April 2016Trip to Washington DC
ACC Web Site: arnoldcommunitycouncil.com
2016 Arnold Community Council (ACC) Background Paper for
The Congressional Range and Test Center Caucus (CRTCC)
Executive Summary
The ACC is pleased to have the opportunity to support the CRTCC with information that will strengthen the Nation’s defense. The ACC is most thankful for the CRTCC’s continuing support of all the Major Range and Test Facility Base (MRTFB) which contribute so critically to the development, improvement and sustainment of U.S. military weapon systems, commercial aerospace programs and American technological superiority.
The ACC asks the CRTCC to continue to expand its membership to gain additional support for MRTFB missions in anticipation of the next round of Base Realignments and Closures. The ACC requests specific support for three initiatives that will improve the Nation’s aerospace technical superiority, extend the life and efficiency of the MRTFBs and reduce the overhead associated with operating MRTFBs. We ask the CRTCC and other Congressional Representatives to: 1) Support DoD Test Management Resource Center (TRMC) initiatives to expand the Revitalizing Laboratory Facilities program (RLF) to include MRTFBs and increase the threshold for its use; 2) Support the current funding levels and budgets for the Research, Development, Test and Evaluation (RDT&E) programs, facility construction/modernization and education/training identified in this year’s NDAA and the Five Year Defense Plan; and, 3) Support Air Force initiatives to consolidate and reduce overhead associated with operating MRTFB hypersonic and related facilities.
The ACC continues its tradition of not asking for any additional funding, budget accelerations or legislative ear marks, but is providing information which the Congress can use to better support its constituents. More specifics may be found in the following white paper, attachments and links.
ACC Web Site: arnoldcommunitycouncil.com
White PaperOn
ACC’s Request for Congressional Support of DoD Initiatives
Supporting DoD Efforts to Expand the Revitalizing Laboratory Facilities (RLF) ProgramCurrently, RLF allows the Services to spend up to $5M on construction to extend the life of laboratory facilities or improve such facilities using appropriated funds in accordance with NDAA 2009 Section 219 provisions. These provisions were established to allow needed refurbishment of Service laboratory facilities that could not be accomplished using the Military Construction Program. DoD’s Test Resource Management Center (TRMC) is seeking to expand the program to include MRTFBs and raise the construction limit to $10M. Implementation of such an initiative would increase MRTFB Commanders’ flexibility to quickly repair/replace deteriorating capability needed for critical weapon system testing without requiring any additional funding.
Continuing Support for Current RDT&E and Hypersonic Program Funding Levels. Congress, in its National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013, noted that the state of the Nation’s hypersonic ground test and evaluation facilities and workforce had not received adequate attention over the years. They faced both threats of divesture as well as gradual decay. The 2013 NDAA required the Executive branch to undertake a study identifying how to rectify the U.S. technical shortfall in hypersonic development facilities, related workforce and weapon system programs. Eighteen months later the study called for significant investment in each area and the President’s USAF budgets reflected substantial increases in improvement and modernization monies for MRTFBs. This investment reflects a clearer understanding of reducing the cost of fielding breakthrough technologies. The cost of correcting an error found in operational field testing of a new weapon system is an order of magnitude higher than correcting that same error found during initial operational testing; which is an order of magnitude higher than correcting that same error found during prototype testing; which is an order of magnitude higher than correcting that same error found during ground testing; which is an order of magnitude higher than and correcting that same error found during design reviews. That is a cumulative 1000-fold cost savings through the earliest error correction. Currently the hypersonic laboratory and ground test infrastructure is incapable of providing comprehensive design experiments, prototype simulations or model measurements to find the nuances of hypersonic research and development to advance the state of the art and decrease the risks and costs associated with hypersonic system fielding. The proposed budgets in the FYDP invest in hypersonic work force development, facilities and instrumentation needed to more fully understand the unknown aspects of hypersonic physics and aerothermal-chemistry which have not previously been encountered in advancing aerospace vehicles to hypersonic speeds.
Specific members of the Arnold Community Council are using their influence, talent and resources to directly support the advancement of hypersonic sciences. The University of Tennessee Space Institute (UTSI) is poised to jump start the white and blue collar education and training necessary to ensure holistic hypersonic system development (See Attachment 1). Synergistic with this education initiative is the opportunity to improve the productivity of test and evaluation through the establishment of a Center for Test Sciences also formulated by UTSI (See Attachment 2). AEDC is assisting in this effort through the Digital Thread initiative which allows the integration and advancement of digital test (see http://www.nist.gov/el/msid/upload/1Kraft_DigitalThread.pdf). Finally, UTSI proposes to work with the University of Dayton on a Reusable Hypersonic Vehicle Structures Project – the ACC supports this particular project using unallocated funds within current budgets.
