Download - Bp Cat Plan Risk Asses
-
8/13/2019 Bp Cat Plan Risk Asses
1/36
G uidance on the C ategorisation/Planning/Risk Assessm ent
and Im plem entation of Lifting O perations U KCS-TI-014
July 2002 Issue 3 i
Contents
Aut horisation for Issue
Am endment Record
Amendment Summary
Distribut ion List
Preface
List of Abbreviations
Paragraph Page
1 Introduct ion and Overview 1 2 Lift ing Operations Control and
M anagement Review Process 2 3 Roles and Responsibilit ies 6
3.1 BP PU Technical Authority 93.2 MHC Technical Support Engineer 93.3 The Offshore Installation Manager or Site Manager 93.4 The Site LOLER Representative 103.5 The Site Competent Person 113.6 MHC Site Representative/Crane Operator-Mechanic 113.7 Area/Issue Authority 123.8 Performing Authority 12
4 Training and Competence Assurance 12 5 Listing of BP Standards and Procedures for
Lift ing Equipment and Lift ing Operations 14 Table
1 Summary Descriptions of Lifting Categories 52 Responsibilities for Lifting Operations 73 Training and Competency Levels 13
Uncontrolled
-
8/13/2019 Bp Cat Plan Risk Asses
2/36
G uidance on the Categorisation/Planning/Risk Assessm ent
U KCS-TI-014 and Im plem entation of Lifting O perations
ii D ecem ber 2002 Issue 3/AM 01
Contents (contd)
Addendum 1 Definitions of Lift Categories
Addendum 2 Production Operations Lift ing
Plan Decision Flow chart
Addendum 3 Lift ing Plan and Risk Assessment Proforma
Addendum 4 Example Risk Assessment
and M ethod Statement
Addendum 5 Drilling and Well Services Lift ing Operations
Plan Decision Flow chart
Addendum 6 Proforma for the Approval of Lift ing Operations
from Uncertified St ructures
Uncontrolled
-
8/13/2019 Bp Cat Plan Risk Asses
3/36
G uidance on the C ategorisation/Planning/Risk Assessm ent
and Im plem entation of Lifting O perations U KCS-TI-014
N ovem ber 2003 Issue 3/AM 02 iii/iv
Authorisat ion for Issue
Technical Authority
Name: Peter Thompson
Signature: ________________________________________________
Date: ________________________________________________
Position: R egional Li fting C onsultant
Uncontrolled
-
8/13/2019 Bp Cat Plan Risk Asses
4/36
G uidance on the C ategorisation/Planning/Risk Assessm ent
and Im plem entation of Lifting O perations U KCS-TI-014
July 2002 Issue 3 v/vi
Amendment Record
AM O SAF.171
AmendmentNumber
Incorporated By
Name Signature Date Signature Date
For Audit Use
Checked
Uncontrolled
-
8/13/2019 Bp Cat Plan Risk Asses
5/36
G uidance on the C ategorisation/Planning/Risk Assessm ent
and Im plem entation of Lifting O perations U KCS-TI-014
N ovem ber 2004 Issue 3/AM 03 vii/viii
Am endment Summary
Issue No Date Description
Issue 2 January 2002 Second issue.
Issue 3 July 2002 D ocument title changed from G uidance on
O ffshore Lifting O perations Risk Assessments to
G uidance on the Categorisation/Planning/R isk
A ssessment and Implementation of L ifting
O perations.
The content has been updated to reflect the newtitle, in particular, the inclusion of a Drilling
O perations Lift ing Plan D ecision Flowchart, a
Production O perations Lifting P lan D ecision
Flowchart, definitions of the roles and
responsibilities required when lifting, and the
training and assurance requirem ents for these
disciplines. Further details regarding lift
categorisation have also been added and the
checklists in Addendum 3 have been updated.
Issue 3/A M 01 D ecember 2002 A mendment to the document and drilling
operations decision flowchart to include welloperations activities. A ddition of new proforma in
A ddendum 6 to supply required information for the
structural TA 's approval of lifts from uncertif ied
structural steel.
Issue 3/AM 02 November 2003 Issue Authority removed from document.
Technical Authority changed to Peter Thompson
from Patrick M cCrory.
D istribution List updated.
Issue 3/AM 03 November 2004 Paragraph 5 references to Contractorand Supplier M anagement documentation
(U KCS-CSM -001 and U KCS-CSM -002) removed
as these documents have been withdrawn.
D istribution List updated.
Uncontrolled
-
8/13/2019 Bp Cat Plan Risk Asses
6/36
G uidance on the C ategorisation/Planning/Risk Assessm ent
and Im plem entation of Lifting O perations U KCS-TI-014
N ovem ber 2004 Issue 3/AM 03 ix/x
Distribution List
Holders of Controlled Hard Copy
Copy Copyholder Location
01 D ata Control Centre (D CC ) O D L, A berdeen
02 Contracts M anager O ffshore Crane Engineering
03 M anager of BP contracts Sparrows O ffshore Ltd
04 HS& E Co-ordinator (K evin Pope) KCA D eutag
Virtual Copyholders
Copy Copyholder
01 D ocument Technical Authority
02 G ABZ SM S Notifications
Uncontrolled
-
8/13/2019 Bp Cat Plan Risk Asses
7/36
G uidance on the C ategorisation/Planning/Risk Assessm ent
and Im plem entation of Lifting O perations U KCS-TI-014
July 2002 Issue 3 xi/xii
Preface
Purpose
The purpose of this document is to give guidance on assessing the requirem ent for lifting plans
and risk assessments associated with rigging and lifting operations on BP Installations and to
provide a uniform approach to their implementation.
Review and Update
This document will be subject to 12-monthly review and update, w hen document holders will
have the opportunity to express opinions and suggest improvements.
H owever, the document control system allows for continuous update of this document. A s
such, any user may at any tim e identify an error or suggest an improvem ent using an
A mendment Proposal proforma which is available electronically on the U K U pstream SM S
website, from the D ata Control Centre (D CC) Supervisor or from the Technical Authority.
A ll holders of this document are registered so that they can be sent updates and be kept
informed of changes or reviews.
Responsibility of Copyholders
It is the responsibility of the registered copyholder of controlled hard copy versions to
maintain the accuracy of the document by ensuring that all updates are promptly
incorporated and acknowledged.
Furthermore, the registered copyholder of controlled hard copy versions must at all times
maintain custody of this document unless prior approval is given by the relevant
Technical A uthority.
The roles and responsibilities of copyholders and virtual copyholders are detailed in Section 1
of the Document Control Procedure (UKCS-D CM -001).
