Download - Diversification of Parameter Uncertainty
![Page 1: Diversification of Parameter Uncertainty](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813a0d550346895da1e0af/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Diversification of Parameter Uncertainty
Eric R. Ulm
Georgia State University
![Page 2: Diversification of Parameter Uncertainty](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813a0d550346895da1e0af/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Defining an Ambiguous Risk
• Case 1: Risk: 2% chance of hurricane next year.
• Case 2: Ambiguity: Expert 1 says 1% chance, Expert 2 says 3%. You think there is a 50% chance of each expert being correct.
![Page 3: Diversification of Parameter Uncertainty](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813a0d550346895da1e0af/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Effect of Ambiguity on Premiums
• Hogarth and Kunreuther (1989) surveyed actuaries. They found for risks of this size, the ratio of prices charged for ambiguous and standard risks was in the range 1.50-2.00.
![Page 4: Diversification of Parameter Uncertainty](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813a0d550346895da1e0af/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Should ambiguity affect premiums?
• Yes and no.
• One time Ellsberg Game
• Game 1: One urn, 50 black, 50 white
• Game 2: One urn, X black, 1-X white. X=75 or 25. (Type A or Type B)
Payoff of $100,000 for your ball. What do you pick?
![Page 5: Diversification of Parameter Uncertainty](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813a0d550346895da1e0af/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Probably Not
• Game 1, choose white, 50% probability of winning.
• Game 2, flip a coin for ball color.– Type A. 50% white choice times 25% white
drawn plus 50% black choice times 75% black drawn is 50%!
– Type B. 50% white choice times 75% white drawn plus 50% black choice times 25% black drawn is 50%!
![Page 6: Diversification of Parameter Uncertainty](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813a0d550346895da1e0af/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Hidden Assumptions
• Choice of color to bet is voluntary
• Choice of color to bet is made after the urn type (A or B) is determined
• The game is played only once.
![Page 7: Diversification of Parameter Uncertainty](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813a0d550346895da1e0af/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Argument Also Valid If:
• Urn type (A or B) is a 50-50 choice by the selector. Choice of color need not be voluntary, but still must be made only once.
• Game can be played repeatedly if the voluntary choice of white or black can be changed (by a coin flip) every period.
![Page 8: Diversification of Parameter Uncertainty](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813a0d550346895da1e0af/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
yes and NO
• Froot and Posner (2002) use a more formal version of this argument to price catastrophe bonds with binary payouts.
• They say ambiguity should not affect risks (i.e. ambiguity aversion is “irrational”)
![Page 9: Diversification of Parameter Uncertainty](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813a0d550346895da1e0af/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Multiple Periods
• Choice of ball color fixed in time
• Urn is fixed for all periods
• Ambiguity aversion is just risk aversion
![Page 10: Diversification of Parameter Uncertainty](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813a0d550346895da1e0af/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Two periods-Ambiguous
• 2 hurricanes .5*.03^2+.5*.01^2=.0005
• 1 hurricane .5*2*.03*.97+.5*2*.01*.99=.0390
• No hurricanes .5*.97^2+.5*.99^2=.9605
• Mean 2%, standard deviation 9.92472%
![Page 11: Diversification of Parameter Uncertainty](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813a0d550346895da1e0af/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Two Periods - Unambiguous
• 2 hurricanes .02^2=.0004
• 1 hurricane 2*.02*.98=.0392
• No hurricanes .98^2=.9604
• Mean 2%, standard deviation 9.89949%
• Smaller Sigma!
![Page 12: Diversification of Parameter Uncertainty](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813a0d550346895da1e0af/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Long Haul
• Ambiguous: Mean 2%, Sigma 1%
• Unambiguous: Mean 2%, Sigma 0%
• No longer insuring hurricanes, but insuring the model!
• Effect would disappear if insurers could choose to bet on hurricanes with a coin flip.
