Download - Continuous Performance Improvement Through …medxellence.pesgce.com/presentation_pdf/06-02-2017_1204pmS17 LSS...Continuous Performance Improvement Through Lean ... • Introduce Lean

8-1

Continuous Performance Improvement Through Lean Six Sigma in the Military Health System

Gaston M. Randolph, Jr.Director, Strategy ManagementUS Army Medical Command/Office of The Surgeon [email protected]: 703.681.3015

8-2

Disclosures

Presenter has no financial interest to disclose.

This continuing education activity is managed and accredited by Professional Education Services Group in cooperation with the MedXellence Program. PESG, MedXellence Staff, and accrediting organization do not support or endorse any product or service mentioned in this activity.

PESG and MedXellence Program Staff have no financial interest to disclose.

8-3

Learning Objectives

At the conclusion of this activity, the participant will be able to:• Introduce Lean Six Sigma as a management system for

achieving measurable results• Understand the required infrastructure for Lean Six Sigma• Understand the general structure of the DMAIC methodology

8-4

• QDR Mandate

Agenda

8-5

• QDR Mandate• Lean Six Sigma (LSS) Basics

Agenda

8-6

• QDR Mandate• Lean Six Sigma (LSS) Basics• LSS “Fit” in Strategic Performance Execution

Agenda

8-7

• QDR Mandate• Lean Six Sigma (LSS) Basics• LSS “Fit” in Strategic Performance Execution• Linking Strategy to Performance Improvement

Agenda

8-8

• QDR Mandate• Lean Six Sigma (LSS) Basics• LSS “Fit” in Strategic Performance Execution• Linking Strategy to Performance Improvement • Lessons Learned

Agenda

8-9

MHS QDR Mandate

Everyone in DoD must adopt some form of

Continuous Process Improvement

8-10

• Select the CPI method most appropriate for the MHS

MHS QDR Mandate

8-11

• Select the CPI method most appropriate for the MHS— common vocabulary, toolsets

MHS QDR Mandate

8-12


• Implement across all MHS components in a consistent fashion

MHS QDR Mandate

8-13


• Implement across all MHS components in a consistent fashion— learn, grow together

MHS QDR Mandate

8-14



• Accelerate MHS’ CPI “journey” from current stage

MHS QDR Mandate

8-15



• Accelerate MHS’ CPI “journey” from current stage— improve sooner rather than later

MHS QDR Mandate

8-16

MHS Review

High-Reliability Health Care: Getting There from Here. Mark R. Chassin and Jerod M. Loeb, The Milbank Quarterly, Vol. 91, No 3, 2013 (pp 459-490)

8-17

Three Changes for HRO

• Leadership commitment to zero patient harm• Incorporation of all principles and practices of

a Safety Culture throughout the organization• Widespread adoption and deployment of the

most effective of Process Improvement tools and methods (Lean, Six Sigma, Change Management)

8-18

Appropriate to roleRequired for all

staffOnboardingCEMin

Requirements for GB/BB

Standardized toolkitStandard process

for documentation: PowerSteering

Routine performance monitoring Gap Identified

Event ManagementSafetyErrorAdverse

OutcomeNear MissComplaint

Work section or Unit-wideProject TypeChange EventStandard WorkA3/RIEDMAIC

Draft Project Charter

Work section: Change event or Lean Project Unit-Wide:Assign Project

Sponsor/BeltComplete Draft

Project ChartersResourceExecute project

Capture results in PowerSteeringCommunicate Monitor metricsCelebrate

successes and replicate

Train Organization

1 PI Need Identified

2 Document Event / Select

Approach

3 Prioritize, Resource,

and Execute

4 Capture, Share and

Monitor

5

Project Dashboard

Robust Process ImprovementEnabling a HRO

8-19

Lean Six Sigma Basics

8-20

…LSS Builds Upon aFoundationof Continuous Performance

Improvement!

