Transcript
  • LONGHORN ARMY AMMUNITION PLANT

    KARNACK, TEXAS

    ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD

    Volume 4 of 16

    2011

    Bate Stamp Numbers 00101493 – 00102505

    Prepared for

    Department of the Army Longhorn Army Ammunition Plant

    1976 – 2011

  • LONGHORN ARMY AMMUNITION PLANT KARNACK, TEXAS

    ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD – CHRONOLOGICAL INDEX

    VOLUME 4 of 16 2011 A. Title: Report (continued) – Final Feasibility Study LHAAP-47, Plant 3 Area, Group 4, Longhorn Army Ammunition Plant, Karnack, Texas Author(s): Shaw Environmental, Inc., Houston, Texas Recipient: All Stakeholders Date: July 27, 2011 Bate Stamp: 00101493 - 00102505

  • 156 Starlite Drive, Marietta, OH 45750 • TEL 740-373-4071 • FAX 740-373-4835 • http://www.kemron.com

    Laboratory Report Number: L0710596

    Please find enclosed the analytical results for the samples you submitted to KEMRON Environmental Services.

    Review and compilation of your report was completed by KEMRON’s Sales and Service Team. If you have questions,comments or require further assistance regarding this report, please contact your team member noted in the reviewedbox bleow at 800-373-4071. Team member e-mail addresses also appear here for your convenience.

    Debra Elliott - Team Leader Amanda Fickiesen - Client Services [email protected] [email protected]

    Kathy Albertson - Team Chemist/Data Specialist Annie Brown - Client Services [email protected] [email protected]

    Stephanie Mossburg - Team Chemist/Data Specialist Katie Barnes - Team [email protected] [email protected]

    Brenda Gregory - Client Services Specialist Jacqueline Parsons - Team [email protected] [email protected]

    This report was reviewed on November 02, 2007.

    STEPHANIE MOSSBURG - Team Chemist/Data Specialist

    I certify that all test results meet all of the requirements of the NELAP standards and other applicable contract termsand conditions. All results for soil samples are reported on a ’dry-weight’ basis unless specified otherwise. Analyticalresults for water and wastes are reported on a ’as received’ basis unless specified otherwise. A statement of uncertaintyfor each analysis is available upon request. This laboratory report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without thewritten approval of KEMRON Environmental Services.

    This report was certified on November 02, 2007.

    David Vandenberg - Vice President

    FL DOH NELAP ID: E8755This report contains a total of 321 pages.

    Protecting Our Environmental Future

    Page 1

    00101493

  • KEMRON REPORT L0710596PREPARED FOR Shaw E I, Inc.WORK ID: LONGHORN AAP KARNACK TX

    1.0 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32.1 Volatiles Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39

    2.1.1 Volatiles GCMS Data (8260) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 402.1.1.1 Summary Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 412.1.1.2 QC Summary Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67

    2.2 Metals Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1442.2.1 Metals I C P Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .145

    2.2.1.1 Summary Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1462.2.1.2 QC Summary Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 151

    2.2.2 Metals ICP-MS Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1942.2.2.1 Summary Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1952.2.2.2 QC Summary Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 200

    2.2.3 Metals CVAA Data (Mercury) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2352.2.3.1 Summary Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2362.2.3.2 QC Summary Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 240

    2.3 General Chemistry Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2622.3.1 Perchlorate Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 263

    2.3.1.1 Summary Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2642.3.1.2 QC Summary Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 271

    2.3.2 Total Dissolved Solids Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2812.3.2.1 Summary Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2822.3.2.2 QC Summary Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2862.3.2.3 Raw Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 293

    2.3.3 Total Suspended Solids Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2962.3.3.1 Summary Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2972.3.3.2 QC Summary Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3012.3.3.3 Raw Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 308

    3.0 Attachments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 311

    Page 2

    00101494

  • 1.0 Introduction

    Page 3

    00101495

  • ID: 63618

    KEMRON ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICESREPORT NARRATIVE

    KEMRON Login No.: L0710596

    CHAIN OF CUSTODY: The chain of custody number was 10305.

    SHIPMENT CONDITIONS: The chain of custody forms were received sealed in a cooler. The cooler temperaturewas 4 degrees C.

    SAMPLE MANAGEMENT: All samples received were intact.

    I certify that this data package is in compliance with the terms and conditions agreed to by the client and KEMRONEnvironmental Services, both technically and for completeness, except for the conditions noted above. Release of thedata contained in this hardcopy data package has been authorized by the Laboratory Manager or designated person,as verified by the following signature.

    Approved: 25-OCT-07

    Page 4

    00101496

  • Laboratory Data Package Cover Page

    This data Package consists of:This signature page, the laboratory review checklists, and the following reportable data:R1 Field chain-of-custody documentation;R2 sample identification cross-reference;R3 Test reports (analytical data sheets) for each enviornmental sample that includes:

    a) Items consistant with NELAC 5.13 or ISO/IEC 17025 Section 5.10b) dilution factors,c) preparation methods,d) Cleanup methods, ande) If required for the project, tentatively identified compounds (TICs)

    R4 Surrogate recovery data including:a) Calculated recovery (%R) for each analyte, andb) The laboratory’s surrogate QC limits.

    R5 Test reports/summary forms for blank samples;R6 Test reports/summary forms FOR laboratory control samples (LCSs) including:

    a) LCS spiking amount,b) Calculated %R for each analyte, andc) The laboratory”s LCS QC limits.

    R7 Test reports for project matrix spike/matrix spike duplicates (MS/MSDs) including:a) Samples associated with the MS/MSD clearly identified,b) MS/MSD spiking amounts,c) Concentration of each MS/MSD analyte measured in the parent and spiked samples,d) Calculated %R and relative percent differences (RPDs), ande) The laboratory’s MS/MSD QC limits

    R8 Laboratory analytical duplicate (if applicable) revocery and precision:a) the amount of analyte measured in the duplicate,b) the calculated RPD, andc) the laboratory’s QC limits for anlytical duplicates.

    R9 List of method quantitation limits (MQLs) for each analyte for each method and matrix;R10 Other problems or anomalies.The exception Report for every ”No” or ”Not Reviewed (NR)” item in laboratory review checklist.

    Release statement: I am responsible for the release of this laboratory data package. This data package has been reviewed by thelaboratory and is complete and technically compliant with the requirements of the methods used, except where noted by the laboratoryin the attached exceptions reports. By my signature below, I affirm to the best of my knowledge, all problems/anomalies, observed bythe laboratory as having the potential to affect the quality of the data, have been identified by the laboratoy in the Laboratory ReviewChecklist, and no information or data have been knowingly withheld that would affect the quality of the data.

    Check, If applicable: [] This laboratory is an in-house laboratory controlled by the person repsonding to rule. The official signing thecover page of the rule-required report (for example, the APAR) in which these data are used is responsible for releasing this datapackage and is by signature affirming the above release statement is trus.

    SHERI L. PFALZGRAF Chemist II November 2, 2007

    Name (Printed) Signature Official Title (printed) DATE

    RG-366/TRRP-13 December 2002 A1

    Page 5

    00101497

  • Checklist ID: 22886

    KEMRON Environmental ServicesLaboratory Review Checklist

    Laboratory Name: KEMRONLaboratory Log Number: L0710596Project Name: 798-LONGHORNMethod: 6020Prep Batch Number(s): WG253712Reviewer Name: SHERI L. PFALZGRAFLRC Date: November 02, 2007

    Description Yes No NA(1) NR(2) ER(3)

    Chain-Of-Custody (C-O-C)Did samples meet the laboratory’s standard conditions of sample acceptability uponreceipt?

    X

    Were all departures from standard conditions described in an exception report? XSample and quality control (QC) identificationAre all field sample ID numbers cross-referenced to the laboratory ID numbers? XAre all laboratory ID numbers cross-referenced to the corresponding QC data? XTest reportsWere all samples prepared and analyzed within holding times? XOther than those results

  • Description Yes No NA(1) NR(2) ER(3)

    Were MS/MSD RPDs within laboratory QC limits? XAnalytical duplicate dataWere appropriate analytical duplicates analyzed for each matrix? XWere analytical duplicates analyzed at the appropriate frequency? XWere RPDs or relative standard deviations within the laboratory QC limits? XMethod quantitation limits (MQLs):Are the MQLs for each method analyte included in the laboratory data package? XDo the MQLs correspond to the concentration of the lowest non-zero calibration standard? XAre unadjusted MQLs included in the laboratory data package? X 1Other problems/anomaliesAre all known problems/anomalies/special conditions noted in this LRC and ER? XWere all necessary corrective actions performed for the reported data? XWas applicable and available technology used to lower the SQL minimize the matrixinterference affects on the sample results?

    X

    ICALWere response factors and/or relative response factors for each analyte within QC limits? XWere percent RSDs or correlation coefficient criteria met? XWas the number of standards recommended in the method used for all analytes? XWere all points generated between the lowest and highest standard used to calculate thecurve?

    X

    Are ICAL data available for all instruments used? XHas the initial calibration curve been verified using an appropriate second source standard? XInitial and continuing calibration verification (ICV and CCV) and continuingcalibration blank (CCB):Was the CCV analyzed at the method-required frequency? XWere percent differences for each analyte within the method-required QC limits? XWas the ICAL curve verified for each analyte? XWas the absolute value of the analyte concentration in the inorganic CCB

  • Description Yes No NA(1) NR(2) ER(3)

    Standards documentationAre all standards used in the analyses NIST-traceable or obtained from other appropriatesources?

    X

    Compound/analyte identification proceduresAre the procedures for compound/analyte identification documented? XDemonstration of analyst competency (DOC)Was DOC conducted consistent with NELAC Chapter 5C or ISO/IEC 4? XIs documentation of the analyst’s competency up-to-date and on file? XVerification/validation documentation for methods (NELAC Chap 5 or ISO/IEC17025 Section 5)Are all the methods used to generate the data documented, verified, and validated, whereapplicable?

