Faculty Climate SurveyCollege of Engineering
2012-13
Task Force Members• Mickey Abel, College of Visual Arts & Design
• Christy Crutsinger, Provost Office, Chair
• Tracy Everbach, Frank W. and Sue Mayborn School of Journalism
• Francisco Guzman, College of Business
• Warren Henry, College of Music
• Kuruvilla John, College of Engineering
• Linda Marshall, College of Arts & Sciences
• Mariela Nunez-Janes, College of Public Affairs and Community Service
• Mike Sayler, College of Education
• Sanjukta Pookulangara, College of Merchandising, Hospitality, and Tourism
• Mark Vosvick, Faculty Senate
• Angela Wilson, College of Arts & Sciences
• Jerry Wircenski, College of Information
• The Survey Research Institute at Cornell University was contracted to administer the online survey.
• Survey was open between November 8, 2012 - January 25, 2013.
• Initial email invitation and three reminders were sent to participants.
• Incentives were offered to full-time faculty members in departments achieving 80% response rate.
Methodology
• For departments achieving an 80% response rate by December 14th, the names of full-time faculty were entered into a drawing to win $250.00 to apply toward faculty travel or other professional development activities.
• A total of 700 participants completed the survey out of 1059 with valid email addresses, achieving a 66.10% response rate. The response rate of 51.16% was achieved by the College of Engineering.
• Differences between UNT and the College of Engineering were determined through independent t-tests.
Methodology
5
• Hiring• Teaching • Research• Service • Merit• Promotion• Workload
• Resources• Mentoring• Work/Family Balance• Diversity• Satisfaction• Climate
Survey Instrument
2012-13 Climate Survey, College of Engineering
6
Response Rate by College
CPAC8% n = 59
CMHT4% n = 26
CVAD6% n = 45
CAS43% n = 324
COB9% n = 69
COE10% n = 76
COM9% n = 67
CENG6% n = 48
COI3% n = 26
SOJ2% n = 15
Response Rate by College
CPACCMHTCVADCASCOBCOECOMCENGCOISOJ
Other = 0.6 % n = 5; represents Graduate School and Undergradu-ate Studies
2012-13 Climate Survey, College of Engineering
7
How satisfied were you with the following hiring factors? (Mean)
Survey Items UNT
CENG
Faculty efforts to meet and recruit you to UNT 3.34 3.17*
The overall hiring process
3.22
3.40
The quality of information about responsibilities associated with the position
3.15
3.15
Your initial salary
2.73 2.91
Your start-up package
2.67 2.98*
Negotiations about your salary and start-up package
2.65 2.90
Range: ( 1= Strongly disagree, 4 = Strongly agree) * significant at .05 level
Hiring
2012-13 Climate Survey, College of Engineering
8
How satisfied were you with the following hiring factors?(Frequency Distribution)
Survey Items Very dissatisfied Dissatisfied Satisfied Very Satisfied CENG N/%
Faculty efforts to meet and recruit you to UNT
2 4.3%
2 4.3%
28 60.9%
14 30.4%
46 100%
The overall hiring process
1 2.1%
0 0.0%
25 53.2%
21 44.7%
47 100%
The quality of information about responsibilities associated with the position
1 2.2%
5 10.9%
26 56.5%
14 30.4%
46 100%
Your initial salary
3 6.5%
7 28.0%
27 58.7%
9 19.6%
46 100%
Your start-up package
1 2.5%
9 22.5%
20 50.0%
10 25.0%
40 100%
Negotiations about your salary and start-up package
5 12.5%
2 5.0%
25 62.5%
8 20.0%
40 100%
Hiring
2012-13 Climate Survey, College of Engineering
9
Hiring in my department… UNT CENG
is conducted fairly
3.19 3.40
includes a conscious effort to generate a diverse pool of applicants
3.05 3.26
has established and clearly communicated criteria 3.19 3.24
is consistent for all applicants for a position 3.12 3.31
Range: (1=Strongly disagree, 4 = Strongly agree)
Hiring Please rate your level of agreement about how faculty hiring is done in your department. (Mean)
2012-13 Climate Survey, College of Engineering
10
Please rate your level of agreement about how faculty hiring is done in your department. (Frequency Distribution)
Survey Items Strongly Disagree Disagree Agree Strongly Agree CENG N/%
is conducted fairly 2 4.4%
2 4.4%
17 37.8%
24 53.3%
45 100%
Includes a conscious effort to generate a diverse pool of applicants
1 2.3%
5 11.6%
19 44.2%
18 41.9%
43 100%
Has established and clearly communicated criteria
1 2.2%
7 15.6%
17 37.8%
20 44.4%
45 100%
Is consistent for all applicants for a position
1 2.4%
6 14.3%
14 33.3%
21 50.0%
42 100%
Hiring
2012-13 Climate Survey, College of Engineering
11
ITEM UNT CENG My colleagues and I have informal conversations about teaching. 3.40 3.28
Development and improvement in teaching skills is valued. 3.04 3.02
Classes are assigned fairly. 3.08 3.23
Teaching load is fair. 3.08 3.17
Work with faculty-led study abroad programs is valued. 2.83 2.96
Community-based learning projects are valued. 2.71 2.73
Mentoring undergraduate students is valued. 2.89 3.00
Mentoring graduate students is valued. 3.24 3.28
Mentoring underrepresented students is valued. 2.87 2.95
I spend more time talking to and informally mentoring students than do others in my department.