Support for USAF Ground Test Facility Productivity Improvement. The Air Force is reorganizing ground test facility management to improve hypersonic ground test facility synergies. This small reorganization will make Air Force test complex administration similar to that used in the Army and Navy. Each Air Force test complex will have an approximately level distribution of responsibilities at a wing level. Such an organization will enhance equitable financial and agency support across and among complexes.
ACC Web Site: arnoldcommunitycouncil.com
Maintaining Military Superiority: Development of the Hypersonic Testing Workforce
Hypersonic capabilities that operate at speeds greater than Mach 5 (five times the
speed of sound, Mach 1 ~760 mph at sea level) are prioritized in national policy.
Congress, in its National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013, noted that the state of the Nation’s hypersonic ground test and evaluation facilities and workforce have not received adequate attention over the years facing both threats of divesture as well as gradual decay
Congress must recognize the vital need to develop the current workforce supporting the Test & Evaluation of Hypersonic Systems and Technology and encourage the DoD to prioritize workforce development.
Successful current pilot programs supported by the DoD T&E Enterprise which emphasize students must be expanded to include the current T&E workforce – craft, engineering staff, and subject matter experts
A national effort to develop the current workforce across the entire DoD Hypersonics T&E Enterprise will require a geographically diverse effort with significant presence in the major T&E sites
Reflecting the cooperative nature of system RDT&E, partnerships with industry to promote development of the entire national hypersonic workforce must be strongly encouraged
AEDC’s Tennessee and Maryland sites are strongly supported in both research and workforce development by The University of Tennessee Space Institute (UTSI) and the University of Maryland
Arnold Community Council 2016 Critical Issue
NDAA 2013 “hypersonic workforce
needs attention”
AF FY15 S&T Priorities “Hypersonics is a Game
Changer” OMB-OSTP FY16
R&D Priority
The Historic Trend of Boom-Bust Cycles in Hypersonics has Inhibited Sustainment of the Hypersonic Workforce
Historically, workforce development has been supported through R&D efforts that train students who might join the T&E workforce. Resources for development of the current workforce have been sparse.
Hypersonics R&D is a Modernization Priority
ACC Web Site: www.arnoldcommunitycouncil.com
Student development is vital to a healthy future workforce, but they may pursue other career options
ACC Web Site: arnoldcommunitycouncil.com
Attachment 1
The Ce
nter fo
r Test Scien
ces
Tran
sforming Hy
person
ic RDT
&E
Center Overview
February 201
6
J. Schm
isseu
rUniversity
of Ten
nessee
Space Institu
u
ACC W
eb S
ite:
ar
nol
dco
mm
unityc
ounci
l.co
m
Att
achm
ent 2
Center fo
r Test Sciences
Tran
sforming Hy
person
ic RDT
&E
Hig
h-S
peed
Cap
abilit
ies
= M
ilita
ry O
ppor
tuni
ty
Strategic Priorities R
equire
Efficient Area Co
verage
“Pivot to
the Pa
cific”
High‐Speed Ca
pabilities Are
Potential G
ame‐Ch
angers in
respon
se to
an An
ti‐Ac
cess/Area Den
ial threat
15 m
in at
500 nm
/hr
15 m
in at
Mach 6
~50X
area
23 m
in at
Mach 6
15 m
in at
Mach 9
~120
X area
•Survivable
•Respo
nsive
•Ope
ratio
nally Efficient –
greatly
increased area
coverage per asset
For T
ime Critical Targets: AMach 6
System
Covers a
n Area
Equ
ivalen
t to 50
Co
nven
tional Systems
•Significant re
duction in infrastructure,
supp
ort, risk
ACC W
eb S
ite:
ar
nol
dco
mm
unityc
ounci
l.co
m
Center fo
r Test Sciences
Tran
sforming Hy
person
ic RDT
&E
Curren
t Status –
Hyperson
icsD
eman
ds
Accelerated Tech Transition
Dual‐Fue
l Veh
icle Con
cept,
Courtesy Boe
ing
Hype
rson
ic Systems:
•Highly Integrated
•Highly Uncertain
•De
mand
Foun
datio
nal
Know
ledge
Challenges
•Extrem
e environm
ent req
uires scien
ce and
techno
logy inno
vatio
n and breakthrou
ghs
•De
signs and
con
cepts are still evolving –narrow
gap from
disc
overy to im
plem
entatio
n
•Historic boo
m‐bust cycle has had
broad
impact
•Und
ereq
uipp
ed workforce
•Disjointed
techno
logy fu
nding path
•De
signing
the system
s of the
future… with
the tool se
ts of the
past!
