Transcript
Page 1: Experiment Design 5: Variables & Levels

Experiment Design 5:Experiment Design 5:Variables & LevelsVariables & Levels

Martin, Ch 8, 9,10

Page 2: Experiment Design 5: Variables & Levels

Recap

Different kinds of variables– Independent, dependent, confounding, control, and

random Different kinds of validity

– Internal, construct, statistical, external– Each associated with a question

Randomization– Random sampling: generalization– Random assignment: causation

Page 3: Experiment Design 5: Variables & Levels

Picking a design

Choosing how to assign participants to levels of an independent variable– Between vs. within

Choosing how many levels of an independent variable

Choosing how many independent variables

Page 4: Experiment Design 5: Variables & Levels

Between vs. Within designs

Condition 1:– Fred

– Ginger

– Mary Condition 2:

– Ed

– Mabel

– George

Condition 1:– Fred

– Ginger

– Mary Condition 2:

– Fred

– Ginger

– Mary

5

8

6

6

9

7

5

8

6

6

9

7

Page 5: Experiment Design 5: Variables & Levels

Within vs. Between Subjects

Cost– Between: More participants– Within: More time per participant

Confounding variables– Between: Group differences possible

• Use randomization, many subjects, matching

– Within: Order effects possible• Use counterbalancing

Page 6: Experiment Design 5: Variables & Levels

Transfer effects (order effects) Definition:

– When taking part in earlier trials changes performance in the later trials

Types– Learning– Fatigue– Range or context effect

Problem:– Makes within-subjects designs difficult to

interpret

Page 7: Experiment Design 5: Variables & Levels

Counterbalancing

Adjust condition order to unconfound transfer effects with condition effects– A,B,C– A,C,B– B,A,C– B,C,A– C,A,B– C,B,A

Page 8: Experiment Design 5: Variables & Levels

Counter-balancing either within- or between- subjects

Between:– Joe: A,B– Mary: B,A

Within:– Joe: ABBA– Mary: ABBA

Page 9: Experiment Design 5: Variables & Levels

Things to worry about in counter-balancing

If within-subjects counter-balancing:– Linear transfer effects?

• Is the transfer from the 1st position to the 2nd position the same as the transfer from 2nd to 3rd position?

– E.g., sometimes most learning happens in 1st trials

Always worry about asymmetrical transfer– Does A influence B more than B influences A?

Page 10: Experiment Design 5: Variables & Levels

Asymmetrical transfer

Time 1 Time 2

% trigrams remembered

Noisy

Quiet

Effect of noise depends on order People stick with the strategy they pick first

– Or mix strategies

Quiet

Noisy

Page 11: Experiment Design 5: Variables & Levels

Partial counterbalancing: Latin Square

Every condition appears in every position equally:– Joe: A B C– Mary: C A B– John: B C A

Page 12: Experiment Design 5: Variables & Levels

Matching Try to reduce between-group differences E.g., rank hearing as Good, Fair, Poor Unmatched, could get

– Noisy: Poor1, Poor2, Fair1– Quiet: Good1, Good2, Fair2

Matched, get:– Noisy: Poor1, Fair2, Good1– Quiet: Poor2, Fair1, Good2

Page 13: Experiment Design 5: Variables & Levels

Matching

Match variable(s) and DV’s should be strongly correlated

Caveat: Match test should not affect DV– e.g., use existing match variable (SAT-M)

Note: Within-subjects designs “match” automatically

Page 14: Experiment Design 5: Variables & Levels

Number of levels

How many different groups or conditions that change just one independent variable– Two:

• Experimental vs. control

• Massed vs. Distributed practice

– More:• Drug vs. Placebo vs. No pill

• # of times an item is studied: 1,2,4,8, or 16 times

Page 15: Experiment Design 5: Variables & Levels

Inter- and extra-polating

0204060

0 1 2 3 4# study repetitions

0

50

100

0 1 2 3 4# study repetitions

0204060

0 1 2 3 4# study repetitions

? ?

inside outside

Page 16: Experiment Design 5: Variables & Levels

Floor & Ceiling Effects

0

20

40

60

80

100

2 times 4 times

# of study repetitions

0

20

40

60

80

100

2 times 4 times

# of study repetitions

Page 17: Experiment Design 5: Variables & Levels

Single Variable vs.Multiple Variables

Single Variable:– Only one independent variable– Cannot look at interactions

Multiple Variables:– Two or more independent variables– If use factorial design, can look at interactions– Can require a lot of participants (between) or

time (within)

Page 18: Experiment Design 5: Variables & Levels

Interactions

Author Editor

% errorsdetected

100

0

Proofreader

Who finds more errors, author or editor? How to spot the interaction graphically?

PrepLevel Manuscript Draft

Page 19: Experiment Design 5: Variables & Levels

Interactions

Two independent variables interact when the effect of one depends on the level of the other

Independent vs. Control vs. Random– What if PrepLevel had been a control variable?– What if PrepLevel had been a random variable?– Make it an independent variable if there is

reason to believe its effect might depend

Page 20: Experiment Design 5: Variables & Levels

Factorial design Do all combinations of factors (cells)

– E.g., Language learning

German Male FemaleOldYoung

French Male FemaleOldYoung

A factor can be within or between

Page 21: Experiment Design 5: Variables & Levels

Converging Operations(≠converging series)

Using more than one method to test the same hypothesis– E.g., using experimental and observational

methods– E.g., using cross-sectional and longitudinal

designs

Page 22: Experiment Design 5: Variables & Levels

Baseline procedure

Example 1: Clinical– No drug, drug, no drug, drug,...

Example 2: Education– Regular class, new format, regular

class, new format,..


Top Related