2.87 2.94
Undergraduate students treat me appropriately. 3.31 3.42
Graduate students treat me appropriately. 3.41 3.48 Range: ( 1= Strongly disagree, 4 = Strongly agree)
Teaching Please rate your level of agreement with each of the following statements about teaching in your department.(Mean)
2012-13 Climate Survey, College of Engineering
12
ITEM Strongly disagree
Disagree Agree Strongly agree
CENG N/%
My colleagues and I have informal conversations about teaching. 1
2.1%
5
10.6%
21
44.7%
20
42.6%
47
100%
Development and improvement in teaching skills is valued. 2
4.3%
12
25.5%
16
34.0%
17
36.2%
47
100%
Classes are assigned fairly. 1
2.1%
6
12.8%
21
44.7%
19
40.4%
47
100%
Teaching load is fair. 1
2.1%
7
14.9%
22
46.8%
17
36.2%
47
100%
Work with faculty-led study abroad programs is valued. 2
7.4%
6
22.2%
10
37.0%
9
33.3%
27
100.0%
Community-based learning projects are valued. 4
13.3%
7
23.3%
12
40.0%
7
23.3%
30
100%
Mentoring undergraduate students is valued. 2
4.3%
10
21.3%
21
44.7%
14
29.8%
47
100%
Mentoring graduate students is valued. 2
4.3%
4
8.7%
19
41.3%
21
45.7%
46
100%
Mentoring underrepresented students is valued. 3
7.5%
9
22.5%
15
37.5%
13
32.5%
40
100%
I spend more time talking to and informally mentoring students than do others in my department.
1
3.0%
10
30.3%
12
36.4%
10
30.3%
33
100%
Undergraduate students treat me appropriately. 0
0.0%
1
2.2%
24
53.3%
20
44.4%
45
100%
Graduate students treat me appropriately. 0
0.0%
1
2.2%
22
47.8%
23
50.0%
46
100%
Teaching Please rate your level of agreement with each of the following statements about teaching in your department.(Frequency Distribution)
ResearchThink about the value of your own creativity/scholarship/research in your department. In comparison to your colleagues: How much does your department value your scholarship/research? (Mean)
UNT CENG1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
3.293.53
Range: (1 = Undervalued; 5 = Very highly valued)Und
erva
lued
----
----
----
----
----
--V
ery
Hig
hly
Val
ued
ResearchThink about the value of your own creativity/scholarship/research in your department. In comparison to your colleagues: How much does your department value your scholarship/research? (Frequency Distribution)
Undervalued Somewhat undervalued
Valued equally
Somewhat valued
Very highly valued
CENGN/%
37.5%
615.0%
1332.5%
37.5%
1537.5%
40100%
15
ITEM UNT CENG
Interdisciplinary creatively/scholarship/research is valued in my department.
2.92 3.05
Interdisciplinary creatively/scholarship/research is rewarded in my department.
2.65 2.94
UNT provides the needed infrastructure for interdisciplinary work.
2.39 2.58
I sometimes collaborate with members of my department.
3.04 3.30*
My collaborations with people outside my department of the university are usually better than collaborations with department colleagues.
2.74 2.66
When people in the department are working on something related to my expertise, they ask for my input.
2.74 3.00
I find my research collaborations rewarding. 3.31 3.40
Range: ( 1= Strongly disagree, 4 = Strongly agree) * significant at .05 level
Research How much do you agree with each of these statements? (Mean)
2012-13 Climate Survey, College of Engineering
16
ITEM Strongly disagree
Disagree Agree Strongly agree
CENG N/%
Interdisciplinary creatively/scholarship/research is valued in my department.
3 7.5%
4 10.0%
21 52.5%
12 30.0%
40 100%
Interdisciplinary creatively/scholarship/research is rewarded in my department.
2 6.1%
6 18.2%
17 51.5%
8 24.2%
33 100%
UNT provides the needed infrastructure for interdisciplinary work.
5 13.2%
11 28.9%
17 44.7%
5 13.2%
38 100%
I sometimes collaborate with members of my department.
0 0.0%
3 7.5%
22 55.0%
15 37.5%
40 100%
My collaborations with people outside my department of the university are usually better than collaborations with department colleagues.
1 2.9%
15 42.9%
14 40.0%
5 14.3%
35 100%
When people in the department are working on something related to my expertise, they ask for my input.
