Path to ProsperityRoger C. Altman, Jason E. Bordoff,
Jason Furman and Robert E. Rubin
HAMILTONTHE
PROJECT
StRAtEgy PAPERSEPtEMBER 2008
The Hamilton Project seeks to advance America’s promise of
opportunity, prosperity, and growth. The Project’s economic
strategy reflects a judgment that long-term prosperity is best
achieved by making economic growth broad-based, by
enhancing individual economic security, and by embracing a
role for effective government in making needed public
investments. Our strategy—strikingly different from the
theories driving economic policy in recent years—calls for fiscal
discipline and for increased public investment in key growth-
enhancing areas. The Project will put forward innovative
policy ideas from leading economic thinkers throughout the
United States—ideas based on experience and evidence, not
ideology and doctrine—to introduce new, sometimes
controversial, policy options into the national debate with
the goal of improving our country’s economic policy.
The Project is named after Alexander Hamilton, the
nation’s first treasury secretary, who laid the foundation
for the modern American economy. Consistent with the
guiding principles of the Project, Hamilton stood for sound
fiscal policy, believed that broad-based opportunity for
advancement would drive American economic growth, and
recognized that “prudent aids and encouragements on the
part of government” are necessary to enhance and guide
market forces.
HAMILTONTHE
PROJECT
Advancing Opportunity, Prosperity and Growth
Printed on recycled paper.
HAMILTONTHE
PROJECT
Path to Prosperity: An Economic Strategy to Achieve More Broadly Shared Growth
Roger C. Altman
Jason E. Bordoff
Jason Furman
Robert E. Rubin
SEPTEMBER 2008
2 PATH TO PROSPERITY
The views expressed in this strategy paper are those of the authors and are not necessarily those of The Hamilton Project
Advisory Council or the trustees, officers, or staff members of the Brookings Institution.
Copyright © 2008 The Brookings Institution
Abstract
Today,toomanyAmericansarenotfullysharinginournation’sprosperity.Realmedianwageshavestagnated,incomeinequalityhasincreased,andchangesintheeconomythathavebroughtbenefitshavealsobroughtnewrisksandinsecurities. Inresponsetothesechallenges,ournationneedstoactnowonthreefronts.First,ournationmustmaketherightlong-terminvestmentstopromoteeconomicgrowththatisbothstrongandsustainable.Second,itisnecessarytoputinplaceeconomicpoliciesthatwillbetterachievebroad-basedparticipationinthatgrowth.Third,forgrowthtobesus-tainable,itisnecessarytorestoresoundfiscalpolicy,movingonamultiyearpathtoasustainablefiscalposition.Thispaperelaboratesontheeconomicchallengesandtherecommendedpolicyresponses.Itconsidersthecommonlyheldviewthatpromotingeconomicgrowth,broad-basedparticipationingrowth,andeconomicsecuritymaybecontradictorypolicyobjectives,butfindsinsteadthattheseob-jectivescanbemutuallyreinforcing.Itarguesthatwhilefreemarketsarethecornerstoneofeconomicgrowth,thereisanecessaryroleforrobustgovernmentactiontosupportandsupplementmarketforcesandtohelpsharethegainsofgrowthmorebroadly.Inanefforttoadvanceinnovativeideasabouthowtoinvestinournation’sfutureprosperityandtoenhancefamilies’economicsecurity,TheHamiltonProjecthasreleasedstrategypapersofferingabroadvisionforpolicyinarangeofareas,aswellasdozensofdiscussionpapersonawidevarietyoftopics.Thesetopicsincludeeducation,healthcare,incomesecurity,scienceandtechnology,taxpolicy,climatechange,energysecurity,infrastruc-ture,workforcetraining,housingandfinancialmarkets,andpovertyreduction,amongothers.Thesepapershaveallbeenwrittenby leadingscholarsandgrounded inreal-worldevidenceaboutwhatworks,notideologyanddoctrine.Thispaperdrawsonthisbodyofworktoofferavisionforhowtoachieveopportunity,prosperity,andstrong,broad-basedeconomicgrowth.
T H E H A M I LT O N P R O J E C T n T H E B R O O k I N g S I N S T I T u T I O N �
Introduction
TheHamiltonProjecthasforthepasttwoandahalfyearsputforthanoverarchingeconomicstrategy,andpolicyoptions consistentwith that strategy,
for promoting strong economic growth, broad-basedparticipation in that growth, and increased economicsecurity.Theproject’sproposalsandpolicydiscussionsspanawiderangeofpolicyareasrelated toachievingstrongeconomicgrowthandhelpingthegainsofthatprosperitytobemorebroadlyshared—education,healthcare,incomesecurity,scienceandtechnology,taxpolicy,climate change, energy security, infrastructure, work-forcetraining,housingandfinancialmarkets,andpov-ertyreduction,amongothers.Theproposalsadvancedhavecomefromleadingacadem-ics, practitioners, and policy analysts fromacross the nation, taking cutting-edge andevidence-based ideas fromeconomists andothersandbringingthemtobearonpolicydebatesinarelevant,accessible,andaction-ableway.Eachideaisofferedasapotential-ly innovative step in therightdirection toupgradethecountry’spolicies,thoughtheyarenotcollectivelyacomprehensive“solution” to thenation’s challenges. Rather, they are intended to pro-vokethoughtanddiscussionandserveasaportfolioofoptionsfromwhichpolicymakersmaychoose.Indeed,at timeswehavereleasedseveraldifferentapproachesto address the same problem, such as how to achieveuniversalhealthcoverage(AndersonandWaters2007;Butler2007;EmanuelandFuchs2007;Gruber2008).
Americanshavelongbelievedthatwitheducationandhardwork,eachgenerationcandobetterthantheonebeforeandthatwhereonestartsinlifeshouldnotdeter-
minewhereoneendsup.Thisbroad-basedopportunityfor individualadvancementhasprovidedan incentiveforentrepreneurship,education,andhardwork—con-tributing to the economic growth that the UnitedStateshasenjoyed.Consistentwith thispromise,oureconomic performance should be measured by howwelleconomicgrowthisraisingthelivingstandardsofallAmericans.WhilepolicymakersarefondofrecitingJohnF.Kennedy’sfamousphrase,a“risingtideliftsallboats,” that is not inevitable. It ismore an aspirationthananaphorism,andinrecentyearsthataspirationhasnotbeenfulfilled(Sperling2007).