Uncontrolled
-
8/13/2019 Bp Cat Plan Risk Asses
8/36
G uidance on the C ategorisation/Planning/Risk Assessm ent
and Im plem entation of Lifting O perations U KCS-TI-014
July 2002 Issue 3 xiii/xiv
List of Abbreviations
A A Area A uthority
A LA R P A s Low A s R easonably Practicable
CoG Centre of G ravity
EC ITB Engineering Construction Industry Training Board
EM TA National Training O rganisation for Engineering M anufacture
FM EA Failure M ode Effect A nalysis
H AZO P Hazard and O perability
LO LER Lifting O perations and Lifting Equipment Regulations
M HC M echanical Handling Contractor
N SL North Sea Lifting
N VQ National Vocational Q ualification
O IM O ffshore Installation M anager
O PIT O O ffshore Petroleum Industry Training O rganisation
PA Performing A uthority
PU Performance U nit
PU WER Provision and U se of W ork Equipment R egulations
R TITB R oad Transport Industry Training Board
SM Site M anager
SM S Safety M anagement System
SQ A Scottish Q ualifications Authority
Uncontrolled
-
8/13/2019 Bp Cat Plan Risk Asses
9/36
G uidance on the C ategorisation/Planning/Risk Assessm ent
and Im plem entation of Lifting O perations U KCS-TI-014
July 2002 Issue 3 1
1 Introduction and Overview
By their very nature, lifting activities can give rise to hazardous situations resulting in
serious harm to personnel, damage to plant and equipment, and business loss.
This document describes the regime which will be put in place on all BP sites to
ensure that lifting operations are carried out safely, in compliance with the requirements
of The Lifting O perations and Lifting Equipment R egulations (LO LER) 1998, SI 1998/
No 2307.
The key components of this regime are:
Categorisation of the lift by agreed standard definitions
D evelopment and implementation of a suitable documented lifting plan
Suitable and adequate assessment of the risks associated w ith the lifting operation
Correct selection and use of appropriate equipment (refer to G uidance on Lifting
Equipment Supply, Control and O peration (U KCS-TI-012))
Involvement of personnel suitably trained, experienced and assessed as competent
by the relevant authorised body
Clarity on roles, responsibility and primacy notably where co-contractor interfaces
are involved
The approval, authorisation and, where necessary, endorsement of lifting plans and
their execution
M aintenance of databases of approved risk assessments and lifting plans, and of acurrent register of personnel competent in respect of lifting operations
Formal appointment of key personnel within the regime
It is BPs strategic intent that any additional technical expertise in the execution of lifting
operations will be sought from the BP Federal M echanical Handling Contractors (M HC),
who will advise Business U nit (BU ) Technical A uthorities and Site LO LER
Representatives in respect of lifting operations on BP sites. L ifting plans for all activities
shall be reviewed by the Site LO LER R epresentative before work commences.
Note: The Site LO LER R epresentative wi ll ensure an appropriate level of review of all
routine and simple lifting plans before execution.
It is recognised that most lifting activities on BP sites will be managed and supervised by
contractors other than the M HC, typical examples being:
Siting of new equipment as part of a project being undertaken by the engineering and
modifications contractor
Supply boat offloading/backloading being undertaken by the installation services
contractor
D ay-to-day pick-up/layout of tubulars by the D rilling and W ell Services Contractor
Uncontrolled
-
8/13/2019 Bp Cat Plan Risk Asses
10/36
G uidance on the Categorisation/Planning/Risk Assessm ent
U KCS-TI-014 and Im plem entation of Lifting O perations
2 D ecem ber 2002 Issue 3/AM 01
D ay to day handling of tubulars, drilling and well services equipment in the course of well
control activities involves a combination of routine, simple and complicated lifts. T hese
activities are categorised as being Routine D rilling and Well O perations Lifting operations
subject to full compliance with the controls and conditions laid out in A ddendum 1.
The assessment and planning of these lifting operations will usually be led by the
contractors who are accountable for the safe delivery of the overall activity, and it is
recognised that non-M H C contractors may have sufficient in-house lifting expertise to
assess, plan and execute lifting operations.
H owever, for the purposes of assurance of operational and technical integrity,
BP requires that the arrangements for those lifting operations categorised as complex
are reviewed and endorsed by the M HC Technical Support Engineer, (on behalf of the
BU Authority or Site LO LER Representative) prior to work commencing.
For those operations categorised as routine, simple or complicated, the approval of thelifting plans by a person suitably trained and qualified to EC ITB Level 3 in rigging
practices or equivalent, plus 10 years (m inim um) experience, (typically a R igging
Foreman) is sufficient, prior to authorisation by the Site L O LER R epresentative.
The Site LO LER R epresentative at his or her discretion may consult the M HC Support
Engineer for guidance and further endorsement if there is any doubt as to the
categorisation of any lifting operation.
The M HC will supply technical expertise to other federal contractors in the development
of arrangements for lifting activities, as requested, on behalf of the BU Technical
A uthority or Site LO LER R epresentative.
To ensure uniform approach to lifting operations and procedures across all BP sites andInstallations, it is mandatory that all pre-lift assessments should follow the definitions
and format laid down in this Federal document.
2 Lif t ing Operations Control andM anagement Review Process
In the interest of safety, several factors should be taken into consideration prior to any
mechanical handling lifting operation being carried out:
Responsibility for the planning and execution of the lifting operation m ust beestablished (who is in charge of the lifting operation?)
The lift must be categorised using one of the four agreed standard definitions
routine, simple, complicated or complex
An appropriate lifting plan (and method statement w here necessary) must be
developed by a suitably competent person, with input from those involved in
the operation
A suitable and sufficient risk assessment must then be carried out to ensure that the
plan will manage all identified risks to As Low A s Reasonably Practicable (A LAR P),
any improvements identified then being fed back into the plan
Uncontrolled
-
8/13/2019 Bp Cat Plan Risk Asses
11/36
-
8/13/2019 Bp Cat Plan Risk Asses
12/36
G uidance on the Categorisation/Planning/Risk Assessm ent
U KCS-TI-014 and Im plem entation of Lifting O perations
4 July 2002 Issue 3
Complex
Complex lifting operations require additional engineering input from M H Cs
Technical Support Engineer, Structural Engineer, or the operating sites equivalent
Technical A uthority for lifting operations and/or other specialist contractors. This input
should be included in the risk assessment and subsequent method statement and lifting
plan. T he specific plan is then reviewed at a Toolbox T alk prior to being implemented by
appointed competent personnel.
Table 1 gives an overview of the definitions of the lift types and examples of their
application. M ore detailed definitions of the lift types and the control measures are
included in Addendum 1.
Paragraph 4 defines appropriate minimum levels of competence for each category of lift.
Notes: (1) Where the lifting activities simple, complicated or complex are likely to
be repeated over time, the risk assessments, lifting plans and methodstatements should be held on file for subsequent review and reuse.
R outine activities by definition are repetitive (usually daily or weekly) and
as such, the assessments, plans and any supporting procedures should be
held on file. They must be continuously reviewed to ensure they are
current and reflect any changes to operating context.
(2) It should be noted that there is an important link between LO LER and
PU W ER (T he Provision and Use of W ork Equipment Regulations 1998).