![Page 13: Diversification of Parameter Uncertainty](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813a0d550346895da1e0af/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
General Case:Multiple Ambiguous Risks
• Probability Parameters: , ,… drawn once• Produce Mean and Standard Dev • From Central Limit Theorem: Mean of the
average of a large number of draws from this distribution approaches normal distribution with mean and Standard Dev 0.
• is an “ordinary” risk
k1 k
2 kn
k k
kkp kp
![Page 14: Diversification of Parameter Uncertainty](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813a0d550346895da1e0af/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Diversifying the Ambiguity
• Type 1 Risks (Hurricanes), Type 2 Risks (Earthquakes), … , Type n Risks
• Which “expert” is right is uncorrelated from risk to risk.
• Type “k” risks are mean drawn from distribution with mean and standard deviation
• Each is an insignificant part of the total
km
kp
ks
ki
![Page 15: Diversification of Parameter Uncertainty](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813a0d550346895da1e0af/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
More Diversifying Ambiguity
• The mean payout per claim is
• Central Limit Again. This approaches a
normal with mean and standard
deviation 0. It is riskless!
n
kk
n
k
kk
i
pi
1
1
n
kk
n
k
kk
i
mim
1
1
![Page 16: Diversification of Parameter Uncertainty](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813a0d550346895da1e0af/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Complication #1:Correlation of Parameter Means
• Hurricanes and Earthquakes are uncorrelated
• Correlation Across Models: For example, if Company “High Risk” model for hurricanes is correct, their model for earthquakes is more likely to be right (and vice versa)
• Different than bias toward bad results.
![Page 17: Diversification of Parameter Uncertainty](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813a0d550346895da1e0af/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Markowitz-ish
• Mean payout per claim is normal with mean and standard
deviation
• Risk Averse Insurance Company changes values of weights to maximize utility.
• Suspiciously like Markowitz and CAPM
n
k
kk
n
k
kk wpw
11
n
k
kkmwm
1
jn
j
iijji
n
i
ssww
11
![Page 18: Diversification of Parameter Uncertainty](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813a0d550346895da1e0af/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Complication #2:Correlation of individual risks
• Hurricanes correlated with other hurricanes.
• Earthquakes correlated with other earthquakes.
• Individual hurricanes and earthquakes are uncorrelated.
• Model parameter realizations are uncorrelated.
![Page 19: Diversification of Parameter Uncertainty](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813a0d550346895da1e0af/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Diversifying Away Ambiguity Again
• Correlation if• is a random draw from distribution with mean
and standard deviation (not necessarily normal)
• Central Limit Theorem approaches mean and standard deviation 0 (if no correlation among different types of risks)
• Central Limit Theorem approaches mean and standard deviation 0 (if no correlation among parameter means). No risk!
kk
0 kkij ji
kpk
n
k
kk pw
1
n
k
kkw
1
n
k
kkw
1
n
k
kkmwm
1
![Page 20: Diversification of Parameter Uncertainty](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813a0d550346895da1e0af/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Combine Complications 1 and 2
• is a random draw from distribution with mean and standard deviation (not necessarily normal)
• Central Limit Theorem approaches mean and standard deviation 0 (if no correlation among different types of risks)
kpk
![Page 21: Diversification of Parameter Uncertainty](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813a0d550346895da1e0af/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Markowitz-ish Again
• Mean payout per claim is normal with mean and standard
deviation
• Risk Averse Insurance Company changes values of weights to maximize utility.
• Suspiciously like Markowitz and CAPM
n
k
kk
n
k
kk wpw
11
n
k
kkmwm
1
jn
j
iijji
n
i
ssww
11
![Page 22: Diversification of Parameter Uncertainty](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813a0d550346895da1e0af/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Complication 3 (and 1 and 2)
• 1: Hurricanes correlated with other hurricanes and earthquakes correlated with other earthquakes.
