Transcript
Page 1: Dretske, Fred. Conclusive Reasons

8/23/2019 Dretske, Fred. Conclusive Reasons

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dretske-fred-conclusive-reasons 1/23

 This article was downloaded by:[University of Toronto][University of Toronto]

On: 11 May 2007Access Details: [subscription number 769429897]Publisher:RoutledgeInforma Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3J H, UK 

Australasian J ournal of PhilosophyPublication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information:http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/title~content=t713659165

Conclusive reasonsFred Dretske

a

aUniversity of Wisconsin.

 To cite this Article: Fred Dretske , 'Conclusive reasons ', Australasian J ournal of Philosophy, 49:1, 1 - 22 To link to this article: DOI: 10.1080/00048407112341001URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00048407112341001

PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE

Full terms and conditions of use: http://www.informaworld.com/terms-and-conditions-of-access.pdf 

 This articlemaybe usedfor research, teaching and private study purposes. Any substantial orsystematic reproduction,re-distribution, re-selling, loan or sub-licensing, systematic supply or distribution in any form to anyone is expresslyforbidden.

 The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will becomplete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae and drug doses should beindependently verifiedwithprimary sources. The publishershall notbe liable foranyloss, actions, claims, proceedings,demand or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with orarising out of the use of this material.

©Taylor and Francis 2007

Page 2: Dretske, Fred. Conclusive Reasons

8/23/2019 Dretske, Fred. Conclusive Reasons

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dretske-fred-conclusive-reasons 2/23

   D  o  w  n   l  o  a   d  e   d   B  y  :   [   U  n   i  v  e  r  s   i   t  y  o   f   T  o  r  o  n   t  o   ]   A   t  :   1   5  :   1   0   1   1   M  a  y   2   0   0   7

Australasian Journa l of PhilosophyVol. 49, No. 1; May, 1971

F R E D D R E r S K E

C O N C L U S I V E R E A S O N S *

C o n c l u s i v e r e a s o n s h a v e a m o d a l a s w e l l a s a n e p i s te m i c c h a r a c t e r . I n

h a v i n g c o n c l u s i v e r e a s o n s t o b e l ie v e t h a t P is th e c a s e o n e ' s e p i s te m i c c r e d e n -

t ia ls a r e su c h a s t o e li m i n a t e t h e p o s s i b i l i t y o f m i s t a k e . T h i s , a t le a s t, ish o w I p r o p o s e t o u n d e r s t a n d t h e m f o r t h e r e m a i n d e r o f t h i s p a p e r . L e t t in g

t h e s y m b o l ' ( ) ' r e p r e s e n t t h e a p p r o p r i a t e m o d a l i t y ( a y e t t o b e c l ar if ie d s en s e

o f poss ib i l i t y ) , I s h a ll s a y , t h e n , t h a t R is a c o n c l u s i v e r e a s o n f o r P i f a n d

o n l y i f, g i v e n R , ~ ( ) ,-~ P ( o r , a l t e r n a t i v e l y , ~ ( ) ( R . ~ P ) ) . T h i s i n t e r -

p r e t a t i o n a l lo w s u s t o s a y o f a n y s u b j ec t , S , w h o b e l ie v e s t h a t P a n d w h o h a s

c o n c l u s iv e r e a s o n s f o r b e li e v in g t h a t P , t h a t , g i v e n t h e s e r e a s o n s , h e c o u Mn o t b e w r o n g a b o u t P o r , g i v e n t h e s e re a s o n s , i t i s f a l s e t h a t h e m ig h t b e

m i s ta k e n a b o u t P .

S u p p o s e , t h e n , t h a t

( I ) S k n o w s t h a t P a n d h e k n o w s t h is o n t h e b a si s (s i m p l y ) o f R e n ta i ls

( 2) R w o u l d n o t b e t h e c a s e u n l e s s P w e r e t h e c a s e . 1

T h e l a t t e r f o r m u l a e x p r e ss e s a c o n n e c t i o n b e t w e e n R a n d P w h i c h is s t r o n g

e n o u g h , I s u b m i t , t o p e r m i t u s t o s a y t h a t i f ( 2 ) is t r u e , t h e n R i s a c o n c l u s i v e

r e a s o n f o r P . F o r i f ( 2) is t r u e , w e a r e e n t i tl e d, n o t o n l y t o d e n y th a t , g i v e n R ,

n o t - P is t h e c a s e , b u t a l so t h a t , g i v e n R , n o t - P m i g h t b e t h e c a s e . T h a t is t o

s a y , ( 2 ) e l i m i n a t e s R a n d n o t - P a s a p o s s i b l e ( jo i n t ) s t a t e o f a f f a ir s a n d , w h e n

w e a r e g iv e n R , i t e l i m i n a t e s n o t - P a s a p o s s i b l e s t a t e o f a f f ai rs . T h i s is s ob e c a u s e ( 2 ) e n t a i l s t h e f a l s i t y o f ,

( 3) A l t h o u g h R is t h e c a s e P m i g h t n o t b e t h e c a s e .

I f w e e x p r e s s ( 3 ) a s ' G i v e n R , ( ) ,-~ P ' , t h e n ( 2) e n t a i l s t h a t i t is f a l se t h a t ,

g i v e n R , ( ) ~ P w h i c h is e q u i v a l e n t t o , g i v e n R , ~ ( ) ~ P ; a n d th i s is

p r e c is e ly t h e r e q u i r e d f e a t u r e o f c o n c l u s i v e r e a s o n s g i v e n a b o v e . H e n c e ,

w h e n ( 2 ) is t r u e , R i s a c o n c l u s i v e r e a s o n f o r P .

W h a t f o l l o w s is a n a m p l i f i c a t i o n o f t h e a b o v e s k e t c h - - h e n c e , a n a r g u m e n t

f o r th e v i e w t h a t i n th o s e c a s e s w h e r e k n o w l e d g e t h a t P r e st s o n e v i d e n c e ,

*An ear ly vers ion of th is pa per was read to the Ph i losophy D epar tm ent a t T he Uni -versi ty of I ll inois, Ch icago Circle. M ore recently i t was read at T he U niversi ty o f N or thCarol ina 's Col loquium in Phi losophy with Professor Robert Sleigh commenting.

x I shal l be using 'R ' and 'P ' to replace a variety o f related g ram ma tical uni ts . De pend ingon the sentential context, they sometimes serve as noun phrases, sometimes as fullindicat ive sentences, sometimes fo r appro priate t ransform ations o f the indicative.

1

Page 3: Dretske, Fred. Conclusive Reasons

8/23/2019 Dretske, Fred. Conclusive Reasons

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dretske-fred-conclusive-reasons 3/23

   D  o  w  n   l  o  a   d  e   d   B  y  :   [   U  n   i  v  e  r  s   i   t  y  o   f   T  o  r  o  n   t  o   ]   A   t  :   1   5  :   1   0   1   1   M  a  y   2   0   0   7

F r e d D r e t s k e

g r o u n d s , o r r e a s o n s , w h e n t h e q u e s t i o n ' H o w d o e s S k n o w ? ' c a n s e n s i b l y

b e a s k e d a n d a n s w e r e d , t h e e v i d e n ce , g r o u n d s , o r r e a s o n s m u s t b e c o n c l u si v e .

A n y t h i n g s h o r t o f co n c lu s iv e r e a s o ns , t h o u g h i t m a y p r o v i d e o n e w i t h

j u s t if i e d t r u e b e l i ef s , f a il s t o g i v e t h e k i n d o f s u p p o r t r e q u i s i t e t o k n o w l e d g e .I s h a l l a l s o u r g e t h a t t h e p o s s e s s i o n o f c o n c l u s i v e r e a s o n s t o b e l i e v e , p r o p e r l y

q u a l i fi e d , is a l so a s u f fi c ie n t c o n d i t i o n f o r k n o w l e d g e .

1. K n o w i n g P o n t h e B a s i s o f R : T h e C o n n e c t io n B e t w e e n (1 ) a n d (2) .

S u p p o s e S , in o r d e r t o a s s ur e h i m s e l f t h a t h is c h i ld ' s t e m p e r a t u r e i s

n o r m a l ( n o f e v e r ) , p l a ce s a t h e r m o m e t e r i n t h e c h i l d 's m o u t h , e x t r a c t s ita f t e r se v e ra l m i n u t e s , a n d o b s e r v e s a r e a d i n g o f 9 8.6 ° F . I n r e m a r k i n g t o t h e

d o c t o r t h a t h i s c h i l d ' s t e m p e r a t u r e i s n o r m a l S i s a s k e d h o w h e k n o w s .

S r e s p o n d s , n a t u r a l l y e n o u g h , b y s a y in g , ' I j u s t t o o k h is t e m p e r a t u r e ' .L e t u s a s s u m e , t h e n , t h a t w e h a v e a n i n s t a n t i a t i o n o f ( 1 ):

( l a ) S k n o w s t h a t h i s c h i l d ' s t e m p e r a t u r e i s n o r m a l a n d h e k n o w s t h i s

o n t h e b as is o f t h e ( n o r m a l ) r e a d in g o n t h e t h e r m o m e t e r (w h i c h

h e h a s j u s t p l a c e d i n t h e c h i l d ' s m o u t h , e tc .) .

C a n o n e c o n s i s t e n t ly a f fi rm ( l a ) a n d d e n y th e c o r r e s p o n d i n g i n s ta n t i a t i o n o f

( 2 ) ?

( 2 a) T h e t h e r m o m e t e r w o u l d n o t h a v e r e a d 9 8 .6 ° u n l es s t h e c h i l d 's

t e m p e r a t u r e w a s n o r m a l .

I f it i s n o t a l r e a d y o b v i o u s t h a t o n e c a n n o t c o n s i s t e n tl y a ff ir m ( l a ) a n d d e n y

( 2 a) , I t h i n k i t c a n b e m a d e o b v i o u s b y c o n s i d e r in g th e k i n d o f t h in g w h i c h

w o u l d s h o w ( 2a ) t o b e fa ls e. F o r e x a m p l e , i f C h a r l es , f a m i l i a r w i t h t h e

p a r t i c u l a r t h e r m o m e t e r in q u e s t i o n , s h o u l d s a y , ' O h , I k n o w t h a t t h e r -

m o m e t e r ; i t i s f a i r ly a c c u r a t e f o r t e m p e r a t u r e s b e l o w 9 8 ° b u t i t s ti ck s a t

9 8 .6 f o r a l m o s t a n y h i g h e r t e m p e r a t u r e , ' w e h a v e b e e n g i v en s o li d g r o u n d s f o rr e j ec t in g ( 2 a) . S i m u l t a n e o u s l y , h o w e v e r , w e h a v e b e e n g i v en s o l id g r o u n d s

f o r re j e c t in g ( l a ) . I f i t is t h a t k i n d o f t h e r m o m e t e r , t h e n i f S 's o n l y b a si s f o r

t h i n k i n g h i s c h i ld ' s t e m p e r a t u r e n o r m a l i s a 98 .6 r e a d i n g o n i t , t h e n h e d o e s

n o t k n o w t h a t hi s c h i ld ' s t e m p e r a t u r e i s n o r m a l . I t might b e n o r m a l , o fc o u r s e , b u t i f S k n o w s t h a t i t is , h e m u s t h a v e m o r e t o g o o n t h a n t h e r e a d i n g

o n t h is ( d e f e c ti v e ) t h e r m o m e t e r .

O t h e r a t t e m p t s t o s h o w ( 2 a ) f a l s e h a v e t h e s a m e e f f e c t ; t h e y i m m e d i a t e l y

u n d e r m i n e R ( t h e r e a d i n g o n t h e t h e r m o m e t e r ) a s a n a d e q u a t e b a s i s f o r

s o m e o n e ' s k n o w i n g th a t t h e c h i l d 's t e m p e r a t u r e i s n o r m a l (P ) . F o r i n

r e j e c t i n g ( 2 a ) w e r e j e c t t h e t h e r m o m e t e r a s a r e l i a b l e d e v i c e f o r d i s c o v e r i n g

w h e t h e r a p e r s o n ' s t e m p e r a t u r e i s n o r m a l , a n d k n o w l e d g e i s n o t a c q u i r e d

b y r e l y i n g o n w h a t i s u n r e l i a b l e i n p r e c i s e l y t h o s e r e s p e c t s i n w h i c h w e r e l y

o n i t .

W e fr e q u e n t l y p u r p o r t t o k n o w t h in g s o n th e b as is o f t e s ti m o n y . J a m e s

h a s a l a rg e s t a m p c o l l e c t i o n a n d , a f t e r g iv i n g a d e t a i l e d d e s c r i p t i o n o f i t,

i n v i te s S to h i s h o m e t o s e e i t. S d e c l i n e s, b u t h e l a t e r r e f e r s t o J a m e s ' s t a m p

c o l l e c t io n i n c o n v e r s a t i o n . I t is e a s y e n o u g h t o i m a g i n e c i rc u m s t a n c e s i n

w h i c h i t w o u l d b e n a t u r a l f o r s o m e o n e t o a s k S h o w h e k n e w , w h a t r e a s o n s

Page 4: Dretske, Fred. Conclusive Reasons

8/23/2019 Dretske, Fred. Conclusive Reasons

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dretske-fred-conclusive-reasons 4/23

   D  o  w  n   l  o  a   d  e   d   B  y  :   [   U  n   i  v  e  r  s   i   t  y  o   f   T  o  r  o  n   t  o   ]   A   t  :   1   5  :   1   0   1   1   M  a  y   2   0   0   7

C o n c l u s i v e R e a s o n s

h e h a d f o r th i n k i n g , t h a t J a m e s h a d s u c h a c o l le c t io n . A n d i t is j u s t a s e a s y

t o i m a g i n e S , i n r e s p o n s e t o s u c h a q u e r y , r e f e r r i n g t o h i s c o n v e r s a t i o n w i t h

J a m e s . L e t u s a s s u m e , t h e n , t h a t

( l b ) S k n o w s t h a t J a m e s h a s a s ta m p c o l le c t io n a n d h e k n o w s th is o n t h eb a s is o f J a m e s ' d e s c r i p t i o n ( a n d i n v i t a t i o n )

is t r ue . I a m n o t n o w c o n c e r n e d t o a r g u e t h a t o n e c a n k n o w s o m e t h i n g

o f t hi s s o r t i n t h is w a y ; t h e q u e s t i o n is , r a t h e r , w h e t h e r ( 2 b ) m u s t b e t r u e / f

( l b ) i s t r u e .

( 2 b) J a m e s w o u l d n o t h a v e s a id h e h a d a s t a m p c o l le c t i o n , d e s c r i b e d

i t i n s u c h d e t ai l, a n d i s s u e d a n i n v i t a t i o n u n l e s s h e h a d a s t a m p

c o l l e c t i o n .

I f J a m e s i s t h e s o r t o f f e l l o w a b o u t w h i c h ( 2 b ) c a n n o t b e t r u l y a s s e rt e d , t h e nh e is n o t t h e s o r t o f f e ll o w w h o c a n b e t r u s t e d o n s u c h m a t t e r s a s t hi s. I f

J a m e s is t h e s o r t o f f e ll o w w h o s o m e t i m e s s a y s s u c h t h i n g s a s a j o k e , w h o

w o u l d ( o r m i g h t ) c o n c o c t s u c h e l a b o r a t e s to r ie s f o r h i s o w n a m u s e m e n t

( o r w h a t e v e r ) , w h o w o u l d ( o r m i g h t ) w h i m s i c a l ly is su e a n i n v i t a t i o n o f th is

s o r t u n d e r t o t a l l y f al se p r e te x t s , t h e n , d e s p i t e t h e f a c t t h a t h e is ( b y h y p o -

t h e s i s ) t e l l i n g t h e t r u t h o n t h i s o c c a s i o n , h i s t e s t i m o n y i s h a r d l y t h e s o r t o n

w h i c h o n e c a n re s t a c l a im t o k n o w . I n d e n y i n g ( 2 b) o n e is c o n c e d i n g t h a t

J a m e s w o u l d , o r m i g h t , h a v e s a id w h a t h e d id w i t h o u t p o s s e ss i ng a s t a m p

c o l l e c ti o n , a n d i n t h e l ig h t o f th i s c o n c e s s i o n o n e c a n n o t g o o n t o i n s is t th a t ,

n o n e t h e l e s s , S k n o w s h e h a s a s t a m p c o l l e c ti o n o n t h e b a s is , s i m p l y , o f w h a t

J a m e s s a i d .

I n a r e c e n t a rt ic l e G i l b e r t H a r m a n c o n t r a s t s t w o c a s e s, t h e l o t t e r y c a s e

a n d t h e t e s t i m o n y c a s e . 2 A l t h o u g h S , s ay , h a s o n l y o n e a m o n g t h o u s a n d s o f

t ic k e ts i n a l o t t e r y a n d , h e n c e , h a s a n e x t r e m e l y s l e n d e r c h a n c e o f w i n n i n g ,

w e n a t u r a l l y r e j e ct th e i d e a t h a t S c o u l d k n o w t h a t h e w a s g o i n g t o lo s e o n t h e

b a s is o f a c o r r e c t p r o b a b i l i t y e s t im a t e ( w e ll o v e r 9 9 . 9 % ) o f h i s l o si n g . E v e n

i f S c o r r e c t l y p r e d i c ts t h a t h e i s g o i n g t o l o se , w e w o u l d d e n y t h a t h e k n e w h e

w a s g o i n g t o l o s e i f t h e o n l y b a s i s h e h a d f o r t h is b e l i e f w a s t h e f a c t t h a t h isc h a n c e s o f w i n n i n g w e r e s o s lig h t, s H a r m a n c o m p a r e s t h is c a s e w i t h t h e

s i tu a t io n i n w h i c h w e o f te n s e e m p r e p a r e d t o s ay t h a t S k n o w s t h a t P w h e n

h e is t o l d t h a t P is t h e c as e b y s o m e o t h e r p e r s o n ( t e s t i m o n y c a se ) . A l t h o u g h

p r o b a b i l i t y e s ti m a t e s a re n o t a l t o g e th e r a p p r o p r i a t e h e r e , w e d o k n o w t h a t

p e o p l e s o m e t i m e s l ie , s o m e t i m e s t h e y a r e h o n e s t l y m i s t a k e n , a n d s o o n .

