Transcript
Page 1: ELLs who receive no formal language instruction may · (Scarcella and Kinsella) • Academic language is different from everyday ... language proficiency by presenting both the language

Santillana Spotlight on English: A New Generation of ESL materials!

Asystematic,up-to-date,research-basedfocusedapproach with explicit and implicit instruction that capturestheimaginationsofyoungEnglishLanguageLearners(ELLs),meetsthemattheirlevelofproficiencyandmotivatesthemtobesuccessfulandcompetitive,sociallyandacademically,withtheirnative-Englishspeaking peers.

How is Santillana Spotlight on English (SSOE) research-based?

SSOEisaK-5comprehensive,standards-basedprogramthatsynthesizesandappliesthelatestresearch-basedconceptsthatempowerstudentstobecomeproficientintheEnglishlanguageasitpreparesthemtocompetewithnative-Englishspeakingpeers.Theresearch-basedconcepts include the following considerations:

• Oralproficiencyiscriticalandoftenoverlookedininstruction.Itisnotenoughtoteachlanguageminoritychildrenreadingskillsalone:ExtensiveoralEnglishdevelopmentmustbeincorporatedintosuccessfulliteracyinstruction(DianeAugust,theNationalLiteracyPanel,2006).

• Studentsneedasoundfoundationinbothsociallanguage and academic language. Academic language isnotonlythelanguageweneedinschool,butthelanguageweneedforschool.(ScarcellaandKinsella)

• Academiclanguageisdifferentfromeverydayspeechandinformalwriting.Itisthelanguageoftexts,ofacademicdiscussionandformalwriting.Withoutacademiclanguageproficiency,studentswillnotachievelong-termsuccessinschool.(RobinScarcella,2003)

• ELLswhoreceivenoformallanguageinstructionmaydemonstrateoralfluency,butgenerallywillshowcriticalgapsinlanguageknowledgeandvocabulary.(RobinScarcella,2003)

• Academiclanguagemustbecontinuouslydevelopedandexplicitlytaughtacrossallsubjectareas(ScarcellaandKinsella).

• SSOEusesacademiccontentareasasthevehicleforinstruction to set the stage for appropriate levels of cognitivedevelopment(JeanPiaget).

• SSOEusesacademiccontentareastosettheenvironmentforage-appropriateinteraction,whichisengagingandfun(KieranEgan).

• SSOEusesacademiccontentareastopresentcritical-thinking activities that provide movement through theprocessesofthought(BenjaminBloom).

• EffectiveESLprogramsdevelopEnglishlanguageproficiencywhilebuildingliteracyskillsandsubjectareaknowledge(Guarino,Echevaria,Short,SchickForbes&Rueda,2001).

How does SSOE help students transition to the mainstream classroom following the latest research?

SSOEprovidesopportunitiesforELLstogainanddevelopEnglishlanguageproficiencyskills,accessgrade-levelcontent,andsuccessfullytransitiontothemainstreamclassroom like no other! The content areas of language arts,mathematics,science,socialstudies,music,and

art are used as vehicles of direct instruction throughout.SSOEpreparesstudentswiththe

tools necessary to actively participate in mainstreamacademicclasses.Itprovidesopportunities that allow elementary grade students to acquire proficiency in

Academic

language must be continuously developed

and explicitly taught across all subject areas

(Scarcella and Kinsella).

Page 2: ELLs who receive no formal language instruction may · (Scarcella and Kinsella) • Academic language is different from everyday ... language proficiency by presenting both the language

a second language through a sequentially articulated program that extends over the K-5 continuum. The research that confirms this is as follows:

• Childrenenrolledinsecondlanguageprogramsthat are designed to show continuity of caring and continuous progress reach higher levels of second languageproficiency(CurtainandDahlberg,2004).

• SystematicEnglishdevelopmentthroughcarefullystructured exposure to models of age-appropriate academicEnglishbecomesthebasistoprovidestructuredopportunitiestopracticewithdirectEnglishlanguageinstruction(ScarcellaandKinsella)

• SSOEprovidesEnglishLanguageDevelopment(ELD)asadisciplineandasameans to make content area instructionmeaningfulforbothsocial and academic purposes (SusanaDutro,2002).

• SOEunlocksatreasure-troveof language experiences in a risk-free environment (Kate Kinsella,2007).

How does SSOE actively engage students in everyday activities in a non-threatening environment following current research?

TheprogramhasbeendesignedtoeffectivelydevelopEnglishlanguageskillsthroughnaturalcommunication,effectivegroupingstrategies,songs,games,reading,role-play,andprojects.SSOEprovidesmultiple-learningopportunitiesforlanguageusage,phonics,andlanguagestructure. The program recognizes the value-added richnessofstudents’homecultures.Culminatingactivities in each unit provide opportunities for students toshareindividualculturalbackgroundsandrelatethemto American culture. Research indicates that…

• Astudent’sleveloflanguageproficiencydependson the quality and length of exposure to meaningful languageexperiences(Krashen,1981).