1 2.9%
8 22.9%
16 45.7%
10 28.6%
35 100%
I find my research collaborations rewarding. 1 2.5%
0 0.0%
21 52.5%
18 45.0%
40 100%
Research How much do you agree with each of these statements? (Frequency Distribution)
2012-13 Climate Survey, College of Engineering
17
Service In my department, committee assignments are made fairly.(Mean)
CENG
UNT
1 2 3 4 5
3.96**
3.49
Mean
Range: (1 = Strongly disagree, 5 = Strongly agree) ** significant at .01 level
2012-13 Climate Survey, College of Engineering
18
Service In my department, committee assignments are made fairly. (Frequency Distribution)
Strongly disagree
Disagree Neither Agree or disagree
Agree Strongly agree
CENGN/%
00.0%
36.5%
1021.7%
1941.3%
1430.4%
46100%
2012-13 Climate Survey, College of Engineering
19
ServiceThink about all of the service activities you actually do (100% of your service), including formal and recognized activities as well as informal activities. How much of your service is… (Mean)
ITEM UNT CENG
Not talked about/kept from my colleagues 3.50 1.91
Rewarded 2.17 2.23
Recognized by the chair and/or colleagues 2.62 2.84*
Required 2.49 2.75*
Range: ( 1 = None of it, 4 = All of it ) *significant at the .05 level
2012-13 Climate Survey, College of Engineering
20
ServiceThink about all of the service activities you actually do (100% of your service), including formal and recognized activities as well as informal activities. How much of your service is…(Frequency Distribution)
ITEM None of it Some of it Most of it All of it CENGN/%
Not talked about/kept from my colleagues 1329.5%
2352.3%
715.9%
12.3%
44100%
Rewarded 818.2%
2147.7%
1227.3%
36.8%
44100%
Recognized by the chair and/or colleagues 12.3%
1431.8%
2045.5%
920.5%
44100%
Required 24.5%
1636.4%
1738.6%
920.5%
44100%
2012-13 Climate Survey, College of Engineering
21
Merit Think about the feedback you receive from your Department Chair for your merit reviews. Is the evaluation you receive…(Mean)
ITEM UNT CENG
Helpful 3.60 3.94
Clear 3.83 4.06
Accurate 3.78 4.06
Constructive 3.73 4.00
Range: (1 = Never, 5 = Always)
2012-13 Climate Survey, College of Engineering
22
Merit Think about the feedback you receive from your Department Chair for your merit reviews. Is the evaluation you receive…(Frequency Distribution)
ITEM Never Almost never Sometimes Almost always Always CENGN/%
Helpful 13.0%
00.0%
1030.3%
1133.3%
1133.3%
33100%
Clear 00.0%
26.1%
618.2%
1339.4%
1236.4%
33100%
Accurate 00.0%
13.0%
721.2%
1442.4%
1133.3%
33100%
Constructive 00.0%
39.1%
515.2%
1442.4%
1133.3%
33100%
2012-13 Climate Survey, College of Engineering
23
Merit Think about the feedback you receive from your PAC for your merit reviews. Is the evaluation you receive…(Mean)
ITEM UNT CENG
Helpful 3.43 3.67
Clear 3.66 3.71
Accurate 3.62 3.67
Constructive 3.50 3.71
Range: (1 = Never, 5 = Always)
2012-13 Climate Survey, College of Engineering
24
Merit Think about the feedback you receive from your PAC for your merit reviews. Is the evaluation you receive…(Frequency Distribution)
ITEM Never Almost never
Sometimes Almost always
Always CENGN/%
Helpful 28.3%
14.2%
729.2%
729.2%
729.2%
24100%
Clear 28.3%
14.2%
625.0%
833.3%
729.2%
24100%
Accurate 28.3%
14.2%
625.0%
937.5%
625.0%
24100%
Constructive
2012-13 Climate Survey, College of Engineering
25
Promotion
Range: (1 = Not at all important, 4 = Very important) * significant at .05 level
How important is/was it to you to achieve the rank of full professor? (Full professors only respondents) (Mean)
3.45
3.5
3.55
3.6
3.65
3.7
3.75
3.8
3.85
3.9
3.60
3.87*
UNTCENG
2012-13 Climate Survey, College of Engineering
26
PromotionHow important is/was it to you to achieve the rank of full professor? (Full professors only respondents) (Frequency Distribution)
Not at all important
Somewhat unimportant
Somewhat important
Very important
CENGN/%
00.0%
00.0%
513.2%
3386.8%
38100%
2012-13 Climate Survey, College of Engineering
27
PromotionHow much did the following factors affect your decision to apply for promotion to full professor at UNT? (Rank of Full Professor but not hired as Full Professor) (Mean)
ITEM UNT CENG
I believed I was ready. 3.82 3.71
A colleague thought I should. 2.82 2.86
My chair thought I should. 2.88 2.29
My dean thought I should. 2.43 2.57
One of more people did not think I should. 1.42 1.86
No one ever talked to me about it. 1.45 1.71
I needed to make a better salary. 2.50 1.86
Range: (1 = None, 4 = A lot)
2012-13 Climate Survey, College of Engineering
28
PromotionHow much did the following factors affect your decision to apply for promotion to full professor at UNT? (Rank of Full Professor but not hired as Full Professor)(Frequency Distribution)
ITEM None Little Some A lot CENGN/%
I believed I was ready. 0
0.0%
1
14.3%
0
0.0%
6
85.7%
7
100%
A colleague thought I should.
2
28.6%
0
0.0%
2
28.6%
3
42.9%
7
100%My chair thought I should.
3
42.9%
1
14.3%
1
14.3%
2
28.6%
7
100%
My dean thought I should.
2
28.6%
2
28.6%
0
0.0%
3
42.9%
7
100%
One of more people did not think I should.
4
57.1%
1
14.3%
1
14.3%
1
14.3%
7
100%
No one ever talked to me about it.
5
71.4%
0
0.0%
1
14.3%
1
14.3%
7
100.0%
I needed to make a better salary.
3
42.9%
2
28.6%
2
28.6%
0
0.0%
7
100%
29
PromotionITEM UNT CENG
Members of my department give me helpful advice. 3.15 3.40
The tenure and promotion requirements are very clear. 2.75 2.91
The tenure and promotion process is fair and consistent.
2.80 2.67
It is difficult to know exactly what I should be doing to be promoted.
2.42 2.27
I am reluctant to talk about controversial issues because it might affect my promotion.
3.04 2.91
I am comfortable asking about performance expectations.
3.09 3.00
I feel like I have control over whether I will be promoted.
2.67 3.00
Good mentoring is critical to my being promoted. 3.19 3.55
Range (1= Strongly disagree, 4 = Strongly agree)
Please address the following issues about tenure and promotion to Associate Professor. (Assistant Professor respondents only) (Mean)
2012-13 Climate Survey, College of Engineering
30
PromotionITEM Strongly
disagreeDisagree Agree Strongly
agreeCENGN/%
Members of my department give me helpful advice. 00.0%
00.0%
660.0%
440.0%
10100%
The tenure and promotion requirements are very clear. 00.0%
436.4%
436.4%
327.3%
11100.0%
The tenure and promotion process is fair and consistent.
116.7%
233.3%
116.7%
233.3%
6100.0%
It is difficult to know exactly what I should be doing to be promoted.
218.2%
436.4%
545.5%
00.0%
11100%
I am reluctant to talk about controversial issues because it might affect my promotion.
00.0%
327.3%
654.5%
218.2%
11100%
I am comfortable asking about performance expectations.
19.1%
218.%
436.4%
436.4%
11100%
I feel like I have control over whether I will be promoted.
00.0%
220.0%
660.0%
220.0%
10100%
Good mentoring is critical to my being promoted. 00.0%
00.0%
545.5%
654.5%
11100.0%
Please address the following issues about tenure and promotion to Associate Professor. (Assistant Professor respondents only) (Frequency Distribution)
2012-13 Climate Survey, College of Engineering
31
PromotionITEM UNT CENG
Members of my department give me helpful advice. 2.57 2.73
The tenure and promotion requirements are very clear. 2.33 2.36
The tenure and promotion process is fair and consistent. 2.41 2.50
It is difficult to know exactly what I should be doing to be promoted. 2.57 2.62
I am reluctant to talk about controversial issues because it might affect my promotion. 2.39 2.33
I am comfortable asking about performance expectations. 2.86 2.94
I feel like I have control over whether I will be promoted. 2.32 2.40
Good mentoring is critical to my being promoted. 2.86 3.08
Range: ( 1 = Strongly disagree; 4 = Strongly agree)
Please address the following issues about tenure and promotion to Full Professor. (Associate Professor respondents only) (Mean)
2012-13 Climate Survey, College of Engineering
32
PromotionITEM Strongly
disagreeDisagree Agree Strongly
agreeCENGN/%
Members of my department give me helpful advice. 213.3%
320.0%
746.7%
320.0%
15100%
The tenure and promotion requirements are very clear. 321.4%
428.6%
642.9%
17.1%
14100%
The tenure and promotion process is fair and consistent. 325.0%
18.3%
758.3%
18.3%
12100%
It is difficult to know exactly what I should be doing to be promoted. 215.4%
323.1%
646.2%
215.4%
13100%
I am reluctant to talk about controversial issues because it might affect my promotion.
