Defect-mediated resonance shift of silicon-on-
insulator racetrack resonators
J. J. Ackert,1,* J. K. Doylend,
1 D. F. Logan,
1 P. E. Jessop,
2 R. Vafaei,
3 and L.
Chrostowski3 and A. P. Knights
1
1Department of Engineering Physics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4L7, Canada 2Department of Physics and Computer Science, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Ontario, N2L 3C5, Canada
3Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of British Columbia,
Vancouver,V6T 1Z4, British Columbia, Canada
Abstract: We present a study on the effects of inert ion implantation of
Silicon-On-Insulator (SOI) racetrack resonators. Selective ion implantation
was used to create deep-level defects within a portion of the resonator. The
resonant wavelength and round-trip loss were deduced for a range of
sequential post-implantation annealing temperatures from 100 to 300 °C. As
the devices were annealed there was a concomitant change in the resonance
wavelength, consistent with an increase in refractive index following
implantation and recovery toward the pre-implanted value. A total shift in
resonance wavelength of ~2.9 nm was achieved, equivalent to a 0.02
increase in refractive index. The excess loss upon implantation increased to
301 dB/cm and was reduced to 35 dB/cm following thermal annealing. In
addition to providing valuable data for those incorporating defects within
resonant structures, we suggest that these results present a method for
permanent tuning (or trimming) of ring resonator characteristics.
©2011 Optical Society of America
OSIC codes: (130.3120) Integrated optics devices; (250.5300) Photonic integrated circuits;
(230.5750) Resonators.
References and Links
1. L. Pavesi, and G. Guillot, “Optical Interconnects: The Silicon Approach,”,Vol. 119 Springer Series in Optical
Sciences, (Springer-Verlag 2006).
2. N. M. Wright, D. J. Thomson, K. L. Litvinenko, W. R. Headley, A. J. Smith, A. P. Knights, J. H. B. Deane, F. Y. Gardes, G. Z. Mashanovich, R. Gwilliam, and G. T. Reed, “Free carrier lifetime modification for silicon
waveguide based devices,” Opt. Express 16(24), 19779–19784 (2008).
3. M. W. Geis, S. J. Spector, M. E. Grein, J. U. Yoon, D. M. Lennon, and T. M. Lyszczarz, “Silicon waveguide
infrared photodiodes with > 35 GHz bandwidth and phototransistors with 50 AW1 response,” Opt. Express
17(7), 5193–5204 (2009).
4. J. K. Doylend, P. E. Jessop, and A. P. Knights, “Silicon photonic resonator-enhanced defect-mediated photodiode for sub-bandgap detection,” Opt. Express 18(14), 14671–14678 (2010).
5. D. F. Logan, P. Velha, M. Sorel, R. M. De La Rue, A. P. Knights, and P. E. Jessop, “Defect-enhanced Silicon-
on-insulator Waveguide Resonant Photodetector With High Sensitivity at 1.55 µm,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 22(20), 1530 (2010).
6. K. Preston, Y. H. D. Lee, M. Zhang, and M. Lipson, “Waveguide-integrated telecom-wavelength photodiode in
deposited silicon,” Opt. Lett. 36(1), 52–54 (2011). 7. I. Kiyat, A. Aydinli, and N. Dagli, “Low-Power Thermooptical Tuning of SOI Resonator Switch,” IEEE Photon.
Technol. Lett. 18(2), 364–366 (2006).
8. W. M. J. Green, M. J. Rooks, L. Sekaric, and Y. A. Vlasov, “Ultra-compact, low RF power, 10 Gb/s silicon Mach-Zender modulator,” Opt. Express 15(25),17106–17113 (2007).
9. G. T. Reed, G. Mashanovich, F. Y. Gardes, and D. J. Thompson, “Silicon Optical Modulators,” Nat. Photonics
4(8), 518–526 (2010). 10. R. A. Soref, and B. R. Bennett, “Electrooptical Effects in Silicon,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 23(1), 123–129
(1987).
