NATIONAL INITIATIVE 2016-17 TOPIC SELECTION WEBINAR
November 17, 2015
Canadian ICU Collaborative Faculty
Denny Laporta, MC, FRCPC
Claudio Martin, MD, FRCPC
Yoanna Skrobik, MD, FRCPC
Paule Bernier, Dt.P., M.Sc.
John Muscedere, MD, FRCPC
Cathy Mawdsley, RN, M.Sc.
Bruce Harries, Improvement Associates
Leanne Couves, Improvement Associates
Carla Williams, CPSI
Ardis Eliason, Improvement Associates
ICU Faculty Those who expressed interest in
participating (via survey) Others
Welcome!
3
4
Who’s Online? Qui est en ligne?POINTER
What professions are represented?Quelles professions sont représentées?
Nurse MD
Educator / Quality Improvement Professional
Infection Control
Administrator / Senior Leader
Other
POINTER
RespiratoryTherapist
Nutritionist
5
Summary of Survey Results Context and Approach Potential Topic 1: End of Life Care Potential Topic 2: Pain, Agitation,
Delirium (PAD) Decision Next Steps
Today’s Agenda
6
Summary of Survey Results
7
Which topics would you rate as your top THREE choices that your ICU would be interested and committed to working on in 2016-17?n=85
1st Choice 2nd Choice 3rd Choice(weight = 9) (weight =3) (weight =1)
Nutrition 8 8 23 39 119Pain, Agitation & Delirium 33 26 10 69 385Sepsis 14 12 16 42 178End of Life Care 24 22 13 59 295Med Rec 2 8 8 18 50VAP 2 8 10 20 52Pneumothorax 0 1 1 2 4
Total Weighted
et pour lesquels elle serait prête à s'engager en 2016-17?n=8
1st Choice 2nd Choice 3rd Choice(weight = 9) (weight =3) (weight =1)
Nutrition 0 1 0 1 3Pain, Agitation & Delirium 2 2 3 7 27Sepsis 2 1 1 4 22End of Life Care 4 3 1 8 46Med Rec 0 1 3 4 6VAP 0 0 0 0 0Pneumothorax 0 0 0 0 0
Total Weighted
Veuillez indiquer quels seraient vos trois (3) sujets préférés et sur lesquels votre USI aimerait travailler
Q1: Comments (Potential Topics)
8
Q2: What issues and challenges in your ICU keep you awake at night?
9
Q3: What opportunities keep you coming back to work each day?
11/17/2015
10Canadian ICU Collaborative
POTENTIAL TOPIC 1: END OF LIFE CARE IN THE ICU
Dr. Claudio MartinCathy Mawdsley
End of Life Care Across the ICU Continuum
ICU AdmissionICU Trajectory“Cure vs Care”
End of Life Care or ICU Discharge
Patient and Family Experience
12
Communicating & Understanding Patients and Families Across the Continuum
ICU Admission
• Conversations prior to admission• High risk• Frequent
readmissions• Targeted sources
of admissions
• Initial discussions about patient values and wishes
ICU Trajectory
• Trigger of when “cure changes to care”
• Learning about the patient values
• Separating update meetings from the process of Goals of Care
• Offering treatment plans mirroring patient values and wishes
• Team consensus
EOL Care or ICU Discharge
• Standardized protocols
• Individualizing EOLC as per patient values
• Higher PTS scores after death
13
Accreditation Canada
• Complete and accurate information is shared with the client and family in a timely way, in accordance with the client's desire to be involved
• The team verifies that the client and family understand information provided about their care
2.1. Engage patients or substitute decision-makers in a discussion of risks and benefits of investigations and treatments to obtain informed consent
14
Some of the evidence
Time-Limited Trials of Intensive Care for Critically Ill Patients With CancerHow Long Is Long Enough?
Association of Intensive Care Unit Admission With Mortality Among Older Patients With Pneumonia
Alignment of Do-Not-Resuscitate Status With Patients’ Likelihood of Favorable Neurological Survival After In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
15
Some review of evidence
Canadian Critical Care Society Guidelines for the Withdrawal of Life Sustaining Measures
Withholding or Withdrawing Life Sustaining Therapy: The Canadian Critical Care Society Position Paper
Choosing Wisely Canada Campaign– Organ donation (missed opportunity = lives lost)– Goals of care for patients with progressive and
untreatable end-stage or terminal illness
16
Some of the evidence
17
How are we doing?
18
How are we doing?
19
How are we doing?
20
Why this topic? Why now?
Examples of harm through poor communication: Mismatch between preferences and actual care
– Information and Consent Language of ICU Team can make things worse
• Despite best intentions – “want vs choose” (Schwarze et al., 2015)
• Science to framing discussions (Downar et al, 2010)
• ACP – interpreted differently between family and ICU team (Leder, 2015)
Moral distress for staff Post ICU Syndrome with families
• Depression and PTSD• Influenced by coping style and patient outcome
21
Why not this topic?
- Scope- Is this a patient safety issue?- Where on the continuum do you fit?
- Emotion and value laden topic- Resources required to change culture
and systems around communication, treatment and consent processes
- Ethics consultation
23
POTENTIAL TOPIC 2: PAIN, AGITATION AND DELIRIUM
Dr. Yoanna Skrobik
Consistent pain assessment paired with pain-assessment analgesic management improves ICU LOS, MV duration outcomes
Less drug and more ‘range’ adapt to individual patient needs
Sedation titration is key in minimizing LOS and MV complications, and may be associated with mortality
Sedating patients for sleep or asynchrony is ineffective
Delirium screening is important for patient reassurance and management choices (mobility, dexmedetomidine)
Review of the evidence
25
How are we doing?
In ICUs across Canada systematic assessment and management protocols vary, as does caregiver buy-in (as low as 40%)
There are predictable ‘winner’ combinations to make it work
Implementation with the collaborative allows tangible tracking of success
26
Why this topic? Why now?
Because of the experience and lessons learned from doing it over the last 10 years
More and more metrics to suggest that addressing PAD also enables mobility and sleep, the two determinants of physical and mental health for survivors
There are novel ways to engage families in this patient care dimension (particularly with delirium)
27
The only reason why not is the overwhelming amount of ‘bundles’ and evidence-driven practice we are expected to integrate… so perhaps a resigned view of impotence when faced with challenge would be appropriate
Why not this topic?
28
DECISION
Raise your hand if you agree with the following statement
“I like WebEx webinars”
Practice Question
30
Our ICU would be willing to commit to working on improvement of _______ in
2016-2017
PICK ONE: Raise Hand
31
Call to Action Enrolment Process First virtual Learning Session in late
January / early February
Next Steps
32
THANK YOU MERCI