213.3%
640.0%
746.7%
00.0%
15100%
I am comfortable asking about performance expectations. 00.0%
212.5%
1381.2%
16.2%
16100%
I feel like I have control over whether I will be promoted. 426.7%
213.3%
853.3%
16.7%
15100%
Good mentoring is critical to my being promoted. 00.0%
17.7%
1076.9%
215.4%
13100%
Please address the following issues about tenure and promotion to Full Professor. (Associate Professor respondents only) (Frequency Distribution)
2012-13 Climate Survey, College of Engineering
33
Promotion
to Associate Professor to Full Professor1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
3.49
2.97
3.67
3.36
UNTCENG
Range: (1 = Very unlikely, 4 = Very likely)
How likely are you to be promoted?(Assistant and Associate Professor respondents only) (Mean)
2012-13 Climate Survey, College of Engineering
34
Promotion How likely are you to be promoted?(Assistant and Associate Professor respondents only)(Frequency Distribution)
Very unlikely Unlikely Likely Very likely CENGN/%
Associate Professor
Full Professor
Associate Professor
Full Professor
Associate Professor
Full Professor
Associate Professor
Full Professor
Associate Professor
Full Professor
00.0%
19.1%
00.0%
00.0%
133.3%
436.4%
266.7%
654.5%
3100%
11100%
2012-13 Climate Survey, College of Engineering
35
WorkloadPlease choose the proportion of time you spent during the 2011-2012 academic year for each of the following. For new faculty, choose the proportion of time you spent working during the fall semester. (Mean)
ITEM UNT CENG
Preparing to teach assigned courses, labs, etc. 3.49 3.50
Teaching the assigned courses, labs, studies and communicating with those students 3.50 3.49
Teaching or mentoring students in any type of independent study, master theses or dissertations 3.39 3.51
Formally advising students 3.27 3.51
Advising or mentoring “extra” students who seek you out, not those assigned to you 3.62 3.64
Conducting your scholarly activities (i.e., research, composing, etc.) 3.29 3.59
Writing proposals (e.g., grants) to conduct your research/scholarship/creative activities 2.83 3.62**
Providing peer reviewing (i.e., reviewing the scholarly or creative work of others) 3.05 3.33
External paid consulting 2.02 2.10
Mentoring other faculty 2.77 2.65
Committee, administrative, or governance work inside your department 3.30 3.13
Committee work at the college or university level 2.92 2.95
Outreach or community service 3.00 2.97
Advising or working with student organizations 2.71 3.06
Range: (1 = much less than other people 5 = Much more than other people) * *significant at .01 level
2012-13 Climate Survey, College of Engineering
36
WorkloadPlease choose the proportion of time you spent during the 2011-2012 academic year for each of the following. For new faculty, choose the proportion of time you spent working during the fall semester… (than other people) (Frequency Distribution)
ITEM Much less
Somewhat less
About the
same
Somewhat more
Much more
CENG
N/%
Preparing to teach assigned courses, labs, etc. 0
0.0%
0
0.0%
24
60.0%
12
30.0%
4
10.0%
40
100%
Teaching the assigned courses, labs, studies and communicating with those students 0
0.0%
0
0.0%
24
61.5%
11
28.2%
4
10.3%
39
100%
Teaching or mentoring students in any type of independent study, master theses or dissertations
0
0.0%
2
5.1%
19
48.7%
14
35.9%
4
10.3%
39
100%
Formally advising students 1
2.6%
3
7.7%
18
46.2%
9
23.1%
8
20.5%
39
100%
Advising or mentoring “extra” students who seek you out, not those assigned to you 0
0.0%
2
5.6%
17
47.2%
9
25.0%
8
22.2%
36
100.0%
Conducting your scholarly activities (i.e., research, composing, etc.) 1
2.6%
3
7.7%
15
38.5%
12
30.8%
8
20.5%
39
100%
2012-13 Climate Survey, College of Engineering
37
WorkloadPlease choose the proportion of time you spent during the 2011-2012 academic year for each of the following. For new faculty, choose the proportion of time you spent working during the fall semester… (than other people) (Frequency Distribution)
ITEM Much less Somewhat less About the same Somewhat more
Much more CENG
N/%Writing proposals (e.g., grants) to conduct your research/scholarship/creative activities
2
5.1%
1
2.6%
15
38.5%
13
33.3%
8
20.5%
39
100%
Providing peer reviewing (i.e., reviewing the scholarly or creative work of others)
1
2.6%
7
17.9%
16
41.0%
8
20.5%
7
17.9%
39
100%
External paid consulting
13
44.8%
7
24.1%
3
10.3%
5
17.2%
1
3.4%
29
100%
Mentoring other faculty
10
29.4%
4
11.8%
11
32.4%
6
17.6%
3
8.8%
34
100%
Committee, administrative, or governance work inside your department
6
15.8%
3
