Land Subsidence Monitoring Report
Number 1
July 2013
By Brian D. Conway
Land Subsidence Monitoring Report 1
Table of Contents
List of Figures ................................................................................................................................. 2
List of Pictures ................................................................................................................................ 2
List of Graphs ................................................................................................................................. 2
Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................................ 3
Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................ 4
ADWR’s Land Subsidence Monitoring Program ........................................................................................ 5
ADWR’s InSAR Program ............................................................................................................................ 5
ADWR’s InSAR Results ............................................................................................................................... 6
Surveying Results ...................................................................................................................................... 6
Green Valley/Sahuarita Results ....................................................................................................... 6
Cochise County/Willcox Basin Results ............................................................................................. 7
McMullen Valley Basin Results ........................................................................................................ 8
Holbrook Basin Results .................................................................................................................... 9
Hawk Rock Results ......................................................................................................................... 10
Future Land Subsidence Data Collection ................................................................................................ 10
Land Subsidence Monitoring Report 2
List of Figures
Figure 1. Arizona land subsidence features .......................................................................................... 12
Figure 2. West Valley land subsidence feature ..................................................................................... 13
Figure 3. Northeast Phoenix/Scottsdale land subsidence feature ........................................................ 14
Figure 4. Hawk Rock land subsidence feature ...................................................................................... 15
Figure 5. Tucson land subsidence feature ............................................................................................. 16
Figure 6. Green Valley land subsidence feature ................................................................................... 17
Figure 7. Maricopa-Stanfield land subsidence feature ......................................................................... 18
Figure 8. Picacho-Eloy land subsidence feature .................................................................................... 19
Figure 9. McMullen Valley land subsidence feature ............................................................................. 20
Figure 10. Harquahala Valley land subsidence feature .......................................................................... 21
Figure 11. Ranegras Valley land subsidence feature .............................................................................. 22
Figure 12. Fort Grant Rd land subsidence feature .................................................................................. 23
Figure 13. Kansas Settlement land subsidence feature .......................................................................... 24
Figure 14. Elfrida land subsidence feature.............................................................................................. 25
Figure 15. Bowie/San Simon land subsidence feature ........................................................................... 26
Figure 16. Holbrook Basin land subsidence feature ............................................................................... 27
Figure 17. Location Map of Usery Mountain Park and San Tan Mountain Park CORS ........................... 28
Figure 18. Current satellites frames used by ADWR to collect InSAR data in Arizona............................ 29
List of Pictures
Picture 1. GPS Surveying along Sahuarita Rd in Green Valley ................................................................ 6
Picture 2. Collecting gravity and groundwater level data in Green Valley............................................. 6
Picture 3. Earth fissure warning sign in Cochise County ........................................................................ 7
Picture 4. Exposed well casing in Cochise County .................................................................................. 8
Picture 5. Sulfur Hills earth fissure in Cochise County ........................................................................... 8
Picture 6. Centennial Wash flooding the town of Wenden in 2010, McMullen Valley ........................ 9
Picture 7. GPS Surveying in the McMullen Valley ................................................................................. 9
Picture 8. Expansion cracks located in the Chimney Canyon Area, Holbrook Basin ............................. 9
Picture 9. GPS Surveying in the Chimney Canyon Area of the Holbrook Basin ..................................... 9
Picture 10. Earth fissure located at Baseline Rd and Meridian Rd in the Hawk Rock Feature .............. 10
Picture 11. Usery Mountain Park bedrock CORS ................................................................................... 10
List of Graphs
Graph 1. GPS Survey and groundwater data for the Green Valley Land Subsidence Feature ................. 7
Graph 2. GPS Survey data for land subsidence along Dragoon Rd in Cochise County ............................ 8
Land Subsidence Monitoring Report 3
Acknowledgements
This Land Subsidence Monitoring Report was completed with the help of many individuals who collected and/or contributed data, helped with data analysis, or provided editorial help and suggestions. Contributors include, but are not limited to Frank Corkhill, Teri Davis, Paul Ivanich, and Tracey Carpenter of ADWR who offered editorial suggestions. Paul Ivanich, Brian Mihlfeith, and Michael Winn (retired) of ADWR and Rob Carruth of the USGS assisted with survey-grade GPS data, transducer groundwater level data, and gravity data collection.
The help provided by these individuals and all those not listed is deeply appreciated.
Land Subsidence Monitoring Report 4
Executive Summary
In 1997, the Arizona Department of Water Resources created a land subsidence monitoring program. The program initially focused on monitoring land subsidence in the east valley of the Phoenix Metropolitan area using survey-grade GPS equipment. In 2002, ADWR was awarded a 3-year $1.3 million NASA grant to expand the land subsidence monitoring program to include Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar data (InSAR). Upon completion of the NASA grant in 2005, ADWR quickly migrated to a land subsidence program that primarily utilized InSAR data using GPS surveying to support the program. With the InSAR data, ADWR has identified more than 25 land subsidence features in Arizona, collectively covering more than 2,800 square miles of the state (Figure 1). In addition, the program now cooperates with 12 entities whose financial assistance allows the Department to fund the InSAR data collection. ADWR provides land subsidence maps for download from ADWR’s website. As of May 2013, 163 land subsidence maps are available for download and are used on a daily basis by geologists, hydrologists, engineers, planners, surveyors, floodplain managers, GIS analysts, and water resources managers.
Land Subsidence Monitoring Report 5
ADWR’s Land Subsidence Monitoring Program In 1997 numerous non-exempt wells were proposed in the Apache Junction and Luke Air Force Base areas, both areas noted for significant historic land subsidence and earth fissuring. Arizona Department of Water Resources (ADWR) management had concerns over the potential for the new wells to cause unreasonable increasing harm which led to a Directorate level decision to begin a land subsidence monitoring program. As a result, Geophysics/Surveying Unit (GSU) of the Hydrology Division was created and started monitoring land subsidence by collecting survey-grade GPS data on survey monuments in the Hawk Rock land subsidence area located in east Mesa and Apache Junction. In 2002, ADWR was awarded a $1.3 million NASA grant to develop a land subsidence monitoring program over three years that processes satellite-based synthetic aperture radar (SAR) data using interferometry (InSAR). Upon completion of the NASA grant in 2005, ADWR quickly migrated to a land subsidence program that primarily utilized InSAR data using GPS surveying to support the program.