11. Q. Xu, B. Schmidt, J. Shakya, and M. Lipson, “Cascaded silicon micro-ring modulators for WDM optical interconnection,” Opt. Express 14(20), 9431–9435 (2006).
#144602 - $15.00 USD Received 24 Mar 2011; revised 15 May 2011; accepted 27 May 2011; published 6 Jun 2011(C) 2011 OSA 20 June 2011 / Vol. 19, No. 13 / OPTICS EXPRESS 11969
12. C. W. White, J. Narayan, and R. T. Young, “Laser Annealing of Ion-Implanted Semiconductors,” Science
204(4392), 461–468 (1979). 13. W. Bogaerts, R. Baets, P. Dumon, V. Wiaux, S. Beckx, D. Taillaert, B. Luyssaert, J. Van Campenhout, P.
Bientsman, and D. Van Thourhout, “Nanophotonic Waveguides in Silicon-on-Insulator Fabricated with CMOS
Technology,” J. Lightwave Technol. 23(1), 401–412 (2005). 14. D. Taillaert, F. Van Laere, M. Ayre, W. Bogaerts, D. Van Thourout, P. Bientsman, and R. Baets, “Grating
Couplers for Coupling between Optical Fibers and Nanophotonic Waveguides,” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 45(No. 8A),
6071 (2006). 15. L. Pelaz, L. A. Marqués, and J. Barbolla, “Ion-beam-induced amorphization and recrystallization in silicon,” J.
Appl. Phys. 96(11), 5947 (2004).
16. P. J. Foster, J. K. Doylend, P. Mascher, A. P. Knights, and P. G. Coleman, “Optical attenuation in defect engineered silicon rib waveguides,” J. Appl. Phys. 99(7), 073101 (2006).
17. J. K. Doylend, “Defect-mediated photodetectors for silicon photonic circuits” PhD. Thesis, McMaster University
(2010). 18. T. Baehr-Jones, M. Hochberg, C. Walker, E. Chan, D. Koshinz, W. Krug, and A. Scherer, “Analysis of the
tuning sensitivity of silicon-on-insulator optical ring resonators,” J. Lightwave Technol. 23(12), 4215 (2005).
19. F. Y. Gardes, A. Brimont, P. Sanchis, G. Rasigade, D. Marris-Morini, L. O‟Faolain, F. Dong, J. M. Fedeli, P. Dumon, L. Vivien, T. F. Krauss, G. T. Reed, and J. Martí, “High-speed modulation of a compact silicon ring
resonator based on a reverse-biased pn diode,” Opt. Express 17(24), 21986–21991 (2009).
20. N. Rouger, L. Chrostowski, and R. Vafaei, “Temperature effects on silicon-on-insulator (SOI) racetrack resonators: A coupled analytic and 2-D finite difference approach,” J. Lightwave Technol. 28(9), 1380–1391
(2010).
1. Introduction
Silicon photonics continues to attract a great deal of attention as a likely candidate technology
for the implementation of optical interconnections [1]. Together with its compatibility with
standard Complimentary-Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor (CMOS) processing methods, the
scalability of silicon has a potential for terabit data transmission when deployed inside a
Wavelength Division Multiplexing (WDM) optical communication system paradigm. To this
end, the SOI ring (or race-track) resonator is a key building block offering the ability to
modulate, route and detect individual channels.
The deliberate introduction of ion implantation induced defects into silicon waveguides
has been demonstrated to expand the optical functionality of silicon-based optical integrated
circuits, for example through the modification of carrier lifetime [2] and the fabrication of
waveguide photodetectors with sensitivity to sub-band wavelengths [3].
This report presents quantitative data on the impact of low concentrations of deep-levels
on the real part of the refractive index of silicon waveguides for wavelengths around 1550
nm, obtained from the study of the effects of inert ion implantation on race-track resonators.
The data presented is of general interest to those wishing to incorporate defects into ring
resonators, such as in the case of the resonant detectors, recently reported by Doylend et al.
