Intended for
Poole Harbour Commissioners
Report Reference
HCL 054140114v9
Date
May 2014
HARBOURS ACT 1964 (AS AMENDED)
THE POOLE HARBOUR REVISION
(WORKS) ORDER 2014
ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT
VOLUME 4: NAVIGATION RISK
ASSESSMENT
FINAL
CONTENTS
1. Introduction ................................................................................................... 1
2. Site Information and Proposed Developments ..................................................... 2
3. Methodology ................................................................................................... 4
4. Potential Impacts of the Proposed Developments ................................................ 6
5. Mitigation and Enhancement Measures............................................................. 10
6. Residual Significant Impacts ........................................................................... 15
7. Summary of Potential Impacts ........................................................................ 16
8. Limitations and Assumptions .......................................................................... 18
9. Conclusion ................................................................................................... 18
FIGURES
FIGURE 1 SITE LOCATION PLAN
FIGURE 2 EXISTING SITE LAYOUT
FIGURE 3 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENTS
1
1. INTRODUCTION
1.0.1 Ramboll has been appointed by Poole Harbour Commissioners, (PHC, the ‘applicant’)
to undertake an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) for the elements identified in
the Port of Poole Master Plan that relate to the development and modernisation of the
commercial Port infrastructure (hereafter referred to as the ‘proposed developments’).
The proposed developments are located in Poole Harbour wholly within the boundary
of the Borough of Poole. The proposed developments are described in Section 2 of the
Environmental Statement (ES) (report reference 19463/ENV/R03).
1.0.2 This Navigation Risk Assessment (hereafter referred to as NRA) forms one in a series
of supporting documents to the EIA and as such should be read in conjunction with
the ES.
2
2. SITE INFORMATION AND PROPOSED DEVELOPMENTS
2.0.1 The Port of Poole is a Trust Port established in 1895 and managed by Poole Harbour
Commissioners (PHC). The Port is located at approximately National Grid Reference
SZ010900 on the northern shore of Poole Harbour, a large semi-enclosed water body
on the central south coast of the United Kingdom (UK). The Port occupies the western
side of the shoreline adjacent to the Backwater Channel, which connects Holes Bay
with the main Harbour water body. The main commercial, retail and residential areas
of Poole lie to the north east of the Port, across the Little Channel, whilst the
residential and commercial areas of Hamworthy occupy the peninsula on the western
side of the channel to the north west of the Port. The existing commercial Port is
linked to the town by both Poole Bridge and Twin Sails Bridge, which opened in April
2012.
2.0.2 The Port currently runs commercial operations from approximately 24 hectares of
land, with cross-Channel freight and passenger Ro-Ro ferries as well as conventional
bulk cargo vessels utilising the Port. In addition, PHC run two marinas, one to the
south east of the Port area (Port of Poole Marina), and one off Poole Quay (Poole Quay
Boat Haven). The Port also hosts visiting cruise ships throughout the year. Please see
Figure 1 for a Site Location Plan and Figure 2 for an Existing Site Layout Plan.
2.0.3 A Master Plan for the proposed developments of the Port over the next 25 years was
prepared and adopted by the Poole Harbour Commissioners in March 2013. This
Master Plan includes proposals for a number of new and improved facilities which
would be delivered separately over the period covered by the Master Plan. Consent
for the proposed developments in the Master Plan will be applied for via Harbour
Revisions Orders (HROs) from the Marine Management Organisation (MMO). This
report forms part of the application for consent for all proposals in the Master Plan
attached to the existing commercial Port.
2.0.4 The HRO proposes a series of ‘works’ (works 1 to 10, as set out in the HRO) in five
‘phases’ of development as follows:
Phase 1 (HRO works 1 and 2): The creation of South Quay, a new 180m long deep
water south-facing quay dredged to 9.0m Below Chart Datum (BCD), to be
used by a variety of craft such as cruise ships, small container feeder ships,
bulk cargo vessels, and possibly wind park construction vessels. This
development would require approximately 8,000m2 of reclamation and allow
for the retention of the Port of Poole Marina;
Phase 2 (HRO works 3 and 4): Increase the width of South Quay by a further 20m
and develop 120m of east-facing berth (East Quay) dredged to 7.5m BCD.