7.9%
16
42.1%
6
15.8%
7
18.4%
38
100%
2012-13 Climate Survey, College of Engineering
38
WorkloadPlease choose the proportion of time you spent during the 2011-2012 academic year for each of the following. For new faculty, choose the proportion of time you spent working during the fall semester… (than other people) (Frequency Distribution)
ITEM Much less Somewhat less About the same Somewhat more
Much more CENG
N/%Committee work at the college or university level
7
18.4%
3
7.9%
17
44.7%
7
18.4%
4
10.5%
38
100%
Outreach or community service
6
17.1%
4
11.4%
14
40.0%
7
20.0%
4
11.4%
35
100%
Advising or working with student organizations
5
14.7%
7
20.6%
9
26.5%
7
20.6%
6
17.6%
34
100%
2012-13 Climate Survey, College of Engineering
39
ResourcesITEM UNT CENG
Office space 2.99 2.95
Space for research, scholarly or creative activities 2.78 2.77
Travel funds 2.43 2.28
Course assignments 2.96 2.98
Clerical, technical, or administrative support 2.82 2.47**
Range: ( 1 = Strongly disagree; 4 = Strongly agree) ** significant at .01 level
How satisfied are you with the distribution of the following in your department? (Mean)
2012-13 Climate Survey, College of Engineering
40
ResourcesITEM Very
dissatisfiedDissatisfied Satisfied Very satisfied CENG
N/%
Office space 00.0%
920.9%
2762.8%
716.3%
43100%
Space for research, scholarly or creative activities 37.0%
716.3%
3069.8%
37.0%
43100%
Travel funds 49.3%
2353.5%
1637.2%
00.0%
43100%
Course assignments 00.0%
614.3%
3173.8%
511.9%
42100%
Clerical, technical, or administrative support 920.9%
920.9%
2148.8%
49.3%
43100%
How satisfied are you with the distribution of the following in your department? (Frequency Distribution)
2012-13 Climate Survey, College of Engineering
41
Mentoring How important is mentoring for each of the following areas? (Mean)
ITEM UNT CENG
To learn how things are done at UNT 3.19 3.02
To learn how to get along in your department or college
3.07 2.81*
To improve teaching or manage students 3.14 3.05
To improve research or scholarly/artistic activities
3.24 3.28
To move into leadership positions 2.95 3.09
Range: ( 1 = None, 4 = A great deal) * significant at .05 level
2012-13 Climate Survey, College of Engineering
42
Mentoring How important is mentoring for each of the following areas? (Frequency Distribution)
ITEM Not at all important
Less important Important Very important CENG
N/%
To learn how things are done at UNT
3
7.0%
5
11.6%
23
53.5%
12
27.9%
43
100%
To learn how to get along in your department or college
5
11.6%
5
11.6%
26
60.5%
7
16.3%
43
100%
To improve teaching or manage students 3
7.0%
3
7.0%
26
60.5%
11
25.6%
43
100%
To improve research or scholarly/artistic activities
2
4.7%
1
2.3%
23
53.5%
17
39.5%
43
100%
To move into leadership positions
2
4.7%
4
9.3%
25
58.1%
12
27.9%
43
100%
43
Work/Family Balance ITEM UNT CENG
Household responsibilities 2.75 2.77
Childcare 1.87 2.26*Caring for someone who is ill, disabled, aging or with special needs 1.78 1.77
Your health 2.40 2.42
Cost of living 2.70 2.67
Meeting work expectations 3.08 3.19
The way your personal life and work interfere with each other 2.79 2.67
Having a successful academic/artistic career 3.05 3.33*
Your salary 2.94 2.91
Faculty morale in your department 2.82 2.70
Subtle discrimination 2.14 2.07
Range: ( 1 = None, 4 = A great deal) * significant at .05 level
The following are possible sources of stress for faculty. Rate the amount of stress you feel about each one. (Mean)
2012-13 Climate Survey, College of Engineering
44
Work/Family Balance ITEM None Very little Some A great deal CENG
N/%
Household responsibilities 1
2.3%
11
25.6%
28
65.1%
3
7.0%
43
100%
Childcare 15
34.9%
10
23.3%
10
23.3%
8
18.6%
43
100%
Caring for someone who is ill, disabled, aging or with special needs
22
51.2%
11
25.6%
8
18.6%
2
4.7%
43
100%
Your health 7
16.3%
15
34.9%
17
39.5%
4
9.3%
43
100%
Cost of living 5
11.6%
10
23.3%
22
51.2%
6
14.0%
43
100%
Meeting work expectations 1
2.3%
6
14.0%
20
46.5%
16
37.2%
43
100%
The following are possible sources of stress for faculty. Rate the amount of stress you feel about each one. (Frequency Distribution)
45
Work/Family Balance ITEM None Very little Some A great deal CENG
N/%
The way your personal life and work interfere with each other
5
11.6%
11
25.6%
20
46.5%
7
16.3%
43
100%
Having a successful academic/artistic career
1
2.3%
5
11.6%
16
37.2%
21
48.8%
43
100%
Your salary 2
4.7%
10
23.3%
21
48.8%
10
23.3%
43
100%
Faculty morale in your department 8
18.6%
9
20.9%
14
32.6%
12
27.9%
43
100%
Subtle discrimination 16
