![Page 1: Deductive and Inductive Arguments - OLDHAM'S HOUSE](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022020702/61f9daac26528b2a2d312db0/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Deductive and Inductive
Arguments
Monday, January 9, 2012
![Page 2: Deductive and Inductive Arguments - OLDHAM'S HOUSE](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022020702/61f9daac26528b2a2d312db0/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Deduction and Induction
• Arguments can be broken down into two categories:
• Deductive = necessity
• Inductive = probability
Monday, January 9, 2012
![Page 3: Deductive and Inductive Arguments - OLDHAM'S HOUSE](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022020702/61f9daac26528b2a2d312db0/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Deductive
• In a deductive argument it is claimed that the premises provide necessary support for the conclusion
• 2 + 2 = 4 - necessary
• Indicator words: necessarily, certainly, absolutely, definitely
• Arguments based on laws, rules, or widely held principles
Monday, January 9, 2012
![Page 4: Deductive and Inductive Arguments - OLDHAM'S HOUSE](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022020702/61f9daac26528b2a2d312db0/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Inductive
• In an inductive argument it is claimed that the premises provide probable support for the conclusion
• It is likely the sun will rise again tomorrow
• Indicator words: probably, plausible, likely, reasonable to conclude
• Arguments based on experience and observation
Monday, January 9, 2012
![Page 5: Deductive and Inductive Arguments - OLDHAM'S HOUSE](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022020702/61f9daac26528b2a2d312db0/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
All bats are mammals.All mammals are warm-blooded.So, all bats are warm-blooded.
Is the argument above deductive or inductive?
Monday, January 9, 2012
![Page 6: Deductive and Inductive Arguments - OLDHAM'S HOUSE](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022020702/61f9daac26528b2a2d312db0/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
All bats are mammals.All mammals are warm-blooded.So, all bats are warm-blooded.
If the premises are true, the conclusion,
logically, must also be true.
Deductive.
Monday, January 9, 2012
![Page 7: Deductive and Inductive Arguments - OLDHAM'S HOUSE](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022020702/61f9daac26528b2a2d312db0/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Tess: Are there any good Italian restaurants in town? Don: Yeah, Luigi's is pretty good. I've had their Neapolitan rigatoni, their lasagne col pesto, and their mushroom ravioli. I don't think you can go wrong with any of their pasta dishes.
Based on what you've learned, is this argument deductive or inductive? How can you tell?
Monday, January 9, 2012
![Page 8: Deductive and Inductive Arguments - OLDHAM'S HOUSE](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022020702/61f9daac26528b2a2d312db0/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Don: Yeah, Luigi's is pretty good. I've had their Neapolitan rigatoni, their lasagne col pesto, and their mushroom ravioli. I don't think you can go wrong with any of their pasta dishes.
The argument is an inductive generalization, which is a common pattern of inductive reasoning. Also, the conclusion does not follow with strict necessity from the premises.
Inductive.
Monday, January 9, 2012
![Page 9: Deductive and Inductive Arguments - OLDHAM'S HOUSE](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022020702/61f9daac26528b2a2d312db0/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
I wonder if I have enough cash to buy my psychology textbook as well as my biology and history textbooks. Let's see, I have $200. My biology textbook costs $65 and my history textbook costs $52. My psychology textbook costs $60. With taxes, that should come to about $190. Yep, I have enough.
Is this argument deductive or inductive? How can you tell?
Monday, January 9, 2012
![Page 10: Deductive and Inductive Arguments - OLDHAM'S HOUSE](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022020702/61f9daac26528b2a2d312db0/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
I wonder if I have enough cash to buy my psychology textbook as well as my biology and history textbooks. Let's see, I have $200. My biology textbook costs $65 and my history textbook costs $52. My psychology textbook costs $60. With taxes, that should come to about $190. Yep, I have enough.
This argument is an argument based on mathematics, which is a common pattern of deductive reasoning. Plus, the conclusion follows necessarily from the premises.
Deductive.
Monday, January 9, 2012
![Page 11: Deductive and Inductive Arguments - OLDHAM'S HOUSE](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022020702/61f9daac26528b2a2d312db0/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Mother: Don't give Billy that brownie. It contains walnuts, and I think Billy is allergic to walnuts. Last week he ate some oatmeal cookies with walnuts and he broke out in a severe rash. Father: Billy isn't allergic to walnuts. Don't you remember he ate some walnut fudge ice cream at Melissa's birthday party last spring? He didn't have any allergic reaction then.
Is the father's argument deductive or inductive? How can you tell?
Monday, January 9, 2012
![Page 12: Deductive and Inductive Arguments - OLDHAM'S HOUSE](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022020702/61f9daac26528b2a2d312db0/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Mother: Don't give Billy that brownie. It contains walnuts, and I think Billy is allergic to walnuts. Last week he ate some oatmeal cookies with walnuts, and he broke out in a severe rash. Father: Billy isn't allergic to walnuts. Don't you remember he ate some walnut fudge ice cream at Melissa's birthday party last spring? He didn't have any allergic reaction then.
