Corporate Governance - Companies Act Prospective.
N K JainB.Sc., LLB.,DCL,FCS,FCPS
Corporate Advisor Partner, Global FinServe LLP
Member , ASSOCHAM National Council for Corporate Affairs & CSRFormer Council Member and Secretary & CEO, ICSI
Cell: 09818348811Landline: 0120 - 4263965
E-mail: [email protected] January, 2016
Why Corporate Governance ? Illustrious business enterprises which
witnessed spectacular growth in boom time became disastrous failures later due to:-
Mismanagement; Lack of effective internal controls and
financial reporting; Poor governance standards.
[email protected] 9818348811 2
England Catches Up Polly Peck Bank of Credit and Commerce International British & Commonwealth Robert Maxwell’s Mirror Group International
[email protected] 9818348811 4
Series of Indian Scams
Harshad Mehta’s securities scam Preferential Allotment scam Vanishing Companies scam Plantation companies scam Non-banking finance companies scam Mutual fund scam Global Trust Bank scam Satyam scam
[email protected] 9818348811 5
Why Corporate Governance ? The society, shareholders, MFs and large
institutional investors insisted that corporates adopt better governance practices.
It led to formation of several committees to study the issue and make recommendations, codes, guidelines on CG.
The society’s response to these frauds was reflected in the legislative & regulatory changes made by governments.
[email protected] 9818348811 6
CG Developments in India CII’s Desirable CG Code, 1998 Kumar Mangalam Birla Committee, 2000 Task Force on Corporate Excellence, 2000 Naresh Chandra Committee, 2002 Narayan Murthy Committee, 2003 Dr. J J Irani Expert Committee, 2005 CG Voluntary Guidelines, 2009
[email protected] 9818348811 7
CG Developments in India Guidelines issued by the Department of
Public Enterprises for Central Public Sector Undertakings, 2010
Adi Godrej Committee Report, 2012 The Companies Act, 2013 Revised Clause 49 of the Listing Agreement
by SEBI, 2014 SEBI Listing Regulations, 2015
[email protected] 9818348811 8
Corporate Governance Issues Separation of Ownership from Management: Promoters/Shareholders should exercise
their ownership rights in the general meetings of the company and ought not to throw their weight in the Board meetings.
Boards should be allowed to function and decide with complete freedom what is good for the company and its various stakeholders.
[email protected] 9818348811 9
Corporate Governance IssuesDistinguishing the roles of board and management: The business of a company is to be managed ‘by or under the direction of’ the board. The responsibility of managing the business is delegated by the board to the CEO, who in turn delegates the responsibility to other senior executives. Thus, the board occupies a key position between shareholders (owners) and company’s management.
[email protected] 9818348811 10
Role of the Board
Establish Vision and Mission. Strategic direction, policy and advice. Overseeing implementation of its policies. Appointment & evaluating performance of
CEO and senior management staff. Ensuring stakeholder relationships. Risk mitigation. Procuring resources.
[email protected] 9818348811 11
Strategic Board for better CG Optimum size: The optimum board size will
result in greater involvement of directors which will lead to more cohesive functioning and faster decisions.
Independence: Strategic board should have less insiders and more outsiders to maintain independence /objectivity in decision making.
Information: Timely, accurate and intelligent information to board enhances its efficiency and effectiveness.
[email protected] 9818348811 12
Strategic Board for better CG
Diversity: The board should be composed of directors with varied expertise, experience & diverse professional qualifications and also of people with different ethnic and cultural backgrounds in tune with rapid globalisation of businesses.
Vision: The board should have a longer vision and broader responsibility than those of CEO and top management.
[email protected] 9818348811 13
Duties of Directors Sec.166 ..act in accordance with articles of company; ..act in good faith to promote company’s
objects in interest of company, employees, shareholders, community & environment;
..exercise his duties with due and reasonable care, skill and diligence…;
.not to involve in conflict of interest with comp .not to achieve any undue gain or advantage; ..not to assign his office..
[email protected] 9818348811 14
In re Caremark International, Inc.
The company provides health care services and products to patients referred to them by a physician. Since the business is based on referrals, companies such as Caremark compensate physicians.
A federal law, the Anti-Referral Payments Law (”ARPL”) prevents such a system.
In 1994, Caremark was indicted for violating the ARPL.
[email protected] 9818348811 15
In re Caremark International, Inc.
The court held that a board’s sustained and systematic failure to monitor its corporation’s compliance with governing law would be evidence of an absence of good faith.
It was held that a lack of good faith could be demonstrated by a board’s failure to undertake a pre-existing duty—the statutory duty to monitor.