37.2%
13
30.2%
9
20.9%
5
11.6%
43
100%
The following are possible sources of stress for faculty. Rate the amount of stress you feel about each one. (Frequency Distribution)
2012-13 Climate Survey,College of Engineering
Work/Family Balance
47
Work/Family Balance ITEM UNT CENG
Prospects for tenure1.83 2.02
Prospects for promotion 2.39 2.48
Leadership opportunities2.07 2.30
The amount of support in your work environment
2.56 2.72
Acceptance for people like you2.07 2.28
The racial, ethnic or cultural climate at UNT1.89 1.81
Opportunities to have a happy social life2.22 2.28
Time to do your research/scholarship/creative activities
3.01 3.09
Time to spend with students2.41 2.91**
Time to spend with your spouse or significant other
2.69 2.93
Time to spend with your children or other family members
2.54 2.74
Range: ( 1 = None, 4 = A great deal) * *significant at .01 level
The following are possible sources of stress for faculty. Rate the amount of stress you feel about each one. (Mean)
2012-13 Climate Survey, College of Engineering
48
Work/Family Balance ITEM None Very
littleSome A great
dealCENG
N/%
Prospects for tenure25
58.1%
3
7.0%
4
9.3%
11
25.6%
43
100%
Prospects for promotion 15
35.7%
4
9.5%
11
26.2%
12
28.6%
42
100%
Leadership opportunities13
30.2%
9
20.9%
16
37.2%
5
11.6%
43
100%
The amount of support in your work environment6
14.0%
10
23.3%
17
39.5%
10
23.3%
43
100%
Acceptance for people like you13
30.2%
10
23.3%
15
34.9%
5
11.6%
43
100%
The racial, ethnic or cultural climate at UNT22
51.2%
11
25.6%
6
14.0%
4
9.3%
43
100%
Opportunities to have a happy social life12
27.9%
12
27.9%
14
32.6%
5
11.6%
43
100%
Time to do your research/scholarship/creative activities3
7.0%
4
9.3%
22
51.2%
14
32.6%
43
100%
Time to spend with students2
4.7%
10
23.3%
21
48.8%
10
23.3%
43
100%
Time to spend with your spouse or significant other3
7.0%
9
20.9%
19
44.2%
12
27.9%
43
100%
Time to spend with your children or other family members6
14.0%
11
25.6%
14
32.6%
12
27.9%
43
100%
The following are possible sources of stress for faculty. Rate the amount of stress you feel about each one. (Frequency Distribution)
2012-13 Climate Survey, College of Engineering
49
Diversity ITEM UNT CENG
White3.66 3.58
Gay/lesbian3.09 2.79
Bisexual3.02 2.71
Transgendered2.74 2.52
African American3.21 3.28
Latino3.27 3.32
Native American3.21 3.31
Asian American (raised in the U.S.) 3.34 3.43
From an English speaking country3.50 3.50
Range: ( 1 = Very uncomfortable, 4 = Very comfortable)
Try not to think about a specific individual, just give your general sense of how comfortable a new faculty member would be in your department if she or he were… (Mean)
2012-13 Climate Survey, College of Engineering
50
Diversity ITEM Very
uncomfortableUncomfortable Comfortable Very comfortable CENG
N/%
White0
0.0%
1
2.6%
14
36.8%
23
60.5%
38
100%
Gay/lesbian4
13.8%
4
13.8%
15
51.7%
6
20.7%
29
100%
Bisexual4
14.3%
5
17.9%
14
50.0%
5
17.9%
28
100%
Transgendered4
13.8%
11
37.9%
9
31.0%
5
17.2%
29
100%
African American0
0.0%
3
8.3%
20
55.6%
13
36.1%
36
100%
Latino0
0.0%
2
5.4%
21
56.8%
14
37.8%
37
100%
Native American0
0.0%
3
8.3%
19
52.8%
14
38.9%
36
100%
Asian American (raised in the U.S.)
0
0.0%
1
2.7%
19
51.4%
17
45.9%
37
100%
From an English speaking country
0
0.0%
1
2.6%
17
44.7%
20
52.6%
38
100%
Try not to think about a specific individual, just give your general sense of how comfortable a new faculty member would be in your department if she or he were…(Frequency Distribution)
2012-13 Climate Survey, College of Engineering
51
Diversity ITEM UNT CENG
From an Asian country 3.24 3.39
From a western European country 3.43 3.43
From a central of eastern European country 3.33 3.38
From a Middle Eastern country 3.13 3.28
Differently abled (i.e. disabled) 3.14 3.27
Christian 3.38 3.43
Religious but not Christian 3.24 3.34
Agnostic or atheistic 3.25 3.31
Range: ( 1 = Very uncomfortable, 4 = Very comfortable)
Try not to think about a specific individual, just give your general sense of how comfortable a new faculty member would be in your department if she or he were…(Mean)
2012-13 Climate Survey, College of Engineering
52
Diversity ITEM Very
uncomfortableUncomfortable Comfortable Very comfortable CENG
N/%
From an Asian country
0
0.0%
2
5.3%
19
50.0%
17
44.7%
38
100%
From a western European country
0
0.0%
1
2.7%
19
51.4%
17
45.9%
37
100%
From a central of eastern European country
1
2.7%
0
0.0%
20
54.1%
16
43.2%
37
100%
From a Middle Eastern country
0
0.0%
2
5.6%
22
61.1%
12
33.3%
36
100%
Differently abled (i.e. disabled)
