Transcript
Page 1: Building an Accessible Digital Institution

Building an Accessible Digital Institution

Brian KellyInnovation AdvocateCetisUniversity of BoltonBolton, UK

Contact DetailsEmail: [email protected]: @briankellyBlog: http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/Cetis Web site: http://www.cetis.ac.uk/

Slides and further information available athttp://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/events/cetis-2014-accessibility/

Cetis 2014 conference, 17-18 June 2014

Page 2: Building an Accessible Digital Institution

About Me

Brian Kelly:• Innovation Advocate at Cetis, University of Bolton• Was UK Web Focus at UKOLN, University of Bath• Professional interests include web accessibility, web

standards, social media, web preservation, …

Selection of Web Accessibility publications:• Developing A Holistic Approach For E-Learning

Accessibility, Kelly, B., Phipps, L. and Swift, E., 2004• Holistic Approaches to E-Learning Accessibility, Phipps,

L. and Kelly, B., 2006• Accessibility 2.0: People, Policies and Processes, Kelly,

B. et al, 2007

• A Challenge to Web Accessibility Metrics and Guidelines: Putting People and Processes First, Cooper, M. et al, 2012

Intr

od

uct

ion

2

Page 3: Building an Accessible Digital Institution

3

About This Session Subject to changeIn

tro

du

ctio

n

Time Title Who

Building an Accessible Digital Institution:What Can We Do Today?

09.15 Introduction BK

09.30 The Context BK

09.45 Group Discussion All

10.40 Review All

10.45 Coffee break

Looking to the Future

11.45 Introduction BK

11.50 Reflections and Directions AH

12.20 Further thoughts All

12.40 Conclusions BK

12.45 Finish

Opportunities for additional presentations

Page 4: Building an Accessible Digital Institution

4

About You

Briefly describe:• Your name, institution and

responsibilities• Your interests in accessibility• What you hope to gain from this

session

Intr

od

uct

ion

Page 5: Building an Accessible Digital Institution

5

The WAI Perspective

• xx

Web

Acc

essi

bil

ity

Page 6: Building an Accessible Digital Institution

6

How

WCAG’s four core principles

Web

Acc

essi

bil

ity

Page 7: Building an Accessible Digital Institution

7

Web

Acc

essi

bil

ity University Accessibility Policy

University accessibility policies are often linked to from all corporate pages (e.g. at http://www.foo.ac.uk/accessibility)

Page 8: Building an Accessible Digital Institution

8

Web

Acc

essi

bil

ity University Accessibility Policy

University accessibility policies are often linked to from all corporate pages (e.g. at http://www.foo.ac.uk/accessibility)

Page 9: Building an Accessible Digital Institution

9

University Accessibility Policy

University accessibility policies are often linked to from all corporate pages (e.g at http://www.foo.ac.uk/accessibility)

Web

Acc

essi

bil

ity

Page 10: Building an Accessible Digital Institution

10

In addition:• Conformance is binary:

no notion of reasonable measures• Is “just-in-case accessibility” always desirable?• See limitations in “Forcing Standardization or

Accommodating Diversity? A Framework for Applying the WCAG in the Real World”

WCAG’s Limitations

But WCAG approach has limitations:• Is dependent on browsers which conform with

UAAG (what to do with legacy browsers?)• Is dependent on authoring tools

which conform with ATAG• Needs to be applied to all

formats (not just HTML)

WC

AG

Lim

itat

ion

s

Page 11: Building an Accessible Digital Institution

11

Content Must Be Understandable?

One of WCAG’s key principles:“Information and the operation of user interface must be understandable”

Which is the cancerous cell?

WC

AG

Lim

itat

ion

s

Page 12: Building an Accessible Digital Institution

12

Content Must Be Understandable?

One of WCAG’s key principles:“Content and controls must be understandable”

What does this convey? 

Man against snow, Austrian Tirol 1974, reproduced with permission of the photographer: Professor Paul Hill

Web

Acc

essi

bil

ity

Page 13: Building an Accessible Digital Institution

13

Content Must Be Understandable?

One of WCAG’s key principles:“Content and controls must be understandable”

What does this convey? 

Man against snow, Austrian Tirol 1974, reproduced with permission of the photographer: Professor Paul Hill

What does it man to “understand” a surrealist painting? 

The Great Masturbator, S. Dali

WC

AG

Lim

itat

ion

s

Page 14: Building an Accessible Digital Institution

14

Teaching and Learning Challenges

Furthermore:• Assumes accessibility is a function of the digital

resource• We have argued “web accessibility is not an intrinsic

characteristic of a digital resource but is determined by complex political, social and other contextual factors, as well as technical aspects which are the focus of WAI standardisation activities”

Kelly, Phipps and others (2004-2007):• Importance is accessibility of

learning objectives, not learning resource

• May be several alternatives, including real-world alternative

• “Blended accessibility for blended learning”

Co

nte

xtu

al A

pp

roac

hes

Page 15: Building an Accessible Digital Institution

15

Challenges in E-Learning

What policies and processes do we need for:• VLEs• MOOCs• Provision of and access to learning

resources• Advertising courses• Course administration• Assessment• …

Ch

alle

ng

es

Page 16: Building an Accessible Digital Institution

16

MOOCs: What Is To Be Done?

Policies and practices for accessibility of MOOCs is needed.What should be done?• WCAG statement: all resources on this

MOOC conform with WCAG AA• WCAG aspiration: we will try to ensure

that all resources on this MOOC conform with WCAG AA

• Something else: But what?

Ch

alle

ng

es

Page 17: Building an Accessible Digital Institution

17

What Is Being Done?

Hyperlinked Library MOOC

Ch

alle

ng

es

Page 20: Building an Accessible Digital Institution

20

BS 8878

BS 8878: • A British Standard

Code of Practice• A framework that

allows definition of the process undertaken by organisations to build or procure an optimally accessible web site

What is to be done?• WCAG conformance statement• WCAG aspiration• Evaluate benefits which use of BS 8878 could provide?

Page 21: Building an Accessible Digital Institution

21

BS 878 In 88 Seconds Summary by Jonathan Hassell: see blog post and transcript

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GJ4MRCyMTRQ

BS

887

8

Page 22: Building an Accessible Digital Institution

22

BS 8878

BS 8878: • a framework that

allows definition of the process undertaken by organisations to build or procure an optimally accessible web site

What is to be done?• WCAG conformance statement• WCAG aspiration• Evaluate benefits which use of BS 8878 could provide?

For you to decide!

Page 23: Building an Accessible Digital Institution

23

Further Information

Video & slides of talk on "BS 8878 & the Holistic Approaches to Web Accessibility", CETIS Accessibility SIG, Feb 2011

I said:… still requires “conformance with WCAG 1.0”!

http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/web-focus/events/meetings/cetis-accessibility-sig-2011-02/

NB: auto captions emerged over time. To what extend might developments in the future help?

Page 24: Building an Accessible Digital Institution

24

Group Activity

Some questions:• Is BS 8878

relevant?• How can it be

used?• How should we

go about using BS 8878?

Page 25: Building an Accessible Digital Institution

25

Questions?

Any questions, comments, …?

Page 26: Building an Accessible Digital Institution

26

This presentation, “Building an Accessible Digital Institution” by Brian Kelly, Cetis is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 LicenceNote the licence covers most of the text in this presentation. Quotations may have other licence conditions. Images may have other licence conditions. Where possible links are provided to the source of images so that licence conditions can be found.

Slides and further information available athttp://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/events/cetis-2014-accessibility/

Licence and Additional Resources


Top Related