This development would produce a further 7,000m2 of reclamation, reducing
the capacity of the Port of Poole Marina;
Phase 3 (HRO works 5 and 6): Deepening of existing conventional quays including
Ballast Quay, Bulwark Quay, New Quay and New Quay extension to 7.5m BCD
(referred to in the adopted Master Plan as ‘Proposal C’), with minor
modifications to the line of the existing quays including raising the coping to
address flood defence considerations and creating 2,600m2 of reclaimed land;
Phase 4 (HRO works 7 and 8): Completion of East Quay, extending northwards to join
New Quay extension, eliminating the Port of Poole Marina and creating a
further 22,000m2 of operating land. (This scheme is referred to as ‘Proposal B’
in the adopted Master Plan);
3
Phase 5 (HRO works 9 and 10): Reconstruction of the existing Ro-Ro berths to
facilitate deeper drafted vessels. This would involve a berthing face of 350m
dredged to 9.0m BCD. The footprint of reclamation for this development would
be 5,000m2.
2.0.5 The proposed developments are shown on Figure 3.
2.0.6 For the purposes of the EIA this Technical Annex has assessed a “worst case” scenario
which assumes that all of the above developments will come forward at some point
during the life of the Master Plan. The HRO that this EIA accompanies, however, will
seek permission for all of the developments described above, with the appropriate
licences and permissions being applied for as and when required. An initial
construction programme has been identified in Table 1 below.
Table 1 Initial Construction Programme
Phase 1
South
Quay
Phase 2
Extension
of South
Quay
Phase 3
Deepening
Conventiona
l Quays
Phase 4
Completion
of East
Quay &
infill Port
of Poole
Marina
Phase 5
Reconstruction
RoRo berths
Total
Contract
Duration
6-9
months
6-9 months 4-6 months 4-6 months 4-6 months
Potential
Project
Start Date
Jan 2015 Jan 2017 Jun 2017 Jan 2018 Jan 2019
2.0.7 For further information on the proposed developments, including construction
principles, please refer to the Environmental Statement (19463/ENV/R03).
4
3. METHODOLOGY
3.0.1 The NRA is based on industry risk assessment standard methodology as follows:
Identify hazards, known here as impacts;
Assess control measures, known here as mitigation and enhancement measures;
Assess the residual significant impacts allowing for the implementation of the
mitigation and enhancement measures.
3.0.2 The potential impacts of the proposed developments (see Section 4) describe the
likely significant impact of the development’s design and construction. These impacts
were developed following consultation with PHC, site visits and review of current
documentation and policies as detailed below.
a) Initial site visit, 11th December 2012, proposed sites were visited with a PHC
authority to guide and explain the proposals. This was conducted on foot and by
PHC launch.
b) Initial meeting with Harbour Master, 24 January 2013, to establish scope of the
NRA and request for supporting documentation.
c) Hazard identification meeting, 3 April 2013 attended by Harbour Master, VTS
manager, Tug Master, Pilot and Assistant Harbour Master.
d) On board inbound ship with Pilot which was manoeuvred off the proposed
development site – 5 July 2013
e) Review of existing PHC documentation, this included:-
Poole Harbour Commissioners Local Notices to Mariners – valid in January
2013
Marine Accidents in Harbour Waters: Results from the Marine Safety Pilot
Study
Annual Marine Safety Reports – 2008 to 2012
Designated Person Report for PHC – 30 March 2012
Designated Person Report for PHC – 28 September 2012
PHC Port Marine Safety Code audit
PHC Bridges Navigational Hazard Meeting – 28 February 2012
Port of Poole Marina – Harbour Masters Safety Notice
PHC Monthly Marine Safety Reports – January 2008 to December 2012
3.0.3 The mitigation and enhancement measures (Section 5) would assist in controlling the
risk of the impact occurring and the severity of the impact if it were to occur. These
measures were assessed during the consultation, site visit and document review stage
and have been categorised as, existing, proposed or recommended.
