Download - Bosnia and Herzegovina and the Eu
1
B U C E R I U S L A W S C H O O L
PRESENTATION
'' BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA AND THE EUROPEAN UNION ''
HAMBURG 19.10.2012.
2
Glossary
3) INTRODUCTION
4) LEGAL BASIS FOR THE ACCESSION TO THE EUROPEAN UNION
(EU ENLAGREMENT)
6) HISTORY OF THE ACCESSION OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA IN THE EU
7) STATUS OF SAA RATIFICATION
10) PRESENT SITUATION IN THE ACCESSION PROCESS
12) MEMEBRSHIP CRITERIAS FOR BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA
13) EU PROGRAMS AND BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA
3
INTRODUCTION
This presentation deal with the topic of the enlargement of the European Union and the
European integration of Bosnia and Herzegovina. It’s also related to research the status of Bosnia
and Herzegovina in this process.
Bosnia and Herzegovina is a country in the heart of south east Europe and it’s a potential
candidate for membership in the European Union. The last years there have been some progress
but not enough to reach all the criteria’s that are important to become a part of the family of the
European Union.
With this presentation we want to research the reasons why Bosnia and Herzegovina is still one
of the last countries in the European integration, in south east Europe. This presentation will
show the legal aspects of the EU accession of Bosnia and Herzegovina but also the political
issues that are stopping Bosnia and Herzegovina in their way into the European Union.
We hope that this presentation will show you some aspects of this bilateral/multilateral
relationship between Bosnia and Herzegovina, the European Union and the member countries.
4
LEGAL BASIS FOR THE ACCESSION TO THE EUROPEAN UNION
(EU ENLAGREMENT)
oining the European union is a long distance process that need to be defined by the European
institutions and the members so that this way can be open for all European countries.
The Enlargement of the European Union is the process of expanding the European Union
(EU) through the accession of new member states. This process began with the Inner Six, who
founded the European Coal and Steel Community (the EU's predecessor) in 1952. Since then, the
EU's membership has grown to twenty-seven with the most recent expansion to Bulgaria and
Romania in 2007. A scheduled expansion in 2013 will add Croatia to the union.
Currently, accession negotiations are under way with several states. The process of enlargement is
sometimes referred to as European integration. This term is also used to refer to the
intensification of co-operation between EU member states as national governments allow for the
gradual harmonization of national laws.
The legal base for European countries1 is the Article 49 of the Treaty on the EU says:
Any European State which respects the values referred to in Article 2 and is committed to promoting
They may apply to become a member of the Union. The European Parliament and national
Parliaments shall be notified of this application. The Applicant State shall address its application to
the Council, which shall act unanimously after consulting the Commission and after receiving the
consent of the European Parliament, which shall act by a majority of its component members. The
conditions of eligibility agreed upon by the European Council shall be taken into account.
The conditions of admission and the adjustments to the Treaties on which the Union is founded,
which such admission entails, shall be the subject of an agreement between the Member States and
the applicant State. This agreement shall be submitted for ratification by all the contracting States in
accordance with their respective constitutional requirements.
This Article forward also to the Article 2 of the Treaty on the EU which says:
The Union is founded on the values of respect for human dignity, freedom, democracy, equality, the
rule of law and respect for human rights, including the rights of persons belonging to minorities.
1 What can be considered as a European country is still not clear defined, mostly countries that are members of
the Council of Europe are considered as European countries, but also there is a exclusion that Russia and countries from the Caucasus are potential members. – Page 14 - Recht auf Beitritt – Juli Zeh – NOMOS 2002
J
5
These values are common to the Member States in a society in which pluralism, non-discrimination,
tolerance, justice, solidarity and equality between women and men prevail.
Through this is clear the basis for the accession to the EU is the Treaty on the EU and that is a
legal possibility open for subjects of international law, concrete countries to step into the process
of joining the European Union.
Analyzing this articles which are the base for the integration of countries which are not part of
the EU, we can also conclude that the main goal of the EU is the Article 2 and the values which
are defined. We also can connect this article with the values which are defined in the Convention
of Human rights of the Council of Europe and the statute of the Council of Europe. The
membership in the Council of Europe can be considered as the first step into the integration of
the European Union, even that the Council of Europe has no legal connections with the
European Union.