    X

    Laboratory standard operating procedures (SOPs):Are laboratory SOPs current and on file for each method performed? X

    Page 8

    00101500

  • Checklist ID: 22886

    KEMRON Environmental ServicesLaboratory Review Checklist

    Laboratory Name: KEMRONLaboratory Log Number: L0710596Project Name: 798-LONGHORNMethod: 6020Prep Batch Number(s): WG253712Reviewer Name: SHERI L. PFALZGRAFLRC Date: November 02, 2007

    EXCEPTIONS REPORTER1 - Due to a result that exceeded the linear range on initial analysis, client sample 12 was reported from a dilution analysisfor sodium. Due to a result that was noncompliant on the negative side on initial analysis, sample 12 was reported from adilution analysis for vanadium. Due to a result that exceeded the linear range of the instrument in the reference sample to theMS/MSD, the reference, MS, and MSD were reported from dilution analyses for sodium. Due to results that were noncomplianton the negative side in the reference sample to the MS/MSD, the reference, MS, and MSD were reported from dilution analysesfor aluminum and vanadium.Footnotes:(1) NA = Not applicable to method or project(2) NR = Not reviewed(3) ER# = Exception report number

    Page 9

    00101501

  • Laboratory Data Package Cover Page

    This data Package consists of:This signature page, the laboratory review checklists, and the following reportable data:R1 Field chain-of-custody documentation;R2 sample identification cross-reference;R3 Test reports (analytical data sheets) for each enviornmental sample that includes:

    a) Items consistant with NELAC 5.13 or ISO/IEC 17025 Section 5.10b) dilution factors,c) preparation methods,d) Cleanup methods, ande) If required for the project, tentatively identified compounds (TICs)

    R4 Surrogate recovery data including:a) Calculated recovery (%R) for each analyte, andb) The laboratory’s surrogate QC limits.

    R5 Test reports/summary forms for blank samples;R6 Test reports/summary forms FOR laboratory control samples (LCSs) including:

    a) LCS spiking amount,b) Calculated %R for each analyte, andc) The laboratory”s LCS QC limits.

    R7 Test reports for project matrix spike/matrix spike duplicates (MS/MSDs) including:a) Samples associated with the MS/MSD clearly identified,b) MS/MSD spiking amounts,c) Concentration of each MS/MSD analyte measured in the parent and spiked samples,d) Calculated %R and relative percent differences (RPDs), ande) The laboratory’s MS/MSD QC limits

    R8 Laboratory analytical duplicate (if applicable) revocery and precision:a) the amount of analyte measured in the duplicate,b) the calculated RPD, andc) the laboratory’s QC limits for anlytical duplicates.

    R9 List of method quantitation limits (MQLs) for each analyte for each method and matrix;R10 Other problems or anomalies.The exception Report for every ”No” or ”Not Reviewed (NR)” item in laboratory review checklist.

    Release statement: I am responsible for the release of this laboratory data package. This data package has been reviewed by thelaboratory and is complete and technically compliant with the requirements of the methods used, except where noted by the laboratoryin the attached exceptions reports. By my signature below, I affirm to the best of my knowledge, all problems/anomalies, observed bythe laboratory as having the potential to affect the quality of the data, have been identified by the laboratoy in the Laboratory ReviewChecklist, and no information or data have been knowingly withheld that would affect the quality of the data.

    Check, If applicable: [] This laboratory is an in-house laboratory controlled by the person repsonding to rule. The official signing thecover page of the rule-required report (for example, the APAR) in which these data are used is responsible for releasing this datapackage and is by signature affirming the above release statement is trus.

    MAREN M. BEERY Metals Supervisor November 1, 2007

    Name (Printed) Signature Official Title (printed) DATE

    RG-366/TRRP-13 December 2002 A1

    Page 10

    00101502

  • Checklist ID: 22866

    KEMRON Environmental ServicesLaboratory Review Checklist

    Laboratory Name: KEMRONLaboratory Log Number: L0710596Project Name: 798-LONGHORNMethod: 6010Prep Batch Number(s): WG253902Reviewer Name: MAREN M. BEERYLRC Date: November 01, 2007

    Description Yes No NA(1) NR(2) ER(3)

    Chain-Of-Custody (C-O-C)Did samples meet the laboratory’s standard conditions of sample acceptability uponreceipt?

    X

    Were all departures from standard conditions described in an exception report? XSample and quality control (QC) identificationAre all field sample ID numbers cross-referenced to the laboratory ID numbers? XAre all laboratory ID numbers cross-referenced to the corresponding QC data? XTest reportsWere all samples prepared and analyzed within holding times? XOther than those results

  • Description Yes No NA(1) NR(2) ER(3)

    Were MS/MSD RPDs within laboratory QC limits? XAnalytical duplicate dataWere appropriate analytical duplicates analyzed for each matrix? XWere analytical duplicates analyzed at the appropriate frequency? XWere RPDs or relative standard deviations within the laboratory QC limits? XMethod quantitation limits (MQLs):Are the MQLs for each method analyte included in the laboratory data package? XDo the MQLs correspond to the concentration of the lowest non-zero calibration standard? XAre unadjusted MQLs included in the laboratory data package? XOther problems/anomaliesAre all known problems/anomalies/special conditions noted in this LRC and ER? XWere all necessary corrective actions performed for the reported data? XWas applicable and available technology used to lower the SQL minimize the matrixinterference affects on the sample results?

    X ER2

    ICALWere response factors and/or relative response factors for each analyte within QC limits? XWere percent RSDs or correlation coefficient criteria met? XWas the number of standards recommended in the method used for all analytes? XWere all points generated between the lowest and highest standard used to calculate thecurve?

    X

    Are ICAL data available for all instruments used? XHas the initial calibration curve been verified using an appropriate second source standard? XInitial and continuing calibration verification (ICV and CCV) and continuingcalibration blank (CCB):Was the CCV analyzed at the method-required frequency? XWere percent differences for each analyte within the method-required QC limits? XWas the ICAL curve verified for each analyte? XWas the absolute value of the analyte concentration in the inorganic CCB

  • Description Yes No NA(1) NR(2) ER(3)

    Standards documentationAre all standards used in the analyses NIST-traceable or obtained from other appropriatesources?

    X

    Compound/analyte identification proceduresAre the procedures for compound/analyte identification documented? XDemonstration of analyst competency (DOC)Was DOC conducted consistent with NELAC Chapter 5C or ISO/IEC 4? XIs documentation of the analyst’s competency up-to-date and on file? XVerification/validation documentation for methods (NELAC Chap 5 or ISO/IEC17025 Section 5)Are all the methods used to generate the data documented, verified, and validated, whereapplicable?

    X

    Laboratory standard operating procedures (SOPs):Are laboratory SOPs current and on file for each method performed? X

    Page 13

    00101505

  • Checklist ID: 22866

    KEMRON Environmental ServicesLaboratory Review Checklist

    Laboratory Name: KEMRONLaboratory Log Number: L0710596Project Name: 798-LONGHORNMethod: 6010Prep Batch Number(s): WG253902Reviewer Name: MAREN M. BEERYLRC Date: November 01, 2007

    EXCEPTIONS REPORTER#1 - Due to a result that exceeded the linear range on initial analysis, client sample 12 was reported from a dilution analysisfor sodium.ER2 - Due to a result that was noncompliant on the negative side on initial analysis, sample 12 was reported from a dilutionanalysis for vanadium.Footnotes:(1) NA = Not applicable to method or project(2) NR = Not reviewed(3) ER# = Exception report number

    Page 14

    00101506

  • Laboratory Data Package Cover Page

    This data Package consists of:This signature page, the laboratory review checklists, and the following reportable data:R1 Field chain-of-custody documentation;R2 sample identification cross-reference;R3 Test reports (analytical data sheets) for each enviornmental sample that includes:

    a) Items consistant with NELAC 5.13 or ISO/IEC 17025 Section 5.10b) dilution factors,c) preparation methods,d) Cleanup methods, ande) If required for the project, tentatively identified compounds (TICs)

    R4 Surrogate recovery data including:a) Calculated recovery (%R) for each analyte, andb) The laboratory’s surrogate QC limits.

    R5 Test reports/summary forms for blank samples;R6 Test reports/summary forms FOR laboratory control samples (LCSs) including:

    a) LCS spiking amount,b) Calculated %R for each analyte, andc) The laboratory”s LCS QC limits.

    R7 Test reports for project matrix spike/matrix spike duplicates (MS/MSDs) including:a) Samples associated with the MS/MSD clearly identified,b) MS/MSD spiking amounts,c) Concentration of each MS/MSD analyte measured in the parent and spiked samples,d) Calculated %R and relative percent differences (RPDs), ande) The laboratory’s MS/MSD QC limits

    R8 Laboratory analytical duplicate (if applicable) revocery and precision:a) the amount of analyte measured in the duplicate,b) the calculated RPD, andc) the laboratory’s QC limits for anlytical duplicates.

    R9 List of method quantitation limits (MQLs) for each analyte for each method and matrix;R10 Other problems or anomalies.The exception Report for every ”No” or ”Not Reviewed (NR)” item in laboratory review checklist.

    Release statement: I am responsible for the release of this laboratory data package. This data package has been reviewed by thelaboratory and is complete and technically compliant with the requirements of the methods used, except where noted by the laboratoryin the attached exceptions reports. By my signature below, I affirm to the best of my knowledge, all problems/anomalies, observed bythe laboratory as having the potential to affect the quality of the data, have been identified by the laboratoy in the Laboratory ReviewChecklist, and no information or data have been knowingly withheld that would affect the quality of the data.

    Check, If applicable: [] This laboratory is an in-house laboratory controlled by the person repsonding to rule. The official signing thecover page of the rule-required report (for example, the APAR) in which these data are used is responsible for releasing this datapackage and is by signature affirming the above release statement is trus.

    MAREN M. BEERY Metals Supervisor October 25, 2007

    Name (Printed) Signature Official Title (printed) DATE

    RG-366/TRRP-13 December 2002 A1

    Page 15

    00101507

  • Checklist ID: 22650

    KEMRON Environmental ServicesLaboratory Review Checklist

    Laboratory Name: KEMRONLaboratory Log Number: L0710596Project Name: 798-LONGHORNMethod: 7471Prep Batch Number(s): WG253689Reviewer Name: MAREN M. BEERYLRC Date: October 25, 2007

    Description Yes No NA(1) NR(2) ER(3)

    Chain-Of-Custody (C-O-C)Did samples meet the laboratory’s standard conditions of sample acceptability uponreceipt?

