Documentation and Architectural Interpretation of
the Panishail Temple Complex, Maulvibazar, Bangladesh.
Kawshik Saha*, Shamsul Arefin, Gourpada Dey
Department of Architecture, Shahjalal University of Science & Technology, Sylhet, Bangladesh
*Corresponding Author’s Email: [email protected]
Abstract
This article represents survey data of historical and architectural documentation of Sri Radha
Binod Ashrama locally known as the Panishail temple. Temple architecture is a common feature
of traditional religious architecture practice in Bangladesh. This article is a historical and
architectural investigation of a less known and mixed type of Hindu temple style in the Bengal
region. The Panishail temple complex has a collection of structures that include tomb, temples,
and residences aged between fifty to two hundred years. Over the ages, these heritage buildings
have displayed a unique architectural style of ancient Bengal and still serving as a living sacred
landscape heritage. However, like most of the ancient monuments of Bangladesh, Panishail
structures inside this complex stand against the threat of decay and anthropogenic destruction
with no effort to conserve them. There is a need for immediate action of research, exploration
and preservation to save this historic landmark. This research aims to investigate historic and
physical features of the temple complex through a systematic survey and documentation effort.
This research will lay a foundation for future conservation intervention on this site. Moreover,
this work will significantly contribute to historic temple architecture study in Bangladesh.
Keywords: Hindu Temples, Sacred landscape, Bhaishnavism, Conservation, Architectural
Documentation.
1. Introduction
Sylhet, the Northeastern region of Bangladesh, is often
referred to as the spiritual capital of this country.
Historically, Sylhet has been serving as a home of two
major religious streams of the Indian subcontinent,
‘Islam’ and ‘Hinduism’. Over the centuries, Sylhet
appeared as a major religious center of Northeast India
to contain spiritual values and spread these ideologies
through in the region [1]. This diversity of religious
streams has reflected in indigenous literature, music,
art, crafts, and mostly in architecture. Reasonably,
Sylhet and surrounding areas are home to several
Hindu temples that are rich in terms of heritage value
[2]. The Panishail temple complex has immense
importance in terms of architectural heritage and its
overall contribution as a religious institute.
Unfortunately, these ancient structures are in fragile
condition, threatening by various external factors and
requiring major conservation intervention. This
research aims to record this heritage site by
architectural documentation through developing
plans, elevation and 3d models. These documents will
lay a foundation for future conservation efforts on this
site. The authors have attempted a comparative study
of this temple features with temple architectural
features developed in Bangladesh. The authors expect
that this article will reach a wider range of researchers,
heritage experts, conservators, entrepreneurs. Besides,
this work will give a basis for future research or any
kind of intervention on this historic site. This study
will support the department of archaeology of
Bangladesh to further study and protect the group of
monuments as a national heritage.
2. The objective of the study:
Various international charters (Venice Charter,
Athens charter) and conservators have given
importance to proper documentation as a fundamental
need for conservation [3]. Proper documentation helps
to understand the structures and help to make correct
decisions. Hence, the primary objective of this
research was to make architectural documentation of
the existing buildings within the temple complex.
Second, to identify the heritage values of these
buildings by comparing and analyzing existing temple
architecture examples. This research also aimed to
inspect the structures to identify the major threats and
conservation needs of the structures. The authors also
discussed potential issues and directions for
sustainable preservation efforts that maybe be put in
place for this site.
Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 11 January 2021 doi:10.20944/preprints202101.0174.v1
© 2021 by the author(s). Distributed under a Creative Commons CC BY license.
. 2
3. Temple Architecture in Bangladesh: A
historical background
The region of Bengal is a geographical, historical,
cultural part of the Indian subcontinent. The modern-
day Bengal region is now divided into geographic
parts of Bangladesh, West Bengal, Jharkhand, parts of
Assam and Tripura [4]. In Bengal, Hinduism has been
practiced as one of the major religious streams which
are reflected through architectural history. Thus, a rich
heritage of temple architecture with distinctive styles
spread all over the Bengal region. Hindu temples in
the Bengal region inherit its legacy from prevailing
classical North Indian and South Indian style, with a
slight addition of local features. Unlikely to the
upward monumental scale of North Indian temples
and extensive decoration of Southern India, Bengal
temples are modest with their simple approach of
construction and rich integration to vernacular values.
As George Mitchell [5] stated ‘The Bengali temples
may be viewed as one of the most important
manifestations of the culture of this region, closely
associated with contemporary movements in religion,
literature and the arts as well as with broader political,
social and economic developments.’ Thus, Bengal
temples resemble as a cultural and political icon of
independence Bengal by showing deep association to
both Islamic and Hindu architecture of India [6]. The
combination of Islamic and Hindu architecture is an
intrinsic part of Bengal culture, which has also
reflected in Bengal temples [5]. Brick construction
techniques were one of the key features of Bengal
temple architecture. With an enormous demand for
material for large construction and scarcity of stone in
Bengal, intrigued by the choice of using clay as an
alternative building material [7]. Bangladesh, being
a part of the greater Bengal region, holds of a
considerable number of Hindu temples that could be
distinctly featured as Bengal temple style. Throughout
time, a wide range of styles has emerged in terms of
style with differentiable features. Based on David
McCutchion’s [6,8,9] notable work on Bengal temple
architecture classification, temples in Bangladesh can
be arranged in three phases:
i. Development of ancient temples till the 12th
Century.
ii. Sultanate period from the 14th century till late 16th
iii. Hindu revivals from the 16th to 19th centuries.