Today,toomanyAmericansarenotfullysharinginthenation’sprosperity.Between1947and1973,productivityandrealmedianfamilyincomebothgrewby2.8percentayear.Since1973,however,productivityhasgrownby1.8percentayearwhilerealmedianfamilyincomehasrisenbylessthanhalfofthat.1Thedisconnectbetweenaggregateeconomicgrowthandtheincomeoftypicalfamiliesisaccompaniedbyalargeincreaseininequal-ity.Since1979theshareofincomegoingtothetop1percenthasrisenby8percentagepointswhiletheshareofincomegoingtothebottom80percenthasfallenby
1. EstimatesbasedonBureauofLaborStatisticsproductivitydataandU.S.CensusBureauincomedata.
Our economic performance should be measured by how well economic growth is raising the living standards of all Americans.
� PATH TO PROSPERITY
thesameamount(CBO2006;PickettyandSaez2007).Toprovidesomeperspectiveonthescaleoftheincomeshiftthathasoccurred,considerthattofullyoffsettheincomeshiftin2005wouldhaverequiredtransferring$884billionfromthetop1percentofhouseholdstothebottom80percent—theequivalentofnearly$800,000fromeveryhouseholdinthetop1percentand$10,000toeachhouseholdinthebottom80percent.2Noone
wouldsuggestthis is feasibleorevendesirable,but itprovidesausefulbenchmarkforgaugingthemagnitudeofthepublicpolicyinterventionsthatwouldbeneces-sarytofosterbroad-basedparticipationingrowth.
Atthesametimethatmedianrealwageshavestagnatedandinequalityhasgoneup,changesintheeconomythathavebroughtbenefitshavealsobroughtnewrisksandinsecurities. Structural changes in the economy haveloweredtheunemploymentrate,butatthesametime,theranksofthelong-termunemployedhaverisen.Theincreasedtechnologicalsophisticationofmedicinehasbroughtlongerandhealthierlives,butthehighercostshave also led to a fraying of the employer-sponsoredinsurance system. The shift to defined contributionpensionplans like401(k)sgivesmoreworkersanop-portunitytoparticipateinthegrowthofthemarketbuthasalsoledtonewrisksfacingworkers,particularlytheriskthattheywillfailtoenrollinaplan.
Inresponsetothestagnationofincomesandtheriseininequalityandinsecurity,weneedtoactnowonthreefronts.First,ournationmustmaketherightlong-terminvestmentstopromoteeconomicgrowththatisbothstrongandsustainable.Second,itisnecessarytoputinplaceeconomicpoliciesthatwillbetterachievebroad-
basedparticipation in thatgrowth.Third, forgrowthtobesustainable,itisnecessarytorestoresoundfiscalpolicy,movingonamultiyearpathtoasustainablefis-calposition.
Thispaperelaboratesonthesechallengesandsuggestspolicyresponsestoaddressthem.Itconsidersthecom-monly held view that promoting economic growth,
broad-based participation in growth, andeconomic security may be contradictorypolicyobjectivesbutfindsthatthesecanbemutually reinforcing. It argues that whilefree markets are the cornerstone of eco-nomicgrowth,thereisanecessaryroleforrobust government action to support andsupplementmarketforcesandtohelpsharethegainsofgrowthmorebroadly.
Long-Term Economic Growth
Achieving strong economic growth is a key tomeetingtheeconomicchallengesweface.In-creasedeconomicoutputisnecessaryifweare
toachieverisinglivingstandardsandenhancetheeco-nomicsecurityofAmericanfamilies.Moreover,stron-gergrowthgivesustheresourcesweneedtoaddresscostlychallenges,suchasthefiscalchallengesassociatedwithanagingpopulation,risinghealthcarecosts,andclimatechange.Theimportanceofgrowthgoesbeyonditsmaterialdividends.AsHarvardeconomistBenjaminFriedmanarguedinhisrecentbookThe Moral Conse-quences of Economic Growth(2005),providingfortheeco-nomicwell-beingofthevastmajorityofpeopleencour-agessocialprogressoutsideofstrictlyeconomicgains,specifically“greateropportunity,toleranceofdiversity,socialmobility,commitmenttofairness,anddedicationtodemocracy”(p.4).
Today,America’slong-termeconomicgrowthisimper-iledbecausewearenotmakingtherightlong-termin-vestments:aschoolsystemthatprovidesstudentswithaworld-classeducation,ahealthcaresystemthatpro-videsallourpeoplewithcoverageforasustainablecost,
Today, America’s long-term economic growth is imperiled because we are not making the right long-term investments.
2. Authors’estimatesbasedondatafromtheCBO,“Appendix:DetailedTablesfor1979to2005”(www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs.88xx/doc8885/Appendix_tablestoc.xls[February6,2008]).
T H E H A M I LT O N P R O J E C T n T H E B R O O k I N g S I N S T I T u T I O N �
physicalandtechnologicalinfrastructurethatcanmeetthedemandsofthetwenty-firstcentury,supportforba-sicresearchandinnovation,oranationalenergypolicythatmitigatesclimatechangeandenhancesournationalsecurity.Tobesure,theeconomyfacesextremelyseri-ouschallengesatpresentbutevenaswerespondtothecrisis inourfinancial system,wecannot lose sightofthesignificantinvestmentsweneedtomaketopromotegrowthgoingforward.
Aswe invest inournation’s future, it is critically im-portant thatwealso restorefiscal responsibility,bothto increase economic growth and to make it moresustainable. Large budget deficits are especiallyproblematic given the nation’s low private savingrate and large current account deficit (which itselfis partly caused by the budget deficit). As of early2008, a variety of independent projections suggest-ed the deficit will total more than $5.1 trillion overthe next ten years, or approximately 2.8 percent ofcumulativeGDP(Auerbach,Furman,andGale2008).Giventherecenteconomicdownturnandgovernmentresponse,thatfigureissignificantlyhighertoday.Here-after,asthebabyboomersincreasinglyreachretirementage and claim Social Security and Medicare benefits,governmentdeficits anddebtare likely togrowevenmoresharply.
Mainstreameconomicanalysesofsustainedbudgetdeficitsunderscoretheadverseim-pact of deficits on long-term economicgrowth (Rubin, Orszag, and Sinai 2004).3Underthisconventionalview,ongoingbud-getdeficitsdecreasenationalsaving,whichreducesdomesticinvestmentandincreasesborrowingfromabroad.Theexternalbor-rowing that helps to finance the budgetdeficit is reflected in a larger current account deficit.The reduction indomestic investment (which lowersproductivitygrowth)andtheincreaseinthecurrentac-countdeficit(whichrequiresthatmoreofthereturnsfrom the domestic capital stock accrue to foreigners)bothreducefuturenationalincome,withthelossinin-comesteadilygrowing.