ADWR’s InSAR Program Synthetic Aperture Radar is a side-looking, active (produces its own illumination) radar-imaging system that transmits a pulsed microwave signal towards the earth and records both the amplitude and phase of the back-scattered signal that returns to the antenna. InSAR is a technique that utilizes interferometric processing that compares the amplitude and phase signals received during successive passes of the SAR platform over a specific geographic area at different times. InSAR techniques, using satellite-based SAR platform data, can be used to produce land-surface deformation products with cm-scale vertical resolution. Changes in land elevation are detected through the change in phase of the radar signal. InSAR is used to detect surface motion along active faults, on volcanoes, landslides, sinkholes, and other geologic hazards.
ADWR has developed an extensive library of over 1,200 SAR scenes used to process InSAR data, covering an area greater than 150,000 square miles at a cost of more than $750,000, mostly paid for by grants and cooperators. ADWR has compiled a state-wide dataset for the active land subsidence areas identified with InSAR data in Arizona. Most datasets cover time periods between 1992 to 2000, 2004 to 2010, 2006 to 2011, and 2010 to present. Using these data, ADWR has identified more than 25 land subsidence features in Arizona, collectively covering more than 2,800 square miles (Figure 1). ADWR provides land subsidence maps for download from ADWR’s website. As of May 2013, 163 land subsidence maps are available for download and are used on a daily basis by geologists, hydrologists, engineers, planners, surveyors, floodplain managers, GIS analysts, and water resources managers and can be accessed at this link:
http://www.azwater.gov/AzDWR/Hydrology/Geophysics/LandSubsidenceInArizona.htm
ADWR also provides an interactive land subsidence map that utilizes a Google Maps interface and can be accessed at this link:
http://maps.google.com/maps?q=http%3A//www.azwater.gov/AzDWR/Hydrology/Geophysics/ArizonaLandSubsidenceArea04-2013.kmz
ADWR uses InSAR data not only for monitoring land subsidence, but also seasonal deformation (uplift and subsidence), natural and artificial recharge events, as a tool for geological mapping and investigations, locating earth fissures, identifying areas where conditions may exist for future earth fissure formation, and for dam mitigation and land subsidence modeling.
ADWR cooperates with the following groups: Flood Control District of Maricopa County, Pinal County Flood Control District, Metropolitan Domestic Water Improvement District, Central Arizona Project, Arizona Department of Transportation, Arizona State Land Department, Arizona Geological Survey, Community Water Company of Green Valley, City of Scottsdale, Cochise County, Salt River Project, and Petrified Forest National Park.
Land Subsidence Monitoring Report 6
ADWR InSAR Results ADWR initially started focusing the InSAR data collection efforts on the Phoenix and Tucson Active Management Areas (AMA), where there were already identified and well-documented land subsidence features. Three land subsidence features in the Phoenix AMA known as the West Valley (Figure 2), Northeast Phoenix/Scottsdale (Figure 3), and the Hawk Rock (Figure 4) land subsidence features, and also three land subsidence features in the Tucson AMA known as the Central Well-field and the Valencia features (Figure 5), and the Green Valley feature (Figure 6) were readily identified by ADWR using archived InSAR data from the 1990’s.
By cooperating with other federal, state, county, and local agencies and water companies, ADWR was able to greatly expand its data collection efforts to cover the entire State. The additional InSAR data provided ADWR the necessary resources to confirm two well-documented land subsidence areas in the Pinal AMA known as the Maricopa-Stanfield (Figure 7) and the Picacho-Eloy (Figure 8) land subsidence features. InSAR data for west-central Arizona helped ADWR identify three new land subsidence features in far western Maricopa and eastern La Paz Counties known as the McMullen Valley (Figure 9), Harquahala Valley (Figure 10), and the Ranegras Valley (Figure 11) land subsidence features. ADWR also identified two more land subsidence features in southwestern Maricopa County known as the Buckeye and Gila Bend features. The most recent land subsidence features identified with ADWR InSAR data are located in Cochise and Apache Counties. The Cochise County features currently have the highest magnitude of land subsidence in the entire State, greater than 8 centimeters/year (3.1 inches/year) and are known as the Fort Grant Rd (Figure 12), Kansas Settlement (Figure 13), Elfrida (Figure 14), and the Bowie/San Simon (Figure 15) land subsidence features. The Apache County features were identified while investigating possible land subsidence related to the existing Holbrook sinks and to also establish a baseline for any existing land subsidence around the Petrified Forest National Park before planned potash mining activity begins in the area. These features are known as the Holbrook Basin (Figure 16) land subsidence features.
GPS Surveying ADWR also collects survey-grade GPS data for ground-truthing of the InSAR data and for land subsidence monitoring in Hawk Rock Area in East Mesa and Apache Junction (Figure 4), Sahuarita/Green Valley Area (Figure 6), the McMullen Valley/Wenden Area (Figure 9), the Dragoon Rd Area in Cochise County (Figure 13) and the Chimney Canyon land subsidence feature in the Holbrook Basin (Figure 16).
Green Valley/Sahuarita Results Comparison of recent GPS surveying (Picture 1) and ADWR groundwater data (Picture 2) from the Sahuarita/Green Valley Area has shown a striking correlation.
Picture 1 - GPS Surveying along Sahuarita Rd in Green
Valley
Picture 2 - Collecting gravity and groundwater level data at the Rosemont East transducer, Green Valley
Land Subsidence Monitoring Report 7
Seasonal groundwater pumping demands have resulted in both seasonal groundwater declines and recovery of 110 feet, causing both seasonal uplift and land subsidence that reflect the groundwater changes (Graph 1).
Cochise County/Willcox Basin Results ADWR started collecting InSAR data over Cochise County in 2010 and the InSAR data has documented land subsidence of as much as 11 centimeters (4.3 inches) in a twelve month period.
ADWR also collects survey-grade GPS data in the center of one of the subsidence-bowls which is located between the towns of Dragoon and Willcox along Dragoon Rd within the Kansas Settlement land subsidence feature. ADWR was able to recover an old survey monument, V 261, which was established in 1945 by the National Geodetic Survey (NGS) along Dragoon Rd a mile west of US HWY 191. Comparing recent (2013) ADWR GPS data with the historical 1945 data, ADWR was able to determine that a total of 1.2 meters (3.9 feet) of land subsidence has occurred at this location since 1945, and 26 centimeters (10.2 inches) of land subsidence has occurred between 2011 and 2013 (Graph 2).
