousness o the
pt tat aa. N matt t qat, t dpa ta
t a apa; t ta t ma a pt .
d a a, t p ad t v app f t
a dd t atv pat a mmat d: what
went wrong? For critical historical consciousnessor the specic,
ta a f t d a tta -
cance is discerned in terms o epistemological or ethical ailure. With-
out an inviolate transcendental realmGod, reason, truthrom
which to signiy human history, or because observation takes place
m t mma, tv am a atv pat t mmat d.
B xavat t tm t tq-ad- at,
ma t -ttt, I p t da attt t t ma
by which crisis serves as a distinction or transcendental placeholder in
t pat a mmat d. I t d f Wam Ra
(2002, 20), pd Na Lma, I a d dp-
t pat ad at t att a a t a
at t att Gd, t m t ta-dental placeholder.11 As we will see below, crisis serves as a transcen-
dta pad a t a ma t;
t a tm tat ad a t t t t.
t d t t tm , Ra pt m pt d-
parture clearly: I . . . moral codes (commandments), Holy Scripture,
papa ad a dt, ad t v ppt ad va
dv dt vd t tadt am, t at
become historicized and seen as socially constructed artiacts, the
task o reclaiming authority must be negotiated within the domain
a mma tat a d m t tadt a-
a. d a t , t t d t. How that other-
wise is to be thoughtm t qa-tadta ta a m-
ma t t t t (Ra 2000, 130, m mpa).
pt a t t t t. d
a a tm tat v t pat v ppd dtadt, at, t a dtt tat tad pp-
-
7/27/2019 Anti-Crisis by Janet Roitman
20/28
10introduction
t ad dtm. , t dat at-:
t t v , t a vd
empirically; rather, crisis is a logical observation that generates mean-
a -ta tm, a - m t
t ad paadx. d t jdmt a
a post hoc interrogation: what went wrong? Crisis is posited as an
a p; t d d a t qtd
mad xpt. d tmpa aatv d
t qt: H a know t? d a
know t ?
Crisis is a historical super concept (Oberbegrife) (Koselleck 2006,
392) that, to my mind, raises questions rather than acilitating an-
swers. I crisis denotes a critical, decisive moment, or a turning point,
d t t mp a ta pp f t? d at d t
ta t pt t v da tat ma tt a a tat
o crisis? Moreover, when crisis is posited as the very condition o
tmpa tat, t t t a tat ta qt -
m p t a d? xp tqt.
d , ma a t v t ax ta a-
at. t vat: v aadm ad
nonacademic observers themselves observe economic and nancial
at, t ma ad ta, t at, d, ad -
tpt a av pdd . W v, t, t d pt
d-d vat. v, t t v t pa-
tice o crisis in contemporary narrations o the 20079 nancial
crisis, we see how accession to crisis engenders certain narrations
ad t t tm a ad va d q-
t. t v a t t aatv aa
, I am t t ta t atv vat t a-
t; I am t ttd t t ta pptd x-
paat t a m ta. t I d x-
p qt at t t pdt va ad , ad tstatus o subprime and houses, I do so only insoar as these terms
-
7/27/2019 Anti-Crisis by Janet Roitman
21/28
introduction 11
ttt t amma aa aatv. pt t
ad t aatv t t dtm t t a t d-
p t t ta t t t t aa.
pt t dmtat t tm ta t -
dt p t ad t dat t a d pt
a aatv tt.
W t ta a j t a d-a aa f tp-
tat, a am a pata tadt: a m,
-Ka, -axt, ta td, ad ta m.
pd m t qt, at t ? a -
, , t, a, a . . . av t at
, a tm tat ptd tt qt dt. tdmtat dvat m t pp f t ad dt-
tions in human knowledge and practicethe discrepancy between
t d ad ma d t d. C a p-
ptd va am t t a, t ad, ad
what is variously portrayed in the accounts reviewed below as cti-
t, , a a dpat m t a, t t.
The chasm signies a supposed dissonance between empirical his-
t ad a pp f tt t dd matava, t ad, ad ptta jdmt ad vaat,
on the other.1 What is at issue is our alienation rom history and
the potential or revelation o true value and the true signicance
vt dmpt, mapat, dva. I a: a
we claim to represent that chasm? What is the basis o a claim to
know the locus o our alienation rom underlying value, rom ma-
ta va, m a va, m tt va?
To conclude this expedition over the terrain o crisis narration, I
pt a t pata pamat qt t t aatv tat I
v : W d a dt (at) m a dt (tx at)?