T h e r e a l w a y s s e e m s t o b e a c h a n c e t h a t w h a t a p e r s o n t e l l s u s i s n o t t h e c a s e

h o w e v e r s in c e re o r c re d ib l e h e m a y a p p e a r , a n d t h e o r d e r o f m a g n i t u d e o f

2 'Kno wled ge, Inference, and Ex plana t ion ' , in American Philosophical Quarterly, July,1968.

8 O f course S m ay have sa id ' I kn ow I am going to lose ' and he m ay say now, af ter he haslost , ' I knew I was going to lose ' , but these expressions are normally accepted withoutepistemological quibbling because the y are tak en a s li tt le m ore th an expressions o f resig-nat ion o r despair . W i th th is use of the verb ' to k now ' , one can kno w one i s going tolose and s t i l l spend a dol lar for a ticket an d a ch ance at the prize---a fact abou t hum anbeings which is puzzling if they believe they know (in any epistemologically relevantsense) that they are going to lose.

3

Page 5: Dretske, Fred. Conclusive Reasons

8/23/2019 Dretske, Fred. Conclusive Reasons

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dretske-fred-conclusive-reasons 5/23

   D  o  w  n   l  o  a   d  e   d   B  y  :   [   U  n   i  v  e  r  s   i   t  y  o   f   T  o  r  o  n   t  o   ]   A   t  :   1   5  :   1   0   1   1   M  a  y   2   0   0   7

Fred Dretske

t h is c h a n c e s e e m s t o b e c o m p a r a b l e t o t h e c h a n c e w e m i g h t w i n i n s o m e

a p p r o p r i a t e l o t t e r y s i tu a t i o n . W h y , t h e n , a r e w e p r e p a r e d t o s a y t h a t w e

k n o w i n t h e o n e c a s e b u t n o t i n t h e o t h e r ? H a r m a n h a s s o m e r e v e a l in g

r e m a r k s t o m a k e a b o u t t h e s e c a s e s , b u t I m e n t i o n t h e m o n l y to b r i n g o u tt h e i r r e l e v a n c e t o t h e p r e s e n t d i s c u s s i o n . F o r I t h i n k th i s c o n t r a s t s t re n g t h e n s

t h e v i e w t h a t ( 2 ) i s n o r m a l l y a c c e p t e d a s a n e c e s s a r y c o n s e q u e n c e o f (1 ) ,

t h a t w h e n w e a r e u n w i l l i n g t o e n d o r s e t h e c o r r e s p o n d i n g i n s t a n t i a t i o n o f

( 2 ) w e a r e u n w i l l i n g t o t a l k o f a n y o n e k n o w i n g t h a t P i s t h e c a s e o n t h e b a s i s

o f t h e e v i d e n c e e x p r e s s e d b y R . I n m a n y t e s t i m o n y s i t u a t io n s w e a r e , I

b e l ie v e , w i l l i n g t o a f f i r m ( 2 ): t h e p e r s o n w o u l d n o t h a v e s a i d i t u n l e s s i t w a s

s o . I n t h e l o t t e r y c a s e , h o w e v e r , t h e c o n n e c t i o n b e t w e e n R a n d P e x p r e s s e d

b y t h i s s u b j u n c t i v e c o n d i t i o n a l f a il s t o b e r e a l i z e d , a n d i t f a i l s n o m a t t e r h o w

g r e a t th e p r o b a b i l i t i e s b e c o m e . A d j u s t i n g t h e w o r d i n g o f ( 2 ) t o s u i t t h e

e x a m p l e i n q u e s t i o n 4 w e h a v e

( 2 c) I f S w e r e g o i n g t o w i n t h e l o t t e r y , h i s c h a n c e s o f w i n n i n g w o u l d

n o t b e 1 / m ( m b e i n g t h e n u m b e r o f t i c k e t s s o ld ) .

W h a t e v e r ( f i n i te ) v a lu e w e g iv e t o ' m ' , w e k n o w t h is is f a ls e s i n c e s o m e o n e

w h o s e c h a n c e s o f w i n n i n g a r e 1 / m will w i n , a n d s in c e t h e r e i s n o t h i n g s p e c i a l

a b o u t S w h i c h w o u l d r e q u i r e h i m t o h a v e a b e t t e r c h a n c e o f w i n n i n g t h a n

a n y o n e e l se i n o r d e r t o w i n , w e r e j e c t ( 2 c) a s f a l s e . H e n c e , w e r e j e c t t h e i d e a

t h a t S c a n k n o w h e i s g o i n g t o l o s e o n t h e b a s i s o f t h e f a c t t h a t h i s c h a n c e s o f

l o s in g a r e ( m - 1 ) / m .A l v i n G o l d m a n , i n d e v e l o p i n g a c a u s a l a c c o u n t o f k n o w l e d g e , c o n s t r u c t s a

s i t u a t i o n i n w h i c h S i s sa i d to k n o w t h a t a n e a r b y m o u n t a i n ( I w i l l c a l l i t M )

e r u p t e d m a n y y e a r s a g o . H e k n o w s t h i s o n t h e b a s i s o f t h e p r e s e n c e o f

s o l id i f i e d l a v a t h r o u g h o u t t h e c o u n t r y s i d e s u r r o u n d i n g t h e m o u n t a i n . 5

A c c o r d i n g t o G o l d m a n , a n e c e s s a r y c o n d i t i o n fo r S ' s k n o w i n g t h a t M

e r u p t e d m a n y y e a r s a g o o n t h e b a s i s o f t h e p r e s e n t ex i s t e n c e a n d d i s t r i b u t i o n

o f t h e l a v a is th a t t h e r e b e a c a u s a l c o n n e c t i o n b e t w e e n t h e e r u p t i o n o f th e

m o u n t a i n a n d t h e p r e s e n t e x is t en c e a n d d i s t r i b u t i o n o f t h e l a v a . I d o n o t

4 T h e wo rd i n g o f (2) w i l l s o m e t i m es h av e t o b e a d j u s t ed t o s u it t h e p a r t i cu l a r i n s t an t ia t i o ni n q u es ti o n . T h e ch i e f f ac t o r s d e te rm i n i n g th i s ad j u s t m en t a r e t h e r e l a t iv e t em p o ra ll o ca t i o n s o f R , P an d t h e t i m e o f u t t e ran ce an d a l s o th e cau s a l co n n ec t io n s , i f an y , wh i cha re b e li ev ed t o h o l d b e t ween R an d P . T h e p a r t i cu l a r wo rd i n g I h av e g i v en (2) i s m o s tap p ro p r i a t e wh en P i s s o m e s t a t e o f a f f a i r s an t eced en t t o (o r co n t em p o ran eo u s wi t h )b o t h R an d t h e t i m e o f u tt e r an ce . T h i s , o f co u rs e , i s t h e r e su l t o f t h e f ac t th a t (2) ism o s t o f t en u s ed w h en P i s s o m e s t a t e o f a f f a i rs cau s a l l y r e s p o n s i b l e fo r t h e p re s en tco n d i t i o n R . W h en P i s a fu t u re s ta t e we m i g h t ex p re s s (2) a s : R wo u l d n o t b e t h e ca s eu n l es s P w ere g o i n g t o h ap p en . Fo r ex am p l e , h e wo u l d n o t h av e r eg i s te r ed u n l es s h ewere g o i n g t o v o t e . I d o n o t w i sh t o p rec l u d e t h e p o s s i b i li t y o f k n o wi n g t h a t s o m e t h i n g

will o ccu r o n t h e b as i s o f p re s en t ev id en ce b y r e s t r ic t i n g t h e w o rd i n g o f (2) . T h ed if ficu lty, o f course , i s tha t when P i s som e fu tu re s ta te , the sub junct ive re la t ing i t to Rg en e ra l ly b eco m es so m ew h a t q u es t io n ab l e . W e p re fe r t o s ay , i n o u r m o re cau t i o u sm o o d s , t h a t i f h e w e re n o t planning to vo te , he w ould no t have reg is te red (acknowledg ing ,thereby , the fac t tha t con t ingencies may in te r fe re wi th the execu t ion o f h i s p lans ) .B u t i n t h e s am e cau t i o u s m o o d s w e p re fe r t o s ay , n o t t h a t w e k n o w h e i s g o i n g to v o t e(b ecau s e h e r eg is t e red ) , b u t t h a t we k n o w h e p l an s o r i n t en d s t o v o t e .' A C a u s a l T h e o r y o f K n o w i n g ', Journal of Philosophy, Jan e 22, 1967, p . 361.

4

Page 6: Dretske, Fred. Conclusive Reasons

8/23/2019 Dretske, Fred. Conclusive Reasons

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dretske-fred-conclusive-reasons 6/23

   D  o  w  n   l  o  a   d  e   d   B  y  :   [   U  n   i  v  e  r  s   i   t  y  o   f   T  o  r  o  n   t  o   ]   A   t  :   1   5  :   1   0   1   1   M  a  y   2   0   0   7

C o n c l u s i v e R e a s o n s

w i s h t o d i s p u t e t h i s c la i m a t t h e m o m e n t s in c e t h e v i ew I a m a d v a n c i n g i s e v e n

s t r o n g e r : v iz . t h a t a n e c e s s a ry c o n d it io n f o r S t o k n o w t h a t M e r u p t e d o n

t h is b a s i s i s t h a t

( 2d ) T h e l a v a w o u l d n o t b e h e r e , a n d d i s t r ib u t e d i n t h is m a n n e r , u n l e s sM e r u p t e d

i s t r u e . ( 2 d) is a s t r o n g e r c l a i m t h a n t h a t th e e r u p t i o n o f M i s c a u s a l l y

c o n n e c t e d w i t h t h e p r e s e n t e x i s te n c e a n d d i s t r ib u t i o n o f t h e l a v a . ( 2 d ) r e -

q u i re s , in a d d i t i o n , t h a t M ' s e r u p t i o n b e n e c e s s a r y f o r t h e p r e s e n t s t a t e o f

a f fa ir s. T o il lu s t ra t e , c o n s i d e r th e f o l lo w i n g e m b e l l i s h m e n t o n G o l d m a n ' s

e x a m p l e. N o t f a r f r o m M is a n o t h e r m o u n t a i n , N . T h e g e o l o g y o f t h e

a r e a i s s u c h t h a t a t t h e p o i n t i n t i m e a t w h i c h M e r u p t e d s o m e t h i n g , s o t o

s p e a k, w a s b o u n d t o g i ve ; i f M h a d n o t e ru p t e d , N w o u l d h a v e . F u r t h e r -

m o r e , t h e l o c a t i o n o f N i s s u c h t h a t i f i t, ra t h e r t h a n M , h a d e r u p t e d , t h ep r e s e n t d i s t r i b u t io n o f la v a w o u l d h a v e b e e n , i n a l l r e s p e c t s re l e v a n t t o S ' s

t a k i n g i t a s a r e a s o n f o r b e l ie v i n g M e r u p t e d , t h e s a m e . I n s u c h c i r c u m -

s t an c e s G o l d m a n ' s n e c e s s a r y c o n d i t i o n i s s a ti sf ie d , b u t m i n e i s n o t . ( 2d ) i s

f a l s e ; i t i s f a l s e t h a t t h e l a v a w o u l d n o t b e h e r e , a n d d i s t r i b u t e d i n t h is f a s h i o n ,

u n le s s M h a d e r u p t e d . F o r if , c o n t r a r y t o h y p o t h e s i s , M h a d n o t e r u p t e d ,

N w o u l d h a v e ; l e a v i n g th e v e r y s a m e ( re l e v a n t) tr a c e s.

I n s u c h c ir c u m s t a n c e s I d o n o t t h i n k w e c o u l d s a y t h a t S k n e w t h a t M

e r u p t e d o n t h e b a s is o f t h e p r e s e n t e xi s te n c e a n d d i s t r ib u t i o n o f l a v a . F o r ,

b y h y p o t h e s i s , th i s s t at e o f a f fa ir s w o u l d h a v e o b t a i n e d w h e t h e r M e r u p t e do r n o t a n d , h e n c e , t h e r e i s n o t h i n g a b o u t t h is s t a t e o f a f fa i rs w h i c h f a v o u r s

o n e h y p o t h e s i s ( M e r u p te d ) o v e r a c o m p e t i n g h y p o t h e s i s ( N e r u p t e d ). S

i s s t i l l c o r r e c t i n s u p p o s i n g t h a t M d i d e r u p t , s t i l l c o r r e c t i n s u p p o s i n g t h a t

i t w a s M ' s e r u p t i o n w h i c h i s c a u s a l l y r e s p o n s i b l e f o r t h e p r e s e n t e x i s t en c e

a n d d i s t r ib u t i o n o f l a v a, b u t h e d o e s n o t k n o w i t w a s M t h a t e r u p t e d - - n o t

u n le s s h e h a s s o m e a d d i ti o n a l g r o u n d s w h i c h p re c l u d e N . I f h e h a s s uc h

a d d i t io n a l g r o u n d s , c a ll t h e m Q , t h e n w e c a n s a y th a t h e k n o w s t h a t M

e r u p t e d a n d h e k n o w s t h i s o n t h e b a s i s o f R a n d Q . I n t h i s c a s e , h o w e v e r ,

t h e c o r r e s p o n d i n g i n s t a n t i a t i o n o f ( 2) i s a l s o s a ti s f ie d : R a n d Q w o u l d n o tb e t h e c a s e u n l e s s M e r u p t e d . A s th i n g s s t a n d , t h e m o s t t h a t S c o u l d k n o w ,

o n t h e b a s i s s i m p l y o f th e p r e s e n t e x i s te n c e a n d d i s t r i b u t i o n o f l a v a , is t h a t

e i t h e r M o r N e r u p t e d . (2 ) p e r m i t s u s to s a y th is m u c h , a n d n o m o r e , a b o u t

w h a t c a n b e k n o w n o n t h e b a s is o f la v a fl ow .

T h e c a s e b e c o m e s e v e n c l e a re r if w e e x p l o it a n o t h e r o f H a r m a n ' s e x a m p l e s .6

H a r o l d h a s a ti c k e t i n a lo t t e ry . T h e o d d s a g a i n s t h is w i n n i n g a r e 1 0 ,0 0 0 t o 1 .

T h e p r i z e , c a l l i t a n X , i s s o m e t h i n g t h a t H a r o l d d o e s n o t n o w h a v e n o r

c o u l d h e r e a s o n a b l y e x p e c t t o o b t a i n o n e b y m e a n s o t h e r t h a n w i n n i n g t h e

l o tt e ry . E n t e r a p h i l a n t h r o p i c g e n tl e m a n , R o c k a f o r d , w h o d e c id e s t o g iv eH a r o l d a n X i f ( a s se e m s li k e ly ) h e s h o u l d f a il t o w i n o n e i n t h e l o t t e ry .

T h i n g s 3 o a s o n e w o u l d e x p e c t ; H a r o l d h o l d s a l o si n g t ic k e t. R o c k a f o r d

k e e p s h is w o r d a n d g i ve s H a r o l d a n X . S , f a m i l i a r w i t h t he a b o v e c i rc u m -

s ta n c e s b u t u n a w a r e o f w h e t h e r H a r o l d w o n o r l o s t i n t he l o t te r y , fi nd s

o In 'Know ledge, Inference, and Explanation', pp . 168-9. I have adapted the examplesomewhat.

Page 7: Dretske, Fred. Conclusive Reasons

8/23/2019 Dretske, Fred. Conclusive Reasons

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dretske-fred-conclusive-reasons 7/23

   D  o  w  n   l  o  a   d  e   d   B  y  :   [   U  n   i  v  e  r  s   i   t  y  o   f   T  o  r  o  n   t  o   ]   A   t  :   1   5  :   1   0   1   1   M  a  y   2   0   0   7

F r e d D r e t s k e

Har old with his newly acquired X. S infers that Haro ld received his X from

Roekaford. He concludes this because he knows that the only other wayHarold might have acquired an X is by winning the lottery and the odds

against that happening are enormous . The following conditions are satis-fied: (a) Harold received his X from Rockaford; (b) S believes that Harold

received his X from Rockaford; (c) S is warranted in believing this since the

chances of his having received it in any other way are negligible; (d) Rocka-

ford's generous gift of an X to Harol d is the (causal ?) explanation of Haro ld' s

present possession of an X; and, finally (e) S correctly reconstructs (to use

Goldman's language) the causal chain of events which brought about

Haro ld's possession of an X. Yet, why does it seem clear (at least to myself---and apparently to Harman) and S does n o t know that Rockaford gave

Harold his X. Because(2e) Harold would not have an X unless Rockaford gave him one

is plainly false.7 If Rockaford had no t given him an X, it would have been

because Harold already possessed one as a winner in the lottery. Hence,

Harold would possess an X even if Rockaford had not given him one.

It is not true that R would not be the case u n l e s s P; hence, not true that S

knows tha t P on the basis o f R. s

(2), therefore, expresses something stronger than a causal relationship

between R and P. It should be pointed out, however, that it expresses

something which is, in certain important respects, weaker than a universal

association between states or condit ions similar to R and states or conditions

similar to P. When 'R ' and 'P' are expressions which stand for particular

conditions or states of affairs, as will often be the case when we know one

thing on the basis of something else, (2) expresses a connection between more

d e t e r m i n a t e states of affairs than those described by talking about states

similar to R and P. If someone remarks, mid-way through a poker hand,

that if his neighbour had not folded (dropped from the game) he (the speaker)

would have been dealt a royal flush, he is obviously not maintaining that

w h e n e v e r his neighbour remains in the game, he (the speaker) is rewarded

with a royal flush. Rather, he is talking about t h i s hand (already holding

four cards to the royal flush), t h i s p a r t i c u l a r distribution of cards in the

remainder of the deck, t h i s p a r t i c u l a r seating arrangement, and so on.

