Download - Developing a Tutorial for Grouping Analysis in ArcGIS

Developing a Tutorial for Grouping Analysis in ArcGIS

Daniel PierreMay 29, 2014

1. Introduction

2. Data

3. Grouping Analysis Workflows

4. Tutorial Exercises

5. Conclusions: Recommendations

Presentation Outline

Lauren Rosenshein Bennett, MSGeoprocessing Product Engineer, [email protected]

Dr. Konrad DramowiczFaculty, Centre of Geographic

[email protected]

Dr. Ela DramowiczFaculty, Centre of Geographic

[email protected]

Introduction

Project Sponsor & Supervisors

Introduction

• Experimental testing of tool with multiple datasets

• Incorporation of Grouping Analysis with other tools

• Review of technical literature on clustering algorithms

• Review of existing tutorials

Project Overview

Introduction

• Introduced at ArcGIS 10.1

• Available with Basic, Standard and Advanced license levels

• Found in the Spatial Statistics toolbox, within the Mapping Clusters toolset

• Script tool

Grouping Analysis Tool

Introduction

• “...Performs a classification procedure that tries to find natural clusters in your data.” - Esri

• An aid for data comprehension• Feature similarity is based on

attributes specified as analysis fields and optionally, spatial constraints

• Given a number of groups, features within each output group are as similar as possible while groups are as different as possible


Introduction

• Two algorithm types: cluster analysis (traditional K-means) and regionalization (spatial K-means)

• Thirteen parameters (six required)

• Grouping results contingent on the number of groups, analysis fields, and type of spatial constraint


Data

Features:• Esri• City of Vancouver

Multivariate Data:• World Bank• BBC• Weatherbase• Statistics Canada

Data Sources

Data

• Data Enrichment (ArcGIS Online)

• HTML table import

• Spreadsheet reformatting

• Table joins

• Feature class edits

Data Preparation

Data

Selection Criteria:

• Two scales of analysis

• Illustration of various spatial constraint effects on results

• Sufficient number of features

• Visible spatial patterns in results

Tutorial Datasets

General Steps:

• Exploratory data analysis

• Preprocessing

• Determining appropriate Grouping Analysis settings

• Postprocessing, interpretation and evaluation of results

Grouping Analysis Workflows

Exploratory Data Analysis

1. Distribution of variable values• Thematic mapping• Spatial autocorrelation

2. Spatial relationships among features

• Contiguity of features and number of neighbours

• Spatial autocorrelation



• Explore distribution of dataset variables

• Choropleth maps and graduated symbol maps

• Identify set of variables to be used for Grouping Analysis

Thematic Mapping


• Analyze contiguity relationships among features

• Polygon Neighbors tool

• Determine relative connectivity of features by counting number of neighbours

• Frequency tool

Spatial Relationships


• Analyze contiguity and/or proximity relationships among features using GeoDa

• Create spatial weights

• Display histogram of feature connectivity according to defined spatial relationships

• Histogram linked to map and attribute table

Alternative Approach


• Considers attribute values and location of features simultaneously

• Moran’s I statistic determines whether spatial pattern of values is dispersed, random or clustered

• Significance of pattern evaluated with corresponding z-score

• One variable at a time

Spatial Autocorrelation

Preprocessing

Use hot spots to limit study area for Grouping Analysis:

• Calculate incremental spatial autocorrelation

• Identify distance band of most intense clustering

• Create hot spot map• Select features from original

dataset based on location of hot spots

Preprocessing

Grouping Analysis Settings

1. How many groups should be created?

2. Which analysis fields should be used?

3. Is a spatial constraint necessary? If so, which type is appropriate?

Grouping Analysis Settings:Key Considerations


• Default number is 2

• Sturge’s rule:

C = 1 + 3.3 log(n), whereC is the number of groups and n is the number of features

• Evaluate the optimal number of groups (up to a maximum of 15)

Number of Groups


Two vs. Three Groups


• Generally driven by research purpose and objectives of grouping

• Guide selection of analysis fields with exploratory data analysis findings

• Spatial variables may be used as indirect spatial constraints

• Assess effectiveness of fields to distinguish features with output report

Analysis Fields


Temperature: Spatial Variable


• Choice of spatial constraint or no spatial constraint determines which algorithm is used for grouping