H d dt t m m t att? At what pointd
d a qt m d a a dt? At what pointd
pm mta d tam m a at t a at? d
t tmat qt: W d t jdmt ta? W
see, by putting these questions to contemporary crisis narratives, howcrisis, in itsel, cannot be located or observed as an object o rst-
-
7/27/2019 Anti-Crisis by Janet Roitman
22/28
12introduction
order knowledge. The observation money is a rst-order observa-
t ad a dtt (m/t m); t tatmt I t
m Lt m a a d-d vat.
t-d vat (m) d t dat t dtt
(money/not money) was made; and the distinction (how the obser-
vat a mad) a t jt a d-d va-
t. Bt ta t a a dtt, a a d-d
pat, d t amt t d . The point is to take note
o the eects o the claim to crisis, to be attentive to the eects o our very
accession to that judgment. C d ta m tq,
ptz tt p. a pt . Wd t
, f t tv tad, d t m tq xt-ing relations and practices, but rather occasion the reorganization and
transormation o the very boundary between the economic and
the political, and, more signicant, the transormation o the very in-
telligibilityo constitutive terms, such as debt, liquidity, and risk?
I am a a pt dpat, ma d a
pt . W a a, t Op Wa Stt mv-
ment, who should bear the burden o ading prosperity? But other
tttv qt, atd t t pdt tv pat,ma atatd, a, dd dt m t d a a
at a t t pa?
a t att qt, I t t t td t p-
duction o value through market devices and nancial inrastructures
tat p t at t ecacy o economic and fnancial prac-
tices, ta t pdt vafgured as debt. H, -
tad aa d t ata pat, pt t,
erroneous policy, aulty regulation, deective models, missed ore-
casting, or systemic ailure and underlying contradictions, we have
an accounting o specic practices and the production o positiveor,
tt, patad, tat t am t m
a pata (pta) t t at dad a pm -
ta dma f . a vat t pdt -
nomic and nancial value without positing crisis help us to grasp how
a am at vaat ta a jdmt atva. Bt at at ta a dtt atatv
-
7/27/2019 Anti-Crisis by Janet Roitman
23/28
introduction 13
aat a a t d t pvd vd aat X at
a t pv am Y at . I tat ,
m t t t at a tt xpmt: t x x-
p t d aatv tt , t t a t at-
atv xpaat a t t jt. t, t
tt xpmt pd t pm ma
or the belie that there is a discrepancy between history and repre-
tat f ta a t a t pt aat
t t. Bt I at t d tat tq ad
a at, ad at t t attt t m
tq dd aatv. W tat t m
tq t ampt at at t mat a shouldt ad t at jt at
dvat m t mat aa va pdd;
t d t at t a tat va pdd t
t pa. I t d, ptd a a a p, t -
vat at positive, pragmaticpa aatv pt. I
t a t pt aatv ad xp
possible, alternative narratives about houses and their worth might be
atd tt t a (B 1991, 12),tt tt a pt aatv dat pt
jdmt dvat ad a.
Ultimately, I invite the reader to put less aith in crisis, which
ma a at at ta t -ad--t. C
a tm tat d p t pdamt ma -
t, t v a a tadta pad t -
t t tat pm. I tat , t tm v a a p-
mary enabling blind spot or the production of knowledge. That is,
a pt v, a vat, tf t vd
vd. I appd t pt t t mtap
a d pt a t appd a a vat tat, a
vat t, d t at t v dt
of its observation.1 Consequentially, making that blind spot visible
ma a qt at pd a -
v. t at, t ma a at pd t. tmt, t ma a mt tt at tt d-
-
7/27/2019 Anti-Crisis by Janet Roitman
24/28
14introduction
cerning historical signicance in terms o ethical ailure. Thus we
mt a: at d aatv d pdd ma
t v a pm? a t tat qt, matt
mpa, a , q, a a t, aa
tp, dat t a , a a a d
pt t pdt f d, ta mtt ad t
mpt jdmt at at, ad a tat mt
adatd ad, vdt p, vm.
-
7/27/2019 Anti-Crisis by Janet Roitman
25/28
notes
introduction: what is at stake?
1. The various NormalcyNever Again drats, the nal text penned by Martin
Luther King Jr., and conjecture about his reasons or deviating rom the pre-
pared speech can be ound in Hansen 2005.
2. Transcript: Barack Obamas Inaugural Address, delivered January 20, 2009,
Washington, DC, accessed January 20, 2009, http://ww.npr.org/templates/story>php?storyld=99590481&ps=cprs.