[4] Logan et al. [5] and Preston et al. [6].
We also note the potential for defect implantation as a means of device trimming. One of
the major issues facing the implementation of ring resonator structures is fabrication
tolerance. These devices rely on evanescent field coupling, which strongly depends on the
waveguide width and separation from the ring. Small variations that arise in fabrication
prevent a resonant structure achieving its design specification within accepted tolerance. In
this case, active tuning, often through application of the thermo-optic effect, is required to
modify the resonance. This can be accomplished by local heating of the ring with a resistive
metal strip [7]. Another method, limited to rib waveguides, is to use a p-i-n diode structure
over the waveguide [8,9]. Applying a bias changes the concentration of free carriers in the
ring, thus altering the refractive index [10]. These methods yield adequate tuning but
introduce added complexity to the device. For large devices containing multiple rings [11]
active tuning becomes less attractive as each device requires its own independent tuner and
control circuit. The tuners consume chip area and power, reducing the advantages gained by
using resonant structures over other geometries such as Mach-Zender Interferometers (MZI)
[8].
#144602 - $15.00 USD Received 24 Mar 2011; revised 15 May 2011; accepted 27 May 2011; published 6 Jun 2011(C) 2011 OSA 20 June 2011 / Vol. 19, No. 13 / OPTICS EXPRESS 11970
We demonstrate that the resonance location of silicon race-tracks can be shifted by
introducing deep-levels within the silicon bandgap via ion implantation and subsequent
annealing. This represents a method to passively, and permanently tune a resonant structure.
The tuning is accompanied by excess loss, but in many cases this trade-off may be within
device tolerance limits. These first results on defect mediated tuning suggest further
investigation to explore the limits of this technique, particularly in conjunction with selective
annealing as can be achieved via focussed laser activation [12].
2. Device description and experimental procedure
2.1 Formation of the waveguide structures
The structures used in this experiment were double-bus SOI racetrack resonators, consisting
of 30 µm radius curves and either 15 or 40 µm coupling regions. Fabrication was carried out
with the passive SOI platform of IMEC in Leuven, Belgium, and facilitated via CMC
Microsystems. The SOI wafers were comprised of a 220 nm thick top layer of silicon over a 2
µm buried oxide, and waveguides were patterned with 193 nm deep UV lithography [13].
Waveguide width was varied during fabrication by adjusting the photo-exposure; those
used in this study were estimated to be approximately 450 nm wide. Coupling in and out of
the waveguides was achieved through shallow-etch integrated grating couplers [14].
2.2 Ion implantation
Ion implantation was done at relatively high energy so that the implant species would
penetrate through to the oxide, leaving only structural, point defects in the waveguide layer.
Photolithography was used to define implantation windows as to avoid the coupling regions.
By avoiding the couplers we maintain the same coupling coefficients, which allows the
change in loss and the Quality factor (Q) from the implant to be observed. Figure 1 (a) shows
a scanning electron microscope (SEM) image of a racetrack resonator, while Fig. 1 (b) shows
the photomask layout of the implant windows.
Multiple chips were implanted with varying implant dosage below the amorphization
threshold [15]. The ions implanted were either boron at 350 keV or silicon at 700 keV,
energies sufficient for the ions to reside in the oxide layer. Subsequently in this work each
chip will be referred to in a manner which encompasses the implantation procedure it
underwent in terms of implant dosage, implant species, and a letter to signify variations in
resonator length; for example device A/1.75E14-Si refers to a chip with an implant dosage of
1.75x1014
cm2
, with silicon ions (at 700 keV). The prefix „A‟ designates a resonator
circumference of 218 µm, while „B‟ indicates 268 µm.