2340
2390
2440
2490
2540
2590
795.360
795.370
795.380
795.390
795.400
795.410
795.420
795.430
795.440
795.450De
c-11
Feb-
12
Apr-
12
May
-12
Jul-1
2
Aug-
12
Oct
-12
Dec-
12
Jan-
13
Mar
-13
May
-13
Jun-
13
Wat
er L
evel
Ele
vatio
n (ft
)
Ellip
soid
Hei
ght (
m)
Data Collection Date
Sahuarita GPS Survey for Land Subsidence Monitoring and InSAR Support Ellipsoid Height Water Level Elevation
Graph 1 – GPS Survey and transducer groundwater data for the Green Valley Land Subsidence Feature
Picture 3 - Earth Fissure warning sign along Dragoon Rd in Cochise County
Land Subsidence Monitoring Report 8
There is also an exposed well casing (Picture 4) about a mile northwest of the V 261 survey monument, and numerous earth fissures located in the Willcox Basin (Picture 5). These features further document the amount of historical land subsidence that has occurred in the immediate area as well as the need for ADWR to continue to surveying V 261 for land subsidence in this area.
Picture 4 - Exposed well casing in Cochise County Picture 5 - Sulfur Hills earth fissure in Cochise County
McMulley Valley Basin Results ADWR first detected land subsidence in the McMullen Valley in 2008 with InSAR data. In 2010, the Town of Wenden, located in the McMullen Valley, was flooded for a second time in ten years (2000) by Centennial Wash. The Town of Wenden is located within a land subsidence bowl which has contributed
1258.175 m
1257.912 m
1257.85
1257.90
1257.95
1258.00
1258.05
1258.10
1258.15
1258.20
3/30
/201
1
11/1
5/20
11
4/9/
2012
6/7/
2012
10/2
3/20
12
2/13
/201
3
4/7/
2013
Ellip
soid
Hei
ght (
m)
GPS Survey Date
Cochise County V261 GPS Survey for Land Subsidence Monitoring and InSAR Support
Graph 2 – GPS Survey data for land subsidence along Dragoon Rd in Cochise County
Land Subsidence Monitoring Report 9
to the recent flooding. ADWR recently recovered three historical NGS monuments (A 480, Y 479, X 479) in the Wenden Area (Picture 7) that will be used for on-going ground-truthing of the InSAR data and for land subsidence monitoring in the McMullen Valley.
Picture 6 - Centennial Wash flooding the Town of
Wenden in 2010 (Photo credit La Paz County)
Picture 7 - GPS Surveying in the McMullen Valley
Comparing recent ADWR GPS data with the historical 1991 data for the three survey monuments, a total of 0.28 meters (0.92 feet), 0.43 meters (1.4 feet), and 0.81 meters (2.7 feet) of land subsidence has occurred at these three locations since 1991. ADWR will continue to survey (Figure 3) all three survey monuments for monitoring land subsidence in the McMullen Valley.
Holbrook Basin Results ADWR recently discovered three new land subsidence features in the Holbrook Basin (Figure 16) while investigating potential land subsidence related to the well-documented geologic sink features that exist in the basin.
While the two southern-most land subsidence features seem to be directly related to the more than 400 existing sinks located throughout the basin, these two sinks are much larger in size but not as deep. Staff from the AZGS and ADWR visited the Chimney Canyon sink (Picture 9) and collected baseline GPS survey data in October 2012 (Picture 9). Repeat survey data will be collected in the near future to monitor
Picture 8 - One of the many expansion cracks located in
the Chimney Canyon Area of the Holbrook Basin
Picture 9 - GPS Surveying in the Chimney Canyon Area
of the Holbrook Basin
any changes in these features, as part of the ongoing cooperative land subsidence monitoring efforts between the AZGS and ADWR.
Land Subsidence Monitoring Report 10
Hawk Rock Results ADWR has conducted several GPS surveys in the Hawk Rock Area since 1997. The monument, SGC 17, was first measured in 1973. Comparing the SGC 17 elevation from 1973 and a re-surveyed elevation from 2013, SGC 17 has subsided just over 1.55 meters (5.1 feet) in 40 years. Recently ADWR recovered three historical monuments, Y 477, SS-C, and SS-D (Figure 4). The SS-C and SS-D monuments were first established in 1978 during the first land subsidence studies in preparation and design of the CAP canal and the Y 477 monument was established later in 1991. Recent ADWR survey results (2013) showed that Y 477 has subsided 0.46 meters (1.52 feet) since 1991, and SS-C has subsided 0.37 meters (1.21 feet) and SS-D has subsidence 0.35 meters (1.13 feet) since 1978. The SS-C and SS-D monuments are located 50 feet across from each other, situated on different sides of an active earth fissure (Picture 10), further documenting the vertical offset on either side of the earth fissure.
Continuous Operating Reference Station Over the past three years, ADWR has played an important role in site-selection and installation of several GPS Continuous Operating Reference Station (CORS) sites in Arizona. Many of the CORS sites are operated by the State Cartographer’s Office (SCO) with the Arizona State Land Department and all the data is managed by the National Geodetic Survey. There are more than twenty CORS sites located throughout Arizona that provide precise GPS data that are then used for both real-time and post-processed surveying projects. For those projects that require accurate and precise elevations, it is crucial that the survey control is stable and not subsiding. As a result, ADWR has provided guidance for where stable sites may be located away from land subsidence areas to not only the SCO, but to other entities.
ADWR has worked with the SCO, Central Arizona Project, Maricopa County Department of Transportation, and Maricopa County Parks to install two new stable CORS sites that are located on bedrock in Eastern Maricopa County at Usery Mountain and San Tan Mountain Parks (Figure 17). These sites will provide stable vertical control around the Hawk Rock land subsidence feature to the surveying community.
Future Land Subsidence Data Collection ADWR’s GPS-surveying program plays a vital role in supporting the State-wide InSAR land subsidence monitoring program. Routine survey data will continue to be collected in existing areas and other subsidence areas will be examined to determine if additional surveying locations should be added for enhanced monitoring using GPS surveying techniques.
