Comeback KidComeback Kid
SaaS Climbs off the CanvasSaaS Climbs off the Canvas
Comeback KidComeback KidThe Re-Rise of the ASP as The Re-Rise of the ASP as
SaaSSaaS
www.softletter.comwww.softletter.com
Comeback KidComeback KidSaaS Climbs off the CanvasSaaS Climbs off the Canvas
Merrill R. (Rick) ChapmanMerrill R. (Rick) ChapmanEditor of SoftletterEditor of Softletter
www.insearchofstupidity.comwww.insearchofstupidity.comwww.aegis-resources.comwww.aegis-resources.com
Quick DefinitionQuick Definition Software as a Service is…Software as a Service is… A hosted applicationA hosted application You rent itYou rent it Method of delivery not importantMethod of delivery not important
• Web interfaceWeb interface• Terminal servicesTerminal services
If they buy and install, not SaaSIf they buy and install, not SaaS Subscription pricing is not SaaSSubscription pricing is not SaaS
The MeltdownThe Meltdown From the late 1990s to 2001From the late 1990s to 2001
• More than 500 companies…More than 500 companies…• Received more than $10 billion in VC…Received more than $10 billion in VC…• And…And…• Made nothingMade nothing
The Meltdown The Meltdown (cont)(cont)
Why?Why? The applications suckedThe applications sucked Multiple warmed over “office suites”Multiple warmed over “office suites” Foolish predictions of the end of the Foolish predictions of the end of the
desktopdesktop Failure to account for “the piracy” Failure to account for “the piracy”
discountdiscount Infrastructure unable to support Infrastructure unable to support
grand dreamsgrand dreams
There Were SuccessesThere Were Successes Salesforce.com ASP poster childSalesforce.com ASP poster child HRHR Project ManagementProject Management E-commerceE-commerce CRM/SFACRM/SFA Anything NOT mission or data criticalAnything NOT mission or data critical
What About TodayWhat About Today No longer “ASPs”No longer “ASPs” Software as a ServiceSoftware as a Service
• SaaSSaaS SaaS Market GrowingSaaS Market Growing But still not that bigBut still not that big
• Gartner thought $7.4B in 2004Gartner thought $7.4B in 2004• Ovum thought $132B!Ovum thought $132B!
SaaS vs. Desktop/Client ServerSaaS vs. Desktop/Client Server(in billions)(in billions)
$0
$20
$40
$60
$80
$100
$120
2004
SaaS
DT/CS
But Thing Will ImproveBut Thing Will Improve Probably 10% to 15% next yearProbably 10% to 15% next year Things should get even livelier…Things should get even livelier… Maybe 30% to 40% growth over the Maybe 30% to 40% growth over the
next several yearsnext several years Much of the growth will be Much of the growth will be
cannibalization of existing application cannibalization of existing application basesbases
Much in new verticalsMuch in new verticals
Why are Things Improving?Why are Things Improving? Hardware infrastructure improvingHardware infrastructure improving
• 60% of Americans have high-speed 60% of Americans have high-speed accessaccess
• 99% of businesses99% of businesses• Better interfacesBetter interfaces
AJAX, DHTML, etc.AJAX, DHTML, etc.
Why are Things Improving?Why are Things Improving? Software infrastructure is appearingSoftware infrastructure is appearing
• SOASOA• GoogleGoogle• AmazonAmazon• YahooYahoo
Several idiots have allowed their Several idiots have allowed their data to be compromiseddata to be compromised
Data-protection standards are in Data-protection standards are in developmentdevelopment
Companies are Looking at New Companies are Looking at New Vertical MarketsVertical Markets
Distance LearningDistance Learning• E-learningE-learning
Shop ConnectShop Connect• Marketing for auto repair shopsMarketing for auto repair shops
Mark MonitorMark Monitor• Real-time domain monitoringReal-time domain monitoring
LiveCapitalLiveCapital• Online credit scoringOnline credit scoring
And the list goes onAnd the list goes on
And the Smart Companies are And the Smart Companies are Avoiding HorizontalsAvoiding Horizontals
Avoid “office” warsAvoid “office” wars Stay away from entrenched Stay away from entrenched
application markets dominated by application markets dominated by Microsoft, Adobe, Oracle, etcMicrosoft, Adobe, Oracle, etc
There is an ongoing struggle There is an ongoing struggle between “fat” vs. “thin” computing between “fat” vs. “thin” computing and you will be squeezed no matter and you will be squeezed no matter where you standwhere you stand
And the Smart Companies are And the Smart Companies are Avoiding Horizontals Avoiding Horizontals (cont)(cont)
Commodity products are not Commodity products are not candidates for SaaS because they do candidates for SaaS because they do not offer otherwise unaffordable not offer otherwise unaffordable technology to customerstechnology to customers
A SMB can buy Salesforce; it’s hard A SMB can buy Salesforce; it’s hard for them to by Siebelfor them to by Siebel
SMBs SMBs areare the Sweet Spot the Sweet Spot SMBs are where the action is:SMBs are where the action is:
• Firms from $1M to $50M are where most Firms from $1M to $50M are where most SMBS are making salesSMBS are making sales
Source: SoftletterSource: Softletter
Vertical markets are also a good Vertical markets are also a good place to be; targets can be definedplace to be; targets can be defined• There are 70K auto service shops in the There are 70K auto service shops in the
US; avg. yearly revenue $250KUS; avg. yearly revenue $250K• Focus on the M in “SMB”Focus on the M in “SMB”
SMBs SMBs areare the Sweet Spot the Sweet Spot When pricing is transaction- or When pricing is transaction- or
bandwidth-base, the larger the bandwidth-base, the larger the company the more attractive “own” company the more attractive “own” lookslooks
Smaller companies have CFOs who Smaller companies have CFOs who decide on capital cost (own) vs. decide on capital cost (own) vs. current expenses (rent)current expenses (rent)
The Economics are Very AttractiveThe Economics are Very Attractive Rapid growth is possibleRapid growth is possible
• Salesforce.com opened its doors in Salesforce.com opened its doors in 1999; by 2003 had reached revenues of 1999; by 2003 had reached revenues of $66M$66M
• SaaS model tends to under-report SaaS model tends to under-report revenue due to multi-year service dealsrevenue due to multi-year service deals
• Deferred revenue not reported on Deferred revenue not reported on current bookscurrent books
The Economics are Very Attractive The Economics are Very Attractive (cont)(cont)
Most SaaS firms are collecting Most SaaS firms are collecting revenue in advance or in conjunction revenue in advance or in conjunction with the delivery of serviceswith the delivery of services
This is contrary to conventional This is contrary to conventional wisdomwisdom
Subscription-based companies often Subscription-based companies often wait months to see invoices fulfilledwait months to see invoices fulfilled
The Economics are Very Attractive The Economics are Very Attractive (cont)(cont)
Predictable growthPredictable growth• Less “blank slate” projectionsLess “blank slate” projections
Development costs are significantly Development costs are significantly lowerlower• SaaS range between 7% to 12%SaaS range between 7% to 12%• Enterprise software between 20% to Enterprise software between 20% to
22%22%
Source: SoftletterSource: Softletter
And There are Some other Nice And There are Some other Nice BenefitsBenefits
Freedom from license compliance Freedom from license compliance issuesissues• PurchasesPurchases• ReceiptsReceipts• CertificatesCertificates
Best-business practices complianceBest-business practices compliance• Sarbanes-Oxley, section 404Sarbanes-Oxley, section 404
SaaS as a PlatformSaaS as a Platform SaaS companies are increasingly SaaS companies are increasingly
opening up their products to vertical opening up their products to vertical markets, i.e. Distance Learningmarkets, i.e. Distance Learning
An alternative to DVD/CD-based An alternative to DVD/CD-based content programscontent programs
The company has a developing OEM The company has a developing OEM marketmarket• Application for the retail car marketApplication for the retail car market
Some Reality ChecksSome Reality Checks Sales and marketing costs are no Sales and marketing costs are no
lower than those faced by traditional lower than those faced by traditional software companiessoftware companies• 20% to 24% privately-held firms20% to 24% privately-held firms• 40% + for public companies (with the 40% + for public companies (with the
exception of Microsoft)exception of Microsoft) SaaS 45%+ sales and marketing SaaS 45%+ sales and marketing
costs (source: Softletter)costs (source: Softletter)
Some Reality Checks Some Reality Checks (cont)(cont)
Traditional licensing empowers Traditional licensing empowers vendor lock-invendor lock-in• They pay a big amount of money up They pay a big amount of money up
front (eventually)front (eventually)• They pay even if the product has a few They pay even if the product has a few
“issues”“issues” SaaS removes much of this leverageSaaS removes much of this leverage
• Switching is still painful, but they can Switching is still painful, but they can fund it out of that big lump of dollars fund it out of that big lump of dollars they didn’t give you upfrontthey didn’t give you upfront
More Reality ChecksMore Reality Checks As mentioned, cannibalization is As mentioned, cannibalization is
inevitable for companies selling inevitable for companies selling licenseslicenses
Your SaaS product will appeal to Your SaaS product will appeal to SMBs/verticals in its first iterationSMBs/verticals in its first iteration
A focused subset of featuresA focused subset of features A steady bulking up of the productA steady bulking up of the product Parity achieved in about two to three Parity achieved in about two to three
release cyclesrelease cycles
Pricing IssuesPricing Issues For SaaS, it’s a volume gameFor SaaS, it’s a volume game
• New customer costs are very low:New customer costs are very low: $.10 to $.50, on average (Source: Softletter)$.10 to $.50, on average (Source: Softletter)
Pricing models are becoming Pricing models are becoming increasingly granularincreasingly granular• Heavy volume users of your product are Heavy volume users of your product are
your least profitable customeryour least profitable customer
Pricing Issues Pricing Issues (cont)(cont)
Most pricing models have three to Most pricing models have three to five tiersfive tiers
You WILL be tied to a license model if You WILL be tied to a license model if you have an installed baseyou have an installed base
You can also charge for:You can also charge for:• BandwidthBandwidth• StorageStorage
But customer acquisition needs will But customer acquisition needs will squelch many of these attemptssquelch many of these attempts
Service IssuesService Issues An era of “white glove” customer An era of “white glove” customer
service is comingservice is coming Companies we have interviewed Companies we have interviewed
estimate that customer service is estimate that customer service is going to become a significant cost going to become a significant cost center: 15% to 20%center: 15% to 20%
The SaaS model requires you to be The SaaS model requires you to be nicenice to people; no one is the phone to people; no one is the phone company (yet)company (yet)
SLA IssuesSLA Issues In a sense, the issue of SLAs is In a sense, the issue of SLAs is
almost not relevant to the SaaS almost not relevant to the SaaS marketmarket
Yes, there will be SLAsYes, there will be SLAs But…But… If your product doesn’t do what it If your product doesn’t do what it
says, there’s nowhere to hidesays, there’s nowhere to hide
Salesforce ManagementSalesforce Management A tremendous change in mindsetA tremendous change in mindset The traditional $50K, 5%, $1M a year The traditional $50K, 5%, $1M a year
paradigm does not fit well with the paradigm does not fit well with the SaaS modelSaaS model
Significant SaaS sales require Significant SaaS sales require cultivation over timecultivation over time
Salesforce Management Salesforce Management (cont)(cont)
Significantly higher commissions Significantly higher commissions upfrontupfront• As high as 40%As high as 40%
Then a steady ramp down as the Then a steady ramp down as the account growsaccount grows• Decrement in stages to between 5% to Decrement in stages to between 5% to
10%10%
Salesforce Management Salesforce Management (cont)(cont)
The trick is to balance the need to The trick is to balance the need to develop new account vs. the develop new account vs. the necessity of nurturing existing necessity of nurturing existing businessbusiness
Attempts to cut off the account from Attempts to cut off the account from the salesforce have not been very the salesforce have not been very successful; relationships and successful; relationships and professionalism are lostprofessionalism are lost
Comeback KidComeback KidThe Re-Rise of the ASP as SaaSThe Re-Rise of the ASP as SaaS
www.softletter.comwww.softletter.com