The Copenhagen criteria are clear defining whether a country is eligible to join the EU or not.
The criteria require that a state has the institutions to preserve democratic governance and human
rights, has a functioning market economy, and accepts the obligations and intent of the EU. 2
These membership criteria were laid down at the June 1993 European Council in Copenhagen,
Denmark, from which they take their name. Excerpt from the Copenhagen Presidency
conclusions:
Membership requires that candidate country has achieved stability of institutions guaranteeing
democracy, the rule of law, human rights, respect for and protection of minorities, the existence
of a functioning market economy as well as the capacity to cope with competitive pressure and
market forces within the Union. Membership presupposes the candidate's ability to take on the
obligations of membership including adherence to the aims of political, economic and monetary
union.
Most of these elements have been clarified over the last decade by legislation of the European
Council, the European Commission and the European Parliament, as well as by the case law of
the European Court of Justice and the European Court of Human Rights.
For now, the EU has 27 members which are full members and one state (Croatia) is becoming
member in 2013. There are 4 candidate states (Serbia, Montenegro, Macedonia and Turkey), and
one that submitted the application for candidate status. Bosnia and Herzegovina together with
the particular recognized Republic of Kosovo is the only country that is a potential candidate.
2 Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copenhagen_criteria
6
HISTORY OF THE ACCESSION OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA TO THE EU
Bosnia and Herzegovina is still a potential candidate state, even there have been seen progress in
sphere of establishing a free economy and issues that are connected with the economic and
legislative part of the conditions. But there is still work to do, especially regarding the protection
of Human Rights and political rights of minorities. These questions are political questions that
need to be solved so that Bosnia and Herzegovina can approach to apply for candidate status.
The accession of Bosnia and Herzegovina to the European Union is the aim of the present
relations between the two entities. Bosnia and Herzegovina has been recognized by the EU as a
"potential candidate country" for accession since the decision of the European Council in
Thessaloniki in 2003. Bosnia and Herzegovina takes part in the Stabilization and Association
Process, and the relative bilateral SAA agreement has been signed in 2008, ratified in 2010, but it
is still not into force. Meanwhile, the trade bilateral relations are regulated by an Interim
Agreement. Bosnia has not yet formally applied for EU membership, and it thus remains a
potential candidate country.
The nation has recently been making slow but steady progress, including co-operation with the
war crimes tribunal at The Hague. The EU established a regional approach to the Western
Balkans already in 1997, with political and economic conditionality criteria for the development
of bilateral relations. The following year, an EU/Bosnia and Herzegovina Consultative Task
Force was put in place to start the process. Since 2006, the task force is replaced by the Reform
Process Monitoring (RPM).
Stabilization and Association Agreement
The negotiations on a Stabilization and Association Agreement (SAA) – the first step before
applying for membership – started in 2005 and were originally expected to be finalized in late
2007. The negotiations stalled due to a disagreement over police reform, which the EU insisted
on centralizing away from the entities of Bosnia and Herzegovina. The SAA was initialed on 4
December 2007, and, following the adoption of the police reforms in April 2008, the SAA was
signed on 16 June 2008. Reforms promised by the Prud Agreement would ―build the ability of
the State to meet the requirements of the EU integration process‖.
The last ratification of the SAA by an EU country, France, came in February 2011. The SAA
should have gone into effect within 40 days, but its entry into effect was frozen since Bosnia and
Herzegovina was still not complying with its previous obligations, a situation that would have led
to the immediate suspension of the SAA. The obligations to be met by Bosnia before the SAA
could come into effect include the adoption of state laws on state aids and on the national
census, and the implementation of the Finci and Sejdic ruling of the ECHR requiring an
amendment to the Constitution to allow members of national minorities to be elected within the
Presidency of Bosnia and Herzegovina and to gain seats in the House of Peoples. The adoption
of state laws on the issues above is prevented by the opposition of the government of the
Republika Srpska, which considers such issues a matter of exclusive competence of the two
entities of Bosnia and Herzegovina.
7
Status of SAA ratification
Event
Republic of
Macedonia [
7]
Croatia [8
]
Albania [
9]
Montenegro1 [1
0]
Bosnia and
Herzegovina [1
1]
Serbia2 [1
2]
Kosovo
(under
UNSC
R
1244)3
SAA
negotiation
s start
2000-04-05 2000-11-
24
2003-01-
31 2005-10-10 2005-11-25
2005-10-
10 (?)
