Transcript
Page 1: Collaboration & Virtual Worlds

Digital Collaboration Drivers and Opportunities

Ron EdwardsAmbient Performance

Page 2: Collaboration & Virtual Worlds

Agenda

1. Collaboration: The Issues2. Current Solutions3. Virtual World Solutions4. Implementing Digital Collaboration Tools

Page 3: Collaboration & Virtual Worlds

Trends: Transitioning to Knowledge Work

Page 4: Collaboration & Virtual Worlds

The Context

• The World of Work has Changed– Widely distributed teams: co-located people in

offices acting as though they are remote workers– Recruitment and retention: the demographic

profile - ‘digital natives & digital immigrants’– Diversity and Inclusion: it’s contribution that

matters– Current methods of team collaboration e.g. mail,

IM, videoconferencing, are only very partial solutions

– Travel is an environmental issue

Page 5: Collaboration & Virtual Worlds

Trends: Knowledge Work: Where?

Page 6: Collaboration & Virtual Worlds

Mobile Broadband Use Will Double in 12 Months

Page 7: Collaboration & Virtual Worlds

The Issues

1. Business1. Efficiency & Effectiveness: resulting from poor distributed co-

ordination due to inadequate collaboration tools2. Engagement for Innovation: high trust, close proximity teams

perform. Distributed collaboration over distance with poor communication tools often leads to low trust and poor performance.

2. Costs1. Travel2. Telecommunications3. Opportunity

3. Carbon: effect on environment from excessive/unnecessary travel

Page 8: Collaboration & Virtual Worlds

1. Business: Efficiency & Effectiveness

• Technology has made people more productive but most IT applications were not designed for collaboration.

• Dominant model is that people work individually and then merge their respective efforts

• “Collaboration often means pulling up your chair next to your colleague so that you can look at the same screen”

‘Mesh Collaboration’ Andy Mulholland. The Economist 25/10/08

Page 9: Collaboration & Virtual Worlds

1. Business: Engagement for Innovation

• Innovation remains key to growth. Trust is the key to innovation.

• In distributed organisations technology is known barrier to developing trust

• Existing collaboration technologies –audioconferencing, videoconferencing, team workspaces, document sharing – are only very partial substitutes to face-to-face meeting at best

Page 10: Collaboration & Virtual Worlds

2. Cost

• Travel:– “Considering air fare, car rental and hotel stay, we expect the

average domestic trip for European companies to increase two per cent, or €21, to a total of approximately €1,020 - Amex Business Travel advisory services vice-president Joakim Johansson. October 2008

• Telecommunications:– ‘For our global distributed mobile professional workforce our

biggest telecoms cost is mobile telephony’ Tier 1 Consultancy.

• Opportunity– “The cost of an alternative that must be forgone in order to

pursue a certain action. Put another way, the benefits you could have received by taking an alternative action.”Answers.com

Page 11: Collaboration & Virtual Worlds

3. Carbon

Source: UK Dept. of Transport

Page 12: Collaboration & Virtual Worlds

Summary

???Cost Business

Carbon

• Travel• Telecoms• Opportunity

• Efficiency• Engagement

ICT

!!

Page 13: Collaboration & Virtual Worlds

Much Of Today's Technology Leaves Communication Problems Unsolved

Source: Forrester Research, Inc. 2008

“Today, information workers use technology pervasively to get their jobs done — to communicate with others, complete tasks, and learn new skills.

– mobile and landline phones, – conference bridges, – email and calendaring, – instant messaging, – text messaging, – team workspaces, – Web conferencing, – videoconferencing, – project management software, – office productivity tools, – eLearning modules, – wikis, – blogs, – podcasts, – social networking tools.

But the vast majority of organizations deploy just a small subset of these tools. Even if a broad portfolio of technology is in place, it's usually just a collection of nonintegrated, disparate tools.

And where tools like these are available, widespread suboptimal utilization is common.