[email protected] 9818348811 16
Union Carbide India Ltd.-Bhopal Gas Case Leak of poisonous gas from the plant on the
night of December 2–3, 1984 made its way in and around the shantytowns located near plant at Bhopal and destroyed & damaged thousands of lives, vegetation, etc.
The prosecution charged the company and its directors with not heeding the feedback on inadequate safety norms and other maintenance lapses.
[email protected] 9818348811 17
Union Carbide India Ltd.-Bhopal Gas Case The court has held Keshub Mahindra guilty &
sentenced him to 2 years of imprisonment along with seven other accused. He attended only a few meetings in a year and took only macro view of the company’s developments.
A non-vigilant act of non-executive chairman, accounted for death of thousands.
“Ignorance” of the system by directors of the company is unacceptable. Role of directors in this case is questionable.
[email protected] 9818348811 18
The Volkswagen emissions scandal Olaf Lies, a Volkswagen board director who
represents the state of Lower Saxony, which has a controlling stake in the carmaker, has said some staff acted criminally in cheating emissions tests.
CEO has quit after the firm admitted diesel cars were designed to cheat in tests.
[email protected] 9818348811 19
The Volkswagen emissions scandal Lies told BBC “We only found out about the
problems in the last board meeting... So we need to find out why the board wasn’t informed earlier.. when they were known about over a year ago in the United States.”
Fines in the US alone could be about $12bn. Huge damage has been done as millions of
people have lost their faith in VW,” said Lies.
[email protected] 9818348811 20
The Volkswagen emissions scandal
VW has admitted that 11m diesel cars worldwide have been fitted with a defeat device. VW has put aside €6.5bn (£4.8bn) to meet the costs of recalling the cars but also faces the threat of fines and legal action from shareholders and customers.
[email protected] 9818348811 21
Separation of the roles of Chairperson & CEO Chairperson leads the board. CEO leads the senior management team The board evaluates the performance of
senior executives including the CEO. Combining the role of both the CEO and the
Chairman removes an important check on senior management’s activities.
The Chairman should be an ID to provide the appropriate counterbalance and to check the power of the CEO.
[email protected] 9818348811 22
Separation of the roles of Chairperson & CEO Sec.203 provides that an individual shall not
be appointed or re-appointed as Chairperson as well MD or CEO of the company at the same time after the date of commencement of the Act unless the:-
a. article of the company provide otherwise; orb. company does not carry multiple businesses Prescribed classes of companies engaged in
multiple businesses with CEO for each such business may be exempted by Govt.
[email protected] 9818348811 23
Composition of Board Sec. 149 Minimum Number of Directors: a. Public Company : 3 directors b. Private Company : 2 directors c. One Person Company : 1 director Maximum number of directors restricted to 15 Maximum directorships: 20 companies
including 10 directorships in public companies
Listed public company to have at least 1/3rd of total directors as IDs.
[email protected] 9818348811 24
[email protected] 9818348811 25
Number of IDs in other Companies: Rule 4
Following companies shall have at least two directors as IDs:-
Public companies having:i. paid up share capital of 10 cr. +; or₹ii. turnover of 100 cr. +; or ₹iii. in aggregate, outstanding loans, debentures and
deposits exceeding 50 cr.₹ iv. Where a company ceases to fulfil any of three conditions
for 3 consecutive years, it shall not be required to comply with this requirement
Maximum tenure of Independent Directors
For a term up to 5 consecutive years & shall be eligible for reappointment for another term of up to 5 consecutive years on passing of a special resolution by the company.
Any tenure of an ID on the date of commencement of the Act not to be counted.
[email protected] 9818348811 26
Cooling period for appointment of an ID
An independent director, who completes his term shall be eligible for appointment as independent director in the company only after the expiration of 3 years of ceasing to be an independent director in the company.
[email protected] 9818348811 27
[email protected] 9818348811 28
ID- Rewards IDs shall be entitled to receive:- sitting fee for attending meetings of the Board
or Committees thereof or for any other purpose as may be decided by the Board;
reimbursement of expenses for participation in such meetings; and
profit related commission as may be approved by the members.
IDs are not entitled to stock option.
Separate Meetings of the Independent Directors IDs shall hold at least one meeting in a year,
without non-IDs and management. IDs, in the meeting shall, review/assess: performance of non-IDs & Board as a whole; performance of the Chairperson, taking into
account the views of EDs and non-EDs; quality, quantity and timeliness of flow of
information between management & Board that is necessary for the Board effectiveness.