The father's argument is a causal argument, which is a common pattern of inductive reasoning. Also, the conclusion does not follow necessarily from the premises. (Billy might have developed an allergic reaction to walnuts since last spring.)
Inductive.
Monday, January 9, 2012
![Page 13: Deductive and Inductive Arguments - OLDHAM'S HOUSE](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022020702/61f9daac26528b2a2d312db0/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
John is an agnostic. It follows that he doesn't believe in God.
Is this argument deductive or inductive? How can you tell?
Monday, January 9, 2012
![Page 14: Deductive and Inductive Arguments - OLDHAM'S HOUSE](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022020702/61f9daac26528b2a2d312db0/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
John is an agnostic. It necessarily follows that he doesn't believe in God.
This argument is an argument by definition, which is a common pattern of deductive inference. Also, the phrase "it necessarily follows that" is a deduction indicator phrase. Also, the conclusion follows from the premises.
Deductive.
Monday, January 9, 2012
![Page 15: Deductive and Inductive Arguments - OLDHAM'S HOUSE](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022020702/61f9daac26528b2a2d312db0/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Larry: Do you think Representative Porkmeister will be re-elected? Norman: I doubt it. Porkmeister's district has become more conservative in recent years. Porkmeister is a liberal Democrat, and 63% of the registered voters in his district are now Republicans.
Is this argument deductive or inductive? How can you tell?
Monday, January 9, 2012
![Page 16: Deductive and Inductive Arguments - OLDHAM'S HOUSE](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022020702/61f9daac26528b2a2d312db0/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Larry: Do you think Representative Porkmeister will be re-elected? Norman: I doubt it. Porkmeister's district has become more conservative in recent years. Porkmeister is a liberal Democrat, and 63% of the registered voters in his district are now Republicans.
This argument is both a statistical argument and a predictive argument, which are two common patterns of inductive reasoning. Also, the conclusion does not follow necessarily from the premises.
Inductive.
Monday, January 9, 2012
![Page 17: Deductive and Inductive Arguments - OLDHAM'S HOUSE](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022020702/61f9daac26528b2a2d312db0/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
If Buster walked to the game, then he didn't drive to the game. Buster didn't drive to the game. Therefore, Buster walked to the game.
Is this argument deductive or inductive? How can you tell?
Monday, January 9, 2012
![Page 18: Deductive and Inductive Arguments - OLDHAM'S HOUSE](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022020702/61f9daac26528b2a2d312db0/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
If Buster walked to the game, then he didn't drive to the game. Buster didn't drive to the game. Therefore, Buster walked to the game.
Note, however, that the conclusion does not follow logically from the premises. (Maybe Buster rode his bike to the game, for example.)
This argument is a hypothetical syllogism, which is a common pattern of deductive reasoning.
Deductive.
Monday, January 9, 2012
![Page 19: Deductive and Inductive Arguments - OLDHAM'S HOUSE](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022020702/61f9daac26528b2a2d312db0/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Validity, Truth, Soundness, Cogency
19
Monday, January 9, 2012
![Page 20: Deductive and Inductive Arguments - OLDHAM'S HOUSE](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022020702/61f9daac26528b2a2d312db0/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Overview• Deductive arguments
– Valid versus invalid– Soundness
• Inductive arguments– Strong versus weak– Cogency
20
Monday, January 9, 2012
![Page 21: Deductive and Inductive Arguments - OLDHAM'S HOUSE](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022020702/61f9daac26528b2a2d312db0/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Traits of deductive arguments
• Validity• A deductive argument is an argument where it’s impossible
to have true premises and a false conclusion.• This is called a valid deductive argument.• An invalid deductive argument is one where it is possible
to have true premises and a false conclusion. The conclusion doesn’t follow from the premises, even though it claims to do so.
21
Monday, January 9, 2012
![Page 22: Deductive and Inductive Arguments - OLDHAM'S HOUSE](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022020702/61f9daac26528b2a2d312db0/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Testing for validity
• Assume its premises are true (whether they are or not), and see if the conclusion follows forth from it falsely. If it does, then the argument is invalid. If not, then it passes the test and is valid.
Example:• “All television networks are media companies. (True)• NBC is a television network. (True)• Therefore, NBC is a media company” (True)
22
Monday, January 9, 2012
![Page 23: Deductive and Inductive Arguments - OLDHAM'S HOUSE](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022020702/61f9daac26528b2a2d312db0/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
• “All automakers are computer manufacturers. (False, but assumed true)
• United Airlines is an automaker. (False, but assumed true)
• Therefore, United Airlines is a computer manufacturer” (True, if the premises are true)
23
Monday, January 9, 2012
![Page 24: Deductive and Inductive Arguments - OLDHAM'S HOUSE](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022020702/61f9daac26528b2a2d312db0/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
• “All banks are financial institutions. (True)• Wells Fargo is a financial institution. (True)• Therefore, Wells Fargo is a bank. (Not
necessarily true)• INVALID
Why did it fail? Because some financial institutions are not banks. Stock brokerages, credit unions, etc.