CraftProductionEli Whitney -

ProductStandards

Shewhart –StatisticalMethods

Juran –ProcessAnalysis

IndustrialProduction

StatisticalProcess Control

QualityControl

Taguchi –Customer

Focus

QualityEngineering

Deming –SystemsThinking

TQM -Total QualityManagementSmith

(Motorola) –Statistical

Rigor SixSigma v1

Welch/Bossidy –

OrganizationalInfrastructure Six

Sigma v2

Taylor –Time/Motion

Studies

ScientificManagement

Ford –Work

Analysis

AssemblyLine Manufacturing

Sloan –Modern

Management

OrganizedLabor –Worker’s

RightsMass

Production

Toyoda,Ohno,Shingo

ToyotaProduction

System

Womack& Jones

LeanEnterprise

George, ITT Industries,

CAT, Xerox

Lean SixSigma v1

Harry –DMAIC

SimplifiedManufacturing

SimplifiedService/Process

George & Wilson –OptimizedComplexity

Lean SixSigma v2

Tunner –Berlin Airlift

SimplifiedProduct Line

Zero Defects

Gilbreth

8-21

LSS Basics• Industry best practice management framework

combines “Lean” and “Six Sigma” strategies

8-22

• Industry best practice management framework combines “Lean” and “Six Sigma” strategies

• “Lean” methods…

LSS Basics

8-23


• “Lean” methods…• Remove non-value added waste from processes• Thus, reduce process lead time• Happy customers—reduced cost!

LSS Basics

8-24



• “Six Sigma” methods…

LSS Basics

8-25



• “Six Sigma” methods…• Analyze and reduce variability in processes• Thus, improve quality• More happy customers—more reduced cost!

LSS Basics

8-26

What’s Different About LSS?

8-27

• Prescriptive framework…vs descriptive framework

What’s Different About LSS?This is…

8-28


• Trained experts leading trained project teams…vs reading a book and trying it on the fly


8-29



• Execution pervades the organization…vs “that’s the QA Department’s job”


8-30



• Execution pervades the organization…vs “that’s the QA Department’s job”

• Data-driven project selection and improvements…vs guessing, windage, shooting from the hip


8-31

LSS Basics: InfrastructureNeeded to Succeed!

At each level of organizations:

Green Belt(s)

Black Belt Black Belt Green Belt Green Belt

Organization’sSenior Leader

Process OwnerProcess Owner

Project Team Member(s)

Project Team Member(s)

…

MasterBlack Belt

Deployment Director

…

Full-time Positions

Process Owner

Project SupportMentor

Financial Analyst

Financial Analyst

• Senior Leader• Deployment Director• Senior Financial Mgr• Critical Process Owners• Master Black Belt (Advisor)

Executive Steering Committee

Recommended LSS Infrastructure Based on Industry Best Practice

8-32

Multi-level/multi-phased training:Training: Training & Certification

Executive Leader Green BeltProject Sponsor Black BeltProject ID/Selection Master Black BeltProject Team/Yellow BeltOrganizational Awareness

LSS Basics: Training/Certification

8-33

LSS Basics: Training/Certification

Project Sponsor Trng

Assessment

MBB Trng

BB/GB Trng

Project ID & Selection Wksp

Harvest Results and Share Know

ledge

Contractor Mentoring & Consulting

Month 1 Month 2 Month 3 Month 4 Month 5 Month 6 Month 12 Month 18 Month 24+

Stand-up Program Perform Projects

Organizational Awareness Trng

Multi-level/multi-phased training:Training: Training & Certification

Executive Leader Green BeltProject Sponsor Black BeltProject ID/Selection Master Black BeltProject Team/Yellow BeltOrganizational Awareness

Executive Leader Trng

Project Team Trng

8-34

Structured Project Selection

ProjectCandidates

• Customer Issues/Opportunities• Business Strategy• Goals/Objectives• Priorities

LSS Basics: Project Execution

8-35

Prioritized by Leader/Mgmt

TeamProject

Candidates


BEN

EFIT

Low

Med

Hig

h

EFFORTLow Med High



8-36


TeamProject

Candidates


BEN

EFIT

Low

Med

Hig

h

EFFORTLow Med High


Assign Projectto Sponsor and Select

Belt


8-37


TeamProject

Candidates


BEN

EFIT

Low

Med

Hig

h

EFFORTLow Med High


Define Measure Analyze Improve Control

Define project purpose and scopeMeasure current performanceAnalyze causes & confirm with dataImprove by removing variation and