Page 14: Collaboration & Virtual Worlds

Now add in….the Dominant Work Model

• Dominant work model is that people labour individually and then merge their respective efforts

• “Its not much different from the age of paper….Collaboration oftens means pulling up your chair next to your colleagues so that you can look at the same screen”. ‘Mesh Collaboration’. Andy Mulholland.

Page 15: Collaboration & Virtual Worlds

Virtual Worlds…

Page 16: Collaboration & Virtual Worlds

The Exploding Range of Virtual World Communities

Page 17: Collaboration & Virtual Worlds

Virtual World Capabilities

Page 18: Collaboration & Virtual Worlds

2-D vs. 3-D

Walking, or typing in the name of a room, object or location and"teleporting" there. Zooming in and out and changing camera angles to view content

Scrolling to view content not visible around the environment on the screen. Clicking on links or typing or copying and pasting URLs to go to other Web sites or pages.

Means of navigating

Primarily visual, though text (e.g., on virtual signs and on documents) is supported.

Primarily text-based, though visuals of many types are supported (e.g., graphics, icons, photos, and videos).

Content

User can create, view and manipulate realistic or recognizable representations of objects (e.g., furniture),

The average user cannot modify content on Web sites other than to post comments on forums or blogs

Interactivity

Realistic or recognizable representation and simulation of objects, space, perspective, etc. Simulates gravity, day/night cycles, travel distances, collisions, picking up objects, and wearing clothes, etc.

Does not simulate real-world conditions…Realism

A person is represented by an avatar. In some virtual worlds, the user can also be an invisible observer.

In most cases, a person's presence on a Web site is unknown to others

Representation of the user in the environment

Rooms, buildings, islands, objects,.. Experience is borrowed from the physical world.

Web sites or Web pages, panels, windows, and frames

Organizational metaphor

3-D experience 2-D experience Dimensionality

Virtual worldsThe World Wide WebCharacteristic

Source: Forrester Research, Inc. 2008

Page 19: Collaboration & Virtual Worlds

Getting Work Done In Virtual Worlds Versus More Traditional Alternatives

A shared video experience without high-end expensive monitors.

Room-based videoconferencing, Web cameras (desktop video cameras), and telepresence systems like Hewlett- Packard Halo or Cisco Telepresence at the top end of the market (for hundreds of thousands of dollars to outfit a single room).

Videoconferencing

VoIP-enabled.. Easy to mix in multiple remote parties. Sometimes tied in with traditional conferencing systems so participants who are not in the virtual world (e.g., are on the road) can still participate by voice.

Torturous teleconference systems requiring voice identification and 15- digit access codes. Some systems don't allow for speakers to hear while they are speaking, which prevents them from noticing when others on the call want to speak.

Voice conversations

Put it on the virtual table in the center of the room and walk — or fly — through or around it.

reality mechanisms (augmented reality). Or reduce three dimensions to a 2-D

3-D model sharing

Typically use a series of menus for facial expressions and body gestures.

Can be done well using hyper-expensive telepresence systems and less well via in-room video conferencing and Web cams.

Non-verbal, non- text communication

All participants in the virtual room can edit that document in real time. When done, the user can save the document back onto his or her desktop.

Team workspaces, application sharing via enterprise IM clients. Real-time, in- line editing via a good user experience is sorely lacking in most of today's information worker tool portfolios.

Document sharing

You can not only see a visual representation of who is in the meeting but what they are doing

Basic (usually self-administered) Presence

Build a virtual room as large or small as you need. All attendees convene

Conference calls, video conferencing, telepresence.