He is not saying tha t his neighbour' s remaining in the game is, quite generally,

sufficient for his receipt of a royal flush. Rather , he is saying tha t i n t h e

7 There is a way of reading (2e) which makes it sound true--viz , if we illicitly smuggle inthe fact that Harold has lost the lottery. That is, (2e') 'Harold, having lost the lottery,would not have an X unless Rockaford had given him one', is true. But this version of(2) makes R, the reason S has for believing Rockaford gave him an X, not only Harold'spossession of an X but also his having lost the lottery. This, by hypothesis, is not partof S's reason; hence, not properly included in (2e). (2e) must be read in something likethe followingfashion: Harold would not have an X, whatever the outcome of the lottery,unless Rockaford had given him one. With this reading it is clearly false.

s It is difficult to say whether this is a counter-example to Goldman's analysis. I think itsatisfies all the conditions he catalogues as sufficient for knowledge, but this depends onhow strictly Goldman intends the condition that S must be warranted in inferring thatP is the case from R.

6

Page 8: Dretske, Fred. Conclusive Reasons

8/23/2019 Dretske, Fred. Conclusive Reasons

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dretske-fred-conclusive-reasons 8/23

   D  o  w  n   l  o  a   d  e   d   B  y  :   [   U  n   i  v  e  r  s   i   t  y  o   f   T  o  r  o  n   t  o   ]   A   t  :   1   5  :   1   0   1   1   M  a  y   2   0   0   7

C o n c l u s i v e Re a so n s

p a r t ic u l a r c i r c u m s t a n c e s w h i c h i n f a c t p re v a i l e d o n t h i s o c c a s io n , circumstances

which include such things as ca rd distribution, arrangement of players, etc.,

an occurrence of the first sort (neighbour remains in game) will invariably

be followed by one o f the second sort (his receipt of a royal flush). Onecannot falsify his claim by showing that he would not have received a royal

flush, despite his neighbour's remaining in the game, if the card distribution

in the deck had been different from what it in fact was. Fo r his claim was a

claim about the inevitable sequence of events w i t h t h a t d i s t r ib u t i o n o f c a rd s .

Statements such as (2), then, even when R and P are expressions for par-

ticular states of affairs, express a general uniformity, but this general uni-

formity is not that whenever a state similar to R is the case, then a state

similar to P will also be (or have been) the case. The uniformi ty in question

concerns the relationship between states similar to R and P u n d er a f i x e dse t o f c i r c u m s t a n c e s . Whenever (a state such as) R i n c i r c u m s t a n c e s C then

(a state such as) P where the circumstances C are defined in terms of those

circumstances which actually prevail on the occasion of R and P. But does

C include a ll the circumstances that prevail on the occasion in question or

only s o m e of these? Clearly not all the circumstances since this would

trivialize every subjunctive condi tional of this sort. Even if we restrict C

to only those circumstances logically independent of R and P we still obtain

a trivialization. For, to use Goldm an 's moun tain example (as embellished),

C would still include the fact that N did not erupt (since this is logicallyindependent of bo th R and P), and this is obviously one o f the circumstances

n o t held fixed when we say that the lava would not be here unless M erupted.

For in asserting his subjunctive we mean to be asserting something which

would be f a l s e in the situation described (N would have erupted if M had

not) whereas if we hold this circumstance (N did not erupt) fixed, the uni -

formity between the presence of lava and M's eruption would hold .

I think that our examples, not to mention an extensive literature on the

subject, 9 point the way to a proper interpretation of C. The circumstanceswhich are assumed constant, which are tacitly held fixed, in conditionals

such as (2), are those circumstances prevailing on the occasion in question

(the occasion on and between which the particular states R and P obtain)

which are logically and causally independent of the state of affairs expressed

9 I am not proposing a solution to the problem to which Nelson Goodman (Fact, Fictionand Forecast, Chapter I), Roderick Chisholm ('The Contrary-to-Fact Conditional,"Mind, 55, 1946) and others addressed themselves in trying to specify the 'relevant con-ditions' associated with counterfactuals. I shall use the notion of 'causality' in mytreatment, a device which both Goodman and Chisholm would regard as question-begging. I am not, however, attempting to offer an extensionalist analysis of the sub-junctive conditional; I am merely trying to get clear in what way such conditionals arestronger than the statement of a causal relationship between R and P and yet (in onesense) weaker than a statement of the universal association between states similar toRand P.

Page 9: Dretske, Fred. Conclusive Reasons

8/23/2019 Dretske, Fred. Conclusive Reasons

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dretske-fred-conclusive-reasons 9/23

   D  o  w  n   l  o  a   d  e   d   B  y  :   [   U  n   i  v  e  r  s   i   t  y  o   f   T  o  r  o  n   t  o   ]   A   t  :   1   5  :   1   0   1   1   M  a  y   2   0   0   7

Fred Dretske

b y p.1 0 W h e n w e h a v e a s t a t e m e n t in t h e s u b j u n c t i v e w h i c h ( u n l i k e ( 2 ))

i s c o u n t e r f a c t u a l ( t h e a n t e c e d e n t g i v e s e x p r e s s i o n t o a s t a t e o f a f f a i r s w h i c h

d o e s o r d i d n o t o b t a i n ) , t h e n C i n c l u d e s th o s e c ir c u m s t a n c e s p r e v a i li n g o n t h e

o c c a s i o n w h i c h a r e l o g i ca l ly a n d c a u s a l ly i n d e p e n d e n t o f t h e s t a te o f a f fa ir s( o r l a c k o f s u c h s t a t e ) e x p r e s s e d b y t h e a n te c e d e n t o f t h e c o n d i t i o n a l . I n

o u r p o k e r g a m e , f o r e x a m p l e , w e c a n s a y t h a t S ' s s ta t e m e n t (I w o u l d h a v e

g o t a r o y a l f lu s h i f m y n e i g h b o u r h a d s t ay e d i n th e g a m e ) f i x e s t h a t s e t o f

c i r c u m s t a n c e s w h i c h a r e l o g i c al ly a n d c a u s a ll y i n d e p e n d e n t o f h i s n e i g h b o u r ' s

s t a y i n g in t h e g a m e ( i .e . t h e a n t e c e d e n t s i nc e t h e s t a t e m e n t is c o u n t e r f a c t u a l ) .

H e n c e , i f t h e r e is a n o t h e r p l a y e r i n t h e g a m e ( w h o s e p r e s e n c e o r a b s e n c ea f fe c ts t h e c a r d s d e a l t t o S ) w h o w o u l d h a v e d r o p p e d i f S 's n e i g h b o u r h a d

n o t d r o p p e d , t h e n t h i s p e r s o n ' s r e m a i n i n g i n t h e g a m e i s n o t h e l d f ix e d , n o t

i n c l u d e d i n C , b e c a u s e i t i s c a u s a l l y c o n n e c t e d t o t h e s t a t e o f a f f a i rs e x p r e s s e db y th e a n t e c e d e n t i n S 's s t a te m e n t . T h e r e f o r e , w e c a n s h o w S ' s s t a t e m e n tt o b e f a l s e i f w e c a n s h o w t h a t s u c h a c i r c u m s t a n c e p r e v a i l e d , a n d i t i s a l o n g

t h e s e l i n e s t h a t o n e w o u l d s u r e l y a r g u e i n a t t e m p t i n g t o s h o w S t h a t h e

w a s w r o n g , w r o n g i n s a y in g th a t h e w o u l d h a v e r e c e iv e d a r o y a l f lu s h i f h i sn e i g h b o u r h a d s t a y e d i n t h e g a m e .

O n t h e o t h e r h a n d , o n e c a n n o t s h o w t h a t S 's s t a t e m e n t is f a ls e b y s h o w i n gt h a t , w e r e t h e c a r d s d i f f e re n t ly a r r a n g e d i n th e r e m a i n d e r o f t h e d e c k , h e

w o u l d n o t h a v e r e c ei v e d h is r o y a l fl u s h ; f o r t h e a r r a n g e m e n t o f c a r d s i n t h e

r e m a i n d e r o f t h e d e c k ( u n l ik e t h e p r e s e n c e o r a b s e n c e o f o u r o t h e r p l a y e r )is ( p r e s u m a b l y ) i n d e p e n d e n t o f S 's n e i g h b o u r ' s d e p a r t u r e f r o m t h e g a m e .

H e n c e , i t i s o n e o f th e c o n d i t i o n s h e l d f i x e d , i n c l u d e d i n C , b y S ' s s t a t e m e n t ,

a n d w e a r e n o t a l l o w e d t o c o n s i d e r a l t e r a t i o n s i n i t i n a s s e s s i n g t h e g e n e r a li m p l i c a t io n o f S ' s s t a t e m e n t .

O r c o n s i d e r o u r o r i g in a l t h e r m o m e t e r e x a m p l e . R e c a ll , t h e s t a t e m e n t i n

q u e s t i o n w a s : ' T h e t h e r m o m e t e r w o u l d n o t h a v e r e a d 9 8 .6 ° u n l es s t h e c h i ld ' s

t e m p e r a t u r e w a s n o r m a l . ' S u p p o s e s o m e o n e r e sp o n d s , ' O h , it w o u l d h a v e( o r m i g h t h a v e) if t h e th e r m o m e t e r w a s b r o k e n . ' I t is i m p o r t a n t t o u n d e r -

s t a n d t h a t o n e c a n g r a n t t h e t r u t h o f th is r e s p on s e w i t h o u t a b a n d o n i n g t h eo r i g i n a l a s s e r t i o n ; f o r t h e o r i g i n a l a s s e r t i o n h a d , a s i t s g e n e r a l i m p l i c a t i o n ,

n o t a s t a t e m e n t e x p r e s s i n g a u n i f o r m r e l a t i o n s h i p b e t w e e n s t a t e s o f a f fa i rss i m i l a r t o t h e c h i l d ' s t e m p e r a t u r e ( n o r m a l b o d y t e m p e r a t u r e ) a n d s t a t e s o fa f fa i rs s i m i l a r t o t h e t h e r m o m e t e r r e a d i n g ( a r e a d i n g o f 98 .6 ) , b u t , r a t h e r , a

u n i f o r m i t y b e t w e e n s u c h s t a t e s u n d e r a f i x e d s e t o f c ir c u ms ta n c es . A n d , i f

10 T h i s c h a r a c t e r i z a t i o n o f t h e c i r c u m s t a n c e s ' C ' h a s i n t e r e s t i n g a n d , I b e l i e v e , s i g n if i c an t

r e p e r c u s s i o n s f o r s u b j u n c t i v e s h a v i n g t h e f o r m o f ( 2) in w h i c h R e x p r e ss e s so m e p r e s e n t( o r p a s t ) s t a t e o f a ff a ir s a n d P e x p r e s se s s o m e f u t u r e s t a t e o f a f fa i rs . A l t h o u g h I l a c k t h e

s p a c e t o d i sc u s s t h e p o i n t h e r e , I b e l i ev e a n i m p o r t a n t a s y m m e t r y is g e n e r a t e d b y a s h i f ti n t h e r e l a ti v e t e m p o r a l l o c a t i o n s o f R a n d P . I a ls o be l ie v e , h o w e v e r , t h a t t h i s a s y m -m e t r y i s f a i th f u l l y re f l ec t e d i n t h e d i f f e r en c e b e t w e e n k n o w i n g w h a t will h a p p e n o n t h eb a si s o f p r e s e n t d a t a a n d k n o w i n g w h a t did h a p p e n o n t h e b a s is o f p r e s e n t d a t a . I no t h e r w o r d s , I f e el t h a t a n a s y m m e t r y i n ( 2 ), a r i si n g f r o m a s h i f t in t h e r e l a t i v e t e m -p o r a l l o c a t i o n s o f R a n d P , h e l p s o n e t o u n d e r s t a n d t h e d i f fe r e n c e w e a l l f e el b e t w e e nk n o w i n g , o n t h e o n e h a n d , w h a t d i d h a p p e n o r i s h a p p e n i n g , a n d , o n t h e o t h e r h a n d ,w h a t w i l l h a p p e n .

Page 10: Dretske, Fred. Conclusive Reasons

8/23/2019 Dretske, Fred. Conclusive Reasons

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dretske-fred-conclusive-reasons 10/23

   D  o  w  n   l  o  a   d  e   d   B  y  :   [   U  n   i  v  e  r  s   i   t  y  o   f   T  o  r  o  n   t  o   ]   A   t  :   1   5  :   1   0   1   1   M  a  y   2   0   0   7

Conc lus ive Reasons

I a m f i g h t , th i s f i x e d se t o f c i r c u m s t a n c e s i n c l u d e s t h e a c tu a l s t a t e o f t h ethermometer ( d e f e c t i v e o r a c c u r a t e ) ; i t is o n e o f t h o s e c i r c u m s t a n c e s p r e v a i l i n g

o n t h e o c c a s i o n i n q u e s t i o n w h i c h i s c a u s a ll y a n d l o g i ca l ly i n d e p e n d e n t o f

t h e c h i ld ' s t e m p e r a t u r e . H e n c e , t h is c i r c u m s t a n c e c a n n o t b e a l l o w e d tov a r y a s it is in t h e a b o v e r e s p o n s e b y t h e w o r d s ' i f t h e t h e r m o m e t e r w a s

b r o k e n ' . T o d e t e r m i n e t h e t r u t h o f t h e o r i g in a l a s s e r t i o n w e m u s t s u p p o s e

t h a t t h e t h e r m o m e t e r i s a c c u r a te ( o r d e f e ct iv e ) whatever the ac tua l cond i tion i s.I f, t h e r e fo r e , t h e t h e r m o m e t e r w a s n o t b r o k e n o r o t h e r w i s e d e f e c ti v e o n t h a t

o c c a s i o n , t h e n t h e s u g g e s t i o n t h a t i t w o u l d ( o r m i g h t ) h a v e r e a d t h e s a m e

d e s p it e a f e v e r i s h c h i l d i f i t w e r e b r o k e n o r d e f e c t iv e is , a l t h o u g h q u i t e t r u e ,

i rr e le v a n t t o t h e t r u t h o f th e s t a t e m e n t : ' I t w o u l d n o t h a v e r e a d 9 8 . 6 u n l es s

t h e c h i ld ' s t e m p e r a t u r e w a s n o r m a l . '

O n e fi n a l i m p o r t a n t f e a t u r e o f ( 2 ). I h a v e s a id t h a t , g e n e r a l l y s p e a k i n g ,t h e p l a c e - h o l d e r s ' R ' a n d ' P ' r e p r e s e n t e x p r e s s i o n s d e s i g n a t i n g speci f ic s ta tes

o f a f fa i rs o r c o n d i t i o n s . W h e n t h is is s o , ( 2 ) s ti ll h a s a g e n e r a l i m p l i c a t i o n ,

b u t t h e g e n e r a l i m p l i c a t i o n , e x p r e s s i n g a u n i f o r m r e l a t i o n s h i p b e t w e e n

s ta te s o f a ff a ir s si m i l a r t o R a n d P , has i t s scope res t r ic ted t o s i t u a t i o n s i n

w h i c h t h e c i rc u m s t a n c e s C ( as s p e c if i ed a b o v e ) o b t a i n . S i n c e w e a r e t a l k i n g

a b o u t s p e c if ic s t a t es o f a f fa i rs i n m o s t i n s t a n t i a t i o n s o f (2 ), i t b e c o m e s

e x t r em e l y i m p o r t a n t t o o b s e r v e th e s o r ts o f r e f e rr i n g e x p r e s s io n s e m b o d i e d

w i t h in b o t h ' R ' a n d ' P ' . F o r e x a m p l e , w h e n I s ay , ' J o h n w o u l d n o t h a v e s ai d

i t w a s r a i n i n g u n l e s s i t w a s r a i n i n g ' I a m t a l k i n g a b o u t John a n d a b o u t apar t icu lar u t t e rance o f h i s . S o m e o n e e l s e m i g h t h a v e s a i d t h i s w i t h o u t i t s

b e i ng t r u e ; J o h n m a y h a v e s a id someth ing e l se w i t h o u t i ts b e i n g t r u e . N o n e -

the less , John w o u l d n o t h a v e s a id i t was raining u n l e s s i t w a s . A n i n c u r a b l e

l ia r a b o u t m o s t t h i n g s, J o h n h a s a p a t h o l o g i c a l d e v o t i o n t o a c c u r a c y o n

m a t t e r s c o n c e r n i n g t h e w e a t h e r . I n s u c h a ca s e, a l t h o u g h J o h n i s, a d m i t t e d ly ,

a m o s t u n r e l i a b l e i n f o r m a n t o n m o s t m a t t e r s , w e c a n s a y t h a t h e w o u l d

n o t h a v e s a i d it w a s r a i n i n g u n l e s s i t w a s s o . T h i s is o n l y t o s a y t h a t t h e

r e f er r in g e x p r e s s io n s t o b e f o u n d i n ' R ' a n d ' P ' help to def ine the scope o ft h e i m p l i e d g e n e r a l i z a t i o n . R e c a l l , t h e i m p l i e d g e n e r a l i z a t i o n w a s a b o u t

s t a t e s o f a f f a i r s s imi lar t o ( t h e p a r t i c u l a r s ta t e s) R a n d P . S i m i l a r i n w h a t

r e s p e c t ? T h e s o r t o f r e f e r ri n g e x p r e s si o n s t o b e f o u n d w i t h i n ' R ' a n d ' P '

h e l p u s to a n s w e r th i s q u e s t io n . I n t h e c a s e o f J o h n a b o v e , t h e g e n e r a l

i m p l i c a t i o n i n v o l v e d , n o t a person ' s say ing someth ing ( u n d e r c i r c u m s t a n c e s

C) , n o t J o h n ' s s a y in g s o m e th in g ( u n d e r c i r c u m s t a n c e s C ) , b u t J o h n ' s s a y i n g

s o m e t h i n g a b o u t t h e w e a t h e r ( u n d e r c i r c u m s t a n c e s C ) .