Underthemainstreamview,thecostsimposedbysus-taineddeficitstendtobuildgradually,butinfacttheymayoccurmoresuddenlythantheconventionalanalysissuggests.Substantialdeficitsprojectedfarintothefuturecan cause a fundamental shift in market expectationsandarelatedlossofbusinessandconsumerconfidencebothathomeandabroad,includingalossofconfidenceintheeconomiccompetenceofgovernment.Theun-favorabledynamiceffectsthatcouldensuearelargely,ifnotentirely,excludedfromtheconventionalanalysisofbudgetdeficits.Thisomissionisunderstandableandappropriateinthecontextofdeficitsthataresmallandtemporary;itisincreasinglyuntenable,however,inanenvironment where deficits are large and permanent.Substantialongoingdeficitsmayseverelyandadverselyaffectexpectationsandconfidence,which in turncangeneratea self-reinforcingnegativecycle in thefiscaldeficit,financialmarkets,andtherealeconomy.
Broad-Based Participation in Growth
Strongandsustainablegrowthisanecessary,butnotsufficient,conditiontoincreasepeople’swell-being.Todate, toomanyAmericanshavefailed
to benefit from our nation’s prosperity. This lack ofbroadly-sharedgrowthisnotonlyinconsistentwiththeprinciplethatallAmericansshouldhavetheopportu-
nitytocontributetoandbenefitfromeconomicgrowthbutalsoinconsistentwithhistoricalexperienceinthiscountry.AsBenjaminFriedmanexplains:
Broad-basedeconomicgrowthinAmericawasnotamyth.NorisittruethatthegrowthAmericansenjoyedintheearlypostwardecadeswasmerelyanaberrationtowhichwenonethelessbecameac-
As we invest in our nation’s future, it is critically important that we restore fiscal responsibility, both to increase economic growth and to make it more sustainable.
3. SeealsoCBO,“TheLong-TermEconomicEffectsofSomeAlternativeBudgetPolicies,”lettertotheHonorablePaulRyan,Washington,May19,2008(www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/92xx/doc9216/LongtermBudget_Letter-to-Ryan.pdf).
� PATH TO PROSPERITY
customed.Thepaceofincreaseinlivingstandardsinthoseyearswaslittlemorethanwhatthenationhadexperiencedonaverageduringthepreviouscenturyandahalf.Itisinsteadourownera,datingfromtheearly1970s,thatstandsoutasexception-al.Arisingstandardoflivingforthegreatmajor-ityofourcitizenshasinfactbeentheAmericannorm,anditiswe,today,whoarefailingtoachieveit(Friedman2005,pp.435–36).
Part of the way to promote broader participation ineconomic growth is to put in place policies that willhelppreparepeopletosucceed,forexample,byinvest-inginkeyareassuchaseducationandscience.Higherlevelsofprivatesavingcanalsobetterpreparefamiliesto avoid economic difficulties because saving and as-setaccumulationgivefamiliesafinancialcushionwhenshockshit.
Another part of the way to achieve broadly sharedprosperityistoestablishpoliciesthatwillhelppeoplereboundiftheydoexperienceeconomicdifficultiesbystrengtheningoursocialinsurancesystem.Forexample,universalhealthinsurancewouldmitigatetheriskoffi-nancialdistressduringillness,andwage-lossinsurancecouldbeconsideredinordertosoftentheblowofjoblossforthosewhoarereemployedatalowerwage.
Inaddition,onedirectwaytosharethegainsofgrowthmorebroadly iswithprogressivetaxation.Giventhatprogressive taxation is justifiedby adesire for“equalsacrifice” andby themore fortunate’sgreater“abilitytopay,”thentotheextentthattheshareofthenation’sincomeaccruingtothoseatthetopincreases,theirabil-itytopayshouldincreaseaswell.Thusrisinginequalitystrengthensthecaseforprogressivetaxation.
Economic Growth and Economic Security
Many policymakers and analysts have beentrainedtobelievethatthetwopolicygoalsdiscussed above—promoting strong and
sustainable economic growth, and securing broad-basedparticipation in thatgrowth—arecontradictory
objectives.HarvardeconomistandformerchairmanofPresidentReagan’sCouncilofEconomicAdvisorsMar-tinFeldstein,forexample,hassaidthatsocialinsuranceprograms“have substantial undesirable effects on in-centivesandthereforeoneconomicperformance.Un-employmentinsuranceprogramsraiseunemployment.Retirementpensionsinduceearlierretirementandde-press saving.Andhealth insuranceprograms increasemedicalcosts”(Feldstein2005,p.1).
Tobesure,thistraditionalviewoffersanimportantcau-tionarynote,anditisimportanttobemindfulofwhateconomistscall“moralhazard”whendesigningpublicprograms.Butthistraditionalviewalsomissesanothersalient point about the modern economy: while eco-nomicgrowthcanclearly increaseeconomic security,economicsecuritycanalsoincreaseeconomicgrowth.
For example, a basic level of security frees people totaketherisks—likestartingabusiness,investingintheirowneducation,or trying anunconventional career—thatleadtoeconomicgrowth(Sinn1995).4Withinad-equateprotectionagainstdownsiderisk,peopletendtobeovercautious,“fearingtoventureoutintotherapidswhererealachievementispossible,”asRobertShillerofYalehasargued.“Brilliantcareersgountriedbecauseofthefearofeconomicsetback”(Shiller2003,p.8).
Similarly,ifhardshipdoesoccur,somedegreeofassis-tancecanprovidetheresourcestohelpafamilythriveagain.Familieswithaccesstosomeformoffinancialas-sistance,educationalandtrainingopportunities,andba-sichealthcarearelesslikelytobepermanentlyharmedbythetemporarysetbacksthatareaninevitablepartofadynamic economy.For families experiencing short-termdifficulties,asafetynetcanthusbeaspringboardtoabetterfuture.