• SSOEprovidesvocabularyfrontloadingsothatthe initial focus is on meaningful and functional interactionwithinthecontextofthetargetlanguage,academiccontentandculture(SusanaDutro,2007).

• Theimportanceofincludingastudent’shomeculture in the classroom is a well-documented fundamentalconceptthatshouldbeacomponentintheinstructionalplanforEnglishLanguageLearners(Doherty,Hilberg,Pinal&Tharpe,2003).

• Studentachievementisdirectlycorrelatedtoaguaranteedviablecurriculum.Withchallenginggoals,effectivefeedback,andparentandcommunityinvolvement,aviablecurriculumidentifiesthecontentthat teachers are expected to address and that must beadequatelycoveredintheinstructionaltimeteachershaveavailable.(RobertJ.Marzano,What Works in Schools,2003).

How is SSOE standards-based, and how is its organization compliant with current research?

SSOEmeetsstateandnationalstandards,includingTESOLandWIDA,provideseasy-to-followlessons,andsetstheclassroomasa stage for creativity and success. The Teacher’s Guide for each gradelevelincludesconsistent,

well-articulated and effective instructional strategies thatreflectcurrentresearch.Eachunithasthefollowingsections:

Spotlight on Reading

• Relevantandthematicreadingselectionsthatprovidestudentswiththeopportunitiestoacquiregrammar,expandvocabulary,gainincreasingfluencywithwrittentextsandimprovespeakingskills(Carrel,Devine,andSkey,1988)

• Theintegrationoflistening,speaking,readingandwritingskills,whichiscrucialtodevelopeffectivewritingforELLs(Mangelsdorf,1989).

• Studentsdevelopfluencythroughauthenticandengagingusesoflanguage,bothoralandwritten,andopportunities to practice newly-learned structures in differentcontexts(KinsellaandScarcella).

Student achievement is directly correlated

to a guaranteed viable curriculum.

Page 3: ELLs who receive no formal language instruction may · (Scarcella and Kinsella) • Academic language is different from everyday ... language proficiency by presenting both the language

Spotlight on Language

• Grade-levelcontentbyfrontloadinglanguageandprovidingcomprehensibleinstructionthroughsystematicELDmethodologies,strategiesandtechniques,ateachlevelofEnglishLanguageproficiency(SusanaDutro,2007).

• Well-developedactivitiesthatsupportorallanguagedevelopmentinEnglish,alignedwithhigh-qualityliteracyinstruction(DianeAugust,ReportoftheNationalLiteracyPanel,2006).

• OpportunitiestoreachthehighestlevelofEnglishlanguageproficiencybypresentingboththelanguagefunction(purpose)andtargetform(structure)oftheEnglishlanguage(Pozzi,2004).

Spotlight on Content

• Extensiveorallanguagedevelopmentforsocialandacademic purposes with explicit instruction across subjectareastoincluderelevantvocabulary,syntax,andgrammar,andinthekeycomponentsofreading:phonics,fluency,vocabulary,andtextcomprehension(KateKinsella,2005).

• Instructiongroundedinacademicareassuchasliterature,mathematics,socialsciences,andsciencenotonlyfamiliarizesELLswiththecontentofthedisciplinebutmoreimportantly,itteachesthemhowto use the language required to communicate in the discipline(Mohan,1986).

• Carefullystructuredexposuretomodelsofage-appropriateacademicEnglishthroughdirectlanguageinstruction,whichprovideslotsofopportunitiesforacademicpracticeresultinginsupportive,instructionalfeedback(RobinScarcella,2005).

InstructionthatisbothimplicitandexplicitinEnglishatthestudent’slevelofproficiencyinEnglishtoprovidemeaningful access to grade-level academic content (Casteñedav.Pickard,1986;NCLBSec.1111).

• Presentscontentvocabulary,form,andstructurethrough meaningful interactions and activities in languagearts,mathematics,science,socialstudies,music,andart(Dutro,Kinsella,Scarcella).

How does SSOE’s unit culminating activities bridge home-school differences and reflect current research?

SSOEensureseffectiveinstructionandpresentsalearningenvironmentthatreflects,recognizesandbuildsuponthevalueofthelanguage,cultureandexperiencesofeachchild.Cultureisanintegralpartofthecurriculumand is displayed in the culminating activities as follows:

Impressions

• StudentsbecomeinvolvedinactivitiesthattieU.S.cultureandtheirownculturalbackgrounds,therebybridginghome-schooldifferencesininteractivestyleswhichcanenhancestudents’engagement,motivation,andparticipationinclassroominstruction(DianeAugust,ReportoftheNationalLiteracyPanel,2006).

