Download - Empathy and Pro-Social Behavior in Rats
EMPATHY AND PRO-SOCIAL BEHAVIOR IN RATSEmma Glanzer
Empathy
empathynoun1. The intellectual identification with or vicarious
experiencing of the feelings, thoughts, or attitudes of another.
2. The ability to understand and share the feelings of another.
3. A multilayered phenomenon that starts with automatic state matching based on motor mimicry and shared neural representations, to which cognitive perspective taking is secondary.
Russian Doll Model of Empathy
de Waal, F. B. M., “The Antiquity of Empathy”. Science. 336 (2012).
Pro-sociality and Empathy
Empathy:The capacity to recognize and share feelings experienced by another individual.
Pro-sociality:The tendency to behave so as to benefit another individual.
Hypotheses
Pro-social rescue behavior in rats is not motivated by empathic feeling.
Pro-social rescue behavior in rats is motivated by empathic feeling.
H0 HA
Bartal, I.B., Decety, J., and Mason, P. “Empathy and Pro-social Behavior in Rats”. Science. 334 (2011): 1427-1430.
Impact Factor: 31.03
Study I
Study I Hypotheses
Rats are not capable of empathically motivated helping behavior.
Rats are capable of empathically motivated helping behavior.
H0 HA
Materials and Methods: Subjects
Sprague-Dawley
3-6 months old 46 male, 12
female Housed in pairs Tails marked for
identification
Materials and Methods: Set-up
50x50 cm plexiglass arena
25x8.75 cm restrainer
Top-mounted video camera to record movement
Heterodyne recorder to detect vocalizations
Harvard Apparatus rodent restrainer.
Materials and Methods: Conditions
Trapped: n = 30Empty: n = 20Object: n = 82+ Empty: n = 12
Pre-trial Procedures
Habituation Housed in pairs 2
weeks Handled 4 days pre-
experiment Placed in arena 1
hour Returned to home
cage
Free-rat Determination Measure of
boldness Time-to-edge
latency Interesting effect
between latencies of openers and non-openers
Experimental Procedure
1. Trapped rat placed in restrainer2. Free rat marked and placed in arena3. Start sessions 90 minutes (reduce to 60)4. Record video and audio5. Rats remained in arena for duration of
session6. Repeated one session/day for 12 days.
Experimental Footage
Two Problems
Free rats didn’t open restrainer Investigator opened
door halfway Did not count as
door-opening
Trapped rat opened door from inside Plastic blocker inserted, used for remainder of
sessions Removed if free rat opened door
Alarm calls greater for trapped condition. Trapped rats were experiencing stress.
RESULTS: Alarm Calls
Click icon to add picture
Free rats in trapped condition more active in second half of sessions.
RESULTS: Activity Ratio
Click icon to add picture
Latency to door-opening shortest for rats in trapped condition.Proportion of trapped-condition rats opening door increased.
RESULTS: Door-opening
Click icon to add picture
Freezing time after door-opening decreased across sessions.
RESULTS: Freezing Time
Click icon to add picture
Females opened door at shorter latencies.Females more active in trapped condition.More female rats became openers than male rats.
RESULTS: Sex Differences
Click icon to add picture
Free rats in trapped condition spent more time at arena center.
RESULTS: Movement Distribution
Click icon to add picture
Results
Trapped rat was in distress Free rats worked to alleviate stress
Opened door at greater frequencies Opened door at shorter latencies Increased activity until door was opened
Action was deliberate Sex differences
Experiment II
To determine whether “anticipation of social interaction is necessary to motivate door-opening”.
9 pairs of rats that were openers Modified set up
Two arenas joined by restrainer Trapped rat could only egress into
separate arena Two conditions
Separated Empty Separated Cagemate
One session/day for 29 and 27 days
Rats stopped opening the door of the empty restrainer.
RESULTS: Door-opening
Click icon to add picture
Rats stopped opening the door of the empty restrainer.
RESULTS: Door-opening
Click icon to add picture
Experiment III
To examine the relative value of liberating a trapped cagemate.
New set of rats, same strain and age
Modified set up One arena with two restrainers
Two conditions Chocolate Empty Chocolate Cagemate
One session/day for 12 days
Chocolate-containing restrainer opened more quickly than empty restrainer.