    X

    Were all departures from standard conditions described in an exception report? XSample and quality control (QC) identificationAre all field sample ID numbers cross-referenced to the laboratory ID numbers? XAre all laboratory ID numbers cross-referenced to the corresponding QC data? XTest reportsWere all samples prepared and analyzed within holding times? XOther than those results

  • Description Yes No NA(1) NR(2) ER(3)

    Were MS/MSD RPDs within laboratory QC limits? XAnalytical duplicate dataWere appropriate analytical duplicates analyzed for each matrix? XWere analytical duplicates analyzed at the appropriate frequency? XWere RPDs or relative standard deviations within the laboratory QC limits? XMethod quantitation limits (MQLs):Are the MQLs for each method analyte included in the laboratory data package? XDo the MQLs correspond to the concentration of the lowest non-zero calibration standard? XAre unadjusted MQLs included in the laboratory data package? XOther problems/anomaliesAre all known problems/anomalies/special conditions noted in this LRC and ER? XWere all necessary corrective actions performed for the reported data? XWas applicable and available technology used to lower the SQL minimize the matrixinterference affects on the sample results?

    X

    ICALWere response factors and/or relative response factors for each analyte within QC limits? XWere percent RSDs or correlation coefficient criteria met? XWas the number of standards recommended in the method used for all analytes? XWere all points generated between the lowest and highest standard used to calculate thecurve?

    X

    Are ICAL data available for all instruments used? XHas the initial calibration curve been verified using an appropriate second source standard? XInitial and continuing calibration verification (ICV and CCV) and continuingcalibration blank (CCB):Was the CCV analyzed at the method-required frequency? XWere percent differences for each analyte within the method-required QC limits? XWas the ICAL curve verified for each analyte? XWas the absolute value of the analyte concentration in the inorganic CCB

  • Description Yes No NA(1) NR(2) ER(3)

    Standards documentationAre all standards used in the analyses NIST-traceable or obtained from other appropriatesources?

    X

    Compound/analyte identification proceduresAre the procedures for compound/analyte identification documented? XDemonstration of analyst competency (DOC)Was DOC conducted consistent with NELAC Chapter 5C or ISO/IEC 4? XIs documentation of the analyst’s competency up-to-date and on file? XVerification/validation documentation for methods (NELAC Chap 5 or ISO/IEC17025 Section 5)Are all the methods used to generate the data documented, verified, and validated, whereapplicable?

    X

    Laboratory standard operating procedures (SOPs):Are laboratory SOPs current and on file for each method performed? X

    Page 18

    00101510

  • Checklist ID: 22650

    KEMRON Environmental ServicesLaboratory Review Checklist

    Laboratory Name: KEMRONLaboratory Log Number: L0710596Project Name: 798-LONGHORNMethod: 7471Prep Batch Number(s): WG253689Reviewer Name: MAREN M. BEERYLRC Date: October 25, 2007

    EXCEPTIONS REPORTER# - DescriptionFootnotes:(1) NA = Not applicable to method or project(2) NR = Not reviewed(3) ER# = Exception report number

    Page 19

    00101511

  • Laboratory Data Package Cover Page

    This data Package consists of:This signature page, the laboratory review checklists, and the following reportable data:R1 Field chain-of-custody documentation;R2 sample identification cross-reference;R3 Test reports (analytical data sheets) for each enviornmental sample that includes:

    a) Items consistant with NELAC 5.13 or ISO/IEC 17025 Section 5.10b) dilution factors,c) preparation methods,d) Cleanup methods, ande) If required for the project, tentatively identified compounds (TICs)

    R4 Surrogate recovery data including:a) Calculated recovery (%R) for each analyte, andb) The laboratory’s surrogate QC limits.

    XR5 Test reports/summary forms for blank samples;XR6 Test reports/summary forms for laboratory control samples (LCSs) including:

    a) LCS spiking amount,b) Calculated %R for each analyte, andc) The laboratory”s LCS QC limits.

    R7 Test reports for project matrix spike/matrix spike duplicates (MS/MSDs) including:a) Samples associated with the MS/MSD clearly identified,b) MS/MSD spiking amounts,c) Concentration of each MS/MSD analyte measured in the parent and spiked samples,d) Calculated %R and relative percent differences (RPDs), ande) The laboratory’s MS/MSD QC limits

    R8 Laboratory analytical duplicate (if applicable) revocery and precision:a) the amount of analyte measured in the duplicate,b) the calculated RPD, andc) the laboratory’s QC limits for anlytical duplicates.

    R9 List of method quantitation limits (MQLs) for each analyte for each method and matrix;R10 Other problems or anomalies.The exception Report for every ”No” or ”Not Reviewed (NR)” item in laboratory review checklist.

    Release statement: I am responsible for the release of this laboratory data package. This data package has been reviewed by thelaboratory and is complete and technically compliant with the requirements of the methods used, except where noted by the laboratoryin the attached exceptions reports. By my signature below, I affirm to the best of my knowledge, all problems/anomalies, observed bythe laboratory as having the potential to affect the quality of the data, have been identified by the laboratoy in the Laboratory ReviewChecklist, and no information or data have been knowingly withheld that would affect the quality of the data.

    Check, If applicable: [] This laboratory is an in-house laboratory controlled by the person repsonding to rule. The official signing thecover page of the rule-required report (for example, the APAR) in which these data are used is responsible for releasing this datapackage and is by signature affirming the above release statement is trus.

    DEANNA I. HESSON Conventional Lab Supervisor October 29, 2007

    Name (Printed) Signature Official Title (printed) DATE

    RG-366/TRRP-13 December 2002 A1

    Page 20

    00101512

  • Checklist ID: 22738

    KEMRON Environmental ServicesLaboratory Review Checklist

    Laboratory Name: KEMRONLaboratory Log Number: L0710596Project Name: 798-LONGHORNMethod: TDSPrep Batch Number(s): WG253612Reviewer Name: DEANNA I. HESSONLRC Date: October 29, 2007

    Description Yes No NA(1) NR(2) ER(3)

    Chain-Of-Custody (C-O-C)Did samples meet the laboratory’s standard conditions of sample acceptability uponreceipt?

    X

    Were all departures from standard conditions described in an exception report? XSample and quality control (QC) identificationAre all field sample ID numbers cross-referenced to the laboratory ID numbers? XAre all laboratory ID numbers cross-referenced to the corresponding QC data? XTest reportsWere all samples prepared and analyzed within holding times? XOther than those results

  • Description Yes No NA(1) NR(2) ER(3)

    Were MS/MSD RPDs within laboratory QC limits? XAnalytical duplicate dataWere appropriate analytical duplicates analyzed for each matrix? XWere analytical duplicates analyzed at the appropriate frequency? XWere RPDs or relative standard deviations within the laboratory QC limits? XMethod quantitation limits (MQLs):Are the MQLs for each method analyte included in the laboratory data package? XDo the MQLs correspond to the concentration of the lowest non-zero calibration standard? XAre unadjusted MQLs included in the laboratory data package? XOther problems/anomaliesAre all known problems/anomalies/special conditions noted in this LRC and ER? XWere all necessary corrective actions performed for the reported data? XWas applicable and available technology used to lower the SQL minimize the matrixinterference affects on the sample results?

    X

    Were response factors and/or relative response factors for each analyte within QC limits? XWere percent RSDs or correlation coefficient criteria met? XWas the number of standards recommended in the method used for all analytes? XWere all points generated between the lowest and highest standard used to calculate thecurve?

    X

    Are ICAL data available for all instruments used? XHas the initial calibration curve been verified using an appropriate second source standard? XInitial and continuing calibration verification (ICV and CCV) and continuingcalibration blank (CCB):Was the CCV analyzed at the method-required frequency? XWere percent differences for each analyte within the method-required QC limits? XWas the ICAL curve verified for each analyte? XWas the absolute value of the analyte concentration in the inorganic CCB

  • Description Yes No NA(1) NR(2) ER(3)

    Standards documentationAre all standards used in the analyses NIST-traceable or obtained from other appropriatesources?

    X

    Compound/analyte identification proceduresAre the procedures for compound/analyte identification documented? XDemonstration of analyst competency (DOC)Was DOC conducted consistent with NELAC Chapter 5C or ISO/IEC 4? XIs documentation of the analyst’s competency up-to-date and on file? XVerification/validation documentation for methods (NELAC Chap 5 or ISO/IEC17025 Section 5)Are all the methods used to generate the data documented, verified, and validated, whereapplicable?

    X

    Laboratory standard operating procedures (SOPs):Are laboratory SOPs current and on file for each method performed? X

    Page 23

    00101515

  • Checklist ID: 22738

    KEMRON Environmental ServicesLaboratory Review Checklist

    Laboratory Name: KEMRONLaboratory Log Number: L0710596Project Name: 798-LONGHORNMethod: TDSPrep Batch Number(s): WG253612Reviewer Name: DEANNA I. HESSONLRC Date: October 29, 2007

    EXCEPTIONS REPORTER# - DescriptionFootnotes:(1) NA = Not applicable to method or project(2) NR = Not reviewed(3) ER# = Exception report number

    Page 24

    00101516

  • Laboratory Data Package Cover Page

    This data Package consists of:This signature page, the laboratory review checklists, and the following reportable data:R1 Field chain-of-custody documentation;R2 sample identification cross-reference;R3 Test reports (analytical data sheets) for each enviornmental sample that includes:

    a) Items consistant with NELAC 5.13 or ISO/IEC 17025 Section 5.10b) dilution factors,c) preparation methods,d) Cleanup methods, ande) If required for the project, tentatively identified compounds (TICs)

    R4 Surrogate recovery data including:a) Calculated recovery (%R) for each analyte, andb) The laboratory’s surrogate QC limits.

    XR5 Test reports/summary forms for blank samples;XR6 Test reports/summary forms for laboratory control samples (LCSs) including:

    a) LCS spiking amount,b) Calculated %R for each analyte, andc) The laboratory”s LCS QC limits.

    R7 Test reports for project matrix spike/matrix spike duplicates (MS/MSDs) including:a) Samples associated with the MS/MSD clearly identified,b) MS/MSD spiking amounts,c) Concentration of each MS/MSD analyte measured in the parent and spiked samples,d) Calculated %R and relative percent differences (RPDs), ande) The laboratory’s MS/MSD QC limits

    R8 Laboratory analytical duplicate (if applicable) revocery and precision:a) the amount of analyte measured in the duplicate,b) the calculated RPD, andc) the laboratory’s QC limits for anlytical duplicates.