2 . T h e P o s s ib i li t y o f M i s ta k e : T h e C o n n e c ti o n B e tw e e n (2 ) a n d (3) .

T a k i n g a c u e f r o m t h e f a c t t h a t (2 ) e x p re s se s so m e f o r m o f n e c e s s ar y r e -

l a t io n s h i p b e t w e e n R a n d P , I h a v e ( in m y o p e n i n g r e m a r k s ) e x p r e s s e d ( 2) a s:

G iv en R, -,~ ( ) ,-~ P (o r , a l t e r na t ive ly , ,,~ ( ) ( R . --~ P ) ) . I th in k the fu l l

j u s t i f ic a t i o n f o r e x p r e s s i n g ( 2 ) i n t h i s f a s h i o n l ie s i n t h e f a c t t h a t ( 2 ) a n d ( 3 )

a r e c o n t r a d i c t o r i e s , a n d s i n c e ( 3 ) m a y b e r e n d e r e d a s :

( 3 ) G i v e n R , ( ) ~ P ( o r , a l t e r n a t i v e l y , ( ) ( R . ,-~ P )

(2 ) m a y b e r e p re s e n t e d a s ' G iv e n R , ,,~ ( ) ,,~ P ' .

9

Page 11: Dretske, Fred. Conclusive Reasons

8/23/2019 Dretske, Fred. Conclusive Reasons

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dretske-fred-conclusive-reasons 11/23

   D  o  w  n   l  o  a   d  e   d   B  y  :   [   U  n   i  v  e  r  s   i   t  y  o   f   T  o  r  o  n   t  o   ]   A   t  :   1   5  :   1   0   1   1   M  a  y   2   0   0   7

F r e d D r e t s k e

T o s e e t h a t t h i s i s s o , i t s h o u l d b e n o t i c e d t h a t i n d e n y i n g t h e c o n n e c t i o n

b e t w e e n R a n d P e x p r e s s e d b y (2 ) w e d o n o t c o m m i t o u r se l v e s t o a n y t h i n g

a s s t r o n g a s :

( 4) R w o u l d b e t h e c a s e e v e n t h o u g h n o t - P w e r e th e c a s e.

(4) i s the c o n t ra ry o f ( 2 ), n o t i t s c o n t r a d i c t o r y , s i nc e b o t h ( 2) a n d ( 4 ) m a y

t u r n o u t f a ls e , n F o r e x a m p l e , s u p p o s e S a s s e r t s ,

( 2g ) I w o u l d h a v e w o n t h e l o t t e r y i f I h a d b o u g h t t w o t i c k e t s ( i n s te a d

o f o n l y o n e ) .

W e m a y d e n y t h e t r u t h o f t hi s c o n t e n ti o n w i t h o u t c o m m i t t i n g o u r s e lv e s to

t h e t r u t h o f

( 4g ) Y o u w o u l d h a v e lo s t e v e n i f y o u h a d b o u g h t t w o t i c k et s .

A l l t h a t i s i n t e n d e d i n d e n y i n g (2 g ) i s t h a t t h e p u r c h a s e o f t w o t i c k e t s i s c o n -n e c t e d w i t h w i n n i n g in t h e a l le g e d m a n n e r , t h a t t h e p u r c h a s e o f tw o t i c k e t s

w o u l d h a v e a s s u r e d h i m o f w i n n i n g . I t s f a il in g t o b e c o n n e c t e d i n t h e

m a n n e r a l l e g e d i s , h o w e v e r , q u i t e c o n s i s t e n t w i t h h i s winn ing w i t h t w o t i c k e t s .W h a t w e c o m m i t o u r s e l v e s t o i n d e n y i n g ( 2 g ) i s :

( 3 g ) Y o u m i g h t h a v e l o s t e v e n w i t h t w o t i c k e t s .

(3 g ) a s s e r t s w h a t (2 g ) d e n i e s ; viz . t h a t e v e n w i t h t w o t i c k e t s it i s s t i l l a m a t t e r

o f c h a n c e , t h e p o s s i b i l i ty o f l o s i n g i s n o t e l im i n a t e d b y h o l d i n g t w o t i c k e ts

i n s t e a d o f o n e .

A s a m a t t e r o f c o m m o n p r a c t ic e , o f c ou r se , w e o ft e n e m p l o y s o m e t h i n g

s i m i l a r t o (4 ) i n d e n y i n g (2 ). T h i s i s u n d e r s t a n d a b l e e n o u g h s i n c e t h e t r u t h

o f ( 4~ d o e s e n t a i l t h e fa l si ty o f ( 2 ) . T h e p o i n t I a m d r i v i n g a t , h o w e v e r , is t h a t

w e n e e d n o t a f f i rm a n y t h i n g a s s t r o n g a s ( 4 ) i n d e n y i n g ( 2 ) ; a ll w e a r e r e q u i r e d

t o a f fi r m i s t h a t R a n d n o t - P m i g h t b o t h b e t h e ca s e o r t h a t , e v e n t h o u g h R

i s g i v e n , P m i g h t n o t b e th e ca s e. T h a t is t o s ay , t h e p r o p e r e x p r e s s io n f o r

t h e n e g a t i o n o f (2 ) is ( 3 ) ; a n d i f w e u n d e r s t a n d ( 3) a s a f f ir m i n g ' G i v e n R ,

( ) -~ P ' ( a l te r n a t i v e ly ( ) ( R . ,-~ P ) ) , t h e n w e a r e j u s ti f ie d i n r e p r e s e n t i n g

( 2 ) a s ' G i v e n R , N ( ) ~ p ' ( a l t e r n a t iv e l y , -,~ ( ) ( R . ,-~ P ) ) . I f s o m e o n e

s a ys , ' J a m e s w o u l d n o t h a v e c o m e w i t h o u t a n i n v i ta t io n ' , w e c a n d e n y t h is

w i t h o u t s u p p o s i n g t h a t J a m e s w o u l d h a v e c o m e w i t h o u t a n i n v it a ti o n .

F o r s u p p o s e w e k n o w t h a t i f J a m e s h a d n o t r e c ei ve d a n i n v it a ti o n , h e w o u l d

h a v e f l ip p e d a c o i n t o d e c id e w h e t h e r t o g o o r n o t . I n s u c h a c a s e , i t is n o t

t r u e t h a t h e w o u l d n o t h a v e c o m e w i t h o u t a n i n v i t a ti o n , b u t n e i t h e r is i t

t r u e t h a t h e w o u l d h a v e c o m e w i t h o u t a n i n v i ta t io n . T h e f a c t is t h a t h e

m i g h t h a v e c o m e ( d e p e n d i n g o n t h e o u t c o m e o f th e t o s s) w i t h o u t a n i n v i t a ti o n .

B e f o r e p r o c e e d i n g t h e r e is a n i m p o r t a n t a m b i g u i t y w h i ch m u s t b e e l i m in -

a te d . T h e r e is a u s e o f t h e w o r d ' m i g h t ' ( a n d r e la t ed m o d a l t e r m s ) w h i c h

g iv e s e x p r e ss i o n t o t h e s p e a k e r ' s e p is t e m i c s t a t e in r e l a t i o n t o s o m e s i t u a t io n .I t is a u s e o f th e w o r d ' m i g h t ' w h i c h i s n a t u r a l l y f o l l o w e d b y a p a r e n t h e t i c a l

' f o r a l l I k n o w ' . F o r e x a m p l e , i n sa y i n g , ' H e m i g h t w i n t h e e l e c t io n ' t h e

11 A point w hich Go od m an acknowledges in a footn ote: 'Literally a semifactual and thecorresponding counterfactual ar e not contradictories hu t contraries, an d b oth m ay befalse. ' F ac t, Fiction and Forecast, p. 32, note 2.

1 0

Page 12: Dretske, Fred. Conclusive Reasons

8/23/2019 Dretske, Fred. Conclusive Reasons

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dretske-fred-conclusive-reasons 12/23

   D  o  w  n   l  o  a   d  e   d   B  y  :   [   U  n   i  v  e  r  s   i   t  y  o   f   T  o  r  o  n   t  o   ]   A   t  :   1   5  :   1   0   1   1   M  a  y   2   0   0   7

Conc lus ive Reasons

s p e a k e r i s m o s t n a t u r a l l y u n d e r s t o o d a s e x p r e s s i n g t h e f a c t t h a t h e d o e s n o t

k no W w h e t h e r h e w il l w i n t h e e l e c ti o n o r n o t , t h a t h e h a s n o ( o r t h e r e a r e n o )

v e r y c o n v i n c i n g g r o u n d s f o r s u p p o s i n g h e w i ll l os e . T h i s u s e o f t h e w o r d c a n

p r o p e r l y b e d e p l o y e d e v e n w h e n t h e s t a te o f a ff a ir s i n q u e s t i o n i s phys ica l lyo r logically i m p o s s i b l e . S , f o r i n st a n c e, m a y c o n c e d e t h e p r e m i s e s o f o u r

v a l id a r g u m e n t b u t , n o n e t h e l e s s , i g n o r a n t o f i ts v a li d i ty , i n si s t t h a t t h e c o n -

c lu s io n m i g h t ( f o r a l l h e k n o w s ) b e f a ls e e v e n t h o u g h t h e p r e m i s e s a r e t r u e .

C o n t r a s t e d w i t h t hi s e p is t e m i c u s e o f t h e m o d a l t e r m s is w h a t w e m i g h t

ca l l an object ive s e n se o f t h e se t e r m s , a s e n s e o f t h e t e r m ' c o u l d ' ( f o r e x a m p l e )

in w h ic h i f R e n t a il s P t h en , i n d e p e n d e n t o f w h a t S k n o w s a b o u t t h e l o g i ca l

r e la t io n s h i p b e t w e e n R a n d P , i t is f a ls e t o s a y t h a t R a n d n o t - P c o u l d ( o r

m i g h t ) b o t h b e t h e c a s e. M o r e o v e r , i f w e a c c e p t t h e r e s u lt s o f m o d e r n

p h y s ic s , t h e n i n th i s o b j e c t i v e s e n s e o f t h e t e r m S ' s s t a t e m e n t t h a t t h e r e a r eo b j e c ts w h i c h can t r a v e l f a s t e r t h a n t h e s p e e d o f l ig h t i s f a ls e , a n d i t i s fa l s e

e v e n t h o u g h , f o r a l l h e k n o w s , t h e r e a r e o b j e c t s w h i c h c a n . I n t h i s o b j e c t i v e

s en s e o n e i s m a k i n g a r e m a r k a b o u t t h e v a r i o u s p o s s ib i li ti e s f o r th e o c c u r -

r e n c e, o r j o i n t o c c u r r e n c e , o f e v e n t s o r t h e c o - e x i s t e n c e o f s ta t e s o f a f f a ir s ,

a n d in t h is s e n s e ig n o r a n c e o f w h a t is t h e c a se is n o g u a r a n t e e t h a t o n e ' s

s t at e m e n ts a b o u t w h a t m i g h t o r cou ld b e t h e c a s e a r e t r u e . T h e p o s s i b i li t ie s

m u s t a c t u a l ly b e a s o n e al le g es . W h e n S ( k n o w i n g t h a t J a m e s h a d a n i n -

v i ta t io n t o c o m e ) a s s e r ts t h a t J a m e s , b e i n g th e s o r t o f f e ll o w h e i s, m i g h t

( e v e n ) h a v e c o m e w i t h o u t a n i n v i t a t i o n , h e i s m a k i n g a r e m a r k a b o u t J a m e sa n d w h a t J a m e s is i nc li n ed t o d o o r c a p a b l e o f d o i n g . H e is o b v i o u s l y n o t

r e g is te r in g s o m e f a c t a b o u t h i s i g n o r a n c e o f w h e t h e r o r n o t J a m e s p o s s e s se s

a n i n v i t a t i o n .

T h e m o d a l t e r m a p p e a r i n g i n ( 3) is m e a n t t o b e u n d e r s t o o d in th e o b j e c t iv e

s e ns e . ( 3) i s m e a n t t o b e a s t a t e m e n t a b o u t t h e p o s s ib i l it ie s f o r t h e j o i n t

r e a li z a ti o n o f tw o s t at e s o f a ff a ir s ( R a n d n o t - P ) i n d e p e n d e n t o f w h a t t h e

s p e a k e r h a p p e n s t o k n o w a b o u t t h e a c t u a l r e a l iz a t i o n o f P ( R b e i n g g i ve n ) .

D r a w i n g f r o m o u r d i s c u s s i o n i n t h e p r e c e d i n g s e c t i o n , w e c a n s a y t h a t i f

( 2) i s t r u e , i f R w o u l d n o t b e t h e c a s e u n le s s P w e r e t h e c a s e , t h e n in thesecircumstances ( sp e c i f i e d e a r l i e r ) P i s a s t a t e o f a f f a i r s w h i c h i s n e c e s s a ry t o

t h e r e a l i z a t i o n o f R . H e n c e , i n t h e s e c i r c u m s t a n c e s i t i s f a ls e t o s a y t h a t

R a n d n o t - P m i g h t b o t h b e t h e c a s e o r th a t , g i v e n R , n o t - P m i g h t b e th e c a s e ,

a n d i t i s f a ls e w h e t h e r o r n o t a n y o n e a p p r e c i a t e s t h e f a c t t h a t i t is f al se .

W e h a v e h e r e a m o r e o r l es s par t icu lar i zed i m p o ss i b i l i t y ; ( 3 ) , a s w e l l a s (2 ) ,

is t i e d t o t h e c i r c u m s t a n c e s , C , s p e c i f ie d e a r li e r . N o t h i n g e ls e b u t ( a s t a t e

s u c h as ) P c o u l d h a v e b r o u g h t a b o u t ( a s t a t e s u c h a s) R in these c ircumstan ces .O f t en , o f c o u rs e , o u r s t a t e m e n t s a b o u t w h a t c o u l d b e t h e c a se , a b o u t w h a t is

p o s s ib l e , a r e b r o a d e r i n sc o p e . T h e y d o n o t r e s tr i c t t h e m s e l v e s t o t h ep a r t i c u l a r s e t o f c i r c u m s t a n c e s p r e v a i li n g o n s o m e s p e ci fi c o c c a s i o n . T h e y

a r e s t a t e m e n t s t o t h e e f fe c t t h a t , w h a t e v e r t h e c i r c u m s t a n c e s o n t h is o c c a s i o n

h a p p e n e d t o b e , t h e r e a r e ( n o n e t h e l e s s ) c i r c u m s t a n c e s i n w h i c h a s t a t e

r e l e v a n tl y s i m i l a r t o R is , o r m i g h t e a s i ly b e , b r o u g h t a b o u t w i t h o u t a s t a t e

r e l e v a n t ly s i m i l a r t o P. S m a y a d m i t , f o r e x a m p l e , t h a t t h e t h e r m o m e t e r

w o u l d n o t h a v e r e a d 9 8.6 u nl es s t h e c h il d 's t e m p e r a t u r e w a s n o r m a l - - h e n c e ,

11

Page 13: Dretske, Fred. Conclusive Reasons

8/23/2019 Dretske, Fred. Conclusive Reasons

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dretske-fred-conclusive-reasons 13/23

   D  o  w  n   l  o  a   d  e   d   B  y  :   [   U  n   i  v  e  r  s   i   t  y  o   f   T  o  r  o  n   t  o   ]   A   t  :   1   5  :   1   0   1   1   M  a  y   2   0   0   7

F r e d D r e t s k e

c o n c e d e t h a t i t w o u l d b e f a l s e t o s a y t h a t i n t h e s e c i r c u m s t a n c e s ( g i v e n t h e

t h e r m o m e t e r r e a d in g ) th e c h il d m i g h t ( n o n e th e l e s s) h a v e a fe v e r . Y e t , h e

m a y g o o n t o i n s i s t t h a t o n e c a n g e t a n o r m a l r e a d i n g o n a t h e r m o m e t e r

w i t h a fe v e r is h c h i ld . O n e c a n d o s o w h e n o n e h a s a d e fe c t iv e t h e r m o m e t e r ,w h e n t h e c h i ld is s u c k i n g a n i c e c u b e , a n d s o o n . T h a t is , o n e c a n h a v e

R w i t h o u t P i n o t h e r c i r c u m s t a n c e s . T h e s e " g e n er a l' p o s s i b il i ti e s a re ,

h o w e v e r , q u i t e c o n s i s t e n t w i t h t h e ' p a r t i c u l a r i z e d " i m p o s s i b i l i t i e s e x p r e s s e d

b y ( 3 ). M o s t g e n u i n e i m p o s s i b i li t ie s c a n b e m a d e p o s s i b l e b y e n l a r g i n g t h ef r a m e o f r e f e r e n c e , b y r e la x i n g t h e c o n d i t i o n s t a c i tl y t a k e n a s f ix e d i n t h e

o r i g in a l s t a t e m e n t o f i m p o s s ib i li ty . I c a n ' t s w im t h e E n g l is h C h a n n e l ;

t h is d e s p it e t h e f a c t t h a t I c o u l d / f I h a d t r a i n e d s in c e a b o y , b e e n e n d o w e dw i t h t h e r e q u i s i t e e n d u r a n c e , e t c .

I f I m a y s u m m a r iz e t h e a r g u m e n t u p t o t hi s p o i n t in p r e p a r a t i o n f o r t h ef o l l o w i n g s e c t i o n : ( 1) e n t a il s (2 ) , i f S k n o w s t h a t P , a n d h e k n o w s t h i s o n t h e

b a s is ( s im p l y ) o f R , t h e n R w o u l d n o t b e t h e c a s e u n l e ss P w e r e th e c a s e .