In simple terms, PU W ER applies to all equipment including lifting
equipment; L O LER applies where the equipment is involved in a
lifting operation. A working definition, for the purposes of this federaldocument, is that if the load being moved remains static (in the event of
any failure of the equipment that is moving the load), then the operation is
not classified as a lifting operation even if lifting equipment is being used.
A practical example to illustrate this principle (developed from that cited in
the ACO P guidance to LO LER R egulation 2) is that of a winch being used
to move a load across a level surface. P U WER applies to the winch,
but LO LER does not apply to this operation, as the load stops moving if
the winch fails. H owever, if the winch was being used to impact a
sideways force during a cross-hauling operation, then LO LER applies to
the operation because, in the event of a failure of the winch, the loadwould swing about the point of suspension.
Uncontrolled
-
8/13/2019 Bp Cat Plan Risk Asses
13/36
-
8/13/2019 Bp Cat Plan Risk Asses
14/36
G uidance on the Categorisation/Planning/Risk Assessm ent
U KCS-TI-014 and Im plem entation of Lifting O perations
6 July 2002 Issue 3
3 Roles and Responsibilit ies
The LO LER regulations require that every lifting operation involving lifting equipment is:
Properly planned by a Competent Person
Appropriately supervised
Carried out in a safe manner
N ormally lifting activities involve several craft disciplines and authorities ( stakeholders ).
So any system set up to manage lifting operations safely must recognise this inherent
complexity and must ensure that roles and responsibilities and the competencies for
each activity are clearly defined, recognised and there is a shared view of interfaces
and boundaries.
This paragraph details the roles and responsibilities of these stakeholders. G iven thediversity of titles for similar roles across BP operations, contract strategies etc, the roles
below are generic, however, each site and Installation must translate and appoint to suit
their own organisations. W ith regard to lifting operations, some roles may be combined,
eg D eck Foreman and the Competent Person, but it is essential that these roles are
clearly stated in each site or Installation Safety M anagement System (SM S) document
and understood by all.
The generic stakeholders are:
PU Technical Authority
M H C T echnical Support Engineer
O IM /Site M anager
The Site LO LER R epresentative
The Site Competent Person
M H C Site R epresentative and Crane O perator
Area A uthorities
Performing Authorities
A summary of individual responsibilities is shown in T able 2.
Uncontrolled
-
8/13/2019 Bp Cat Plan Risk Asses
15/36
G uidance on the C ategorisation/Planning/Risk Assessm ent
and Im plem entation of Lifting O perations U KCS-TI-014
July 2002 Issue 3 7
Position Responsibility
PU Technical Authority Provide T echnical Authority role to the site/Installation
R esponsible for ensuring engineering studies areconducted to the standards required by BP
R eview and endorse lifting plans and method statements
for all complex lifts
M HC Technical Support
Engineer
D evelopment of method statements for complicated and
complex lifts
Engineering review of proposals for tasks identified as
complex lifts
Provision of hard copies for training course attendance
and qualification certificates
Ensure lifting equipment, including specialist equipment,
is supplied to the relevant BP LE standards
O IM /Site M anager Certify that the necessary systems, processes and
procedures are in place to manage and control lifting
operations on site
Ensure that roles and responsibilities for all personnel
associated with these regimes are clear and understood
Site LO LER
R epresentative
Implementation of B P lifting regimes on the Installation
A uthorisation of generic risk assessments for routine lifts
Provide assurance to the O IM (through documentary
evidence) that all personnel, core and 3rd party, have the
necessary training, experience and competence to
undertake lifting operations on site
Endorsement of method statements for complicated and
complex lifts
Endorsement of the list of persons authorised to conduct
lifting operations
A udit of process to ensure compliance with BPs regime
for lifting operations
Table 2 Responsibilities for Lifting Operations
Uncontrolled
-
8/13/2019 Bp Cat Plan Risk Asses
16/36
G uidance on the Categorisation/Planning/Risk Assessm ent
U KCS-TI-014 and Im plem entation of Lifting O perations
8 July 2002 Issue 3
Position Responsibility
Site Competent Person Continuous review of generic risk assessments for
routine lifts
M aintenance of paper and electronic copies of generic risk
assessments for routine lifts
D evelopment and approval of new generic risk
assessments for routine lifts as required
M aintenance of paper and electronic records of persons
authorised to conduct lifting operations
D istribution of listings of persons authorised to conduct
lifting operations
D evelopment of method statements for complicated lifts
Performing Authority (P A ) for complicated and
complex lifts
Supply and control of non-specialist lifting equipment
specified for the lifting operation
A udit specialist contractors lifting equipment for
compliance with BP standards
M HC Si te Representative/
Crane O perator-M echanic
Co-ordinate site requirements for rigging loft inventory
R esponsible for the safe operation of the craneduring lifting
M anagement and control of the rigging loft inventory
A rea/Issue Authority Ensuring specified documentation is supplied before
proceeding with issue of permits for permit controlled
lifting activities
Ensuring Performing Authorities for all lifting operations
are listed as competent for undertaking the task on the
work permit
Performing Authority
Ensuring all personnel involved with the lifting operationhave the necessary qualifications to implement the
category of lift being performed
Carrying out the Toolbox briefing just prior to the task
being implemented
Table 2 Responsibilities for Lifting Operations (contd)
Uncontrolled
-
8/13/2019 Bp Cat Plan Risk Asses
17/36
G uidance on the C ategorisation/Planning/Risk Assessm ent
and Im plem entation of Lifting O perations U KCS-TI-014
July 2002 Issue 3 9
3.1 BP PU Technical Authority
The BP PU Technical Authority is responsible for providing the technical overview for all
categories of lifting operations on site. He is responsible for ensuring that all complicatedand complex lifting operations are engineered to the relevant standards and for
reviewing and approving, and/or endorsing as appropriate the method statements and
lifting plans for these categories of lift, prior to their im plementation offshore. He is also
responsible for ensuring that the appointed Site LO LER R epresentatives and Competent
Persons have the necessary competence for the control of lifting equipment, and he
must provide support and advice to Installation/site management and Site LO LER
Representatives. T he PU Technical Authority is responsible for ensuring that the
interface with the M HC runs smoothly and an appropriate involvement and level of
service from the M HC is achieved.
3.2 M HC Technical Support Engineer
The M HC Technical Support Engineer is nominated as the person responsible for
providing technical expertise, in support of all complicated or complex lifting operations,
on the Installation/site. This includes the development of the scope and/or the
supervision of method statements, lifting plans and task-based risk assessments,
discussions with specialist engineers and contractors, ensuring all relevant engineering
standards are applied during the development phase of the workscope and that the
output from the engineering studies/assessments are documented and recorded.
He is also responsible for the review and challenge or endorsement of complex lifting
plans and, where necessary, complicated plans where other contractors have prepared
these, prior to authorisation by the Site LO LER Representative.