Opp
ortunity
•Hy
person
icsis p
rioritize
d in m
ultip
le national
policy do
cumen
ts
•Increasin
g natio
nal recognitio
n of th
e ne
ed to
address the
challenges abo
ve
ACC W
eb S
ite:
ar
nol
dco
mm
unityc
ounci
l.co
m
Center fo
r Test Sciences
Tran
sforming Hy
person
ic RDT
&E
Four Dom
ains W
here Inno
vatio
n is Re
quire
dAc
celerated Techno
logy Transition
Workforce Develop
men
t
Restricted Ac
cess (D
riven
) Research
Metho
dology Develop
men
t
Targeted
research sp
ecifically cho
sen to add
ress
critical challenges identified by program
s
3‐5 Generation
Advancem
ent, 30
+ Tech Transition
s beyond
HTV
‐2
Education of th
e currenth
ypersonics
workforce
as well as p
otentia
l future workforce
•Gradu
ate de
grees
•Specialty
certificates
•Short C
ourses
•Online Seminars
~50%
of the
ME/AE
stud
ents
at UTSI are AED
C Em
ployees
Ex: AF
OSR
‐fun
ded STAR
team
develop
ed STABL cod
e to
improve aerothermod
ynam
ic heatin
g analysis utilized in
DARPA HT
V‐2 program
New
tools a
nd m
etho
ds critical to
the
advancem
ent o
f hypersonic capabilities
Ex: CT
S mem
bers are amon
g the
leading National Experts in
Low
Disturbance
“Quiet” Tunn
els
Research driv
en by ne
eds from sp
ecific
programs w
ith sp
ecific access
requ
irements.
•ITAR
and
classified
•Re
search can
be un
classified/ITAR
, bu
t dire
cted
by spon
sors to
add
ress
challenges from
restricted
programs
This Capability is Und
er Develop
ment
ACC W
eb S
ite:
ar
nol
dco
mm
unityc
ounci
l.co
m
Center fo
r Test Sciences
Tran
sforming Hy
person
ic RDT
&E
CTS Mem
ber Institutions
•Expe
rtise
•Re
levance
•Proxim
ity
Phase 1 –Expe
rtise
in
Laminar‐Turbu
lent
Transition
Expe
rimen
ts,
Quiet Tun
nels
Simulations
Phase 2 –Expe
rtise
in
Shock Interactions,
Expe
rimen
tal M
etho
ds
Governm
ent &
Indu
stry Partners
Air F
orce Research Labo
ratory
Arno
ld Engineerin
g De
velopm
ent C
omplex
NAS
A –Marshall, Langley, Ames
Army Av
iatio
n and MissleR&
D Ce
nter
Oak Ridge National Laboratories
Sand
ia National Laboratories ACC W
eb S
ite:
ar
nol
dco
mm
unityc
ounci
l.co
m
Center fo
r Test Sciences
Tran
sforming Hy
person
ic RDT
&E
Indu
stry/G
ov’t
Consortiu
m
One
Center –
Multip
le M
issions
Efficient Operatio
nsvia a
single orga
nizatio
nal
structure
Metho
dology Develop
men
tWorkforce Develop
men
tAccel. Tech Transition
Restricted Access Effo
rts
Advancem
ents in one
mission benefit others
New
Capability
Traine
d Cu
rrent W
orkforce
“Real‐T
ime” Te
ch Insertion
Redu
ced Tech Risk
Exam
ple from
Prio
r Work
Improved
Stability An
alysis
Existing Workforce Trained
&
Grad Stud
ents Hire
d
HTV
-2
X-5
1
Utilize
d as “prob
lem so
lver” by
Demo Programs
STAB
L‐3D
Evolved and Ap
plied as ITAR
‐restricted tool fo
r T&E Enterprise
CTS Po
rtfolio
Com
prise
d of M
ultip
le Fun
ded Efforts –
mappe
d against m
ission areas
Advancem
ent o
f Quiet Tun
nels
Restricted Access
Programs
Developm
ent o
f National T&E
Workforce Initiative
Arno
ld Diagnostics
Summit
ACC W
eb S
ite:
ar
nol
dco
mm
unityc
ounci
l.co
m
Center fo
r Test Sciences
Tran
sforming Hy
person
ic RDT
&E
Developm
ent O
pportunitie
s for th
e Cu
rrent &
FutureT&
E Workforce
Craft Force
Engine