3. This book is not intended as an exhaustive account o the social science litera-
ture and will be primarily concerned with contemporary narrations o nan-
cial crisis.
4. Starn (1971) and Beckett (2008) undertake two helpul reviews o the term
crisis. Starn considers the epistemological status o crisis in the tradition
of Western academic historiography. Beckett shows how crisis has been the-
matized in Haiti in relation to a wider discursive eld in which the notion o
decline is dependent upon ideas o progress held to obtain outside o Haiti,most notably in the global North. See also Parrochia 2008 and Shank 2008,
both o which review the concept o crisis or social science theory and his-
torical studies, respectively.
5. Reerencing this bibliography would take up an inordinate amount o space,
as would the notation o recent conerences dedicated to explaining the
crisis, impulsively staged by universities, think tanks, and periodicals. The
extensive bibliography on contemporary fnancial crisis is reerenced below.
For a ascinating screen- based art installation on the term crisis, which uses
live news eeds, data processing, and typographical imagery to visualize howthe replication o the term generatesand does not merely reecta particu-
-
7/27/2019 Anti-Crisis by Janet Roitman
26/28
98notes to introduction
lar situation, see Katie Levitts Poetical Crisis, http://katielevitt.wordpress.com
accessed March 25, 2008.
6. This project started with Arica in 2006. At that time, nancial crisis was not
my object o thought. The question I put to mysel was: how can one think
about Aricaor think Aricaotherwise than under the sign o crisis? AsI have written elsewhere (Roitman orthcoming), although the Arican con-
tinent is designated and conjured under the sign o crisis, this is not a diag-
nostic o a continent. It is a diagnostic of history as such. In the same way that
our contemporary history is qualied as humanitarian crisis, environmental
crisis, nancial crisis, et cetera, and is thus given ontological status as his-
tory through these terms, Arica is posited as an ontological category o
thought under the sign o crisis.
7. A ull bibliography o these literatures is noted below. I am using 20079
as an indicator, reerencing the fnancial crisis reerred to by Barack Obama,or what is sometimes more specifcally called the subprime mortgage crisis,
even though some o this literature was produced slightly beore or ater that
time period.
8. Rabinow is interested in designing inquiry. He does not take anthropology
to be ethnography understood as a practice developed to analyze a specic
type o objectthe culture and/or society oethnoiso as to contribute to a
specic genre, the monograph (or journal article). Instead, the practice o
anthropology entails the dynamic and mutually constitutive, i partial . . . ,
connections between gures oanthropos and the diverse, and at times incon-sistent, branches of knowledge available during a period o time; that claim
authority about the truth o the matter; and whose legitimacy to make such
claims is accepted as plausible by other such claimants; as well as the power
relations within which and through which those claims are produced, estab-
lished, contested, deeated, armed, and disseminated (2008, 4). It should
be noted that Rabinow reers to a disjuncture between the moral landscape
inhabited in daily lie and the moral landscape as reected upon by those
authorized to pronounce prescriptive speech acts about it (2008, 79). How-
ever, he also underscores the complex subject positions of his natives, suchas molecular biologists working on genome mapping who are likewise prac-
ticing Christians or scientists o a molecular science laboratory who hold cre-
dence in the category o race. The object of inquiry is the ethical practices
entailed by such lives. And in the process o that inquiry, one is adjacent to
both the universal intellectual typical to the academy and the specic intel-
lectual, who inhabits expert worlds (see 3350). C. Rabinow 2003.
9. This statement summarizes various ways o construing the possibility or and
aims o critique, which are spelled out with reerence to specic scholars, in
chapter 1.10. See Rasch 2000 and 2002.
-
7/27/2019 Anti-Crisis by Janet Roitman
27/28
notes to introduction 99
11. For Luhmann, this necessarily contingent world is signied by the term
modernity. Though characterized by the loss o an outside, or loss o an
outside reerence point, Luhmann does not see this situation o necessary
contingency as a problem, or a loss to be lamented or condemned. C. Luh-
mann [1992] 1998, 2002; and Rasch 2000. Though he does not consider theterm crisis, my thinking is inspired by the work o Niklas Luhmann, dis-
cussed below.
12. This statement smacks o an idealist or constructivist position, which states
that there is no knowledge-independent reality. See 3739 o this book or
clarication. In particular, at least or my rendering o crisis as a logical ob-
servation, see Luhmann 1990a; Christis 2001; and Rasch 2012. But more
generally, c. Rorty 1979; Bernstein 1983; Hacking 1999; Latour 2003; and
Meillassoux 2008, among others.
