-
8/19/2019 Ivan Velazco Castellano, A205 056 436 (BIA March 8, 2016)
1/14
Hilts, Murray David
U.S Department of Justice
Executive Oce r Immgration Reew
Board of Immigraton ApealsOce of he Cerk
5107 Leesburg Pike. Sut 2000Fl Chrc Vgma 22041
LAW OFFICES OF MURRAY D. LTS3020 Meade venue
DHS/CE Office of Chie Counsel - SND880 Fron S. Room 2246San Diego A 921018834
San Diego CA, C 92116
Name: VELAZC CASTELANO, VAN A 205-056436
Date of this notice 3/8/2016
ncosed s a copy of the Boad's decson and order n the aboe-rerenced cae.
cosure
Panel Members:Wdtd, Lid S.uy, RogO'Ho, g
Sincerel,
DO CDonna Car
Ch Cek
Usea Dock
For more unpublished BIA decisions, visitwww.irac.net/unpublished/index/
I m m i g r a n t & R e f
u g e e A p p e l l a t e C e n
t e r , L L C| w w w . i r a c . n e t
Cite as: Ivan Velazco Castellano, A205 056 436 (BIA March 8, 2016)
-
8/19/2019 Ivan Velazco Castellano, A205 056 436 (BIA March 8, 2016)
2/14
I�'
Executive Oce r Iiation Review
Decision of e Bord of Iiion Appeals
Fas Chrc, Virgna 22041
File: A205 056 436 S Diego, CA
I re IV A VELCO CASTLLANO
MOVAL PROCEEDGS
APPEAL
Date:
O BEHALF OF SPONDN Mura D Hils, Esquie
CHARGE:
MAR - 8 2016
oie: Se 22a(6(A)(i), I& Ac [8 USC § l 82a(6)(A(i)] - Present withou beig admited or parole
PPLCATO: Moion to suppress; teinio
The respondet appeals om he Imiaio Judge's Deeber 6, 203, deision ig him removable as harge and grig m volu epue der so 20Bb of emigration Naionalit Ac, 8 U.SC 229b he record will be remande
Uer 8 C.F.R § 1003.l d)), e Bo ders to au gs nless the are learleoneous, but i ods e novo review of ll remaiing isses iludig estio of lawjden d disreio
The Noie o Appea Fom -862 (A) aleges hat te respondet is ot a itize ornatioal of e nte Stes d ha he is a native ad itizen of Mexio, d hges him wthinadissibili er setion 22a6A(i of the At, 8 S.C. 1182(a)(Ai, s alien preset i te Unit Stes wiout adission or pole (J at 1; Ex ) I suppo of eallegatios d hage, t Dpamet of Homeland Seuri DHS le a Reor ofDepoable/Inmissible Ali Fo I-21 as evidece of ieage d removabili (. a 2xh. .
h respondent ed a motion o suppress evidee (i piclar, the Fo I213 th NTA) d to termnae proeeings with te mmigratio Judge, ging tat the DHS'sevidece w obained in violatio of te Fouh Amedmet o the U. Constition J. at 2;Exh 10) The HS led a brief opposig the respodent's motio to sppress d alsosbmig onion ppotng o b epnden eviene o iag xh. ab ).e Immigraion Judge nied h respodens motion to suppress ad erminate proceedings,sstined he hge of removabiliy and h respoden's rees r voldepte w eae order of remov o Mexio (J a 8; Ex. 2).
In swo laios sbmite w his moon, he responet d is ie sate at onor abou Apil 25 2012 crossed a sreet at a sop si on o and were approahed b a police ocer who idiated tha he sopped them beae h respode d his ie i noallow a vehile o pss hrogh he intersetio bere te entered IJ. at 2; Exh 0 Tabs AB)
I m m i g r a n t & R e f
u g e e A p p e l l a t e C e n
t e r , L L C| w w w . i r a c . n e t
Cite as: Ivan Velazco Castellano, A205 056 436 (BIA March 8, 2016)
-
8/19/2019 Ivan Velazco Castellano, A205 056 436 (BIA March 8, 2016)
3/14
205 056 436
Acoding to the declaations, the police oce asked the espondent if he a gg membed ked is idencation .J 4-5; Ex 0, Tab A T espodet d his iende se that immigration oce ived on the scene, tled to the espondent, d too
him into custody I.J. at 2; Exh. 10, Tabs -B).
