Board-Level Employee Representation [BLER]
IN EUROPE AND DENMARK
Aline ConchonResearcherEuropean Trade Union [email protected]
Konference for medarbejdervalgte bestyrelsesmedlemmer
November 6, 2012
Board-level employee representation in Europe and Denmark2
Structure of the presentation
A. European perspectives on BLER1. Current situation in Europe: overview of national rights
2. Trends in Europe : evolution of national rights
3. Current situation at EU level: BLER in EU company law
4. Trends at EU level: BLER rights under pressure
B. BLER in Denmark: Preliminary findings of a survey1. Who are the respondents?
2. What influence on boardrooms decisions?
3. What interests do BLEReps defend?
alineconchon © etui (2012)
Board-level employee representation
EUROPEAN PERSPECTIVES
alineconchon © etui (2012) Board-level employee representation in Europe and Denmark4
1. Current situation in Europe: overview of national rights
Widespread participation rightscomprising private (and privatised) as well as state-owned companies (14 countries)
Limited participation rightsOnly found in state-owned companies (4 countries)
No (or very limited) participations rights(12 countries)
FR
ESPT
UK
IE
IS
NOSE FI
EE
LT
PL
CZ SK
HU
IT
GR
AT
DEBE
LV
LUFR
ESPT
UK
IE
NO SE
FI
EE
LT
PL
CZSK
HU
IT
MT
GR
AT
DENL
SI
BE
LV
LU
CY
BG
RO
DK
IS
LI
● BLER rights in the European Economic Area
=At least 17,442 BLEReps
and another 5,733 companies with BLEReps (FI, NL, CZ, SK,
DE Drittel)
2. Trends in Europe: evolution of national rights
● The impact of privatisation in countries where BLER is to be found only in state-owned companies BLER disappeared in MT BLER might soon disappeared in GR and ES savings banks Dramatic decrease of the number of SOEs in IE and PL (+ bill in PL to
eliminate BLER, but stalled since March 2011)
● Weakening of BLER rights on the occasion of the introduction of the one-tier system (HU, SI), and even elimination (CZ), though not in DK nor NL
● Initiatives from political actors In FR, by the end of 2012, a bill for employee reps on remuneration
committee and a national debate to extend BLER in the entire private sector In IT: a government decree by spring 2013 for facultative BLER in companies
with a two-tier board and >300 employees● Some trade unions’ demands for extending the coverage of BLER rights
(in NO, DE, LU, FR, NL, IE), and creating some kind of BLER (UK)
CHALLENGES
OPPORTUNITIES
Board-level employee representation in Europe and Denmark6
3. Current situation at EU level: BLER in EU company law
alineconchon © etui (2012)
● BLER is a European fundamental right!
● BLER is anchored in 3 pieces of European Company law:
The 2001 European Company statute (SE – Societas Europaea) The 2003 European Cooperative Society statute (SCE – Societas
Cooperativa Europaea) The 2005 Cross-border Merger [CBM] Directive
Information, consultation and participation of workers must be developed along appropriate lines
‘The Union shall support and complement the activities of the Member States in the following fields: […] - Representation and collective defence of the interests of workers and employers, including codetermination’1989 Community Charter for
fundamental social rights for workers Art. 153 (f) Treaty on the functioning of the EU
No harmonisation but flexibility based on two key principles: Negotiation on BLER arrangements ‘before and after’ principle for safeguarding pre-existing BLER rights
Board-level employee representation in Europe and Denmark7
4. Trends at EU level: BLER rights under pressure
● Companies can restrict or even circumvent national BLER rights because of:
alineconchon © etui (2012)
Loopholes in the current EU legislation
The Cross-Border Merger Directive is less protective than the SE Directive (e.g. merged companies with a one-tier structure could restrict BLER to 1/3 of the board)
In theory (but rare in practice), the SE statute could be used to avoid or “freeze” BLER, as negotiations on employee involvement take place before the setting up of the SE, and there is a legal uncertainty as to the possibility of reopening negotiation (even in the case of a significant increase of the workforce)
The emergence of a European “Delaware effect”
It is legal for companies to shop amongst the different national regulatory regimes and opt for the one with the least stringent rules (esp. on BLER)
Rulings of the European Court of Justice indeed allow companies to register in one Member States (and be subject to its company law) while having all its business activities in another Member States (without applying its legal provision on BLER). => 43 large German companies do not have BLER as they registered abroad (e.g. as British Plc.)
Board-level employee representation in Europe and Denmark8
4. Trends at EU level: BLER rights under pressure
● Counter-actions and proposals from The European Parliament: multiple calls for a 14th Directive on cross-
border transfer of seat The ETUC: demand for European minimum standards for employee
involvement in Europe
alineconchon © etui (2012)
All the legal forms of company entity at the EU level SE, SCE and pending SPE) must be subject to binding regulations on worker participation in company boards and on information and consultation with worker representatives regarding cross-border issues.
Companies that have operations in several countries should be covered by the regulations that entail the best available model for worker participation.
● Paradox of a worker right not attached to workers but to companies as the applicable legal framework: Is not that of the country where workers habitually carry out their work But that of the country where the company is registered
BLER in Denmark
PRELIMINARY FINDINGS OF A SURVEY
10
Who are the respondents?
alineconchon © etui (2012) Board-level employee representation in Europe and Denmark
Gender
13% 87%
Characteristics of individuals
Characteristics of the companies in which they sit
Age
Min. 30Max. 66Average: 51 ½
Education Position
1 VOCATIONAL TRAINING (50%)
2 Elementary education (31%)
1 BLUE COLLAR (47%)
2 Technician (24%)
3 Professional (23%)
4 White collar (5,5%)
5 Manager (0,5%)
1%
10%
47%
38%
4%
Medium50-249
Large250-4 999
Small 10-49
Micro 1-9
Extra large >5 000
Size23.7%
73%
3.3%
Non-listed
Don’t know Listed
Listed on the stock exchange
Board-level employee representation in Europe and Denmark11
What influence on boardrooms decisions?
alineconchon © etui (2012)
Explanation: the running of the board!
The majority (53,6%) considers that the main decisions are made outside the board meetings, without employee representatives.
The Influence/Power Continuum (inspired by Heller 1971)
Information Consultation
Influence
30%22%
52%
Joint-decision Control/Co-Management
Power
29%19%
48%
Board-level employee representation in Europe and Denmark12
What interests do BLEReps defend?
INTERESTS %
Employees 81,8
The company 61,4
Shareholders 24,2
Trade unions 14,1
Local labour market 5,6
Wider society 4,2
Environment 2,8
Other 1,4
alineconchon © etui (2012)
Note: total >100% as figures present the sum of the items placed in ranking position #1 and #2
INTERESTS %
Employees 78,5
LT economic return 77,5
Environment 71
Shareholders 56,5
Local community 45,5
Trade unions 37,5
ETUI survey (2009) Rose/Kvist (2003)
Ranking
1
2
3
4
5
6
With the exception of “Environment”findings are similar
BLEReps defend a stakeholder approach, but not to the detriment of the company (ranked #2) nor of the shareholders (ranked #3 &4)!
alineconchon © etui (2012) Board-level employee representation in Europe and Denmark13
Thank you for your attention!
More information to be found at: