![Page 1: Etika Publikasi Ilmiah dan Research Misconduct](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012610/619d18396f32b032524d1052/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Etika Publikasi Ilmiah dan Research Misconduct
Ide Bagus SiaputraFakultas Psikologi, Universitas Surabaya
![Page 2: Etika Publikasi Ilmiah dan Research Misconduct](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012610/619d18396f32b032524d1052/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Pemerintah akan terbitkan aturan tentang integritas akademikSelasa, 19 Februari 2019 20:46 WIB
Dimyati memaklumi jika masalah integritas itu terjadi karena ketidaktahuan, namun tidak akan menoleransi kalau itu merupakan kesengajaan.
![Page 3: Etika Publikasi Ilmiah dan Research Misconduct](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012610/619d18396f32b032524d1052/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
![Page 4: Etika Publikasi Ilmiah dan Research Misconduct](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012610/619d18396f32b032524d1052/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-05386-5
The continued citation of retracted papers — or ‘zombie’ publications —pollutes the scientific literature with fatally flawed studies. The problem is amplified by the common practice of accessing papers through third-party websites such as Google Scholar, ResearchGate and Sci-Hub, which generally do not link to retraction notices.
Publishers can ensure that citations of zombie publications are caught before new papers go to press by running AUTOMATED CROSS-CHECKS of manuscript reference lists against the Retraction Watch database of retracted papers (http://retractiondatabase.org).
![Page 5: Etika Publikasi Ilmiah dan Research Misconduct](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012610/619d18396f32b032524d1052/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
https://retractionwatch.com/the-retraction-watch-leaderboard/top-10-most-highly-cited-
retracted-papers/
![Page 6: Etika Publikasi Ilmiah dan Research Misconduct](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012610/619d18396f32b032524d1052/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
What a massive database of retracted papers reveals about science publishing’s ‘death penalty’
By Jeffrey Brainard, Jia YouOct. 25, 2018 , 2:00 PM
Much of the rise appears to reflect IMPROVED OVERSIGHT at a growing number of journals.
![Page 7: Etika Publikasi Ilmiah dan Research Misconduct](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012610/619d18396f32b032524d1052/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
![Page 8: Etika Publikasi Ilmiah dan Research Misconduct](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012610/619d18396f32b032524d1052/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
http://ecojoin.org/index.php/EJE/article/view/388
![Page 9: Etika Publikasi Ilmiah dan Research Misconduct](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012610/619d18396f32b032524d1052/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Serological Evidence of Ebola Virus Infection in Indonesian Orangutans
Chairul A. Nidom ,Eri Nakayama ,Reviany V. Nidom,Mohamad Y. Alamudi,Syafril Daulay,Indi N. L. P. Dharmayanti,Yoes P. Dachlan,Mohamad Amin,Manabu Igarashi,Hiroko Miyamoto,Reiko Yoshida,Ayato Takada
Published: July 18, 2012
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0040740
![Page 10: Etika Publikasi Ilmiah dan Research Misconduct](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012610/619d18396f32b032524d1052/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Serological Evidence of Ebola Virus Infection in Indonesian Orangutans
Chairul A. Nidom ,Eri Nakayama ,Reviany V. Nidom,Mohamad Y. Alamudi,Syafril Daulay,Indi N. L. P. Dharmayanti,Yoes P. Dachlan,Mohamad Amin,Manabu Igarashi,Hiroko Miyamoto,Reiko Yoshida,Ayato Takada
Published: July 18, 2012
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0040740
![Page 11: Etika Publikasi Ilmiah dan Research Misconduct](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012610/619d18396f32b032524d1052/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
![Page 12: Etika Publikasi Ilmiah dan Research Misconduct](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012610/619d18396f32b032524d1052/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
https://reader.elsevier.com/reader/sd/pii/S0012821X18301237?token=A6F71D3AE7C9239D9DD5291991015FA1BBE70EB08A98922A870E7191069F91A31F2343336023A0CB00845DCFD3E46AC1
![Page 13: Etika Publikasi Ilmiah dan Research Misconduct](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012610/619d18396f32b032524d1052/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
https://reader.elsevier.com/reader/sd/pii/S1026918518300027?token=EEADBC143356B173619AF53FD730509B18D59BA7A606FDC511FA713927B694C6E8D3EF6FAE96E7D664CE53D9B02484D0
![Page 14: Etika Publikasi Ilmiah dan Research Misconduct](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012610/619d18396f32b032524d1052/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
This article has been retracted at the request of Editor-in-Chief. After a thorough investigation, the Editor has concluded that the acceptance of this article was based
upon the positive advice of three illegitimate reviewer reports. The reports were
submitted from email accounts which were provided to the journal as suggested reviewers during the
submission of the article. Although purportedly real reviewer accounts, the Editor has concluded that these were not of appropriate, independent reviewers. This
manipulation of the peer-review process represents a clear violation of the fundamentals
of peer review, our publishing policies, and publishing ethics standards. Apologies are offered to the reviewers whose identities were assumed and to the readers of the journal that
this deception was not detected during the submission process.
https://reader.elsevier.com/reader/sd/pii/S1026918518300027?token=EEADBC143356B173619AF53FD730509B18D59BA7A606FDC511FA713927B694C6E8D3EF6FAE96E7D664CE53D9B02484D0
![Page 15: Etika Publikasi Ilmiah dan Research Misconduct](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012610/619d18396f32b032524d1052/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
https://www.cureus.com/articles/6371-redefining-health-implication-for-value-based-healthcare-reform/retraction
![Page 16: Etika Publikasi Ilmiah dan Research Misconduct](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012610/619d18396f32b032524d1052/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
http://journal.uinjkt.ac.id/index.php/ti/article/view/6991
![Page 17: Etika Publikasi Ilmiah dan Research Misconduct](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012610/619d18396f32b032524d1052/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Wanted
https://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2018/06/10/wanted-6000-new-journals-to-publish-150000-papers.html
The growth in the number of academic papers outside Scopus-indexed journals is also impressive. Citing Google Scholar, the ministry’s academic database, Sinta, showed that in 2013 there were 86,510 papers and this grew to 157,892 in 2017. (Shutterstock/-)
![Page 18: Etika Publikasi Ilmiah dan Research Misconduct](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012610/619d18396f32b032524d1052/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Harvard teaching hospital
https://retractionwatch.com/2017/04/27/harvard-teaching-hospital-pay-10-million-settle-research-misconduct-allegations/
![Page 19: Etika Publikasi Ilmiah dan Research Misconduct](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012610/619d18396f32b032524d1052/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Famous Harvard economist
https://retractionwatch.com/2018/06/04/famous-harvard-economist-reused-parts-of-2002-paper-multiple-times-says-journal/
![Page 20: Etika Publikasi Ilmiah dan Research Misconduct](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012610/619d18396f32b032524d1052/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Revolt over an editor?
https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2018/04/30/prominent-psychologist-resigns-journal-editor-over-allegations-over-self-citation
![Page 21: Etika Publikasi Ilmiah dan Research Misconduct](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012610/619d18396f32b032524d1052/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Retracted: Effects of Nano-Hydroxyapatite
![Page 22: Etika Publikasi Ilmiah dan Research Misconduct](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012610/619d18396f32b032524d1052/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Effects of ChoukronPlatelet
![Page 23: Etika Publikasi Ilmiah dan Research Misconduct](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012610/619d18396f32b032524d1052/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Effects of ChoukronPlatelet
![Page 24: Etika Publikasi Ilmiah dan Research Misconduct](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012610/619d18396f32b032524d1052/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Unfortunately, figure 3 of this paper depicts HE-stained tissue sections identical to those depicted in figure 4 in a 2018 paper utilizing a rabbit model of mandibular damage and repair titled “Effect of Choukroun Platelet-Rich Fibrin Combined with Autologous Micro-Morselized Bone on the Repair of Mandibular Defects in Rabbits” and published in the J Oral Maxillofac Surg., Epub 2017 Jun 2.
12
AB
![Page 25: Etika Publikasi Ilmiah dan Research Misconduct](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012610/619d18396f32b032524d1052/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
12
AB
12
AB
![Page 26: Etika Publikasi Ilmiah dan Research Misconduct](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012610/619d18396f32b032524d1052/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Drosophila Muller F Elements
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25740935
1.014 pengarang
![Page 27: Etika Publikasi Ilmiah dan Research Misconduct](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012610/619d18396f32b032524d1052/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
5,154 pengarang
![Page 28: Etika Publikasi Ilmiah dan Research Misconduct](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012610/619d18396f32b032524d1052/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017/09/pay-or-retract-survey-creators-demands-money-rile-some-health-researchers
![Page 29: Etika Publikasi Ilmiah dan Research Misconduct](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012610/619d18396f32b032524d1052/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
![Page 30: Etika Publikasi Ilmiah dan Research Misconduct](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012610/619d18396f32b032524d1052/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
http://www.ijcmph.com/index.php/ijcmph/article/view/675/1042
![Page 31: Etika Publikasi Ilmiah dan Research Misconduct](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012610/619d18396f32b032524d1052/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
http://www.ijcmph.com/index.php/ijcmph/article/view/675/1042
![Page 32: Etika Publikasi Ilmiah dan Research Misconduct](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012610/619d18396f32b032524d1052/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
https://www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2016/16_0044r.htm
![Page 33: Etika Publikasi Ilmiah dan Research Misconduct](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012610/619d18396f32b032524d1052/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
https://www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2016/16_0044r.htm
![Page 34: Etika Publikasi Ilmiah dan Research Misconduct](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012610/619d18396f32b032524d1052/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
• Trubow forwarded us email correspondence that led to another recent retraction in the International Journal of Integrative Medical Sciences for a similar copyright infringement issue regarding unlicensed use of the MMAS scale.