[email protected] 9818348811 29
Familiarisation Programme for Independent Directors Familiarise IDs with the company, their roles,
rights, responsibilities, nature of industry, business model of the company etc.
Details of such familiarisation programmes shall be disclosed on the company's website and a web link shall also be given in the Annual Report.
[email protected] 9818348811 30
Woman DirectorSec.149(1)
The following companies shall appoint at least one WD :-
i. every listed company;ii. every other public company having: - paid-up share capital of 100 crs or more; or ₹ turnover of 300 crs or more. ₹
[email protected] 9818348811 31
Woman Director
Women are responsible for more than 75 percent of all buying decisions.
A diverse board leads to a smarter company. Savvy women on board help to find business
solutions encompassing new perspectives from the female population.
Gender diversity at the top accounts for 36% better stock price growth and 46% better return on equity.
[email protected] 9818348811 32
Vacation of Office of Director Sec. 167(1),(3)
The office of a director shall become vacant in case he absents himself from all the board meetings held during a period of 12 months with or without seeking leave of absence of the Board.
Key Managerial Personnel Sec. 203 & Rule 8
Board of every listed company and every other public company having a paid-up share capital of 10 crs or more ₹ shall appoint the following whole time KMPs :-
Managing Director or Chief Executive Officer or Manager and in their absence a Whole Time Director;
a Company Secretary; and a Chief Financial Officer.
[email protected] 9818348811 34
National Financial Reporting Authority ( NFRA) - Sec. 132 The CG may constitute a NFRA to provide for matters
relating to accounting/auditing standards which shall:-a) make recommendations to CG on the formulation of
accounting and auditing policies and standards for adoption by companies and their auditors;
b) monitor and enforce compliance with accounting and auditing standards;
c) oversee the quality of service of professionals;d) perform such others functions as may be prescribed.
[This section not yet notified]
[email protected] 9818348811 35
National Financial Reporting Authority ( NFRA) - Sec. 132 NFRA shall have power to investigate into
matters of professional or other misconduct committed by any member or firm of CAs.
Where professional or other misconduct is proved, NFRA shall have the power to make order for imposing penalty of not less than
10 lac but which may extend to 10 times of ₹the fees received in case of firms. [This section not yet notified]
[email protected] 9818348811 36
Rotation of Auditors Sec. 139 & Rule 6 No listed company or prescribed classes of
companies, excluding small and one person companies, shall appoint/ re-appoint:-
i. an individual as an auditor for more than 1 term of 5 consecutive years; and
ii. an audit firm as an auditor for more than 2 terms of 5 consecutive years.
Period for which individual/firm has been auditor prior to commencement of the Act shall be taken into account for calculating period of 5/10 years.
[email protected] 9818348811 37
Rotation of Auditors- Class of Companies Rule 5a. Listed company;b. Unlisted public companies having paid up
share capital of 10 crs or more;₹c. Private limited companies having paid up
share capital of 20 crs or more;₹d. Companies having paid up share capital of
below threshold limit mentioned in (b) & (c) above, but having public borrowings from FIs, banks or public deposits of 50 crs or ^₹
[email protected] 9818348811 38
Rotation of Auditors Sec.139 Rule 6 An auditor/ audit firm which has completed its
term shall not be eligible for re-appointment as an auditor in same company for 5 years.
A period of 3 years from the commencement of the Act has been provided to every company existing on or before such commencement to comply with this provision.
[email protected] 9818348811 39
Auditor not to render certain services - Sec. 144
An Auditor appointed under the new law shall provide to the company only such services as are approved by the BOD or the Audit Committee but which shall not include any of the following services:-
Accounting and book keeping services; Internal audit; Design & implementation of any financial
information system;[email protected] 9818348811 40
Auditor not to render certain services - Sec. 144 Actuarial services; Investment advisory and banking services; Outsourced financial services; and Management services.
[email protected] 9818348811 41
[email protected] 9818348811 42
Secretarial Audit Sec. 204 & Rule 9 Every listed and every public company
having a paid-up share capital of 50 crs or ₹more or turnover of 250 crs or more shall ₹annex with its Board’s Report, a Secretarial Audit Report given by a PCS.
The BOD in its report shall explain in full any qualification or observation or other remarks made by the PCS in his report.
Secretarial Audit Sec. 143(12),(15) & 204 If a PCS conducting SA, has reason to
believe that an offence involving fraud is being or has been committed against the company by its officers/employees, he shall immediately report the matter to the Central Government.
If a PCS does not comply with the above provision, he shall be punishable with fine of minimum 1 lac and may extend to 25 lac₹ ₹ .