SAA
initialled 2000-11-24
2001-05-
14
2006-02-
28 2007-03-15 2007-12-04
2007-11-
07 (?)
SAA/IA
signature 2001-04-09
2001-10-
29
2006-06-
12 2007-10-15 2008-06-16
2008-04-
29 (?)
Interim Agreement:
EC
ratification 2001-04-27
2002-01-
30
2006-06-
12 2007-10-15 2008-06-16
2009-12-
08 (?)
SAP state
ratification 2001-04-27
2002-01-
30
2006-10-
09 2007-11-14 2008-06-20
2008-09-
22 (?)
entry into
force 2001-06-01
2002-03-
01
2006-12-
01 2008-01-01 2008-07-01
2010-02-
01 (?)
Notification of the EC of SAA ratification by:
SAP state 2001-04-27 2002-01-
30
2006-11-
09 2007-11-13 2009-02-26
2008-09-
22 (?)
Austria 2002-09-06 2002-03-
15
2008-05-
21 2008-07-04 2009-09-04
2011-01-
13 (?)
Belgium 2003-12-29 2003-12-
17
2008-10-
22 2010-03-29 2010-03-29
2012-03-
20 (?)
Bulgaria entered the EU later 2008-05-30 2009-03-13 2010-08-
12 (?)
Cyprus entered the EU later 2008-05-
30 2008-11-20 2009-07-02
2010-11-
26 (?)
8
Czech
Republic
entered the EU later 2008-05-
07 2009-02-19 2009-07-23
2011-01-
28 (?)
Denmark 2002-04-10 2002-05-
08
2008-04-
24 2008-06-25 2009-05-26
2011-03-
04 (?)
Estonia entered the EU later 2007-10-
17 2007-11-22 2008-09-11
2010-08-
19 (?)
Finland 2004-01-06 2004-01-
06
2007-11-
29 2009-03-18 2009-04-07
2011-10-
21 (?)
France 2003-06-04 2003-06-
04
2009-02-
12 2009-07-30 2011-02-10
2012-01-
16 (?)
Germany 2002-06-20 2002-10-
18
2009-02-
19 2009-11-16 2009-08-14
2012-02-
24 (?)
Greece 2003-08-27 2003-08-
27
2009-02-
26 2010-03-04 2010-09-20
2011-03-
10 (?)
Hungary entered the EU later 2007-04-
23 2008-05-14 2008-10-22
2010-11-
16 (?)
Ireland 2002-05-06 2002-05-
06
2007-06-
11 2009-06-04 2009-06-04
2011-09-
29 (?)
Italy 2003-10-30 2004-10-
06
2008-01-
07 2009-10-13 2010-09-08
2011-01-
06 (?)
Latvia entered the EU later 2006-12-
19 2008-10-17 2009-11-12
2011-05-
30 (?)
Lithuania entered the EU later 2007-05-
17 2009-03-04 2009-05-04 (2012) (?)
Luxembourg 2003-07-28 2003-08-
01
2007-07-
04 2009-06-11 2010-12-22
2011-01-
21 (?)
Malta entered the EU later 2008-04-
21 2008-12-11 2010-01-07
2010-07-
06 (?)
Netherlands 2002-09-09 2004-04-
30
2007-12-
10 2009-01-29 2009-09-30
2012-02-
27 (?)
Poland entered the EU later 2007-04-
14 2009-02-06 2010-04-07
2012-01-
13 (?)
9
Portugal 2003-07-14 2003-07-
14
2008-07-
11 2008-09-23 2009-06-29
2011-03-
04 (?)
Romania entered the EU later 2009-01-15 2010-01-08 2012-05-
22 (?)
Slovakia entered the EU later 2007-07-
20 2008-07-29 2009-03-17
2010-11-
11 (?)
Slovenia entered the EU later 2007-01-
18 2008-02-07 2009-03-10
2010-12-
07 (?)
Spain 2002-10-04 2002-10-
04
2007-05-
03 2009-03-12 2010-06-15
2010-06-
21 (?)
Sweden 2002-06-25 2003-03-
27
2007-03-
21 2009-03-11 2009-09-14
2011-04-
15 (?)
