FSC
High Intensity Laser and Energetic Particle – Matter Interactions
Chuang Ren University of Rochester
Workshop on Scientific Opportunities in HEDLPAugust 26, 2008, Washington DC
FSC
• Acknowledgement– J. Tonge & W. Mori (UCLA); L. O. Silva (IST); K.
Krushelnick (Michigan); A. Friedman (LLNL/LBNL); Y. Sentoku (UNR); J. Zuego (LLE)
high intensity
High energy content
FSC
Introduction
• New laser/beam sources can explore new applications and fundamental physics problems
• Realizing these opportunities requires understanding in high intensity laser- and energetic particle-matter interactions– Ultra short pulse – plasma interaction (PWFA, new radiation
sources, QED, …)– kJ short pulse – relativistic plasmas interactions (FI,
collisionless shocks, proton accelerations…)– Energetic particle – matter interactions (FI, HIF, ….)
• Long-term healthy growth of the HEDLP field needs both curiosity-driven and application-driven research– Attract and retain new talents
Research program has put ultra short-pulse laser and beam physics at the Forefront of Science
Acceleration, Radiation Sources, Refraction, Medical Applications
Plasma Wakefield Accelerators Is a Major Driver behind the Field Plasma Wakefield Accelerators Is a Major Driver behind the Field of Ultra of Ultra SShort-Pulse Laser and Beam – Plasma Interactions
• Plasma ion channel exerts restoring force => space charge oscillations•Immobile ions & relativistic ‘cold’ electrons •Synchrotron radiation
Blowout RegimeRosenzweig et al. 1990, Puhkov and Meyer-ter-vehn 2002, Lu et al, 2006 and 2007
Driven by an electron beam Driven by a laser pulse
Large wake for a laser amplitude ao=eEo/moc ~ 1 or a beam density nb~ no
Laser and beam requirements on I, , P require 100TW to PW laser and beam (such as at SLAC) facilities
One-on-One Simulations Agree with Experiment
Nature 445 741 15-Feb-2007
E-167: Energy Doubling of the 42 GeV SLAC beam in a Plasma Wakefield
Full scale three-dimensionalparticle-in-cell simulations using the code QuickPIC identified that the energy gainSaturated due to head erosion
Validation: OSIRIS simulation of LBNL Nature experiment
Excellent agreement?
Total # of electrons:
Simulation: 1.7 109
Experiment: 2x109
Central energy:
Simulation: 90 MeV
Experiment: 86
Energy spread:
Simulation: 10 MeV
Experiment: 1.8 MeV
+10 GeV in uniform plasma
•Two regimes for laser propagation:
•Self-guiding propagation regime until 10 cm
•Depletion leads to diffraction after 10 cm
•Accelerating gradient in good agreement with theory
•QuickPIC: 0.8 GeV/cm
•Theoretical: 0.6 GeV/cm
Self-guiding: stronger self-channeling
Self-guiding: stronger self-channeling
Energy chirpadjust initial beam position
Energy chirpadjust initial beam position
@ 21.7 cm
@ 5.4 cm
5.4 cm
21.7 cm
Laser spot evolutionLaser spot evolution
Spectral evolutionSpectral evolution Phase-space evolutionPhase-space evolution
Diffraction: weaker self-channeling
Diffraction: weaker self-channeling
Main resultsMain results
Setup for -ray generation and photonuclear reaction production
- is direct laser interaction with nucleus possible?
14.8 MeV 238U(,fission)
1 10 1000
Cro
ss s
ecti
on
(mba
rn)
200
150
100
50
Incident -ray energy (MeV)
Samples 12C, 63Cu, 238UHe gas2.1019 e/cm340 TW, 30 fs,
I=1019 W/cm2
Supersonic nozzle100-150 MeV e-
Laser
Ta-converter
Cross-section 3 mm 238 U
70-75% of the -radiation in the relevant energy range (6-25 MeV) is contained within a half angle of ~9 degrees with respect to the incident electron direction. (Courtesy K. Krushelnick)
S. Reed et. al. APL 2006
FSC
We have developed a systematic understanding of many LPI phenomena
• Fundamental processes such as SF & hosing are understood
• Mutual interactions btw laser beams---braided light
Braided Light, Ren et al., PRL’04
€
Pj
d2r r j
dτ 2= −
∂
∂r r j
[−kp
2
8k02
P1P2
W12 + W2
2exp(−
2d2
W12 + W2
2)]
d2 ≡ (r r 1 −
r r 2)2 = (X c1 − Xc2)2 + (Yc1 −Yc2)2, Pj ≡ A j
2W j2
FSC
Future Ultra-High Intensity Lasers Can Test Fundamental Physics Laws
• Today’s laser has I~1022 W/cm2 (Michigan)– Electron radiation damping important
• Ambitious ILE/ELI projects aim at 1025 W/cm2 in 2014– 20 PW, 1024 W/cm2 beam in 2011
• At 1023 W/cm2, the Unruh effect can be tested (radiation from an accelerated vacuum)
• The Schwinger limit: 1030 W/cm2
– Spontaneous pair creation
FSC
Upcoming kJ-class short pulses open up new LPI regimes of LPI
• Significant ion density modification• Density profiles dynamically determined
• Significant plasma heating• Relativistic electron temperatures• Laser absorption coupled to density profile evolution
• Many applications requires understanding of energetic particle – matter interactions
• Interactions with self-generated fields
FSC
Propagation of high-intensity pulses in underdense plasmas
• Intense laser – underdense plasma interactions are important to– Fast ignition– Laser – solid experiments in general
due to pre-pulses