Inaddition,increasingeconomicsecurityisimportantto help more of America’s families and communitiesshare in thebenefitsofglobalization andgrowth-en-hancing policies (Bordoff and Furman 2008). Glo-balization offers substantial aggregate economic ben-efits. One study, for example, found a benefit to the
4. Empiricalevidencealsosuggeststhatgenerouspersonalbankruptcylawsareassociatedwithhigherlevelsofventurecapital;thatworkerswhoarehighlyfearfuloflosingtheirjobsinvestlessintheirjobsandjobskillsthanthosewhoaremoresecure;andthatinvestmentineducationandjobskillsishigherwhenworkershavekeyriskprotections.SeeArmourandCumming(2004);Osberg(1998);Esteves-Abe,Iverson,andSoskice(1999);Mocetti(2004).
T H E H A M I LT O N P R O J E C T n T H E B R O O k I N g S I N S T I T u T I O N �
U.S.economyofroughly$1trillionayear(Bradford,Grieco,andHufbauer2005).AsNobelPrize–winningeconomistPaulSamuelson(2005)put itafteranaca-demicpaperhewrotewasmisunderstoodassupportingprotectionism,“Economic history and best economictheorytogetherpersuademethatleavingorcompro-misingfreetradepolicieswillmostlikelyreducegrowthinwellbeinginboththeadvancedandlessproductiveregionsoftheworld.Protectionismbreedsmonopoly,cronycapitalism,andsloth”(p.242).Notonlyisitun-wisetoturninwardandshutouttheforcesofglobal-ization,itisalsounrealisticgiventhesubstantialcross-borderconnectionsthatalreadyexist.Thequestionisnotwhetherglobaleconomicintegrationwillprogressrapidlybutwhether theUnitedStateswillbepartofthatprocessandreaptheresultingbenefits.Moreover,trade drives economic growth throughout the world,particularlyinthedevelopingworld,liftinghundredsofmillionsofpeopleoutofpov-erty(Bhagwati2007;DollarandKraay2002;Collier2007).
Despitetheaggregatebenefits,manywork-ersandcommunitiesarehurtbythedisloca-tionsandrisingincomeinequalityassociatedwithglobalization.Manymorehavelosttheconfidencethattheywillbeabletosucceedinaglobaleconomy.Freetradeadvocateshavelongargued,correctly,thattoincreaseAmerica’spro-ductivityandrestoreconfidence,workersneedthetoolstosucceedthroughgreaterinvestmentineducationandworkforce training.Suchpolicy changes are criticallyimportant,but it is increasinglyevident that theyareinadequatetoaddresstherealchallengesglobalizationposesforAmericanfamilies.Globalizationisundoubt-edlyoneofthefactorsresponsibleforrisinginequalityandinsecurity,togetherwithtechnologicalchangethatincreasingly rewards skilled workers and institutionalchanges(Autor,Katz,andKearney2008;LevyandTe-min2007;Lawrence2008).Infact,Americanworkersperceivethatglobalizationisthekeyculprit(Andersonand Gascon 2007).Yale political scientist Kenneth F.ScheveandDartmoutheconomistMatthewJ.Slaugh-ter, a formermemberofPresidentBush’sCouncil ofEconomicAdvisers,recentlyexplainedtherelationship
betweenincomegrowthandprotectionismthiswayinForeign Affairs (2007):“U.S.policy is becomingmoreprotectionistbecausetheAmericanpublicisbecomingmoreprotectionist,andthisshiftinattitudesisaresultofstagnantorfallingincomes.Publicsupportforen-gagementwiththeworldeconomyisstronglylinkedtolabor-marketperformance,andformostworkerslabor-marketperformancehasbeenpoor”(pp.34-35).
Supportersoftrademustmuchmoreforcefullyadvo-cateforpolicyreformstostrengthenthesafetynetandhelpmakesurethatAmerica’sprosperityismorebroad-lysharedthanhasbeenthecaseinrecentyears,bothbecauseitistherightthingtodoandalsobecauseitwillhavetheindirectbenefitofhelpingtosustainsupportforcontinuedglobalization.Universalhealthinsurance,enhanced retirement security, a reformed unemploy-
ment insurance system, and possibly wage insurancewould all help ease dislocations and cushion incomeshocks.Inaddition,moreprogressivetaxpolicywouldbeanefficient, immediate,well-targeted,andscalablepolicytooltohelpmaximizethenumberofwinnersandminimizethenumberoflosers.TheAmericanbusinesscommunitymaybebeginningtorecognize,aswell,therealitythatcontinuedsupportfortradeandglobaliza-tion,inwhichbusinessinterestshaveanevergrowingstake,iscontingentonpoliciestospreadthebenefitsofglobaleconomicintegrationmorebroadly.5
Inshort,economicgrowthwillultimatelybestrongerandmoresustainableifallAmericanshavetheoppor-tunity to contribute to andbenefit from it. Inpoliti-calterms,excludingsignificantpartsofthepopulationfromthefruitsofeconomicgrowthalsorisksabacklash
government policies that are targeted to those most in need should be well designed, based on evidence and real-world experience about what works.
5. Infact,aJune2007bipartisanreportcommissionedbytheFinancialServicesForumreachedpreciselythatconclusion(Aldonas,Lawrence,andSlaughter2007).
8 PATH TO PROSPERITY
thatcanthreatenprosperity.AsformerFederalReservechairmanAlanGreenspanputit,“Anincreasedconcen-tration of income . . . is not the type of thing whicha democratic society, a capitalist democratic societycanreallyacceptwithoutaddressing”(JointEconomicCommittee2005,p.10).
Effective Government Can Enhance Economic Growth
Markets are the cornerstone of economicgrowth,but soundpublicpolicyandeffec-tive government are also critical to a suc-
cessfuleconomy.Markets themselvescannot functioneffectively without a government to enforce the ruleof law and provide basic regulations. Market forces,whilepotent,willnotbythemselvesgenerateadequateinvestments ineducationand training.Norwillmar-ketsgeneratesufficientinvestmentsinscienceandin-frastructure—such as the type of government-funded“bluesky”researchwithnoimmediatelyapparentcom-mercialviabilitythatledtotheInternet’screation—thatarecrucialtoeconomicgrowth.Marketsalsomayfailtoprovideindividualswiththetoolstomanageeconomicrisk,whichnecessitatessocialinsuranceprogramslikeunemploymentinsurance.Suchgovernmentprogramshelpindividualstoshareinournation’sprosperitybybetterweatheringeconomicstorms.Similarly,marketsdonotsufficientlyprovidemeritgoods,likeeducationorhealthcare,whichcanhelppeople realize theop-portunitiesofamarket-basedeconomy.
