Download - Econ & heg in debate
ECON & HEG IN DEBATE
Part OneEconomics
What is Economics? The study of how we use limited
resources to meet unlimited wants This means that SCARCITY is at the heart
of our understanding of modern economics
“Invisible Hand” Ascribed to Adam Smith (who was not
necessarily a capitalist) Claims that markets direct individual self-
interest towards socially desirable outcomes
Has become the foundation of free market capitalism
“Capitalism” Economic system based on the private
ownership of the means of production Is driven by the production of goods and
services for a profit Types of capitalism
Mercantilism Free-market economy Social market economy State-ownership Mixed economy
“Socialism” Economic system based on collective
ownership of the means of production Is driven by the production of goods and
services to meet social needs Covers a variety of sociopolitical systems
Anarchism (libertarian socialism) Authoritarian communism Democratic socialism Syndicalism
“Supply & Demand” Describes how many markets determine
prices If supply increases relative to demand,
prices DECLINE… If supply decreases relative to demand,
prices INCREASE If demand increases relative to supply,
prices INCREASE If demand decreases relative to supply,
prices DECREASE
“Elasticity” Describes the degree to which one
economic variable affects others ELASTIC variables exhibit large responses
to relatively small changes in another variable
INELASTIC variables exhibit small responses to relatively large changes in another variable
“GDP”—Gross Domestic Product
Value of expenditures on final goods and services
U.S. GDP has increased steadily—when you hear about “economic growth”, they are usually referencing GDP
‘Recession’ means 6 months (2 quarters) of negative growth
GDP as a measure of economic performance can be misleading—non-monetarized labor, shift of non-monetarized labor into the market
“Keynesianism” School of economic thought arising from the
ideas of John Maynard Keynes Claims that markets often produce
inefficient outcomes that can/should be corrected by government intervention
Interventionary instruments include Fiscal policy Monetary policy
Debate about effectiveness usually centers on interpreting the effectiveness of FDRs response to the Great Depression
“Supply Side Economics” Theory that economic growth should be
stimulated by lowering barriers to production
Generally means lowering tax rates on income (individual and corporate) and capital gains
Strongly associated with “Ronald Reagan” and “trickle down economics”
“The Markets” Commodities: exchange, in bulk, of
everything from orange juice to petroleum—include both ‘spot’ and ‘futures’ contracts
Currency: exchange of different national currencies
Debt: issuance and trading of bonds (promises to pay in the future)
Equity: issuance and trading of stocks (shares in a company)
“Competitiveness” Describes the ability of a particular group
(company, sector, nation) to sell goods in a given market RELATIVE to other groups in the same market
Competitiveness expresses profitability, which is directly tied to income, wealth, etc.
EXP: Saudi vs. tar sand oil production
“Productivity” Describes the efficiency of production Productivity increases when greater
output becomes possible with the same input
Often couched in terms of “worker productivity”, but is also a measure of technological efficiency
Growth rates of 1-2% are good
“Exchange Rates” Rate at which one currency is exchanged for
another and/or the value of one nation’s currency in terms of another currency
Appreciation: increase in value of a currency relative to others—benefits consumers and hurts producers, ceteris paribus
Depreciation: decrease in value of a currency relative to others—benefits producers and hurts consumers, ceteris paribus
Currencies typically are pegged, floating, or mixed
“Employment Rate” Is usually expressed in terms of
‘unemployment’ The official unemployment rate is 7.6%--
percentage of the workforce that is seeking employment but is unable to find a position
Including the number of people who are no longer actively seeking employment takes the rate up to 15%+
‘Normal’ unemployment levels are between 4 and 6 percent
“Inflation” & “Deflation” Inflation: rise of general level of prices of
goods and services over time Deflation: decline of general level of
prices of goods and services over time PREDICTABILITY is key, although
economies tend to do best with relatively low, steady inflation (1-4%)
Deflation, over any extended period, and hyper-inflation can quickly wreck economies
“Interest Rates” Rate at which interest is paid by a borrower to a
lender for the use of money Are important because they directly affect
consumer spending, the housing market, etc, and thus impact all financial markets
Key interest rates are: Federal funds rate (rate for overnight, uncollateralized
loans between banks) Prime rate—general FFR+3%
Are generally linked to inflation on an inverse basis
Stagflation!
“Confidence” Consumer confidence: expression of
consumer sentiment about the current and future status of the economy
Often used as a predictor of future consumer behavior
Particularly important because consumer spending makes up over two-thirds of the economy
Business confidence: expression of business sentiment about the current and future status of the economy
Often used as a predictor of future business behavior (hiring, tech investment)
“Income (in)Equality” Expression of the relative distribution of
income (and wealth) across the population
Is highly variable, both across time and between countries
Income inequality is growing rapidly in the U.S.