[email protected] 9818348811 43
Internal Audit- Companies to appoint IA-Sec.138a) Every listed company;b) Every unlisted public company having,
during the preceding financial year, :-i. paid up share capital of 50 crs or more; or₹ii. turnover of 200 crs or more; or₹iii. outstanding loan or borrowing from banks or
public FIs exceeding 100 crs or more ; or₹iv. outstanding deposits of 25 crs or more. ₹
[email protected] 9818348811 44
Internal Audit-Class of Companies to appoint IA
c) Every private company having:-i. turnover of 200 crs or more during the ₹
preceding financial year; orii. outstanding loans or borrowing from banks
or public FIs exceeding 100 crs or more at ₹any point of time during the preceding FY ;
Statutory or Cost Auditor can not be the Internal Auditor
[email protected] 9818348811 45
Audit Committee Sec.177 & Rule 6 Class of companies to constitute AC: Every listed company; All public companies: with a paid up capital of 10 crs or more;₹ having turnover of 100 crs or more;₹ having in aggregate, outstanding loans or
borrowings or debentures or deposits exceeding 50 crs or more.₹
[email protected] 9818348811 46
Audit Committee A qualified & independent AC shall be set up. AC shall have minimum 3 directors as
members with at least 2/3rd IDs. All members of AC shall be financially literate At least 1 member shall have accounting or
related financial management expertise; Chairman of the AC shall be an ID and shall
be present at AGM to answer shareholder queries.
[email protected] 9818348811 47
Terms of Reference Appointment of Auditors Monitor Auditor’s independence Effectiveness of Audit process Examination of FSs/audit report Approval of Related Party Transactions Scrutiny of inter-corporate loans Valuation of undertakings/assets of company Monitoring end use of funds raised through
public [email protected] 9818348811 48
Nomination & Remuneration Committee- Sec.178 Composition: at least 3 NEDs out of which
not less than ½ shall be IDs. Chairperson of the company may be a
member but shall not chair the NRC. The NRC shall formulate and recommend to
Board a policy, relating to remuneration for the Directors/KMPs/other employees which shall be disclosed in the Board’s Report.
The Chairman of NRC shall attend General Meetings of the company.
[email protected] 9818348811 49
Board Evaluation NRC shall carry out evaluation of every
director’s performance. IDs in their separate meetings shall review
the performance of non-IDs, the Chairman of the Board and the Board as a whole.
The performance evaluation of IDs shall be done by the entire Board, excluding the director being evaluated.
Report of performance evaluation shall determine extension of term of appointment.
[email protected] 9818348811 50
[email protected] 9818348811 51
Functions of Company Secretary Sec. 205 The functions of a CS shall include:-a. To report to the Board about compliance
with the provisions of the Act/ Rules and other laws applicable to the company;
b. To ensure that the company complies with the applicable secretarial standards;
c. To discharge such other duties as may be prescribed.
Duties of Company Secretary1. To provide such guidance to the directors,
as they may require, about their responsibilities, duties and powers;
2. To assist the Board in the conduct of the affairs of the company;
3. To assist and advise the Board in ensuring good corporate governance;
[email protected] 9818348811 52
[email protected] 9818348811 53
Secretarial Standards Sec. 118(10) Every company shall observe Secretarial
Standards with respect to General and Board meetings specified by ICSI and approved by the Central Government.
Secretarial Standard-1 on Board Meetings and Secretarial Standard-2 on General Meetings have come into force wef. 1st July, 2015.
Vigil Mechanism Sec. 177(9) & Rule 7 Following classes of companies shall
establish a vigil mechanism :-i. Every listed company;ii. Companies which accept deposits from the
public; andiii. Companies which have borrowed money
from banks and public financial institutions in excess of 50 crs.₹
[email protected] 9818348811 54
Vigil Mechanism Sec. 177 Directors and employees to report concerns
about unethical behaviour, fraud or violation of the company’s code of conduct or ethics policy
Adequate safeguards shall be provided against victimisation of employees/directors.
Suitable action against repeated frivolous complaints including reprimand.
[email protected] 9818348811 55
Related Party Transactions-Sec.188 Approval of the Audit Committee Consent of the Board by a resolution at a
meeting of the Board Prior approval of the company by a resolution
[email protected] 9818348811 56
Related Party Transactions Exceptions:A. Transactions entered into by the company in
its ordinary course of business and on an arm’s length basis.
B. Transactions between:- two government companies; a holding company and its wholly owned
subsidiary whose accounts are consolidated and placed before shareholders at GBM for approval
[email protected] 9818348811 57
Non cash transactions involving directors Sec. 192
A company shall not enter into any arrangement by which a director of the company or of its holding company or any person connected with him can acquire company’s assets for consideration other than cash & vice versa without the approval of company in GBM.
