

Supplementary Data
Table 1. IC50 values (M) of gefitinib (A) and erlotinib (B) toward wild type and L858R EGFR. After
starvation, cells were preincubated with different concentrations of gefitinib or erlitinib for 30 minutes and then
stimulated with 100 ng/ml EGF for 2 minutes. Cell lysates were run on SDS-PAGE and receptor
phosphorylation at different tyrosine residues were detected by western blotting with specific phospho-EGFR
antibodies. In order to determine the concentration of kinase inhibitor (gefitinib or erlotinib) that resulted in 50% EGFR activity (IC50), the data were fitted to the following equation. Percent activity = (activitymax*IC50) / (IC50 + [kinase inhibitor]) + constant.
A.
B.
tyrosine residues wild type L858R
845 0.083 0.029 0.013 ± 0.002
992 0.020 0.002 0.018 0.003
1045 0.019 0.002 0.008 0.001
1068 0.074 0.022 0.054 0.015
1148 0.071 0.013 0.016 0.001
1173 0.037 0.006 0.010 0.002
tyrosine residues wild type L858R
845 0.150 0.046 0.005 0.001
992 0.015 0.002 0.010 0.001
1045 0.015 0.001 0.003 0.0002
1068 0.059 0.018 0.035 0.004
1148 0.034 0.003 0.018 0.004
1173 0.025 0.003 0.006 0.0006

Table 2. IC50 (M) of gefitinib (A) and erlotinib (B) toward downstream signaling proteins in 32D cells. After
starvation, cells were preincubated with different concentrations of gefitinib for 30 minutes and then stimulated
with 100 ng/ml EGF for 2 minutes. Cell lysates were run on SDS-PAGE and various EGFR signaling proteins
were detected by western blotting with total and phospho-antibodies. In order to determine the concentration of kinase inhibitor (gefitinib or erlotinib) that resulted in 50% EGFR activity (IC50), the data were fitted to the following equation. Percent activity = (activitymax*IC50) / (IC50 + [kinase inhibitor]) + constant.
A.
**shows no inhibition up to indicated concentrations of gefitinib
32D wild type 32D L858R Fold-difference
pCbl 0.05 0.007 0.0015 0.0002 33
pERK 0.84 0.24 0.019 0.009 44
pAKT 0.47 0.16 0.023 0.011 20
pPLC- 0.78 0.05 0.0048 0.0010 163
pSTAT3 0.0061 0.0009
0.00087 0.00038 7
pSrc 0.042 0.011 > 0.5** <0.1
pPI3K 0.46 0.10 > 0.5** <1
pSTAT5 0.64 0.54 0.0024 0.0011 267
B.
32D wild type 32D L858R Fold-difference
pCbl 3.74 0.36 0.013 0.0033 288
pERK 1.08 0.25 0.012 0.006 90
pAKT 0.92 0.22 0.028 0.013 33
pPLC- 0.13 0.02 0.008 0.002 16
pSTAT3 0.017 0.003 0.025 0.009 1
pSrc 4.12 5.58 > 0.5** <8
pPI3K 0.16 0.13 > 0.5** <0.3
pSTAT5 0.068 0.033 0.0038 0.0005 18

**shows no inhibition up to indicated
concentrations of erlotinib
Table 3. IC50 (M) of
gefitinib (A) and
erlotinib (B) toward
downstr
eam signaling proteins in cancer cell lines. After starvation, cells were preincubated with different
concentrations of gefitinib for 30 minutes and then stimulated with 100 ng/ml EGF for 2 minutes. Cell lysates
were run on SDS-PAGE and various EGFR signaling proteins were detected by western blotting with total and
phospho-antibodies. In order to determine the concentration of kinase inhibitor (gefitinib or erlotinib) that resulted in 50% EGFR activity (IC50), the data were fitted to the following equation. Percent activity = (activitymax*IC50) / (IC50 + [kinase inhibitor]) + constant.
A.
A431 H3255 Fold-difference
pCbl 0.016 0.0052 0.00016 0.00003 100
pERK 0.041 0.031 0.0015 0.0018 27
pAKT 0.10 0.077 0.0037 0.00003 27
pPLC- 0.046 0.014 0.0049 0.0052 9
pSTAT3 0.028 0.0087 0.0052 0.010 5
pSrc > 1** > 0.04**
pSTAT5 0.035 0.030 0.0080 0.017 4

**shows no inhibition up to indicated concentrations of gefitinib
A431 H3255 Fold-difference
pCbl 0.043 0.030 0.0012 0.00079 36
pERK 0.0045 0.0037 0.00032 0.00011 14
pAKT 0.10 0.16 0.0017 0.001 59
pPLC- 0.071 ± 0.003 0.0021 0.00088 34
pSTAT3 0.21 0.049 > 0.04** < 5
pSrc > 1.0** > 0.04**
pSTAT5 0.021 0.0075 0.000052±0.00001 404
B.
**shows no inhibition up to indicated concentrations of erlotinib

Figure 1. (A) Effect of gefitinib on activation of EGFR signaling proteins in 32D cells. (B) Effect of erlotinib on
activation of EGFR signaling proteins in 32D cells. After serum starvation, cells were preincubated with the
indicated concentrations of gefitinib for 30 minutes and then stimulated with 100 ng/ml EGF for 2 minutes. Cell
lysates were run on SDS-PAGE and various EGFR signaling proteins were detected by western blotting with
total and phospho-antibodies.
(A)
pAKT
AKT
pERK
ERK
pPLC-
PLC-
pSTAT3
STAT3
gefitinib (M)pSrc
Src
wild type L834R
pCbl
pPI3K
Cbl
gefitinib (M)
wild type L834R
PI3K
pSTAT5
STAT5
(B)
erlotinib (M)
pAKT
AKT
pERK
ERK
pPLC-
PLC-
pSTAT3
STAT3
pSrc
Src
wild type L834R
pCbl
pPI3K
Cbl
erlotinib (M)
wild type L834R
PI3K
pSTAT5
STAT5

Figure 2. (A) Effect of gefitinib on activation of EGFR signaling proteins in cancer cells. (B) Effect of erlotinib
on activation of EGFR signaling proteins in cancer cells. After serum starvation, cells were preincubated with
the indicated concentrations of gefitinib for 30 minutes and then stimulated with 100 ng/ml EGF for 2 minutes.
Cell lysates were run on SDS-PAGE and various EGFR signaling proteins were detected by western blotting
with total and phospho-antibodies.
(A)
pAKT
AKT
pERK
ERK
pPLC-
PLC-
pSTAT3
STAT3
gefitinib (M)pSrc
Src
A431 H3255
pCbl
Cbl
A431 H3255
pSTAT5
STAT5
gefitinib (M)
(B)
erlotinib (M)
pAKT
AKT
pERK
ERK
pPLC-
PLC-
pSTAT3
STAT3
pSrc
Src
pCbl
Cbl
erlotinib (M)
pSTAT5
STAT5
A431 H3255 A431 H3255