3.3 The Offshore Installation M anager or Site M anager
The O ffshore Installation M anager (O IM ) (offshore installations) or Site M anager (SM )
(onshore facilities) have overall responsibility for all aspects of health and safety on the
Installation/site. In order to support delivery of these objectives in respect of lifting
activities, the O IM /SM make two k ey appointments, one to a management role
the Site LO LER R epresentative and the other to a technical role the Competent
Person for the control of lifting equipment.
Note: To ensure that there is no conflict of interest, the two roles shall not becombined.
The O IM /SM shall appoint a R esponsible Person the Site LO LER Representative
under Regulations 8 and 9 of LO LER , S I 1998/No 2307 to ensure that good control and
management of lifting operations is being exercised on the Installation/site.
This nomination shall be documented, with the signed authorisation being displayed on
the Installation/site noticeboard.
The O IM /SM shall also appoint a Competent Person for the operation, control and
management of the physical lifting equipment under Regulation 8 of L O LER
to ensure that the issue of lifting gear on the Installation/site is controlled so that
equipment is only issued to persons who are competent to use it, and that the lifting
equipment is regularly checked to ensure continued fitness for use.
Uncontrolled
-
8/13/2019 Bp Cat Plan Risk Asses
18/36
G uidance on the Categorisation/Planning/Risk Assessm ent
U KCS-TI-014 and Im plem entation of Lifting O perations
10 July 2002 Issue 3
3.4 The Site LOLER Representat ive
The Site LO LER R epresentative has a managerial role, responsible for ensuring that a
regime is established and maintained on the Installation/site so that lifting operations arecarried out safely, in compliance w ith the requirements of LO LER , and for the
implementation of the BP Federal lifting operation and lifting equipment procedures on
the Installation/site (these documents are listed in Paragraph 5). This will require:
The authorisation of all lifting plans and risk assessments for all categories of lifts by
the Site LO LER Representative, supported by the M HCs Support Engineer and the
BP Technical Authority for lifting operations as appropriate. T his includes ensuring that
it is clear who is in charge of specific lifting operations, and ensuring that primacy is
clear in the case of co-contractor operations
Ensuring, by documentary evidence, that all personnel involved with any lifting
operations on the site have been properly trained and assessed as competent torelevant industry/national standards, and that a register of such personnel is
maintained on the Installation/site. This includes resident site personnel and any
ad-hoc personnel (such as drilling crews, wireline personnel and ad-hoc engineering
contractors). C lose liaison will be required w ith em ployers of those personnel to
achieve the necessary levels of assurance of competence to perform the specific
category of lifting operation
Ensuring that the issue and control of lifting equipment on the Installation is rigorously
controlled, in accordance with BP s procedures as laid down in G uidance on L ifting
Equipment Supply, Control and O perations (U KCS-TI-012), by the nominated
Competent Person for the control of lifting equipment. The lifting equipment shallonly be issued to those persons on the register who have the necessary competence
Providing the continuous in-house review to ensure compliance with the regulations
and Company standards and procedures
The nominated Site LO LER R epresentative has overall accountability for ensuring that
the BP regime for lifting operations is applied on site. The postholder should have the
necessary management skills to ensure that the framework is established and used by
the various stakeholders involved, and to identify and resolve issues of interface and
primacy. A lthough technical expertise in matters of lifting equipment and lifting
operations is provided to the Site LO LER Representative by the M HC, the LO LER
R epresentative must have a good understanding of the inherent hazards associated withmechanical handling operations and also be fully conversant with the requirements of
LO LER and BP procedures. Specific training shall be undertaken by the Site LO LER
R epresentative to ensure the necessary knowledge and technical appreciation.
Uncontrolled
-
8/13/2019 Bp Cat Plan Risk Asses
19/36
-
8/13/2019 Bp Cat Plan Risk Asses
20/36
G uidance on the Categorisation/Planning/Risk Assessm ent
U KCS-TI-014 and Im plem entation of Lifting O perations
12 July 2002 Issue 3
The C rane O perator-M echanic is responsible for ensuring that all servicing routines have
been carried out prior to the crane operation to ensure that the crane can function
correctly and is available to carry out the necessary lifting operations as required.
The ultimate responsibility for loads being lifted or moved by the Installation craneresides with the C rane O perator, who should satisfy himself that the operation in hand
has been risk assessed and included in the T oolbox T alk at the start of the shift.
N o attempt should be made to lift any load not subjected to an approved risk
assessment or included in the Toolbox Talk. H e will also ensure that all equipment is
returned to the rigging loft prior to rigging loft 6-monthly changeouts.
3.7 Area/Issue Authority
The Area Authority (A A ) is responsible for controlling lifting operations within their area
and for bringing any specific hazards to the attention of the P A that may encounter
during the execution of the work. Prior to authorising work involving lifting operations,
the A A will satisfy himself that persons carrying out the lift are formally deemed
competent to do so.
3.8 Performing Authority
The PA is responsible for ensuring that all personnel involved in the lifting operation are
suitably qualified and have the necessary experience to perform the category of lift
specified on the LO LER plan and risk assessment and that the lift is implemented safely
and within the level and competency of those in the team. The PA is also responsible for
briefing the work party involved in the activity prior to the task commencing.
4 Training and Competence Assurance
A ll personnel involved in m echanical handling and lifting operations on BP
Installations/sites shall be trained to the relevant standard, have the requisite experience
and be formally assessed as competent in the tasks to be undertaken. Training for
personnel involved in lifting operations shall be to industry recognised standards and
shall be undertaken at facilities approved by one of the following accredited bodies:
O PIT O , EM TA or EC ITB. The training course curriculum for rigging personnel should be
designed to assist the candidate to progress easily to the SQ V level for rigging andlifting, particularly for rigging supervision.
D ocumentary evidence of training and competence assurance will be required before
any person is authorised to perform lifting operations on the Installation/site. A register
of competent personnel authorised to undertake lifting operations shall be maintained on
the Installation/site, to assist with the control of equipment issue and with the allocation
of tasks. O ngoing competence of all personnel authorised to perform lifting operations
shall be monitored by the Installation/site competence assurance standards. It is the
responsibility of the employer to ensure that their employees competency profiles are
maintained and are current. The minim um acceptable training and competency standards
for the various disciplines and categories of lifting operation are set out in Table 3.