0
0.0%
2
6.1%
20
60.6%
11
33.3%
33
100%
Christian0
0.0%
1
3.3%
15
50.0%
14
46.7%
30
100%
Religious but not Christian
0
0.0%
1
3.4%
17
58.6%
11
37.9%
29
100%
Agnostic or atheistic1
3.4%
1
3.4%
15
51.7%
12
41.4%
29
100%
Try not to think about a specific individual, just give your general sense of how comfortable a new faculty member would be in your department if she or he were…(Frequency Distribution)
2012-13 Climate Survey, College of Engineering
53
Satisfaction ITEM UNT CENG
Work at UNT, knowing what you know now 3.79 3.77
Become a faculty member, knowing what you know now 3.86 3.98
Leave UNT if not for family 2.67 2.61
Range: ( 1 = Very unlikely, 5 = Very likely)
How likely would you be to…(Mean)
2012-13 Climate Survey, College of Engineering
54
Satisfaction ITEM Very
unlikelyUnlikely Undecided Likely Very
likelyCENG
N/%
Work at UNT, knowing what you know now 3
6.8%
2
4.5%
6
13.6%
24
54.5%
9
20.5%
44
100%
Become a faculty member, knowing what you know now 0
0.0%
3
6.8%
7
15.9%
22
50.0%
12
27.3%
44
100%
Leave UNT if not for family8
18.2%
14
31.8%
14
31.8%
3
6.8%
5
11.4%
44
100%
How likely would you be to…(Frequency Distribution)
2012-13 Climate Survey, College of Engineering
55
Satisfaction ITEM UNT CENG
Considered quitting your job for another faculty position elsewhere 1.76 1.66
Considered quitting for a different type of position, not at a university 1.35 1.25
Researched faculty opportunities elsewhere 1.79 1.64
Researched universities for other types of positions 1.48 1.39
Wished you had a non-academic job 1.28 1.16
Range: ( 1 = never, 5 = almost every day )
How often have you…(Mean)
2012-13 Climate Survey, College of Engineering
56
Satisfaction ITEM Never,
or a few times
Many times
Almost every
month
Almost every week
Almost every day
CENG
N/%
Considered quitting your job for another faculty position elsewhere
29
65.9%
8
18.2%
2
4.5%
3
6.8%
2
4.5%
44
100%
Considered quitting for a different type of position, not at a university
37
84.1%
5
11.4%
0
0.00%
2
4.5%
0
0.0%
44
100%
Researched faculty opportunities elsewhere 25
56.8%
12
27.3%
5
11.4%
2
4.5%
0
0.0%
44
100%
Researched universities for other types of positions 31
70.5%
10
22.7%
2
4.5%
1
2.3%
0
0.0%
44
100%
Wished you had a non-academic job 40
90.9%
3
6.8%
0
0.0%
0
0.0%
1
2.3%
44
100%
How often have you…(Frequency Distribution)
2012-13 Climate Survey, College of Engineering
57
The following questions refers to the climate at UNT for faculty who are members of underrepresented groups, including underrepresentation based on race, sexual orientation, gender, religion, etc. Please indicate if you agree or disagree with each statement. (Mean)
ClimateITEM UNT CENG
Information about underrepresented groups should be more strongly reflected in the curriculum. 2.64 3.08
UNT should hire more faculty from underrepresented groups. 2.99 2.08
There is too much conflict at UNT related to underrepresented groups. 2.02 2.06
During the last two years subtle discrimination has been a source of stress. 2.14 2.84
Faculty from underrepresented groups are treated fairly at UNT. 2.95 2.25*
Range ( 1 = strongly disagree, 4 = strongly agree) * significant at .05 level
2012-13 Climate Survey, College of Engineering
58
The following questions refers to the climate at UNT for faculty who are members of underrepresented groups, including underrepresentation based on race, sexual orientation, gender, religion, etc. Please indicate if you agree or disagree with each statement. (Frequency Distribution)
ClimateITEM Strongly
disagreeDisagree Agree Strongly
agreeCENG
N/%
Information about underrepresented groups should be more strongly reflected in the curriculum.
5
17.9%
12
42.9%
10
35.7%
1
3.6%
28
100%
UNT should hire more faculty from underrepresented groups. 1
3.1%
8
25.0%
18
56.2%
5
15.6%
32
100%
There is too much conflict at UNT related to underrepresented groups. 617.6%
2161.8%
617.6%
12.9%
34100%
During the last two years subtle discrimination has been a source of stress. 615.8%
2565.8%
513.2%
25.3%
38100.0%
Faculty from underrepresented groups are treated fairly at UNT. 12.6%
37.9%
2668.4%
821.1%
38100%
2012-13 Climate Survey, College of Engineering
59
Open-end ResponsesTopics UNT
N =CENGN =
Hiring Offers 513 32
Hiring Practices 278 19
Teaching 274 11
Research 178 6
Service 218 6
Merit 239 6
Promotion 254 10
Workload 159 3
Resources 169 6
Mentoring 189 8
Work/Family Balance 147 3
Diversity 133 5
Satisfaction 172 8
Climate/Fairness 118 4
Total Responses 3,041 127
2012-13 Climate Survey, College of Engineering