Wen a espondent challenges the legality of evidene, he o se beas e buden ofestalishing a pima cie case that the DHS's evidence was unllly obtained bee ebuden will shi to the DHS to justi the me in whic it obtaied the evidence. Mater oBarcen 19 &N De 609, 611 BIA 1988); Mater o Ramirez-Sanchez, 17 &N Dec. 503,505 BIA 1980). It is well-established th the exlusionay ule is genealy not applicable indeportion o emoval poceedings. INS Loez-Mendoza 468 U.S. 1032, 1038 1984); salso Mater of Sandova, 17 I&N Dec. 70, 77-83 BIA 1979). Te exlusionay ule ose in econtext of ciminal poceedings and equies te suppession in s poceedings of evidence
that is the it of an nl est, o of oe oci conduct which violates the FouAenment. Howeve, in / Loez-Mndoza sura, the Supeme Cou le open the possibility at the exclusiony ule might also appl in imion poceedings involving
egegious violations of Fou Amendment o othe libeties that might ansess notionsof menta ess d ndeine the pobative value of the evidence obtained." INS LoMndoza, sura at 050-51 Sbsequently, the Ni Cicuit specically held that theexlusion ue sometimes does appl in immigon poceedings, to he extent of equiing
te exclusion of evidene that has been otained as e esult of a delibeate violon of teFo mendment, o as the eslt of conduct th a easonable oce shoud he known is in violation of e Constiton. See Lope-Rodrie . Muksey, 56 F.3d 1012, 018 (9t Ci.2008), reh 'g e ba denied su nom. Lope-Rodriguz v Hoder, 560 F.3d 1098 9t Ci.2009); Orhorhaghe v INS 8 F.3d 488, 501 9 Ci. 1994)
In his motion d on appeal, the espondent contends t e stop was initiated bed on sethnic appeane Resp. . at 6-7; Resp. Mot. at 7). S Gones-Rivra v , 22 F.3d 1441,1446, 1450-52 9 Ci. 1994) holding at an agent commited eegious FourAendment violation when he stopped an alien's vehicle based solely on e aien's Hispanicappece).
We conclude that a emand is appopiate he ct-ndig d analysis egding thebasis e espondent's stop d seizue d to give e espondent an oppounity to develop the ecod as to the alegations of egegious" conduct. In nding insucient evidence at thestop was based on the espondent's enic appece, e iation Judge appes to haveelied pincipal on what the espondent indicated e police oce told him egading theeons te stop amely that the espondent and s iend did not allow a ca to pass ough
the iesection pio to cossing the seet) d the ct at e espondent's end was told secould leave .J. at 2-5). The igion Judge also und at e Fo -213 indicates th the police oe made contact wh the espondent he esult o a ote ado cal eging asuspicios peson" ad that the police oce ecogized the espondent as a gang membe.Howeve, thee ae no ndings of act egading wy te espondent was deteed to besuspicious, whee the oe ecogized the espondent as a gg membe at the me of estop, o how y such membeship would aise a easonable suspicion of ull iiationst .J. at 5 xh. 3 ).
2
I m m i g r a n t & R e f u g e e A p p e l l a t e C e n
t e r , L L C| w w w . i r a c . n e t
Cite as: Ivan Velazco Castellano, A205 056 436 (BIA March 8, 2016)
-
8/19/2019 Ivan Velazco Castellano, A205 056 436 (BIA March 8, 2016)
4/14
A205 056 436
Ule Gonzales-Rivera v INS, supra, d horhaghe v INS, supra, t polce ocerdd ot test regdg e decso to stop te respodet. Fer, eve f te stop tself was
vald, te Imo Jdge dd ot addess weer polce or HS ocers ad scetaclale as r sseey eectg a seze, d e sold do so o read. Seesecto 287()(2) of te Act; see also Orhorhae v. INS, supra, at 497 (explaig at to js te seze, get mst tclate ojectve cts provdg reasoale sspco t[e sbject of the seize] was a e llegally s couy."), qotg Benitez-Menez v.IS, 760 F.2d 907, 909 (9t Cr. 95); cf Martinez-Medina v Holder, 673 F.3d 029, 037(9t Cr. 20) (dg o eregos volato were ser ew t ales were lawlly preset e Uted Ses y vrte of er acknowledget at the me he seized e).