Project

• ForELLs,relevanceinlearningissignificant.Theyarehighly motivated when they see the value of learning touseEnglishtomeettheireverydayneedsaswellashowtocommunicateinanacademicarea(Snow,Met,andGenesee,1989).

Page 4: ELLs who receive no formal language instruction may · (Scarcella and Kinsella) • Academic language is different from everyday ... language proficiency by presenting both the language

Santillana Spotlight on English: Research Brief References

August, D., Shanahan, T. (2006). Developing Literacy in Second-Language Learners: Report of the National Literacy Panel on Language Minority Children and Youth.Washington,DC:CenterforAppliedLinguistics

Carrell, P., Devine, J., Eskey, D. (Eds.) (1988) Interactive Approaches to Second Language Reading. Cambridge,MA:CambridgeUniversityPress.

Center for Applied Linguistics (2007).What’sDifferentAboutTeachingReadingtoEnglishLanguageLearners?Washington,DC:CenterforAppliedLinguistics.

Chamot, A. U., & O’Malley, J. M. (1994). The CALLA Handbook: How to Implement the Cognitive Academic Language Learning Approach.Reading,MA:Addison-Wesley.

Cummins, J. (1979).“Cognitive/AcademicLanguageProficiency,”LinguisticInterdependence,TheOptimumAgeQuestionandSomeOtherMatters.”Working Papers on Bilingualism.Malden,MA:LanguageLearning.

Doherty, R. W., Hilberg, R. S., Pinal, A., & Tharp, R. G. (2003). Five Standards and Student Achievement, NABE Journal of Research and Practice.Washington,DC:NationalAssociationforBilingualEducation

Dutro, Susana (2007). A Focused Approach to Instruction for English Learners.RiversideCountyOfficeofEducation.Riverside,CA:EnglishLearnerSymposium

Dutro, S., Moran, C. (2002).RethinkingEnglishLanguageInstruction.English Learners: Reaching the Highest Level of English Literacy.Newark,DE:InternationalReadingAssociation.

Guarino, A.J., Echevarria, J., Short, D., Schick, J.E., Forbes, S., & Rueda, R. (2001). The Sheltered Instruction Observation Protocol.Washington,DC:TheJournalofResearchinEducation.

Halliday, M.A.K. (1973). Language in a Social Perspective. Explorations in the Functions of Language.London,England:EdwardArnold.

Leinhardt, G. & Green, J.G. (1986). The Cognitive Skill of Teaching.Washington,DC:JournalofEducationalPsychology.

Kinsella, K. (2005). Words Are Not Created Equally: A Framework for Prioritizing Vocabulary for Rigorous Instruction and Assessment in Linguistically and Culturally Diverse Classrooms.Anaheim,CA:AccountabilityInstituteforEnglishLearnersandImmigrantStudents.

Kinsella, K. (2006). Strategies to Bolster Academic English Language Use and Lesson Engagement. Fresno,CA:CATESOLConference.

Kinsella, K. (2006). Structured “Academic Talk” for English Learners: A Key to Narrowing the Verbal Gap in K-12 Classrooms.Washington,DC:OELAFifthAnnualCelebrateOurRisingStarsSummit.

Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition.Oxford,England:Pergamon.

Krashen, S. (1985). Language Acquisition and Language Education.Pearson:AlemanyPress.

Mangelsdorf, K. (1989).“ParallelsBetweenSpeakingandWritinginSecondLanguageAcquisition.”InD.M.Johnson&D.H.Roen(Eds.),Richness in Writing: Empowering Language Minority Students (pp. 134-45).NewYork,NY:Longman.

Marzano, R. (2003). What Works in Schools: Translating Research into Action.Alexandria,VA:AssociationforSupervisionandCurriculumDevelopment.

Mohan, B.A. (1986).“TheKnowledgeFramework”fromLanguage and Content.NewYork,NY:Addison-Wesley.

National Reading Panel (2001). Put Reading First: The Research Building Blocks for Teaching Children to Read.Rockville,MD:TheNationalReadingPanel.

Scarcella, R. (2003). Academic English: A Conceptual Framework.SantaBarbara,CA:UniversityofCaliforniaLinguisticMinorityResearchInstitute.

Snow, M., Met, M., Genesse, F. (1989). A Conceptual Framework for the Integration of Language and Content in Second/Foreign Language Instruction. Alexandria,VA:TESOLQuarterly.

2105 NW 86 Avenue, Miami, FL 33122Order Toll-Free 1-800-245-8584 Fax: 1-888-248-9518


Top Related