• The conclusion is true under these conditions, but it can be made false under different conditions.
24
Monday, January 9, 2012
![Page 25: Deductive and Inductive Arguments - OLDHAM'S HOUSE](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022020702/61f9daac26528b2a2d312db0/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Soundness
• A sound argument is a deductive argument that is valid and has all true premises.
• Soundness: (Valid) + (True premises)• These conditions will also lead to a true
conclusion as well.
• This is considered a truly good deductive argument.
25
Monday, January 9, 2012
![Page 26: Deductive and Inductive Arguments - OLDHAM'S HOUSE](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022020702/61f9daac26528b2a2d312db0/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Soundness• Sound:
– “All television networks are media companies. (True)– NBC is a television network. (True)– Therefore, NBC is a media company” (True)
• Unsound– “All automakers are computer manufacturers. (False,
but assumed true)– United Airlines is an automaker. (False, but assumed
true)– Therefore, United Airlines is a computer
manufacturer” (True, if the premises are true)26
Monday, January 9, 2012
![Page 27: Deductive and Inductive Arguments - OLDHAM'S HOUSE](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022020702/61f9daac26528b2a2d312db0/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Strong and Weak• Inductive arguments are those where it’s
improbable for there to be true premises and a false conclusion.
• If that claim is true, then it’s said to be a strong inductive argument.
• If it’s not improbable to have true premises/false conclusion, it’s said to be a weak inductive argument. 27
Monday, January 9, 2012
![Page 28: Deductive and Inductive Arguments - OLDHAM'S HOUSE](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022020702/61f9daac26528b2a2d312db0/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Testing for Strength• Assume the premises are true, and see if the
conclusion is probably true, based on that.Example:
• “All dinosaur bones discovered to this day have been at least 50 million years old.
• Therefore, probably the next dinosaur bone to be found will be at least 50 million years old”.
• The premises are true and lead to a conclusion that is probably true, so it’s a strong argument. 28
Monday, January 9, 2012
![Page 29: Deductive and Inductive Arguments - OLDHAM'S HOUSE](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022020702/61f9daac26528b2a2d312db0/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Example:• All meteorites found to this day have
contained sugar. • Therefore, probably the next meteorite to be
found will contain sugar”.• The premises are false in this argument, but
if we assume they’re true, then the conclusion is probably true too, so this is also a strong argument.
29
Monday, January 9, 2012
![Page 30: Deductive and Inductive Arguments - OLDHAM'S HOUSE](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022020702/61f9daac26528b2a2d312db0/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
• Example:• “When a lighted match is slowly dunked into
water, the flame is snuffed out. • But gasoline is a liquid, just like water. • Therefore, when a lighted match is slowly
dunked into gasoline, the flame will be snuffed out”.
• In this argument, the premises are true, but the conclusion is false. Thus, it is not difficult to assume the premises to be true. We merely check to see if they support the conclusion. We find they do not, so the argument is weak.
30
Monday, January 9, 2012
![Page 31: Deductive and Inductive Arguments - OLDHAM'S HOUSE](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022020702/61f9daac26528b2a2d312db0/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
• Truth or falsity when testing an argument (validity or strength) are relevant, but only to an extent.
• First you must assume the premises are true, and check to see if the conclusion is well supported. If it is well supported, then the argument is valid (deductive) or strong (inductive).
31
Monday, January 9, 2012
![Page 32: Deductive and Inductive Arguments - OLDHAM'S HOUSE](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022020702/61f9daac26528b2a2d312db0/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Cogency
• An inductive argument is said to be cogent when it is both strong and has all true premises.
• Cogency: (Strong) + (True premises)
• A cogent argument is considered to be the ideal “good” inductive argument.
32
Monday, January 9, 2012
![Page 33: Deductive and Inductive Arguments - OLDHAM'S HOUSE](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022020702/61f9daac26528b2a2d312db0/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
• Cogent• “All dinosaur bones discovered to this day have been at
least 50 million years old. • Therefore, probably the next dinosaur bone to be found
will be at least 50 million years old”.
• Not Cogent• All meteorites found to this day have contained sugar. • Therefore, probably the next meteorite to be found will
contain sugar”.
33
Monday, January 9, 2012
![Page 34: Deductive and Inductive Arguments - OLDHAM'S HOUSE](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022020702/61f9daac26528b2a2d312db0/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Quick Review
• Deductive or Inductive• Valid or Invalid• Sound or Unsound• Strong or Weak• Cogent or Not
34
Monday, January 9, 2012