ADWR continues to provide land subsidence products for its own hydrologic studies and for cooperators, consultants, other government and private entities, and the public. At the same time, ADWR is continually searching for additional InSAR cooperators, educating groups about the InSAR data and how the data can be used to meet their monitoring needs, and further enhancing the InSAR program through investments in software and hardware upgrades.
ADWR will continue to collect InSAR data around the State at the existing data collection frequency and spatial distribution (Figure 18). ADWR will also continue to update land subsidence maps on an annual basis, making the maps available on the Department’s website.
Picture 10 - Earth Fissure located at Baseline Rd and Meridian Rd in the Hawk Rock feature
Picture 11 –Usery Mountain Bedrock CORS
Land Subsidence Monitoring Report 11
Figures
0 25 50 75 10012.5Miles
Active Land Subsidence Area
Highways and InterstatesInterstate
US
State µ1:2,832,259
Figure 1 - Active Land Subsidence Areas in Arizona Based on ADWR InSAR Data InSAR Data is Collected, Processed, and Analyzed
By the Geophysics/Surveying Unit of the Hydrology Division
Land Subsidence Monitoring Report 12
!
!
!
!
!!!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!
!!
!
!!!
!
!
!!!!
!!
!!!
!!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!!!!!
!
!
Bell Rd
59th
Ave
Olive Ave
43rd
Ave
McDowell Rd
83rd
Ave
Van Buren St
Northern Ave
67th
Ave
91st
Ave
Dysa
rt Rd
Citru
s Rd Camelback Rd
Cotto
n Ln
Indian School Rd
51st
Ave
Litch
field
Rd
75th
Ave
Yuma Rd 99th
Ave
Glendale Ave
Cactus Rd
Thomas Rd
Reem
s Rd Peoria Ave
Sariv
al Av
eUnion Hills Dr
107th
Ave
Greenway Rd
Waddell Rd
Perry
ville
Rd
El Mi
rage
Rd
163rd
Ave
Jack
rabbit
Tr
111th
Ave
Thunderbird RdBu
llard
Ave
Lake
Plea
sant
Rd
Deer Valley Rd
Patton Rd
195th
Ave
Alsu
p Ave
103rd
Ave
Beardsley Rd
Deer Valley Dr
Boswell Blvd
219th
Ave
Happy Valley Rd
Verra
do W
y
Bethany Home Rd
Avon
dale
Blvd
R H Johnson Blvd
Del W
ebb B
lvd
Vistancia Blvd
Jomax Rd
Stardust Blvd
115th
Ave
Sunrise
BlvdEs
trella
Pkwy
Wigwam Blvd
Pinnacle Peak Rd
Glen
Harbo
r Blvd
Tuthi
ll Rd
Old Dean Rd
Parkv
iew Pl
94th
Dr
Western Ave
Terra
mar B
lvd
rx303
rx101
§̈¦10
0 2 4 6 81Miles
05/08/2010 To 04/22/2013Subsidence
Decorrelation/No Data6 To 8 cm4 To 6 cm3 To 4 cm2 To 3 cm1 To 2 cm0 To 1 cm
Subsidence FeatureHardrock
!
! ! CAP CanalHighways and Interstates
InterstateUSStateRoads
Figure 2 - Land Subsidence in Western Metropolitan PhoenixBased on ADWR Radarsat-2 InSAR Data
© MDA 2010 - 2013
µ1:183,029
Decorrelation (white areas) are areas where the phase of the received satellite signal changed between satellite passes, causing the data to be unusable. This occurs in areas where the land surface has been disturbed (i.e. bodies of water, snow, agriculture areas, areas of development, etc).
Time Period of Analysis: 3.0 Years 05/08/2010 To 04/22/2013
Note! Colors assigned representing differing amounts of subsidence apply to this map only. Color codes may varyfor other maps
Land Subsidence Monitoring Report 13
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!!!
!!
!
!
!
!
Shea Blvd
Tatu
m Bl
vd
7th St
56th
St
Scott
sdale
Rd
Bell Rd
Cactus Rd
32nd
St
Cave
Cree
k Rd
Pima R
d
40th
St
Via Linda
Hayden Rd
Lincoln Dr
64th
St
Dynamite Blvd
Pinnacle Peak Rd
McDonald Dr16th
St
128th
St
Jomax Rd
Union Hills Dr
Thunderbird Rd
Greenway Rd
Rio Verde Dr
Mayo Blvd
136th
St
Frank Lloyd Wright Blvd
Indian Bend Rd
Happy Valley Rd24
th St
Deer Valley Dr
124th
St
94th
St
Greenway Pkwy
92nd
St
Deer Valley Rd
Raintree Dr
90th
StDoubletree Ranch Rd
Glendale Ave
Northern AveVia De Ventura
Camelback Rd
108th
St10
4th St
Peoria Ave
McCormick Pkwy
Princess Dr
Exten
sion R
d
rx51
rx101
0 1 2 3 40.5Miles
05/08/2010 To 04/22/2013Subsidence
Decorrelation/No Data2.0 To 2.5 cm1.5 To 2.0 cm1.0 To 1.5 cm0.5 To 1.0 cm0 To 0.5 cm
Subsidence FeatureHardrock
!
! ! CAP CanalHighways and Interstates
InterstateUSStateRoads
Figure 3 - Land Subsidence in Northeast Phoenix and Scottsdale AreasBased on ADWR Radarsat-2 InSAR Data
© MDA 2010 - 2013
µ1:138,037
Decorrelation (white areas) are areas where the phase of the received satellite signal changed between satellite passes, causing the data to be unusable. This occurs in areas where the land surface has been disturbed (i.e. bodies of water, snow, agriculture areas, areas of development, etc).
Time Period of Analysis: 3.0 Years 05/08/2010 To 04/22/2013
Note! Colors assigned representing differing amounts of subsidence apply to this map only. Color codes may varyfor other maps
Land Subsidence Monitoring Report 14
!
!
!!!
!!!
!
!!
!
!!!!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!!
!
!
!!
!!
!!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!.!.
!.
!. SS-DSS-C
Y 473
SGC 17
Ellsw
orth
Rd
Apache Tr
Viney
ard R
d
Southern Ave
Elliot Rd
Crism
on R
d
Baseline Rd
University Dr
Germann Rd
Broadway Rd
Superstition Blvd
Moun
tain R
dBaseline Ave
Merid
ian R
d
Toma
hawk
Rd
Pecos Rd
Signa
l Butt
e Rd
Broadway Ave
Guadalupe Rd
Goldf
ield R
d
Ironw
ood D
r
Moun
tain V
iew R
d
Warner Rd
Hawe
s Rd
Idaho
Rd
Williams Field Rd
rx202
rx88
£¤60
0 1 2 3 40.5Miles
05/15/2010 To 04/29/2013Subsidence
Decorelation/No Data4 To 5 cm3 To 4 cm2 To 3 cm1 To 2 cm0.5 To 1.0 cm0 To 0.5 cm
Subsidence Feature!. Survey Monument
Hardrock!
! ! CAP CanalHighways and Interstates
InterstateUSStateRoads
Figure 4 - Land Subsidence in the Hawk Rock Area of East Mesa and Apache JunctionBased on ADWR Radarsat-2 InSAR Data
© MDA 2010 - 2013
µ1:91,309
Decorrelation (white areas) are areas where the phase of the received satellite signal changed between satellite passes, causing the data to be unusable. This occurs in areas where the land surface has been disturbed (i.e. bodies of water, snow, agriculture areas, areas of development, etc).
Time Period of Analysis: 3.0 Years 05/15/2010 To 04/29/2013
Note! Colors assigned representing differing amounts of subsidence apply to this map only. Color codes may varyfor other maps
Land Subsidence Monitoring Report 15
E 22ND ST
S KOL
B RD
S MISS
ION
RD
E VALENCIA RD
E SPEEDWAY BL
E BROADWAY BL
E GRANT RD
S PAR
K AV
S ALV
ERNO
N WY
S 12T
H AV
S 6TH
AV
E 5TH ST
E RIVER RD
S NOGALES HYN
SWAN
RD
E GOLF LINKS RD
S WILM
OT R
D
E AJO WY
N ST
ONE A
V
W VALENCIA RD
E 36TH STS K
INO
PW
E DREXEL RD
E 29TH ST
W IRVINGTON RD
E 6TH ST
W SPEEDWAY BL
N SILVERBELL RD
N 1S
T AV
N CA
MPBE
LL AV
S RITA
RD
W AJO HY W AJO WY
S PAL
O VE
RDE
RD
N CR
AYCR
OFT R
D
E AVIATION PW
W ANKLAM RD
E FORT LOWELL RD
N 6T
H AV
N OR
ACLE
RD
E PIMA ST
W STARR PASS BL
E PRINCE RD
S PAN
TANO
RD
S 10T
H AV
W GRANT RD
S CAR
DINA
L AV
N KO
LB R
D
W PRINCE RD
S SWA
N RD
E IRVINGTON RD
N EU
CLID
AV
N PA
NTAN
O RD
E CLOUD RD
W DREXEL RD
S CAM
INO
SECO
N CA
MINO
SECO
W SAN XAVIER RD
N BE
AR C
ANYO
N RD
W SAINT MARYS RD
W CONGRESS ST
W 22ND ST
E OLD VAIL CONNECTION RD
S GOL
F LIN
KS R
D
N WI
LMOT
RD
W DREXEL RD
S WILM
OT R
D
S SWA
N RD
§̈¦10
§̈¦19
0 1 2 3 40.5Miles
05/15/2010 To 04/29/2013Subsidence
Decorrelation/No Data2.0 To 3.0 cm1.5 To 2.0 cm1.0 To 1.5 cm0.5 To 1.0 cm0 To 0.5 cm
Subsidence FeatureHardrock
Highways and InterstatesInterstateUSStateRoadsRailway
Figure 5 - Land Subsidence in the Tucson Metropolitan AreaBased on ADWR Radarsat-2 InSAR Data
© MDA 2010 - 2013
µ1:121,136
Decorrelation (white areas) are areas where the phase of the received satellite signal changed between satellite passes, causing the data to be unusable. This occurs in areas where the land surface has been disturbed (i.e. bodies of water, snow, agriculture areas, areas of development, etc).
Time Period of Analysis: 3.0 Years 05/15/2010 To 04/29/2013
Note! Colors assigned representing differing amounts of subsidence apply to this map only. Color codes may varyfor other maps
Land Subsidence Monitoring Report 16
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!!!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!
!.
!.
!.Rosemont Copper East
Rosemont Copper West
S NOG
ALES
HY
E SAHUARITA RD
S LA
CANA
DA D
R
W DUVAL MINE RD
W TWIN BUTTES RDS O
LD N
OGAL
ES H
Y
W HELMET PEAK RDN A
BREG
O DR
N LA
CAN
ADA
DR
S MISSION RD
W PIMA MINE RD
W SAHUARITA RD
E PIMA MINE RD
W TWIN BUTTES RD
ADWR GV 01
0 0.65 1.3 1.95 2.60.325Miles
02/22/2012 To 04/29/2013Subsidence
Decorrelation/No Data2.0 To 4.0 cm1.0 To 2.0 cm0.5 To 1.0 cm0 To 0.5 cm
Subsidence Feature!. Survey Monument!. ADWR Transducer
Hardrock
!! CAP Canal
Highways and InterstatesInterstateUSStateRoadsRailway
Figure 6 - Land Subsidence in the Sahuarita and Green Valley Areas, Pima CountyBased on ADWR Radarsat-2 InSAR Data
© MDA 2012 - 2013
µ1:86,569
Decorrelation (white areas) are areas where the phase of the received satellite signal changed between satellite passes, causing the data to be unusable. This occurs in areas where the land surface has been disturbed (i.e. bodies of water, snow, agriculture areas, areas of development, etc).
Time Period of Analysis: 1.1 Years 02/22/2012 To 04/29/2013
!"d$
Note! Colors assigned representing differing amounts of subsidence apply to this map only. Color codes may varyfor other maps
Land Subsidence Monitoring Report 17
PETERS RD
RUSS
ELL R
D
CHUI
CHU
RD
WARR
EN R
D
RALS
TON
RD
MURP
HY R
D
SMITH
RD
CLAYTON RD
FARRELL RD
THOR
NTON
RD
MONT
GOME
RY R
D
PORT
ER R
D
BARNES RD
SHEDD RD
FUQU
A RD
WHITE
AND
PARK
ER R
D
HONEYCUTT RD
SMITH ENKE RD
MIDW
AY R
D
AMAR
ILLO
VALL
EY R
D
HIDD
EN VA
LLEY
RD
STEEN RD
HANNA RD
SELMA HWY
TEEL RD
MESQUITE RD
CAMINO GRANDE WH
ITE R
D
ANDE
RSON
RD
WOODRUFF RD INDI
AN VA
LLEY
RD
ETHI
NGTO
N RD
PAPAGO RD
PORT
ER R
D
ARICA RD
KORTSEN RD
CLAYTON RD
TEEL RD
RUSS
ELL R
D
STANFIELD RD
PETERS RD
KORTSEN RD
MILLER RD
HOUSER RD
BIAN
CO R
D
SMITH
RD
MILLER RD
GREE
N RD
FUQU
E RD
MURP
HY R
D
BARNES RD
STAN
FIELD
RD
BURR
IS RD
VAL VISTA BLVD
MURP
HY R
D
rx347
rx84
rx238
§̈¦8
§̈¦10
0 3 6 9 121.5Miles
05/08/2010 To 04/22/2013Subsidence
Decorrelation/No Data3.0 To 4.0 cm2.0 To 3.0 cm1.5 To 2.0 cm1.0 To 1.5 cm0.5 To 1.0 cm0 To 0.5 cm
Subsidence FeatureHardrock
!
! ! CAP CanalArizona Highways and Interstates
InterstateUSStateRoadsRailway
Figure 7 - Land Subsidence in the Maricopa-Stanfield Sub-Basin, Pinal CountyBased on ADWR Radarsat-2 InSAR Data
© MDA 2010 - 2013
µ1:257,110
Decorrelation (white areas) are areas where the phase of the received satellite signal changed between satellite passes, causing the data to be unusable. This occurs in areas where the land surface has been disturbed (i.e. bodies of water, snow, agriculture areas, areas of development, etc).
Time Period of Analysis: 3.0 Years 05/08/2010 To 04/22/2013
Note! Colors assigned representing differing amounts of subsidence apply to this map only. Color codes may varyfor other maps
Land Subsidence Monitoring Report 18
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!!!
!!
!!
!
!!!
!
!!
!
!!
!!
!!
!
!!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!!!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
KLECK RD
BATTAGLIA DR
SUNL
AND
GIN
RD
SELMA HWY
OVER
FIELD
RD
PETERS RD
TWEE
DY R
D
LA PA
LMA
RD
STOREY RD
HARMON RD
TOLT
EC H
WY
RUSS
ELL R
D
MCCARTNEY RD
CHUI
CHU
RD
PRETZER RD
LAMB
RD
HANNA RD
RANDOLPH RD
SUNS
HINE
BLV
D
CORNMAN RD
BIAN
CO R
D
MARTIN RD
CURTIS RD
EARLEY RD
TREK
ELL R
D
BURR
IS RD
VAH KI INN RD
HOTTS RD
ARIES DR
SHEDD RD
CLAYTON RD
HUNT HWY
THOR
NTON
RD
SKOU
SEN
RD
MONT
GOME
RY R
D
ATTA
WAY R
D
BARTLETT RDSIGNA
L PEA
K RD
PEAR
T RD
TOLT
EC B
UTTE
S RD
WOODRUFF RD
PICAC
HO H
WY
NUTT RD
ARICA RD
STEELE RD
BARNES RDHE
NNES
S RD
HOUSER RD
CURR
Y RD
CAMINO GRANDE
KENILWORTH RD
MILLER RD
GREENES RESERVOIR RD
VAL VISTA BLVD
SHAY RD
ETHI
NGTO
N RD
MILLIGAN RD
STOREY RD
ARICA RD ARICA RD
MIDW
AY R
D
TWEE
DY R
D
BIAN
CO R
D
TREK
ELL R
DTR
EKEL
L RD
TOLT
EC B
UTTE
S RD
ALSDORF RD
BAUMGARTNER RD
CURR
Y RD
TREK
ELL R
D
SHEDD RD
EARLEY RD
BURR
IS RD
HOUSER RD
OVER
FIELD
RD
KORTSEN RD
MIDW
AY R
D
PEAR
T RD
PHILLIPS RD
HANNA RD
rx84
rx387rx187
rx287rx87
rx287
rx79
§̈¦8
§̈¦10
§̈¦10
0 3 6 9 121.5Miles
05/15/2010 To 04/29/2013Subsidence
Decorelation/No Data4 To 5 cm3 To 4 cm2 To 3 cm1 To 2 cm0 To 1 cm
Subsidence FeatureHardrock
!
! ! CAP CanalHighways and Interstates
InterstateUSStateRoadsRailway
Figure 8 - Land Subsidence in the Picacho Sub-Basin, Pinal CountyBased on ADWR Radarsat-2 InSAR Data
© MDA 2010 - 2013
µ1:341,495
Decorrelation (white areas) are areas where the phase of the received satellite signal changed between satellite passes, causing the data to be unusable. This occurs in areas where the land surface has been disturbed (i.e. bodies of water, snow, agriculture areas, areas of development, etc).
Time Period of Analysis: 3.0 Years 05/15/2010 To 04/29/2013
Note! Colors assigned representing differing amounts of subsidence apply to this map only. Color codes may varyfor other maps
Land Subsidence Monitoring Report 19
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!
!
!.
!.
!.Y 479X 479
A 480
Alam
o Rd
Eagle
Eye R
d
Salome Rd
Aguila Rd
Hova
tter R
d
Harcuvar Rd
Sorefinger Rd Micro
wave
Stati
on R
d
491s
t Ave
County 69th St
Cente
nnial
Park
Rd
Pete Rd
County 86th St
Little Horn Peak Rd
County 67th St
Aguila Valley Rd
6th St
Aven
ue 66
1/2e
Balliet Rd
£¤60
£¤60
0 3 6 9 121.5Miles
05/01/2010 To 03/22/2013Subsidence
Decorrelation/No Data6.0 To 8.0 cm4.5 To 6.0 cm3.0 To 4.5 cm1.5 To 3.0 cm0 To 1.5 cm
Subsidence Feature!. Survey Monument
Hardrock
!
! ! CAP CanalHighways and Interstates
InterstateUSStateRoadsRailway
Figure 9 - Land Subsidence in the McMullen Valley, Maricopa and La Paz CountiesBased on ADWR Radarsat-2 Single Pair InSAR Data
© MDA 2010 - 2013
µ1:287,039
Decorrelation (white areas) are areas where the phase of the received satellite signal changed between satellite passes, causing the data to be unusable. This occurs in areas where the land surface has been disturbed (i.e. bodies of water, snow, agriculture areas, areas of development, etc).
Time Period of Analysis: 2.9 Years: 05/01/2010 To 03/22/2013
Note! Colors assigned representing differing amounts of subsidence apply to this map only. Color codes may varyfor other maps
Land Subsidence Monitoring Report 20
!
!
!
!!
!!!
!!!!!
!
!!
!
!!
!!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!
!!
!!
!
!
!!!!!!
Salome Hwy
Dobbins Rd
539th
Ave
Baseline Rd
491s
t Ave50
7th Av
e
Buckeye Rd
Courthouse RdHarq
uaha
la Va
lley R
d
Centennial Rd
Eagle
Eye R
d
483rd
Ave
Eagletail Rd
Elwood St
Van Buren St
Camelback Rd
477th Ave
547th
Ave
499th
Ave
§̈¦10
0 2 4 6 81Miles
05/01/2010 To 03/22/2013Subsidence
Decorrelation/No Data1.5 To 2.0 cm1.0 To 1.5 cm0.5 To 1.0 cm0 To 0.5 cm
Subsidence FeatureHardrock
!
! ! CAP CanalHighways and Interstates
InterstateUSStateRoads
Figure 10 - Land Subsidence in the Harquahala Valley, Maricopa CountyBased on ADWR Radarsat-2 InSAR Data
© MDA 2010 - 2013
µ1:207,806
Decorrelation (white areas) are areas where the phase of the received satellite signal changed between satellite passes, causing the data to be unusable. This occurs in areas where the land surface has been disturbed (i.e. bodies of water, snow, agriculture areas, areas of development, etc).
Time Period of Analysis: 2.9 Years 05/01/2010 To 03/22/2013
Note! Colors assigned representing differing amounts of subsidence apply to this map only. Color codes may varyfor other maps
Land Subsidence Monitoring Report 21
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!!!!!
!!!
!
!!
!!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!
!!
Vicks
burg
Rd
Aven
ue 49
e
Fewe
ll Ran
ch R
d
County 60th St
Balliet Rd
County 63rd St
0 1 2 3 40.5Miles
Figure 11 - Land Subsidence in the Ranegras Valley, La Paz CountyBased on ADWR Radarsat-2 InSAR Data
©MDA 2010 - 2013
µ1:121,130
Decorrelation (white areas) are areas where the phase of the received satellite signal changed between satellite passes, causing the data to be unusable. This occurs in areas where the land surface has been disturbed (i.e. bodies of water, snow, agriculture areas, areas of development, etc).
05/01/2010 To 03/22/2013Subsidence
Decorrelation/No Data2.0 To 3.0 cm1.5 To 2.0 cm1.0 To 1.5 cm0.5 To 1.0 cm0 To 0.5 cm
Subsidence FeatureHardrock
!
! ! CAP CanalHighways and Interstates
InterstateUSStateRoadsRailway
Time Period of Analysis: 2.9 Years 05/01/2010 To 03/22/2013
!"a$
Iv
?À
Note! Colors assigned representing differing amounts of subsidence apply to this map only. Color codes may varyfor other maps
Land Subsidence Monitoring Report 22
Fort
Gran
t
Briggs
Orchard
Ash Creek Hooker
Broo
kerso
nAsh Creek
Fort GrantFo
rt Gr
ant
Ash CreekHooker
AIRPORT
HASK
ELLFO
RT G
RANT
SAGUARO
CIRC
LE I
HAMI
LTON
INGR
AM
COX
TAYL
ORROCKHOUSE
OLD STEWART
HARDY
MULESHOE
MALEY
RANCH HOUSE
MARGUERITE
ATWO
OD
PAGE RANCHKO
RTSE
NS R
ANCH
JOE H
INES
NICK
ELS
WILLIAMS
VISTA BI
SBEE
REX ALLEN
BLACK
OLD
FORT
GRA
NT
MALEY
JOE H
INES
OLD FORT GRANT
FORT GRANT
OLD STEWART PAGE RANCH
0 2 4 6 81Miles
05/05/2010 To 03/26/2013Subsidence
Decorrelation/No Data12 To 15 cm9 To 12 cm6 To 9 cm4 To 6 cm2 To 4 cm0 To 2 cm
Subsidence FeatureHardrock
Highways and InterstatesInterstateUSStateRoadsRailway
Figure 12 - Land Subsidence in the Fort Grant Road and Willcox Areas, Cochise CountyBased on ADWR Radarsat-2 Time-Series InSAR Data
© MDA 2010 - 2013
µ1:191,637
Decorrelation (white areas) are areas where the phase of the received satellite signal changed between satellite passes, causing the data to be unusable. This occurs in areas where the land surface has been disturbed (i.e. bodies of water, snow, agriculture areas, areas of development, etc).
Time Period of Analysis: 2.9 Years 05/05/2010 To 03/26/2013
!"a$
Aë
Note! Colors assigned representing differing amounts of subsidence apply to this map only. Color codes may varyfor other maps
Land Subsidence Monitoring Report 23
AIRPORT
BAKER
SHELTON
BELL
RAN
CH
DESE
RT
HASK
ELL
BIRCH
PEARCE
IRONWOOD
KIMZEY
DRAGOON
ROBBS
SWANSON
MANZ
ORA
COX
PINTO
TAYL
OR
COCH
ISE ST
RONG
HOLD
TREASURE
CHAMBERS
SULPHUR SPRINGS
ARZBERGER
HAMI
LTON
HIGHLAND
JOHN
SON
CIRC
LE I
MALEY
KANS
AS SE
TTLE
MENT
PARKER RANCH
FORT
GRA
NT
GHOST TOWN
SEVEN DASH
JOE H
INES
FERN
EASTLAND
LANS
ING
RATHBI
SBEE
RICHLAND
BUSENBARK
I 010336A
KANS
AS SE
TTLE
MENT
DRAGOON DRAGOON
0 2 4 6 81Miles
05/05/2010 To 03/26/2013Subsidence
Decorrelation/No Data19 To 23 cm15 To 19 cm12 To 15 cm9 To 12 cm6 To 9 cm2 To 6 cm0 To 2 cm
Subsidence Feature!. Survey Monument
HardrockHighways and Interstates
InterstateUSStateRoadsRailway
Figure 13 - Land Subsidence in the Willcox and Kansas Settlement Areas, Cochise CountyBased on ADWR Radarsat-2 InSAR Data
© MDA 2010 - 2013
µ1:250,000
Decorrelation (white areas) are areas where the phase of the received satellite signal changed between satellite passes, causing the data to be unusable. This occurs in areas where the land surface has been disturbed (i.e. bodies of water, snow, agriculture areas, areas of development, etc).
Time Period of Analysis: 2.9 Years 05/05/2010 To 03/26/2013
K²
Aë
!"a$
Note! Colors assigned representing differing amounts of subsidence apply to this map only. Color codes may varyfor other maps
!.V 261
Land Subsidence Monitoring Report 24
DAVIS
BELL
GLEESON
WEBB
GHOS
T TOW
N
CENT
RAL
MORM
ON
JEFFERSON
COURTLAND
MOORE
RUCKER CANYON
MART
INEA
U
SLOV
ER
SHEEP
LATIMER
THOMPSON
NOBLE
HOPKINS
HEDGES
WHITE
FAWN
GLEESON
JEFFERSON
0 2 4 6 81Miles
05/05/2010 To 03/26/2013Subsidence
Decorrelation/No Data9 To 12 cm6 To 9 cm4 To 6 cm2 To 4 cm1 To 2 cm0 To 1 cm
Subsidence FeatureHardrock
Highways and InterstatesInterstateUSStateRoadsRailway
Figure 14 - Land Subsidence in the Elfrida Area, Cochise CountyBased on ADWR Radarsat-2 InSAR Data
© MDA 2010 - 2013
µ1:164,624
Decorrelation (white areas) are areas where the phase of the received satellite signal changed between satellite passes, causing the data to be unusable. This occurs in areas where the land surface has been disturbed (i.e. bodies of water, snow, agriculture areas, areas of development, etc).
Time Period of Analysis: 2.9 Years 05/05/2010 To 03/26/2013
K²
Note! Colors assigned representing differing amounts of subsidence apply to this map only. Color codes may varyfor other maps
Land Subsidence Monitoring Report 25
NOLA
ND
APACHE PASS
LUZENA
WOOD
CAN
YON
CENT
RAL
CARR
HILLTOP
INDI
AN SP
RING
S
SAND STORM
RATLIFF
PARK
ER
COMM
UNITY
ONEAL
FOOTHILLS
BALL
RILE
Y
PINERY CANYON
BUSINESS
CAVOT
COYOTE SONG
RIVERS
3RD
FAN
WHETTEN
MAHA
N
TURK
EY CR
EEK
HAPPY CAMP
MULKINS RANCH
QUAIL
BARNES
ROSEWOOD
NOLA
ND
0 2 4 6 81Miles
05/05/2010 To 03/26/2013Subsidence
Decorrelation/No Data6 To 9 cm4 To 6 cm2 To 4 cm1 To 2 cm0 To 1 cm
Subsidence FeatureHardrock
Highways and InterstatesInterstateUSStateRoadsRailway
Figure 15 - Land Subsidence in the Bowie and San Simon Areas, Cochise CountyBased on ADWR Radarsat-2 InSAR Data
© MDA 2010 - 2013
µ1:288,798
Decorrelation (white areas) are areas where the phase of the received satellite signal changed between satellite passes, causing the data to be unusable. This occurs in areas where the land surface has been disturbed (i.e. bodies of water, snow, agriculture areas, areas of development, etc).
Time Period of Analysis: 2.9 Years 05/05/2010 To 03/26/2013
!"a$
Aë
Note! Colors assigned representing differing amounts of subsidence apply to this map only. Color codes may varyfor other maps
Land Subsidence Monitoring Report 26
§̈¦40
rx99
rx377
0 1.5 3 4.5 60.75Miles
12/06/2006 To 02/01/2011Subsidence
Decorrelation/No Data18 To 26 cm12 To 18 cm6 To 12 cm4 To 6 cm2 To 4 cm0 To 2 cm
Subsidence Feature!. Survey Monument
HardrockHighways and Interstates
InterstateUSStateRoads
µ1:177,022
Decorrelation (white areas) are areas where the phase of the received satellite signal changed between satellite passes, causing the data to be unusable. This occurs in areas where the land surface has been disturbed (i.e. bodies of water, snow, agriculture areas, areas of development, etc).
Note! Colors assigned representing differing amounts of subsidence apply to this map only. Color codes may varyfor other maps
McCauley Sinks
Richard Lake
Figure 16 - Land Subsidence in the Holbrook Sinks Area, Navaho CountyBased on ADWR ALOS InSAR Data
© JAXA 2006 - 2011© ASF 2006 - 2011
Time Period of Analysis: 4.1 Years 12/06/2006 To 02/01/2011
Territorial Rd
McLaws Rd
Obed Rd
!. Chimney Canyon
Land Subsidence Monitoring Report 27
!.
!.
0 2 4 6 81Miles
1:182,411
!. Bedrock CORSHawk Rock Subsidence Feature
Highways and InterstatesInterstateUSState µ
Figure 17 - Bedrock CORS Sites
Land Subsidence Monitoring Report 28
Añ
Añ?Ñ
Iv
Iv
Usery Mountain CORS
San Tan Mountain CORS
0 25 50 75 10012.5Miles
Active Land Subsidence AreaInSAR Frames
Highways and InterstatesInterstateUSState
µ1:2,832,259
Figure 18 - Current Satellite Frames Used by ADWR to Collect InSAR Data in ArizonaInSAR Data is Collected, Processed, and Analyzed
By the Geophysics/Surveying Unit of the Hydrology Division
Land Subsidence Monitoring Report 29Note: Not all InSAR Frames (Big Chino/Prescott Area) are showing active land subsidence at this time