• As part of that correspondence, the first author also apologized to Trubow for the use of the scale, saying the work was done by students who found the information ONLINE FOR FREE. The researcher answered the questions Trubow sent, then ASKED that the fee be waived, as the work was done without any grant.
• Trubow responded on December 28, 2016:– There will be a cost of $750.00 (USD). This is a reduced fee for a
corrective license. The usual cost for serious infringements is $1000.00. It costs us a lot of money to investigate and correct the infringements If you don’t want to pay the fee, I will not prepare the license. Let me know.
• A few hours later, the author wrote back, saying they were no longer interested in using the scale, and HAD ASKED THE JOURNAL TO REMOVE THE PAPER.
![Page 35: Etika Publikasi Ilmiah dan Research Misconduct](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012610/619d18396f32b032524d1052/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
http://www.apa.org/about/contact/copyright/index.aspx
![Page 36: Etika Publikasi Ilmiah dan Research Misconduct](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012610/619d18396f32b032524d1052/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
CASE NUMBER : 18-01CASE TEXT (ANONYMISED)
A researcher has published a paper in our journal using a scale published in 2008. She wrote to the scale developer in 2014/2015 at least three times (emails are on file) before the start of the project, but the scale developer did not respond despite repeated email reminders. No indication of the need for a license was received. In 2017, when the researcher published the paper using the above scale, she was contacted by a person claiming that he was representing the scale's developer and asked for a retrospective license and license fee, and threatened that if the she did not apply for a retrospective license and pay the license fee, she may need to take legal responsibility and retract the published paper. He also said that if she does not pay the fee, then the team’s lawyer would contact her. The name of the lawyer is given, with a gmailaccount. No firm name or any other information is provided. The researcher has searched the internet and found examples of this person asking other people to apply for a retrospective license and receiving money.
https://publicationethics.org/case/license-using-published-scale
FOLLOW UP : The author withdrew the paper. The journal considers the case closed.RESOLUTION : Case ClosedYEAR : 2018
COPE
![Page 37: Etika Publikasi Ilmiah dan Research Misconduct](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012610/619d18396f32b032524d1052/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
CASE NUMBER : 18-04CASE TEXT (ANONYMISED)
We have received a number of manuscripts involving a published scale where the scale’s developer is known to comb the literature and ask those who used the scale for research to pay for a retroactive license, sometimes asking for very large sums of money.
https://publicationethics.org/case/licence-published-scaleRESOLUTION : On-goingYEAR : 2018
ADVICE:The Forum asked if the journal had sought legal advice. There are copyright and licensing issues here that need to be addressed. Who holds copyright on the scale? Is the right to use the scale also copyrighted? … The Forum agreed THIS IS A VERY DIFFICULT ISSUE, with no easy solution.
A suggestion was to write an editorial, highlighting this issue. … The editor might consider contacting other editors and producing a joint editorial or opinion piece, highlighting the issues around this type of behaviour and holding authors to ransom in this way, and emphasizing the fact that this is not good for the advancement of scientific knowledge or in the public interest.
![Page 38: Etika Publikasi Ilmiah dan Research Misconduct](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012610/619d18396f32b032524d1052/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
https://irb.upenn.edu/sites/default/files/2018-11-06%20v2%20Notice%20to%20Investigators%20re%20MMAS.pdf
![Page 39: Etika Publikasi Ilmiah dan Research Misconduct](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012610/619d18396f32b032524d1052/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4656225/table/Tab2/?report=objectonly
![Page 40: Etika Publikasi Ilmiah dan Research Misconduct](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012610/619d18396f32b032524d1052/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
What is your policy regarding access to critical research
https://jmir.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/360000547811
Using copyright protected questionnaires and instrumentsWe explicitly discourage the use of copyright protected instruments. We encourage the development and validation of alternatives to copyright protected instruments.
The Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) has recently discussed an increasing number of cases …. "the scale’s developer is known to … ask those who used the scale … to pay for a retroactive license, sometimes asking for very large sums of money" (https://publicationethics.org/case/licence-published-scale)
COPE condemned "this type of behaviour and holding authors to ransom in this way" and recommends to emphasize "the fact that this is not good for the advancement of scientific knowledge or in the public interest".
![Page 41: Etika Publikasi Ilmiah dan Research Misconduct](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012610/619d18396f32b032524d1052/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
https://jmir.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/360000547811
JMIR has first hand experience with the following scale developers who have contacted us or the author threatening legal action. As a result, we strongly discourage authors to use these scales (and if they are used, authors are required to upload license agreements): MMAS
JMIR had to publish MULTIPLE CORRECTIONS. As a result of the behavior of these
scale developers, JMIR has a standing SPECIAL CALL FOR PAPERS for short paper instruments or electronic tools licensed under Creative Commons or available under an Open Source license that can be used instead of MMAS to measure medication adherence, and we WILL WAIVE THE ARTICLE SUBMISSION FEE for such development and validation papers describing new instruments that can be used as a free alternative to MMAS.
![Page 42: Etika Publikasi Ilmiah dan Research Misconduct](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012610/619d18396f32b032524d1052/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Wanted
https://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2018/06/10/wanted-6000-new-journals-to-publish-150000-papers.html
The growth in the number of academic papers outside Scopus-indexed journals is also impressive. Citing Google Scholar, the ministry’s academic database, Sinta, showed that in 2013 there were 86,510 papers and this grew to 157,892 in 2017. (Shutterstock/-)
![Page 43: Etika Publikasi Ilmiah dan Research Misconduct](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012610/619d18396f32b032524d1052/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
![Page 44: Etika Publikasi Ilmiah dan Research Misconduct](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012610/619d18396f32b032524d1052/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
![Page 45: Etika Publikasi Ilmiah dan Research Misconduct](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012610/619d18396f32b032524d1052/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
![Page 46: Etika Publikasi Ilmiah dan Research Misconduct](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012610/619d18396f32b032524d1052/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
![Page 47: Etika Publikasi Ilmiah dan Research Misconduct](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012610/619d18396f32b032524d1052/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
https://i2.wp.com/writeonwithjamie.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/academic-epidemic-2.png?resize=300%2C300&ssl=1
![Page 48: Etika Publikasi Ilmiah dan Research Misconduct](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012610/619d18396f32b032524d1052/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
Nilai Integritas Akademik
• kejujuran,
• kredibilitas,
• kewajaran,
• kehormatan dan
• tanggung jawab
• KEBERANIAN
![Page 49: Etika Publikasi Ilmiah dan Research Misconduct](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012610/619d18396f32b032524d1052/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
Kerangka Kerja untuk menumbuhkan kebijakanINTEGRITAS AKADEMIK yang dapat diteladani
Figure 1: Framework for enacting exemplary academic integrity policy (Bretag & Mahmud 2013, under review)
![Page 50: Etika Publikasi Ilmiah dan Research Misconduct](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012610/619d18396f32b032524d1052/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
• Regular review of academic integrity policy and process: Telaah dan perbaikan berkelanjutan.
• Academic integrity champions: penghargaan bagipemenang dan pahlawan.
• Academic integrity education for all stakeholders:pendidikan bagi semua.
• Student engagement: pelibatan (maha)siswa. • Robust decision making systems: sistem dan
penanggungjawab.• Record keeping for evaluation: pendokumentasian
terpusat.
Enam rekomendasi untuk menanamkan danmenumbuhkan budaya integritas akademik
www.unisa.edu.au/EAIP
![Page 51: Etika Publikasi Ilmiah dan Research Misconduct](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012610/619d18396f32b032524d1052/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
![Page 52: Etika Publikasi Ilmiah dan Research Misconduct](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012610/619d18396f32b032524d1052/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
• Tindaklanjuttemuan & laporan
• Investigasi
•Rekomendasi
• Advokasi
• Rehabilitasi(nama dan perilaku)
• Sanksi
• Pengembangan diri
• Training of trainer
• Pelatihan dan lokakarya
• Evaluasi integritas akademik
• Evaluasi etika publikasi
• Dasar Hukum
• Latar belakang
• Tujuan
• Lingkup dan Batasan
• Identifikasi
• Ragam d& Taksonomi Pembinaan
Mitigasi
(ps. 1-12)
PembinaanPrevensi
13-16
Penanggulangan
Penyampaian& penanganan
laporan
17-21
Penanggulangan
Sanksi
(ps. 22-34)
Rehabilitasi
![Page 53: Etika Publikasi Ilmiah dan Research Misconduct](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012610/619d18396f32b032524d1052/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
• Appropriate conduct : Tepat (sesuai aturan)Diterima secara luas sebagai praktik ilmiah yang baik.