5
3.0.4 The residual significant impacts (Section 6) likely to occur following the effective
implementation of mitigation measures have been identified and summarised.
3.0.5 A summary of the potential impacts of the proposed developments (Section 7)
provides a project specific reference for the NRA. This format is specific to all
technical specialist areas to allow for cross referencing of impact and design of the
project as a whole.
6
4. POTENTIAL IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSED
DEVELOPMENTS
4.0.1 The potential impacts of the proposed developments were categorised in accordance
with the incident types identified in Marine Accidents in Harbour Waters: Results from
the Marine Safety Pilot Study.
4.0.2 This Department for Transport pilot study collected incident data covering the period
2005 – 2009 from 13 UK harbour authorities, including Poole Harbour.
4.0.3 The NRA categorised potential impacts of the proposed developments as:-
Collision - Vessel contact with other vessel or floating object whilst underway,
alongside or at anchor;
Contact – Vessel making contact with Harbour infrastructure or fixed structure;
Grounding – Vessel making contact with sea bed or underwater obstruction;
Near Miss – The passing of two or more vessels within an acceptable safe distance;
Fire/Explosion/Flood – Occurring on board a vessel or caused by a vessel due to the
proposed developments;
Pollution – Resulting from any of the above;
Machinery Failure – Failure resulting in loss of control or adequate control;
Capsize/listing;
Other on board incidents.
4.0.4 Each potential impact was categorised using the above titles and entered in a
summary table. The “Potential Impact” column summarises each impact. The
“Potential Effect” column states if any of the proposals, as defined in Section 2, would
potentially be affected.
4.1 Collision
Collision
Potential Impact Potential
Effect
4.1.1
Increased size of commercial vessel operating in the Port.
Maximum sized vessel defined as 185m length over all, 25m
beam and 7m draft – possible specialist vessel for wind farm
with beam 40m.
Yes
4.1.2 Increased frequency of commercial vessels. Yes
4.1.3
New berths of South Quay (including section in Little Channel)
would reduce width of current sea room and require vessels
to pass at closer distance increasing risk of interaction.
Yes
7
Collision
Potential Impact Potential
Effect
4.1.4
Vessels and barges during the construction phase would
operate in the current navigable waters restricting other
vessels.
Yes
4.1.5 Large commercial vessels passing in the Main Channel. Yes
4.1.6 Leisure and small commercial craft drawn into the larger
commercial ship due to suction. Yes
4.1.7 Large commercial vessel manoeuvring off the berths and
entering the Little Channel. Yes
4.1.8
Increased tidal current speed to the east of the proposed
developments in the Little Channel and to the south of South
Quay. Possible impact on manoeuvring vessels in this area.
Yes
4.2 Contact
Contact
Potential Impact Potential
Effect
4.2.1 Contact with proposed berth while large commercial vessel is
manoeuvring to berth or “backing up” down the Little Channel.
Yes
4.2.2 Increase and/or changes to tidal effect in vicinity of swinging
area and turning basin and Little Channel. The proposed
developments will add berths and breakwaters which may have
the potential to affect the present tidal conditions. These
potential changes will need to be fully understood when
manoeuvring a vessel in the area.
Yes
4.2.3 Proposed new berths and breakwaters contact during hours of
darkness or restricted visibility. All vessels will need to be fully
aware of any new construction which they may not be familiar
with.
Yes
4.2.4 Any vessel may make contact with temporary or semi
completed permanent structures during construction phase.
Yes
4.2.5 Increased tidal current speed to the east of the proposed
developments in the Little Channel and to the south of South
Quay. Possible impact on manoeuvring vessels in this area.
Yes
8
4.3 Grounding
Grounding
Potential Impact Potential
Effect
4.3.1
Increased maximum draft of large commercial ship would
reduce available under keel clearance.
Yes
4.3.2 Increased size of commercial ship would increase the suction
effect surrounding the main channel causing grounding of
leisure and small commercial vessels.
Yes
4.3.3 Grounding by any vessel on underwater obstructions during the
construction phase.