National Debt Governments usually borrow through the
use of bonds U.S. national debt has two parts
Public debt—securities held by non-federal investors ($12T)
Inter-Government debt—IOUs held by federal accounts on other federal entities ($5T)
Influences interest rates, and more broadly, market sentiment
Oil Prices
Influence the economy—a little bit
Dedev Premise 1: economic collapse is
inevitable Premise 2: collapse sooner is better than
collapse later
Part 2Leadership
Major US Foreign Policy Schools Realist Maximalists
Neoconservatives George H.W.
Realist Minimalists Isolationists Offshore balancers (Layne)
Liberal Maximalists Wilsonians (spread democracy around the world) Clintonians (power used in the spread of ideals)
Liberal/Constructive Minimalists Fukuyama (let markets do their work) Diamond (let freedom do its work politically)
Measuring Hegemony How does one define hegemony? Easiest
definition is holding a preponderance of power relative to other states—power as a goal of states, a measure of influence, an outcome of victory, control over resources and capabilities
Hegemony can be measured along several axes Military power (power projection)—ability to enforce
your will through military might Economic power—ability to pay for militaries, bribe
allies, exert pressure on other states Cultural power—attractiveness of yoru way of life Ideological power—attractiveness of your ideas
Polarities The international system is often
describes as having “poles,” conglomerations of power around one or more states Apolar (no dominant power) Unipolar (one dominant power) Bipolar (two competing powers) Multipolar (multiple competing powers)
Hegemony can also be described in terms of global and regional influence
Status of the Current System
Major powers (global influence) Middle powers (global prominence,
regional influence) Other states of influence
Major Powers China European Union France Germany Great Britain Japan Russia United States
Middle Powers Australia Brazil Canada Egypt India Indonesia Iran Israel Italy Pakistan South Africa South Korea Turkey
Other States of Influence Oil Producers (Iraq, Kuwait, Saudi,
Venezuela) High Population States (Bangladesh,
Mexico) Emerging Regional Powers (Ethiopia,
Nigeria, Vietnam, Thailand) Major Aid Providers (Nordic states,
Netherlands)
Is the U.S. a Hegemon? Military Power
Outspends the world Unmatched power projection capabilities
(aircraft, carriers, missiles) Unmatched surveillance capabilities Unmatched technological edge (smart
weapons, space weapons, etc) Large population base from which to draw
soldiers)
The U.S. [cont’d] Economic Power
One-fourth of the world’s gross product Center of technological innocation Most important banks and stockmarkets Massive corporate power Huge trade flows—mutual dependenceis Magnet for high-skilled labor from other
countries Vast personal wealth
The U.S. [cont’d] Cultural Influence
Media English language (2 billion speakers/learners) Pop culture
The U.S. [cont’d] Ideological Influence
Democratic attractiveness Free markets Reputation [does Obama fix this?]
Sustainability of Hegemony
Equilibrium theory says that powers will be balanced, and various theories of decline argue that a state can only remain dominant for so long before it loses the economic, military, and/or political capacity to do so
That raises the question—who might replace the U.S. as a unipolar power, or challenge the U.S. in a bi- or multi-polar system?
Contender #1: European Union Pros
High degree of soft power
Large population Powerful economy Strong education
system Powerful
corporations Relatively large
collective military
Cons Military is weak,
out-dated, and relatively poorly trained
Lags in miltiary tech development
Aging population Lack of unified
decisionmaking structures
Contender #2: China Pros
Huge population Surging economy
and manufacturing capacity
Large military Strong central
government Desire to lead/have
a presence on the global stage
Cons Population strains and
population aging Relative lack of tech
innovation, esp. in military matters
Fragile central government
Economic development is subject to outside disruption
External resource dependence
Lack of military power projection capability
Contender #3: Japan Pros
Tech innovation Robust economy Access to military
tech goodies
Cons Tough
neighborhood, not popular with neighbors
Aging, declining population
External resource dependence
Inward-focused security culture
Contender #4: Russia Pros
Big military Huge resource
base Continental
footprint Strong central
government
Cons Aging, declining,
drunken population Suspicious
neighbors Internal
factionalism
Contender #5: India Pros
Large number of well-educated persons
Huge population (big army!)
Cons Population
pressures High rates of rural
poverty Lack of wealth
Other Potential Powers Brazil Indonesia Iran Nigeria Pakistan