Education for sustainability: Education for sustainability: opportunities and challenges for opportunities and challenges for online and distance educationonline and distance education
Presenters:
Rick Fisher & Allan Smee
Open Polytechnic of New Zealand
About the presentersAbout the presenters
Rick- environmental sciences (teaching, research, practice)
- environmental lawyer
- recent graduate: Open Polytechnic Certificate in Designing & Facilitating E-Learning
Allan
- E-learning advisor
ObjectivesObjectives
To provide a context for online education in a “cleaner, greener” teaching environment
To point out the special nexus that exists between EfS and traditional distance education
To provide an opportunity to explore new e-learning technologies which may be helpful to EfS at various teaching levels
About The Open Polytechnic of New ZealandAbout The Open Polytechnic of New Zealand
30,000 full/part-time students130 programmes/1500 courses
offered by three schools – certificate to degree
Delivery primarily via distance education
Some blended deliveryGrowing role for e-learning
Key definitions:Key definitions:
Education for sustainability:“A multidisciplinary approach to learning that develops the
knowledge, awareness, attitudes, values and skills that will enable individuals and the community towards maintaining and improving the quality of the environment” (MfEnvt 1996)
Traditional distance education:“Geographical separation of teacher and learner, where the gap is
bridged by posted course materials, and some form of communication, whether by letter or telephone” (Peters, 2009)
E-learning:Learning that is facilitated by the use of digital tools and content,
typically involving some kind of interactivity between learners and their teacher or peers (MoEd 2004)
Is distance education greener?Is distance education greener?
Open University (UK) carbon calculation study: Travel and classrooms are the biggest sources of carbon
consumption Distance learning courses led to a whopping 87% less
energy and 85% lower CO2 emissions than full-time, face-to-face, campus-based courses
Within that overall saving, on-line courses showed a fairly minor 20% reduction in energy and 12% reduction in CO2 emissions when compared to print-based courses
FOR MORE INFO...
Roy, R. & Potter, S. (2008). Int J Sust Higher Ed 9:116-130
Key steps before claiming green legitimacy in Key steps before claiming green legitimacy in education deliveryeducation delivery
An environmental policy Support for the policy by senior management An environmental audit Consultation with stakeholders Action Modelling sustainability in operations and
curriculum Result: a framework for legitimacy
The goals of EfSThe goals of EfS
To inform across age/culture/geography
To reach out/gain critical massTo empowerTo facilitate transformative learning
Isn’t this what DE already does?
Shared characteristics: EfS and DEShared characteristics: EfS and DE
Neither require a computer Both attempt to reach geographically isolated students &
disadvantaged/marginalised students Underlying learning pedagogies are similar: -both emphasise vocational education outcomes -both cater to the needs of adult learners -both promote transformative learning -both promote learning that is internally motivated -both promote learning that is self-directed, with enhanced
personal meaning
FOR MORE INFO...
Fisher, R.M. (2008). New Zealand Ann. Rev. Ed. 18:31-46.
Where does e-learning fit?Where does e-learning fit?
Key e-learning teaching pedagogies: Acknowledge different learning styles Develop online programs to enable any-time and
any-place learning Encourage active learning Develop online content within a relevant context Allow for repeated (formative) self-assessment
Good things about e-learning and EfSGood things about e-learning and EfS
Delivery: anything that cuts down transportation costs is good
Delivery: communities of (local) learners are possible, with local wisdom
Niche education is possible Pedagogy: e-learning promotes many of
the same attributes as DE
A few problems…A few problems…
E-learning isn’t primarily for distance education
E-learning requires a computer or similar device(and usually online access)
There is no national e-learning strategy E-learning (in the context of EfS) gets little
attention in tertiary education strategy E-technologies may not be overly green
E-learning Advantages over E-learning Advantages over Traditional Distance EducationTraditional Distance Education Collaboration
“Digital communications technologies have fractured the tyranny of distance beyond repair”Wheeler S.(2009)
– Increases the ability of the learning to communicate with their peers, lecturer/s and wider community
Students are able to contributed ideas, concepts and examples from their on experiences via
– Blogs – online journals– Wikis – online collaborative knowledge bases– Podcasting- online audio presentations
and receive timely feedback from peers and lecturer/s
Use of real-time /online data – Data sharing
• Google Maps and Google Earth - http://earth.google.com/outreach/showcase.html which allow organisation map environmental impacts etc
– Simulations• View the cause and effective of different choices
– Problem Based Learning• Developed potentials solutions to problem and review the impact of there choices.
FOR MORE INFO...
Wheeler , S. (2009) Digital Tribes and Virtual Clans in Wheeler (Ed) Connected Minds and Emerging Cultures pp65-79 Charlotte :USA Information Age Publishing
Flexibility of Delivery Flexibility of Delivery
Delivery of content isn’t restricted to one media – Web based
– CD ROM or USB Drive
– Mobile Phones, Smart Phones, PDA
– Gaming Platforms i.e. Play station, X Box and Wii’s
– and even printed based Content can developed to be delivery format free.
– Delivery method is up to the end user.
Reducing the impactReducing the impact
Reuse content– Content developed as Reusable
Learning Objects (RLOs ) can be share across the Learning community
• Why reinvent the wheel
FOR MORE INFO...
See Merlot (www.merlot.org) a collection of online learning materials that can incorporated in courses