F u r t h e r m o r e , ( 2 ) g iv e s e x p r e s s i o n t o a c 6 n n e c t i o n b e t w e e n R a n d P w h i c h

p e r m i t s u s t o s a y t h a t w h e n R i s g i v e n, in t h e k i n d o f c ir c u m s t a n c e s w h i c h

a c t u a l l y p r e v a i l e d o n t h e o c c a s i o n i n q u e s t i o n , t h e p o s s i b i l i t y o f n o t - P i s

e l i m i n a t e d . T h e s en s e o f t h e w o r d ' p o s s i b l e ' t h a t i s o p e r a t i v e h e r e is , I

s u b m i t , t h e s a m e s e n se o f t h is w o r d t h a t i s o p e r a t i n g i n o u r s t r o n g e s t s t a t e -

m e n t s a b o u t w h a t is p h y s i c a l l y p o s s i b l e ; t h e d i f f e re n c e b e t w e e n t h e p o s s i b i l it y

e x p r e s s e d i n (3 ) a n d o t h e r , a p p a r e n t l y s t r o n g e r , s t a t e m e n t s o f w h a t i s p o s s i b l ea n d i m p o s s i b l e i s s i m p l y a s h i f t i n t h e s e t o f c i r c u m s t a n c e s w h i c h i s t a k e n a s

f ix e d . T h e i m p o s s i b i l i ty e x p r e s s e d b y ( 3 ) i s a n i m p o s s i b i l i ty r e l a t i v e t o t h o s e

c i r c u m s t a n c e s , C , h e l d f i x e d i n ( 2 ) , a n d i t i s t h i s f a c t w h i c h m a k e s ( 3 ) t h e

c o n t r a d i c t o r y o f (2 ) a n d , h e n c e , w h i c h m a k e s it s n e g a t i o n a l o g i ca l c o n s e -q u e n c e o f ( 1 ) .

3 . C o n c l u s i v e R e a s o n s

L e t u s c al l R a c o n c l u s i v e r e a s o n f o r P i f a n d o n l y i f R w o u l d n o t b e t h e

c a s e u n l e s s P w e r e t h e c a se . 12 T h i s m a k e s l o g i c a ll y c o n c l u s i v e r e a s o n s( L C R ) a s u b c la s s o f c o n c l u s iv e r e a s o n s. C o n c l u s i v e r e a s o n s d e p e n d ,

s i m p l y , o n t h e t r u t h o f ( 2 ) ; l o g i c a l l y c o n c l u s i v e r e a s o n s r e q u i r e t h a t t h et r u t h o f (2 ) b e d e m o n s t r a b l e o n p u r e l y l o g i c al a n d d e f i n it i o n a l g r o u n d s .

W h e n t h e c o n d i t i o n a l is tr u e , b u t n o t l o g i c al ly t r u e , w e c a n s p e a k o f th e

c o n c l u s i v e r e a s o n s a s b e i n g e m p i r i c a l l y c o n c l u s i v e ( E C R ) .

O f c o u rs e , R m a y b e a c o n c l u s iv e r e a s o n f o r b e li e vi n g P w i t h o u t a n y o n eb e l ie v i n g P , m u c h l e ss h a v i n g R a s t h e i r r e a s o n f o r b e l ie v i n g . I sh a l l s a y ,

t h e r e f o r e , t h a t S h a s c o n c l u s iv e r e a s o n s , R , f o r b e l i e v in g P i f a n d o n l y i f :

(A) R i s a c o n c lu s iv e r e a s o n fo r P ( i. e. ( 2 ) i s t r u e ) ,( B ) S b e l ie v e s , w i t h o u t d o u b t , r e s e r v a t i o n , o r q u e s t i o n , t h a t P i s t h e

c a s e a n d h e b e li ev e s t h is o n t h e b a s is o f R ,

12 R eca ll footnote 5 concerning the particular wording o f (2); I intend those rem arks toapply to this d efinition o f 'conclusive reasons'.

1 2

Page 14: Dretske, Fred. Conclusive Reasons

8/23/2019 Dretske, Fred. Conclusive Reasons

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dretske-fred-conclusive-reasons 14/23

   D  o  w  n   l  o  a   d  e   d   B  y  :   [   U  n   i  v  e  r  s   i   t  y  o   f   T  o  r  o  n   t  o   ]   A   t  :   1   5  :   1   0   1   1   M  a  y   2   0   0   7

C o n c l u s i v e R e a s o n s

( (2 ) ( i ) S k n o w s t h a t R i s t h e c a s e o r

( ii ) R i s s o m e e x p e r i m e n t a l s t a te o f S ( a b o u t w h i c h i t m a y n o t

m a k e s en s e t o s u p p o s e t h a t S k n o w s t h a t R i s t h e c a s e ; a t

l e a s t i t n o l o n g e r m a k e s m u c h s e ns e t o a s k h o w h e k n o w s ) .

W i th o n l y m i n o r e m b e l l i s h m e n t s , t o b e m e n t i o n e d i n a m o m e n t , I b e l ie v e

t h a t S ' s h a v i n g c o n c l u s i v e r e a s o n s f o r b e l i e v i n g P i s b o t h a n e c e s s a r y a n d a

s uf fi ci en t c o n d i t i o n f o r h i s k n o w i n g t h a t P is t h e c a s e . T h e a p p e a r a n c e o f

t he w o r d ' k n o w ' i n th i s c h a r a c t e r i z a t i o n ( in (C i ) ) d o e s n o t r e n d e r i t c i r c u l a r

a s a c h a r a c t e r i z a t i o n o f k n o w l e d g e s i n c e i t c a n b e e l i m i n a t e d b y a r e c u r s i v e

a p p l i c a t i o n o f t h e t h r e e c o n d i t i o n s u n t i l ( C i i ) is r e a c h e d .

I f S h a s c o n c l u s i v e r e a s o n s f o r b e l i e v i n g P , t h e n i t i s f a l s e t o s a y t h a t ,

g iv e n t h e s e g r o u n d s f o r b e li e f, a n d t h e c i r c u m s t a n c e s i n w h i c h t h e s e g r o u n d s

s e r v ed a s t h e b a s i s f o r h i s b e l i e f , S m i g h t b e m i s t a k e n a b o u t P . H a v i n g c o n -

c l u si v e r e a s o n s , a s I h a v e j u s t d e f i n e d i t , n o t o n l y i m p l i e s t h a t P i s t h e c a s e ,

i t n o t o n l y i m p l i e s t h a t S b e l i e v e s t h a t P i s t h e c a s e , b u t i t a l s o i m p l i e s t h a t ,

in t h e c i r c u m s t a n c e s i n w h i c h h e c a m e t o b e l i e v e t h a t P , h i s b a s is f o r b e -

l ie v i n g t h a t P w a s s u f f ic i e n tl y s e c u r e t o e l i m i n a t e t h e p o s s i b i l i t y o f h i s b e i n g

m i s t a k e n a b o u t P . T h i s g o e s a l o n g w a y t o w a r d c a p t u r i n g e v e r y t h i n g t h a t

p h i l o s o p h e r s h a v e t r a d i t i o n a l l y r e q u i r e d o f k n o w l e d g e . I n d e e d , i n c e r t a i n

r e sp e c ts i t g o e s b e y o n d i t i n r e q u i r i n g a s t r o n g e r c o n n e c t o n b e t w e e n o n e ' s

r e a s o n s o r g r o u n d s a n d w h a t o n e b e l i ev e s ( o n t h e b a s i s o f t h e s e r e a s o n s o r

g r o u n d s ) t h a n h a s n o r m a l l y b e e n d e m a n d e d b y t h o s e w i s h i n g t o p r e s e r v e o u r

o r d i n a r y k n o w l e d g e c l a i m s f r o m s c e p t ic a l c r i t i c i s m , la S i n ce , h o w e v e r , I

h a v e a l r e a d y a r g u e d f o r t h e n e c e s s i t y o f ( A ) , f o r R ' s b e i n g a c o n c l u s i v e

r e a s o n f o r P , I s h a l l c o n c e n t r a t e o n t h e q u e s t i o n o f w h e t h e r o r n o t S ' s h a v i n g

a c o n c l u s i v e r e a s o n f o r b e l i e v i n g P i s s u f f i c ie n t f o r h i s k n o w i n g t h a t P .

13 I t i s t h i s s t ro n g e r co n n ec t i o n w h i ch b l o ck s t h e s o r t o f co u n t e rex am p l e wh i ch can b eg en e ra t ed t o ju s t i fi ed - t ru e -b e l i e f an a l y s es o f k n o wl ed g e . G e t t i e r ' s ( an d L eh re r ' s )

ex am p l es , fo r i n s tan ce , a r e d i r ec t ed a t t h o s e an a l y s es wh i ch co n s t ru e k n o wl ed g e i nt e rm s o f a degree of jus t i f i ca t ion wh ich i s co m pat ib le wi th be ing jus t i f i ed in b e l iev ings o m e t h i n g fa l se (b o t h G e t t i e r an d L eh re r m en t i o n t h i s f ea t u re a t t h e b eg i n n in g o f t h e i rd iscussion). Th e coun terexam ples a re then con s t ruc ted by a l low ing S to be l ieve tha t P(which is false) with the appropriate degree o f justif ication, l e t t ing P en ta i l Q (which i st ru e ) , an d l e t t in g S b e li ev e t h a t Q o n t h e b as i s o f i ts lo g i ca l r e l a t i o n s h i p t o P . W e h av e ,then, a case where S t ru ly bel ieves that Q with the appropriate degree o f justif ication( th i s d eg ree o f j u s t if i ca t io n i s a l leg ed l y p re s e rv ed t h ro u g h t h e en t a i lm en t b e t ween P an dQ) , b u t a ca s e wh e re S d o es not know t h a t Q ( s in ce h i s m ean s o f a r r i v i n g a s i t w e re s oc lear ly defec tive). O n the p resen t ana lys i s , o f course , the requ i red conn ect ion be tweenS ' s ev i d en ce an d P i s st ro n g en o u g h t o preclude P ' s b e in g f a ls e . On e can n o t h av e con-clusive r ea s o n s fo r b e l i ev i n g s o m e t h i n g wh i ch is f al se . Hen ce , t h i s s o r t o f co u n t e r -ex am p l e can n o t b e g en e ra ted . Pa r t o f th e m o t i v a t i o n fo r t h e p re s en t an a ly s i s i s t h eco n v i c t io n ( s u p p o r t ed b y Ge t t ie r - l i k e ex am p l es ) t h a t k n o wl ed g e , i f i t em b o d i e s an ev i -d en t i a l r e l a t i o n a t a l l , m u s t e m b o d y a s t ro n g en o u g h o n e t o e l i m i n a t e t h e possibilityo f m i s t ak e . See E d m u n d G e t t i e r ' s ' I s Ju s t if i ed T ru e B e l i e f K n o w l ed g e? ' Analysis,2 3.6 , J u n e 1 9 6 3 an d Ke i t h L eh re r , 'Kn o wl ed g e , T ru t h an d E v i d en ce ' , Analysis, 25.5,A p r i l 1 96 5. I s h o u l d a l s o m en t i o n h e re t h a t t h e s e s am e s o r t s o f co n s i d e ra t i o n s s eem edto m ove B r ian Sk yrm s tow ard a s im i la r ana lys i s ; see espec ia l ly pp . 385-86 in h i s 'T heE x p l ic a ti on o f " X K n o w s T h a t P " ' The Journal o f Philosophy, June 22, 1967.

21 3

Page 15: Dretske, Fred. Conclusive Reasons

8/23/2019 Dretske, Fred. Conclusive Reasons

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dretske-fred-conclusive-reasons 15/23

   D  o  w  n   l  o  a   d  e   d   B  y  :   [   U  n   i  v  e  r  s   i   t  y  o   f   T  o  r  o  n   t  o   ]   A   t  :   1   5  :   1   0   1   1   M  a  y   2   0   0   7

Fred Dretske

S e v e ra l p r e l i m i n a r y p o i n t s m u s t b e m e n t i o n e d b ri ef ly . I t m a y b e t h o u g h t

t h a t i n a r g u i n g f o r t h e i m p o s s i b il i ty o f m i s t a k e a s a n e c e s s a r y c o n d i t i o n f o rk n o w i n g t h a t P I h a ve be e n w a s t i n g m y ti m e . I t m a y b e th o u g h t t h a t i f S

k n o w s t h a t P , t h e n P cannot b e f a l s e s i n c e S ' s k n o w i n g t h a t P e n t a i l s P ;h e n c e , S cannot b e m i s t a k e n in b e l i e v in g t h a t P . I n a n s w e r t o th i s o b j e c t i o ni t s h o u l d b e p o i n t e d o u t t h a t t h e i m p o s s ib i l it y o f m i s t a k e w h i c h I h a v e b e e nt a l k i n g a b o u t i s a n i m p o s s i b i l i ty w h i c h a r i s e s i n v i r t u e o f a special connection

b e t w e e n S ' s r e a s o n s , R , a n d w h a t h e c o n s e q u e n t l y b e l ie v e s , P . I t is n o t t h et ri v ia l i m p o s s ib i li ty o f b e i n g w r o n g a b o u t s o m e t h i n g w h i c h ( b y h y p o t h e s i s )

y o u k n o w . W h e n p h i l o s o p h e r s c o n c e r n t h e m s e lv e s w i t h th e p o s s ib i l it y o fm i s t a k e i n p u t a t i v e c a se s o f k n o w l e d g e , t h e y a re n o t c o n c e r n e d w i t h t h ep o s s ib i li ty o f m i s t a k e w h i c h is t ri v i a ll y a v o i d a b l e b y s a y in g t h a t / f y o u d o

k n o w t h a t P, t h e n y o u c a n n o t b e m i s t a k e n a b o u t P . T h e y a r e c o n c e r n e d ,r a t h e r , w i t h t h a t p o s s i b i l i ty a s i t e x is t s i n r e l a t i o n t o o n e ' s e v i d e n c e o r g r o u n d sf o r b e l ie v i n g P , a n d that i s t h e p o s s i b i l i t y w i t h w h i c h ( 2 ) i s c o n c e r n e d .

T h e p o i n t m a y be p u t in a n o t h e r w a y . B o t h

I . R w o u l d n o t b e t h e c a s e u n l e ss P w e r e t h e c a se

R i s t h e c a s ea n d

I I . R ~ P (w h e n i t i s not t r u e t h a t R w o u l d n o t b e t h e c a s e u n le s s P )R

c o n s t i t u t e c o n c l u s i v e g r o u n d s , l o g i c a l ly c o n c l u s i v e g r o u n d s , f o r b e l ie v i n g P .

N e i t h e r s e t o f p r e m i s e s w o u l d b e t r u e u n l e ss P w e r e t r u e , a n d t h i s f a c t is i n

b o t h c a s es d e m o n s t r a b l e o n p u r e l y l o g ic a l a n d d e f in i ti o n a l g r o u n d s . B u t t h e

s i g n if i ca n t d if f e r e n c e b e t w e e n I a n d I I i s t h a t i n I , b u t not i n I I , t h e s e c o n d

p r e m i s e alone t u r n s o u t t o b e a conclusive r e a s o n (E C R ) . I f w e w e r e s e a r c h in g

f o r c o n c l u s i v e r e a s o n s t o b e l ie v e P , t h e n i n t h e s e c o n d c a s e w e w o u l d r e q u i r e

a s o u r r e a s o n s both premises, a n d t h i s w o u l d r e q u i r e t h a t w e k n e w t h a t b o t h

p r e m i s e s w e r e t r u e ( s ee c l a u s e ( C ) i n h a v i n g c o n c l u s i v e r e a s o n s ) . I n c a s e I ,

h o w e v e r , th e s e c o n d p r e m i s e a l o n e is a c o n c l u s i v e r e a s o n a n d , h e n c e , t o h a v ec o n c l u s i v e r e a s o n s i t i s r e q u i r e d only that we know that R is the case. W e

n e e d n o t ( a s i n c a s e I I ) k n o w t h a t t h e f i rs t p r e m i s e i s t r u e . A l l t h a t is r e -

q u i r e d i n c a s e I f o r R a l o n e t o b e a c o n c l u s i v e r e a s o n is t h a t t h e f i rs t p r e m i s eb e t r u e ; t h e r e is n o t h i n g t h a t r e q u i r e s S to k n o w t h a t t h e f ir s t p r e m i s e i s t r u e

i n o r d e r t o h a v e R a s h i s c o n c l u s i v e r e a s o n f o r b e l ie v i n g P . F o r i f t h e f i rs tp r e m i s e is t r u e ( r e g a r d l es s o f w h e t h e r S k n o w s i t is t r u e o r n o t ) t h e n ( 3 ) i s

f a l s e ; h e n c e , t h e p o s s i b i l i t y o f S ' s b e i n g m i s t a k e n a b o u t P h a s b e e n s u c c e s s -

f u ll y a v o i d e d - - a n d i t h a s b e e n s u c c e ss f u ll y a v o i d e d whether or not S knowsit has been avoided.