• Misconduct (Pelanggaran)– Questionable conduct (diragukan/dipertanyakan)
Tidak ada aturan yang jelas tapi pelaku biasanya malu mengakui atauenggan mengungkapkannya.
– Inappropriate conduct (tidak/kurang tepat)Aturan ada namun bervariasi antar disiplin ilmu, negara, lembaga, dan/atau jurnal.
– Blatant misconduct (pelanggaran secara terang-terangan)Pelanggaran terhadap aturan yang sudah jelas dan universal.
Taksonomi Pelanggaran dalam Riset(Hall & Martin, 2018)
![Page 54: Etika Publikasi Ilmiah dan Research Misconduct](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012610/619d18396f32b032524d1052/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
Perilaku yang Tepat, Dipertanyakan, Tidak Tepat, danPelanggaran Terang-terangan (Hall & Martin, 2018)
ManipulasiData
Winsorization*
HARKing
Melakukan pemilihan data
Menghilangkan data
Fabrikasi data
Falsifikasi data
Winsorization membobot lebih rendah atau memodifikasi skor outlier agar lebih sesuai dengan sampel.HARKing: hypothesizing after the results are know
![Page 55: Etika Publikasi Ilmiah dan Research Misconduct](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012610/619d18396f32b032524d1052/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
Perilaku yang Tepat, Dipertanyakan, Tidak Tepat, danPelanggaran Terang-terangan (Hall & Martin, 2018)
KaryaOrang Lain
Mengambil dan membangun di atas hasilkarya orang lain
Muncuplik kalimat orang lain, memberikanpengakuan namun tanpa tanda petik
Mengambil serangkaian kalimat tanpasumber dan tanda petik
Kesalahan dalam melakukan kutipan ataumengakui karya orang lain
Plagiarisme seluruh naskah atau bagian
Secara sengaja menghilangkan suatu bagiandalam sebuah karya (mis. proposal)
![Page 56: Etika Publikasi Ilmiah dan Research Misconduct](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012610/619d18396f32b032524d1052/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
Perilaku yang Tepat, Dipertanyakan, Tidak Tepat, danPelanggaran Terang-terangan (Hall & Martin, 2018)
KaryaSendiri
Berusaha keras melewatkan karya sendiri
Menghindari swa-sitasi secara berlebihanMemaksimalkan luaran penelitian
Swa-sitasi berlebihan (padahal tidak perlu/wajib)
Melaporkan penelitian secara tumpang-tindihPublikasi secara salami (membagi kecil-kecil)
Swa-plagiarismeMelaporkan hasil penelitian yang sama secara
berulang-ulang (publikasi ganda)Menggunakan teori atau data yang sama untuk
memberikan simpulan yang berbeda (hanya untukmenerbitkan artikel berbeda)
![Page 57: Etika Publikasi Ilmiah dan Research Misconduct](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012610/619d18396f32b032524d1052/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
Perilaku yang Tepat, Dipertanyakan, Tidak Tepat, danPelanggaran Terang-terangan (Hall & Martin, 2018)
Kepengarangan
Melibatkan semua orang yang memilikikontribusi substansial
Mewajibkan seseorang menjadi pengarang(kecuali untuk pembimbing doktor/PhD)
Ghost authorship (menghilangkan orang)
Gift authorship (melibatkan orang)
Gift colluding (memberikan bantuan)
Gagal mengakui adanya konflik kepentingan
![Page 58: Etika Publikasi Ilmiah dan Research Misconduct](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012610/619d18396f32b032524d1052/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
Klasifikasi Kesalahan Penelitian(Kuroki, 2018)
• Kesalahan kelas satu (Class I): Kebenaran
– (1) Fabrikasi
– (2) Falsifikasi
• Kesalahan kelas dua (Class II): Kepercayaan
– (1) Plagiarisme terhadap naskah/teks
– (2) Tidak dapat direproduksi (Irreproducibility)
– (3) Praktik penelitian yang tidak tepat
• Kesalahan kelas tiga (Class III): Risiko terhadap faktorkeamanan produk kesehatan dan industri
– (1) Risiko atas keamanan penggunaan produk kesehatan
– (2) Risiko atas keamanan penggunaan produk industri
![Page 59: Etika Publikasi Ilmiah dan Research Misconduct](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012610/619d18396f32b032524d1052/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
• Access: mudah diakses, dibaca, ditulis denganbaik, jelas, dan ringkas.
• Approach: proses pendidikan dan dilakukan sejakdini
• Responsibility: pemerataan tanggung jawabuntuk semua yang terlibat.