Yes
4.3.4 Reduction in navigable waters at the present location used for
turning large commercial ships. This may result in large
commercial vessels leaving the channel whilst manoeuvring
during strong wind and tidal effect.
Yes
4.3.5 Increased size of commercial ships may exceed current
capability of tugs.
Yes
4.3.6 Pilots currently board visiting commercial ships just outside the
buoyed channel. This position may not allow enough time for
the passing of safety critical information between the pilot and
the vessels master of a large commercial ship due to the
increased size of vessels and increase in safety related
information.
Yes
4.4 Near Miss
Near Miss
Potential Impact Potential
Effect
4.4.1 The potential impacts for Near Miss are assessed as the same
as those for Collision.
N/A
4.5 Fire/Explosion
Fire/Explosion
Potential Impact Potential
Effect
4.5.1 Potential increase in likelihood of fire or explosion resulting
from increase potential impact of Collision, Contact or
Grounding.
Yes
9
4.6 Pollution
Pollution
Potential Impact Potential
Effect
4.6.1 Potential increase in likelihood of pollution resulting from
increase potential impact of Collision, Contact or Grounding.
Yes
4.7 Machinery Failure
Machinery Failure
Potential Impact Potential
Effect
4.7.1 A machinery failure may result in the loss of control of the
vessel which may lead to grounding, collision or contact. The
probability of machinery failure impact is increased if existing
tugs not sufficient for increased size of vessels.
Yes
4.8 Capsize/Listing
Capsize/Listing
Potential Impact Potential
Effect
4.8.1 Potential increase in likelihood of capsize or listing resulting
from increase potential impact of Collision, Contact or
Grounding.
Yes
4.9 Other on Board Incidents
Other on board incidents
Potential Impact Potential
Effect
4.9.1 None noted. NA
10
5. MITIGATION AND ENHANCEMENT MEASURES
5.0.1 The potential mitigation and enhancement measures that currently exist, or could be
implemented were compared against each of the potential impacts identified in
Section 4.
5.0.2 The mitigation and enhancement measures were identified as either, existing,
proposed or recommended.
Existing – these mitigation methods were found to be in place during the NRA
process;
Proposed – these mitigation methods were not in place at the time of the NRA but
PHC are committed to their implementation before or during the construction
phase of the proposed developments. These were discussed with PHC during the
NRA process; and
Recommended – these mitigation methods were not in place at the time of the
NRA. They were identified by the NRA process and discussed with PHC. It is
understood these recommended mitigation methods will be adopted by PHC
before the operation of the proposed developments.
5.0.3 The mitigation and enhancement measures were categorised the same way as the
potential impacts (Section 4) to allow for easier reference.
5.1 Collision
Collision
Mitigation and Enhancement Measures Potential
Effect
Existing
5.1.1 Existing policy and procedure for PHC Controlled Vessel would
apply to any maximum sized commercial vessel and special
craft. This includes exclusion zones around the vessel and
navigation warnings broadcast on VHF.
Yes
5.1.2 VTS Port Control provides VHF, Radar and AIS monitoring of
all vessel movements in the Port and advice to embarked
pilots and large commercial vessels.
Yes
5.1.3 Port Control is in communication with Poole Bridge and able to
request a stop of bridge lifts to prevent a high volume of
leisure craft existing the Little Channel when commercial
vessel is manoeuvring.
Yes
Proposed
5.1.4
PHC Enforcement vessels operate in the Port including PWC
and RIBs during summer months when leisure vessel activity
is high.
Yes
11
Collision
Mitigation and Enhancement Measures Potential
Effect
Existing
5.1.5 All vessels and barges involved with the construction phase
would be required to observe the existing Port Control and
Pilotage requirements. Dredgers may be requested by Port
Control to clear their current position to allow for a vessel
manoeuvre.
Yes
5.1.6
Port Control upgrades to include re-location of radar scanner
plus additional scanner on South Haven to improve radar
coverage. Plus additional AIS reception.
Yes
5.1.7
Exclusion zones would be established around working vessels
during the construction phase. VHF navigation warning would
be issued and PHC Notice to Mariners issued.