Uncontrolled
-
8/13/2019 Bp Cat Plan Risk Asses
21/36
G uidance on the C ategorisation/Planning/Risk Assessm ent
and Im plem entation of Lifting O perations U KCS-TI-014
D ecem ber 2002 Issue 3/AM 01 13
Role Category
of Lifting
Operation
Recommended
Training Course
Level of
Competency
Required
Suggested
Training
Providers
Craft
Technician
R outine and
simple
R igging Technician
(refresher training
interval 2 years)
Level 1 North Sea Lifting
(NSL)
Sparrows
O ffshore
A1 Services
R igging Technician Level 1
Banksman and
Slinging
Level 1
D eck/Site
Crew
R oustabout/
D rill and W ell
Services Crew
R outine and
simple
Forklift Truck
(onshore)(refresher
training interval 3
years)
RT ITB or
equivalent
NSL
Sparrows
O ffshore
A1 Services
Rigging and LiftingR igger A ll
categoriesLifting G ear
Examiner (optional)
(refresher training
interval 3 years)
EM TA Level 2/
ECITB Level 3
Certificate of
Training and
Competency
NSL
Sparrows
O ffshore
A1 Services
Rigging and LiftingSite
Competent
Person
A ll
categoriesLifting G ear
Examiner
(mandatory)
(refresher training
interval 3 years)
EM TA Level 2/
ECITB Level 3
Certificate of
Training and
Competency
and SVQ
NSL
Sparrows
O ffshore
A1 Services
Crane
O perator
Boat and
deck lifts
Crane O perator
(refresher training
interval 2 years)
O PI TO Level 3 Sparrows
O ffshore
Site LO LER
R epresentative
LO LER awareness Certificate of
Training
NSL
SparrowsO ffshore
AI Services
LO LER awarenessM HC Support
Engineers
PU Technical
A uthority
M echanical Handling
Engineers
Certificate of
Training and
Competency
NSL
Sparrows
O ffshore
A1 Services
Table 3 Training and Competency Levels
Uncontrolled
-
8/13/2019 Bp Cat Plan Risk Asses
22/36
G uidance on the Categorisation/Planning/Risk Assessm ent
U KCS-TI-014 and Im plem entation of Lifting O perations
14 N ovem ber 2004 Issue 3/AM 03
5 Listing of BP Standards and Procedures for Lif t ingEquipment and Lifting Operations
BP Controlled Documents
The following documents from the BP U K U pstream SM S detail BP s standards and
procedures in respect of lifting equipment and lifting operations:
Technical Integrity
G uidance on L ifting Equipment Supply, Control and O perations (U KCS-TI-012)
Colour Coding Procedure for Portable, Fixed and Circulating Lifting Equipment
(U KCS-T I-013)
G uidance on the Requirements for R isk A ssessment for Lifting O perations onO ffshore Installations (U KCS-TI-014)
Pedestal Crane Slew Bearing M aintenance Strategy (UKCS-TI-015)
O ffshore Pedestal Crane Inspection and M aintenance Strategy (U KCS-TI-016)
Third-party Documentation
BP endorses the following third-party documents as appropriate working references for
personnel involved with lifting operations on BP sites:
North Sea Lifting International R igging and Lifting Handbook (2001 Revision)
Sparrows Crane O perator, Banksman and Slinging Integrated Safe O perations
Procedures D ocument No SI 01_R 03A4
O ffshore Crane Engineering, L ifting O perations Integrated Working Procedure,
O PP-001
BS ISO Standard Cranes Competency R equirements for Crane Drivers (O perators),
Slingers, Signallers and Assessors
Uncontrolled
-
8/13/2019 Bp Cat Plan Risk Asses
23/36
G uidance on the C ategorisation/Planning/Risk Assessm ent
and Im plem entation of Lifting O perations U KCS-TI-014
D efinitions of Lift CategoriesD ecem ber 2002 Issue 3/AM 01 Add 1-1
Addendum 1
Definitions of Lift Categories
Category 1: Routine Lifting Operation
Routine, uncomplicated lifting operations are performed regularly (at least on a daily or
weekly basis) that involve basic slinging practices and the use of mechanical equipment
such as cranes, chain hoists etc, implemented by people who are suitably trained to the
required standards for this category of lifting operation and have the requisite
experience. O n most BP sites these lifting operations involve the majority of routine
deck operations, boat transfers and the unloading/loading of road transport vehicles etc.
A generic LO LER risk assessment, covering all aspects of these operations, m ust be
conducted and subjected to continual review to ensure any changes in prevailing
conditions are identif ied and taken into account. T he risk assessment must involve all
personnel involved in the execution of the lift and be approved by the BP site nominated
Site L O LER Representative for lifting operations. The technique and format for this
assessment should be sim ilar to that of a Hazard and O perability (H AZO P)/Failure M ode
Effect A nalysis (FM EA ) study where all applicable hazards are identif ied and control
measures put in place to mitigate the consequence of the perceived hazard. To enable
all aspects of the lifting operations to be captured, the A ssessment Team should consist
of all personnel involved in the activities, typically the deck or yard crew,
Crane O perator-M echanic, M echanical Handling Technical Support Engineer, site Safety
Adviser and the nominated Site L O LER R epresentative and/or the relevant Business Unit
(B U ) Technical A uthority. The product of the assessment should be an approved
procedure and plans for the routine lifts.
D rilling and well service lifting operations require a combination of competence in both
lifting and well operations activities. R outine lifting operations associated with
tubing/casing and other general handling equipment on the drill floor, BO P deck and pipe
deck can be categorised as a mixture of routine, simple and complicated. Therefore all
routine lifting operations associated with drilling and well operations is to be categorised
as routine and will require a generic risk assessment to be developed and approved. The
drilling and well service crew, providing they are trained, have the requisite experience
and are assessed as competent to Level 1 (refer to P aragraph 4 Table 3) m ay execute
lifts for well operations that are classified as routine, simple and complicated but only ifall the conditions listed below are satisfied:
The lift is for drilling and well operations and not for maintenance of associated drill
floor or well operations equipment
The lift is on or above the rig floor/pipe deck or other drilling areas, provided that the
appointed I nstallation C ompetent Person has agreed that the drill crew can execute
the lift
The lift has been assessed and the required lifting plan, risk assessment and, where
applicable, method statement has been carried out
The risk assessment recognises that the lift is to be carried out by the drill and
well service crew
Uncontrolled
-
8/13/2019 Bp Cat Plan Risk Asses
24/36
G uidance on the Categorisation/Planning/Risk Assessm ent
U KCS-TI-014 and Im plem entation of Lifting O perations
D efinitions of Lift CategoriesAdd 1-2 D ecem ber 2002 Issue 3/AM 01
A ll persons involved in using lifting equipm ent have received training recognised by
BP as equivalent to an O PIT O approved Banksman and Slingers course and will have
at least 12 months well operations experience in the previous two years
O ne person is appointed in charge and in control of the lifting operation. H e will be
qualified to a minimum of Level 1 rigging and lifting course from an O PIT O approved
training provider and must have at least three years well operations experience in the
previous four years
The Senior Toolpusher/Well Service Supervisor (or his delegate) will maintain a
register of persons appointed as competent to supervise lifting operations under this
dispensation on the drill floor, B O P and pipe decks
A form al, rig-site assessment is carried out by a D32/D 33 assessor, and persons
appointed to supervise lifting operations on the drill floor are also assessed within
1 month of drill operations commencingThe use of permanently installed drilling equipment like the draw w orks, bridge racker
and iron roughneck is already covered in existing drilling documents DO G S and their
competence and management controls and is excluded from this document.
