Fig. 1 Cyclone center density as diagnosed by the six different tracking methods during the whole period 19892008 in ERAI.White areas correspond to values of less than 1%.
Fig. 2 Cyclone center density as diagnosed by the six different tracking methods during the whole period 19892008 in ENEAPROTHEUS. White areas correspond to values of less than 1%.
Fig. 3 Cyclone center density as diagnosed by the six different tracking methods during the whole period 19892008 in ENEA.White areas correspond to values of less than 1%.
Fig. 4 Cyclone center density as diagnosed by the six different tracking methods during the whole period 19892008 inCNRMRCSM4. White areas correspond to values of less than 1%.
Fig. 5 Cyclone center density as diagnosed by the six different tracking methods during the whole period 19892008 inCNRMALADIN. White areas correspond to values of less than 1%.
Fig. 6 Cyclone center density as diagnosed by the six different tracking methods during the whole period 19892008 inCOSMONEMO. White areas correspond to values of less than 1%.
Fig. 7 Cyclone center density as diagnosed by the six different tracking methods during the whole period 19892008 inCOSMOCLM. White areas correspond to values of less than 1%.
Fig. 8 Cyclone center density as diagnosed by the six different tracking methods during the whole period 19892008 in WRFNEMO. White areas correspond to values of less than 1%.
Fig. 9 Cyclone center density as diagnosed by the six different tracking methods during the whole period 19892008 in WRF.White areas correspond to values of less than 1%.
Fig. 10 Cyclone center density as diagnosed by the six different tracking methods during the whole period 19892008 in EBUPOM. White areas correspond to values of less than 1%.
Fig. 11 Cyclone center density as diagnosed by the six different tracking methods during the whole period 19892008 in EBU.White areas correspond to values of less than 1%.
Fig. 12 Cyclone center density as diagnosed by the six different tracking methods during the whole period 19892008 inCMCC. White areas correspond to values of less than 1%.
Fig. 13 Cyclone center density as diagnosed by the six different tracking methods during the whole period 19892008 inPROMES. White areas correspond to values of less than 1%.