2.3 Characterization
After the implantation, cleaning the masking resist involved chip immersion in a H2SO4 +
H2O2 or „piranha etch‟ solution. The heat from this reaction formed the baseline annealing
temperature of 100 °C. Once implanted and cleaned, each resonator was annealed in
sequential steps of 25 °C, to a maximum of 300 °C. Measurements between annealing steps
were taken using a New Focus Model 6427 external cavity tunable diode laser, with a cleaved
polarization maintaining single mode fiber to couple light to the chip. A single mode fiber
was also used to couple light from the chip, where a Newport 818-1S1 power meter took
readings. Total coupling loss in and out of the device is estimated to be 11 dB. Repeated
measurements showed a maximum temperature drift of ± 0.1 nm, this error is small relative to
the total resonance shift observed.
#144602 - $15.00 USD Received 24 Mar 2011; revised 15 May 2011; accepted 27 May 2011; published 6 Jun 2011(C) 2011 OSA 20 June 2011 / Vol. 19, No. 13 / OPTICS EXPRESS 11971
Fig. 1. (a) SEM image of a racetrack resonator (b) The ion implantation photomask overlaid on
the racetrack design. The implantation windows avoid the couplers and bus waveguides. (SEM image taken at the Canadian Center for Electron Microscopy)
3. Results
3.1 Experimental results
Ion implantation and subsequent annealing has two pronounced effects on the resonator
characteristics. The first is a resonance shift observed after implantation, which decreases in
magnitude as the ring is annealed. The resonance wavelength thus progressively moves to
lower wavelengths after exposure to higher annealing temperatures. The second effect is that
the Q of the ring is reduced after implantation. This is unsurprising given the previously
reported increase in optical loss with increasing concentration of ion implantation defects in a
silicon waveguide [16]. As the annealing temperature is increased we observed the Q increase
towards the pre-implanted value.
An example of optical spectra for a single chip is shown in Fig. 2 where the transmitted
power of device A/3E14-Boron after various post-implantation annealing temperatures is
plotted.
Fig. 2. Resonance shifting for device A/3E14-Boron. The trend of this result is representative of other devices, including those that received silicon. As the annealing temperature is
increased the resonance peaks shift to lower wavelengths and the Q-factor increases.
The effect of implantation dose on the resonance shift and propagation loss is summarised
in Fig. 3. In Fig. 3(a), we show a comparison of resonance shift versus annealing temperature
for three nominally identical resonators (from three different chips) which received different
implant dosage. There is a clear increase in the resonance shift with increasing implantation
dose, indicating a direct relationship between the real component of the refractive index (RI)
and the concentration of deep levels introduced by the implantation. The shift in RI is positive
after ion implantation, with a progressive recovery toward the value for unimplanted
#144602 - $15.00 USD Received 24 Mar 2011; revised 15 May 2011; accepted 27 May 2011; published 6 Jun 2011(C) 2011 OSA 20 June 2011 / Vol. 19, No. 13 / OPTICS EXPRESS 11972
waveguides as annealing is increased. This is discussed in detail in section 3.2 Modelling the
RI shift.
To extract the propagation loss from measured data such as that shown in Fig. 2, the
resonance spectra were fitted with the analytical through-port transmission function for
double bus resonators with identical couplers, Eq. (1):
2 2 2 2
2 4 2
2 cos
1 2 cos
in
out
P t A t At
P A t At
(1)
where Pin is input power, Pout is output power, t is the transmission coefficient, γ is the
insertion loss, A = exp(αL) with L as the resonator length, α is the loss coefficient, and δ =
2π/(λneffL) is the phase. After fitting the results, it was found that the transmission coefficients
remained within the fitting error (as expected given that the coupling region was masked
during implantation), but the loss decreased with annealing. Figure 3(b) shows the extracted
values for excess propagation loss as a function of annealing temperature, for the same
devices as Fig. 3 (a). It is instructive to compare the loss values for the lowest temperature
anneal (which is likely to be representative of the loss in the as-implanted condition) to values
extracted from the empirical model proposed by Foster et al. [16]. The usefulness of the
Foster model is that it allows the comparison of expected loss for a wide range of
implantation conditions (i.e. variations in ion species, ion dose, and ion energy). For the
silicon implanted samples the values of expected loss would be 23, 96 and 152 dBcm1
for
increasing ion dose. These compare to measured values (shown in Fig. 3b) of 71, 239 and
301dBcm1
. The values measured here are thus approximately twice those which might be
expected from the empirical model proposed by Foster et al. We feel that this discrepancy is
not wholly unexpected given the different experimental conditions used by Foster et al. in
their work, from which the empirical model was developed. We also note that the Foster
model has previously underestimated experimental optical loss [16].
