Download - Disability Management: Accept and Assist
Page 1
De-medicalizing Disability Management
“Accept and Assist”.
Matthew Burnstein, MD, MCFP, MRO
Chief Medical Officer – Bell Aliant
Feb 13th, 2014
Page 2
Objectives
• Understand Total Cost and the Drivers of Disability
• Weakness in the Traditional Approach to Disability Management
• Time for a Paradigm Shift? • A New Model• Study the results• Lessons Learned
Page 3
Bell Aliant Regional Communications
• 7000 union and non union members (>60% unionized)• 6 provinces, widely dispersed• Customer care workers, field technicians, engineers, marketing
and sales, finance, support services• TV, internet, home security systems and phones – ever-
changing product mix• Former monopoly • <2% staff turnover• In house team of Health and Wellness (H&W) professionals• Self insured for short term disability- up to 1 yr at full salary• Unlimited incidental absence at 100% pay
Page 4
TOTAL COSTS OF DISABILITY
STDINCIDENTAL
WCB
OvertimeBenefitsMorale
Increased stress for colleaguesCustomer Satisfaction
Increased workloadLost Sales Opportunities
Paperwork / ReportingTraining/Retraining
DIRECT COSTS
INDIRECT COSTS(INDIRECT COSTS ARE 2.5-3.5 X DIRECT COSTS)
Cost to Employee and their Family!
Presenteeism- double this
number!
Drug/health costs
Page 5
What’s behind the high rates of disability today?
We’ve never been healthier,
never lived as long,
never had such great medical knowledge,
yet, as a society,
we’ve never been so disabled.
Page 6
How does an individual end up disabled?
An Individual with a complaint
becomes a
Patient with an illness,
who becomes a
Claimant with a disability.
In most cases, the evolution is driven by the individual, not by the illness or the physician.
Page 7
Does the medical model explain disability?
Page 8
• “The experience of disability is more related to society’s willingness to accommodate and individual motivation than any underlying impairment or limitation. Our narrow concepts of health and disability limit our potential.
• Over the years, I have been impressed by the relative lack of correlation between impairment and disability….Much of disability results from learned experiences, lack of adaptive skills and reinforcements from physicians, family members, attorneys, employers and others.
• We can no longer accept this societal illness; the costs are too enormous”.
Dr Chris BrighamPresident ABIMEPreface the MDAs
Page 9
Page 10
Only a small fraction of medically excused days off work is medically required – meaning work of any kind is medically contraindicated. The remaining days off work result from a variety of non-medical factors such as administrative delays of treatment and specialty referral, lack of transitional work, ineffective communications, lax management, and logistical problems. These days off are based on non-medical decisions and are either discretionary or clearly unnecessary. Participants in the disability benefits system seem largely unaware that so much disability is not medically required. Absence from work is “excused” and benefits are generally awarded based on a physician’s decision confirming that a medical condition exists. This implies that a diagnosis creates disability.
ACOEM Guideline on Preventing Needless Work Disability by Helping People Stay Employed
Page 11
Page 12
• “Disability is a complicated psychosocial problem that extends beyond the sole question of illness or injury. Many factors contribute to the complexity of the problem.
• They include, but are not limited to an individual’s values and beliefs; the role of illness in the individual’s childhood..; the specific symbolic meaning of illness or injury to the individual; the individual’s relationship with his employer; economic issues; workplace accommodations made available by the employer; and the employer’s policies/practices, culture, and values”.
Dr Presley ReedThe Medical Disability Advisor 4th Ed.
Page 13
Disability is not a medical concept
Defined by a contract, usually related to occupation
Therefore, it is a legal rather than a medical concept
Influenced by non medical factors :– Employer, availability of alternate duties– Training, experience, education– Psychosocial factors– Personality
Page 14
Doctors are trained to treat illness,
not disability
Reality check:
Page 15
Physician’s Perspective On Disability Determination
• 86% of physicians believe that completing disability forms adversely affects the physician-patient relationship
• 62% feel it represents a conflict of interest• 56% are willing to exaggerate clinical data
to assist a deserving patient• Physicians report a lack of confidence in their
ability to determine disability (self rated ability as 4.5/10)
• 80% of physicians feel it would be better for an independent group to determine disability
Journal of General Internal Medicine 1996 11(9)
Page 16
Page 17
Certificate of Disability Canadian Medical Association Policy
• The CMA believes it is the employer’s responsibility to supervise an employee who is absent from work for a short time because of a minor illness. The medical profession objects to being asked to police such absenteeism.