The earlier temples belong to ancient dynasties of
Pala, Jain or Buddhist. Few notable temples of this
stage are the Shiddheswar temple of Bankura,
Pakhbirra Temple, Purulia [10]. Earlier temples
adopted the Nagara style of North India temples.
There is not much evidence of early medieval temples
found in Bangladesh. Perween Hasan [11] assumed
that long time impact of local climate, the
impermanence of brick, river erosion may have caused
the disappearance of these early temples. Based on
limited pieces of evidence, these ancient temples are
classified as the Vadra type, the Rekha type, the Stupa
type and the tiered type [8,9].
After the establishment of the Islamic Bengal
Sultanate on the 13th century, the distinct style of
Bengal temple architecture began to flourish in the
Sultanate period. During this era, construction
techniques like domes and arches were mixed with
Bengal vernacular culture of curved cornice from
village huts. Muslim patrons developed a taste of
covering wall surfaces with terracotta plaques made
from clay [12]. Historian Hitesranjan Sanyal states
that the Bengal Sultanate was established by defying
the imperial authority of Delhi. This isolation
triggered a distinct style of Bengal architecture
inspired by regional identity, indigenous culture and
local environment [13]. This is the period when
Bengal's religious architecture, including temples,
developed as an Independent regional style of Indian
architecture. Bengal temples adopted thatched folk
elements like Chala, (distinct roofing style of Bengal
hut) as major architectural elements [13]. Besides,
Ratna type temples emerged with a pinnacle roof on
top. At the later phase of his period, Hindu temples
were more inspired by Orissan style temples where
massive curvilinear towers dominated the structure as
a roof called Shikhara.
From the 16th to 19th centuries, the temple
architecture of Bengal showed the highest pick of
evolution and experiments in terms of style. The
Hindu revival of art and culture was influenced by the
philosophy of Sree Chaitanya, who popularized
worshipping Radha-Krishna as a modern cult [14].
During the 16th to 17th century, numerous richly
decorated temples were built as Radha-Krishna
temples [8]. Thus temple architecture in Bengal
emerged as a symbol of society and cultural
prosperity. The curved cornice Chala temples and Jor-
Bangla temples are common types found in this period
[9].
During the 18th century, the rise of Zamindar culture
triggered temples construction in Bengal as it was
considered as social pride. During this period, with a
continuation of previous styles, new styles emerged as
Ek-Bangla, At-Chala, Ek-Ratna, Pancha-Ratna,
Nava-Ratna, Dolmancha, and Rashmancha [8]. These
temples are mixed with Bengal hut and Islamic style.
After the British occupation of Bengal in the mid-18th
century, temple forms were highly driven by European
taste [9]. Gothic spires were introduced as temple
roofs. During this period, tall Matha architecture
gained very popularly with their stiffly decorated
pinnacles. According to Parween Hasan [11], the
fashion of extending Spire in the prevailing Ratna type
temples were often taken from Christian churches.
Besides, temples with flat roof Dalan types,
Rasmancha and Dolmancha types emerged as a
popular choice. Temples of Puthia rajbari in Rajshahi
district, are a major example of this period.
Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 11 January 2021 doi:10.20944/preprints202101.0174.v1
. 3
3. Historical background of Panishail temple:
3.1. Location
The Panishail temple complex is popularly named
after its location in the village of Panishail. Panishail
is a remote rural suburb area near Sylhet-Maulvibazar
highway (Latitude 24.643827 ° and longitude
91.916940 °) [15]. The location is situated almost 26
km from the city center (Fig. 1). Settled in a country
area, the temple site is surrounded by agricultural land,
natural canals and informal settlements. A small
village market, also named after the temple called
Akhara Bazar (Market near the temple), which
highlights the importance of this temple to the
adjacent community.
3.2. Construction history
For the lack of written documents, the exact history of
the temple complex was difficult to reconstruct. It
was, therefore, necessary for the authors to focus more
on oral information from residents and local Hershey.
However, the inscriptions on a few tombs also indicate
the actual information on the construction period. The
Panishail temple was founded by Shantaram
Goswami, a migrant priest from the western part of
Bengal who settled here between 1730 and 1740 AD.
After a few years of living here, a good number of
local inhabitants became his followers [16].
Afterward, Shantaram Goswami received a vast area
as a 'Divine Property' from local Nawab where he
founded this temple.
In terms of socio-religious significance, for years, the
Panishail temple complex is serving as a major sub-
center to preach Bhaishnavism in the Sylhet region
[17]. Bhaishnavism is a major philosophic stream of
Hinduism, which is a relatively popular religious
concept in the greater Sylhet region [18]. It is assumed
that Shantaram Goswami spent his past life in the
famous Bithangal Akhara (located at Habiganj
district) as a devotee. Bithangal Akhara is one of the
major centers of Bhaishnavism to preach Bhaishnava
philosophy in Northeastern Bengal [19]. Shantaram
Goswami, being profoundly influenced by the
socialist concept of Bhaishnavism, founded the
Panishail complex as a school of thought. At present,
the temple is occupied by a community of devotees
headed by the Guru (senior priest) who is the
philosophic ancestor of Shantaram Goswami. The
religious scholarship is handed over from generation
to generation as a continuation of the philosophic
practice. The temple used to run by the generous help
of locals and pilgrims. While the declining number of
followers made it difficult to survive, the temple has
now adopted a community-based approach to
governance and maintenance of the temple premises.