United
Kingdom
2002-12-17 2004-09-
03
2007-10-
16 2010-01-12 2010-04-20
2011-08-
11 (?)
European
Communitie
s
2004-02-25 2004-12-
21
2009-02-
26 2010-03-29 (2012)4 (2012) (?)
SAA entry
into force 2004-04-01
2005-02-
01
2009-04-
01 2010-05-01 (2012)4 (2012) (?)
10
PRESENT SITUATION IN THE ACCESION PROCESS
Bearing in mind the fact that Bosnia and Herzegovina (hereinafter, Bosnia or BiH) is seriously
lagging behind other countries from Western Balkans on the way to EU membership, it seems
that Bosnia is a ―special case‖ or a sui generis country for the EU officials. For instance, a
statement delivered by Milorad Dodik, the populist leader of the most popular Bosnian Serb
party - the Union of Independent Social Democrats (SNSD), provides indicative signal of
unclear, vague, and complex relations between BiH and the European Union. In fact, Dodik,
with regard to appointment of Peter Sørensen as a new Head of EU Delegation to Bosnia and
Herzegovina, said that he has set measures and conditions in order to create good cooperation
with the European Union. In other words, Dodik asserted that Sørensen will have a partner in
Republika Srpska only if the solutions for Bosnian problems are not imposed from international
community1.
Thus, even before the international official started his mission in Bosnia and Herzegovina, the
Bosnian political elites have prepared some measures to be respected, and kept a look on his
interaction and work with local political representatives. However, this is quite an unacceptable
and paradoxical situation since the EU is in position to set the standards and measures to be
implemented rather than politicians from the potential candidate and candidate countries. What
we have in Bosnia is the fact that Dodik — and on other occasions, a number of local politicians
from all the three ethnic communities equally, namely Bosnian Muslims, Bosnian Croats, and
Bosnian Serbs — is interpreting the European standards and criteria according to their so-called
―Bosnian standards‖ built in particularistic ideological interests. As a result, the political positions
and views the Bosnian politicians hold clearly demonstrate the seriousness and depth of the
credibility crisis that the European Union states are facing in Bosnia and Herzegovina.
1 Šajinović (D.), « Nema razgovora dok se narušava Dejton », Nezavisne novine, 24/07/11
2Although it was thought that the process of European integration, which started in the
aftermath of the war in 1995, would bring political stability, economic prosperity and social
harmony to Bosnia and Herzegovina, it has not happened so far. In other words, most of the
strategies which the EU has used in Bosnia have ended in failure, except for a new state agencies,
police reform, and visa liberalization. Thus, according to the European Commission’s Progress
Report for 2011 which evaluates the country’s progress regarding the EU-related reforms, Bosnia
and Herzegovina has been lagging behind other countries from the western Balkans —
comprising today Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, the Former Yugoslav Republic of
Macedonia, Montenegro, Serbia, as well as Kosovo
It is a natural part of the Europeanization process that the European Union goads Bosnian
government to implement necessary economic, political, legal and administrative reforms as a
part of the country’s EU-related reforms through which it has been going through since late
1990s. However, Bosnia is for a long time in a serious political impasse due to different interests
of the three ethnic communities regarding the future structure of the country’s constitutional
framework and the country in general. Additionally, the EU is equally responsible for the current
status quo since its member states are not united in terms of proposed standards and measures
expected from Bosnian government.
11
69 Abramowitz (Morton), Hooper (James), « Re-repairing Bosnia after Dayton », Guardian,
18/03/10.(...)
European leaders believe that mere process of Europeanization of Bosnia will bring stability,
prosperity and genuine peace to the country. They expect the Bosnian political elites to make
required changes including the question of a constitution that might satisfy all three ethnic
communities. Yet, this is too a simplistic and one-dimensional view with regard to complicated
Bosnian political and social context. Although the Copenhagen and Madrid criteria propose what
are the standards, values and norms that have to be implemented in the EU aspirants, the EU
states have not sent clear messages regarding their expectations from the Bosnian political elites.
As a result, BiH political elites effectively manipulate with reluctance opinions coming from the
EU states. This is a serious credibility gap for the EU since it could not assert and prove itself as
a strong and influential actor that is capable of solving ―the Bosnian paralysis‖. Thus, leaving
Bosnians to explore the options that befall a failed state – located within Europe but on the
margins of its prosperity and unity – is to simply acknowledge a bankruptcy policy69.