• No spatial constraint – traditional K-Means (data space only)

• Any spatial constraint – Spatial ‘K’luster Analysis by Tree Edge Removal (SKATER) method (spatial K-Means)

Spatial Constraints


No Spatial Constraint vs.Spatial Constraint


• Contiguity – edges only (“rook” type) or edges and corners (“queen” type)

• Delaunay triangulation – contiguity of representations of features as Voronoi polygons

• Proximity – K nearest neighbours

• Spatial weights

Spatial Constraint Types


• Evaluate optimal number of groups

• Guide selection of analysis fields with calculated R2 values

• Visually assess results of specified spatial constraint

Iterative Process for Optimizing Grouping Analysis

Interpretation & Evaluation

• Spatial distribution of groups (map)

• Global statistics (output report)

• Group and variable statistics (output report)

• Group profiles

Interpretation of Results


• Compare group means with each other and global range

Group Profiles


• Compare group means and ranges for each variable

Group Profiles (2)

• Consider global mean, median and range for each variable

Group Profiles (3)



• Global Moran’s I statistic

• Determine spatial pattern of group membership

• Measure spatial compactness of group membership

• Clustered groups generally desired

Evaluation of Results: Spatial Autocorrelation

Dispersed

Clustered

Random


• Smallest to largest group

• Indicator of balance in group membership

• Balanced number of group members generally desired for comparison of statistics

• Frequency tool

Evaluation of Results: Cluster Size Ratio


• Goodness measure that combines concepts of cohesion and separation

• Adapted from cluster analysis to consider attribute data and location

• Silhouette coefficient is calculated for every feature and the average is taken for the entire dataset

Evaluation of Results: Silhouette


(B – A) / max(A, B) where

A is the distance between a feature and its group center

B is the distance between the feature and its neighbouring group center

Silhouette Coefficient


• Range between –1 (poor) and 1 (excellent)

• < 0.2 indicates poor clustering

• > 0.5 indicates good partition of the data

Silhouette Coefficient Values

Tutorial Exercises

• Six exercises

• Two scenarios (3 exercises for each)

• Suitable for users at all levels of experience

• Exercises take the user through the steps of preprocessing, group creation, interpretation and evaluation of results outlined here

Grouping Analysis Tutorial

Tutorial Exercises

Exercises:

1. Data exploration

2. Grouping for exploratory data analysis

3. Using Spatial Statistics tools to target areas of interest

Scenario 1: Analysis of Crime in Chicago

Tutorial Exercises

Exercises:

4. Create groups and use results to write profiles

5. Explore effects of spatial constraints

6. Evaluation of results

Scenario 2: Analysis of Olympic Results

Tutorial Exercises

1. All tutorial exercises use polygon data exclusively; point features not covered

2. Space-time constraints using spatial weights matrix file not covered

3. Catered to general user; no exercises specifically target advanced users

Limitations

Recommendations

1. Exploratory data analysis

2. Grouping Analysis

3. Evaluation of results

Recommendations: Enhancements and Additional Tools

Recommendations

• Multi-step process using Polygon Neighbors, Frequency and table joins could be simplified

• Dynamic linking of objects can make use of existing ArcGIS functionality

Determining Spatial Relationships Among Features

Recommendations

• Expand types of spatial relationships that can be analyzed

• Enable the analysis of higher order relationships

Determining Spatial Relationships Among Features (continued)

Recommendations

• Tools for determining most useful diagnostic or predictor variables

• Guide selection of analysis fields for data partitioning

• Adapt neural networks or other data mining tools to work with spatial constraints

Identification of Useful Diagnostic Variables

Recommendations

Grouping Analysis Tool Enhancements

• Create unique identifier

• Replace null values

Recommendations

• Spatial weights matrix can be used as the spatial constraint for creating groups

• Custom weights require either manual table creation or programming

• Solution: interactive feature selection

User-defined spatial relationships among features

Recommendations

• Expand beyond R2 and F-statistic values in output report

• Adapt methods used to evaluate cluster analysis algorithms (e.g. Silhouette)

• Challenge: universally applicable evaluation methods may not be feasible

Evaluation of Results

THANK YOU!

Download - Developing a Tutorial for Grouping Analysis in ArcGIS

Top Related