I n s p e a k i n g o f c o n c l u s i v e r e a s o n s I d o n o t w i s h t o s u g g e s t t h a t i n h a v i n g R

a s a c o n c l u s i v e r e a s o n S m u s t b e i n a p o s i t i o n t o give R a s h i s r e a s o n . Rm a y s i m p l y b e a c e r t a i n e x p e ri e n c e w h i c h S h a s u n d e r g o n e a n d , h a v i n g u n d e r -

g o n e t h i s e x p e r ie n c e , c o m e t o t h e b e l i e f t h a t P w a s t h e c a s e o n t h e b a si s o f

( a s a r e s u l t o f ) t h i s e x p e r i e n c e . H e m a y f i n d i t d i f fi c u lt , o r imp o s s ib l e , t og iv e v e r b a l e x p r es s io n t o R . H e m a y h av e f o r g o t t e n R . O r R m a y c o n s is t

1 4

Page 16: Dretske, Fred. Conclusive Reasons

8/23/2019 Dretske, Fred. Conclusive Reasons

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dretske-fred-conclusive-reasons 16/23

   D  o  w  n   l  o  a   d  e   d   B  y  :   [   U  n   i  v  e  r  s   i   t  y  o   f   T  o  r  o  n   t  o   ]   A   t  :   1   5  :   1   0   1   1   M  a  y   2   0   0   7

Conclusive Reasons

in s o m e t h i n g ' s l o o k i n g a p a r t i c u l a r w a y t o h i m w h i c h h e f in d s d if f i cu l t t o

d e s c ri b e. S til l, i f t h e w a y th e t h i n g l o o k s t o S i s s u c h t h a t i t w o u l d n o t l o o k

t h a t w a y u n le s s i t h a d t h e p r o p e r t y Q , t h e n i t s l o o k i n g t h a t w a y t o S is a

c o n c l u si v e r e a s o n f o r S ' s b e l ie v i n g t h a t i t h a s t h e p r o p e r t y Q ; a n d i f Sb e l i e v e s t h a t i t i s Q on this basis, t h e n h e h a s , i n t h e w a y t h e t h i n g l o o k s t o

h i m , a c o n c l u s i v e r e a s o n f o r b e l i e v in g i t Q .

A l s o , t h e re a r e a n u m b e r o f t h in g s w h i c h p e o p l e c o m m o n l y p r o fe s s t o k n o w

( S a c r a m e n t o i s t h e c a p i t a l o f C a l i f o r n i a , t h e e a r t h is r o u g h l y s p h e r i c a l ) f o r

w h i c h t h e r e is n o d e f in i te p i e c e o f e v id e n c e , n o s in g l e s t a te o f a f f a ir s o r e a s i ly

s p e ci fi a bl e s e t o f s u c h s t a te s , w h i c h e v e n a p p r o x i m a t e s a c o n c l u s i v e r e a s o n .

I n s u c h c as e s, a l t h o u g h w e c a n c it e n o s in g le p ie c e o f d a t a w h i c h i s c l in c h i n g

a n d , h e n c e , a r e a t a lo s s f o r c o n c l u s i v e r e a s o n s w h e n a s k e d t o g i v e re a s o n s

( or w h e n a s k ed ' H o w d o y o u k n o w ? ' ) w e , n o n et he le s s , o f te n e n o u g h h a v ec o n c lu s iv e r e a s o n s i n a v a s t s p e c t r u m o f ex p e r ie n c e s w h i c h a r e t o o d i v e rs e

t o a d m i t o f c o n v e n i e n t c it a t i o n . C o u n t l e ss e x p e ri e n ce s c o n v e r g e , s o t o s p e a k ,

o n th e t r u t h o f a g iv e n p r o p o s i t i o n , a n d t h is v a r i e ty o f e x p e r ie n c e m a y b e

s u ch t h a t a l t h o u g h o n e may h a v e h a d a n y one o f th e s e e x p e r ie n c e s w i t h o u t

t he p r o p o s i t i o n i n q u e s t i o n b e i n g t r u e , o n e would not h a v e h a d a / / o f t h e m

u n le s s w h a t o n e c o n s e q u e n t l y b el ie v e s w a s t ru e . T h e f a ll ib i li ty o f s o u r c e A

a n d t h e f a ll ib i li ty o f s o u r c e B d o e s n o t a u t o m a t i c a l l y e n t a il t h a t w h e n A a n d

B agree a b o u t P ' s b e i n g t h e c a s e , t h a t , n o n e t h e l e s s , P m i g h t s ti ll b e f a ls e .

F o r i t m a y b e t h a t A a n d B would not b o t h h a v e i n d i c a t e d t h a t P w a s t h e c a s e

u n le s s P w a s t h e c a s e a l t h o u g h n e i t h e r A n o r B , t a k e n b y th e m s e l v e s , p r o v i d e

c o n c l u s iv e r e a s o n s f o r P . F o r e x a m p l e , a l t h o u g h a n y s in g le n e w s p a p e r

a c c o u n t m a y b e i n e r r o r o n a p a r t i c u l a r p o i n t , s e v e ra l i n d e p e n d e n t v e r s i o n s

( w ir e se rv ic e s, o f c o u r se , t e n d t o e l i m i n a te t h is i n d e p e n d e n c e ) m a y b e e n o u g h

t o sa y t h a t w e k n o w t h a t s o m e t h i n g is so on the basis of the newspaper accounts.

A l l o f t h e m w o u l d n o t h a v e b e e n i n s u c h c lo s e a g r e e m e n t u n le s s t h ei r a c c o u n t

w a s s u b s t a n t i a l l y c o r r e c t . 14

F i n al ly , I d o n o t w i sh t o s u g g es t b y m y u s e o f t h e w o r d ' r e a s o n ' t h a t w h e n

S h a s c o n c l u s i v e r e a s o n s f o r b e l i e v i n g P , S h a s reasoned h is w a y t o t h e c o n -

c l u si o n th a t P is t h e c a s e f r o m p r e m i s e s i n v o l v i n g R o r t h a t S h a s c o n s c i o u s l y

u s e d R a s a r e a s o n i n a r r i v i n g a t t h e b e l i e f t h a t P . I a m i n c l i n e d t o t h i n k

( b u t I s h a ll n o t n o w a r g u e it ) t h a t w h e n o n e k n o w s t h a t P , o n w h a t e v e r b a s is

t hi s m i g h t b e , l it tl e o r n o r e a s o n i n g is i n v o l v e d . I w o u l d p r e f e r t o d e s c r i b e

i t a s f o l lo w s : s o m e t i m e s a p e r s o n ' s c o n v i c t i o n t h a t P i s t h e c a s e c a n b e

t r a c e d t o a s t a te o f a f fa i rs ( o r c l u s t e r o f s i t u a t io n s ) w h i c h s a ti sf ie s t h e t h r e e

c o n d i t i o n s d e f i n in g t h e p o s s e s s i o n o f c o n c l u s i v e r e a s o n s . W h e n i t c a n b e s o

t ra c e d , t h e n h e k n o w s ; w h e n i t c a n n o t b e s o t ra c e d , t h e n w e s a y h e d o e s n o t

14 T he fa ct tha t all newspapers sometimes prin t things wh ich are false does no t m ean tha twe can not kn ow that something is t rue o n the basis o f a s ingle newspaper accou nt .Th e relevant quest ion to ask (as in the case of a perso n's test im ony --see sect ion 1) is n otwhether newspapers sometimes prin t false stories, n ot even whether this newspaper some-times prints fa lse stories, bu t whe ther this newspaperwould have printed this story if i t wereno t t rue. T he Midville Weekly Gazette's s tory about dope addic t ion on the campusm ay not correspond wi th the facts , bu t wo uld The Times have printed this s tory aboutthe President 's visit to M oscow if i t were no t true ?

1 5

Page 17: Dretske, Fred. Conclusive Reasons

8/23/2019 Dretske, Fred. Conclusive Reasons

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dretske-fred-conclusive-reasons 17/23

   D  o  w  n   l  o  a   d  e   d   B  y  :   [   U  n   i  v  e  r  s   i   t  y  o   f   T  o  r  o  n   t  o   ]   A   t  :   1   5  :   1   0   1   1   M  a  y   2   0   0   7

Fred Dretske

k n o w a l t h o u g h h e m a y b e r i g h t a b o u t P ' s b e in g t h e ca se . O f c o u r se , his

b e l ie f m a y b e traceable t o s u c h a s o u r c e w i t h o u t o u r b e i n g a b l e t o t r a c e i t .

I n s u c h a c a s e w e a r e m i s t a k e n i n s a y i n g th a t h e d o e s n o t k n o w .

T u r n i n g n o w t o t h e q u e s t io n o f w h e t h e r h a v i n g c o n cl u si v e re a s o n s t ob e l ie v e , a s d e f in e d b y ( A ) - ( C ) , c o n s t i t u t e s a s u f f ic ie n t c o n d i t i o n f o r k n o w l e d g e ,

I s h a ll m e n t i o n a n d b r i e f ly r e s p o n d t o w h a t I c o n s i d e r t o b e t h e m o s t s e r i o u s

o b j e c t i o n s t o t h i s p r o p o s a l .

T h e r e is , f ir st , a t e n d e n c y t o c o n f l a t e k n o w i n g t h a t P w i th k n o w i n g t h a t o n e

k n o w s t h a t P . I f t h is is d o n e t h e n c o n d i t io n s ( A ) - ( C ) w i ll i m m e d i a t e l y a p p e a r

i n s u f f i c i e n t s i n c e t h e y d o n o t d e s c r i b e S a s k n o w i n g o r h a v i n g a n y b a s i s f o r

b e l i e v in g t h a t R , h i s b a s i s f o r b e l i e v i n g P , c o n s t i t u t e s a n a d e q u a t e b a s i s , m u c h

l es s a c o n c l u s i v e b a s i s , f o r b e l i e v in g P . E v e n i f o n e d o e s n o t g o t h is f a r t h e r e

is s ti ll a t e n d e n c y t o s a y t h a t i f S k n o w s t h a t P , t h e n S m u s t a t l e a s t believet h a t h e k n o w s t h a t P is t h e c a s e. I f o n e a d o p t s th i s v i e w t h e n , o n c e a g a in ,

c o n d i t i o n s ( A ) - ( C ) a p p e a r i n a d e q u a t e s in c e t h e y d o n o t d e s c r i b e ( n o r d o t h e y

e n t a il ) t h a t S b e l i e v e s h e k n o w s t h a t P is t h e c as e . I s e e n o r e a s o n , h o w e v e r ,

t o a c c e p t e i th e r o f t h e se c la im s . W e n a t u r a l l y e x p e c t o f o n e w h o k n o w s t h a t

P t h a t h e b e li e ve t h a t h e k n o w s , j u s t a s w e e x p e c t o f s o m e o n e w h o is r i d in g a

b i c y c l e t h a t h e b e l i e v e h e is ri d i n g o n e , b u t i n n e i t h e r c a s e i s th e b e l i e f a

necessary a c c o m p a n i m e n t . T h e c o n f u s i o n is p a r t i a l ly f o s t e r e d , I b e li e v e,

b y a f a i l u r e t o d i s t i n g u i s h b e t w e e n w h a t i s i m p l i e d i n k n o w i n g t h a t P , a n d

w h a t i s i m p l i e d ( i n s o m e s e n s e ) b y s o m e o n e ' s saying h e k n o w s t h a t P . C o n -s id e r , h o w e v e r , c a s e s in w h i c h w e f r e e l y a s c r i b e k n o w l e d g e t o a g e n t s i n w h i c h

i t s ee m s q u i t e i m p l a u s i b l e t o a s s i g n t h e l e v e l o f c o n c e p t u a l s o p h i s t i c a ti o n

r e q u i s i t e t o t h e i r b e l i e v i n g s o m e t h i n g a b o u t k n o w l e d g e , b e l i e v i n g s o m e t h i n g

a b o u t th e i r e p i s te m i c r e l a t io n t o th e s t a te o f a f fa i rs i n q u e s t io n . A d o g m a y

k n o w t h a t h i s m a s t e r i s i n t h e r o o m , a n d I ( a t l e a s t ) w a n t t o s a y t h a t h e c a n

k n o w t h i s i n a s t r a i g h t f o r w a r d s e n s e w i t h o u t ( n e c e s s a ri ly ) p o s s e s s i n g t h e

c o n c e p t u a l u n d e r s t a n d i n g w h i c h s e e m s t o b e r e q u ir e d t o s a y o f h i m t h a t h e

b e li ev e s h e k n o w s t h is , b e l ie v e s t h a t h e h a s g o o d r e a s o n s , o r b e l ie v e s anything

a b o u t h i s e p i s t e m i c r e l a t io n t o t h e f a c t t h a t h is m a s t e r i s in t h e r o o m . x5Y e t , i t s e e m s p e r f e c t l y n a t u r a l t o s a y o f a d o g t h a t i t k n o w s ( s o m e t i m e s ) w h e n

h is m a s t e r i s i n t h e r o o m . A n d t h is is n o t , l et m e a d d , s i m p l y a m a t t e r o f t h e

d o g ' s b e in g ri g h t a b o u t s o m e t h i n g . F o r i f w e k n e w th a t t h e d o g t h o u g h t h i s

m a s t e r w a s i n th e r o o m o n t h e b a s is , s a y , o f c e r t a i n s o u n d s a n d s m e l ls ( s o u n d s

a n d s m e l l s t h a t w e r e , g e n e r a l l y s p e a k i n g , a r e l i a b l e s i g n o f h is m a s t e r ) w h e n

t h e s e s o u n d s a n d s m e l ls w e r e t o t a l ly u n r e l a t e d t o h i s m a s t e r ' s p r e s e n c e in t h e

r o o m on this occasion, w e w o u l d n o t s a y t h e d o g k n e w e v e n if h e h a p p e n e d

t o b e r i g ht a b o u t his m a s t e r ' s b e i n g in t h e r o o m . I m a g i n e a bl in d d o g ' s

b e i n g ' t a k e n i n ' b y a t h i e f in h is m a s t e r ' s c l o th i n g w h i l e th e m a s t e r l ie s u n -c o n s c i o u s i n t h e c o r n e r . T h e d o g , t a k e n i n a s h e is b y th e t h ie f , c e r t a i n l y

t h i n k s h i s m a s t e r is in t h e r o o m , a n d h e is r i g h t ( a lt h o u g h , o f c o u r se , h e i s

15 This seems to be the essence of A rthur D anto 's argument (against H intikka) th a t ' Sknows that P ' does not entai l 'S knows that S knows that P ' in 'On Knowing that WeKnow' , Epistemology: New Essays in the Theory of Knowledge, Avrum Stroll (ed.),1967, pp . 4 9-51.

1 6

Page 18: Dretske, Fred. Conclusive Reasons

8/23/2019 Dretske, Fred. Conclusive Reasons

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dretske-fred-conclusive-reasons 18/23

   D  o  w  n   l  o  a   d  e   d   B  y  :   [   U  n   i  v  e  r  s   i   t  y  o   f   T  o  r  o  n   t  o   ]   A   t  :   1   5  :   1   0   1   1   M  a  y   2   0   0   7

Conclusive Reasons

w r o n g a b o u t t h i s m a n ' s b e i n g h i s m a s t e r ) . B u t j u s t a s c l e a r l y t h e d o g d o e s n o t

k n oW t h a t h is m a s t e r i s i n t h e r o o m . W e r e q u i r e c o n c l u s i v e r e a s o n s e v e n

i n t h e c a se o f a n i m a l s . W o u l d t h e d o g h a v e s m e l l e d w h a t h e d i d , a n d h e a r d

w h a t h e d i d , i f h i s m a s t e r w a s n o t i n t h e r o o m ? I f h e wouM have, o r mighthave, t h e n h e d o e s n ' t k n o w . 16

F u r t h e r m o r e , c o n s i d e r a s c e p t i c w h o t a l k e d h i m s e l f i n t o b e l i e v i n g t h a t h is

g r o u n d s f o r b e l i e v i n g in a n e x t e r n a l w o r l d w e r e n o t s u f f ic i e n t l y g o o d t o t r u l y

s a y h e knew t h e r e w a s a n e x t e r n a l w o r l d a n d , h e n c e , n o l o n g e r b e l i e v e d ,

p o s i t i v e ly d i s b e l i e v e d , t h a t h e k n e w t h e r e w a s a n e x t e r n a l w o r l d . I t h i n k

t h a t a s l o n g a s h e c o n t i n u e d t o b e l i e v e ( w i t h o u t d o u b t , r e s e r v a t i o n o r q u e s -

t io n ) th a t t h e r e w a s a n e x t e r n a l w o r l d , a n d c o n t i n u e d t o b e l i e v e i t o n t h e

s a m e b a s i s a s w e d o , h e w o u l d k n o w t h e r e w a s a n e x t e r n a l w o r l d ( a s s u m i n g

h e r e t h a t we k n o w i t ) whatever h e h a p p e n e d t o b e l i e v e a b o u t w h a t h e k n e w . 17T h e r e m a r k s I h a v e j u s t m a d e a b o u t b e l i e v i n g t h a t o n e k n o w s a p p l y , a

fortiori, t o k n o w i n g t h a t o n e k n o w s . O n e q u a li f i e s f o r k n o w l e d g e w h e n o n e

h a s c o n c l u s i v e r e a s o n s f o r b e l i e v i n g ; o n e n e e d n o t , i n a d d i t i o n , k n o w t h a t

o n e h a s c o n c l u s i v e g r o u n d s . T o k n o w t h a t o n e h a s c o n c l u s i v e r e a s o n s ,

e m p i r i c a l ly c o n c l u s i v e r e a s o n s , m e a n s t h a t o n e k n o w s t h a t ( A ) is t r u e a n d

th is , i n t u r n , m e a n s t h a t o n e h a s l o g i c a l l y c o n c l u s i v e r e a s o n s ( se e c a s e I

a b o v e ) . K n o w i n g t h a t o n e k n o w s i s a f o r m o f i n n o c u l a t i o n a g a i n s t s c e p t i c a l

c h a l l e n g e s to t h e q u a l i t y o f o n e ' s e m p i r i c a l ly c o n c l u s i v e r e a s o n s ; o n e knows