• The association objects to the use of physicians as “truant officers”.
• It is generally accepted that most minor illnesses are self limiting and do not require the intervention of a physician.
Page 18
Page 19
Medical Post 4/5/99
Page 20
Gross Absence Rates Agriculture 1.7% Trade & Commerce 2.3% Finance 3.3% Construction 3.4% Manufacturing 4.8% Government 5.3% (Perspectives 1999) USA 3.5% Sweden 6.0% France 8.3% Italy 11.6% Unionized ees 13.2 days/yr vs Non Unionized ees 7.5 days/yr (Stats Can 2011)
If illness was the cause of absenteeism, then absence rates should be similar across communities. But they are not:
Page 21
What are the reasons we miss work?
Global/Environment Organization Personal
Region (NS vs AB) Culture Job
Climate Type Gender
Race Size Age
Economy HR policy Schedule
Pension Age Relationships Job Satisfaction
Social Programs Quality of Supervision Transportation
Health Services Sick pay/benefits Family
Epidemics Turnover/Churn Personality
Religion/Culture Working Conditions Individual Health
Health Services Work demands
Leadership Physical workspace
Page 22
The primary determinant of work attendance is job satisfaction:
Adding Value Being Valued Sharing Values
Page 23
Drivers…
• What makes people come to work?– Opportunity, Desire and Ability– Global / Environment / Organization / Personal
variables can affect those
• Who decides if working is possible?– Decision to work is made by the individual– The decision to offer alternate duties and provide
accommodation is made by employer– Neither is a medical decision
Page 24 But beware the golden handcuffs
Page 25
And you want employees to like their work……….
Page 26
“It is always more important to know what type of person has a disease than it is to know what type of disease a person has.”
Hippocrates:
Page 27
Disability vs Disease• Disability and disease are distinct concepts;
diagnosis does not determine disability• Doctors don’t know disability and are not truant
officers• Disability from work is determined by a multitude
of non medical factors• While supporting the concept of early return to
work, doctors are patient advocates, and ultimately, patients determine their ability to work
• The workplace/workplace policies must encourage employees to remain at work (even in the face of challenges)
• Engagement may reduce absenteeism
Page 28
So, if disability is not driven by disease, and doctors don’t know much about
disability or the workplace, what do we do?
How do we determine or manage disability?
Page 29
The first paradigm shift
Stop talking to doctors and start
talking to employees.
Page 30
Talk to employees
• Doctors talk to their patients - they trust them and advocate for them, but they don’t know the workplace
• Trust your employees – they are telling you the truth* • Treat them as you’d treat a manager or a colleague
or want to be treated yourself• They know their job and what aspects they can do
and can’t do• Allow them flexibility to do the job• It is their motivation which determines outcome – so
what is motivating them to come to work or keep them off?
* Most of the time. Why treat the 99% who are honest to catch the 1%?
Page 31
What’s going on?
What you see
What you don’t see
WORKPLACE SYMPTOMSARE ONLY THE
“TIP OF THE ICEBERG”
S p i l l o v e r
Work Issues• Environmental• Interpersonal• Job-Related
KNOWING THE SOURCE OF THE PROBLEM
ALLOWS THE CASE MANAGER TO DETERMINE A
COURSE OF ACTION
Health Issues• Heart Health• Nutrition• Sleeping • Depression
Life Issues• Stress/Emotional• Relationships• Legal/ Financial• Addictions
Lateness
Emotional outbursts
Withdrawal
Mood Swings
S p i l l o v e r
Troubled or Absent Employee
Page 32
The Second Paradigm Shift
• Accept them and help them• You cannot rehabilitate someone who is busy proving they are
disabled• Malingerer’s are rare. Anxious and overwhelmed individuals are
common.• Often the claimant is just in the wrong basket – needs family
leave, needs to change jobs, needs to be on administrative leave or re-assigned while workplace conflict is addressed
• Chronic diseases are chronic/recurrent and need to be addressed holistically (is public health up to the task?)