non-value added activitiesControl gains by standardizing

DMAIC Project Management Framework

Sponsor inspects deliverables & checkpoints for each phase


Belt


8-38


TeamProject

Candidates


BEN

EFIT

Low

Med

Hig

h

EFFORTLow Med High








Belt


8-39


TeamProject

Candidates


BEN

EFIT

Low

Med

Hig

h

EFFORTLow Med High








Belt


8-40


TeamProject

Candidates


BEN

EFIT

Low

Med

Hig

h

EFFORTLow Med High








Belt


8-41


TeamProject

Candidates


BEN

EFIT

Low

Med

Hig

h

EFFORTLow Med High








Belt


8-42


TeamProject

Candidates


BEN

EFIT

Low

Med

Hig

h

EFFORTLow Med High


Sponsor InspectsProgress







Belt


8-43


TeamProject

Candidates


BEN

EFIT

Low

Med

Hig

h

EFFORTLow Med High






Results are Captured and

Sustained




Belt


8-44


TeamProject

Candidates


BEN

EFIT

Low

Med

Hig

h

EFFORTLow Med High






Results are Captured and

Sustained




Belt


8-45

LSS “Fits” in Your Toolkit!

• Must have aligned organizational strategy

8-46

• Must start with aligned organizational strategy• LSS fits as a Strategy Improvement Engine


8-47


• Evaluate objective targets, gaps to reach them


8-48


• Evaluate objective targets, gaps to reach them• ID initiatives to close gaps


8-49


• Evaluate objective targets, gaps to reach them• ID initiatives to close gaps• Those initiatives become LSS projects!


8-50


• Evaluate objective targets, gaps to reach them• ID initiatives to close gaps• Those initiatives become LSS projects

• Aligns commitment, resources, and effort against strategically-focused projects!


8-51

• The MHS is ahead of the rest of the DoD!


8-52

• The MHS is ahead of the rest of the DoD!• Strategy and objectives defined


8-53

• The MHS is ahead of the rest of the DoD!• Strategy and objectives defined • Data-driven decision-making is routine


8-54

• The MHS is ahead of the rest of the DoD!• Strategy and objectives defined • Data-driven decision-making is routine• Data-mining already part of our infrastructure


8-55

An Army Medicine example:at a high level…

linking Organizational Strategyto Performance Improvement

usingLean Six Sigma

and

Best Practice Transfer!

8-56

For more information go to: https://ke2.army.mil/bsc

- Promote, Sustain and Enhance Soldier Health- Train, Develop and Equip a Medical Force that Supports Full Spectrum Operations - Deliver Leading Edge Health Services to Our Warriors and Military Family to Optimize Outcomes

This has been a dynamic, living document since 2001

America’s Premier Medical Team Saving Lives, Fostering Healthy and Resilient PeopleARMY MEDICINE

Bringing Value…Inspiring TrustMaximize Value in Health Services

Effectively and efficiently provide the right care at the right time to

promote a healthy population and ready force.

Provide Global Operational Forces

Agile and adaptive medical teams ready to execute relevant,

responsive Health Services in any operational environment and in combination with any partnered

team.

Build the Team

A compelling place to serve and a preferred partner in leading joint interagency

health services.

Balance Innovation with Standardization

A culture of innovation which provides standardized solutions to support best

practices and optimal outcomes.

Optimize Communication and Knowledge

ManagementLeverage Communication to impart

knowledge and build meaningful, positive relationships.