70 Batt (Judy), art.cit., p. 1.
Despite the fact that the EU has utilized a number of strategic tools, instruments and institutions
in the post-war Bosnia and Herzegovina in order to help the country’s EU reform process, such
an approach proved rather weak, ambiguous, and even unsuccessful. For instance, very often
disunited position of the EU member states makes the role of the EUSR in BiH ineffective and
highly invisible and weak — as it appeared with former EUSR Miroslav Lajcak. Furthermore, as a
fundamental agreement, the SAA, has not generated expected reform processes and thus it
should indeed be re-examined in order to make it closer to real needs of BiH. Although it has
become more than obvious that Bosnia is a different case from the Central and Eastern
European countries’ integration process, the EU has treated the country as any other. No doubt
the EU leaders are often making the same mistake of ignoring the real problems of Bosnian state
because they believe that mere process of European integration will make the country more
democratic, stable and functional. Thus, the EU officials could make the same mistake from early
1990s since BiH ethnic leaders would manipulate with their reluctance and ignorance. As a result,
the European officials have remained in a vicious circle between the ―European values‖ and
extremely opposing interests of the three ethnic elites in Bosnia. Batt warns that « the EU needs
to rebuild its credibility in BiH by forging a unified position on a long-term strategy for the
country, actively engaging in the constitutional reform process and giving more effective support
to the next EUSR »70. Thus, probably the newly lunched EU strategy of enhanced EUSR headed
by Peter Sørensen, will prove capacity of the EU in helping Bosnia to resolve its political and
social enigma.
12
MEMBERSHIP CRITERIA’S FOR BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA
Membership requires that candidate country has achieved stability of institutions
guaranteeing democracy, the rule of law, human rights, respect for and protection of minorities,
the existence of a functioning market economy as well as the capacity to cope with competitive
pressure and market forces within the Union. Membership presupposes the candidate's ability to
take on the obligations of membership including adherence to the aims of political, economic
and monetary union.
-Excerpt from the Copenhagen Presidency conclusions
These membership criteria were laid down at the June 1993 European Council in Copenhagen, Denmark, from which they take their name.
The Copenhagen criteria are the rules that define whether a country is eligible to join the European Union. The criteria require that a state has the institutions to preserve democratic governance and human rights, has a functioning market economy, and accepts the obligations and intent of theEU.
Following the first high-level dialogue on the countries accession progress, held in Brussels on 27 June, both sides concluded that while Sarajevo had a clear perspective to become a member of the EU, it still needed to meet certain requirements before it could submit a "credible" membership application.
In the first half of the year 2012 the EU and Bosnia and Herzegovina have agreed to a road map on the steps to take before the Balkan state can officially apply for EU membership. The road map for the BiH's EU membership application was agreed on 27 June and foresaw submission of a proposal by Bosnia and Herzegovina to the Parliamentary Assembly by 31 Ausgust containing suggestions for amendment of the Constitution, by making it compliant with the Sejdic/Finci ruling of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR).
A first step - which would lead to the ratification of a stabilization and association agreement (SAA) with the EU - would be to ensure a political agreement on the Sejdic-Finci ruling and to change the constitution accordingly by November this year. The 2009 Sejdic-Finci ruling by the European Court of Human Rights found that the Bosnian constitution discriminated against citizens based on nationality, following complaints by Jakob Finci and Dervo Sedjic, a Jew and a Roma from BiH, who were stopped from running for high-level government positions. Despite the ruling, Sarajevo's current constitution still provides that only ethnic Bosniaks, Serbs and Croats can be elected members of BiH presidency and House of Peoples. The ratification of the SAA between the EU and BiH was stopped after the court's ruling.
But by the end of august 2012. The judgment for the Sejdic-Finci was not put in force; therefor other road map key dates could not be full field.
The European Commissioner for enlargement and European neighbourhood policy Štefan Füle and the secretary general of the Council of Europe (CoE) Thorbjørn Jagland expressed disappointment with the inability and unwillingness of Bosnia and Herzegovina to implement the road map for the country's EU membership application.
In a joint statement dating from 4 September, the EC and CoE representatives noted 'with great disappointment that the institutional and political leaders of Bosnia and Herzegovina missed the first timeline for implementing the road map'.
