Transcript
Page 1: É. Debreuve, G.T. Gullberg Medical Imaging Research Laboratory

Dense electrical map reconstruction from ECG/MCG measurements with known fiber structure and standard

activation sequence

É. Debreuve, G.T. GullbergMedical Imaging Research LaboratoryThe University of Utah, Salt Lake City

Page 2: É. Debreuve, G.T. Gullberg Medical Imaging Research Laboratory

Electrical activity of the myocardium

Myocardium contraction:

Electrical activity of the myocardium Signal propagation (integral equations)

Electrical potential on the thorax

Magnetic field close to the thorax

Page 3: É. Debreuve, G.T. Gullberg Medical Imaging Research Laboratory

MCG

ECG

Electrodes

SQUIDs

Signal acquisition

Non-invasive measurements:

ECG (electrical potential) Standard clinical exam: 12 electrodes

MCG (magnetic field) E.g., 30 measurement sites

Page 4: É. Debreuve, G.T. Gullberg Medical Imaging Research Laboratory

Analysis of the measurements

Diagnosis of heart diseases:

Analysis of the ECG curves Coarse defect localizations

Analysis of the MCG curves ?

Reconstruction of the electrical activity Electrical model of the myocardium Geometrical model of the thorax Discretization of the propagation equations Resolution of a system of equations

Analysis of the reconstructed electrical activity

or

Page 5: É. Debreuve, G.T. Gullberg Medical Imaging Research Laboratory

Forward model: General

Electrical model of the myocardium:

Equivalent current dipoles Location, direction, magnitude (variable over time)

Tissue conductivities

Geometrical model of the thorax:

Piecewise constant isotropic conductivity volume Triangulation of the boundaries

Page 6: É. Debreuve, G.T. Gullberg Medical Imaging Research Laboratory

Forward model: Based on NCAT

NCAT phantom:

With myocardium+cavities, liver, lungs Isotropic conductivities:

Blood, myocardium, liver, lungs, soft tissues

Discretization:

2900 triangles 1500 nodes

BEM of the NCAT phantom,The University of North Carolina,Chapel Hill

Page 7: É. Debreuve, G.T. Gullberg Medical Imaging Research Laboratory

Electrical activity reconstruction

Ill-posed inverse problem:

Too many unknowns Location, direction, magnitude of each dipole

Too few measurements Too much noise

Reconstruction of many dipoles

Need for regularization

Page 8: É. Debreuve, G.T. Gullberg Medical Imaging Research Laboratory

Fiber structure Dipole directions

Regularization of the problem

Use of known (or a priori) information:

Voxelization of the myocardium Known locations

Cardiac fibers Known directions

Activation sequence +Action potential shape

Standard magnitudesat anytime during the cycle

Unknowns with a priori: Dipole magnitudes

BioengineeringResearch Group,Auckland

Activation sequence Action potential

Page 9: É. Debreuve, G.T. Gullberg Medical Imaging Research Laboratory

Regularized reconstruction

Implementation:

System of equations: RX = M– R: Transformation matrix from dipole magnitudes to measurements– X: Unknown dipole magnitudes– M: Electrical potential and magnetic field measurements

Solution close to standard magnitudes: ( X - X ) = 0 ( ): Function allowing half-quadratic regularization (commonly

used for support or edge-preserving smoothing constraints)– X: Standard magnitudes

Criterion to be minimized: |RX - M|2 + ( X - X )

Polak-Ribiere conjugate gradient algorithm

Page 10: É. Debreuve, G.T. Gullberg Medical Imaging Research Laboratory

Preliminary results: Data simulated w/o noise

Dipoles: 700+ Locations: Spaced every 3 mm in x, y, and z inside the myocardium Directions & magnitudes: variations around a given dipole

configuration Magnitude interval:

[0.75, 1.25]

Measurement sites: Electrical potential: 250 (each node of the outer surface) Magnetic field: 250 (close to each potential measurement sites)

Front Back

Page 11: É. Debreuve, G.T. Gullberg Medical Imaging Research Laboratory

Without regularization:

With regularization:

Preliminary results: Reconstruction

No r

eg

ula

rizati

on

Wit

h r

eg

ula

riza

tion

Relative error Relative errorhistogram

Relative errorhistogram

Relative error

Page 12: É. Debreuve, G.T. Gullberg Medical Imaging Research Laboratory

Future works

Using this forward model: Measurements with noise

Improved forward model: Bi-domain representation Coupled boundary-element/finite-element model

Real data


Top Related