We ote t the record cots a Defeed Acto r Cldood Arrvs (DACA)pplco ad a U.S. Vst prtot (I.J. at 2; Exs. 6, -A). I ts opposto to therespodet's moto to sppress d teate proceedngs e HS oered e U.S Vst prtot as poredly depedet evdece" of e respodets leage (E. 1 at 4). SeeI v Lopez-Mendoza, 468 U.S. 032, 039 (1984) (oldg that e body or dety of adefedt or respodet criial or cvl proceedgs s ever tself spressble as a t of ll aest, eve f t s coceded tat a ulawl rest, seac, or errogatoocced."); see also Maer of Cervantes-Torres, 2 I& Dec. 35, 353 (BIA 996) ([O]ce e respodet as ee plced deporo proceedgs, ay evdece whch s depedetlyobted may be reled po, regardless of te lleged llegl arest.").
O appeal, e respodet ppes to arge tat s DACA applcato was ot properlytetcated uder the Federal Rles of Evdece d terere cot sppor a teatvedg of depedet evdece of aleage (Resp. Br. at 4; Ex. 6). Te Io Jdge ddot ct me alteatve dng regadg depedet evdece of alege hs oradecso, d e shold cosder ts isse o red. To the extet te respode ges ore roadly tat hs DACA pplcato w mpropely admted, he sted a coutesy copy" ofs DACA applcto to evdece (Tr. t 8-9, 3; x. 6). Fer, ato proceedgs, e sole test r adsso of evdece s weter te evdece s prove d tsdmsso s detlly r." Matter of D-R-, 25 I&N Dec. 445, 458 (BIA 20). TheFederal Rles of Evdece e ot dng mgrtio proceedgs ad Iio Jdges ve broad dscreo to admt d cosder relevat d proatve evdece." (tectatos omtted); see also Matter of Velasquez, 9 &N Dec. 377, 380 (BIA 1986)([D]ocetary evdece deporo proceedgs eed ot copor wt the sct dcalrles of evdece"). Therere, we d o eor by te Imato Jdge i adtng teDACA applcto to evdece. Accordgly, te llowg order wll be etered.
ODER: Te record s remded to e gro Co r er poceedgscosstet w e reog opno a r the e o a ew ecso.
3
I m m i r a n t & R e f u
e e A p p e l l a t e C e n
t e r , L L C| w w w . i r a c . n e t
Cite as: Ivan Velazco Castellano, A205 056 436 (BIA March 8, 2016)
-
8/19/2019 Ivan Velazco Castellano, A205 056 436 (BIA March 8, 2016)
5/14
U.S Depament of JusceExiv O r Iigi Riw
Fals Chuc Vgnia 22041
Fil: A205 056 436 - S igo CA
In re IVAN VELAZO ASTELLANO
DSENTG OPION Roger A. Pauly
i h Bd Ii Al
Da M AR - 8 2016
I rspecly issent would a Immon Jug's conclusion tha responen o staish a prim cie grgious violation of e Fou Anme. Fuermore eresponen's DAA application whch he sumite r rcor n of wch we cn taknisv notice see 8 .FR. § 100.(d)((iv, provids an inepnent o resblishng his linage See Tr. a 24.
Wt r
I m m i r a n t & R e f u e e A p p e l l a t e C e
n t e r , L L C| w w w . i r a c . n e t
Cite as: Ivan Velazco Castellano, A205 056 436 (BIA March 8, 2016) (Pauley, dissenting)
-
8/19/2019 Ivan Velazco Castellano, A205 056 436 (BIA March 8, 2016)
6/14
UID STAS DPARTMN OF JSICXECIV OFFIC FOR IMIGRAION REVW
UITD STATS IMMIGRAIO CORSAN DIO CAIFORNIA
Fe: A205-056436
In the Mate of
VA VAZCO CSTELLANO
RESPOND
))
))
Decembe 6 203
IN OVL PROCDNGS
CARGES Secton 12(a)(6)A)(i) o th Imigratio & Natonlity Ac
APPLCIOS ermiion; oluntry parre t coclusio o pocings
O BAF OF ESPODENT URAY D. HILS3020 Mea AeuSan Diego, Clior 92116
ON BHALF OF HS RHANA ISIOOSa Dego Calonia
OAL DECISION OF H IMIGRAIO JDG
Te Cot as jrsdictio i s cas y h Govret's ilig o
oce to ppear ated Aprl 25 202 wch lecs tha it was persoally sed o
he respodet o een dat Drng thes poceedgs te Cout nos that th
respondet has been repeseted y curent counsel, and through counse deied al
allegations and te cag ude Scio 22a)6)(A)() o the Imigaton & tonliy
ct
id\%!&¥ Ml. ¥ �P& m : _
I m m i g r a n t & R e
f u g e e A p p e l l a t e C e
n t e r , L L C| w w w . i r
a c . n e t
-
8/19/2019 Ivan Velazco Castellano, A205 056 436 (BIA March 8, 2016)
7/14
Te respondent was also proved a opportuty to e or prosecutoral
dscretio and a applcation o eferre adudicaton fr cildood arrivals coonl
reerred as DACA but bot were denied by the Deparent of Hoeland Securty
At te earin on August 28 202 te overnmet iled for -23 based
upo respondent's denial o all te alleatons and carge The respodet initialy did
ot ile ay objectio or otions in relation to te Governmet's evidence Te Cour
deeed that te respondent had abanone suc callenge an adtte te for -
213 ino te recor Te Court notes tat te respondent, tro counsel filed a late
oton for leave to file is otons to suppress an terinate and obection to te
Governets evdence Because te overnets response dd not aress
respondent's motion or leave at te earin on Deceber 6, 2013 te Court ranted
the respodets oton or � l l tose otions sua spote
In support of s otions to suppress and terinate ad is obectons to
te overents eviece, te respondet iled sworn declarations o isel a friend
ad is counsel of record (wt regard to te otio or leave to file) Respondent and
his frie clai tat on or about Aprl 25 202 after tey alleedly lawfully crossed a
street at a stop si tey were stopped by a Carlsba police alleedly for not allowi
a car to pass through te intersecton prior to etering ad crossin te street Their
declaration furter indcates tat ater an iratio ofcer arrved and taled with the
respondent, e was take ito Iigration custody
In this case te respodet troug his counsel dened all alleatons
and care The overnent as te itial burde to establis tat te respondent is
an alien tereore subject to tese proceedings See Woob v INS, 385 US 276
(1966). Te, or a care of reovability pursuant to Section 212a)6)A)(i) o te
Iiraton & Natonalty Act te respondent ust prove eiter tat he as clear and
A205056-436 2 Deceber 6, 203
I m m i r a n t & R e f u
e e A p p e l l a t e C e n
t e r , L L C| w w w . i r a c . n e t
-
8/19/2019 Ivan Velazco Castellano, A205 056 436 (BIA March 8, 2016)
8/14
conincing eidnc ha he s lawfully admted n he Uned Saes, o he is
clearly and beyod a do eied o e admed no e Ued Saes and s no
nadmssibe as chaged See 8 CF.R. 1240c)
NS . LoezMedoa 468 .S. 032 (1984) e Seme Co has
focsed decly on he admssibl o eiece esalshng idey n a case a
legal alien ojeced o his deoaon hearig solely on he gnd a he ad bee
aresed legaly ha is b INS ages k a "waa o searc he
premses [were Lope-Mendoza was arehended] o o ares ay of s occupas
The Seme Cou ha case reeced Loe-edoas agumens sag: The
body o ideny o a defenda or esoden in ciial o ci pceedigs is neer
iself suppressie as f o awul aes een i s conceded ha an awfl
ares seac or ierogaon occed" a 139 essece he Sureme Cou
declnd o hold ha he conseqeces o a ilega aes seach, o ierogaio s o
le he defedan go ee becase of he unlaess of e ares seach or
errogaon. Insead oeMendoa esalsed a a dfenda incldg s
deny s opely eore a cou in a cimnal o cil rocedng dese he iiial
llegal police acio he Nh Cici Co of Aeals has cossenly held ha
edence coceing he idey o a defendan oaned ae a legal police acon, is
o sessile as fr of he poisoos ee. US v. Garca-Beran 443 F3d 126
(9h Cr 206
n hs case, esondens eidece ais o esalis ay ouaendme iolaon we e was sopped by he Calsad police is declaaio and
s fen's decaaon ot dcae a afe hey cossed Erea Place fom
Basswood Aenue, a olice oce aoached hem. hee s no evidece a he
sop was naed ased upon he Hisac apeaance According o hs fed Ms
A20556-436 3 Dceme 6 2013
- i£e. · JQr C 4. . ... tQ ..... %@k:�®M
I m m i g r a n t & R e
f u g e e A p p e l l a t e C e
n t e r , L L C| w w w . i r
a c . n e t
-
8/19/2019 Ivan Velazco Castellano, A205 056 436 (BIA March 8, 2016)
9/14
Patoja's declaatio the police appoached them ad tod he she cold leave if she
wated to The Co ids that the espodets moto fails to distigish the case
eee espondent ad Ms Patoja ad that Ms Patoja was allowed to leave t the
police appaetly wated to qestio the espodet Athough Ms. Patojas
declaatio idcates that she s a Uted States ctize thee s no evidece peseted
that the polce ofce kew she was a Uited States citize ad theeoe wold ot
qestio he ad did ot qestion he he evidece peseted ndemnes any clam
that the stop elates to thei stats i the ited States o ay claim that it was ased
solely o the ethic appeaance
The evidece peseted also ails to estalish that the ccmstaces as
descied was not a cosesal ecote As aged by the Govement the
evidece idcates nstead, a cosesal ecote y the poice Thee is no
evidece o oce hostle eviomet o theats made o sed dg ths ecote
with the Calsad polce Accodig to the espodet's declaation this police ofice
stopped him fo cssig a steet wthot allowig a ca to ist pass thogh thetesectio po to eteig" it Fthe the poice qestioned the espondet whethe
he was a gag meme efoe poceedig to ask him fo his idetifcatio Althogh the
espodet may disagee with the oice qestiog him thee is o evidece that the
oce's motive was ased soely pon a illict one he poice may ask a peso who
has legtmately ee stopped o denticatio withot condctig a Forth Amedmet
seach o seize See Hibel v Sxth Jdicial Distict Cort o Nev Hmboldt Cot
542 US 177 185 (2004) ("i the oday cose a polce oice is ee to ask
qestos fo identicatio wthot mplcatng the Forth Amedmet"); INS v
Delado, 466 US 20, 216 (984) (iteogatio elatig to ones idetty o a eqest
o idetificato y police does ot, y itself costitte a Forth Amendmet seize.
A205-056-436 4 Deceme 6 2013
I m m i r a n t & R e f u
e e A p p e l l a t e C e n
t e r , L L C| w w w . i r a c . n e t
-
8/19/2019 Ivan Velazco Castellano, A205 056 436 (BIA March 8, 2016)
10/14z
See also US v DiazCasaeda 9 F3 116 (9h Cir 2007)
Frhermoe e Cou notes ta in e ody o respondents moion it
ndicates tat is case "ivove a rvng patrl te CBP agets were, heefore
eqired o have a probae cause to eec e stop . te CBP agents a absoutey
no prbabe cause] to unecessarily proong he sop o evenally seze [respoden]'s
person as a passeger in he vehicle . and offe [ ] as he main reason for eecting te
stop o e veicle . . ra a ed ight. See 213 . what s means is the ony rea basis
r e sop was CBP agen looking a esponde's appearance and sspecing m o
e legal This case, hereore is ohing more a a delibeate egregious
vioaton' o te Fourth Amenmen maig the oice o Appea -213 and any
proce evience thereafe n support o aienate suec o exclusio Pages 7 o 8
OBJECTIONS AND MOTIOS
These statements clealy relect hat the preset ojecios and motios
are ased on eroneos acal consideration he motio falls sot of esablisng
hat te or 23 is teree suppessibe o inamissibe. Accodigy the
respodes applcaio for sppessio must e denied
As o e respondens ojectons to the orm 213, te present motion
fails o ideiy ay erro in te or -213. Respode's declarations indcae tat the
Casad polce asked him if e were a embe of a gang o which he deed. The
form -213 indcates ta the Carlsad police, Corpoal Golanos, ade contac wih e
respoen as the esult of a roine call regadig a suspicious perso an Golaosrecogized he respode as a "docmeed gag membe There is ohig
presented at wold cal nto qeson the veacity o e inormaon in e o -213
Te otion also ailed to provide legal ahory to spport he caim that
he espondent is etitled to cofron an coss-examie he aker o e om 2 3.
A205056-436 5 Decebe 6 2013
Z ; .G
I m m i g r a n t & R e
f u g e e A p p e l l a t e C e
n t e r , L L C| w w w . i r
a c . n e t
-
8/19/2019 Ivan Velazco Castellano, A205 056 436 (BIA March 8, 2016)
11/14
The case ced i his motio Heradez-Guadarrama v Ashcrof 394 F3d 674 (9th
Cir 200) relaes o a aidavit nsead o a -2 13. The Nith Circui Cour
of Appeas has held n Cruz-Esioza NS 4 F3d 308 309 (9th Cir 1 995) that an
autheicaed orm 2 1 3 as robative on the ssue of illegal etry specifically noed
hough that the informaion on a orm 2 3 could not be presumed true he he
source of that informatio was eiher a Governmenal oicial or the subjec of the
repor or here here as evidence of urelability I his case, hoever the
inormaton in he orm -21 3 ere ot based upon extraneous evidence but rather
based o he respondents saemets made to the maker of the documet and
nformaio from olce oicers ivoled i he case Heradez-Guadarrama s,
herere iaposie n this case Furhermore the declaraos provided failed to
esablish that the informaio i the form -21 3 is ureliable under Cruz-Esinoza v INS
sura the form -21 3 is thereore properly admissible because it is probative on the
issue of removabiity ad is fair abset evdence of coercion The preset objecions
are herefore hout meri or legal bass l and the orm -21 3 is admied
as it s nherenly trustohy 1 . The Court inds tha
the objectios relatng to the admission of this orm -213 ail to establsh a suficiet
legal basis or hich o exclude hs document
Having admited he Governmet's form -21 3 the Court sustaied the
allegaios tha he respondet is no a ciize or aional of the United States bu
instead he is an alie based upo his satus of beig a ative and citizen o Mexico
The burde he shifs, uder Secio 29 o the Ac, to the respondet to estabish by
clear ad convicng evidece relaig o his ime place, and maer of enry I hat
regard the Court oes tha responde, through counsel, adsed he Court that he has
no evdence to present i terms of his time lace, and maer of enry Accordngly
A20-06-436 6 December 6 2013
I m m i g r a n t & R e f u g e e A p p e l l a t e C e n
t e r , L L C| w w w . i r a
c . n e t
-
8/19/2019 Ivan Velazco Castellano, A205 056 436 (BIA March 8, 2016)
12/14
the Govermet s ettled to the charge ad the charge therefore must be sustaed.
Respodet deced to desgate a coutry of removal n ths case The
Governmet n ths case recommended respodet's natve country of Mexco as the
coutry of remova As to relef the oy reef appled for or othese established by
the respondet is fr volutary deparure at the cocusio of the proceedngs
Consderg the evdece preseted that there s o statutory bar for volutary
depaure and the Goverments non-opposition to grat of this mma frm of
discretoary relef, the Court fds that t s approprate under the totality of
crcumstances to grat hm ths opporuty despte apparetly that he had had more
tha oe legal etry to the Uted States There s o other appcato apped for or
othese establshed by the respodet The record does ot conta ay other
pedg reef applcatos upo whch the Court could adjudcate o the merts Based
upon the foregog the folowg orders shal therefore be etered:
ORDERS
IT S EREBY ORDERED that the respodent be grated volutarydeparture lieu of a order of removal such departure to take pace without expese
to the Unted States Goverent on or before February 4 2014
IT IS FRTER ORDERED that the respodet shal pay a $500
vountary departure bod to the Imgrato ad Customs Efrcement field oce
drector within fve busess days of todays date
T S FURTER ORDERED that the respondet shall preset to the
Departmet of omead Securty o or before Jauary 6 2014 a ecessary travel
ocumes or vounary departure
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that shoud the respodet fal to abde by
any of the foregog orders or shoud he wthdraw hs request for volutay departure
A205056436 7 Qeceber 6, 2013
I m m i r a n t & R e f u
e e A p p e l l a t e C e n
t e r , L L C| w w w . i r a c . n e t
-
8/19/2019 Ivan Velazco Castellano, A205 056 436 (BIA March 8, 2016)
13/14
hen hese voluntary departure orders sall wihout urter notce or proceedngs vacate
and the aternate order of remova shall become efectve e olowing day: the
respondent sall be removed from the United States to Mexico on the charge contaed
in te Noice to Appear
THI RR OF O L D IO W V WD ON EBRY
W E BE O E ECD OCE ED G
sinature
December 6 201 3
A20-056-436
Please see the next page for electronic
PHI IP S. mmigration Jdge
8 December 6, 201 3
I m m i g r a n t & R e f u
g e e A p p e l l a t e C e n
t e r , L L C| w w w . i r a
c . n e t
-
8/19/2019 Ivan Velazco Castellano, A205 056 436 (BIA March 8, 2016)
14/14
�\
/ I s l
Imigraton Judge PHIL P S . AW
lawp o Febuay 6 , 2 0 1 4 a 1 : 57 M GT
A205-06436 9 December 6, 2013
I m m i g r a n t & R e
f u g e e A p p e l l a t e C e
n t e r , L L C| w w w . i r
a c . n e t