Yes
Recommended
5.1.8
Review of the passing positions for large vessels in the Main
Channel. Consider no passing procedure close to the
proposed designs especially during construction.
Yes
5.1.9
Review PHC Controlled Vessel procedure for manoeuvring
larger vessels in the vicinity of South Quay. This should allow
for the reduction in navigable waters and changes in tidal
flow. Consideration should be given to maximum allowable
wind speeds and tidal strength and clear guidance available to
visiting ships, Pilots and VTS.
Yes
5.1.10
Review and publish Notice to Mariners regarding increased
effect of suction from large vessels in the Main Channel on
leisure craft. Review speed reduction policy for estimated
maximum sized vessel.
Yes
5.2 Contact
Contact
Mitigation and Enhancement Measures Potential
Effect
Existing
5.2.1
VTS Port Control provides VHF, Radar and AIS monitoring of all
vessel movements in the Port and advice to embarked pilots
and large commercial vessels.
Yes
5.2.2
Port Control is in communication with Poole Bridge and able to
request a stop of bridge lifts to prevent high volume of leisure
craft existing the Little Channel when commercial vessel is
manoeuvring.
Yes
12
Contact
Mitigation and Enhancement Measures Potential
Effect
Existing
5.2.3 All vessels and barges involved with the construction phase
would be required to observe the existing Port Control and
Pilotage requirements. Dredgers may be requested by Port
Control to clear their current position to allow for a vessel
manoeuvre.
Yes
Proposed
5.2.4
Review of the passing positions for large vessels in the Main
Channel. Consider no passing procedure close to the proposed
designs especially during construction.
Yes
5.2.5
Review PHC Controlled Vessel procedure for manoeuvring
larger vessels in the vicinity of South Quay. This should allow
for the reduction in navigable waters and changes in tidal flow.
Consideration should be given to maximum allowable wind
speeds and tidal strength and clear guidance available to
visiting ships, Pilots and VTS.
Yes
Recommended
5.2.7
New berths require adequate fender arrangements. This
should be reviewed by PHC at design stage.
Yes
5.2.8
New berth South Quay corner to be well illuminated to ensure
adequate visibility during hours of darkness and restricted
visibility.
Yes
5.2.9
The changes in tidal strength and/or direction due to the
developments should be incorporated into a full mission bridge
simulator. This would allow PHC to simulate manoeuvring
large commercial vessels with other ships alongside the new
berths.
Yes
5.2.10
Revise the Port Passage plan allowing for changes in margins of
safety due to the new developments and changes in tidal
conditions.
Yes
5.2.11
Portable Pilotage Units should be considered for embarked
Pilots to assist in situational awareness and monitoring of
safety margins.
Yes
5.2.12
Pre-arrival checklist for visiting commercial ships and to assist
with the Master-Pilot exchange. This should include allowance
for the navigational considerations for the new developments.
Yes
13
5.3 Grounding
Grounding
Mitigation and Enhancement Measures Potential
Effect
Existing
5.3.1 Under Keel Clearance (UKC) policy enforced, 1.0m in main
channel and 0.5m at Ro Ro berth.
Yes
5.3.2 VTS Port Control provides VHF, Radar and AIS monitoring of
all vessel movements in the Port and advice to embarked
pilots and large commercial vessels.
Yes
5.3.3 Visiting commercial ships advised of UKC policy by
publications and at Master-Pilot exchange.
Yes
5.3.4 VTS monitor commercial ships dynamic UKC using 3D system
with own ship data from AIS.
Yes
5.3.5 PHC tug assistance available on request. A memorandum of
understanding (MOU) is in place for a third party to provide
extra tugs if required. Contractors responsible for providing
tugs for their work barges during construction phase.
Yes
Proposed
5.3.6 Review of the published notice advising of the dangers of
suction from large commercial ships in the Main Channel.
Yes
5.3.7 The Pilot Boarding position would be moved to allow more
time for the Master-Pilot exchange.
Yes
5.3.8 Review procedures for readiness. Yes
5.3.9 Review the day marks and transit marks following the
proposed dredging and to ensure adequate visual references
from Little Channel.