Pat

ient

/Cus

tom

er/

Sta

keho

lder CS 5.0

Inspire Trust in Army

Medicine

CS 3.0 Responsive Battlefield

Medical Force

CS 2.0 Improved Healthy and

Protected Families, Beneficiaries and

Army Civilians

CS 1.0 Improved

Healthy and Protected Warriors

CS 6.0 Improved

Patient and Customer

Satisfaction

IP 1.0 Optimize Medical

Readiness

IP 8.0 Build Relationships and Enhance Partnerships

LG 2.0 Improve

Training and Development

IP 2.0 Improve

Information Systems

CS 4.0 Optimized Care and

Transition of Wounded, Ill, and Injured Warriors

IP 3.0 Implement

Best Practices

IP 9.0 Tell the Army Medicine

Story

LG 4.0 Improve

Knowledge Management

LG 1.0 Improve Recruiting and Retention of

AMEDD Personnel

Inte

rnal

Pro

cess

Lear

ning

and

G

row

th LG 3.0 Promote and Foster a

Culture of Innovation

IP 6.0 Improve Quality,

Outcome-Focused Care and Services

IP 5.0 Maximize Physical and Psychological

Health Promotion and Prevention

IP 7.0 Improve Access and Continuity of

Care

R 1.0 Optimize

Resources and Value

R 2.0 Optimize Lifecycle Management

of Facilities and IT Infrastructure

R 3.0 Maximize Human Capital

EN

DS

ME

AN

SW

AYS

Res

ourc

e

IP 10.0 Leverage Research,

Development and Acquisition

Feedback Adjusts

Resourcing D

ecisions

To deliver the Strategic

Processes...

That achieve

our Strategic

Ends

We marshal our

Resources…

And enable our

People…

IP 4.0Provide

Safe Patient Care

We align MEDCOM LSS projects to our

Organization’s Strategy

8-57

For more information go to: https://ke2.army.mil/bsc

- Promote, Sustain and Enhance Soldier Health- Train, Develop and Equip a Medical Force that Supports Full Spectrum Operations - Deliver Leading Edge Health Services to Our Warriors and Military Family to Optimize Outcomes

This has been a dynamic, living document since 2001

America’s Premier Medical Team Saving Lives, Fostering Healthy and Resilient PeopleARMY MEDICINE

Bringing Value…Inspiring TrustMaximize Value in Health Services

Effectively and efficiently provide the right care at the right time to

promote a healthy population and ready force.

Provide Global Operational Forces

Agile and adaptive medical teams ready to execute relevant,

responsive Health Services in any operational environment and in combination with any partnered

team.

Build the Team

A compelling place to serve and a preferred partner in leading joint interagency

health services.

Balance Innovation with Standardization

A culture of innovation which provides standardized solutions to support best

practices and optimal outcomes.

Optimize Communication and Knowledge

ManagementLeverage Communication to impart

knowledge and build meaningful, positive relationships.

Pat

ient

/Cus

tom

er/

Sta

keho

lder CS 5.0

Inspire Trust in Army

Medicine

CS 3.0 Responsive Battlefield

Medical Force

CS 2.0 Improved Healthy and

Protected Families, Beneficiaries and

Army Civilians

CS 1.0 Improved

Healthy and Protected Warriors

CS 6.0 Improved

Patient and Customer

Satisfaction

IP 1.0 Optimize Medical

Readiness

IP 8.0 Build Relationships and Enhance Partnerships

LG 2.0 Improve

Training and Development

IP 2.0 Improve

Information Systems

CS 4.0 Optimized Care and

Transition of Wounded, Ill, and Injured Warriors

IP 3.0 Implement

Best Practices

IP 9.0 Tell the Army Medicine

Story

LG 4.0 Improve

Knowledge Management

LG 1.0 Improve Recruiting and Retention of

AMEDD Personnel

Inte

rnal

Pro

cess

Lear

ning

and

G

row

th LG 3.0 Promote and Foster a

Culture of Innovation

IP 6.0 Improve Quality,

Outcome-Focused Care and Services

IP 5.0 Maximize Physical and Psychological

Health Promotion and Prevention

IP 7.0 Improve Access and Continuity of

Care

R 1.0 Optimize

Resources and Value

R 2.0 Optimize Lifecycle Management

of Facilities and IT Infrastructure

R 3.0 Maximize Human Capital

EN

DS

ME

AN

SW

AYS

Res

ourc

e

IP 10.0 Leverage Research,

Development and Acquisition

Feedback Adjusts

Resourcing D

ecisions

To deliver the Strategic

Processes...

That achieve

our Strategic

Ends

We marshal our

Resources…

And enable our

People…

IP 4.0Provide

Safe Patient Care

We recognize we have a performance gap in

Access to Care…

8-58

Value Stream #9: Improve Access & Continuity of CarePVC #1: Maximize Value in Health Services

• Patient Satisfaction

• Access to Care Standards (e.g., achieve acute care appt. within 24 hours)

• Support Staff to Primary Care Provider Utilization ratio

• Call Hold and Handle Times, Call Abandon Rate

• Care Appointment Availability

• Schedule Availability

• Facility Availability

• Call Volume

• # of Appts. Requested

• Type of Care Requested

• Staff Availability

• Facility Scheduling

• DOD Title 10 patients

• Non-Title 10 patients

Suppliers Inputs Process Outputs Customer

Customer Input Metrics Process Metrics Output Metrics

• Satisfied beneficiary• Accessible

appointments• Standardized, utilized

support staff• Optimized provider

productivity• Optimized referral

execution, delivery• Increased utilization of

on-line appointment system

• DOD Title 10 patients (e.g., Soldiers, retirees, families)

• Non-Title 10 patients (e.g., civilian emergencies, contractors, foreign officers and families, etc.)