• Whatever the barrier or reason for being off work, the outcome is better, and total cost reduced, if you support the employee and work through the issues
Page 33
The Third Paradigm Shift: think long term
• Employees are there for the long term, so you need to think long-term
• An injured/ill employee who could be at work, but chooses not to rtw, generates a greater loss to the organization over the long term than the “extra” few weeks of sick leave. They are disengaged.
• Presenteeism costs more than absenteeism• Forcing an employee to rtw when they feel
they are “unfit” will cost the employer money every day
Page 34
Tools to Assist the Shift: Health Assessment
A complement to, not a replacement for, a discussion between manager and employee.
Health Assessment Type When to use
Health Status •Proactive•Accommodation Issues
Attendance •Medical issues impacting attendance•Level 3-Attendance Support
Ergonomic •Persistent Ergonomic Issues
Return to Work •Assess fitness to return to work from LTD, Administrative Leaves, etc. (used infrequently)
Page 35
Train Managers to Identify Employees at Risk
• How to help employees stay at work– Identify employees who is having difficulties, as early as
possible.
• Absence is a predictable event– How to predict absences?
• Know the workplace / know the people and know when action is necessary
Page 36 36
Tools to Assist Shift: Attendance/Performance Improvement
Program
• Triggered when there is a demonstrated history of being over the average for the department for absence or not meeting performance targets
• Absence is absence –– it’s not why you missed work, it’s that you missed work (assumed innocent).
• The reasons for the absences/poor performance determine the help needed.
• Early identification is key.
• No fault, no blame but the absences/performance is an issue –What can you do? What can we do?
• Non-disciplinary
Page 37
Transitional Return to Work
Page 38
Transitional Return To Work
• Focus on ability not inability• Manager and employee (+/- health services)• Part of corporate culture - it should be expected
(and employer should be prepared with options)
• Time limited – it’s a transition not a move• Progressive (but flexible)• Must be safe (for ee, co-workers, public)• Goal is rehabilitation – it cannot be punitive• Work must have meaning• Workplace must be welcoming
Page 39
Bell Aliant is Committed to Early and Safe RTW (as is the Union!)
• 28.12 It is agreed that the rehabilitation of sick and injured employees is a priority. The Company and the Council will participate in programs that will enable early and safe return to work…The rehabilitation plan will be based on the employee’s functional capability, input from the employee’s existing health care providers, and other health care professionals as deemed necessary by the company.
Page 40
Manager and Employee can decide on
modified duties – LRA 2008-04.
• If the employee’s restrictions are expected to last 30 days or less and the employee can be accommodated under the terms of the collective agreement, no action is required other than proceeding with the accommodation request. If however, the employee cannot be accommodated under the terms of the collective agreement, then medical documentation may be required. At any time, the manager can seek input from Health and Wellness. The manager must inform the local shop steward of the details of the accommodation and the duration.
Page 41
Mental Health Initiative
• 1/3rd of claims, last 50-100% longer• MH issues start young and recur• Often months of presenteeism before absence
(opportunity to intervene)• There are often workplace drivers and workplace
solutions! (another opportunity to intervene)• Mental health awareness training for Leaders of
people• Educational sessions, communications• Focus on early recognition, highlight resources
Page 42
Results of this Approach
• Gross Absence Rate* 4.5%>4.3%>4.1%>3.6%>3.6% (2013)
• SDB as % salary` 1.36%>1.28%> 1.24% >0.97% >0.99%• Denials < 1% - usually wrong basket• Grievances on denials – rare • Relationship with Union - positive• # of Health Assessments – increased (some referred by
Union)• # of IMEs for SDB adjudication – rare• # of IMEs for HA’s and SDB mgmnt - frequent
* Cdn GAR: Company >500 ee =4.4%;Unionized Workplace 5.3% (stats can 2011)
`SDB % of Income Cdn average 1.5% (Towers Watson)
Page 43
Lessons Learned• Accept and Assist trumps Deny and Defend• Think Total Cost and think long term• Talk to employees, not doctors• Engage HR/LR/Ops in program development – make them
stakeholders/ambassadors; train mgrs/union• Don’t under estimate cultural resistance• Become health navigators – focus on Chronic Disease• Orient new employees/managers• Address presenteeism- its your next SDB claim, offer help• Performance = Attendance improvement• EE who can, but won’t participate in TRTW, is likely
disengaged and a problem beyond their SDB claim
Page 44
THANK YOU ……….Questions?