As the devices are annealed the loss trends downward, in a manner consistent with the
shift in resonance. The response of resonance wavelength and propagation loss to annealing is
similar. This is not surprising given that these properties represent the real and complex
components of the refractive index respectively, related via the Kramer-Kronig relations. The
precipitous decrease in both properties at temperatures > 200°C suggest that the deep-level
responsible for the initial post implantation change is the silicon divacancy, previously
observed to be the primary optically active defect formed after relatively low dose inert ion
implantation in a silicon waveguide [17].
Fig. 3. Resonance shift (relative to the implanted state), as a function of annealing: (a) three identical devices, were implanted with different doses of silicon at 700 keV; (b) the total
optical loss of the race-tracks. Note: Marker size is indicative of the uncertainty.
#144602 - $15.00 USD Received 24 Mar 2011; revised 15 May 2011; accepted 27 May 2011; published 6 Jun 2011(C) 2011 OSA 20 June 2011 / Vol. 19, No. 13 / OPTICS EXPRESS 11973
The increase in propagation loss may also be represented by the Q-factor of the resonator.
This was extracted by curve fitting and plotted in Fig. 4 for two representative devices. An
increase in blue shift of the resonance peak (compared with the as-implanted device annealed
at 100°C) corresponds to an increasing Q as the defects are removed.
Fig. 4. Quality Factor and resonance shift (relative to the implanted state) versus annealing temperature for resonator (a) A/1.5E14-Si and (b) B/1.25E12-Si
3.2 Modelling the RI shift
The change of the effective index of the SOI waveguide, versus the change in the silicon
index, is plotted at a representative wavelength of 1563 nm in Fig. 5 (a). The slope is dneff /
dnSi = 1.177. This quantity is also known as the effective index susceptibility, previously used
to describe the effective index changes in SOI waveguides due to the core index changes (due
to temperature) or cladding changes [18]. Figure 5 (b) shows the mode profile is increasingly
localized in the centre of the waveguide as index increases. This is similar to the effect of
modal dispersion and gives rise to an increase in the effective index that is surprisingly 17.7%
larger than the change in the silicon index itself.
Fig. 5. a) The change in the waveguide effective index as a function of the change in the silicon
index of refraction for a 450 x 220 nm waveguide at 1563 nm; b) The mode profile in the in-plane direction, at the centre of the waveguide (at a height of 110 nm), for different silicon
indices. nSi = 3.48 (red) and 3.47 (blue), nSiO2 = 1.444. 450 x 220 nm waveguide. This
waveguide has an ng (1563 nm) = 4.55.
Here, we derive expressions for the change in the resonance condition as a function of the
change in index of refraction. First, consider a resonator with a uniform non-dispersive
medium, with a length L. For a mode index m, the mode condition is given by Eq. (2).
#144602 - $15.00 USD Received 24 Mar 2011; revised 15 May 2011; accepted 27 May 2011; published 6 Jun 2011(C) 2011 OSA 20 June 2011 / Vol. 19, No. 13 / OPTICS EXPRESS 11974
2
m
nLm
(2)
A change in index of refraction leads to a change in resonance wavelength, Eq. (3):
d L
dn m n
(3)
In a resonator with dispersion (material, waveguide), the mode condition is given by Eq.
(4):
2 eff
m
n Lm
(4)
and the free-spectral range is Eq. (5):
2
,eff
g eff
g
dnFSR n n
Ln d
(5)
To analyze the effect of the change in silicon index of refraction, we need to consider the
change in the mode profile that changes the index of refraction. Thus, we can write the
expression for effective index as, Eq. (6):
eff eff
eff g Si
Si
dn dnn n n
d dn
(6)
Using the mode condition (Eq. (4), we equate the mode at the initial wavelength to the
shifted wavelength, shown in Eq. (7).