Yes
Recommended
5.3.10 Review PHC Controlled Vessel procedure for manoeuvring
larger vessels in the vicinity of South Quay. This should allow
for the reduction in navigable waters and changes in tidal
flow. Consideration should be given to maximum allowable
wind speeds and tidal strength and clear guidance available to
visiting ships, Pilots and VTS.
Yes
5.3.11 Review current capacity of the Port tugs in consideration of
the increase in size of vessels and possible changes to tidal
effect.
Yes
14
5.4 Other Categories
5.4.1 Navigational mitigation and enhancement measures for the following categories have
been included in Collision, Grounding and Contact:-
Near Miss;
Fire/Explosion;
Pollution;
Machinery Failure;
Capsize/Listing; and
Other on board incidents.
15
6. RESIDUAL SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS
6.0.1 For the purpose of this NRA, a residual significant impact is defined as an impact likely
to occur following adoption of the identified mitigation and enhancement measures.
6.0.2 The significance of the impact is assessed based on a combination of severity of the
impact occurring and the likelihood of the occurrence.
6.0.3 The proposed developments would not result in any residual significant impact for
vessel collision, contact or grounding provided the identified mitigation and
enhancement measures are successfully implemented.
6.1 Collision
6.1.1 The increased number of larger commercial ships and construction craft may slightly
increase the severity and likelihood of collision. The effective implementation of the
identified proposed and recommended mitigation and enhancement measures of the
proposed developments would make the occurrence of a collision highly unlikely. This
would include PHC management controls in addition to the proposed design and
construction of mitigation measures.
6.2 Contact
6.2.1 The severity and likelihood of contact may increase with the proposed developments
as there would be structures in place which at present do not exist. The effective
implementation of the identified proposed and recommended mitigation and
enhancement measures of the proposed developments would make the occurrence of
contact highly unlikely. This would include PHC management controls in addition to
the proposed design and construction of mitigation measures.
6.3 Grounding
6.3.1 The severity and likelihood of grounding may increase with the proposed
developments as there would be deeper draft commercial vessels operating in the Port
than at present. The effective implementation of the identified proposed and
recommended mitigation and enhancement measures of the proposed developments
would make the occurrence of grounding highly unlikely. PHC management controls
in addition to the proposed design and construction of mitigation measures.
16
7. SUMMARY OF POTENTIAL IMPACTS
Receptor Impact Nature of
impact
Impact
before
mitigation
significant?
Explanation of significance Mitigation and
enhancement measures
Is the residual
impact
significant
D/I P/
T
+/- Yes No Yes
(+/-)
No
Construction Phase
All craft Collision
D T - Yes Increased size and frequency
of commercial vessels
Reduced passing room
Construction barges
Harbour Control – VTS
Pilotage
Exclusion zones
Escort vessels
Regulatory Speed limits
Enforcement patrol
No
All craft Contact
D T - Yes Contact with new structures
during manoeuvring
Contact with temporary
structure
Harbour Control – VTS
Pilotage
Review manoeuvring
Fendering and
illumination
Port information and pilot
support
No
All craft Groundin
g
D T - Yes Increased size of vessels
would reduce under keel
clearance
Increased size of vessels
would increase suction effect
Grounding on underwater
obstructions during
construction
Harbour Control – VTS
Under Keel Clearance
(UKC) policy enforced
VTS monitor dynamic UKC
Pilotage, boarding
position moved
Review manoeuvring
Day marks
No
17
Receptor Impact Nature of
impact
Impact
before
mitigation
significant?