This instruction is intended to ensure the safety of lifting operations for all routine lifting
and handling activities associated with drill floor, BO P and pipe deck operations.
A n example of the output from a typical risk assessment and method statement for
routine deck and cargo handling operations, carried out on the Eastern Trough Area
Project (ETAP) operating assets, is given in Addendum 4.
Category 2: Simple Lifting Operations
Simple or basic lifting operations are those lifting operations that involve the use of basic
lifting accessories eg overhead travelling gantry cranes or manual hoists suspended from
dedicated lifting structures such as runway beams, davits, padeyes etc directly above
the load. The load being lifted must have certified lifting points and the weight of the
load known. The persons involved in this category of lift must be trained to the required
standards and assessed as competent to perform lifting operations under this category.
These operations will be one-off tasks involving a lift with only a single item of lifting
appliance and one set of lifting accessories eg sling shackle eyebolt, being employed at
any one time. The use of generic lifting plans, accompanied by risk assessments and
Toolbox Talks, w ill be adequate for this category of lift. The plans must be developed by
the nominated BP site Competent Person for lifting operations and endorsed by the
Site LO LER R epresentative. C opies of plans and risk assessments should be stored and
maintained at the site in either electronic or paper format.
Category 3: Complicated Lifting Operations
Complicated lifting operations are those lifts which are difficult to implement, due to the
nature of the load:
Awkward shape
O ffset or high centre of gravity
Fragile
Uncontrolled
-
8/13/2019 Bp Cat Plan Risk Asses
25/36
G uidance on the C ategorisation/Planning/Risk Assessm ent
and Im plem entation of Lifting O perations U KCS-TI-014
D efinitions of Lift CategoriesD ecem ber 2002 Issue 3/AM 01 Add 1-3/4
Containing liquids
R equire the use of soft becket eye flat webbing-type slings
Lifts with loads equal to or less than 2 tonnes that have no dedicated liftingattachments
Lifts which require the use of non-certified steel structural support beams (refer to
the note that follows this paragraph)
The lift may require to be rotated, cross-hauled using two or more items of
lifting equipment, or for tandem lifting operations using more than one lifting
appliance. This category of lift must only be undertaken by personnel who have the
relevant core skills and experience in implementing this category of lifting operation.
They must also have been trained to the required standard, have the requisite
experience and be formally assessed as competent to undertake complicated lifting
operations. A Toolbox Talk will be required, addressing the lift to be undertaken,and copies of plans and risk assessments maintained at the site in either electronic or
paper format
For lifting operations categorised as complicated the method statement and lifting plans
will be developed by the site Competent Person(s), who must be suitably trained to the
required standards and experienced in mechanical handling lifting operations.
Note: The method statement and lifting plans must be approved by the Site LO LER
R epresentative and, i f deemed to be necessary, endorsedby the M HC Technical
Support Engineer. For complicated lifts involving the use of non-certified steel
structural support members approval must be sought from a suitably qualified
Structural Engineer (refer to the lifting operation approval proforma in A ddendum 6).
Category 4: Complex Lifting Operations
Complex lifts can be any of the previous three categories but with additional hazards,
such as:
Being extremely heavy or loads with significant financial value
Confined spaces, restricted head room
Lifting over live or unprotected plants containing hazardous substances
Subsea operations or involving D ivers
Lifts utilising floating cranes or other specialist lifting equipment or services
Lifts greater than 2 tonnes which involve the use of non-certified steel structural
support members
As for complicated lifts using non-certified steel structural support beams the
involvement of a suitably qualified Structural Engineer in the development and approval
process of the lifting plan is mandatory.
If the complex lifting operation is developed and implemented by expertise other than
BPs M HC, it is essential that the method statements and lifting plans are reviewed and
endorsed by the BP M HC Technical Support Engineers on behalf of the BP site T echnicalAuthority for lifting operations.
Uncontrolled
-
8/13/2019 Bp Cat Plan Risk Asses
26/36
G uidance on the C ategorisation/Planning/Risk Assessm ent
and Im plem entation of Lifting O perations
July 2002 Issue 3
Addendum 2
Production Operations Lift ing
Plan Decision Flow chart
NO
YES
YES
NO
YES
NO
YES
YES
NO
NO
NO
YES
CATEGORISELIFTING
OPERATION
PROCEEDWITHLIFT
REVIEWL
OLERLIBRARYOF
APPROVEDLIFTINGPLANS
ANDRISKASSESSMENTS
LIFTINGOPERATION
REQUIRED
START
HASTHELIFT
BEENCARRIEDOUT
BEFORE?
ISPLANANDRISK
ASSESSMENTSTILL
APPLICABLE?
ISITA
SIMPLELIFT?
USEOFCHAINHOISTS,
TU
RFORSETCUSEDFOR
S
TRAIGHTLIFTSWITH
DEDICATEDLIFTING
POINTSETC
LOLER
REPRESENTATIVEFOR
AUTHORISATION
ISITA
COMPLICATED
LIFT?
TANDEML
IFTS,USEOFFLATWEBBING
SLINGS,MANRIDINGANDCROSS
HAULING.UNCERTIFIEDSTEEL
STRUCTURESUPPORT
BEAMS
ISIT
AROUTINELIFT?
DECKOPERATIONS,BOAT
TRANSFERSETC
ISITA
COMPLEXLIFT?
OVERLIVEPLANT,
SUBSEA,ADVERSEWEATHER.
NON-STANDARDLIFTING
EQUIPMENT
PLANANDRISKASSESSMENT
APPROVEDBYNOMINATED
COMPETENTPERSON
PLANA
NDRISKASSESSMENT
APPROVEDBYNOMINATED
CO
MPETENTPERSON
PLANANDRISKASSESSMENT
ANDMETHODSTATEMENT
APPROVEDBYNOMINATED
COMPETENTPERSON
PLANANDRISKASSESSMENT
ENDORSEDBYMHC
MECHANICALOR
STRUCTURALENGINEER
ASREQUIRED
LOLERREPRESENTATIVE
AUTHORISATION
LOLERREPRESENTATIVE
AUTHORISATION
LOLERREPRESENTATIVE
AUTHORISATION
LOLERREPRESENTATIVE
AUTHORISATION
ROUTINE
SIMPLE
COMPLICATED
COMPLEX
PLANANDRISKASSESSMENT
ANDMETHODSTATEMENT
APPROVEDBYNOMINATED
COMPETENTPERSON
PLANANDRISKASSESSMENT
MUSTBEENDORSEDBY
ONSHOREHCMECHANICALOR
STRUCTURALENGINEERAS
REQUIREDAND/ORBPPU
TECHNICALAUTHORITY.