00
0 0
eff effeffg Sig
Si
dn dndnn nn
d dnd
(7)
This allows us to find the wavelength shift, which simplifies to Eq. (8):
effSi
g Si
dnn
n dn
(8)
We note that in the case where the effective index change is equal to the silicon index
change, i.e., neglecting effective index susceptibility, the wavelength shift reduces to Eq. (9).
This relation was presented previously in [19]:
0
eff
g
n
n
(9)
In essence, the shift in resonance wavelength is determined by three factors: a) the shift in
the material index of refraction, b) the material and waveguide dispersion – a change in
wavelength causes a further change in effective index, and c) the change in material index
changes the mode profile resulting in an additional effective index change. It should be noted
that the same effect is found in the temperature dependence of waveguide-based resonators
[18,20].
Using Eq. (8) we can now calculate the maximum index shift for the implanted resonators
as a function of dose. The group index, ng = 4.545, was found from the resonator free-spectral
range, length and operating wavelength λ0 = 1563nm. From Fig. 3 the doses used were 1.25 x
1012
cm2
, 7.5 x 1013
cm2
and 1.75 x 1014
cm2
. The resonance wavelengths were shifted,
respectively, Δλ = 0.7 nm, 2.2 nm and 2.9 nm. With approximately one third of the waveguide
#144602 - $15.00 USD Received 24 Mar 2011; revised 15 May 2011; accepted 27 May 2011; published 6 Jun 2011(C) 2011 OSA 20 June 2011 / Vol. 19, No. 13 / OPTICS EXPRESS 11975
being implanted, this leads to increases in the silicon refractive index of ΔnSi = 0.005, 0.016
and 0.021 respectively.
3.3 Summary
The results described above provide an important insight into the impact of defects on the
characteristics of a ring resonator. The deliberate introduction of defects into a resonant
structure to date has been limited to the development of resonant enhanced detectors [4,5].
However, we suggest here that defect injection and selective annealing offers an intriguing
solution to post fabrication trimming of the response of resonators across a complete wafer.
Clearly, blanket ion implantation and traditional thermal annealing will simply result in a
systematic shift in the characteristics of all resonators on a single wafer. However, selective
laser-assisted annealing may provide local removal of defects on an areal scale of tens of
square microns [12]. This would then facilitate test and trimming at the wafer scale of each
resonator. The most obvious disadvantage of this approach is the increase in round-trip loss
with defect introduction. Future work will help elucidate the limitations of this trimming
technique.
4 . Conclusion
SOI double bus racetrack resonators have undergone selective ion implantation to introduce
deep level defects into the silicon waveguide. We have observed a shift in resonance of nearly
3 nm after ion implantation of silicon at an energy of 700 keV and a dose of 1.5x1014
cm2
.
The magnitude of the resonance shift corresponds to the excess loss within the resonator. This
is evidence for a refractive index increase of 0.021 associated with the concentration of
structural point defects within the silicon waveguide. This shift in the real part of the
refractive index, when combined with selective laser assisted annealing, presents a method for
permanent tuning of resonators on the wafer level scale.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Jack Hendriks at the University of Western Ontario for ion
implantation, Chris Brooks at McMaster University for photolithography assistance and Dan
Deptuck at CMC Microsystems for facilitating the device design and Greg Wojcik for useful
discussions. We also thank Lumerical Solutions Inc. for providing the mode solver MODE
solutions. The authors acknowledge the support of CMC Microsystems, the Canadian Institute
for Photonic Innovations and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of
Canada.
#144602 - $15.00 USD Received 24 Mar 2011; revised 15 May 2011; accepted 27 May 2011; published 6 Jun 2011(C) 2011 OSA 20 June 2011 / Vol. 19, No. 13 / OPTICS EXPRESS 11976