RESULTS: Door-opening Latencies
Click icon to add picture
No difference in door-opening latencies for chocolate- and cagemate-containing restrainers.
RESULTS: Door-opening Latencies
Click icon to add picture
Discussion
Desire for social contact Free rats liberated cagemate even when
contact was prevented Stop alarm calls
Alarm calls occurred too infrequently Curiosity
Curiosity extinguishes within trial time frame
Coincidence with activity levels Door-opening was hard, could not occur
accidentally
Study I Hypotheses
Rats are not capable of empathically motivated helping behavior.
Rats are capable of empathically motivated helping behavior.
H0 HA
Critique
Experiment conducted during rat’s light cycle
Opening door halfway
No data tables
Poorly explained procedures
Silberberg, A., Allouch, C., Sandfort, S., Kearns, D., Karpel, H., and Slotnick, B. “Desire for social contact, not empathy, may explain rescue behavior in rats”. Animal Cognition. (2013).
Impact Factor: 2.71
Study II
Study II Hypotheses
Pro-social behaviors are motivated by social contact, as free rats will not learn to liberate a trapped rat when absence of social contact is the outcome of behaviors.
Pro-social behaviors are not motivated by social contact, as free rats will learn to liberate a trapped rat when absence of social contact is the outcome of behaviors.
H0 HA
Materials and Methods: Subjects
Sprague-Dawley 3-6 months old 12 females, 6 pairs Housed in pairs Habituated as in
Study I
Materials and Methods: Set-up
Two plastic arenas 41x58 cm each Joined by restrainer
25x8.75 cm restrainer Doors recessed 2.1 cm Opened by rat contact
with metal strip sensor on free rat’s side
Materials and Methods: Conditions All 12 rats participated in each condition sequentially Condition 1
Free rat contact opens distal door 30 minute sessions, 15 sessions
Condition 2 Free rat contact opens near door, permitting social
contact 30 minute sessions, 15 sessions
Condition 3 Free rat contact opens distal door 30 minute sessions, 27 sessions
Experimental Procedure1. Trapped rat placed in restrainer2. Free rat placed in arena3. Session duration 30 minutes4. Investigators observe rat behavior5. Repeated one session/day for 15 days,
then move to next condition6. End with 27 sessions of Condition 3
Latencies increased across Condition 1.Latencies decreased between Conditions 1 and 2.
RESULTS: Door-opening Latencies
Click icon to add picture
Response rate decreased across Condition 1.Response rate increased between Conditions 1 and 3.
RESULTS: Door-opening Frequencies
Click icon to add picture
Experiment II
To determine if frequent door-sensor contacts are due to free rat’s motivation to be near cagemate.
Same subjects and materials
Continue Condition 3 for 1 session Quantify:
Return time in restrainer Free rat contact with restrainer
Introduce Condition 4 Fifteen 30-minute sessions No action by free rat will
release trapped rat
3 of 6 free rats spend majority of time in contact with restrainer.4 of 6 trapped rats spend majority of time after door opening in restrainer.
RESULTS: Video Scores
Click icon to add picture
No decrease in response rate.
RESULTS: Latency and Frequency
Click icon to add picture
RESULTS: Experiments I and II
Result Empathy
Social Contac
tCondition 1: Latencies increased and frequencies decreased ✓
Condition 2: Latencies decreased across sessions ✓ ✓
Condition 3: Response latency remained short ✓
Condition 3: Response frequency remained high ✓
Condition 4: Free rat responses did not decrease ✓
Discussion
Difference in trapped rat behavior between Conditions 1 and 2
Free rat’s responses are not outcome-dependent.
Study II Hypotheses
Pro-social behaviors are motivated by social contact, as free rats will not learn to liberate a trapped rat when absence of social contact is the outcome of behaviors.
Pro-social behaviors are not motivated by social contact, as free rats will learn to liberate a trapped rat even when absence of social contact is the outcome of behaviors.
H0 HA
Critique Graphs hard to interpret No frequency data for Condition 2 Video scoring
Snout contacts not counted Trapped rat position not scored when free rat was
on top of restrainer Poor analysis
Poor design for opening mechanism Analysis of Condition 4
Is pro-social behavior in rats motivated by empathy?
Hypotheses
Pro-social rescue behavior in rats is not motivated by empathic feeling.
Pro-social rescue behavior in rats is motivated by empathic feeling.
H0 HA