Multisite conversations or meetings

In virtual worlds Using more traditional alternatives

Comparison criteria

Source: Forrester Research, Inc. 2008

Page 20: Collaboration & Virtual Worlds

Value Proposition

•Requires visiting installed sites

•Large download•Proven effectiveness•Easy entry for employees

•Same as audio•Single media sharing•Pay extra for audio or VoIP calling

•Poor participant attention span

•Discussion context

•No display of data

Challenges

•Face-to-face like

•Face-to-face like•Multiple media sharing•Appealing to Internet generation

•Familiar•Ubiquitous•Inexpensive

•Familiar•Ubiquitous•Perceived to be inexpensive Benefits

VideoConferencing

VirtualWorlds (OLIVE)

WebConferencing

AudioConferencing

• $1000s• $60 to $167 • $500 to $1000s

Costs(per person per year)

• $30 to $100

Enterprise Virtual Worlds Yield Immersive, Engaging, InteractiveExperiences

Page 21: Collaboration & Virtual Worlds

Virtual Worlds

• Replicate with some accuracy the experience of working physically alongside others

• Allow people to work with and share digital 3-D models of physical or theoretical objects.

• Incorporate nonverbal communication into interactions where important.

• Make remote training and counseling a more realistic option.

Page 22: Collaboration & Virtual Worlds

Virtual Worlds

“Virtual worlds are relatively inexpensive, don't require a great deal of startup technology infrastructure, and provide a naturalistic, immersive approach to simulating space, people, and objects “ Forrester 2008

Page 23: Collaboration & Virtual Worlds

The Need

• Shared private workspaces: secure, dedicated, accessible• Shared immersive and persistent spaces: real-time

engagement; resulting actions and activities remain over time• Shared access to and control of office productivity applications:

MS Office, corporate applications, video….• Shared ability to manage and extend the team environment• Secure: inside the corporate firewall if required• Integration with corporate networks e.g. Active Directory or

LDAP• Trusted: authentication; avatar identity• Carbon & Cost: cut carbon and cut costs

‘There must be a better way to collaborate’

Page 24: Collaboration & Virtual Worlds

Accessible

• Access via any suitable PC with broadband connection anywhere.

• Simple to learn: mimics and extends everyday human interaction

Page 25: Collaboration & Virtual Worlds

Immersive: Realistic & Persistent

• True persistent world• Real time voice – via VOIP• Highly realistic avatars – breathe, facial

expressions and gestures• 3D asset development in-house or contracted

out• Record and replay reviews on demand

Page 26: Collaboration & Virtual Worlds

Workplace Tools

• Standard office tools available in-world: MS Office

• Custom tools and data streams can be integrated

Page 27: Collaboration & Virtual Worlds

Secure Environment

• Environment is secure not shared – no inadvertent or malicious access

• In house or own outsourced server attached to secure network

• Multiple locations ‘in world’ can be used simultaneously

Page 28: Collaboration & Virtual Worlds

Identity

• Managed access to virtual workspaces• 2D photos wrap around avatar faces• Avatar name tags

Page 29: Collaboration & Virtual Worlds

NATO Meeting

Source: Euro Atlantic Defense News April 2009

Page 30: Collaboration & Virtual Worlds

OLIVE Meeting

Page 31: Collaboration & Virtual Worlds

State of the Art: 3D Visualization

Complex Data Sets GIS

Page 32: Collaboration & Virtual Worlds

State of the ArtImmersion & Co-Presence

Page 33: Collaboration & Virtual Worlds

Intronetworks

Page 34: Collaboration & Virtual Worlds

Mapview

Page 35: Collaboration & Virtual Worlds

Ambient SocialNet

Page 36: Collaboration & Virtual Worlds

Why Bother?

“Creativity is no longer about which companies have the most visionary executives, but who has the most compelling architecture of participation.

That is, which companies make it easy, interesting and rewarding for a wide range of contributors to offer ideas, solve problems and improve products?”- Tim O’Reilly, of O’Reilly Media

Page 37: Collaboration & Virtual Worlds

Performance Pathfinder

Step 1

Decide

Step 2

Design

Step 3

Develop

Step 4

Deploy

What is the problem?What are the best solutions?How best to deploy?

Page 38: Collaboration & Virtual Worlds

Questions?

Ron [email protected]

Web: www.ambientperformance.comBlog: www.ambientperformance.com/connection


Top Related