• Intense lasers cannot propagate as linear waves– Laser self-focusing and hosing– Transverse and longitudinal
denisty modification– Propagation via ponderomotive
push
channeling/hole-boring pulse
ignition pulse
FSC
• Relativistic SF/Filament• Ponderomotive SF/Filament
– Micro channels created from laser filaments
• Central filament widening & shock launching– Laser snowplows away micron
channel walls to form a single channel
– Transverse expansion through high-mach-number shocks
• Vt~0.03c ~2Cs (at 500 keV)• Channel wider than laser width
– Laser hosing/channel branching seen
Stages of channeling process
Ela
ser
ni
FSC
A preformed channel significantly improves the transmission of the ignition pulse
• The residual plasma is heated to relativistic temperatures– <>~12– Reduced nonlinear
interactions
0.0001
0.001
0.01
0.1
1
0 3 6 9 12
Pout/Pin
Time(ps)
10 2̂0W/cm2 with a T=6.5Mev
channel10 1̂9W/cm2 with a T=6.5Mev
channel
10 2̂0W/cm2 without a channel
10 1̂9W/cm2 without a channel
10 1̂9W/cm2 with a T=5kev
10 1̂9W/cm2 with a T=1kev
FSC
LPI in Relativistic Plasmas Is a New Research Area
• Macro-size HEDLP plasmas (1 Gbar)• Relativistic pressure reduce electron
quiver momentum– Vosc/c=anp/ϒ(e+p) [Tzeng & Mori, prl’98]
• LPI needs to be studied in this new regime– SF & hosing
• Coupling with IAW, not EPW
Intense laser-overdense plasma interactions
X2
130µ
X1150µ
51µ41µ 20µ
laser
Flux diagnostic planes
44 0.8
• Isolated boundaries- we believe this is essential
– 100 nc Plasma
• 20 radius resistive core – particle drag Force = -k p -2 – passes low and high energy particles
(<50KeV, >10MeV)
• Box size 150 x130 – 5x108 cell – Grid size: 0.05 c/0 , 0.5 c/ p
– 4 electrons per cell, 109 particles– Te = 1.0 keV, mI= 3672me
• Duration 2.5ps +– 9104 time steps– 1 - 2 months real time
• 1-laser, W0 = 20 – Spot size matches core
High Intensity Laser DeliversPower to Core more Efficiently
Laser Intensity8x1020 W/cm2
2x1020 W/cm2
5x1019 W/cm2
8x1020 W/cm2 laser delivers:5x the Power of 2x1020 W/cm2 laser 50x the Power of 5x1019 W/cm2 laser
ScaledTo LaserIntensity
~ 50x
~ 10x
Net Electron Energy Flux Spectrum Peaks at Low Energy*
Through plane 0.8 m in front of core
Intensity8x1020 W/cm2
2x1020 W/cm2
5x1019 W/cm2
MeV
Scaled to laser power @ 2.5 ps
.25 MeV
.9 MeV
2.6 MeV
*compared to ponderomotivescaling
P1 (mec)
P2
(mec)
Energy is Transported in Hot Bulk
Distribution at 1.5 ps
TailHot Bulk
F (log(n))
P1 (mec)
laser
Sample Region
Peaks at -0.1 mec
80% - 90% of NET energy flux
0 10
6
-6-6
-10 200
Magnetic Filamentation and Formation of Shocks
• Weibel instability relaxes anisotropic particle distributions as well as filamenting currents.
• Magnetic fields reach over 100MG for high laser intensity runs - channeling usable 2 MeV energy electrons in x1 direction.
8x1020 W/cm2 @ 1 ps
Dynamics in the front surface of the Dynamics in the front surface of the targettargetDynamics in the front surface of the Dynamics in the front surface of the targettarget
Mass build up/compression & strong electric Mass build up/compression & strong electric fieldfieldFilamentation @ targetFilamentation @ target
t ~ 350 fs
Weibel instability
Return current
L. O. Silva | August 2008
L. O. Silva | August 2008
Electron dynamics different @ higher Electron dynamics different @ higher intensitiesintensitiesElectron dynamics different @ higher Electron dynamics different @ higher intensitiesintensities
II 00 =
5
x1
0 =
5
x1
021
21 W
/cm
W/c
m22 I
I 00
= 1
.25
x1
0 =
1.2
5x1
019
19 W
/cm
W/c
m22
return current e-
trapped e-
accelerated e-
e- from target front
accelerated e-
particle tracking
L. O. Silva | August 2008
L. O. Silva | August 2008
FSC
Magnetic fields play the same role in the formation of laser-driven and relativistic shocks in GRB’s
• GRB afterglow requires magnetic fields– Weibel instabilities from colliding shells can provide
the B-field• PIC simulations of relativistic collisionless shocks
(Spitkovsky ‘08,γ~15) show the same importance of the B-field
• The key is to understand up- and down-stream particle distribution– Nonlinear evolution of current-driven instabilities
FSC
• Understanding energy loss of heavy ions in matter– Loss to free e- understood– Difficulty is in calculating loss to bound e- with self-
consistent state (due to heating and collective effects)
– These effects tend to increase energy loss rate– Fusion only involves fixed charge-state particles
• Atomic physics is also important in laser-cone interactions
Ack: A. Friedman
FSC
• Priority: LPI in plasmas of relativistic temperatures– Important to FI, lab astrophysics and basic science
• Laser absorption in self-consistent density profiles• Particle transport in self-generated fields
– Availability of kJ short pulse facilities– Peta-scale simulation capabilities to understand
experiments• 3D PIC simulations of 200×100×100 μm3 need 4 trillion cells
and a month on a peta-flop machine