MAYREQUIREWORKPACK
Uncontrolled
-
8/13/2019 Bp Cat Plan Risk Asses
27/36
G uidance on the C ategorisation/Planning/Risk Assessm ent
and Im plem entation of Lifting O perations U KCS-TI-014
Lifting Plan and R isk Assessm ent Proform aJuly 2002 Issue 3 Add 3-1
Addendum 3
Lifting Plan and Risk Assessment Proforma
Paragraph Page
1 Rigging and Lifting Operations 1 2 Part 1 Routine Lift ing Operations Checklist 2 3 Part 2 Simple Lift ing Operations Checklist 3 4 Part 3 Complicated Lift ing Operations Checklist 4 5 Part 4 Complex Lift ing Operations Checklist 5 6 Lift ing Plan 6
Uncontrolled
-
8/13/2019 Bp Cat Plan Risk Asses
28/36
G uidance on the C ategorisation/Planning/Risk Assessm ent
and Im plem entation of Lifting O perations U KCS-TI-014
Lifting Plan and R isk Assessm ent Proform aJuly 2002 Issue 3 Add 3-1
1 Rigging and Lif t ing Operat ions
RISK ASSESSMENT FORM FOR RIGGING AND LIFTING OPERATIONS
R isk A ssessment No:
The object of the risk assessment is to identify and elimi nate any hazards in the lifting operation, define the
level of dif ficulty of the task and determ ine the skill level of the personnel required to perform that particular
activity safely. T his document w ill also highlight any needs for further training.
Category of lifting operation:
Person responsible for lifting operation:
Performing Authority:
Personnel to be involved:
D ate of lift:
P lease complete the result table below once the relevant parts of the risk assessment have been completed.
Result of risk assessment (tick appropriate box)
1 STOP!Further engineering input required
2 CAUTION! R igging personnel must perform operation
3 GO Proceed with lifting operation
If the lift is to proceed, please enter in the box below, any special instructions and/or safety measures to
be taken.
Name: Job Title: Date:
O nce the lift has been safely completed, please note in the box below any problems encountered and how
they were overcome, also any suggestions for doing the lift more efficiently/safely.
Job Completion Feedback:
Name: Job Title: Date:
UKCSTI014_002.doc
_________________________________
Uncontrolled
-
8/13/2019 Bp Cat Plan Risk Asses
29/36
G uidance on the Categorisation/Planning/Risk Assessm ent
U KCS-TI-014 and Im plem entation of Lifting O perations
Lifting Plan and R isk Assessm ent Proform aAdd 3-2 July 2002 Issue 3
2 Part 1 Routine Lift ing Operations Checklist
LIFT CATEGORISATION ASSESSMENT PART 1 ROUTINE LIFTING OPERATIONS CHECKLIST
Seven Basic Questions Yes No
1 Has the lifting operation been performed before?
2 Is there a documented lifting plan and lifting operation risk assessment
in place?
3 A re you experienced with all the lifting equipment to be used?
4 Has the load been checked and made ready for lifting (eg sea fastenings
released, hold-down bolts removed)?
5 Have you the experience to lift a load of this weight?
6 Is the lift in an area free from obstructions and other possible hazards?
7 Can the lifting operation be carried out without the use of soft eye flat
webbing slings?
If the answer to any of the above is No go to Part 2 of the Lifting Operation Assessment Procedure.
If the answer to all seven questions above is yes , proceed wi th the routine lifting operation in accordance
with the relevant lifting plan and/or risk assessment.
Assessment Part 1 performed by
J ob title
Date
UKCSTI014_003.doc
...................................................................................................................
............................................................................................................................................................
...................................................................................................................................................................
Uncontrolled
-
8/13/2019 Bp Cat Plan Risk Asses
30/36
G uidance on the C ategorisation/Planning/Risk Assessm ent
and Im plem entation of Lifting O perations U KCS-TI-014
Lifting Plan and R isk Assessm ent Proform aJuly 2002 Issue 3 Add 3-3
3 Part 2 Simple Lift ing Operations Checklist
LIFT CATEGORISATION ASSESSMENT PART 2 SIMPLE LIFTING OPERATIONS CHECKLIST
Questions Yes No
1 Is the lifting operation to be undertaken by a single lifting appliance only?
2 D o you know the weight of the load and does the lifting operation appear
to be straightforward?
3 I f the load is heavier than you normally handle, do you have the relevant
permission and/or permi t?
4 Is there a crane or certified support steelwork (eg runway beam or
lifting eye) directly above the load?
5 D oes the load have certified lifting points (lifting eyes/collar eyebolts etc)
fitted and if not, can slings be wrapped around easily (eg no sharp edges,
load not fragile etc)?
6 Is there ample headroom for the lifting appliance and slings?
7 Is the lift stable (eg centre of gravity belowlifting points)?
8 Is the lift balanced (eg centre of gravity in the mi ddle) or fitted with
special slings to compensate?
9 Is the load free to be lifted (eg sea fastenings released, all hold-down
bolts removed, not jammed etc)?
10 Is the removal route clear of any obstructions?
11 Can the removal (lift, transfer and landing) be performed withoutcross-hauling?
12 Is there a suitable laydown area and does the load come within the
allowable load bearing capacity of the ground/deck?
13 A re you experienced in using all the lifting equipment and gear involved?
14 Can the lifting operation be carried out wi thout the use of soft eye flat
webbing slings?
If the answer toanyof the above is NOgo to Part 3 of the LiftingOperation Assessment Procedure.
If you can answer yes to all the above, proceed with the lift as per the BP requirements for simple lifts.
Assessment Part 2 performed by
J ob title
Date
Note (1): To Supervisors: if you can give solutions to the above negatives to allow the lift to proceed safely,write the instructions in the box below. I f you cannot supply a solution, seek guidance from the
Site LO LER R epresentative before proceeding wi th the lifting operation.
Solutions to overcome the above problems:
UKCSTI014_004.doc
.........................................................................................................................
...................................................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................................................
Uncontrolled
-
8/13/2019 Bp Cat Plan Risk Asses
31/36
G uidance on the Categorisation/Planning/Risk Assessm ent
U KCS-TI-014 and Im plem entation of Lifting O perations
Lifting Plan and R isk Assessm ent Proform aAdd 3-4 D ecem ber 2002 Issue 3/AM 01
4 Part 3 Complicated Lift ing Operations Checklist
LIFT CATEGORISATION ASSESSMENT PART 3 COMPLICATED LIFTING OPERATIONS CHECKLIST
Complicated lifting operations must be carried out by qualified R iggers, or personnel wi th simi lar
qualifications and skills in dealing with awkward loads.
The personnel about to perform the lifti ng operation shall complete the table below. T ick against factors,
which are applicableto this specificlifti ng operation and indicate whether or not you have the relevant
experience to deal with them.
Experience
Identified Hazard App Yes No
1 Load has C of G above the lifting points or a high C of G
2 Load has an offset centre of gravity
3 Load has to be cross-hauled or restrained
4 Load does not have specifi c lifting attachments
5 Load is fragile
6 Load has a large surface area whi ch may act as a sail
7 Load requires two sets of rigging or two appliances for tandem lifting
8 Load has to be rotated (overturned)
9 Load is equal to or less than 2 tonnes and non-certif ied steel
structural support mem bers are to be used in the lifting operation
If you can answer yesto any of the above, go to Part 4 of the
Lifting Operation Assessment Procedure.