• Customer Service

• Telephone Services

• Provider Support Staff Utilization

• Primary Care Exam Room Utilization

• Patient Appointing, Referral Mgt.

• TRICARE Online Appointment

• Patients

• DOD Healthcare Professionals

• IMCOM

• Need for Care (preventive, acute)

• Healthcare staff

• Facilities and infrastructure

High level process maps (SIPOCs) help us better focus

on the problem/s in our work…

8-59

• Patient Satisfaction

• Access to Care Standards (e.g., achieve acute care appt. within 24 hours)

• Support Staff to Primary Care Provider Utilization ratio

• Call Hold and Handle Times, Call Abandon Rate

• Care Appointment Availability

• Schedule Availability

• Facility Availability

• Call Volume

• # of Appts. Requested

• Type of Care Requested

• Staff Availability

• Facility Scheduling

• DOD Title 10 patients

• Non-Title 10 patients

Suppliers Inputs Process Outputs Customer

Customer Input Metrics Process Metrics Output Metrics

• Satisfied beneficiary• Accessible

appointments• Standardized, utilized

support staff• Optimized provider

productivity• Optimized referral

execution, delivery• Increased utilization of

on-line appointment system

• DOD Title 10 patients (e.g., Soldiers, retirees, families)

• Non-Title 10 patients (e.g., civilian emergencies, contractors, foreign officers and families, etc.)

• Customer Service

• Telephone Services

• Provider Support Staff Utilization

• Primary Care Exam Room Utilization

• Patient Appointing, Referral Mgt.

• TRICARE Online Appointment

• Patients

• DOD Healthcare Professionals

• IMCOM

• Need for Care (preventive, acute)

• Healthcare staff

• Facilities and infrastructure

…and we decided to start by improving the Telephone

Appointing Process

Value Stream #9: Improve Access & Continuity of CarePVC #1: Maximize Value in Health Services

8-60

LSS Project LD00373: Access to Care— Improve TelephoneAppointing Process at Carl R. Darnall Army Medical Center

Documented in PowerSteering!

8-61

Overall average hold time reduced to 33 seconds Overall call abandon rate reduced: 3% Peak time call abandon rate reduced: 22% Call volume reduced 20% due to less call backs Calls handled increased from 4700 to 7300 / week Agent training time reduced from 6 weeks to 4 weeks Agent turnover reduced

• REPLICATION / WAY-AHEAD• RESULTS / BENEFITS

Agent scheduling changes to handle peak times Agent training, area setup, shift change by SOP Phone menu tree and call handling improved Future ACD design requirements specified

• IMPROVEMENTS• PROBLEM / BASELINE / GOAL

BEFORE AFTER

Hol

d Ti

me

PROBLEM STATEMENTThe telephone appointing process at CRDAMC has observed low patient satisfaction scores and long process hold times. Over the last six months, it takes an average of 3:14 minutes to answer customer calls to make an appointment. This has led to numerous customer complaints which have led to lower patient satisfaction scores for telephone appointing services.

BASELINE

Decrease process hold time to less than 90 seconds per call Decrease overall abandoned call rate to less than 10% Decrease peak time call abandon rate to less than 25%

Army’s largest call center: 10,000+ calls a week Low customer satisfaction: 68% Average wait time: 3:14 minutes Calls answered under 90 seconds: 65% Overall call abandon rate: 26%; Peak time: 49%

GOAL

Performance Action Plan Completed; Access to Care Initiative 17.2

Adjust MEDCOM BSC telephone appting standards NLT 20 Apr 07

Establish CMS metric for telephone appting NLT 1 May 07 Publish MEDCOM Telephone Appting Policy NLT 1 May 07 Replicate LSS projects across MEDCOM MTFs NLT Dec 08

the initial project was conducted at Fort Hood’s

Carl R. Darnall Army Medical Center (CRDAMC)…

Project Summary: Carl R. Darnall AMC Telephone Appointing Mark Hernandez – Black Belt Candidate

8-62





BEFORE AFTER

Hol

d Ti

me


BASELINE



GOAL




…high call volume, low patient satisfaction, long process cycle

time, high variation…


8-63





BEFORE AFTER

Hol

d Ti

me


BASELINE



GOAL




…the project sought to decrease process cycle time

and call abandon rate to improve patient satisfaction…


8-64





BEFORE AFTER

Hol

d Ti

me


BASELINE



GOAL




WOW!


8-65





BEFORE AFTER

Hol

d Ti

me


BASELINE



GOAL




6-Fold Improvement


8-66





BEFORE AFTER

Hol

d Ti

me


BASELINE



GOAL




10-Fold Improvement


8-67





BEFORE AFTER

Hol

d Ti

me


BASELINE



GOAL




>2-Fold Improvement


8-68





BEFORE AFTER

Hol

d Ti

me


BASELINE



GOAL


Adjust MEDCOM BSC telephone appting standards Establish CMS metric for telephone Publish MEDCOM Telephone Appting Policy NLT 1 May 08 Replicate LSS projects across MEDCOM MTFs NLT Jun 09

Disciplined, Corporate Action to Harvest and

Replicate Across MEDCOM


8-69

Not Only Administrative ProcessesERMC/LRMC: Streamlining the Landstuhl Regional Medical Center (LRMC) Crash Cart System (LD24008), Master Black Belt Richard Rhodes / Black Belt Candidate MAJ Daniel Coulter• Increase the Crash Cart defect-free rate from 65% to 100% • Reduced 13 Crash Carts from facility

SRMC/BAMC: Group of nine independent projects focused on OR optimization• Reduced the housekeeping turn-over time from 50.48 to 16.62 minutes• Reduced the Sterile Products Process from 56 hours to 16 hours• Improved the Preadmission process from 93 min to 63 min• Reduced Total Logistics Response Time-Maintenance (TLRT-M) from 32 to 8 days• Reduced the Cholecystectomy procedures averaged 132 min with a standard

deviation (SD) of 44.62 min to 87 min with a SD of 16.49 min with 100% of procedures within the 119 min standard.

• Improved the documentation of anesthesia blocks in S3 from 23% to 89%• Reduced complexity and errors in patient information from 100% to 6.32%

8-70

• Project Sponsors/Leadership play critical roles…their training is imperative

Lessons Learned

8-71

• Project Sponsors play critical roles…their training is imperative

• Project ID, Selection, and Chartering upfront…then worry about belt selection/training

Lessons Learned

8-72



• Best and brightest leaders selected for belts…if it doesn’t hurt, you’ve probably selected poorly

Lessons Learned

8-73




• Belt candidates’ time dedicated 100% to LSS…during didactics & project execution part of trng

Lessons Learned

8-74




• Belt candidates’ time dedicated 100% to LSS…during didactics & project execution part of trng

• Coaching critical to project execution…must have MBB/BB mentors engaged

Lessons Learned

8-75

Points of Contact• LCDR John Gardner, USN, BUMED, M5 Office of Strategy Management

703.681.3906 [email protected]• Donna Whittaker/Angela Koelsch, Strategy Mgmt, G8/9, USAMEDCOM/OTSG

703.681.4754 [email protected]• Beth Kohsin, USAF, Director of Transformation, AFMOA/CCO

210.395.9010 [email protected]

mailto:[email protected]



8-76

Session 16: Continuous Performance Improvement Through Lean Six Sigma in the Military Health System

Gaston M. Randolph, Jr.Director, Strategy ManagementUS Army Medical Command/Office of The Surgeon [email protected]: 703.681.3015

8-77

Obtaining CME/CE credit

• If you would like to receive continuing education credit for this activity, please visit:

http://medxellence.cds.pesgce.com

Download - Continuous Performance Improvement Through …medxellence.pesgce.com/presentation_pdf/06-02-2017_1204pmS17 LSS...Continuous Performance Improvement Through Lean ... • Introduce Lean

Top Related