Each year, devotees arrange a series of religious
events in the complex, such as Durga Puja,
Janmashtami, Sri kirtan, which attracts thousands of
pilgrims from all over Bangladesh.
4. Methodology
Architectural documentation is a systematic process
of recording all relevant historical and functional
information on heritage buildings. International
charters (Athens Charter, Venice Charter) and
conservation experts have given importance of
documentation as a key phase for the identification
and conservation of heritage structures [20,21].
Architectural documentation is a dynamic and time-
consuming process requiring sufficient knowledge
and technical support. Often, implementing low-cost
documentation techniques is more feasible and
efficient [22]. For this research, authors adopted a
participatory, low-tech and low-cost method of
architectural documentation. As a part of regular
academic work, a team of teachers and architecture
students carried out the field survey and data
documentation (Fig. 2). With a notion of engaging
youth to promote conservation awareness and
learning, this research included few external
volunteers. The survey team surveyed the entire
complex in a series of academic field works for data
collection. Since there was a lack of secondary data,
authors had to rely mostly on oral interviews. Primary
data collection methods include field survey, visual
observation, oral interview, experts’ opinion. In the
second stage of the research survey data were
graphically reproduced and analyzed. The authors
Figure 1 Location of Panishail temple. (Reproduced from
google earth.)
Figure 2 Students are participating in data collection and
measurement.( Photograph by authors)
Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 11 January 2021 doi:10.20944/preprints202101.0174.v1
. 4
applied a comparative method to interpret the
architectural style of the historic structures. Later,
major conservation threats were detected through
visual inspection of the structures. Fig. 3 shows step
wards methods carried out in this research.
4.1 Methodological steps:
Surveying and documentation of heritage buildings
require a scientific methodological process to achieve
the desired conservation outcome. Many international
and national agencies have their recommendations and
guidelines for heritage documentation and survey
methods. For this research, authors have adopted the
heritage recording guidelines proposed by Historic
England. This Historic England guidance sets out the
process of investigating and recording historic
buildings for historical understanding [23]. Besides,
the authors followed another source of guidelines
written by architecture conservationist Bob Hill [24].
Based on the guidelines, the following interventions
were made in different phases (Fig. 3) :
i) Documentary research:
The first phase of the Sylhet region study contents
archival research which explores the socio-cultural
and political influences behind the temple
construction. A bibliographic survey of existing
literature followed this study to get a better insight into
the context and historical background.
ii) Historical Oral Survey:
Owing to the lack of adequate literature, oral historical
research played a crucial role in recording the history
of the background. Oral testimony of users in
architectural research can make an important
contribution to building the building history [25].
iii) Photographic recording:
Photographic documentation plays a crucial role in
architectural documentation. Photographs are a
powerful way to capture data more precisely. In this
phase of the survey, researchers carried out a full
photographic survey of the site. The photographs
included building elevations, interiors, architectural
details, landscape elements in colored images. The
photographs were recorded in RAW format that can
allow future modification.
iv) Visual observation and hand sketching:
In this phase, the survey team walked through the
project and observed individual monuments to
identify the architectural elements. First, every
structure of the complex was visually assessed from
both exterior and interior. Then initial hand drawings
were prepared for a preliminary discussion. A group
of students was assigned to each structure to make
preliminary sketches of form and elements. These
handmade sketches allow the researchers to have a
better understating of the building and their scale.
iv) Measured survey:
After observation and hand sketching, measurement
data were collected by a physical survey of the site
area and individual structures. The structures were
surveyed with measuring tools, and the measurements
were written on the hand-sketched drawings. The
measured survey included the whole complex with
vegetation, building locations, plans, section and
elevations.
v) Reproduction of drawings:
The measurement data from a physical survey were
reproduced in computer-aided design software. The
CAD drawings include the master plan of the site,
individual building plans, elevation, sections and
details. Moreover, researchers adopted
photogrammetry [26] method in a limited scope to
compare the survey drawings for better accuracy. In
this method, photogrammetry data were juxtaposed
with physical survey data to get better precision for
architectural drawings.
vi) Report and Archiving:
Finally, the data were further discussed, analyzed,
documented and archived for presentation and
dissemination. A survey report documented all data,
drawings, analysis and proposals. All Photographs and
CAD drawings were stored in digital format.
4.2 Data collection tools:
Tools and techniques for architectural documentation,
surveying and recording are diverse and complicated.
Usually, the selection of proper tools depends on the
expected intervention outcome of the project. Hence,
tools used for an academic research purpose may
differ from archeological intervention and more
technical structural diagnosis of historic sites [27]. For
this particular study, the authors adopted a set of basic,
low-tech surveying tools that can be easily used by
research participants. As a method, metric surveying
and documentation techniques were applied. For a
physical survey of site and structures, direct
measuring tools like tape measures, levels and total
Figure 3 Methodological stages and chronological activities
in the research.
Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 11 January 2021 doi:10.20944/preprints202101.0174.v1
. 5
station theodolites were used. Indirect measuring
techniques like 3d scanner, radiography,
thermography was avoided as they required expertise
and expensive equipment. For digital documentation,
computer-aided drafting software has been used.
Photographs were taken with DSLR cameras. For 3d
modeling of the structure, authors used Google sketch
up software as a tool.
5. Result: Components of the Panishail
Temple complex
5.1 Planning and zoning system
The Panishail temple complex results from the gradual
development of last two hundred and fifty years.
Through this period, the authors identified five phases
of development. The Sreemandir (central shrine) was
the first structure constructed on this site. Therefore,
the remaining structures were placed by the location
and orientation of this key monument. Allocation of
other structures shows a logical connection between
functions of a typical Bhaishnava (a philosophic
stream of Hinduism) temple expressing functionality
and simplicity. The double entrance tires isolate the
complex from the highway. A Lion gate on the
entrance welcomes the pilgrims and visitors.
Approximately thirty structures of different functions,
styles and ages can be seen here. As the master plan
(Fig. 4), the complex can be divided into two distinct
areas, the east side temple and the west side. Each of
the two complexes has a similar zoning pattern where
Sreemandir is treated as the central monument. Each
complex comprises a group of buildings dedicated to
a specific religious function. For instance, Sreemandir
is the central shrine worshipping Lord Krishna (one of
the major Hindu Gods) inside it. Sreemandir is
surrounded by other supporting functions like Nata
Mandir (a performance hall), Dolmancha (a distinct
ritual place for worshiping Lord Krishna) and Jhulan
Mandir (a festival venue). Besides, the Bhakta Nibasa
was built to provide accommodation for devotees and
the Bhog Mandir to prepare food for rituals.
Mausoleum tombs, known as Matha, is one of the
notable features of this temple complex.
Approximately twenty numbers of Mathas were found
on the site. Out of them, four Mathas are in a ruined
state where others need major restoration. The
planning of Panishail temple complex follows a
simple functional zoning system commonly used in
most of Bengal Bhaishnava temples. Structures are
allied regarding their functions, following a sequence
from the public to private.
5.2 The Sreemandir: The Central Temple
The Sreemandir at the western side of the complex is
south facing. The rectangular chamber of Sreemandir
has three parts where the middle one contains the
adobe of God Krishna, known as the Garbhagriha
(central womb). This Garbhagriha chamber is
featured with a typical Bengal style Chau-Chala (four-
Figure 4 Master plan of Panishail Complex. (Graphics by Authors)
Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 11 January 2021 doi:10.20944/preprints202101.0174.v1
. 6
part roof) with a projected flat-roofed semi-outdoor
(Fig. 5). This projected semi-outdoor space is
decorated with four columns and five circular arches,
which act as the entrance to the central chamber.
Sreemandir is a brick and lime masonry building with
symmetrically arranged plan and elevation. However,
Chau-Chala roof is made of traditional lime mortar
concrete and the entire temple was covered with
modern cement plaster during a renovation. The
Sreemandir of the Eastside Complex is a flat roof
temple with three arched semi-outdoor rooms. The
structural system of the Sreemandir follows traditional
construction techniques of Bengal Islamic
Architecture. This is entirely a brick masonry structure
with 20 inch thick brick walls holding the roof. The
projected roof of semi-outdoor is supported by four 17
inch x 17 inch brick columns. The internal ceiling
feature shows use of Chala type vault. Traditional
lime mortar technique have been employed as
adhesive element. Walls are covered with lime
plastering. The authors found this structure in good
shape with minor requirement of restoration.
5.3 The Nata Mandir: The Performing hall
The Nata Mandir is a key part of the Bhaishnava
temple. Mythically, this is a cultural performing space
to worship God by offering dance and music [26]. This
is a common feature of Hindu temple architecture to
place Nata Mandir very next to the Sreemandir.
Hence, in the Panishail temple complex, the Nata
Mandir in the east part of the complex faces
Sreemandir with a linear circulation path in between.
At present, there is no evidence of this Nata Mandir as
it was demolished a few years back. The old Nata
mandir was replaced by a tin-roofed temporary hall.
But Nata Mandir of the westside complex is still in
good shape. This is a European-style flat roof building
next to the East Sreemandir (Fig. 6). This is a less
decorated brick-lime masonry structure. Following the
structural techniques of British colonial India, the
Nata Mandir features a large semi-outdoor hall with I-
section iron beam and round arches (Fig. 6). The walls
are 27 inch thick and covered with lime plaster.
During visual inspection, author didn’t find any many
issues , so this building seemed well maintained.
5.4 The Bhakta Nibas: The residence for devotees.
Bhakta Nibas is a permanent residence for devotees
who have been staying in this complex for years.
Devotees are caretakers of this temple responsible to
perform a daily ritual for God Krishna and organize
annual religious festivals. Both residences in the
western and eastern parts of the complex have adopted
similar architectural styles, except for construction
techniques. Buildings are consciously placed in a
north-south direction to provide a buffer between the
temple and other structures. Bhakta Nibas (Fig. 7)has
direct visual and physical access to Bhog Mandir, Sree
Mandir and Nata Mandir through semi-outdoor space.
From structural point of view, this building features
similar techniques of brick masonry and I-section iron
beams. Columns are used to carry roof of semi-
outdoor space. Southern part of this linear building is
severely ruined which requires major restoration.