Givenourlargefiscalchallengeandscarceresources,itisimportantthatgovernmentpoliciesbetargetedtothosemostinneedandbewelldesigned,basedonevidenceand real-world experience about what works. Spend-ingonineffectiveprogramsorinpoorlytargetedwaysnotonlysquandersscarceresources,italsounderminespublicfaithingovernmentefficacy.Insomecases,evi-dencesupportslargergovernmentinvestments,suchasinearlychildhoodeducation(LudwigandSawhill2007).Inmanyothers,however,governmentresourcescanbebettertargetedthantheyaretoday.Forexample,whilecollegecostshaverisensharply,sohavethereturnsoncollegeattendance.Thusitmaynotbethemosteffec-tiveuseofgovernmentresourcestosubsidizethecostofcollegeforthemanyindividualswhowillmorethanrecouptheirinvestment.Instead,somehaveproposed
thatthegovernmentbettertargetitsresourcestoassistthosewhofallsignificantlyshortofthoseaveragefutureearningsbyexpandingtheavailabilityofincome-con-tingentloans(Moss2007).Althoughthereturnstocol-legeeducationhaveincreased,theyarealsomorevar-ied,sotheinvestmentinacollegeeducationisagreaterriskthanitusedtobe.Theuseofincome-contingentloansallowsthegovernmenttofocuslimitedresourcesonthosewithparticularlylowincomesinagivenyearratherthanprovidelessassistancetoalargernumberofpeople,formanyofwhomtheinvestmentinhighered-ucationpaysoffhandsomely.Similarly,theduplicativeandoftenpoorlydesignedspendingandtaxprogramstosubsidizecollegemaybemuchmoreeffectiveiftheywerecombinedintoasingle,streamlinedprogram(Dy-narskiandScott-Clayton2007).Intheareaofclimatechange,governmentfundscanlikewisebebettertarget-ed.Indeed,thegovernmentcouldmorethandoubletheexistingresearchbudgetforclimatechangeandenergysecurityjustbyredirectingfundsthatarecurrentlyusedforcounterproductiveorunnecessaryenergyprograms(Furmanandothers2007).
Policies to Promote Broad-Based Growth
In an effort to advance innovative ideas about howtoinvestinournation’sfutureprosperityandtoen-hance families’ economic security, The Hamilton
Project has released strategy papers offering a broadvisionforpolicyinarangeofareas,aswellasdozensofdiscussionpapersonawidevarietyoftopicsrelatedtopromotingmorebroad-basedgrowth.Thesediscus-sion papers have all been written by leading scholarsandgroundedinreal-worldevidenceaboutwhatworks,notideologyanddoctrine.
Perhapsthemostimportanttopicishealthcare.Inaddi-tiontothe47millionuninsuredAmericans,thetypicalinsuredfamilypays,directlyandindirectly,morethanone-sixthofitsincomeforhealthcare.Andthisexpen-sivecareisfarlesseffectivethanitshouldbe.Providinguniversal, effective, andaffordablehealth insurance isnotjustamajorsocialobjectivebutalsoaneconomicimperativeforatleastfourreasons:first,rapidlyrisingpremiumsputastrainonbusiness,wages,andjobs;sec-ond,ineffectivecareresultsinalessproductivework-force;third,therapidincreaseinpublichealthspendingisakeycauseoftheseriouslong-termfiscalchallenges
T H E H A M I LT O N P R O J E C T n T H E B R O O k I N g S I N S T I T u T I O N �
wefaceforMedicareandMedicaid;andfourth,Amer-ica’spatchwork,incompletesystemofhealthinsuranceisasourceofeconomicinsecurityforAmericanfamiliesandimpedestheflexibilityofoureconomy,forexample,throughtheproblemof“joblock”thatprecludesem-ployeesfromswitchingemployersforfearoflosingtheirhealthinsurance.AseriesofHamiltonProjectpapershaveaddressedhealthcareissuesspecifically,providingalternativeapproachesforachievinguniversalcoveragealongwithpolicyproposalstoincreaseaffordabilityandimprovequality.
Addressingclimatechangeandpromotingenergysecu-rityareothercriticallyimportantissues.Estimatesindi-catethatadoublingofgreenhousegasconcentrationswouldreduceGDPby1 to1.5percent indevelopedcountries,andbymuchmoreinagriculture-dependentdevelopingcountries.Theeconomyisvulnerabletooilpriceshocks,whichhaveplayedamajorroleinnineofthetenU.S.recessionssinceWorldWarII.Finally,therearegeopoliticalconcernswithourdependenceonoil,whichoftensupportsauthoritariangovernmentsandcontributestotheU.S.militarypresenceintheMiddleEast.
Ourabilitytoaddressthesechallengesinacost-effective manner will not only deter-minehowmuchGDPgrowthisaffectedbyclimatepoliciesbutalsohowmuchindividualfamiliesareburdened—particularlylow-incomefamilies,whichspend14percentoftheirincomeonenergybills(com-pared to the national average of 3.5 percent) (DOE2006).Economists across the political spectrum agreethat the most effective policy is the use of a marketmechanismtoplaceapriceoncarbonemissions,whichwillinducedemandreductionsandfuelsubstitutionbymakingenergymoreexpensive.Yetunlike thehigherprices we are experiencing today, the increased costwill not accrue toOPECcountriesbut rather to theU.S.government,whichcanthenreturnthemoneytofamiliestooffsetthebiteofhigherenergyprices.TheHamiltonProjecthasreleaseddiscussionpapersoffer-ingpolicyproposalstopricecarbon,throughacarbontaxorcap-and-tradesystem,alongwithproposals forwell-targetedgovernmentinvestmentsinenergytech-
nologyandastrategyforengagingthemajoremittingnationsinaninternationalresponsetoclimatechange.
High quality education is also essential to buildinga highly skilled workforce. America’s extraordinarygrowth in the twentieth centurywasunderpinnedbyahugeexpansionineducation.In1940fewerthan25percentofAmericansovertwenty-fiveyearsofagehadahighschooldiploma;by2000morethan80percenthadgraduatedfromhighschool,andthepercentageofAmericans over twenty-five with a bachelor’s degreerose fivefold during that period (Bauman and Graf,2003,p.4).TheincreaseineducationoftheAmericanworkforceaccountedfornearlyonequarterofthetotalgrowthinlaborproductivityfrom1915to1999(GoldinandKatz2001).Asonewell-knownstudyputit,“Edu-cationisboththeseedandtheflowerofeconomicde-velopment”(HarbisonandMyers1965,p.xi.).