Explanation of significance Mitigation and
enhancement measures
Is the residual
impact
significant
D/I P/
T
+/- Yes No Yes
(+/-)
No
Size of vessel exceed
tug/towing capability
Review of tug capacity
Operational Phase
All craft Collision
D P - Yes Increased size and frequency
of commercial vessels
Reduced passing room
Harbour Control – VTS
Pilotage
Exclusion zones
Escort vessels
Regulatory Speed limits
Enforcement patrol
No
All craft Contact
D P - Yes Contact with new structures
during manoeuvring
Harbour Control – VTS
Pilotage
Review manoeuvring
Fendering and
illumination
Port information and pilot
support
No
All craft Grounding
D P - Yes Increased size of vessels
would reduce under keel
clearance
Increased size of vessels
would increase suction effect
Size of vessel exceed
tug/towing capability
Harbour Control – VTS
Under Keel Clearance
(UKC) policy enforced
VTS monitor dynamic UKC
Pilotage, boarding
position moved
Day marks
Review of tug capacity
No
D = Direct, I = Indirect, P = Permanent, T = Temporary, + = Beneficial, - = Adverse
18
8. LIMITATIONS AND ASSUMPTIONS
8.0.1 The NRA is based on the information gained from consultation with PHC, site visits
and review of documents as listed in Section 3. This information was made readily
available by PHC and all requests for assistance were positively received. Any further
information made available after the date of writing the NRA report has not been
included.
8.0.2 All assumptions have been avoided by basing statements on facts gained during
consultation with PHC, site visits and review of documents as listed in Section 3.
9. CONCLUSION
9.0.1 The NRA assessed the navigational impacts of the proposed developments. This was
achieved through consultation with PHC, site visits and review of documentation. The
process identified potential impacts and mitigation measures including proposed and
recommend measures.
9.0.2 The successful implementation of the proposed and recommended mitigation
measures would reduce the probability of the identified impacts to highly unlikely.
This level of probability would result in no residual significant impact for the safety of
navigation during the construction or operational phase of the proposed
developments.
HCL Report Number 054140114v9
FIGURES FIGURE 1 SITE LOCATION PLAN
FIGURE 2 EXISTING SITE LAYOUT FIGURE 3 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENTS
Site Location Plan
Prepared ByCL
Client
Project Title
Figure Title
Figure No.
Tel: 023 8081 7500Fax: 023 8081 7600
Revision2
Harbours Act 1964 (as amended) The Poole Harbour Revision (Works) Order 2014
61019463Project Number
1
Date 11/02/14
¯
Poole Harbour Commissioners
Reproduced from OS map data by permission of the Ordnance Survey. Licence No: 1000487490 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000
m
© Crown copyright and database rights 2014 Ordnance Survey 0100031673
0 0.85 1.70.425Kilometers
Ü
LegendExtent of Proposed WorksArea Shown in Main Map
Existing Site Layout
Prepared ByCL
Client
Project Title
Figure Title
Figure No.
Tel: 023 8081 7500Fax: 023 8081 7600
Revision3
Harbours Act 1964 (as amended) The Poole Harbour Revision (Works) Order 2014
61019463Project Number
2
Date 31/03/13
¯
Poole Harbour Commissioners
Reproduced from OS map data by permission of the Ordnance Survey. Licence No: 1000487490 120 240 360 480
m
LegendExtent of Proposed WorksPort Estate Boundary
Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database right 2014
0 80 160 24040Meters
Ü
Cargo Handling
Ro-Ro Freight
Cargo Handling
Ferry CarLanes Car Park
Poole YachtClub
Port of Poole Marina
BulwarkQuay
Poole Quay Boat Haven
Ro-Ro Berths
Jetty
NoteDetails of the Proposed Works are shown in Figure 3
Proposed Developments
Prepared ByMJC/CL
Client
Project Title
Figure Title
Figure No.
Tel: 023 8081 7500Fax: 023 8081 7600
Revision2
Harbours Act 1964 (as amended) The Poole Harbour Revision (Works) Order 2014
61019463Project Number
3
Date 12/02/14
¯
Poole Harbour Commissioners
LegendPort Estate BoundaryLimit of Dredge AssessedExtent of Proposed WorksExtent of Proposed Quay
HRO Development Phases1 Construction1 Dredge2 Construction2 Dredge3 Construction3 Dredge4 Construction5 Construction5 Dredge
Ü0 50 100 15025
MetersContains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database right 2014
Port of PooleMarina
New Quay
Bulwark Quay
Ballast Quay
Poole QuayBoat Haven