Figure 5 Shreemandir on the west part of Complex. (Graphics by Authors)
Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 11 January 2021 doi:10.20944/preprints202101.0174.v1
. 7
corridor. The pyramid shaped Dolmancha is supported
Figure 7 Bhakta Nibas of West Side Temple. (Graphics by Authors)
Figure 8 Dolmancha of West part temple. (Graphics reproduced by Authors)
Figure 6 Bhogmandir ,Sree Mandir and Nata Mandir of East part temple . (Graphics by Authors)
Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 11 January 2021 doi:10.20944/preprints202101.0174.v1
. 8
5.5 The Dolmancha : The stage for a specific
festival
Bhakta Nibas on the east side is a flat-roofed The
Dolmancha is one of the emblematic structures of the
Panishail complex due to its unique architectural style.
This house is used as the adobe of Lord Krishna at the
Dol Festival. Dolmancha of the western side of the
temple is a three-story building whose stories are
dwindling upward to form a pyramid shape. (Fig 8).
The ground floor was 29 ft x 29 ft and contains a
narrow stairway leading to the top floor of
Dolmancha. Each story is surrounded by an arched
colonial-style building with a semi-outdoor elongated
by a central structural core. This core is a combination
of thick brick walls and columns (fig 7) which also
supports the ascending stair. The external walls of the
ground floor is decorated with blind arcading and false
columns. The structural techniques are similar to the
Sreemandir, entirely made with traditional brick-lime
masonry. During site visits, this structure was seen
under a restoration process by temple authority.
Without the involvement of any conservation expert,
few faulty measures were taken while restoring the
structure. For example, lime plasters were replaced
with cement-sand plasters, old decorative elements
were removed to install newly designed ones.
5.6 The Mathas: The Mausoleum Tombs
As mentioned earlier, the mausoleum tombs known as
Mathas are the most emblematic monuments of the
Panishail temple complex. A total of 20 full-scale
Mathas and 7 Bhandari tombs were identified inside
the premises (Fig. 9). Most of the tombs are standing
on a high plinth, but some Mathas are attached to a
common base. Traditionally, in Bhaishnaba's
philosophy, when a saint breathes his last, his
followers always bury him in a particular posture
known as the Samadhi. Each Matha is built on the
Samadhi, the burial ground of a saint. A series of
Mathas was built in the Panishail temple complex over
the years, after the death of each head saint of the
complex. Besides, a miniature tomb known as the
Bhandari tomb is placed next to each Matha.
Metaphorically, a Bhandari tomb is a memorial to the
corresponding Guru's wife. The Sharavuja
Mahaprovu (a figurative form of God) is placed inside
the chamber of the tomb as a representation of the late
Guru (Fig 9). Based on physical appearance and
construction techniques, The Mathas could be
classified into three groups. The first groups of Mathas
are the oldest ones with very simple ornamentation
and modest outlook. The octagonal thick brick
masonry walls are covered with a corbelled roof. The
roof edges are visible and form a curvilinear
projection. These forms are plastered with lime
plastering. The second group of Mathas has a more
decorated surface with round archways and columns.
These brick masonry walls are covered with a conical
corbeled roof. The roof corners are hidden by arched
details of the surface. The third group of Mathas has
been constructed later period. The Radha Raman and
The Sitanath Mathas are newly built tombs with
modern post lintel structure. These tombs have
ambulatory space surrounding the chamber.
Reinforced concrete techniques have been employed.
Structures are covered with sand-cement plaster. The
central chambers are covered with octagonal slopped
Figure 8 Different types of Mathas of the Temple complex. (Photograph taken by Authors)
Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 11 January 2021 doi:10.20944/preprints202101.0174.v1
. 9
roof made out of concrete. Old Mathas placed on the
Southern part of the complex are in a ruined state than
Northern tombs. The foundations and entry porches
are ruined. Most of the tombs are effected by growing
vegetation and moss on the wall and roof surfaces.
6. Discussion:
6.1 Panishail temple as a synthesis of architectural
styles
The first Sreemandir of the Panishail temple complex
was built between 1770 CE and 1780 CE. Since then
several structures were added one after the other for
the next two hundred years to form the complex. The
structures were built under the supervision of various
generations of religious saints and designed by local
masons. Instead of posing a particular style, the
architecture of the Panishail temple comprises mixed
elements of the prevalent Bengal architectural style.
Individual monuments are hybrids of different
components of the Indian temple style blended with
Bengal styles, such as the Bengal Sultanat period,
Mughal architecture and British colonial style (fig 9).
Eventually, this makes the Panishail temple complex
as an inventory of Bengal architectural heritage. The
architecture of Panishail shows how various iconic
designs, construction techniques have been locally
adopted into craftsmanship, traditional skills and
vernacular concepts of small-scale building. Based on
architectural principles, the Panishail temple complex
can be characterized by two distinctive design
approaches. One group includes Krishna temples with
Nata Mandir on the front, complemented by
Dolmancha and Jhulan Mandir. The second group
comprises mortuary tombs known as the Mathas (Fig.
9). The first group of structures are traditional
examples of Bhaishnava temples known as Akhara,
which are commonly practiced archetypes in the
Bengal region.