Inaddition,inaneraofstagnantmedianrealwages,itismorecriticalthaneverthatallAmericanshavethetoolsthey need to become part of tomorrow’s high-skilledworkforceandshareinournation’sprosperity.Increas-ingreturnstoeducationareoneofthemajordriversofincreasinginequality(Autor,Katz,andKearney2008;Acemoglu2002).Investingineducationcanhelptooff-setthisriseininequality.Andevenworkerswhodonotreceiveanyadditionaleducationwillbenefitindirectlyasthereductioninthesupplyofless-educatedworkersdrives up their wages.The Hamilton Project has re-leasedpolicyproposalsonarangeofeducationtopics,including early childhood education, stemming sum-mer learning loss, improving teacherquality, reform-ingstudentfinancialaid,andincreasingthenumberofscientistsandengineerswegraduate.
Our future work will continue to advance innovative ideas critical to achieving opportunity, prosperity, and strong, broad-based economic growth.
10 PATH TO PROSPERITY
Healthcare,energyandeducationarejustthreeofmanyimportantgrowth-enhancinginvestmentsthatthena-tionneedstomakeinabroadrangeofareasthatTheHamiltonProjecthasaddressedtodate.Othertopicsinclude promoting income security to guard againststeepandunexpecteddropsinincomeandprovidere-tirementsecurity;reformingourtaxsystemtobemoresimple,progressiveandefficient;improvingournation’sinfrastructure;encouragingscience,technologyandin-novation;andrewardingworkandreducingpoverty.
In addition to long-term, growth-enhancing invest-ments,promotingtheeconomicsecurityofAmericanhouseholds also requires near-term responses to ourcurrenthousingcrisisthatlowertherateofforeclosureandhelpfamilieswhoarestrugglingwiththeirmort-gagepayments—particularlyastheunemploymentrateandfoodandfuelpricesrise.Morebroadly,respondingtotheseproblemswillneedtobepartofthesolutiontotherecentfinancialandcreditmarketturmoil.Weak-enedfinancialconditionsareadverselyaffectingtherealeconomy,which in turn isworseningfinancialcondi-tions, creating a vicious cycle that well-targeted andtimelypolicycanhelpmoderate.AperiodofreducedGDPgrowthisinevitable,butpolicycaninfluencetheextentanddurationofthatslowdown.Towardthatend,TheHamiltonProjectoverthepastyearhasreleasedastrategypaperabouthowtousefiscalpolicytostimulate
theeconomyandconvenednumerouspolicyforumsinwhich leadingexpertshavediscussedhowtorespondtothefinancialmarketturmoilandforeclosurecrisis,aswellashowtoavoidsuchcrisesinthefuture.
Conclusion
Todayweare indangerofbreaking thequintes-sentialAmericanpromiseofupwardmobilityforthenextgeneration,therebythreateningnotonly
America’scharacterbutalsoourfutureeconomicprog-ress—atatimewhentheUnitedStatesfacesgrowingchallengestoitscontinuedeconomicprogress,includ-ingrisinginequality,thefailuretomakecriticalinvest-ments,andanunsustainableandeconomicallydamag-inglong-termfiscalposition.Tomeetthesechallenges,the nation must be willing to make necessary invest-ments now to reap benefits later, and to adopt morerobustpoliciestosharethegainsofourprosperitymorebroadlyandenhancetheeconomicsecurityofAmeri-can families.ConsistentwithTheHamiltonProject’scommitment to identify smart, pragmatic policy op-tions,groundedinreal-worldexperienceandevidence,our future work will continue to advance innovativeideasfromleadingeconomicthinkersinarangeofareascriticaltoachievingopportunity,prosperity,andstrong,broad-basedeconomicgrowth.
T H E H A M I LT O N P R O J E C T n T H E B R O O k I N g S I N S T I T u T I O N 11
References
Acemoglu,Daron.2002.“TechnicalChange,InequalityandtheLaborMarket.”Journal of Economic Literature40,no.4:7–72.
Aldonas,GrantD.,RobertZ.Lawrence,andMatthewJ.Slaughter.2007.“SucceedingintheNewEconomy:ANewPolicyAgendafortheAmericanWorker.”PolicyresearchreportWashington:FinancialServicesForum(June26).
Anderson,GerardF.,andHughR.Waters.2007.“AchievingUniversalCoveragethroughMedicarePartE(veryone).”HamiltonProjectDiscussionPaper2007-10.Brookings(July).
Anderson,RichardG.,andCharlesS.Gascon.2007.“ThePerilsofGlobalization:OffshoringandEconomicInsecurityoftheAmericanWorker.”WorkingPaper007-004A.FederalReserveBankofSt.Louis.
Armour,John,andDouglasCumming.2004.“TheLegalRoadtoReplicatingSiliconValley.”WorkingPaper281.CenterforBusinessResearch,UniversityofCambridge.
Auerbach,AlanJ.,JasonFurman,andWilliamG.Gale.2008“FacingtheMusic:TheFiscalOutlookattheEndoftheBushAdministration.”WorkingPaper.(May8)
Autor,DavidH.,LawrenceF.Katz,andMelissaS.Kearney.2008.“TrendsinU.S.WageInequality:RevisingtheRevisionists.”Review of Economics and Statistics90,no.2:300–23.
Bauman,KurtJ.,andNikkiL.Graf.2003.“EducationalAttainment:2000.”Census2000Brief.U.S.CensusBureau(August).
Bhagwati,Jagdish.2007.In Defense of Globalization.2ded.OxfordUniversityPress.
Bordoff,Jason,andJasonFurman.“ProgressiveTaxReformintheEraofGlobalization.”Harvard Law and Policy Review 2, no.2:327-360.
Bradford,ScottC.,PaulL.E.Grieco,andGaryClydeHufbauer.2005.“ThePayofftoAmericafromGlobalIntegration.”InThe United States and the World Economy: Foreign Economic Policy for the Next Decade,editedbyC.FredBergsten,pp.65–110.Washington:PetersonInstituteforInternationalEconomics.
Butler,StuartM.2007.“EvolvingBeyondTraditionalEmployer-SponsoredHealthInsurance.”HamiltonProjectDiscussionPaper2007-06.Brookings(July).
Collier,Paul.2007.The Bottom Billion: Why the Poorest Countries Are Failing and What Can Be Done about It.NewYork:OxfordUniversityPress.
CongressionalBudgetOffice(CBO).2006.Historicaleffectivefederaltaxrates:1979to2004,SupplementalTables.Washington,DC(December).www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/77xx/doc7718/SupplementalTables.xls.