13
EU PROGRAMS AND BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA
Basic information about the EU Programmes The aim of the European Union programmes (formerly known as Community programs) is to support the policies of the European Union, and the enhancement of cooperation between EU member states and their citizens in a variety of areas: culture, science, environmental protection, transportation, energy, consumer policy, education, health, judicial, fiscal and customs policy, etc. Western Balkan countries have the possibility to participate in EU programs, established by the conclusions of the European Council in Thessaloniki in June 2003, to support efforts towards European integrations, sharing of best practices, experiences and knowledge, and the adoption and implementation of the acquis. The participation of the Western Balkan countries in EU programs governed by the Framework Agreement on the general principles of a country's participation in EU programs that are made for an indefinite period, but is reviewed every three years. With the entry into force of the Framework Agreement on the general principles for the participation of Bosnia and Herzegovina in Community programs, since January 2007. year, Bosnia-Herzegovina has opened the possibility of accessing certain programs. Accession process to the Programmes of the EU Following the policies of the European Union, not all programs are geared towards meeting the priorities of the Western Balkans. Therefore, the Western Balkan countries recommended a selective approach, gradually joining the EU programs, in line with the current needs of each country separately. It is necessary to take into account the available administrative and institutional capacity, legislative framework and budget funds to be set aside for participation in the program. EU programmes provide for the appointment of state coordinator/contact person for the program, with the aim of supporting and improving the country's participation in EU programs. For some applications it is necessary to establish a state agency, accredited by the European Commission, which would be responsible for the implementation of programs in the country. Full membership is achieved by signing the Memorandum of Understanding between the European Commission and the countries interested in joining a particular program, and paying "entry ticket". Memorandum prepared by the European Commission, after the competent State institutions express an interest in participating in the program. Memorandum differs from program to program, but basically the rules for participation in the program, administrative capacity, mechanisms for program management, and financial provisions. To the Western Balkan countries could participate in EU programs is necessary to provide sufficient budget funds to pay financial contributions, so-called. "Entry ticket". The state has the opportunity to part of the proceeds to pay admission ticket requests under the Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance (IPA). The amount of input maps that should be exempt from the state's own budget may be subject to negotiation with the European Commission. Review of the status of BiH to participate in EMP Bosnia and Herzegovina is a member of the Seventh Framework Programme for Research and Technological Development - FP7 and the Culture and Europe for Citizens program. In addition, Bosnia and Herzegovina to participate in programs in education Tempus and Erasmus Mundus. Although not a member of Lifelong Learning, Bosnia and Herzegovina can participate, as an associate partner in the activities of multilateral projects and networks, and on an equal footing
14
with other countries in the Jean Monnet sub-program. Participants from Bosnia and Herzegovina have access to two activities of the Youth in Action: The European Voluntary Service and Youth in the World (Activity Cooperation with neighboring countries). Bosnia and Herzegovina has initiated activities in connection with the accession of the MEDIA 2007 Programme and the Safer Internet. EU programs in which BiH participates Bosnia and Herzegovina is a member of the Seventh Framework Programme for Research and Technological Development - FP7 and Culture program. In addition, Bosnia and Herzegovina to participate in programs in education Tempus and Erasmus Mundus. Although not a member of Lifelong Learning, Bosnia and Herzegovina may be involved, as a partner, in the activities of multilateral projects and networks, and the Jean Monnet sub-program. Participants from Bosnia and Herzegovina have access to two activities of the Youth in Action: The European Voluntary Service and Youth in the World (Activity Cooperation with neighboring countries). IPA Component II – Cross-border Cooperation Within the framework of the second IPA Component – cross-border cooperation, BiH is
participating in six programs: three bilateral cross-border cooperation programs with Croatia,
Serbia and Montenegro, one cross-border cooperation program with Member States – IPA
Adriatic Program, and two programs of transnational cooperation South East Europe (SEE) and
Mediterranean (MED).
All programs are implemented through grant schemes and the calls for submission of project
proposals are published. (more information on each individual project can be found on relevant
programs web sites). Activities related to the implementation of the programs of cross-
border/transnational cooperation in BiH are under the purview of the Directorate for European
Integration/Division for Coordination of the EU Assistance Programs/Department for Cross-
Border Cooperation, International and Special EU Assistance Programs.