• Support: sistem pendukung (prosedur, sumberdaya, kegiatan)
• Detail: penjelasan secara lengkap tapi tidakberlebihan.
Lima elemen utama kebijakan integitasakademik
www.unisa.edu.au/EAIP
![Page 60: Etika Publikasi Ilmiah dan Research Misconduct](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012610/619d18396f32b032524d1052/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
![Page 61: Etika Publikasi Ilmiah dan Research Misconduct](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012610/619d18396f32b032524d1052/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
Kumpulan standar atau pedoman etis tentang(proses) publikasi demi tercapainya publikasiilmiah yang berkualitas tinggi, kepercayaan
publik pada temuan penelitian, danmemberikan penghargaan kepada pengarangsesuai dengan ide (gagasan) yang dihasilkan.
Biomedcentral (2019)
Etika Publikasi
https://www.biomedcentral.com/getpublished/writing-resources/publication-ethics
![Page 62: Etika Publikasi Ilmiah dan Research Misconduct](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012610/619d18396f32b032524d1052/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
• Etika publikasi berfokus pada proses tata kelolapublikasi secara etis.
• Integritas ilmiah/akademik berfokus pengenalandan penerapan nilai-nilai mendasar terkaitperilaku berintegritas.– Honesty (kejujuran)– Trust (kepercayaan)– Fairness (keadilan/kesetaraan)– Respect (kehormatan/penghargaan) – Responsibility (tanggungjawab)– Courage (keberanian)
Etika Publikasi dan Integritas Ilmiah
![Page 63: Etika Publikasi Ilmiah dan Research Misconduct](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012610/619d18396f32b032524d1052/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
• Tindakan yang didasari nilai-nilai kejujuran, kepercayaan, keadilan, kehormatan, dan rasa tanggungjawab dalam proses belajar, mengajar, dan penelitian.
• Penting dimiliki dan dilaksanakan olehmaha(siswa), guru/dosen, peneliti, dan tenagaprofesional di lingkungan akademik.
Exemplary Academic Integrity Project (EAIP): Embedding and extending exemplary academic integrity policy and support frameworks across the higher education sector (2013), Plain English
definition of Academic Integrity, Office for Learning and Teaching Strategic Commissioned Project 2012-2013, http: www.unisa.edu.au/EAIP .
Integritas Akademik (1)
![Page 64: Etika Publikasi Ilmiah dan Research Misconduct](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012610/619d18396f32b032524d1052/html5/thumbnails/64.jpg)
• Kejujuran, kepercayaan, keadilan, kehormatan, danrasa tanggungjawab Keohane(1999)
• Keberanian (menghadapitekanan dan tantangan; Fishman (2014)
Integritas Akademik (2)
![Page 65: Etika Publikasi Ilmiah dan Research Misconduct](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012610/619d18396f32b032524d1052/html5/thumbnails/65.jpg)
• Etika publikasi lebih berfokus pada prosespelaporan hasi penelitian (pasca-penelitian)
• Etika penelitian lebih berfokus pada penelitidan proses berlangsungnya penelitian
Etika Publikasi dan Etika Penelitian
![Page 66: Etika Publikasi Ilmiah dan Research Misconduct](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012610/619d18396f32b032524d1052/html5/thumbnails/66.jpg)
• Etika penelitian lebih berfokus pada penelitidan proses berlangsungnya penelitian– Hak asasi, privasi, dan kerahasiaan
– Budaya dan warisan budaya
– Pendaftaran uji klinis
– Perlakuan terhadap hewan penelitian
– Keamanan hayati (biosecurity)
– Panduan baku pelaporan hasil penelitian(reporting guideline)
Etika Penelitian
![Page 67: Etika Publikasi Ilmiah dan Research Misconduct](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012610/619d18396f32b032524d1052/html5/thumbnails/67.jpg)
• Kekokohan dan keandalan hasil penelitian• Kejujuran• Keseimbangan• Originalitas (keaslian) penelitian• Transparansi• Kepengarangan dan pengakuan• Akuntabilitas dan tanggung jawab• Kepatuhan pada ulasan sejawat dan kesepakatan
publikasi• Melaporkan penelitian secara bertanggungjawab ketika
melibatkan manusia atau hewan.