DepartmentofEnergy(DOE).2006.“DOEProvides$96.4MilliontoLow-IncomeFamiliesforHomeWeatherization.”DOE,Washington,DC(July6).
Dollar,David,andAartKraay.2002.“GrowthIsGoodforthePoor.”Journal of Economic Growth7,no.3:195–225.
Dynarski,SusanM.,andJudithE.Scott-Clayton.2007.“College
GrantsonaPostcard:AProposalforSimpleandPredictableFederalStudentAid.”HamiltonProjectDiscussionPaper2007-01.Brookings(February).
Emanuel,EzekielJ.,andVictorR.Fuchs.2007.“AComprehensiveCure:UniversalHealthCareVouchers.”HamiltonProjectDiscussionPaper2007-11.Brookings(July).
Esteves-Abe,Margarita,TorbenIverson,andDavidSoskice.1999.“SocialProtectionandtheFormationofSkills:AReinterpretationoftheWelfareState.”PaperpreparedfortheNinety-FifthAmericanPoliticalScienceAssociationMeeting,Atlanta.(September2–5)
Feldstein,Martin.2005.“RethinkingSocialInsurance.”American Economic Review95,no.1:1–24.
Friedman,BenjaminM.2005.The Moral Consequences of Economic Growth.NewYork:Knopf.
Furman,Jasonandothers.2007.“AnEconomicStrategytoAddressClimateChangeandPromoteEnergySecurity.”HamiltonProjectStrategyPaper.Brookings(October).
Goldin,Claudia,andLawrenceF.Katz.2001.“TheLegacyofU.S.EducationalLeadership:NotesonDistributionandEconomicGrowthintheTwentiethCentury.”American Economic Review91,no.2:18–23.
Gruber,Jonathan.2008.“TakingMassachusettsNational:IncrementalUniversalismfortheUnitedStates.”HamiltonProjectDiscussionPaper2008-04.Brookings(August).
Harbison,Frederick,andCharlesMyers,eds.1965.Manpower and Education.NewYork:McGraw-Hill.
JointEconomicCommittee.2005.The Economic Outlook.HearingsbeforetheJointEconomicCommittee.109Cong.1sess.GovernmentPrintingOffice(June9).
Lawrence,RobertZ.2008.Blue-Collar Blues: Is Trade to Blame for Rising U.S. Income Inequality?Washington:PetersonInstituteforInternationalEconomics.
Levy,Frank,andPeterTemin.2007.“InequalityandInstitutionsin20thCenturyAmerica.”WorkingPaper07-17.DepartmentofEconomics,MassachusettsInstituteofTechnology.
Ludwig,Jens,andIsabelleSawhill.2007.“SuccessbyTen:InterveningEarly,Often,andEffectivelyintheEducationofYoungChildren.”HamiltonProjectDiscussionPaper2007-02.Brookings(February).
Mocetti,Sauro.2004.“SocialProtectionandHumanCapital:TestofaHypothesis.”WorkingPaper425.DepartmentofEconomics,UniversityofSiena.
Moss,DavidA.2007.“CollegeAccessforAll:PromotingInvestmentinEducationthroughIncome-ContingentLending.”PaperpreparedfortheTobinProjectRiskPolicyWorkingGroup,Cambridge,Mass.,(May6).
Osberg,Lars.1998.“EconomicInsecurity.”DiscussionPaper88.SocialPolicyResearchCenter,UniversityofNewSouthWales.
12 PATH TO PROSPERITY
Piketty,ThomasandEmanuelSaez.2007.IncomeInequalityintheUnitedStates,1913-2005,TableA3:Topfractileincomeshares(includingcapitalgains)intheU.S.,1913-2005(March).http://elsa.berkeley.edu/~saez/TabFig2005prel.xls.
Rubin,RobertE.,PeterR.Orszag,andAllenSinai.2004.“SustainedBudgetDeficits:Longer-RunU.S.EconomicPerformanceandtheRiskofFinancialandFiscalDisarray.”Paperpreparedfor“NationalEconomicandFinancialPoliciesforGrowthandStability,”AndrewBrimmerPolicyForum,AlliedSocialSciencesAssociationsAnnualMeeting,SanDiego,(January4).
Samuelson,PaulA.2005.“ResponsefromPaulA.Samuelson.”Journal of Economic Perspectives19,no.3:241–245.
Scheve,KennethF.,andMatthewJ.Slaughter.2007.“ANewDealforGlobalization.”Foreign Affairs86,no.4:34–47.
Shiller,Robert.2003.The New Financial Order: Risk in the 21stCentury.PrincetonUniversityPress.
Sinn,Hans-Werner.1995.“SocialInsurance,Incentives,andRiskTaking.”WorkingPaper5335.Cambridge,Mass.:NationalBureauofEconomicResearch.
Sperling,Gene.2007.“RisingTideEconomics.”Democracy: A Journal of Ideas61,no.6:61–73.
Acknowledgments
Overthepastseveralyears,manyleadingpolicyfigureshavesharedtheirwisdom,adviceandinsightswithusaswedevelopedtheeconomicstrategythatunderliesTheHamiltonProject’sworkandthespecificpolicyproposalsthatpromotethatstrategy.Thoughtoomanytoname,wearegratefultoallfortheirgenerosity,support,andunwaver-inginsistenceonanalyticalrigor.WeareparticularlygratefultoTheHamiltonProject’sAdvisoryCouncilmembers,whohavesustainedandguidedoureffortsandwithoutwhomourpolicyworkwouldnotbepossible.TheHamiltonProjecthasbeenfortunatetoattractanexceptionallytalentedcadreofstaffmembersovertheyearswhohavehelpedbringourpolicyproposalstofruition,andwethankofallthemfortheirinspiredworkanddedicationtoourmis-sion.TheHamiltonProjecthasalsobenefitedenormouslyfrommakingitshomewithinoneofthenation’smostrespectedthinktanks,andweareverygratefultotheleadershipandstaffoftheBrookingsInstitutionfortheircon-tinuedsupportandencouragement.Finally,wewishtothankthemanyleadingacademicsandanalystswhosharedtheirinnovativeideasforpolicyreformwithusanddrewontheirvastexpertiseandempiricalresearchtodevelopthoseideasintoHamiltonProjectdiscussionpapers.