16 R o b e r t S l e ig h h a s s u g g e st e d a n i n t e r e s ti n g m o d i f i c a t io n o f t h is c a s e - - o n e t h a t w o u l dappea r to cause d i f f icu l ty . Sup pose tha t the dog is t a k e n i n b y t h e t h i e f b u t , i n a d d i t i o n ,c i r c u m s t a n c e s a r e s u c h t h a t t h e t h i e f wouM not b e i n t h e r o o m unless t h e d o g ' s m a s t e rwas a l so the re . I t m ay be a b i t d i f f icu l t t o imag ine c i rcum s tances o f th i s so r t , bu t o the re x a m p l e s ( n o t i n v o l v i n g a n i m a l s a s t h e k n o w e r s ) c a n e a s il y b e m a n u f a c t u r e d ( C h i s h o l m ' se x a m p l e o f a m a n m i s t a k i n g a s h e e p d o g f o r a s h e e p i n a f ie l d w o r k s n i c e l y w h e n t h ef u r t h e r c o n d i t i o n i s a d d e d t h a t t h e d o g w o u l d n o t b e t h e r e u n l e ss th e r e w e r e s o m e s h e e pi n t h e f ie l d) . W i t h s u c h a m o d i f i c a t i o n it w o u l d s e e m t h a t t h e d o g h a s c o n c l u s i v er e a so n s f o r b e l i e v i n g h i s m a s t e r p r e s e n t s i n c e i t w o u l d n o t h a v e h e a r d a n d s m e l l e d w h a t

i t d i d u n l es s it s m a s t e r w a s p r e s en t . B u t d o e s t h e d o g k n o w t h a t i t s m a s t e r i s p r e s e n t ?I t h i n k i t n a t u r a l t o r e a d t h is s i t u a t io n i n s u c h a w a y t h a t t h e d o g b e l i e v es t h a t i t s m a s t e ri s i n t h e r o o m because i t m is t aken ly be l i eves tha t th i s m an ( the th ie f ) i s h i s ma s te r . I fr ead in th i s way , o f course , the re i s no d i f fi cu l ty s ince the d og ' s ba s i s fo r be l i ev ing tha th i s m a s t e r i s p r e s e n t is o b v i o u s l y d e f e c t i v e - - i t i s n o t t r u e , n o r d o e s t h e d o g k n o w ,t h a t t h is m a n i s h i s m a s t e r . I f , h o w e v e r , w e r e a d th i s c a s e i n su c h a w a y t h a t t h e d o gs i m p l y t a k e s t h e s o u n d s a n d s m e l l s a s a s i g n o f h i s m a s t e r ' s p r e s e n c e ( w i t h o u t m i s -i d e n t i f y i n g a n y o n e ) t h e n t h e d o g does h a v e c o n c l us i v e r e a so n s ( h e w o u l d n o t h a v es m e l l ed a n d h e a r d w h a t h e d i d u n l e ss h is m a s t e r w a s p r e s e n 0 b u t I s h o u l d w a n t t o s a ytha t in th i s ca se he knows t h a t h i s m a s t e r is p r e s e n t. I d o n o t t h i n k t h a t t h is i s a n e x -c e ss iv e ly s t r a i n e d i n t e r p r e ta t i o n . I t s e e m s t o m e q u i t e s im i l a r t o s i t u a t io n s i n w h i c h w ek n o w t h a t s o m e t h i n g i s s o o n t h e b a s i s o f s o m e i n d i c a t o r o r s i g n ( e . g . a n i n s t r u m e n tr e a d in g ) b u t a r e i g n o r a n t a s t o t h e m e c h a n i s m in virtue of which t h a t i n d i c a t o r o r s i g n is ar e l ia b l e ( c o n c lu s i v e) in d e x o f w h a t w e p u r p o r t t o k n o w .

17 E x a m p l e s s u c h a s t h is , a l o n g w i t h o t h e r m o r e s y s t em a t i c c o n s i d e r a t io n s , c o n v i n c e m et h a t n o t o n l y s h o u l d w e n o t r e q u i r e t h a t S b e li e v e h e h a s c o n c l u s i v e r e a s o n s i n o r d e r t ok n o w , b u t a l s o t h a t w e s h o u ld n o t r e q u i re t h a t h e n o t b e l i ev e h e d o e s n o t h a v e c o n -c l u si v e r e a s o n s . I f a p e r s o n ' s b e l i e v in g t h a t h e k n o w s is c o m p a t i b l e w i t h h i s n o t k n o w i n g ,w h y s h o u l d n ' t a p e r s o n ' s b e l i ev i n g t h a t h e d o e s n o t k n o w b e c o m p a t i b le w i t h h i sk n o w i n g ?

2 .

1 7

Page 19: Dretske, Fred. Conclusive Reasons

8/23/2019 Dretske, Fred. Conclusive Reasons

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dretske-fred-conclusive-reasons 19/23

   D  o  w  n   l  o  a   d  e   d   B  y  :   [   U  n   i  v  e  r  s   i   t  y  o   f   T  o  r  o  n   t  o   ]   A   t  :   1   5  :   1   0   1   1   M  a  y   2   0   0   7

Fred Dretske

t h a t R w o u l d n o t b e t h e c a s e u n l e s s P w e r e t h e c a se . L a c k i n g s u c h i n n o c u -

l a t i o n , h o w e v e r , o n e s ti l l k n o w s . O n e is s i m p l y le ss p r e p a r e d t o d e f e n d

( j u s t i f y ) t h e claim t o k n o w l e d g e ; b u t i n ab i li ty t o j u s ti fy t h e t r u t h o f w h a t o n e

c l ai m s , is s e ld o m , i f e v e r, a r e f u t a t i o n o f th e t r u t h o f w h a t o n e c l a i m s , a n dt hi s a p p l i e s t o k n o w l e d g e c l a im s a s w e l l a s a n y o t h e r .

T h e r e i s a c e r ta i n t y p e o f c o u n t e r - e x a m p l e w h i c h e x p l o it s t hi s c o n f u s i o n ,

a n d I w o u l d l ik e t o m e n t i o n i t a t th i s p o i n t t o f u r t h e r c l a r if y th e i n t e n t o f

c o n d i t i o n s ( A ) - (C ) . S u p p o s e S , f o r a p e rf e c t ly s il ly r e a s o n , o r b y sh e e r

a c c i d e n t , c o m e s t o t h e t r u e b e l i e f t h a t ( a s t a te s u c h a s ) R is a c o n c l u s i v e

r e a s o n f o r b el ie v i n g t h a t ( a st a te s u c h a s ) P i s o r w a s t h e ca s e . H a p p e n i n g

u p o n a s ta t e s u c h a s R i n th e a p p r o p r i a t e c i r c u m s t a n c e s , t h e n , h e b e li ev e s th a t

P is t h e c a s e o n t h e b a s is o f R . D o e s n ' t h e n o w h a v e conclusive reasons f o r

b e l i e v in g P ? B u t i s n ' t i t e q u a l l y o b v i o u s t h a t h e d o e s not k n o w t h a t P is t h e

c a s e ? Y e s a n d n o . Y e s , h e d o e s h a v e c o n c lu s i v e r e a s o n s ( a s I h a v e d e fi n e d

t hi s) . N o , i t is n o t o b v i o u s t h a t h e d o e s n o t k n o w t h a t P is t h e c a se . I

b e li ev e t h a t t h is o b j e c t i o n t r a d e s o n t h e v e r y c o n f u s i o n w e h a v e j u s t d i s c u ss e d ;

t h a t i s, i t m i s t a k e n l y s u p p o s e s t h a t i f S d o e s n o t k n o w t h a t R is c o n c l u s i v e

f o r P ( h a s n o l e g i t i m a t e b a s is f o r b e l i ev i n g th is ), t h e n S d o e s n o t k n o w t h a t

P is t h e c a s e ( h a s n o l e g i ti m a t e b a s i s f o r b e l ie v i n g t h is ). O r , w h a t I t h i n k

a m o u n t s t o t h e v e r y s a m e t h i n g , i t f a l l a c io u s l y c o n c l u d e s t h a t S ( g i v en h is

b a s is f o r b e li e f) m i g h t b e w r o n g a b o u t P f r o m t h e f a c t t h a t S ( g iv e n h is b a s is

f o r be l i e f) m i g h t b e w r o n g a b o u t R ' s b e in g c o n c lu s i v e f o r P . O r , t o p u t i t i n

s ti ll a n o t h e r w a y , i t i n c o r r e c t l y s u p p o s e s t h a t i f i t is , e i t h e r w h o l l y o r i n p a r t ,

a c c i d e n t a l t h a t S is r i g h t a b o u t R ' s b e i n g c o n c l u s i v e f o r P , t h e n i t is a ls o ,

e i t h e r w h o l l y o r i n p a r t , a c c i d e n t a l t h a t h e is r i g h t a b o u t P ' s b e i n g t h e c a s e .

S u c h i n f e r e n c e s a r e f a l l a c i o u s a n d , I b e li ev e , t h e y a r e f a ll a c i o u s in th e s a m e

w a y a s t h e f o l lo w i n g t w o e x a m p l e s : ( a) C o n c l u d i n g t h a t i t w a s s h e e r l u c k

( c h a n c e ), a m e r e a c c i d e n t, t h a t d e c l a r e r m a d e h is b i d o f se v e n s p a d e s b e c a u s e

i t w a s s h e e r l u c k ( c h a n c e ) , a m e r e a c c i d e n t , t h a t h e w a s d e a l t t h i r t e e n s p a d e s ;

( b) C o n c l u d i n g t h a t t h e w i n d o w w a s b r o k e n a c c i de n t a ll y b e c a u s e t h e m a n

w h o t h r e w t h e b r ic k t h r o u g h i t c a m e b y t h e b e li e f t h a t b r i c k s b r e a k w i n d o w s

i n a n a c c i d e n t a l (s il ly , u n r e a s o n a b l e , o r w h a t h a v e y o u ) w a y .S o m e t i m e s t h e s ta g e is se t f o r a n o n - a c c i d e n t i n a p u r e l y a c c i d e n t a l w a y .

I n t h e a b o v e c a s e i t is a c c i d e n t a l th a t S k n o w s t h a t P o n t h e b a s is o f R , b u t

t h is d o e s n o t m a k e i t a c c i d e n t a l t h a t h e is r i g h t a b o u t P - - f o r h e b e li ev e s P o n

t h e b a si s o f R a n d R s i m p l y w o u l d n o t b e t h e c a se u n le s s P w e r e t h e c a se .

G i v e n R , i t is n o t a t al l a c c i d e n t a l th a t h e is r i g h t a b o u t P . W h a t is a c c i d e n t a l

is t h a t h e w a s c o r r e c t in b e l i e v in g t h a t R w a s a c o n c l u s i v e r e a s o n f o r P , b u t a ll

t hi s s h o w s is th a t h e d o e s n o t k n o w t h a t R is c o n c l u s i v e f o r P , d o e s n o t k n o w

t h a t h e k n o w s t h a t P . A n d w i t h th i s m u c h I a m i n fu l l a g r e e m e n t . 18

xs In speaking of 'accidentality" in this connection I have in mind Peter Unger's analysiso f knowledge in terms o f its not being a t al l accidental that the perso n is r ight (see his'A n Analys is of Factual K now ledge ' Journal of Philosophy, M arch 21, 1968). Th at is , Iwa nt to claim that an y S satisfying co ndi t ions (A)-(C) is a perso n o f who m i t is t rue tosay that i t i s not at al l accidental that he is r ight about P 's being the case, al though i tm ay he accidental that this is no accident (i t m ay be accidental tha t he has conclusivereasons, that he has reasons in virtue of which it is not at all accidental that he is fightabou t P).

1 8

Page 20: Dretske, Fred. Conclusive Reasons

8/23/2019 Dretske, Fred. Conclusive Reasons

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dretske-fred-conclusive-reasons 20/23

   D  o  w  n   l  o  a   d  e   d   B  y  :   [   U  n   i  v  e  r  s   i   t  y  o   f   T  o  r  o  n   t  o   ]   A   t  :   1   5  :   1   0   1   1   M  a  y   2   0   0   7

C o n c l u s i v e R e a s o n s

S c e p t i c a l a r g u m e n t s h a v e t r a d i t i o n a l l y r e l i e d o n t h e f a c t t h a t S , i n p u r -

p o r t in g t o k n o w t h a t P o n t h e b a s is o f R , w a s c o n s p i c u o u s l y u n a b l e t oj u s t if y t h e q u a l i t y o f h i s r e a s o n s , w a s h o p e l e s s l y i n c a p a b l e o f p r o v i d i n g

s a ti s fa c to r y d o c u m e n t a t i o n f o r th e t r u t h o f ( A ) . T h e c o n c l u s i o n f a ll a c io u s l yd r a w n f r o m t h i s w a s t h a t S d i d n o t k n o w t h a t P w a s t r u e ( s i m p l y ) o n t h eb a si s o f R . C l e a r l y , h o w e v e r , a l l t h a t f o l l o w s f r o m t h e f a c t t h a t S h a s l it tl e

o r n o g r o u n d s f o r t h i n k i n g ( A ) t r u e is t h a t h e l a c k s s a t is f a c to r y g r o u n d s f o r

t h in k i n g h e k n o w s t h a t P is t r u e . I t d o e s n o t f o l lo w t h a t h e d o e s n o t k n o w

t h a t P is t r u e . K n o w i n g t h a t P is t h e c as e o n t h e b a s i s o f R i n v o l v e s k n o w i n g

t h a t R i s t h e c a s e ( a n d b e l i e v in g P o n t h a t b a s is ) w h e n ( A ) i s t r u e . I t i s the

t r u t h o f ( A ) , n o t t h e f a c t t h a t o n e k n o w s i t t r u e, w h i c h m a k e s R c o n c l u si v e

f o r P .

T h e r e i s a n o t h e r r e s p e ct in w h i c h t r a d i t i o n a l s c e p ti ca l a rg u m e n t s h a v e b e e no n th e m a r k . O n e w a y o f e x p r e ss i n g m y a r g u m e n t i s t o s a y t h a t t h e f a m i l ia ra n d ( to s o m e ) e x t r e m e l y a n n o y i n g c h a l le n g e , ' C o u l d n ' t i t b e a n i ll u s io n

( fa k e , i m i t a t i o n , e t c .) ? ' o r ' I s n ' t i t p o s s ib l e t h a t y o u a r e d r e a m i n g ( h a l l u c i n a t -i n g , e t c . ) ? ' i s , i n a c e r t a i n i m p o r t a n t r e s p e c t , q u i t e p r o p e r a n d a p p r o p r i a t e

e v e n w h e n t h e r e i s n o s p e c i a l r e a s o n t o t h i n k y o u a r e d r e a m i n g , h a l lu c i n a t in g ,

c o n f r o n ti n g a f a k e , e t c . F o r o u r k n o w l e d g e c l a i m s d o e n t a i l t h a t t h e e v i -d e n c e o r g r o u n d s o n e h a s f o r b e l i e v i n g w o u l d n o t h a v e b e e n a v a i l a b l e i f

w h a t o n e c o n s e q u e n t l y b e li ev e s ( a n d c l ai m s t o k n o w ) w e r e fa l s e; h e n c e ,

t h e y d o e n t a i l t h a t , g i ve n o n e ' s e v i d e n c e o r g r o u n d s , i t i s f a l s e t h a t o n em i g h t b e m i s t a k e n a b o u t w h a t o n e p u r p o r t s t o k n o w . ( 1) d o e s e n t a il t h e

f a ls it y o f ( 3 ) ; h e n c e , ( 1) c a n b e s h o w n t o b e f a l s e n o t o n l y b y s h o w i n g t h a t

S is d r e a m i n g o r h a l l u c i n a t i n g o r w h a t e v e r , b u t a l s o b y s h o w i n g t h a t h e

m i g h t b e , t h a t h i s e x p e r i en c e o r i n f o r m a t i o n o n w h i c h h e b a s es h i s b e l i e f

t h a t P c a n b e h a d i n s u c h c i r c u m s t a n c e s a s t h e s e w i t h o u t P b e i n g t h e c a s e .

I t is n o t i n t h e p r o p r i e t y o r r e l e v a n c e o f t h e s e c h a ll e n g e s t h a t s c e p t ic i s m h a s

g o n e a w r y . O n t h e c o n t r a r y , t h e p e rs i s te n t a n d c o n t i n u i n g a p p e a l o f s c ep t i-

c i s m l i e s i n a f a i l u r e t o c o me to g r ip s w i th t h i s c h a l l e n g e , i n a r e fu s a l t o

a c k n o w l e d g e i t s l e g i t i m a c y a n d , h e n c e , a n s w e r i t . I t s i m p l y w i l l n o t d o t oi n si st t h a t i n c o n c e r n i n g h i m s e l f w i t h t h e p o s s i b i l i ty o f m i s t a k e a s c e p t i c iss e tt in g ar t if i c ia l l y h i g h s t a n d a r d s f o r k n o w l e d g e a n d , t h e r e f o r e , m a y b e

i g n o r e d w h e n c o n s i d e r i n g o r d i n a r y k n o w l e d g e c la im s . ( 1 ) d o e s im p l y t h a t( 3) is f a ls e , a n d i t s e em s t o m e q u i t e a l e g i ti m a t e l i n e o f a r g u m e n t f o r t h e

s c e pt ic t o i n s is t t h a t i f ( 3) i s t r u e , i f y o u m i g h t b e d r e a m i n g o r w h a t e v e r ,

t h e n (1 ) is f a l s e - - y o u d o n o t k n o w , o n t h e b a s i s o f y o u r p r e s e n t v is u a l,

a u d i t o r y , et c . e x p e ri e n ce s , w h a t y o u p u r p o r t t o k n o w .