    R9 List of method quantitation limits (MQLs) for each analyte for each method and matrix;R10 Other problems or anomalies.The exception Report for every ”No” or ”Not Reviewed (NR)” item in laboratory review checklist.

    Release statement: I am responsible for the release of this laboratory data package. This data package has been reviewed by thelaboratory and is complete and technically compliant with the requirements of the methods used, except where noted by the laboratoryin the attached exceptions reports. By my signature below, I affirm to the best of my knowledge, all problems/anomalies, observed bythe laboratory as having the potential to affect the quality of the data, have been identified by the laboratoy in the Laboratory ReviewChecklist, and no information or data have been knowingly withheld that would affect the quality of the data.

    Check, If applicable: [] This laboratory is an in-house laboratory controlled by the person repsonding to rule. The official signing thecover page of the rule-required report (for example, the APAR) in which these data are used is responsible for releasing this datapackage and is by signature affirming the above release statement is trus.

    DEANNA I. HESSON Conventional Lab Supervisor October 29, 2007

    Name (Printed) Signature Official Title (printed) DATE

    RG-366/TRRP-13 December 2002 A1

    Page 25

    00101517

  • Checklist ID: 22739

    KEMRON Environmental ServicesLaboratory Review Checklist

    Laboratory Name: KEMRONLaboratory Log Number: L0710596Project Name: 798-LONGHORNMethod: TSSPrep Batch Number(s): WG253700Reviewer Name: DEANNA I. HESSONLRC Date: October 29, 2007

    Description Yes No NA(1) NR(2) ER(3)

    Chain-Of-Custody (C-O-C)Did samples meet the laboratory’s standard conditions of sample acceptability uponreceipt?

    X

    Were all departures from standard conditions described in an exception report? XSample and quality control (QC) identificationAre all field sample ID numbers cross-referenced to the laboratory ID numbers? XAre all laboratory ID numbers cross-referenced to the corresponding QC data? XTest reportsWere all samples prepared and analyzed within holding times? XOther than those results

  • Description Yes No NA(1) NR(2) ER(3)

    Were MS/MSD RPDs within laboratory QC limits? XAnalytical duplicate dataWere appropriate analytical duplicates analyzed for each matrix? XWere analytical duplicates analyzed at the appropriate frequency? XWere RPDs or relative standard deviations within the laboratory QC limits? XMethod quantitation limits (MQLs):Are the MQLs for each method analyte included in the laboratory data package? XDo the MQLs correspond to the concentration of the lowest non-zero calibration standard? XAre unadjusted MQLs included in the laboratory data package? XOther problems/anomaliesAre all known problems/anomalies/special conditions noted in this LRC and ER? XWere all necessary corrective actions performed for the reported data? XWas applicable and available technology used to lower the SQL minimize the matrixinterference affects on the sample results?

    X

    Were response factors and/or relative response factors for each analyte within QC limits? XWere percent RSDs or correlation coefficient criteria met? XWas the number of standards recommended in the method used for all analytes? XWere all points generated between the lowest and highest standard used to calculate thecurve?

    X

    Are ICAL data available for all instruments used? XHas the initial calibration curve been verified using an appropriate second source standard? XInitial and continuing calibration verification (ICV and CCV) and continuingcalibration blank (CCB):Was the CCV analyzed at the method-required frequency? XWere percent differences for each analyte within the method-required QC limits? XWas the ICAL curve verified for each analyte? XWas the absolute value of the analyte concentration in the inorganic CCB

  • Description Yes No NA(1) NR(2) ER(3)

    Standards documentationAre all standards used in the analyses NIST-traceable or obtained from other appropriatesources?

    X

    Compound/analyte identification proceduresAre the procedures for compound/analyte identification documented? XDemonstration of analyst competency (DOC)Was DOC conducted consistent with NELAC Chapter 5C or ISO/IEC 4? XIs documentation of the analyst’s competency up-to-date and on file? XVerification/validation documentation for methods (NELAC Chap 5 or ISO/IEC17025 Section 5)Are all the methods used to generate the data documented, verified, and validated, whereapplicable?

    X

    Laboratory standard operating procedures (SOPs):Are laboratory SOPs current and on file for each method performed? X

    Page 28

    00101520

  • Checklist ID: 22739

    KEMRON Environmental ServicesLaboratory Review Checklist

    Laboratory Name: KEMRONLaboratory Log Number: L0710596Project Name: 798-LONGHORNMethod: TSSPrep Batch Number(s): WG253700Reviewer Name: DEANNA I. HESSONLRC Date: October 29, 2007

    EXCEPTIONS REPORTER# - DescriptionFootnotes:(1) NA = Not applicable to method or project(2) NR = Not reviewed(3) ER# = Exception report number

    Page 29

    00101521

  • Laboratory Data Package Cover Page

    This data Package consists of:This signature page, the laboratory review checklists, and the following reportable data:R1 Field chain-of-custody documentation;R2 sample identification cross-reference;R3 Test reports (analytical data sheets) for each enviornmental sample that includes:

    a) Items consistant with NELAC 5.13 or ISO/IEC 17025 Section 5.10b) dilution factors,c) preparation methods,d) Cleanup methods, ande) If required for the project, tentatively identified compounds (TICs)

    R4 Surrogate recovery data including:a) Calculated recovery (%R) for each analyte, andb) The laboratory’s surrogate QC limits.

    XR5 Test reports/summary forms for blank samples;XR6 Test reports/summary forms for laboratory control samples (LCSs) including:

    a) LCS spiking amount,b) Calculated %R for each analyte, andc) The laboratory”s LCS QC limits.

    R7 Test reports for project matrix spike/matrix spike duplicates (MS/MSDs) including:a) Samples associated with the MS/MSD clearly identified,b) MS/MSD spiking amounts,c) Concentration of each MS/MSD analyte measured in the parent and spiked samples,d) Calculated %R and relative percent differences (RPDs), ande) The laboratory’s MS/MSD QC limits

    XR8 Laboratory analytical duplicate (if applicable) revocery and precision:a) the amount of analyte measured in the duplicate,b) the calculated RPD, andc) the laboratory’s QC limits for anlytical duplicates.

    R9 List of method quantitation limits (MQLs) for each analyte for each method and matrix;R10 Other problems or anomalies.XThe exception Report for every ”No” or ”Not Reviewed (NR)” item IN laboratory review checklist.

    Release statement: I am responsible for the release of this laboratory data package. This data package has been reviewed by thelaboratory and is complete and technically compliant with the requirements of the methods used, except where noted by the laboratoryin the attached exceptions reports. By my signature below, I affirm to the best of my knowledge, all problems/anomalies, observed bythe laboratory as having the potential to affect the quality of the data, have been identified by the laboratoy in the Laboratory ReviewChecklist, and no information or data have been knowingly withheld that would affect the quality of the data.

    Check, If applicable: [] This laboratory is an in-house laboratory controlled by the person repsonding to rule. The official signing thecover page of the rule-required report (for example, the APAR) in which these data are used is responsible for releasing this datapackage and is by signature affirming the above release statement is trus.

    MICHAEL D. COCHRAN Semivolatiles Lab Supervisor October 30, 2007

    Name (Printed) Signature Official Title (printed) DATE

    RG-366/TRRP-13 December 2002 A1

    Page 30

    00101522

  • Checklist ID: 22757

    KEMRON Environmental ServicesLaboratory Review Checklist

    Laboratory Name: KEMRONLaboratory Log Number: L0710596Project Name: 798-LONGHORNMethod: 314Prep Batch Number(s): WG254202Reviewer Name: MICHAEL D. COCHRANLRC Date: October 30, 2007

    Description Yes No NA(1) NR(2) ER(3)

    Chain-Of-Custody (C-O-C)Did samples meet the laboratory’s standard conditions of sample acceptability uponreceipt?

    X

    Were all departures from standard conditions described in an exception report? XSample and quality control (QC) identificationAre all field sample ID numbers cross-referenced to the laboratory ID numbers? XAre all laboratory ID numbers cross-referenced to the corresponding QC data? XTest reportsWere all samples prepared and analyzed within holding times? XOther than those results

  • Description Yes No NA(1) NR(2) ER(3)

    Were MS/MSD RPDs within laboratory QC limits? XAnalytical duplicate dataWere appropriate analytical duplicates analyzed for each matrix? XWere analytical duplicates analyzed at the appropriate frequency? XWere RPDs or relative standard deviations within the laboratory QC limits? XMethod quantitation limits (MQLs):Are the MQLs for each method analyte included in the laboratory data package? XDo the MQLs correspond to the concentration of the lowest non-zero calibration standard? XAre unadjusted MQLs included in the laboratory data package? XOther problems/anomaliesAre all known problems/anomalies/special conditions noted in this LRC and ER? XWere all necessary corrective actions performed for the reported data? XWas applicable and available technology used to lower the SQL minimize the matrixinterference affects on the sample results?

    X 2

    Were response factors and/or relative response factors for each analyte within QC limits? XWere percent RSDs or correlation coefficient criteria met? XWas the number of standards recommended in the method used for all analytes? XWere all points generated between the lowest and highest standard used to calculate thecurve?

    X

    Are ICAL data available for all instruments used? XHas the initial calibration curve been verified using an appropriate second source standard? XInitial and continuing calibration verification (ICV and CCV) and continuingcalibration blank (CCB):Was the CCV analyzed at the method-required frequency? XWere percent differences for each analyte within the method-required QC limits? XWas the ICAL curve verified for each analyte? XWas the absolute value of the analyte concentration in the inorganic CCB

  • Description Yes No NA(1) NR(2) ER(3)

    Standards documentationAre all standards used in the analyses NIST-traceable or obtained from other appropriatesources?

    X

    Compound/analyte identification proceduresAre the procedures for compound/analyte identification documented? XDemonstration of analyst competency (DOC)Was DOC conducted consistent with NELAC Chapter 5C or ISO/IEC 4? XIs documentation of the analyst’s competency up-to-date and on file? XVerification/validation documentation for methods (NELAC Chap 5 or ISO/IEC17025 Section 5)Are all the methods used to generate the data documented, verified, and validated, whereapplicable?