• 2: Model Parameters are correlated• 3: Individual hurricanes and earthquakes are
correlated, modeled by correlation between and given and is
kipm
jpk m km
![Page 23: Diversification of Parameter Uncertainty](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813a0d550346895da1e0af/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Worst Math Yet
• It can be shown the that correlation between and given and is:
mp m
mk
km
mmm
kkk
i
j
mj
ki
i
i
mmkk
m
i
j
mj
k
i
i
ki
mmkk
mk
ii
ppCovi
p
i
pCov
ppCov
mk
mk
11
11 ),(),(),(
![Page 24: Diversification of Parameter Uncertainty](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813a0d550346895da1e0af/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Diversification Step 1
• approaches a distribution with mean and standard deviation
n
k
kk pw
1
n
k
kkw
1
jn
j
iijji
n
i
jjn
j
ii
ji
ij
ji
n
i
wwpp
ww
1111
![Page 25: Diversification of Parameter Uncertainty](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813a0d550346895da1e0af/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Diversification Step 2
• approaches a distribution with mean and standard deviation
• Combining these facts, is distributed with mean and standard deviation
• Still Markowitz and CAPM-ish
n
k
kkw
1
n
k
kkmw
1
n
j
jiijji
n
i
ssww11
n
k
kk pw
1
n
k
kkmwm
1
n
j
jiij
jiijji
n
i
n
j
jiijji
n
i
n
j
jiijji
n
i
sswwsswwww111111
![Page 26: Diversification of Parameter Uncertainty](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813a0d550346895da1e0af/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Uncertainty in Asset Risks
• Volatility cannot be diversified away independently of the parameter uncertainty.
• Mathematics is identical. is distributed with mean and standard deviation
• Investors see a larger risk ex ante, but ex post risk is only the measured sigmas, not s’s.
• Could explain equity premium puzzle
n
k
kk pw
1
n
j
jiij
jiijji
n
i
n
j
jiijji
n
i
n
j
jiijji
n
i
sswwsswwww111111
![Page 27: Diversification of Parameter Uncertainty](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813a0d550346895da1e0af/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Learning and Multiple Period Risks
• Full Bayesian Updating of Premium
• Model A, 1% hurricanes, 50% true
• Model B, 3% hurricanes, 50% true
• $100,000 home is insured, $2,000 is charged
• 2% chance of $98,000 loss, 98% chance of $2,000 gain
• Mean $0, standard deviation $14,000
![Page 28: Diversification of Parameter Uncertainty](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813a0d550346895da1e0af/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Period 2
• Premium from Bayes Theorem:
• Hurricane occurs: 75% Model B is correct, Premium = $2,500
• Hurricane doesn’t occur: 50.51% Model A is correct, Premium = $1,989.80
)Pr(
)()|Pr()|Pr(
A
BPRBAAB
![Page 29: Diversification of Parameter Uncertainty](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813a0d550346895da1e0af/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Means and Standard DeviationsPeriod 1 Period 2 Prob Premium Claims Cash Flow H H 0.0005 $ 2,500.00 $(100,000.00) $ (97,500.00) H N 0.0195 $ 2,500.00 $ - $ 2,500.00
N H 0.0195 $ 1,989.80 $(100,000.00) $ (98,010.20) N N 0.9605 $ 1,989.80 $ - $ 1,989.80
• Mean = $0, Standard Deviation = $13,999.82
• Standard Deviation is lower than the $14,000 that would occur in the absence of updating!
![Page 30: Diversification of Parameter Uncertainty](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813a0d550346895da1e0af/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Combine at 0% discounting
• Unambiguous: Sigma = $19,798.99. Losses are uncorrelated
• Ambiguous, but no Bayesian updating of premiums: Sigma = $19,849.93. Loss correlation is 0.0051
• Ambiguous with Bayesian updating of premiums: Sigma = $19,798.86. Loss correlation is 0, second period sigma is reduced!
• Implies LOWER risk premium for ambiguous multiperiod risks!
![Page 31: Diversification of Parameter Uncertainty](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813a0d550346895da1e0af/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Does this always work?
• Proof that correlation = 0 if premiums are fully Bayesian updated.