Etika publikasi (dari sisi penulis)
![Page 68: Etika Publikasi Ilmiah dan Research Misconduct](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012610/619d18396f32b032524d1052/html5/thumbnails/68.jpg)
68
1. Tuduhan Pelanggaran2. Kepengarangan dan kontribusi3. Keluhan dan Banding4. Benturan/persaingan Kepentingan5. Data dan Reproduksibilitas6. Pengawasan Etis7. Hak milik intelektual8. Pengelolaan jurnal9. Proses ulasan sejawat10. Diskusi dan Koreksi Pasca-publikasi
(https://publicationethics.org)
Etika publikasi (editor/penerbit): COPE’s Core Practices
![Page 69: Etika Publikasi Ilmiah dan Research Misconduct](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012610/619d18396f32b032524d1052/html5/thumbnails/69.jpg)
COPE’s Core Practices
69
1. Tuduhan Pelanggaran
(https://publicationethics.org)
Jurnal harus memiliki proses yang dijabarkan dengan jelas untuk menangani dugaan(tuduhan) adanya pelanggaran, terlepas dari bagaimana dugaan/tuduhan tersebutdimunculkan
Jurnal harus menanggapi dengan serius dugaan pelanggaran pra-publikasi dan pasca-publikasi.
Kebijakan harus mencakup cara menangani tuduhan dari pelapor.
![Page 70: Etika Publikasi Ilmiah dan Research Misconduct](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012610/619d18396f32b032524d1052/html5/thumbnails/70.jpg)
COPE’s Core Practices
70
2. Kepengarangan dan kontribusi
(https://publicationethics.org)
Jurnal harus memiliki kebijakan yang jelas perihal persyaratan menjadi penulis dan kontributor. Kebijakan tersebut harus memungkinkan terjadinya transparansi tentangbentuk kontribusi dan seberapa besar kontribusi dari tiap penulis.
Jurnal wajib merancang proses untuk mengelola sengketa yang mungkin terjadi.
![Page 71: Etika Publikasi Ilmiah dan Research Misconduct](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012610/619d18396f32b032524d1052/html5/thumbnails/71.jpg)
COPE’s Core Practices
71
3. Keluhan dan Banding
(https://publicationethics.org)
Jurnal harus memiliki proses yang dijabarkan dengan jelas dalammenangani keluhan terhadap jurnal, staf penerbitan, dewan editor, atau penerbit.
![Page 72: Etika Publikasi Ilmiah dan Research Misconduct](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012610/619d18396f32b032524d1052/html5/thumbnails/72.jpg)
COPE’s Core Practices
72
4. Benturan/persaingan Kepentingan
(https://publicationethics.org)
Jurnal harus memberikan penjabaran yang jelas tentang definisi dan proses yang akan dilakukan untuk menangani terjadinya benturan (konflik) kepentingan antarakepentingan antara penulis, mitra bebestari, editor, dan penerbit.
Proses penanganan yang dijabarkan harus meliputi tahapan sebelum atau sesudah publikasi.
![Page 73: Etika Publikasi Ilmiah dan Research Misconduct](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012610/619d18396f32b032524d1052/html5/thumbnails/73.jpg)
COPE’s Core Practices
73
5. Data dan reproduksi hasil penelitian
(https://publicationethics.org)
Jurnal harus menyusun dan menjabarkan kebijakan tentang ketersediaan data,mendorong penggunaan pedoman pelaporan (reporting guideline), dan pendaftaranuji klinis maupun rancangan penelitian lain sesuai dengan standar pada tiap disiplinilmu.
![Page 74: Etika Publikasi Ilmiah dan Research Misconduct](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012610/619d18396f32b032524d1052/html5/thumbnails/74.jpg)
COPE’s Core Practices
74
6. Pengawasan Etis
(https://publicationethics.org)
Pengawasan etis meliputi hal-hal yang terkait namun tidak terbatas pada kebijakantentang persetujuan penulis untuk menerbitkan artikel, publikasi tentang populasiyang rentan, perilaku etis dalam penelitian menggunakan hewan, perilaku etis dalampenelitian menggunakan subjek manusia, penanganan terhadap data dan praktikbisnis/pemasaran yang bersifat rahasia.
![Page 75: Etika Publikasi Ilmiah dan Research Misconduct](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012610/619d18396f32b032524d1052/html5/thumbnails/75.jpg)
COPE’s Core Practices
75
7. Hak milik intelektual
(https://publicationethics.org)
Semua kebijakan tentang kekayaan intelektual, termasuk hak cipta dan lisensipenerbitan, harus dijabarkan dengan jelas.
Sebagai tambahan, biaya apa pun yang terkait dengan penerbitan harus jelas bagipara penulis dan pembaca.
Jurnal wajib memiliki kebijakan yang jelas tentang apa yang dianggap sebagai prapublikasi sehingga tidak dapat diterbitkan.
Jurnal harus memberikan arahan dan rincian tentang apa yang disebut sebagaiplagiarisme, publikasi yang berlebihan/tumpang tindih.