Sreemandir is a rectangle planned temple connected to
the front of a semi-outdoor veranda. The central
chamber Garbhagriha holds the adobe of God
Krishna. Sreemandir is connected to a wide semi-
outdoor hall called the Natamandir. The ChauChala
roof crowning the Garbhagriho with its projected
semi outdoors (Fig. 5) depicts its influence from the
local huts of the Bengal region. It is a transformation
of the vernacular Bengal hut into a Bhaishnava
temple. However, the outer shell is decorated with
Mughal details like blind windows, brick screen wall
and floral cornice motifs (Fig 13).
As it was mentioned earlier, the east side of the temple
complex was constructed much later than the west
side. This part of temple form is featured with
architectural elements of colonial India, including flat
roof, semi-circular arches, plaster covering, an I-
section iron beams, less ornamentation (Fig 6). This
temple style has been categorized as a flat-roof type or
Dalan type temple style by historians [29]. Besides,
the east side of Bhakta Nibas is a linear brick masonry
structure with a projected semi-outdoor, which is a
good example of a hybrid of British colonial style and
local vernacular archetypes (fig 7).
One of the notable structures of the Panishail temple
complex is the three-storied Dolmancha (Fig 8). Built-
Figure 9 Chronological evolution of Matha form with time.(Graphics by authors)
Figure 10 Narrow Connection between spaces: Pedestrian
Experience. (Photographs by Authors)
Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 11 January 2021 doi:10.20944/preprints202101.0174.v1
. 10
in receding stories on a square plan, the shape of
Dolmancha is very similar to the temple of Puthia
Rajbari located in the district of Rajshahi (Fig12). It is
understood that the Dolmancha in Panishail is inspired
by Dolmancha in Puthia, a descendant of the famous
Pancha Mahala of Fatehpur Sikri in North India [28].
This structure also features details inspired from
classical Hindu and Islamic Architecture.
The Mausoleum tombs or Mathas are key elements of
Panishail temple, contributing to the unique
morphological character of this heritage site (fig 9).
Octagonal planned single chamber Mathas are
crowned with a Shikhara type roof (octagonal Chala)
with a top finial. These matha-style temples are
commonly seen in the late 18th or 19th century
temples, which are thought to be influenced by
Bengal, Islamic and European styles [29]. The first
two tombs in Panishail are clearly inspired from
curvilinear roof and Chala style. Shantaram tomb, the
first one built in Panishail, bears a resemblance to the
octagonal Chala Shiva temple (Fig 12) in the
Jhenaidah district, with a curvilinear cornice and a
pointed conical roof. There is, however, a shift of style
that can be seen in the later-constructed Mathas (fig
10). In these structures, the projected cornices were
replaced by the decorative arch pilasters of the tomb
Figure 11 Classical references from Bengal, Islamic & European architecture used in Panishail temple. Structures
constructed in different time line indicates different styles and construction techniques.(Prepared by authors)
Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 11 January 2021 doi:10.20944/preprints202101.0174.v1
. 11
walls and the roofs were transformed into a more
geometric conical shape. Pilaster details are inspired
by European style. However, few tombs are decorated
with Mughal Shajahani arch and columns (Fig 13).
The Matha of Saint Radha Mohan and Shitanath are
constructed recently. So these structures are modern
looking with RCC framing with ambulatory semi
outdoors. Despite of architectural styles, Mathas share
a common octagonal planning system and solid load-
bearing wall system with no window. The Matha
structures of Panishail temple are a good example of
how structural techniques and visual style have
transformed over time (Fig 10). Since the tombs are
constructed in different phases, they exhibit a
chronological evolution of Matha architecture in
Bengal context (Fig10).
Figure 12 Comparison of Panishail Temple structures with Temple classification by David McCutchion . This graphics
shows that elements of Panishail are inspired from various temple types. (Reproduced by Authors)
Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 11 January 2021 doi:10.20944/preprints202101.0174.v1
. 12
One of the major objectives of this research was to
interpret the architectural significances of the
Panishail temple concerning Bengal temple heritage.
As a method, the authors undertook a comparative
analysis of architectural elements. The drawings and
photographs prepared from site survey data were
compared with classical examples of temple heritage.
Therefore, after surveying the structures based on their
architectural style, a graphical comparison has been
attempted by authors (fig 12). The pictorial
classification of Bengal temple architecture used in
this figure is adopted from David McCutchion’s
widely accepted study on Bengal temples. Hence, after
correlating with the classification, this can be seen that
the formal expression of Panishail temple elements
resemblance with various temple styles of
Bangladesh. Authors have developed a list of visual
indicators which belong to a different phase of temple
styles. Fig 13 shows the list of indicators regarding
various phases of the Bengal temple style. Fig 12 and
fig 13 depict that Panishail temple complex is a
synthesis of various architectural styles formed in the
Bengal region from classic to modern period.
6.2 A thoughtful place-making of spirituality
In the master plan, Mathas were placed side by side to
creating a longitudinal perspective on the eyes of the
observer. Moreover, the monolithic scale of the
Mathas, with projected Shikharas towards the sky,
symbolizes the relationship between heaven and life
through soul purification and inner devotion. Besides,
the Panishail temple complex indicates the intention
of making a logical connection of ritual spaces
through public movements (Fig. 11). When wandering
through the temple site, gradually unfolding spaces
create a sense of curiosity. The spaces provide an
implied scale for the pilgrims, which reflected the
down to earth and altruistic approach of the
Bhaishnava temples. This place is more than a temple,
but a household to live with the god of Krishna and
make a path to heaven by devotion and self-
development (Fig. 9). Panishail is a simple example of
how architecture can content spirituality and convey
the essence through form and space to the devotees.