13. The concept o a philosophy of history denotes the process necessary or thenarration o the passage o time as history, which abides a selection principle
that distinguishes between reality and an account o reality. See 2231 o this
book; and reer to White 1973 and Munz 1977.
14. This notion o observation, inspired by Luhmann, is developed below. In a re-
view o the inuence o Spencer Brown and Foerster on Luhmann, Jac Chris-
tis (2001, 334) states this quite plainly: So, on the rst level, observers simply
observe (a table). No observer can observe how he observes (the distinction
between table and chair) at the same time as he observes what he observes.
Only in a second-order observation can we indicate the distinction used in afrst-order observation. This obviously means that the how o a frst-order ob-
servation becomes the what o a second-order observation. See also Fuchs
1996, 323, cited by Christis. Luhmanns point is not that all rst-order opera-
tions are empirical, as in a radical empiricists view. Observation is a matter o
undamental contingency: Observation is any kind o operation that makes
a distinction so as to designate one (but not the other) side. Such a denition
is itsel contingent, since what is dened would have another meaning given
another distinction (1998, 47). The real is what is practiced as a distinction
(see chapter 1, 3739) and the contingent nature o rst-order operations isnot problematic; one can note, quite simply, that any rst-order observation
can be qualied as contingent by a second-order observer, ad innitum.
15. The mere act o posing these questions is a orm o critique insoar as the
ormulation o a question potentially posits the possible limits of knowledge.
Though not ocusing on that elusive category power, I nonetheless take up
Judith Butlers question (2002, 214): What is the relation of knowledge to
power such that our epistemological certainties turn out to support a way o
structuring the world that orecloses alternative possibilities o ordering? In
that sense, my practice o critique ollows in the steps o Michel Foucault andJudith Butler, as presented below. But, as we will see below, or both Foucault
-
7/27/2019 Anti-Crisis by Janet Roitman
28/28
100notes to chapter 1
and Butler, as or others, this orm o critique entails or even necessitates
crisis. So while not against this practice o critique, I am noting how it posits
crisis as an a priori. See 34, this book.
16. David Bloors expression is apt or my own project; his concern, however,
is the sociology of knowledge (Bloor 1991, 2001). For debate over his posi-tion, see the exchange between Bloor and Latour: Bloor 1999a, 1999b; Latour
1999a.
17. The very possibility o observation presupposes conditions o observation,
which themselves are not observable. All observations or points o view entail
blind spots, insoar as there can never be an observation, cognition, or knowl-
edge o a totality. In that sense, all observations, cognitions, or points o view
have blind spots, which, when made visible rom another perspective, are re-
produced ad innitum.
18. In his reective essay on Husserls Crisis of the European Sciences ([1954] 1970),James Dodd (2004, 19) notes similar questions, though with the aim, ol-
lowing Husserl, to show that science itsel would not be possible without a
human understanding o the world as a problem, or experienced as ailure.
1. crisis demands
1. I use the plural (histories) to underscore the heterogeneity o any possible
genealogy. With respect to Kosellecks particular historiography, see Davis
2008 and note 28 in this chapter. Many thanks to Gil Anidjar or reerringme to her work.
2. See the eight-volume work edited by Brunner, Conze, and Koselleck (1972
97). Kosellecks extensive writing on this subject and on the ultimate question
o the emergence oNeuzeit(the modern age, modernity) as a historical con-
cept has been commented on at length. I will not reappraise his body o work
or contribute to the secondary literature. For brie reviews, c. Tribe 1989
and Richter 1990. The main body o Kosellecks work in English includes
Koselleck 1988 [original German 1959], 2002, 2004 [original German 1979].
While beyond the scope o this essay, one might note the inuence o Hegel,Husserl, Gadamer, Schmitt, and Heidegger on Koselleck with respect to his
hermeneutic approach and the presence o the uture, all o which can be
explored in, or example, Tribe 1989; Homeyer 1994; Palonen 1999; Palti
2010. See also Blumenberg 1997 and 2010.
3. This is a simplied presentation o Kosellecks portrayal o the mutually con-
stituted possibilities o past, present, and uture; and the extent to which the
lived present is necessarily a ormer uture, all o which indicates the inu-
ence o Heidegger on Kosellecks thinking, especially as presented in the pub-
lication Futures Past. See Carr 1987.4. Koselleck goes so ar as to assert that crisis is necessary or the art o progno-