Transcript
Page 1: Are Users the Gold Standard for Accessibility Evaluation?

Are Users the Gold Standard

for Accessibility Evaluation?

7th April - W4A’14

Amaia Aizpurua1, Myriam Arrue Simon Harper2, Markel Vigo3

U. of the Basque Country University of Manchester

http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2596695.2596705

1: @amaiaaizpurua 2: @sharpic3: @markelvigo

Page 2: Are Users the Gold Standard for Accessibility Evaluation?

Motivation

• User testing for accessibility evaluation

• Encouraged by the community

• No established procedures

– What?

– When?

– How?

27th April - W4A’14 Are Users the Gold Standard for Accessibility Evaluation?

Page 3: Are Users the Gold Standard for Accessibility Evaluation?

In practice

• Evaluating web accessibility for blind users

– User testing method• Effectiveness in identifying accessibility problems

[Mankoff et al. 2005]

– Accessibility guidelines• Partial coverage of user problems

[Power et al. 2012]

37th April - W4A’14 Are Users the Gold Standard for Accessibility Evaluation?

Page 4: Are Users the Gold Standard for Accessibility Evaluation?

Study results

• Accessibility: conformance vs. perceived

Website AA conformance level Perceived

47th April - W4A’14 Are Users the Gold Standard for Accessibility Evaluation?

Median Mode SD

6 7 1.95

6 6 1.42

2 1 1.62

6 6 1.95

1: very inaccessible

7: very accessible

Satisfied SC Non-satisfied SC

73% 27%

69% 31%

52% 48%

36% 64%

Page 5: Are Users the Gold Standard for Accessibility Evaluation?

Why this mismatch?

• Guidelines vs. user problems

• Eliciting users’ problems– Experience/report problems differently: web

expertise

– Interaction context, tasks type

• Identifying accessibility issues– Combination of causes, contextual

information

– Under the influence of the evaluator effect57th April - W4A’14 Are Users the Gold Standard for Accessibility Evaluation?

Page 6: Are Users the Gold Standard for Accessibility Evaluation?

Discussion

• Inclusive participatory evaluation

– Following the considerations of co-operative

evaluation

– Evaluator and user evaluating a website

collaboratively

– Instead of interpreting data afterwards, work

on problems during the session

• Improve effectiveness

67th April - W4A’14 Are Users the Gold Standard for Accessibility Evaluation?

Page 7: Are Users the Gold Standard for Accessibility Evaluation?

Conclusions

• User testing may not be the gold standard

for web accessibility evaluation

• Users are a gold mine

• Co-operative accessibility evaluation

• Bridge the gap?

77th April - W4A’14 Are Users the Gold Standard for Accessibility Evaluation?


Top Related