Moreover, the inter-dialogue between built forms and
natural landscape creates a peaceful serenity in which
the perceiver can listen to the whisper of nature and
the Holy Spirit. The place where the Panishail temple
was performed reveals an important spatial
representation of spirituality, inspired by the essence
of Bhaishnavism. Hence, the late medieval Bengal
temple style has been blended with the Bhaishnavism
sense of place. The conventional monumental
approach of temple design was deliberately replaced
by a low-scale, down to earth, anti-monumental
approach. This approach is profoundly inspired by the
Socialistic view of Bhaishnavism. In the Panishail
complex, a marvelously synthesized style of
architecture is seen, where Bengal classical
architecture harmonizes with vernacular spirit and
rural cultural landscape.
6.3 Assessment of the structural systems, physical
condition and conservation needs:
The authors carried out a visual inspection survey of
existing structures to identify potential threats to the
physical condition. Over time, most of the Panishail
temple complex structures experienced actions from
both natural and human-induced sources that caused
damage to the structures. Brick-lime masonry
structural work fairly caused the building to be
vulnerable to current climatic conditions with heavy
rainfall and high humidity. One of the major threats
identified by the authors is the growth of vegetation
and moss on the surface of the buildings. Sylhet is an
area of heavy rainfall all year round, which creates an
appropriate condition for the rapid growth of organic
substances on the structures (Fig. 11). Wall-born
cracks, deterioration of building components are
another danger which is destroying the structures. The
absence of regulatory maintenance and sufficient
conservation awareness is the primary cause of the
fragility of the structures. The inappropriate alteration,
modulation of old structures for so-called
maintenance, without prior knowledge of
conservation, is another threat to the future survival of
this complex. To get more technically accurate
conservation issues, a proper structural diagnosis is
required by involving experts. Based on preliminary
visual inspection, the authors suggest the following
conservation recommendations for the structures:
i. Few structures are in a severe stage of destruction
and need immediate structural stabilization. The
Dolmancha, Bhakta nibas of the east side, Tombs of
Shantaram, Ram Mohan, Ram Govinda are key
buildings that need proper structural repairing work.
ii. Over time, lime mortar plasters on structures were
replaced with cement sands. This caused major
damage to the internal brick wall. The cement plaster
Figure 13 Physical condition and threats on the
structures. (Graphics reproduced by Authors)
Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 11 January 2021 doi:10.20944/preprints202101.0174.v1
. 13
needs to be removed and restored with traditional lime
mortar.
iii. Vegetation, moss, biological substances grown
over structures should be removed with hands,
brushing and chemical biocides where necessary.
Regular monitoring of structures is needed to avoid
unnecessary vegetation growth. This is important to
apply water repellent and waterproof coating masonry
surface area.
iv. Improper alteration of architectural details and
motifs is a major problem of this site. Without
involving experts, these changes are often done by
local builders. These details should be removed and
replaced with authentic ones.
v. One of the major problems of Panishail temple
structures is dampness and unwanted moisture inside
structures. Appropriate conservation measures
techniques are required to avoid moisture damping.
For example, the foundation of the structure need to
isolate from rainwater, wall plasters need to be
replaced with lime mortar to let the wall to breathe.
The ventilation facility needs to be installed where
needed, the exterior wall needs to seal with damp-
proof material. Need to apply a regular maintenance
procedure to eliminate standing water and vegetative
threats to building/site
vi. Landscape and Environment is one of the major
element of Panishail temple site. An ecological survey
of sites and surroundings is required. The conservation
plans should include an environmental management
plan including flora and fauna to preserve the visual
integrity.
vii. A proper drainage system needs to install in the
complex. Water clogging because of heavy rainfall
makes damage to the building foundation. Every
structure needs to be connected with a central
rainwater management system.
viii. Sylhet is located in an earthquake-prone area and
special measures should be taken for seismic
protection of the individual structures. Adopting
preventive conservation measures may help the
structures from severe damage from earthquakes.
7. Conclusions and recommendations:
From the above discussion on Panishail temple
heritage, authors have come with few conclusive
points. First, the Panishail temple possesses
substantial heritage values in terms of social, cultural,
scientific, architectural significances. The history of
this complex is deeply associated with the socio-
political history of the Sylhet region. Hence, the lack
of historic shreds of evidence should be covered by
more intensive historic research on this site. Second,
the Panishail temple complex showcases a range of
temple styles in terms of architecture and construction
techniques. From medieval to modern, this historic
site is a unique inventory of temple heritage where
diversity nested inside a limited geographic boundary.
Third, this historic site is a major source of intangible
cultural values connected to local communities. This
living heritage site is a center of local myths, religious
gospels, devotional songs, festivals. Besides
architectural conservation, equal importance should
be given to document and preserve these intangible
cultural heritage elements. Community-based
preservation by education and training the local
community would be useful. Finally, the stunning
scenic beauty of the site surroundings gives an added
value to this heritage site. This site and surroundings
can emerge as a potential tourism spot by ensuring
tourism facilities.