T H E H A M I LT O N P R O J E C T n T H E B R O O k I N g S I N S T I T u T I O N 1�
Authors
ROGERC.ALTMAN
RogerC.Altmanhasservedsince1996aschairmanandchiefexecutiveofficerofEvercorePartners,currentlythemostactiveinvestmentbankingboutiqueintheworld.AltmanservedtwotoursofdutyintheU.S.TreasuryDepart-ment,initiallyunderPresidentCarterasassistantsecretaryfordomesticfinanceandlaterunderPresidentClintonasdeputysecretary.PreviouslyhewasvicechairmanoftheBlackstoneGroupandresponsibleforitsinvestmentbankingbusiness.AltmanisaTrusteeofNewYork-PresbyterianHospital,servingonitsInvestmentCommittee,andalsoisViceChairmanofTheBoardofTheAmericanMuseumofNaturalHistory.HeisaTrusteeofNewVisionsforPublicSchoolsandisamemberofTheCouncilonForeignRelations.HereceivedanA.B.fromGeorgetownUniversityandanM.B.A.fromtheUniversityofChicago.
JASONE.BORDOFF
JasonBordoffisPolicyDirectoroftheHamiltonProject.Bordoffhaswrittenonabroadrangeofeconomicpolicymatters,particularlyincomesecurityandinequality,taxpolicy,andclimatechangeandenergy.BordoffisalsoatermmemberoftheCouncilonForeignRelationsandservesontheboardoftheAssociationofMarshallScholars.HepreviouslyservedasanadvisortoDeputySecretaryStuartE.EizenstatattheU.S.TreasuryDepartmentandworkedasaconsultantforMcKinsey&Co.HegraduatedwithhonorsfromHarvardLawSchool,wherehewastreasurerandaneditoroftheHarvardLawReview,andclerkedontheU.S.CourtofAppealsfortheD.C.Circuit.HealsoholdsanMLittdegreefromOxfordUniversity,wherehestudiedasaMarshallScholar,andaB.A.magnacumlaudeandPhiBetaKappafromBrownUniversity.
JASONFURMAN
JasonFurmanisaseniorfellowattheBrookingsInstitution(currentlyonleave).Hehasconductedresearchandpolicyworkinawiderangeofeconomicpolicyareas,includingfiscalpolicy,taxpolicy,healtheconomics,SocialSecu-rity,andmonetarypolicy.In2005,CQnamedhimoneofthefiveSocialSecurityanalystswho“exertmoreinfluenceovertheSocialSecuritydebatethananyotherindividualsoutsidegovernment.”FurmanpreviouslyservedasdirectorofTheHamiltonProject.FurmanhasbeenavisitinglectureratColumbiaandYaleUniversitiesandatNewYorkUniversity’sWagnerSchoolofPublicService.HereceivedhisPh.D.ineconomicsfromHarvardUniversity.
ROBERTE.RUBIN
RobertE.Rubinhasbeeninvolvedwithfinancialmarketsandournation’spublicpolicydebatesallofhisprofessionallife.Mr.RubinbeganhiscareerinfinanceatGoldman,Sachs&CompanyinNewYorkCityin1966andservedasCo-SeniorPartnerandCo-Chairmanfrom1990-1992.LongactiveinbothnationalandNewYorkCity’spublicaffairs,hejoinedtheClintonAdministrationin1993asAssistanttothePresidentforEconomicPolicyandthefirstDirectoroftheNationalEconomicCouncil.HeservedastheseventiethSecretaryoftheTreasuryfromJanuary1995untilJuly1999.Mr.RubinjoinedCitigroupin1999wherehecurrentlyservesasaDirectorandSeniorCounselor.HealsoservesaschairmanoftheboardoftheLocalInitiativesSupportCorporation,thenation’sleadingcommunitydevelopmentsupportorganization,aswellasontheboardoftrusteesofMountSinai–NYUHealthandasamemberoftheHarvardCorporation.InJune2007Rubinwasnamedco-chairoftheCouncilonForeignRelations.
HAMILTONTHE
PROJECT
Advancing Opportunity, Prosperity and Growth
GeorGe A. Akerlofkoshland Professor of economics, University of California, Berkeley and 2001 Nobel laureate in economics
roGer C. AltmANChairman, evercore Partners
HowArd P. Berkowitzmanaging director, Blackrock Chief executive officer, Blackrock HPB management
AlAN S. BliNderGordon S. rentschler memorial Professor of economics, Princeton University
timotHy C. ColliNSSenior managing director and Chief executive officer, ripplewood Holdings, llC
roBert e. CUmByProfessor of economics, School of foreign Service, Georgetown University
Peter A. diAmoNdinstitute Professor, massachusetts institute of technology
JoHN doerrPartner, kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers
CHriStoPHer edley, Jr.dean and Professor, Boalt School of law – University of California, Berkeley
BlAir w. effroNPartner, Centerview Partners, llC
HArold ford, JrVice Chairman, merrill lynch
mArk t. GAlloGlymanaging Principal, Centerbridge Partners
miCHAel d. GrANoffChief executive officer, Pomona Capital
GleNN H. HUtCHiNSfounder and managing director, Silver lake Partners
JAmeS A. JoHNSoNVice Chairman, Perseus, llC and former Chair, Brookings Board of trustees
NANCy killeferSenior director, mckinsey & Co.
Advisory CounCil
JACoB J. lewmanaging director and Chief operating officer, Citigroup Global wealth management
eriC miNdiCHChief executive officer, eton Park Capital management
SUzANNe NorA JoHNSoNSenior director and former Vice Chairman the Goldman Sachs Group, inc.
riCHArd PerryChief executive officer, Perry Capital
SteVeN rAttNermanaging Principal, Quadrangle Group, llC
roBert reiSCHAUerPresident, Urban institute
AliCe m. riVliNSenior fellow, the Brookings institution and director of the Brookings washington research Program
CeCiliA e. roUSeProfessor of economics and Public Affairs, Princeton University
roBert e. rUBiNdirector and Senior Counselor, Citigroup inc.
rAlPH l. SCHloSSteiNPresident, Blackrock, inc.
GeNe SPerliNGSenior fellow for economic Policy, Center for American Progress
tHomAS f. SteyerSenior managing Partner, farallon Capital management
lAwreNCe H. SUmmerSCharles w. eliot University Professor, Harvard University
lAUrA tySoNProfessor, Haas School of Business, University of California, Berkeley
dANiel B. zwirNmanaging Partner, d.B. zwirn & Co.
doUGlAS w. elmeNdorfdirector