Serbia - BiH Cross - border Cooperation Program between Serbia and BiH
Year 2007. 2008. 2009. 2010. 2011. 2012. 2013.
BiH 0,7 0,7 0,7 0,7 0,7 1 1
15
Serbia 1,1 1,1 1,1 1 1 1 1
Total* 1,8 1,8 1,8 1,7 1,7 2 2
*) amounts in million Euros
Overall Objective of the program is to stimulate economy and decrease relative isolation of the program area through strengthening of joint institutional networks and human resources.
Priority 1: Achievement of social and economic cohesion through activities aimed at improvement of physical, business, social and institutional infrastructure and capacities.
Measure 1.1: Improvement of productivity and competitiveness of the economic, rural, and environmental resources of the program area;
Measure 1.2: Initiatives within the framework of cross-border cooperation aimed at the exchange of people and ideas in order to improve the cooperation within expert groups and civil society.
IPA Adriatic Program 20072013
The IPA-Adriatic Cross-border Cooperation Program is the result of joint programming work carried out by the relevant participating countries and is part of the cooperation process in the Adriatic area. The Program draws its strength and incisiveness from the wide experience, gained during the previous Program period producing concrete results from the studies and analysis financed in the past.
Year 2007. 2008. 2009. 2010. 2011. 2012.** 2013.**
IPA Adriatic Programme* 20 34 37 38 38 39 41
*) amounts in Euro *integrated approach – allocations by all participating countries pooled into a single, joint fund (ERDF+IPA) ** indicative amounts
Overall objective of the program is strengthening of sustainable development capabilities of the Adriatic region through a concerted strategy of action between the partners of the eligible territories. Priority 1: Economic, Social and Institutional Cooperation Measure 1.1: Research and Innovation; Measure 1.2: Financial Support for Innovative SMEs; Measure 1.3: Social, Health and Labor Networks; Measure 1.4: Institutional Cooperation.
Priority 2: Natural and Cultural Resources and Risk Prevention
16
Measure 2.1: Protection and Enhancement of the Marine and Coastal Environment; Measure 2.2: Natural and Cultural Resource Management and Prevention of Natural and Technological Risks; Measure 2.3: Energy Savings and Renewable Energy Sources; Measure 2.4: Sustainable Tourism.
Priority 3: Accessibility and Networks Measure 3.1: Physical Infrastructure; Measure 3.2: Sustainable Mobility Systems; Measure 3.3: Communication Networks.
Mediterranean Program (MED) The Mediterranean Transnational Cooperation Program (MED)
The MED program is a transnational program of European territorial cooperation. It is financed by the European Union as an instrument of its regional policy and of its new programming period. It continues the tradition of the European programs for cooperation (previously named Interreg).
The transnational setup allows the program to tackle territorial challenges beyond national boundaries, such as environmental risk management, international business or transport corridors. So far, 108 projects are running under the MED Program co-funded by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) up to a rate of 85%.
With a budget of more than 250M€ (whose 193M€ of ERDF), the Program will launch, until exhaustion of its ERDF envelope, calls for projects to build transnational partnerships aiming at meeting the priority objectives of the Program in the Mediterranean space.
Program objectives
• To improve the area's competitiveness in a way that guarantees growth and employment for the next generations (Lisbon strategy).
• To promote territorial cohesion and environmental protection, according to the logic of sustainable development (Goteborg strategy).
Year 2007.* 2008.* 2009.* 2010.** 2011.** 2012.** 2013.**
MED / 0,1 0,1 0,92 1,3 1,5 1,8
17
- amounts in Euro *) allocation for BiH; **) single IPA fund for all IPA beneficiary countries
Overall objective of the program is to improve the competitiveness of the Mediterranean area with the aim to promote growth and employment opportunities for future generations, including territorial cohesion and environment protection in the light of sustainable growth.
Priority 1: Strengthening innovation capacities
Measure 1.1: Integration of innovative technologies and knowledge;
Measure 1.2: Improvement of strategic cooperation between stakeholders in the area of economic development and public institutions.
Priority 2: Environment protection and promotion of sustainable territorial development
Measure 2.1: Protection and improvement of natural resources and heritage;
Measure 2.2: Promotion of renewable energy sources and improvement of energy efficiency;
Measure 2.3: Prevention of risks at sea and strengthening of safety at sea;
Measure 2.4: Prevention and fight against natural catastrophes.