ering Staff
Subject M
atter E
xperts
Future Employees
Specialized
Training in New
Metho
ds and
Techn
iques
Gradu
ate Education in Disc
iplines Critical to
Hy
person
ic Systems
Short C
ourses
Certificate Program
s
Internships
and On‐Site
Experie
nce
Opp
ortunitie
s to Learn from
Recognized International Experts
–Enabled by On‐Site and
Web
‐Based
Interactions
ACC W
eb S
ite:
ar
nol
dco
mm
unityc
ounci
l.co
m
Center fo
r Test Sciences
Tran
sforming Hy
person
ic RDT
&E
Steerin
g Co
mmittee
/ Spon
sors:
“Vote with
Their Wallets”
Technical Challenges & Prio
rities
•Specific Efforts w
ithin
Thrusts P
erform
ed by sub‐
grou
ps of C
TS M
embers
•Ap
proved/prio
ritize
d by
Steerin
g Co
mmittee
Advanced
Simulations
Laminar‐Turbu
lent
Transition
Turbine
Engine
s?Shock
Interactions
Organiza
tional Structure
–Indu
stry/G
overnm
ent
Consortiu
m
Diagno
stics &
Instrumen
tatio
n
Phase I
Phase II
Future Phases
CTS Mem
bers Propo
se
Research‐Driv
en Solutions
Major Research Thrusts
ACC W
eb S
ite:
ar
nol
dco
mm
unityc
ounci
l.co
m
Center fo
r Test Sciences
Tran
sforming Hy
person
ic RDT
&E
Engagemen
tInitial Stages o
f Partnership/
Advocacy Develop
ment
Indu
stry
•Raythe
on and
Boe
ing are
supp
ortive
•Lockhe
ed and
Northrop
Grumman
wou
ld like to
kno
w
more
Governm
ent
•TR
MC initially engaged
•DA
RPA, ASD
RE and
AFRL –
discussin
g dates for brie
fings
•NAS
A, Navy, Arm
y ‐T
BDRaythe
on has se
nt letters o
f advocacy to th
e VP
‐Research at UT, Purdu
e, ND, and
Arizon
a
Ray
theo
n en
dors
es th
e ef
forts
of D
r. Sc
hmis
seur
to d
evel
op
and
lead
the
mul
ti-un
iver
sity
, Cen
ter f
or T
est S
cien
ces,
…
and
will
giv
e se
rious
con
side
ratio
ns to
bei
ng a
n in
dust
rial
mem
ber i
n th
e fu
ture
col
labo
rativ
e ce
nter
.
ACC W
eb S
ite:
ar
nol
dco
mm
unityc
ounci
l.co
m
Center fo
r Test Sciences
Tran
sforming Hy
person
ic RDT
&E
Exa
mpl
e C
TS In
itiat
ive:
Adv
ance
d D
iagn
ostic
s &
In
stru
men
tatio
nD
evel
opm
ent
Arno
ld Diagnostics S
ummit
Summer Program
•2 Weeks of C
ollabo
ratio
n at UTSI
durin
g Summer
•“W
orksho
p” enviro
nmen
t includ
ing academ
ic, governm
ent,
and contractor re
searchers
•Cu
lminates with
Dem
o of
Potential Solutions in
AED
C facilities
Accelerated Techno
logy Transition
, an
d Workforce Develop
ment for
the T&
E Enterprise
•“G
rand
Challenge” m
easuremen
t each year
•3‐5 participating institu
tions/year g
eared up
for challenge
•AF
OSR/SBIR/STTR
/HSST/AE
DC sp
onsored
•An
nual program
review
= dem
o of possib
le
Grand
Challenge solutio
ns•AE
DC Ju
nior Force m
embe
r paired with
each
participating institu
tion
•Facilitate tech transition –tech and
hum
an
Concep
t of O
peratio
nsAn
nual Program
Review
Potential Participants: CT
S Mem
bers and
Other Institu
tions
Lead
Institu
tion
Gov’t team
s cou
ld participate, to
o
Leverage Sum
mer Faculty Fellows P
rogram
ACC W
eb S
ite:
ar
nol
dco
mm
unityc
ounci
l.co
m
Center fo
r Test Sciences
Tran
sforming Hy
person
ic RDT
&E
Exam
ples of C
TS M
embe
rs Prio
r Con
tributions
•Critical expertise in hypersonic laminar
turbulen
t transition
provide
d to HTV
‐2 and
X‐51
program
s
•Tech Transition
of research tools to