    X

    Laboratory standard operating procedures (SOPs):Are laboratory SOPs current and on file for each method performed? X

    Page 33

    00101525

  • Checklist ID: 22757

    KEMRON Environmental ServicesLaboratory Review Checklist

    Laboratory Name: KEMRONLaboratory Log Number: L0710596Project Name: 798-LONGHORNMethod: 314Prep Batch Number(s): WG254202Reviewer Name: MICHAEL D. COCHRANLRC Date: October 30, 2007

    EXCEPTIONS REPORTER# - Description1. The MS/MSD results were not associated with this sample delivery group.2. Samples -01, -03 and -04 were analyzed at a dilution only due to high conductivity readings.

    (1) NA = Not applicable to method or project(2) NR = Not reviewed(3) ER# = Exception report number

    Page 34

    00101526

  • Laboratory Data Package Cover Page

    This data Package consists of:This signature page, the laboratory review checklists, and the following reportable data:XR1 Field chain-of-custody documentation;XR2 sample identification cross-reference;R3 Test reports (analytical data sheets) for each enviornmental sample that includes:

    a) Items consistant with NELAC 5.13 or ISO/IEC 17025 Section 5.10b) dilution factors,c) preparation methods,d) Cleanup methods, ande) If required for the project, tentatively identified compounds (TICs)

    XR4 Surrogate recovery data including:a) Calculated recovery (%R) for each analyte, andb) The laboratory’s surrogate QC limits.

    XR5 Test reports/summary forms for blank samples;XR6 Test reports/summary forms for laboratory control samples (LCSs) including:

    a) LCS spiking amount,b) Calculated %R for each analyte, andc) The laboratory”s LCS QC limits.

    XR7 Test reports for project matrix spike/matrix spike duplicates (MS/MSDs) including:a) Samples associated with the MS/MSD clearly identified,b) MS/MSD spiking amounts,c) Concentration of each MS/MSD analyte measured in the parent and spiked samples,d) Calculated %R and relative percent differences (RPDs), ande) The laboratory’s MS/MSD QC limits

    XR8 Laboratory analytical duplicate (if applicable) revocery and precision:a) the amount of analyte measured in the duplicate,b) the calculated RPD, andc) the laboratory’s QC limits for anlytical duplicates.

    XR9 List of method quantitation limits (MQLs) for each analyte for each method and matrix;XR10 Other problems or anomalies.XThe exception Report for every ”No” or ”Not Reviewed (NR)” item IN laboratory review checklist.

    Release statement: I am responsible for the release of this laboratory data package. This data package has been reviewed by thelaboratory and is complete and technically compliant with the requirements of the methods used, except where noted by the laboratoryin the attached exceptions reports. By my signature below, I affirm to the best of my knowledge, all problems/anomalies, observed bythe laboratory as having the potential to affect the quality of the data, have been identified by the laboratoy in the Laboratory ReviewChecklist, and no information or data have been knowingly withheld that would affect the quality of the data.

    Check, if applicable: [X] This laboratory is an in-house laboratory controlled by the person repsonding to rule. The official signingthe cover page of the rule-required report (for example, the APAR) in which these data are used is responsible for releasing this datapackage and is by signature affirming the above release statement is true.

    MIKE D. ALBERTSON Volatiles Lab Supervisor October 30, 2007

    Name (Printed) Signature Official Title (printed) DATE

    RG-366/TRRP-13 December 2002 A1

    Page 35

    00101527

  • Checklist ID: 22781

    KEMRON Environmental ServicesLaboratory Review Checklist

    Laboratory Name: KEMRONLaboratory Log Number: L0710596Project Name: 798-LONGHORNMethod: 8260BPrep Batch Number(s): 253794, 254006, 253678Reviewer Name: MIKE D. ALBERTSONLRC Date: October 30, 2007

    Description Yes No NA(1) NR(2) ER(3)

    Chain-Of-Custody (C-O-C)Did samples meet the laboratory’s standard conditions of sample acceptability uponreceipt?

    X

    Were all departures from standard conditions described in an exception report? XSample and quality control (QC) identificationAre all field sample ID numbers cross-referenced to the laboratory ID numbers? XAre all laboratory ID numbers cross-referenced to the corresponding QC data? XTest reportsWere all samples prepared and analyzed within holding times? XOther than those results

  • Description Yes No NA(1) NR(2) ER(3)

    Were MS/MSD RPDs within laboratory QC limits? XAnalytical duplicate dataWere appropriate analytical duplicates analyzed for each matrix? XWere analytical duplicates analyzed at the appropriate frequency? XWere RPDs or relative standard deviations within the laboratory QC limits? XMethod quantitation limits (MQLs):Are the MQLs for each method analyte included in the laboratory data package? XDo the MQLs correspond to the concentration of the lowest non-zero calibration standard? XAre unadjusted MQLs included in the laboratory data package? XOther problems/anomaliesAre all known problems/anomalies/special conditions noted in this LRC and ER? XWere all necessary corrective actions performed for the reported data? XWas applicable and available technology used to lower the SQL minimize the matrixinterference affects on the sample results?

    X

    ICALWere response factors and/or relative response factors for each analyte within QC limits? XWere percent RSDs or correlation coefficient criteria met? XWas the number of standards recommended in the method used for all analytes? XWere all points generated between the lowest and highest standard used to calculate thecurve?

    X

    Are ICAL data available for all instruments used? XHas the initial calibration curve been verified using an appropriate second source standard? XInitial and continuing calibration verification (ICV and CCV) and continuingcalibration blank (CCB):Was the CCV analyzed at the method-required frequency? XWere percent differences for each analyte within the method-required QC limits? XWas the ICAL curve verified for each analyte? X 4Was the absolute value of the analyte concentration in the inorganic CCB

  • Description Yes No NA(1) NR(2) ER(3)

    Standards documentationAre all standards used in the analyses NIST-traceable or obtained from other appropriatesources?

    X

    Compound/analyte identification proceduresAre the procedures for compound/analyte identification documented? XDemonstration of analyst competency (DOC)Was DOC conducted consistent with NELAC Chapter 5C or ISO/IEC 4? XIs documentation of the analyst’s competency up-to-date and on file? XVerification/validation documentation for methods (NELAC Chap 5 or ISO/IEC17025 Section 5)Are all the methods used to generate the data documented, verified, and validated, whereapplicable?

    X

    Laboratory standard operating procedures (SOPs):Are laboratory SOPs current and on file for each method performed? X

    EXCEPTIONS REPORTER# - Description#1: Toluene-d8 was below the lower control limit in the analyses of samples 01 and 09.#2: Surrogate toluene-d8 was below the lower control limit in the method blank analyzed 10/24/07 on HPMS-11.#3: MTBE exceeded the upper advisory limit in the LCS/LCSD analyzed 10/25/07 on HPMS-10.Methyl acetate and MTBE exceeded the upper advisory limits in the LCS/LCSD analyzed 10/24/07 on HPMS-11.#4: Methyl acetate exceeded the upper control limit in the alternate source analyzed 10/01/07 on HPMS-11.

    Footnotes:(1) NA = Not applicable to method or project(2) NR = Not reviewed(3) ER# = Exception report number

    Page 38

    00101530

  • 2.1 Volatiles Data

    Page 39

    00101531

  • 2.1.1 Volatiles GCMS Data(8260)

    Page 40

    00101532

  • 2.1.1.1 Summary Data

    Page 41

    00101533

  • LABORATORY REPORT

    11/02/07 10:41

    L0710596

    1 OFKEMRON FORMS - Modified 11/30/2005

    11/02/2007 10:41Version 1.5Report generated

    924245PDF File ID:1

    L0710596-01

    L0710596-01

    L0710596-02

    L0710596-02

    L0710596-05

    L0710596-07

    L0710596-08

    L0710596-09

    L0710596-09

    L0710596-10

    L0710596-11

    L0710596-15

    LHSMW56-102007

    LHSMW56-102007

    47WW05-102007

    47WW05-102007

    47WW23-101907

    47WW21-101807

    47WW21-101807-QC

    47WW01-101807

    47WW01-101807

    47WW04-101807

    47WWZZ-101807

    TRIP BLANK

    Client ID Lab ID Dilution

    1

    100

    1

    10

    1

    1

    1

    1

    20

    1

    1

    1

    Sample Analysis Summary

    Date Received

    23-OCT-07

    23-OCT-07

    23-OCT-07

    23-OCT-07

    23-OCT-07

    23-OCT-07

    23-OCT-07

    23-OCT-07

    23-OCT-07

    23-OCT-07

    23-OCT-07

    23-OCT-07

    Attention: Larry Duty

    Account Name: Shaw E & I, Inc.ABB Lummus Biulding3010 Briarpark Drive Suite 4NHouston, TX 77042

    Account Number:Work ID:

    2773LHAAD

    P.O. Number: 322255 OP

    Submitted By

    For

    KEMRON Environmental Services

    156 Starlite Drive

    Marietta OH 45750,

    740 373 4071)( -

    Method

    8260B

    8260B

    8260B

    8260B

    8260B

    8260B

    8260B

    8260B

    8260B

    8260B

    8260B

    8260B

    Page 42

    00101534

  • KEMRON ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICESL0710596

    November 2, 2007

    Report Number:

    Report Date :

    1 of 24

    L0710596-01Sample Number: HPMS11Instrument:

    11M46864File ID:10/24/2007Run Date:Analyst:10/01/2007 15:48Cal Date:

    16:23Workgroup Number:Matrix: Analytical Method:Water

    LHSMW56-102007Client ID:

    Sample Tag:01Dilution:

    Units:

    WG2536788260BMES1ug/L

    Collect Date:10/20/2007 08:10

    Prep Method:5030B 10/24/2007 16:23Prep Date:

    1,1,1-Trichloroethane

    1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane

    1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-Trifluoroethane

    1,1,2-Trichloroethane

    1,1-Dichloroethane

    1,1-Dichloroethene

    1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene

    1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane

    1,2-Dibromoethane

    1,2-Dichlorobenzene

    1,2-Dichloroethane

    cis-1,2-Dichloroethene

    trans-1,2-Dichloroethene

    1,2-Dichloropropane

    1,3-Dichlorobenzene

    1,4-Dichlorobenzene

    2-Butanone

    2-Hexanone

    4-Methyl-2-pentanone

    Acetone

    Benzene

    Bromodichloromethane

    Bromoform

    Bromomethane

    Carbon disulfide

    Carbon tetrachloride

    Chlorobenzene

    Chloroethane

    Chloroform

    Chloromethane

    cis-1,3-Dichloropropene

    Cyclohexane

    Dibromochloromethane

    Dichlorodifluoromethane

    Ethyl benzene

    Isopropylbenzene

    Methyl acetate

    Methyl tert-butyl ether

    Methylcyclohexane

    Methylene chloride

    Styrene

    Tetrachloroethene

    Toluene

    trans-1,3-Dichloropropene

    Trichloroethene

    Trichlorofluoromethane

    Vinyl chloride

    Xylenes, Total

    U

    U

    U

    J

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    I

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    J

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    J

    U

    U

    I

    U

    U

    0.250

    0.125

    0.250

    0.250

    0.125

    0.500

    0.200

    1.00

    0.250

    0.125

    0.250

    0.250

    0.250

    0.200

    0.250

    0.125

    2.50

    2.50

    2.50

    2.50

    0.125

    0.250

    0.500

    0.500

    0.500

    0.250

    0.125

    0.500

    0.125

    0.250

    0.250

    0.250

    0.250

    0.250

    0.250

    0.250

    0.250

    0.500

    0.250

    0.250

    0.125

    0.250

    0.250

    0.500

    0.250

    0.250

    0.250

    0.500

    1.00

    1.00

    5.00

    1.00

    1.00

    1.00

    1.00

    5.00

    1.00

    1.00

    1.00

    1.00

    1.00

    1.00

    1.00

    1.00

    10.0

    10.0

    10.0

    10.0

    1.00

    1.00

    1.00

    1.00

    1.00

    1.00

    1.00

    1.00

    1.00

    1.00

    1.00

    5.00

    1.00

    1.00

    1.00

    1.00

    10.0

    5.00

    10.0

    2.00

    1.00

    1.00

    1.00

    1.00

    1.00

    1.00

    1.00

    1.00

    0.835

    46.2

    184

    219

    2.47

    0.543

    0.746

    3560

    33.6

    71-55-6

    79-34-5

    76-13-1

    79-00-5

    75-34-3

    75-35-4

    120-82-1

    96-12-8

    106-93-4

    95-50-1

    107-06-2

    156-59-2

    156-60-5

    78-87-5

    541-73-1

    106-46-7

    78-93-3

    591-78-6

    108-10-1

    67-64-1

    71-43-2

    75-27-4

    75-25-2

    74-83-9

    75-15-0

    56-23-5

    108-90-7

    75-00-3

    67-66-3

    74-87-3

    10061-01-5

    110-82-7

    124-48-1

    75-71-8

    100-41-4

    98-82-8

    79-20-9

    1634-04-4

    108-87-2

    75-09-2

    100-42-5

    127-18-4

    108-88-3

    10061-02-6

    79-01-6

    75-69-4

    75-01-4

    1330-20-7

    Analyte QualResultCAS. Number PQL SDL

    NONEPrePrep Method:

    Page 43

    00101535

  • KEMRON ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICESL0710596

    November 2, 2007

    Report Number:

    Report Date :

    2 of 24

    L0710596-01Sample Number: HPMS11Instrument:

    11M46864File ID:10/24/2007Run Date:Analyst:10/01/2007 15:48Cal Date:

    16:23Workgroup Number:Matrix: Analytical Method:Water

    LHSMW56-102007Client ID:

    Sample Tag:01Dilution:

    Units:

    WG2536788260BMES1ug/L

    Collect Date:10/20/2007 08:10

    Prep Method:5030B 10/24/2007 16:23Prep Date:

    U Not detected at or above adjusted sample detection limitJ The analyte was positively identified, but the quantitation was below the RL* Surrogate or spike compound out of rangeI Semiquantitative result (out of instrument calibration range)

    80

    86

    86

    88

    120

    118

    115

    110

    91.6

    92.5

    89.2

    86.2 *

    1,2-Dichloroethane-d4

    Dibromofluoromethane

    p-Bromofluorobenzene

    Toluene-d8

    Surrogate Lower Upper% Recovery Qual

    NONEPrePrep Method:

    Page 44

    00101536

  • KEMRON ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICESL0710596

    November 2, 2007

    Report Number:

    Report Date :

    3 of 24

    L0710596-01Sample Number: HPMS10Instrument:

    10M59916File ID:10/27/2007Run Date:Analyst:10/18/2007 16:51Cal Date:

    12:28Workgroup Number:Matrix: Analytical Method:Water

    LHSMW56-102007Client ID:

    Sample Tag:DL01Dilution:

    Units:

    WG2540068260BMES100ug/L

    Collect Date:10/20/2007 08:10

    Prep Method:5030B 10/27/2007 12:28Prep Date:

    1,1,1-Trichloroethane

    1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane

    1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-Trifluoroethane

    1,1,2-Trichloroethane

    1,1-Dichloroethane

    1,1-Dichloroethene

    1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene

    1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane

    1,2-Dibromoethane

    1,2-Dichlorobenzene

    1,2-Dichloroethane

    cis-1,2-Dichloroethene

    trans-1,2-Dichloroethene

    1,2-Dichloropropane

    1,3-Dichlorobenzene

    1,4-Dichlorobenzene

    2-Butanone

    2-Hexanone

    4-Methyl-2-pentanone

    Acetone

    Benzene

    Bromodichloromethane

    Bromoform

    Bromomethane

    Carbon disulfide

    Carbon tetrachloride

    Chlorobenzene

    Chloroethane

    Chloroform

    Chloromethane

    cis-1,3-Dichloropropene

    Cyclohexane

    Dibromochloromethane

    Dichlorodifluoromethane

    Ethyl benzene

    Isopropylbenzene

    Methyl acetate

    Methyl tert-butyl ether

    Methylcyclohexane

    Methylene chloride

    Styrene

    Tetrachloroethene

    Toluene

    trans-1,3-Dichloropropene

    Trichloroethene

    Trichlorofluoromethane

    Vinyl chloride

    Xylenes, Total

    U

    U

    U

    U

    J

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    J

    U

    25.0

    12.5

    25.0

    25.0

    12.5

    50.0

    20.0

    100

    25.0

    12.5

    25.0

    25.0

    25.0

    20.0

    25.0

    12.5

    250

    250

    250

    250

    12.5

    25.0

    50.0

    50.0

    50.0

    25.0

    12.5

    50.0

    12.5

    25.0

    25.0

    25.0

    25.0

    25.0

    25.0

    25.0

    25.0

    50.0

    25.0

    25.0

    12.5

    25.0

    25.0

    50.0

    25.0

    25.0

    25.0

    50.0

    100

    100

    500

    100

    100

    100

    100

    500

    100

    100

    100

    100

    100

    100

    100

    100

    1000

    1000

    1000

    1000

    100

    100

    100

    100

    100

    100

    100

    100

    100

    100

    100

    500

    100

    100

    100

    100

    1000

    500

    1000

    200

    100

    100

    100

    100

    100

    100

    100

    100

    44.2

    188

    171

    8740

    35.6

    71-55-6

    79-34-5

    76-13-1

    79-00-5

    75-34-3

    75-35-4

    120-82-1

    96-12-8

    106-93-4

    95-50-1

    107-06-2

    156-59-2

    156-60-5

    78-87-5

    541-73-1

    106-46-7

    78-93-3

    591-78-6

    108-10-1

    67-64-1

    71-43-2

    75-27-4

    75-25-2

    74-83-9

    75-15-0

    56-23-5

    108-90-7

    75-00-3

    67-66-3

    74-87-3

    10061-01-5

    110-82-7

    124-48-1

    75-71-8

    100-41-4

    98-82-8

    79-20-9

    1634-04-4

    108-87-2

    75-09-2

    100-42-5

    127-18-4

    108-88-3

    10061-02-6

    79-01-6

    75-69-4

    75-01-4

    1330-20-7

    Analyte QualResultCAS. Number PQL SDL

    NONEPrePrep Method:

    Page 45

    00101537

  • KEMRON ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICESL0710596

    November 2, 2007

    Report Number:

    Report Date :

    4 of 24

    L0710596-01Sample Number: HPMS10Instrument:

    10M59916File ID:10/27/2007Run Date:Analyst:10/18/2007 16:51Cal Date:

    12:28Workgroup Number:Matrix: Analytical Method:Water

    LHSMW56-102007Client ID:

    Sample Tag:DL01Dilution:

    Units:

    WG2540068260BMES100ug/L

    Collect Date:10/20/2007 08:10

    Prep Method:5030B 10/27/2007 12:28Prep Date:

    U Not detected at or above adjusted sample detection limitJ The analyte was positively identified, but the quantitation was below the RL

    80

    86

    86

    88

    120

    118

    115

    110

    96.8

    99.5

    102

    98.2

    1,2-Dichloroethane-d4

    Dibromofluoromethane

    p-Bromofluorobenzene

    Toluene-d8

    Surrogate Lower Upper% Recovery Qual

    NONEPrePrep Method:

    Page 46

    00101538

  • KEMRON ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICESL0710596

    November 2, 2007

    Report Number:

    Report Date :

    5 of 24

    L0710596-02Sample Number: HPMS11Instrument:

    11M46865File ID:10/24/2007Run Date:Analyst:10/01/2007 15:48Cal Date:

    16:53Workgroup Number:Matrix: Analytical Method:Water

    47WW05-102007Client ID:

    Sample Tag:01Dilution:

    Units:

    WG2536788260BMES1ug/L

    Collect Date:10/20/2007 08:50

    Prep Method:5030B 10/24/2007 16:53Prep Date:

    1,1,1-Trichloroethane

    1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane

    1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-Trifluoroethane

    1,1,2-Trichloroethane

    1,1-Dichloroethane

    1,1-Dichloroethene

    1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene

    1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane

    1,2-Dibromoethane

    1,2-Dichlorobenzene

    1,2-Dichloroethane

    cis-1,2-Dichloroethene

    trans-1,2-Dichloroethene

    1,2-Dichloropropane

    1,3-Dichlorobenzene

    1,4-Dichlorobenzene

    2-Butanone

    2-Hexanone

    4-Methyl-2-pentanone

    Acetone

    Benzene

    Bromodichloromethane

    Bromoform

    Bromomethane

    Carbon disulfide

    Carbon tetrachloride

    Chlorobenzene

    Chloroethane

    Chloroform

    Chloromethane

    cis-1,3-Dichloropropene

    Cyclohexane

    Dibromochloromethane

    Dichlorodifluoromethane

    Ethyl benzene

    Isopropylbenzene

    Methyl acetate

    Methyl tert-butyl ether

    Methylcyclohexane

    Methylene chloride

    Styrene

    Tetrachloroethene

    Toluene

    trans-1,3-Dichloropropene

    Trichloroethene

    Trichlorofluoromethane

    Vinyl chloride

    Xylenes, Total

    U

    U

    J

    U

    U

    J

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    J

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    I

    U

    U

    U

    0.250

    0.125

    0.250

    0.250

    0.125

    0.500

    0.200

    1.00

    0.250

    0.125

    0.250

    0.250

    0.250

    0.200

    0.250

    0.125

    2.50

    2.50

    2.50

    2.50

    0.125

    0.250

    0.500

    0.500

    0.500

    0.250

    0.125

    0.500

    0.125

    0.250

    0.250

    0.250

    0.250

    0.250

    0.250

    0.250

    0.250

    0.500

    0.250

    0.250

    0.125

    0.250

    0.250

    0.500

    0.250

    0.250

    0.250

    0.500

    1.00

    1.00

    5.00

    1.00

    1.00

    1.00

    1.00

    5.00

    1.00

    1.00

    1.00

    1.00

    1.00

    1.00

    1.00

    1.00

    10.0

    10.0

    10.0

    10.0

    1.00

    1.00

    1.00

    1.00

    1.00

    1.00

    1.00

    1.00

    1.00

    1.00

    1.00

    5.00

    1.00

    1.00

    1.00

    1.00

    10.0

    5.00

    10.0

    2.00

    1.00

    1.00

    1.00

    1.00

    1.00

    1.00

    1.00

    1.00

    3.16

    0.702

    6.44

    0.277

    677

    71-55-6

    79-34-5

    76-13-1

    79-00-5

    75-34-3

    75-35-4

    120-82-1

    96-12-8

    106-93-4

    95-50-1

    107-06-2

    156-59-2

    156-60-5

    78-87-5

    541-73-1

    106-46-7

    78-93-3

    591-78-6

    108-10-1

    67-64-1

    71-43-2

    75-27-4

    75-25-2

    74-83-9

    75-15-0

    56-23-5

    108-90-7

    75-00-3

    67-66-3

    74-87-3

    10061-01-5

    110-82-7

    124-48-1

    75-71-8

    100-41-4

    98-82-8

    79-20-9

    1634-04-4

    108-87-2

    75-09-2

    100-42-5

    127-18-4

    108-88-3

    10061-02-6

    79-01-6

    75-69-4

    75-01-4

    1330-20-7

    Analyte QualResultCAS. Number PQL SDL

    NONEPrePrep Method:

    Page 47

    00101539

  • KEMRON ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICESL0710596

    November 2, 2007

    Report Number:

    Report Date :

    6 of 24

    L0710596-02Sample Number: HPMS11Instrument:

    11M46865File ID:10/24/2007Run Date:Analyst:10/01/2007 15:48Cal Date:

    16:53Workgroup Number:Matrix: Analytical Method:Water

    47WW05-102007Client ID:

    Sample Tag:01Dilution:

    Units:

    WG2536788260BMES1ug/L

    Collect Date:10/20/2007 08:50

    Prep Method:5030B 10/24/2007 16:53Prep Date:

    U Not detected at or above adjusted sample detection limitJ The analyte was positively identified, but the quantitation was below the RLI Semiquantitative result (out of instrument calibration range)

    80

    86

    86

    88

    120

    118

    115

    110

    94.8

    93.3

    90.0

    88.6

    1,2-Dichloroethane-d4

    Dibromofluoromethane

    p-Bromofluorobenzene

    Toluene-d8

    Surrogate Lower Upper% Recovery Qual

    NONEPrePrep Method:

    Page 48

    00101540

  • KEMRON ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICESL0710596

    November 2, 2007

    Report Number:

    Report Date :

    7 of 24

    L0710596-02Sample Number: HPMS10Instrument:

    10M59917File ID:10/27/2007Run Date:Analyst:10/18/2007 16:51Cal Date:

    13:00Workgroup Number:Matrix: Analytical Method:Water

    47WW05-102007Client ID:

    Sample Tag:DL01Dilution:

    Units:

    WG2540068260BMES10ug/L

    Collect Date:10/20/2007 08:50

    Prep Method:5030B 10/27/2007 13:00Prep Date:

    1,1,1-Trichloroethane

    1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane

    1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-Trifluoroethane

    1,1,2-Trichloroethane

    1,1-Dichloroethane

    1,1-Dichloroethene

    1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene

    1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane

    1,2-Dibromoethane

    1,2-Dichlorobenzene

    1,2-Dichloroethane

    cis-1,2-Dichloroethene

    trans-1,2-Dichloroethene

    1,2-Dichloropropane

    1,3-Dichlorobenzene

    1,4-Dichlorobenzene

    2-Butanone

    2-Hexanone

    4-Methyl-2-pentanone

    Acetone

    Benzene

    Bromodichloromethane

    Bromoform

    Bromomethane

    Carbon disulfide

    Carbon tetrachloride

    Chlorobenzene

    Chloroethane

    Chloroform

    Chloromethane

    cis-1,3-Dichloropropene

    Cyclohexane

    Dibromochloromethane

    Dichlorodifluoromethane

    Ethyl benzene

    Isopropylbenzene

    Methyl acetate

    Methyl tert-butyl ether

    Methylcyclohexane

    Methylene chloride

    Styrene

    Tetrachloroethene

    Toluene

    trans-1,3-Dichloropropene

    Trichloroethene

    Trichlorofluoromethane

    Vinyl chloride

    Xylenes, Total

    U

    U

    J

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    J

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    2.50

    1.25

    2.50

    2.50

    1.25

    5.00

    2.00

    10.0

    2.50

    1.25

    2.50

    2.50

    2.50

    2.00

    2.50

    1.25

    25.0

    25.0

    25.0

    25.0

    1.25

    2.50

    5.00

    5.00

    5.00

    2.50

    1.25

    5.00

    1.25

    2.50

    2.50

    2.50

    2.50

    2.50

    2.50

    2.50

    2.50

    5.00

    2.50

    2.50

    1.25

    2.50

    2.50

    5.00

    2.50

    2.50

    2.50

    5.00

    10.0

    10.0

    50.0

    10.0

    10.0

    10.0

    10.0

    50.0

    10.0

    10.0

    10.0

    10.0

    10.0

    10.0

    10.0

    10.0

    100

    100

    100

    100

    10.0

    10.0

    10.0

    10.0

    10.0

    10.0

    10.0

    10.0

    10.0

    10.0

    10.0

    50.0

    10.0

    10.0

    10.0

    10.0

    100

    50.0

    100

    20.0

    10.0

    10.0

    10.0

    10.0

    10.0

    10.0

    10.0

    10.0

    2.53

    6.02

    759

    71-55-6

    79-34-5

    76-13-1

    79-00-5

    75-34-3

    75-35-4

    120-82-1

    96-12-8

    106-93-4

    95-50-1

    107-06-2

    156-59-2

    156-60-5

    78-87-5

    541-73-1

    106-46-7

    78-93-3

    591-78-6

    108-10-1

    67-64-1

    71-43-2

    75-27-4

    75-25-2

    74-83-9

    75-15-0

    56-23-5

    108-90-7

    75-00-3

    67-66-3

    74-87-3

    10061-01-5

    110-82-7

    124-48-1

    75-71-8

    100-41-4

    98-82-8

    79-20-9

    1634-04-4

    108-87-2

    75-09-2

    100-42-5

    127-18-4

    108-88-3

    10061-02-6

    79-01-6

    75-69-4

    75-01-4

    1330-20-7

    Analyte QualResultCAS. Number PQL SDL

    NONEPrePrep Method:

    Page 49

    00101541

  • KEMRON ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICESL0710596

    November 2, 2007

    Report Number:

    Report Date :

    8 of 24

    L0710596-02Sample Number: HPMS10Instrument:

    10M59917File ID:10/27/2007Run Date:Analyst:10/18/2007 16:51Cal Date:

    13:00Workgroup Number:Matrix: Analytical Method:Water

    47WW05-102007Client ID:

    Sample Tag:DL01Dilution:

    Units:

    WG2540068260BMES10ug/L

    Collect Date:10/20/2007 08:50

    Prep Method:5030B 10/27/2007 13:00Prep Date:

    U Not detected at or above adjusted sample detection limitJ The analyte was positively identified, but the quantitation was below the RL

    80

    86

    86

    88

    120

    118

    115

    110

    99.1

    101

    98.9

    96.5

    1,2-Dichloroethane-d4

    Dibromofluoromethane

    p-Bromofluorobenzene

    Toluene-d8

    Surrogate Lower Upper% Recovery Qual

    NONEPrePrep Method:

    Page 50

    00101542

  • KEMRON ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICESL0710596

    November 2, 2007

    Report Number:

    Report Date :

    9 of 24

    L0710596-05Sample Number: HPMS10Instrument:

    10M59859File ID:10/25/2007Run Date:Analyst:10/18/2007 16:51Cal Date:

    12:40Workgroup Number:Matrix: Analytical Method:Water

    47WW23-101907Client ID:

    Sample Tag:01Dilution:

    Units:

    WG2537948260BMES1ug/L

    Collect Date:10/19/2007 09:45

    Prep Method:5030B 10/25/2007 12:40Prep Date:

    1,1,1-Trichloroethane

    1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane

    1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-Trifluoroethane

    1,1,2-Trichloroethane

    1,1-Dichloroethane

    1,1-Dichloroethene

    1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene

    1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane

    1,2-Dibromoethane

    1,2-Dichlorobenzene

    1,2-Dichloroethane

    cis-1,2-Dichloroethene

    trans-1,2-Dichloroethene

    1,2-Dichloropropane

    1,3-Dichlorobenzene

    1,4-Dichlorobenzene

    2-Butanone

    2-Hexanone

    4-Methyl-2-pentanone

    Acetone

    Benzene

    Bromodichloromethane

    Bromoform

    Bromomethane

    Carbon disulfide

    Carbon tetrachloride

    Chlorobenzene

    Chloroethane

    Chloroform

    Chloromethane

    cis-1,3-Dichloropropene

    Cyclohexane

    Dibromochloromethane

    Dichlorodifluoromethane

    Ethyl benzene

    Isopropylbenzene

    Methyl acetate

    Methyl tert-butyl ether

    Methylcyclohexane

    Methylene chloride

    Styrene

    Tetrachloroethene

    Toluene

    trans-1,3-Dichloropropene

    Trichloroethene

    Trichlorofluoromethane

    Vinyl chloride

    Xylenes, Total

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    0.250

    0.125

    0.250

    0.250

    0.125

    0.500

    0.200

    1.00

    0.250

    0.125

    0.250

    0.250

    0.250

    0.200

    0.250

    0.125

    2.50

    2.50

    2.50

    2.50

    0.125

    0.250

    0.500

    0.500

    0.500

    0.250

    0.125

    0.500

    0.125

    0.250

    0.250

    0.250

    0.250

    0.250

    0.250

    0.250

    0.250

    0.500

    0.250

    0.250

    0.125

    0.250

    0.250

    0.500

    0.250

    0.250

    0.250

    0.500

    1.00

    1.00

    5.00

    1.00

    1.00

    1.00

    1.00

    5.00

    1.00

    1.00

    1.00

    1.00

    1.00

    1.00

    1.00

    1.00

    10.0

    10.0

    10.0

    10.0

    1.00

    1.00

    1.00

    1.00

    1.00

    1.00

    1.00

    1.00

    1.00

    1.00

    1.00

    5.00

    1.00

    1.00

    1.00

    1.00

    10.0

    5.00

    10.0

    2.00

    1.00

    1.00

    1.00

    1.00

    1.00

    1.00

    1.00

    1.00

    71-55-6

    79-34-5

    76-13-1

    79-00-5

    75-34-3

    75-35-4

    120-82-1

    96-12-8

    106-93-4

    95-50-1

    107-06-2

    156-59-2

    156-60-5

    78-87-5

    541-73-1

    106-46-7

    78-93-3

    591-78-6

    108-10-1

    67-64-1

    71-43-2

    75-27-4

    75-25-2

    74-83-9

    75-15-0

    56-23-5

    108-90-7

    75-00-3

    67-66-3

    74-87-3

    10061-01-5

    110-82-7

    124-48-1

    75-71-8

    100-41-4

    98-82-8

    79-20-9

    1634-04-4

    108-87-2

    75-09-2

    100-42-5

    127-18-4

    108-88-3

    10061-02-6

    79-01-6

    75-69-4

    75-01-4

    1330-20-7

    Analyte QualResultCAS. Number PQL SDL

    NONEPrePrep Method:

    Page 51

    00101543

  • KEMRON ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICESL0710596

    November 2, 2007

    Report Number:

    Report Date :

    10 of 24

    L0710596-05Sample Number: HPMS10Instrument:

    10M59859File ID:10/25/2007Run Date:Analyst:10/18/2007 16:51Cal Date:

    12:40Workgroup Number:Matrix: Analytical Method:Water

    47WW23-101907Client ID:

    Sample Tag:01Dilution:

    Units:

    WG2537948260BMES1ug/L

    Collect Date:10/19/2007 09:45

    Prep Method:5030B 10/25/2007 12:40Prep Date:

    U Not detected at or above adjusted sample detection limit

    80

    86

    86

    88

    120

    118

    115

    110

    102

    103

    99.2

    97.6

    1,2-Dichloroethane-d4

    Dibromofluoromethane

    p-Bromofluorobenzene

    Toluene-d8

    Surrogate Lower Upper% Recovery Qual

    NONEPrePrep Method:

    Page 52

    00101544

  • KEMRON ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICESL0710596

    November 2, 2007

    Report Number:

    Report Date :

    11 of 24

    L0710596-07Sample Number: HPMS10Instrument:

    10M59860File ID:10/25/2007Run Date:Analyst:10/18/2007 16:51Cal Date:

    13:11Workgroup Number:Matrix: Analytical Method:Water

    47WW21-101807Client ID:

    Sample Tag:01Dilution:

    Units:

    WG2537948260BMES1ug/L

    Collect Date:10/18/2007 14:20

    Prep Method:5030B 10/25/2007 13:11Prep Date:

    1,1,1-Trichloroethane

    1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane

    1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-Trifluoroethane

    1,1,2-Trichloroethane

    1,1-Dichloroethane

    1,1-Dichloroethene

    1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene

    1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane

    1,2-Dibromoethane

    1,2-Dichlorobenzene

    1,2-Dichloroethane

    cis-1,2-Dichloroethene

    trans-1,2-Dichloroethene

    1,2-Dichloropropane

    1,3-Dichlorobenzene

    1,4-Dichlorobenzene

    2-Butanone

    2-Hexanone

    4-Methyl-2-pentanone

    Acetone

    Benzene

    Bromodichloromethane

    Bromoform

    Bromomethane

    Carbon disulfide

    Carbon tetrachloride

    Chlorobenzene

    Chloroethane

    Chloroform

    Chloromethane

    cis-1,3-Dichloropropene

    Cyclohexane

    Dibromochloromethane

    Dichlorodifluoromethane

    Ethyl benzene

    Isopropylbenzene

    Methyl acetate

    Methyl tert-butyl ether

    Methylcyclohexane

    Methylene chloride

    Styrene

    Tetrachloroethene

    Toluene

    trans-1,3-Dichloropropene

    Trichloroethene

    Trichlorofluoromethane

    Vinyl chloride

    Xylenes, Total

    U

    U

    U

    U

    J

    J

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    U

    0.250

    0.125

    0.250

    0.250

    0.125

    0.500

    0.200

    1.00

    0.250

    0.125

    0.250

    0.250

    0.250

    0.200

    0.250

    0.125

    2.50

    2.50

    2.50

    2.50

    0.125

    0.250

    0.500

    0.500

    0.500

    0.250

    0.125

    0.500

    0.125

    0.250

    0.250

    0.250

    0.250

    0.250

    0.250

    0.250

    0.250

    0.500

    0.250

    0.250

    0.125

    0.250

    0.250

    0.500

    0.250

    0.250

    0.250

    0.500

    1.00

    1.00

    5.00

    1.00

    1.00

    1.00

    1.00

    5.00

    1.00

    1.00

    1.00

    1.00

    1.00

    1.00

    1.00

    1.00

    10.0

    10.0

    10.0

    10.0

    1.00

    1.00

    1.00

    1.00

    1.00

    1.00

    1.00

    1.00

    1.00

    1.00

    1.00

    5.00

    1.00

    1.00

    1.00

    1.00

    10.0

    5.00

    10.0

    2.00

    1.00

    1.00

    1.00

    1.00

    1.00

    1.00

    1.00

    1.00

    0.161

    0.566

    1.99

    2.61

    71-55-6

    79-34-5

    76-13-1

    79-00-5

    75-34-3

    75-35-4

    120-82-1

    96-12-8

    106-93-4

    95-50-1

    107-06-2

    156-59-2

    156-60-5

    78-87-5

    541-73-1

    106-46-7

    78-93-3

    591-78-6

    108-10-1

    67-64-1

    71-43-2

    75-27-4

    75-25-2

    74-83-9

    75-15-0

    56-23-5

    108-90-7

    75-00-3

    67-66-3

    74-87-3

    10061-01-5

    110-82-7

    124-48-1

    75-71-8

    100-41-4

    98-82-8

    79-20-9

    1634-04-4

    108-87-2

    75-09-2

    100-42-5

    127-18-4

    108-88-3

    10061-02-6

    79-01-6

    75-69-4

    75-01-4

    1330-20-7

    Analyte QualResultCAS. Number PQL SDL

    NONEPrePrep Method:

    Page 53

    00101545

  • KEMRON ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICESL0710596

    November 2, 2007

    Report Number:

    Report Date :

    12 of 24

    L0710596-07Sample Number: HPMS10Instrument:

    10M59860File ID:10/25/2007Run Date:Analyst:10/18/2007 16:51Cal Date:

    13:11Workgroup Number:Matrix: Analytical Method:Water

    47WW21-101807Client ID:

    Sample Tag:01Dilution:

    Units:

    WG2537948260BMES1ug/L

    Collect Date:10/18/2007 14:20

    Prep Method:5030B 10/25/2007 13:11Prep Date:

    U Not detected at or above adjusted sample detection limitJ The analyte was positively identified, but the quantitation was below the RL

    80

    86

    86

    88

    120

    118

    115

    110

    100

    102

    96.6

    93.9

    1,2-Dichloroethane-d4

    Dibromofluoromethane

    p-Bromofluorobenzene

    Toluene-d8

    Surrogate Lower Upper% Recovery Qual

    NONEPrePrep Method:

    Page 54

    00101546

  • KEMRON ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICESL0710596

    November 2, 2007

    Report Number:

    Report Date :

    13 of 24

    L0710596-08Sample Number: HPMS11Instrument:

    11M46869File ID:10/24/2007Run Date:Analyst:10/01/2007 15:48Cal Date:

    18:55Workgroup Number:Matrix: Analytical Method:Water

    47WW21-101807-QCClient ID:

    Sample Tag:01Dilution:

    Units:

    WG2536788260BMES1ug/L

    Collect Date:10/18/2007 14:20

    Prep Method:5030B 10/24/2007 18:55Prep Date:

    1,1,1-Trichloroethane

    1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane

    1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-Trifluoroethane

    1,1,2-Trichloroethane

    1,1-Dichloroethane

    1,1-Dichloroethene

    1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene

    1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropro


Top Related