South-East Europe (SEE) The South East Europe (SEE) Transnational Cooperation Program
The South East Europe program is a unique instrument which, in the framework of the Regional Policy's Territorial Cooperation Objective, aims to improve integration and competitiveness in an area which is as complex as it is diverse.
The program is supporting projects developed within four Priority Axes: Innovation, Environment, Accessibility, and Sustainable Growth Areas - in line with the Lisbon and Gothenburg priorities, and is also contributing to the integration process of the non-EU member states.
Year 2007.* 2008.* 2009.* 2010.** 2011.** 2012.** 2013.**
SEE 0,45 0,4 0,46 4 4 4,2 4,3
- amounts in Euro *) allocations for BiH; **) a single IPA fund for all IPA beneficiary countries
Overall objective of the program is to develop transnational partnerships within the fields of strategic importance in order to improve the process of territorial, economic and social integration and enhance cohesion, stability and competitiveness of the region.
18
Priority 1: Facilitation of Innovation and Entrepreneurship
Measure 1.1: Development of technology and innovation networks in specific fields;
Measure 1.2: Development of enabling environment for innovative entrepreneurship;
Measure 1.3: Improvement of the overall conditions and paving the way for innovation.
Priority 2: Protection of and Improvement in the Environment
Measure 2.1: Improvement of integrated water management and transnational flood risk prevention;
Measure 2.2: Improvement of environmental risks prevention;
Measure 2.3: Promotion of cooperation in management of natural resources and protected areas;
Measure 2.4: Promotion of energy efficiency and use of other resources.
Priority 3: Improvement of Accessibility
Measure 3.1: Improvement of coordination in the field of promotion, planning and operation of primary and secondary transportation networks;
Measure 3.2: Development of strategies dealing with the "digital divide";
Measure 3.3: Improvement of the overall conditions for multi-modal platforms.
Priority 4: Development of Transnational Synergies for Sustainable Growth Areas
Measure 4.1: Finding solutions to crucial problems affecting urban areas and regional systems of populated areas;
Measure 4.2: Promotion of a balanced pattern of attractive and accessible growth areas;
Measure 4.3: Promotion of the use of cultural values for the sake of development.
19
WORK TO DO AND CONLUSIONS!?
To become a part of the integrating European family Bosnia and Herzegovina have still much work to do to implement the strategies and road map for EU Integration. Especially the case Sejdić Finici is important because of the political discrimination which is now allowed by European Law.
Even it’s a political issue; B&H face a lot of problems to regulate the law system in the country so that it will be compatible with the European law system. The biggest problem regarding to that is the conflict between the entities and the state level, where the entities don’t want to give power to the state so that the state itself can give this competence to the EU level after the Accession.
Here the first step have to be constitutional changes so that the state level can gain the competences that are needed to lead the integration process and create a road map of reforms which will allow that Bosnia and Herzegovina will get the status of a candidate and step by step becoming member at least in 2020 or 2022.
Bosnia and Herzegovina have also the opportunity to learn and cooperate with their neighbor country Croatia which will be an EU country from July 2013. There is also work to do especially the ratification of the treaty regarding the borders between the countries, so that tis dispute will not be a break in the process of Bosnia and Herzegovina like it was for Croatia with the border dispute with Slovenia.
To conclude, Bosnia and Herzegovina have done some progress in the last years, especially in the sphere of opening the market for free trade and decreasing the state control. But B&H faces political problems and political crisis where the process of EU integration of the country is frozen and where internal stakeholders still prefer to hold the local power instead to help the state in the integration process. Constitutional changes are crucial, and establishing special relationships with the Republic of Croatia which can help B&H in the process is also a priority for getting a better position in the accession process.
The visa liberalization is a first step that shows that Bosnia and Herzegovina can control this issue, so that from all countries that get visa liberalization Bosnia and Herzegovina have the less number of citizens that search asylum in the EU. This fact is representative for the will of the citizens of Bosnia and Herzegovina to build up their country in that way so that they all can be a part of the European Union.
We think that Bosnia and Herzegovina is a part of the European family and have to become a
part of the European Union, not only because of the economic benefits but also for legal reasons
witch will bring the citizens of our country more rights and opportunities in the basic freedoms
witch are defined in the treaties on the European Union.