![Page 76: Etika Publikasi Ilmiah dan Research Misconduct](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012610/619d18396f32b032524d1052/html5/thumbnails/76.jpg)
COPE’s Core Practices
76
8. Pengelolaan jurnal
(https://publicationethics.org)
Jurnal perlu merancang dan membangun infrastruktur yang dijabarkan dandilaksanakan secara baik terkait pengelolaan jurnal.
Hal ini meliputi model bisnis, kebijakan, proses dan perangkat lunakuntuk menjalankan proses editorial jurnal secara independen, termasuk pengelolaansecara efisien dan pemberian pelatihan kepada dewan editor serta staf publikasi.
![Page 77: Etika Publikasi Ilmiah dan Research Misconduct](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012610/619d18396f32b032524d1052/html5/thumbnails/77.jpg)
COPE’s Core Practices
77
9. Proses Ulasan Sejawat
(https://publicationethics.org)
Seluruh proses ulasan sejawat harus dijelaskan secara transparandan dikelola dengan baik.
Jurnal harus menyediakan pelatihan untuk editor dan mitra bebestasi dan memiliki kebijakan tentang beragam aspek ulasan sejawat, khususnya terkait pemilihan danpenetapan model/prosedur pemberian ulasan dan proses untuk menangani benturankepentingan, proses banding, dan penanganan perselisihan yang mungkin timbul selama proses ulasan sejawat.
![Page 78: Etika Publikasi Ilmiah dan Research Misconduct](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012610/619d18396f32b032524d1052/html5/thumbnails/78.jpg)
COPE’s Core Practices
78
10. Diskusi dan Koreksi Pasca-publikasi
(https://publicationethics.org)
Jurnal wajib mengizinkan terjadinya diskusi dan perdebatan pasca-publikasi, baik pada situs jurnal mereka, melalui pengiriman surat (Email) kepada editor, atau padasitus yang dikelola pihak eksternal, misalnya PubMed Commons atau PubPeer.
Jurnal wajib memiliki mekanisme untuk mengoreksi, merevisi atau mencabut artikelsetelah pasca-publikasi, apabila memang terbukti ada kesalahan atau pelanggaranyang terjadi.
![Page 79: Etika Publikasi Ilmiah dan Research Misconduct](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012610/619d18396f32b032524d1052/html5/thumbnails/79.jpg)
Prinsip transparansi dalam pengelolaan jurnal
1. Website 2. Nama Jurnal3. Proses Peer Review4. Kepemilikan dan Manajemen5. Struktur Organisasi6. Informasi tentang tim
Editor/Kontak7. Hak Cipta dan Perizinan8. Biaya Penulis9. Dugaan Pelanggaran Akademik10. Etika Publikasi
11. Jadwal Penerbitan12. Akses13. Perarsipan 14. Sumber Pendapatan15. Periklanan16. Pemasaran Langsung
![Page 80: Etika Publikasi Ilmiah dan Research Misconduct](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012610/619d18396f32b032524d1052/html5/thumbnails/80.jpg)
Taksonomi Kasus dari COPE
1. Hal Kepengarangan2. Benturan Kepentingan3. Persetujuan Untuk Publikasi4. Kontributor5. Hak Cipta6. Koreksi Sastra7. Data8. Kemandirian Editor9. Pendanaan/Sponsor10. Metrik11. Lain-Lain12. Pelanggaran/Perilaku Yang
Dipertanyakan
13. Kesalahan14. Ulasan sejawat15. Plagiarisme16. Penelitian Yang
dipertanyakan/Tidak Etis17. Publikasi yang
Berlebihan/Duplikasi18. Pelapor pelanggaran
(Whistleblowers)
![Page 81: Etika Publikasi Ilmiah dan Research Misconduct](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012610/619d18396f32b032524d1052/html5/thumbnails/81.jpg)
Contoh pelanggaran
Kasus 01. Ada artikel yang memiliki kemiripan dengan banyak sumber.
Kasus 02. Ada artikel yang memiliki kemiripan tinggi dengan satu-duaartikel lain.
Kasus 03. Ada artikel yang tergolong self-plagiarism
Kasus 04. Artikel dalam versi sama (published/final version) tersimpan disejumlah website berbeda.
Kasus 05. Penerbit jurnal tergolong meragukan
Kasus 06. Ada temuan (hasil penelitian) yang tergolong mencurigakan. – Koefisien korelasi yang terlalu besar
Kasus 07. Rekayasa sumber acuan– Informasi yang diambil tergolong informasi umum atau setidaknya
pengetahuan umum pada bidang ilmu terkait.– Sumber acuan digunakan secara berturut-turut untuk satu informasi
tunggal.