I t h i n k t h e r e a r e s e v e r al c o n f u s i o n s t o b e f o u n d i n t r a d i t i o n a l s c e p t i c is m ,

b u t o n e o f t h e m is n o t t h a t o f i n si s ti n g t h a t t o k n o w t h a t P o n t h e b a s is o f R ,R m u s t s o m e h o w p r e c l u d e t h e p o s s i b i li t y o f n o t - P . T h e c o n f u s i o n s li e e ls e -

w h e r e. I f o n e i n t e rp r e t s t h e ' m i g h t ' ( o r 'c o u l d ' ) o f ( 3) t o o n a r r o w l y (a s

s i m p l y ' l o g i c a l ly p o s s ib l e ' ) t h e n , o f c o u r s e , ( 3 ) w i ll , in a l m o s t a l l i n t e r e s ti n g

c a se s , t u r n o u t t r u e a n d ( t h e r e f o r e ) ( 1 ) f a ls e . E v e n i f o n e l i b e ra l iz e s t h e

i n t e r p r e t a t i o n o f ( 3 ), a n d t h i n k s o f i t as r e p r e s e n t in g s o m e f o r m o f p h y si c a l

i m p o s s i b i l it y a s I h a v e , t h e r e i s s ti ll t h e t e n d e n c y t o t h i n k o f th i s p h y s i c a l

1 9

Page 21: Dretske, Fred. Conclusive Reasons

8/23/2019 Dretske, Fred. Conclusive Reasons

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dretske-fred-conclusive-reasons 21/23

   D  o  w  n   l  o  a   d  e   d   B  y  :   [   U  n   i  v  e  r  s   i   t  y  o   f   T  o  r  o  n   t  o   ]   A   t  :   1   5  :   1   0   1   1   M  a  y   2   0   0   7

F r e d D r e t s k e

i m p o s s i b i l i ty in i t s m o s t g e n e r a l s e n s e , a s t h e i m p o s s i b i l it y o f v i o l a t i n g s o m e

n a t u r a l l a w w h i c h h o l d s i n a l l c i r c u m s t a n c e s a n d n o t , a s I h a v e a r g u e d , t h e

i m p o s s i b il it y o f h a v i n g R w i t h n o t - P i n t h e p a r t ic u l a r c i r c u m s t a n c e s w h i c h i n

f a c t p r e v a i l o n t h e o c c a s i o n i n q u e s t i o n . T h e m o s t s u b tl e c o n f u s i o n , h o w -e v er , is t h e o n e m e n t i o n e d i n t he p r e c e d i n g p a r a g r a p h s - - t h e f a ll a cy o f

s u p p o s i n g t h a t i n k n o w i n g t h a t P w e m u s t s o m e h o w b e a b le t o j u st if y th e

f a c t t h a t w e k n o w t h a t P . D o u b t l e s s w e s h o u ld h a v e s o m e j u s ti f ic a t io n f o r

( 1 ) i f w e a s s e r t i t, b u t o u r l a c k o f s u c h a j u s t i f ic a t i o n r e fl e ct s, n o t o n t h e t r u t h

o f w h a t w e h a v e s a i d , b u t o n t h e p r o p r i e t y o f o u r s a y in g i t. W h a t w o u l d sh o w

t h a t w e d i d n o t k n o w t h a t P o n t h e b a s i s o f R is t h e t r u t h o f (3 ), n o t o u r

i n c a p a c i t y t o s h o w i t f a l s e ( b y s h o w i n g ( 2) t r u e f o r i n s ta n c e ) . F o r i f ( 2 ) i s

t r u e , t h e n , i n a n s w e r t o t h e s c e p t ic ' s q u e s t io n , ' C o u l d n ' t y o u b e h a l l u c in a t i n g ? '

o r ' M i g h t i t n o t b e a f a k e o r i m i t a t i o n o f so m e s o r t ? ' t h e c o r r e c t re s p o n se ,

w h e t h e r o r n o t w e k n o w i t c o r r e c t , w h e t h e r o r n o t w e c a n s h o w i t c o r r e c t

i s ' N o ! '

S ti ll, e v e n i f o n e s h o u l d a c c e p t t h e a r g u m e n t s u p t o t h i s p o i n t , t h e r e a r e

g e n u i n e d i f f ic u l ti e s w i t h t a k i n g a s a s u f fi c ie n t c o n d i t i o n f o r k n o w l e d g e , t h e

p o s s e s s i o n o f c o n c l u s i v e r e a s o n s t o b e li e v e . I s h a ll n o t t r y to a b s o r b t h e s e

d i ff ic u lt ie s i n th i s p a p e r ; I h a v e t r i e d t o d o s o w i t h r e s p e c t t o a m o r e r e s t r i c t e d

s e t o f c a se s ( v is u a l p e r c e p t i o n ) i n a n o t h e r p l a c e . 19 W h e t h e r t h e s e c o m p l i c a -

t i o n s c a n b e h a n d l e d i n t h e m u c h m o r e g e n e r a l ty p e o f s i t u a ti o n I h a v e b e e n

d i s c u s s in g I l e a v e o p e n - - - o n l y s u g g e s t i n g t h e l in e s a l o n g w h i c h I t h i n k t h e y

c a n b e sa t is f a c to r i ly h a n d l e d . T h e t w o e x a m p l e s I p r e s e n t d o n o t a f f e c t

m y a r g u m e n t t h a t t h e p o s s e s s i o n o f c o n cl u s iv e r e a s o n s is a n e c e s s a r y c o n -

d i t io n f o r k n o w l e d g e .

S , u p o n i n s p e c t i n g a n i m m e r s e d c h e m i c a l i n d i c a t o r , d e c l a r e s t h a t t h e

s o l u t i o n i n w h i c h i t i s i m m e r s e d is a b a s e . H e b e l ie v e s ( c o r r e c t l y ) t h a t t h e

i n d i c a t o r is t h e s o r t w h i c h t u r n s f r o m y e l lo w to b l u e o n l y w h e n i m m e r s e d

in a ba s e. T h e i n d i c a to r is T h y m o l B lu e a n d w o u l d n o t h a v e t u r n e d f r o m

y e l l o w t o b l u e ( i n t h e s e c o n d i t i o n s ) u n l e s s th e s o l u t i o n w e r e a b a s e . T h e

f o l l o w i n g t h r e e c o n d i t i o n s a r e s a t i s f i e d :

( A ' ) T h e i n d i c a t o r ' s c h a n g e i n c o l o u r ( y e l lo w t o b l u e) is a c o n c lu s i v e

r e a s o n f o r b e l i e v in g t h a t t h e s o l u t i o n i s a b a s e .

( B ' ) S b el ie v e s t h a t t h e s o l u t i o n i s a b a s e a n d h e b e l ie v e s t h is o n t h e

b a s i s o f th e i n d i c a t o r ' s c h a n g e i n c o l o u r .

( C ' ) S k n o w s t h a t t h e in d i c a t o r c h a n g e d f r o m y e l l o w t o b l u e ( h e s a wi t c h a n g e - - s a w t h a t i t c h a n g e d ) .

I h a v e s a i d t h a t t h e s e t h r e e c o n d i ti o n s w e r e s u ff ic ie n t f o r k n o w l e d g e . D o e s

S k n o w t h a t th e s o l u t io n is a b a s e ? B e f o r e a n s w e r i n g t h is q u e s t io n t h e

r e a d e r s h o u l d b e i n f o r m e d t h a t t h e r e is a n o t h e r c h e m i c a l in d i c at o r, B r o m o -p h e n a l B l u e , w h i c h a l s o t u r n s f r o m y e l l o w t o b l u e b u t o n l y w h e n i m m e r s e d

i n a n a c i d . S , h o w e v e r , i s q u i te u n a w a r e o f t h e e x is te n c e o f o t h e r s u c h

i n d i c at o r s . H e m e r e l y a s s u m e s t h a t a y e ll o w i n d i c a t o r t u r n i n g b l u e is a

p o s i t iv e t e s t f o r a b a se . S ' s i g n o r a n c e o n t h i s p o i n t d o e s n o t a l t e r t h e f a c t

la Seeing a nd K nowing (Chicago; 1969), Ch apter II I.

2 0

Page 22: Dretske, Fred. Conclusive Reasons

8/23/2019 Dretske, Fred. Conclusive Reasons

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dretske-fred-conclusive-reasons 22/23

   D  o  w  n   l  o  a   d  e   d   B  y  :   [   U  n   i  v  e  r  s   i   t  y  o   f   T  o  r  o  n   t  o   ]   A   t  :   1   5  :   1   0   1   1   M  a  y   2   0   0   7

Conclusive Reasons

t h a t t h e a b o v e t h r e e c o n d i t i o n s a r e sa ti sf ie d . Y e t , d e s p i t e t h e s a t i s f a c t i o n

o f t h es e c o n d i t i o n s , I fi n d i t ( in s o m e c a s es ) m o s t i m p l a u s i b l e t o s a y h e k n o w s

t h a t t h e s o lu t i o n is a b a s e. W h e t h e r h e k n o w s o r n o t d e p e n d s i n a c ru c i a l

w a y o n o u r u n d e r s t a n d i n g o f c o n d i t i o n ( B ') a b o v e . T h e in d i c a t o r ' s c h a n g ei n c o l o u r , a l t h o u g h i t is a c o n c l u s i v e r e a s o n , h a s i ts c o n c l u s i v e n e s s , s o t o

s p e ak , r e s tr i c te d i n s c o p e t o t h e r a n g e o f c as e s i n w h i c h T h y m o l B l u e is th e

i n d i c a t o r ( o r, i f t h is l a b o r a t o r y o n l y u s e s T h y m o l B l u e , i n w h i c h t h e i n -

d i c a t o r is fro m t h is l a b o r a t o r y o r o f t h e s o r t u s e d i n t h is l a b o r a t o r y ) . W h a t

is a c o n c l u s i v e r e a s o n f o r b e l ie v i n g t h e s o l u t i o n t o b e a b a s e is t h a t a Thymol

Blue i n d i c a to r ( o r a n i n d i c a t o r f r o m t h i s l a b o r a t o r y ) c h a n g e d f r o m y e l lo w to

b l ue w h e n i m m e r s e d i n i t , not s i m p l y t h a t an ( u n s p e c i f i e d ) c h e m i c a l i n d i c a t o r

c h a n g e d f r o m y e l l o w t o b lu e . T h e f a c t t h a t this i n d i c a t o r happens to be

T h y m o l B lu e is w h a t a c c o u n t s f o r th e t r u th o f ( A ' ) a b o v e . S in ce , h o w e v e r ,

i t is a T h y m o l B l u e in d i c a t o r ' s ( o r s o m e o t h e r a p p r o p r i a t e l y s p ec if ie d in -

d i c a t o r 's ) c o l o u r t r a n s f o r m a t i o n w h i c h is c o n c l u s iv e , w e m u s t ( s ee c o n d i t i o n

( B ' )) r e q u i r e t h a t S ' s b a s i s f o r b e l ie v i n g t h e s o l u t i o n a b a s e b e t h a t a Thymol

Blue indicator ( o r such-and-such indicator) c h a n g e d f r o m y e l lo w t o b lu e . H e

n e e d n o t , o n c e a g a i n , k n o w t h a t a T h y m o l B l u e 's c o l o u r t r a n s f o r m a t i o n ( o r

s u c h - a n d - s u c h i n d i c a t o r ' s t r a n s f o r m a t i o n ) is conclusive, b u t h e m u s t b e

e x p l o i t i n g t h o s e t h i n g s a b o u t t h e i n d i c a t o r ' s t r a n s f o r m a t i o n in virtue of

which it is conclusive. I n s o m e c a s e s a n A ' s b e i n g B is a c o n c l u s i v e r e a s o n f o r

b e l ie v i n g P o n l y i n v i r t u e o f t h e f a c t t h a t i t is , i n p a r t i c u l a r , a n A ( o r , s a y ,

s o m e t h i n g w h i c h i s Q ) w h i c h i s B ; i n s u c h c a s e s w e m u s t u n d e r s t a n d c o n -

d i t io n ( B ) a s r e q u i r i n g t h a t S ' s b a s is f o r b e l ie v i n g P i n c lu d e , n o t o n l y t h e

f a c t t h a t t h is ( s o m e t h i n g o r o t h e r ) i s B , b u t a l so t h a t t h is s o m e t h i n g o r o t h e r

is , i n p a r t i c u l a r , an A ( o r s o m e t h i n g w h i c h is Q ) . A n d t h is r e q u ir e s o f u s i n

a d d i t i o n t h a t w e u n d e r s t a n d c o n d i t i o n ( C ) a b o v e i n s u ch a w a y t h a t S n o t

o n l y k n o w t h a t R is t h e c as e , k n o w ( le t u s s a y ) t h a t A is B , b u t a l s o k n o w t h a t

i t i s , i n p a r t i c u l a r , an A w h i c h i s B . ~°

O n e f u r t h e r e x a m p l e t o i l l u s tr a t e a d i s t i n c t, b u t c l o s e l y r e l a t e d , d i f f ic u l ty .

S u p p o s e K is b e h a v i n g i n su c h a w a y t h a t i t is t r u e t o s a y th a t h e w o u l d n o t

b e b e h a v i n g in t h a t w a y u n le s s he w a s n e r v o u s . S u p p o s e S p u r p o r t s t o k n o w

t h a t K is n e r v o u s a n d w h e n a s k e d h o w h e k n o w s t hi s, r e p li es b y s a y in g ,

s0 This typ e of restriction is required fo r the sort o f example discussed in m y article 'Re as on sand Consequences' , Analysis, Apri l, 1968. In this art icle I argue d that on e could knowtha t the A is B (e.g. the widow was limping) while having li t t le, if any, justificationfo r believing tha t i t was, in particular, a widow w ho was limping (hence, on e could kn owthat the widow was l imping without knowing t ha t it was a widow who was l imping).Since, however, the statement 'T he w idow is l imping' implies 'Th er e is (or i t is) a widoww ho is l imping' , I to ok this as show ing that S cart kno w tha t P, kn ow th at P entails Q ,and ye t no t know th at Q. O n the present analysis o f conclusive reasons, of course, Pis a conclusive reaso n fo r Q (since P entails Q ) and any one wh o bel ieved Q o n the basis o fP shou ld (on this analysis) kn ow th at Q. Th e restriction being discussed in the textblocks this result by requiring S to know those things in particular about P which makesi t conclusive for Q. In this example S m ust kn ow that it is a widoww ho is l imping sinceit is this aspect o f his conclusive reas on (the wid ow is l imping) in virtue o f wh ich itfunct ions as a conclusive reason for bel ieving that there is a w idow who is l imping. Iam indebted to B ruce Freed fo r clari ficat ion on this po int .

2 1

Page 23: Dretske, Fred. Conclusive Reasons

8/23/2019 Dretske, Fred. Conclusive Reasons

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dretske-fred-conclusive-reasons 23/23

   D  o  w  n   l  o  a   d  e   d   B  y  :   [   U  n   i  v  e  r  s   i   t  y  o   f   T  o  r  o  n   t  o   ]   A   t  :   1   5  :   1   0   1   1   M  a  y   2   0   0   7

F r e d D r e t s k e

' F r o m t h e w a y h e is b e h a v i n g . ' O n c e a ga i n, o u r t h r e e c o n d i t i o n s a r e sa ti s-

f ie d , o r c a n e a s i l y b e a s s u m e d t o b e s at is fi ed . Y e t , i f w e s u p p o s e t h a t t h e

d i st in c t iv e t h in g a b o u t K ' s b e h a v i o u r i s t h a t h e is d o i n g B 1 whi le p e r f o r m i n g

B 2, t h e n i f S is r e ly i n g o n B t ( o r B 2) a l o n e , w e s h o u l d n o t s a y t h a t h e k n o w st h a t K i s n e r v o u s . I t is q u i t e t r u e t h a t t h e b a si s f o r S ' s b e l i e f ( t h a t K is

n e r v o u s ) is K ' s b e h a v i o u r , a n d i n t h i s ( r e l a ti v e l y u n s p e c i f ie d ) se n s e w e m i g h t

s a y t h a t S is r e ly i n g o n t h e s i g n i f ic a n t a s p e c t s o f t h e s i t u a t i o n , b u t t h e f a c t

i s t h a t t h e c r u c i a l a s p e c t s (t h o s e a s p e c ts w h i c h m a k e K ' s b e h a v i o u r c o n c lu s i v e )

a r e m o r e s p ec if ic t h a n t h o s e o n w h i c h S is r el y in g in p u r p o r t i n g t o k n o w .

W e m u s t i n si s t, t h e r e f o r e , t h a t S ' s b as i s f o r b e l ie v i n g P b e as speci f ic in

r e g a r d t o t h e r e l e v a n t as p e c t s o f R a s i s n e c e s s a r y t o c a p t u r e t h e d i s t in c t iv e

( i . e . c o n c lu s iv e , t h o se f i g u r in g e s se n t i a l l y i n t h e s a t i s f a c t io n o f ( 2 ) ) f e a tu r e s

o f t h e s i t u a t i o n .I t h i n k b o t h o f th e a b o v e q u a l if i ca t io n s c a n b e s u m m a r i z e d b y s a y in g t h a t

w h e n o n e h a s c o n c l u s i v e r e a s o n s , t h e n t h i s is s uf f ic i en t f o r k n o w i n g t h a t P i s

t h e c a s e w h e n t h o s e r e a s o n s are pro per ly spec if ic , b o t h w i th r e g a r d t o wh a t i t i st h a t d i s p la y s t h e p a r t i c u l a r f e a t u r e s o n w h i c h o n e r el ie s a n d o n t h e p a r t ic u l a r

f e a t u r e s t h e m s e l v e s . A c o m p l e t e s t a t e m e n t o f t h e s e r e s t r i c ti o n s is , h o w e v e r ,

f a r b e y o n d th e s c o p e o f th i s p a p e r . S u ff ic e i t t o s a y t h a t t h e p o s s e s s i o n o f

c o n c l u s i v e r e a s o n s f o r b e li e v in g is a n e c e s s a r y c o n d i t i o n f o r k n o w l e d g e a n d ,

p ro p e r ly q u a l i f i e d a lo n g th e l i n e s su g g e s t e d h e re , a l so ( I t h in k ) su f f i c i e n t .

R e c e i v e d O c t o b e r 1 97 0

Un iv e r s i t y o f W i sc o n s in


Top Related