Transcending time and space, good architecture
remains communicative and interactive all the while
through its spatial qualities [30]. Temple complex of
Panishail is a good example of this place making
where architecture is a mediator between spirituality
and self-consciousness. Moreover, this is a widely
characterized cultural landscape where interaction
among nature, architecture and people has created a
living heritage. This research was an attempt to put a
light on this forgotten part of the history and heritage
of the Sylhet region. But there is a lot of work to be
done. This heritage site requires more assessment of
the structures and community identification and
promotion of cultural elements and to develop a
sustainable conservation policy. These interventions
can have a positive impact on the existing heritage and
community development. Authors expect that
responsible government agencies, institutes, will take
steps to carry further research and conservation
activities to save this heritage site.
Acknowledgment
The authors are acknowledging the 2011-12 session
students of the department of architecture, SUST for
their generous effort in the data collection activities.
References
[1] A. C. Choudhury, Sreehatter Itibrita. Sylhet:
Utso Prakashan, 1910.
[2] M. D. Gupta, Srehatter Itihas. Dhaka: Utso
Prakashan, 2009.
[3] ICOMOS, Principles for the recording of
monuments, groups of buildings, 1996.
[4] D. C. Sen, History of Bengal: From ancient times
to 1757. Kolkata: Dey’s Publishing, 1995.
[5] G. Michell, Historical Background, in Brick
Temples of Bengal -From the Archives of David
McCutchion. New Jersey, Princeton University
Press , 1983.
Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 11 January 2021 doi:10.20944/preprints202101.0174.v1
. 14
[6] P. Mangaonkar, Temples of Bengal: Material
Style and Technological Evolution,Chitrolekha
International Magazine on Art and Design, vol.
1, no. 2, 2012.
[7] N. Ahmed, Architectural Development in
Bangladesh. In Regionalism in Architecture, in
Concept Media/Aga Khan Award for
Architecture. Singapore, 1985.
[8] D. J. McCutchion, Late medieval Temples of
Bengal Origin and Classification. Calcutta: The
Asiatic Society, 1972.
[9] B. Ahmed and N. Chowdhury, Selected Hindu
temples of Bangladesh. Dhaka: UNESCO, 2005.
[10] S. Guha and A. Bandyopadhyay, Terracotta
Temples of Bengal: A Culmination of Pre-
existing Architectural Styles, Chitrolekha
International Magazine on Art and Design.2017,
vol. 2, no. 1, 2017.
[11] P. Hasan, Reflection on Early Temples Form of
Eastern India, Journal of Bengal Art, vol. 2, pp.
211-212, 1997.
[12] P. Mangaonkar, Terracotta Temples of
Bishnupur: Transformation through Time and
Technology, Chitrolekha International Magazine
on Art and Design, vol. 1, no. 2, 2012.
[13] H. Sanyal, Religious Architecture in Bengal
(15th-17th century) : A study of the major trends,
in Proceedings of the Indian History Congress,
1970.
[14] A. Majumdar, Caitanya: His Life and Doctrine.
A Study in Vaisnavism. Bombay: Bharatiya
Vidya Bhavan, 1969.
[15] M. Haque, The History of Rajnagar. Sylhet:
Center For Bangladesh Research, 2000.
[16] S. A. Das, Interviewee, [Interview]. 10June
2018.
[17] M. R. Mujib, Itar Itihas. Sylhet: Desh Darpan,
1994.
[18] S. Rosen, Indian's spiritual renaissance: The life
and times of Lord Chaitanya. Calcutta: South
Asia Books, 1989.
[19] S. Ahmed, Bithangal Bara Akhara. 2013.
[Online].Available:www.bangla.bdnews24.com/
glitz/article613761.bdnews. [Accessed 10 July
2020].
[20] ICOMOS, International Council on Monuments
& Sites. 1994.www.ICOMOS.com[Accessed 10
July 2020].
[21] ICOMOS, International charter for the
conservation and restoration of monuments and
sites (the Venice charter 1964). ICOMOS, 1964.
[22] F. Hassani and M. Raffie, An Experience in
cultural Heritage Documentation in Iran, Remote
Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences. 2013.
[23] H. England, Understanding Historic Buildings:
A Guide to Good Recording Practice.
Gloucestershire: Historic England, 2006.
[24] B. Hill, Undertaking historic building surveys —
An effective approach, Journal of Building
Appraisal, vol. 1, pp. 317-330, 2005.
[25] B. Marley, The use of Oral and Documentary
Sources in Historical Archaeology: Ethnohistory
at the Mott Farm, Ethnohistory, vol. 20, no. 4, pp.
347-360, 1973.
[26] J. A. Fidler, Overview of diagnostic indirect
tools for conservation. Report, 2016.
[27] S. Halder and M. Halder, Temple Architecture of
Bengal. Dhaka: Urbee Prakashan, 2011.
[28] N. Ahmed and A. Hussain, in Cultural Survey of
Bangladesh Survey. Dhaka, Asiatic Society of
Bangladesh, 2007.
[29] A. Ahmed and S. Z. Hossain, Mosque
architecture in Bangladesh. Paris: UNESCO,
2006.
[30] Y. Pandey, Concept of Space in traditional
Indian Architecture. Ahmedabad: Ahmedabad
Mapin Publication, 2013.
Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 11 January 2021 doi:10.20944/preprints202101.0174.v1