application at AED
C Tunn
el 9
•Partne
rship with
AFRL on
Flight Test o
f Laminar Flow Con
trol Devices
•Cu
rren
t ope
rators of all hype
rson
ic quiet
tunn
els in th
e US
•Creatio
n and Initiation of AFRL‐Au
stralian
DSTO
HIFiREProgram
•CT
S mem
bers’ stude
nts are actively sought
•AF
RL, N
ASA, Sandia, and
Indu
stry
This
is n
ot th
e sa
me
Tunn
el 9
from
10
yea
rs a
go -Dan
Mar
ren
Dire
ctor
, AE
DC
T9
HTV
-2X-
51
ACC W
eb S
ite:
ar
nol
dco
mm
unityc
ounci
l.co
m
Center fo
r Test Sciences
Tran
sforming Hy
person
ic RDT
&E
Mach
Scale (in
ches)
4812
UT TA
Lon
M6 36
dia
(201
8)
M5 36
dia
Quiet
(202
0)AE
DC VKF
A40x40
Mach 1.5‐5
UT TA
Lon
M4
24x24
AEDC
Tun
nel 9
60 inch dia.
Mach 7,8,10
,14
AEDC
VKF
B
50 in
dia
Mach 6,8
USA
FA M
6 Ludw
iegTube
20 in
dia.
Purdue
M6
Ludw
ieg
Tube
9 in. dia
Texas A
&M
M6 Quiet
Tunn
el 7.5
in. dia.
Florida State
Mach 5 12
x12
U. Texas
Mach 5 6x7
CTS Mem
ber &
Notable Facilitie
s
Basic
Research
Test & Evaluation
TALon& ND
Tunn
els B
ridge
the Gap
TALonbridges gap from
basic
science to T&E
•Inten
ded to driv
e inno
vatio
n / tech
transfer
UT, Notre Dam
e, and
Pu
rdue
are collabo
ratin
g on
Quiet Tun
nel
Developm
ent (also with
Texas A&
M and
NAS
A Langley)
HSWT 8x8
M 2.0 (2
016)
M 1.8
M 3.0
(201
6)M 2.3
UTSI Current Facilitie
s
(2016)
ND M6 Quiet
Ludw
iegTube
24 in
dia. (20
18)
ND High
Enthalpy
Tun
nels
Texas A
&M
ACE M 5‐8
Key
Quiet Facilitie
sHigh
Enthalpy
Friend
s of C
TS
ACC W
eb S
ite:
ar
nol
dco
mm
unityc
ounci
l.co
m
AEDC’s economic impact $609 million in 2015
AEDC Arnold Engineering Development ComplexArnold Air Force Base, Tenn. 37389An Air Force Test Center Test Facility
Test Before Flight www.arnold.af.mil
Arnold Engineering Development Complex’s (AEDC) economic impact – which includes AEDC and its remote operating locations the Hypervelocity Tunnel 9 at White Oak in Silver Spring, Md., and the National Full-Scale Aerodynamics Complex at Moffett Field, Calif. – was $609.3 million in Fiscal Year 2015.
Each location impacted the local areas through payroll, secondary jobs, created through local spending, and other expenditures for supplies, utilities, fuel and services and the spin-off impact of those purchases.
AEDC employed a combination of active-duty military personnel from the Air Force and Navy; Department of Defense civilians; and contractor personnel, which totaled 2,266 personnel in fiscal 2015. Of the 2,266 personnel, 53 were active-duty military; one Air Force Reserve and National Guard; 324 appropriated fund civilian employees (includes general schedule, federal wage board and other military branches); 53 government non-appropriated fund employees; 36 other civilians (credit
union, Base Exchange and commissary tenants); and 1,799 contractor and sub-contractor employees.
Additionally, using the Tennessee Valley Authority economic impact model methodology, AEDC estimated that more than 1,608 secondary jobs were created in the local area, for a total of 3,874 jobs directly related to AEDC. Examples of secondary jobs include those created by home construction and at local supermarkets, car dealerships and department stores.