Where the director or connected person is a director of its holding company, then resolution from holding company will also be required.
[email protected] 9818348811 58
Prohibition on Forward Dealings Sec.194 Sec.194(1) imposes a prohibition on forward
dealings in securities of the company, or in its holding, subsidiary or associate company by any director or KMP of a company.
A director/KMP shall be liable to surrender the securities acquired in contravention of Sec, 194(1) which shall continue to remain in the name of the transferor.
Punishment: Imprisonment up to 2 years or fine of 1lac to 5 lac or with both. ₹ ₹
[email protected] 9818348811 59
By: N K Jain 60
No person including any director or KMP of a company shall enter into insider trading in respect of securities of the company.
Punishment for contravention: Imprisonment up to 5 years or with fine of 5 ₹lac to 25 crs₹ or 3 times the amount of profit made out of insider trading, whichever is higher or with both.
Prohibition on Insider Trading Sec.195
Rajat Gupta fined $13.9 million in insider trading case Rajat Gupta, convicted of insider trading has
been fined $13.9 million to settle related civil charges of feeding inside information to his friend Raj Rajaratnam.
Gupta was sentenced to two years in prison for passing confidential information gained from his position as a Goldman Sachs director to Raj Rajaratnam, founder of the Galleon group of 14 hedge funds.
[email protected] 9818348811 61
[email protected] 9818348811 62
Class Action Sec. 245 Class action is a collective action filed by the
plaintiff on behalf of a class of shareholders or users of goods or services or in relation to matters of public interest, seeking collective remedy.
Requisite number of members or depositors may file an application before NCLT, if they are of the opinion, that the management or conduct of the affairs of the company are being conducted in a manner prejudicial to the interest of the company or its members or depositors.
[email protected] 9818348811 63
Class Action Sec. 245 The application for class action may claim
damages or compensation or demand any other suitable action from :-
i. the company or its directors;ii. the auditor including audit firm of the co;iii. any expert or advisor or consultant or any
other person for any incorrect or misleading statement made to the company etc.
Disclosures Additional disclosures in:- Prospectus u/s 26 & Annual Return u/s 92; Promoters’ Stake Changes u/s 93; Statement with AGM Notice u/s 102; Report on AGM u/s 121; Board’s Report and DRS u/s 134; Failure to spend requisite amount on CSR; RPTs u/s 188; Merger & Amalgamation u/s 232.
[email protected] 98 18348811 64
E-Governance for various company processes Maintenance and inspection of documents in
electronic form; Option of keeping of books of accounts in
electronic form; Financial statements to be placed on
company's website; Holding of board meetings through video
conferencing/other electronic mode; Voting through electronic means etc.
[email protected] 9818348811 65
E-Governance Online services would reduce the need for
hard copy paper forms and have a positive impact on the environment.
It will substantially improve the standards of disclosure and transparency, involve more and more stakeholders in the company processes and provide real time information and service to the shareholders and other stakeholders.
[email protected] 9818348811 66
McKINSEY Survey on CG There has been a continuing debate among
those who hold divergent positions on CG practices whether there is any quantifiable connection between good CG and the market valuation of the company. McKinsey, carried out a survey of 188 companies from India, Malaysia, Mexico, South Korea, Taiwan and Turkey to determine the correlation between good CG and market valuation of company.
[email protected] 9818348811 67
McKINSEY Survey on CG The results of the survey pointed out to a
positive correlation between the two and brought out that good CG increases market valuation of the company in following ways:-
Increases financial performance; Transparency of dealings, thereby reducing
the risk that boards will serve their own self interest;
Increasing investor confidence.
[email protected] 9818348811 68
McKINSEY Survey on CG-Findings
Investors are willing to pay premium of as much as 28% for share of a well managed and well governed company.
Studies of 6 emerging markets show that investors world over look for high standards of good governance.
[email protected] 9818348811 69
Other Advantages of Good CG Easy/ cost effective finance from Banks & FIs Better price for their products & services Attract and retain talent Global market access Confidence of governments & regulators Brand equity Reputation & Credibility Sustainability
[email protected] 9818348811 70
THANK YOUN K Jain
B.Sc, LLB.,DCL,FCS,FCPS Corporate Advisor
Managing Partner, Global FinServe LLPMember , ASSOCHAM National Council for Corporate Affairs & CSR
Former Council Member and Secretary & CEO, ICSI
Cell: 09818348811Landline: 0120 - 4263965
E-mail: [email protected]