• Find the correlation between and for
• At time j, the Filtration F representing the time sequence of existence or lack of hurricanes through time j-1 is completely known. The Bayesian premium given F is set such that: and the expected value of the total payout is
iPO
jPO
ji
0| FPOE j
0Pr| F
j FFPOE
![Page 32: Diversification of Parameter Uncertainty](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813a0d550346895da1e0af/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Proof continued
• Since we have
• is a function only of F! Therefore:
because the first term in the sum is zero!• Because the covariance is 0, so is the
correlation
iPO
0 ji POEPOE
jiji POPOEPOPOCov ,
0Pr)(| F
ijji FFPOFPOEPOPOE
![Page 33: Diversification of Parameter Uncertainty](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813a0d550346895da1e0af/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Proof that variance at time i is less than that at time 1.
• is the probability of n hurricanes in periods 1 through i-1
• is the Bayesian updated probability of a hurricane in period i. This is also the Bayesian updated premium given n previous hurricanes.
• Variance of equals
nq
np
iPO
n
jjjj
n
jjjjjji ppqppppqPOE
00
222 )1()1()1(
![Page 34: Diversification of Parameter Uncertainty](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813a0d550346895da1e0af/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Proof Continued
• Where is the expected value of the Bayesian updated premium, which is also the probability of a hurricane in period 1.
• Now, as this is the variance of the Bayesian premium in period i. So:
n
jjj
n
jjjji pqpppqPOVar
0
2
0
)1(
p
02
0
2
ppqn
jjj
12
0
2 POVarpppqpPOVarn
jjji
![Page 35: Diversification of Parameter Uncertainty](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813a0d550346895da1e0af/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
More Pronounced with Profit/Risk Loading
• 15% Premium Loading makes mean value $300 in both periods. Standard Deviations are unchanged. Period 1 to Period 2 correlation drops below zero to -0.0008
• 100,000 scenarios for 100 years at 15% loading and 5% discount factor.
• Ambiguous with updating: Mean $6,054.97, Sigma $43,119.06
• Unambiguous: Mean $6,055.11, Sigma $43,119.06
![Page 36: Diversification of Parameter Uncertainty](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813a0d550346895da1e0af/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Bayesian Updating Limited by Regulators
• Worst case: NO premium increases allowed, full Bayesian decreases. Determine loading “L” to make NPV = 0 at 5%.
• Charge $2,000(1+L) in first period, and either $1,989.80(1+L) or $2,000(1+L) in the second.
• L solves for 0.0025 or ¼%
![Page 37: Diversification of Parameter Uncertainty](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813a0d550346895da1e0af/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Simulation of No Increases and Full Bayesian Decreases
• 100,000 scenarios, 100 years. EPV of premiums and claims at 5% are equal if the loading L equals 7.16%.
• Surprisingly small. Ambiguity and rate regulation appear unable to account for the high premiums charged by actuaries for ambiguous risks.
• Further Research: What if hurricane probabilities drift randomly with time?
![Page 38: Diversification of Parameter Uncertainty](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813a0d550346895da1e0af/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Conclusions
• When should ambiguity not be priced?• 1) One time game.• 2) Multiple Period games where choice of the
“side” of the contract to take is voluntary and chosen randomly.
• 3) Different types of ambiguous risks can be insured, with no correlation among the parameters of the distributions of different risks.
• 4) Multiple Period games with Bayesian updating (if anything, the price should be decreased slightly).
![Page 39: Diversification of Parameter Uncertainty](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813a0d550346895da1e0af/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
More Conclusions
• When is ambiguity aversion just risk aversion?• 1) Multiple Period games with only one type of
ambiguous risk with “side” taken being involuntary, and no updating of premiums (or updating limited by regulators)
• 2)Multiple types of ambiguous risks with correlation among the parameter realizations.
• 3) Could explain some part of the “equity premium puzzle”
• 4) Unlikely to explain large premiums suggested by actuaries for ambiguous risks.