During fiscal 2015, the payroll cost for AEDC government and contractor personnel was $244.2 million. AEDC’s direct expenditures – which include utility costs, service contracts with outside vendors and military health insurance paid to local doctors and hospitals – was $170 million. Furthermore, the indirect spin-off impact of these direct expenditures is approximately $195 million.
The overall economic impact figure does not include more than $100 million paid to the approximately 4,608 retired military personnel living in the local area.
In total, this retired pay group generates more than $154 million, including the spin-off effect.
The economic impact data and secondary employment estimates represent AEDC’s economic impact during fiscal 2015, which runs from Oct. 1, 2014 to Sept. 30, 2015.
AEDC operates the world’s largest complex of ground test facilities with a replacement value of more than $11.6 billion.
Direct Employment at AEDC Military 54 DoD Civilian 324 Non-appropriated Fund 53 ATA 1,799 Other 36
Base Exchange, Commissary, Ascend Federal Credit Union, tenant organizations, other contractors
Total 2,266
Secondary Jobs Created 1,608 Total Employment Impact 3,874
Fiscal Year 2015Work Force Impact Data
TVA Model Estimates for AEDCAs of Sept. 30, 2015
AEDC Public Affairs • 100 Kindel Drive Suite A‒242 • Arnold AFB, TN(931) 454-4204 • DSN 340-4204
For information on AEDC visit our website at www.arnold.af.mil
Release # 2016-063
Total Employment2,266
Total Economic Impact$609.3. M
As of September 30, 2015
Some outside contractors are not in included on this map.
WHERE THE AEDC WORK FORCE LIVES...
TUNNEL 9, White Oak, Maryland - 38
NFAC - 4
Other Out-of-State - 37
ACC Web Site: arnoldcommunitycouncil.com
Bryant Diane Executive Director, Tullahoma Area Chamber of Commerce
ACC Member [email protected] (931) 247-5717
Bymaster Mark Aeropropulsion Product Manager, ATA
ACC Member [email protected] (931) 308-4300
Cordell Gary Coffee County Mayor ACC Member [email protected] (931) 580-4321Craig Ben Realtor/Owner, Craig & Wheeler
RealtyACC Past President
[email protected] (931) 639-0694
Gamble Rick Space & Missile Product Manager, ATA
ACC Member [email protected] (931) 409-4946
Gattis Kathy Public Affairs Manager, ATA ACC Facilitator [email protected] (615) 714-6932Haars Jeff Deputy General Manager, ATA ACC Member [email protected] (850) 496-4180
Herron Jim Business Development ACC President [email protected] (931) 808-2053
Hicks Jim Recording Secretary,AEMTC; AFL-CIO
ACC Member [email protected] (931) 434-3904
Hudson Terri Executive Director,Manchester Area Chamber of Commerce
ACC Member [email protected] (931) 409-9086
Jalbert Paul Flight Systems Test Section Manager, ATA
ACC Member [email protected] (931) 581-6420
Layton Tim Propulsion Test Branch Manager, ATA
ACC Member [email protected] (931) 247-0649
Lee Beverly Colonel, USAFR (Ret) ACC Member [email protected] (949) 701-2932McAmis Dr. Rob Integrated Test &
Evaluation Director, ATAACC Member [email protected] (931) 247-0019
Morse Claude Chairman of the Honor Flight of Middle Tenn
ACC Secretary [email protected] (931) 247-5151
Niederhauser Mike Businessman ACC Chairman, Legislative Affairs
[email protected] (931) 247-8696
Schlagheck Ron Retired NASA, Marshall Space Flight Center
ACC Member [email protected] (256) 683-1844
Sebourn Lynn Chairman, Tullahoma Area Economic Development Corp
ACC Member [email protected] (931) 434-1007
Skelton Brian General Manager, Tullahoma Utilities Board
ACC Vice Presi-dent
[email protected] (931) 581-7278
Stewart Jack NAMI Greene County, President ACC Member [email protected] (423) 329-4355
Teal Stan 2016 President, Manchester Area Chamber of Commerce
ACC Member [email protected] (931) 273-5737
Wiedemer Mike Major General, USAF (Ret) Acting ACC President
[email protected] (931) 308-1923
Wood Walt USAF Chief of Staff Civic Leader ACC Past President
[email protected] (931) 580-9663
Last Name
ACC Legislative Trip Attendees 2016
First Name Job Title ACC Title Email Cell Phone
ACC Web Site: arnoldcommunitycouncil.com