Assessment Part 3 performed by
J ob title
Date
Approved/Endorsed by
J ob Title
Date
If you have answered no to all of the above, proceed with the lift as per the BP requirements for
complicated lifts.
Note (1): To Supervisors: if you have any experience and can advise personnel involved in the lifting
operation how to deal with the complication, allow the task to proceed but only under
your guidance. H owever, i f you decide that the operation is outwith the scope of your
competence, please indicate the reasons applicable in the table in Part 4 C omplex Lifts before
passing it to the nominated Technical Authority for lifting operations on the site.
UKCSTI014_005.doc
............................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................................
........................................................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................................................
.......................................................................................................................................................
Uncontrolled
-
8/13/2019 Bp Cat Plan Risk Asses
32/36
G uidance on the C ategorisation/Planning/Risk Assessm ent
and Im plem entation of Lifting O perations U KCS-TI-014
Lifting Plan and R isk Assessm ent Proform aJuly 2002 Issue 3 Add 3-5
5 Part 4 Complex Lift ing Operations Checklist
LIFT CATEGORISATION ASSESSMENT PART 4 COMPLEX LIFTING OPERATIONS CHECKLIST
Lifting operations or conditions which would merit additional engineering input.
Reasons for Requesting Engineering Input Tick Box where
Applicable
1 The lifting operation involves divers
2 The lifting operation is subsea
3 The load wi ll be travelled over unprotected process plant/machinery
4 The load is extrem ely heavy and/or involves the use of non-certifi ed steel
structured support members for loads greater than 2 tonne
5 The lift involves a floating crane
6 The load is extremely valuable
7 The lift is in a confined space
8 The lift is in an area with very restricted headroom
9 O ther reason:
Lifting Plan/Method Statement and
Risk Assessment Part 4 performed by
J ob title
Date
Approved/Endorsed by (delete as applicable)
Date
UKCSTI014_006.doc
....................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................................
........................................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................
.......................................................................................................................................................
Uncontrolled
-
8/13/2019 Bp Cat Plan Risk Asses
33/36
-
8/13/2019 Bp Cat Plan Risk Asses
34/36
G uidance on the C ategorisation/Planning/Risk Assessm ent
and Im plem entation of Lifting O perations U KCS-TI-014
Exam ple Risk Assessm ent and M ethod Statem entJuly 2002 Issue 3 Add 4-1/2
Addendum 4
Example Risk Assessment and
M ethod Statement
Uncontrolled
-
8/13/2019 Bp Cat Plan Risk Asses
35/36
G uidance on the C ategorisation/Planning/Risk Assessm ent
and Im plem entation of Lifting O perations
D rilling and WD ecem ber 2002 Issue 3/AM 01
Addendum 5
Drilling and Well Services Lifting Operations Plan
Decision Flowchart
NO
YES
LOLER
REPRESENTATIVEFOR
AUTHORISATION
LOLERREPRESENTATIVE
AUTHORISATION
LO
LERREPRESENTATIVE
AUTHORISATION
LOLERREPRESENTATIVE
AUTHORISATION
PLANANDRISK
ASSESSMENT
ENDORSEDBYONSHORE
ENGINEER
LOLERREPRESENTATIVE
AUTHORISATION
PLANANDASSESSMENT
MUSTBEENDORSEDBY
ONSHORESPARROWS
ENGINEERANDBPPU
TECHNICALAUTHORITY.
MAYREQUIREWORKPACK
PLANANDRISK
ASSESSMENT
APPROVEDBYNOMINATED
COMPETENTPERSON
PLANANDRISK
ASSESSMENT
APPROVEDBYNOMINATED
COMPETENTPERSON
RE
VIEWL
IBRARYOF
AP
PROVEDSPECIFIC
LIFTINGPLANSAND
RISK
ASSESSMENTSFOR
DRIL
LINGANDWELLOPS
REVIEW
LIBRARYOFAPPROVED
GENERICLIFTINGPLANS
ANDRISKASSESSMENTS
REVIEWL
OLER
LIBRARYOFAPPROVED
LIFTINGPLANSAND
RISKASSESSMENTS
HO
LDTOOLBOXTALK
AND
PROCEEDWITHTHE
LIFTINGOPERATION
FOLLOWINGTHE
SPECIFIEDLIFTINGPLAN
PLANANDRISK
ASSESSMENT
APPROVEDBYNOMINATED
COMPETENTPERSON
PLANANDRISK
ASSESSMENT
APP
ROVEDBYNOMINATED
C
OMPETENTPERSON
NO
YES
ISPLANAND
RISKASSESSMENT
STILL
APPLICABLE?
NO
NO
YES
NO
YES
YES
NO
NO
YES
HASTHE
LIFTBEENCARRIED
OUTBEFORE?
ISPLANAND
RISKASSESSMENT
STILL
APPLICABLE?
ISTHELIFT
COVEREDUNDER
THEGENERIC
DRILLINGAND
WELLOPSLIFTING
PLANS?
ISTHELIFT
FORMAINTENANCE
OFDRILLING
EQUIPMENT?
HASTHE
LIFTBEEN
CARRIED
OUTBEFORE?
YES
YES
NO
ISITA
COMPLICATEDLIFT?
TANDEML
IFTS,
USEOFFLAT
WEBBINGSLINGS,
MANRIDING
ANDCROSS-H
AULING
UNCERTIFIED
ANCHOR
POINTS
YES
NO
ISITA
COMPLEXLIFT?
OVERLIVEPLANT,
SUBSEA,
ADVERSEWEATHER.
NON-S
TANDARD
LIFTING
EQUIPMENT
YES
NO
ISITA
SIMPLELIFT?
USEOFCHAINHOISTS,
TURFORSETCUSED
FORSTRAIGHT
LIFTS
LEVEL1RIGGERTO
PREPARELOLER
RISKASSESSMENTAND
LIFTINGPLAN
YESIS
ITA
ROUTINELIFT?
DECKCRANES/WINCHES
(INCLUDINGDRAWWORKS)
USEDINNORMAL
DRILLING
OPERATIONS
PROCEED
WITHLIFT
PROCEED
WITHLIFT
PROCEED
WITHLIFT
ROUTINE
SIMPLE
COMPLICATED
ROUTINE
SIMPLE
DRILLING
ANDWELLOPERATIONS
GENERICANDAPPROVED
LIF
TINGPLANSONLY
START
COMPLICATED
COMPLEX
LIFT
SUPERVISED
BY
LEVEL1
RIGGER
LIFT
SUPERVISED
BY
LEVEL1
RIGGER
LIFT
SUPERVISED
BY
LEVEL1
RIGGER
LIFTINGOPERATION
REQUIRED
Uncontrolled
-
8/13/2019 Bp Cat Plan Risk Asses
36/36