Download - Measuring T&D 1
MEASUREMENT OF TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENTBy group-3
execu
tive b
atch
20
09
-10
WHAT TRAINING REFERS TO It is a learning process that involves the acquisition of
knowledge, sharpening of skills, concepts, rules or changing of attitudes and behaviours to enhance the performance of employee.
Training is activity leading to skilled behavior.
-it’s not what you want in life, but its knowing how to reach it.
Training is about knowing where you stand ( no
matter how good or bad the current situation looks) at present and you will be after some point of time.
execu
tive b
atch
20
09
-10
2
OBJECTIVES OF TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT The principal objectives of training and development
division is to make sure the availability of a skilled and willing workforce to an organization.
Individual objectives – help employee in achieving their personal goals ,which in turn enhance the individual contribution to an organization.
Organizational objectives- assist the organization with its primary objective by bringing individual objectives.
Functional objectives- maintain the department’s contribution at a level suitable to the organization’s needs.
Societal objectives- ensure that an organization is ethically and socially responsible to the needs and challenge of the society.
execu
tive b
atch
20
09
-10
3
WHY MEASURING?
Measurement of learning is one of the best ways for trainers to choose the most effective teaching methods.
The investment of time and money there should be a return greater than the investment.
To know the followings:-
- How well did someone learn?
- How effectively did he or she apply the learning, most importantly from a business standpoint?
- What difference did it make to the business imperatives?
execu
tive b
atch
20
09
-10
4
KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT At knowledge praxis, we define knowledge management
as a business activity with two primary aspects-
-Treating the knowledge component business activities as an explicit concern of business reflected in strategy ,policy and practice at all levels of the organization.
-Making the direct connection between an organizational assets- both explicit (recorded) and tacit(personal know how) – and positive business result.
KM can be broken into four steps:-
-Collect information
-Organize it
-Disseminate it
-Evaluate its utility
execu
tive b
atch
20
09
-10
5
KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING PRACTICES
It yields four types of improvements:-
Cost reduction by reducing time away from work to learn.
Improved quality through finding errors earlier in the process.
Reduced risk and uncertainty by focusing investment in activities with a higher probability of success.
Improved technology transfer by sharing insights within the community on how to do something and thus cutting time to learn on one’s own.
execu
tive b
atch
20
09
-10
6
STAGES IN DEVELOPING A KMOL WITH EVALUATION OF EACH STAGE Vision
To convince others that there can be improvements in productivity , quality or service. Benchmarking within the industry or region can be an effective tool for making the case.
Strategy
The process of turning the vision into reality takes place.
Offering people an opportunity to come together around a common interest .
Expansion
Comparison of previous internal performance levels as well as to external benchmarks. Show quantitative returns on investment like reduction in cost, improvement in customer retention , increased sales etc.
execu
tive b
atch
20
09
-10
7
CONTD.
Institutionalization Top management must be very visible in its
support. Funding as well as personal involvement, is
necessary. Climate assessment is necessary. “Balanced Scorecard” can be developed. T&D SCORECARD.xlsm
execu
tive b
atch
20
09
-10
8
IC MATRICS
Learning : Hours of training per Headcount Percent of staff in company sponsored
education Invested dollars per Headcount in T&D
K containment Rate: Percent of Key staff with more than X years in position.
Organization Capacity: Average number of years of education per employee.
Diversity: Percent of exempt positions held by members of affected classes.
execu
tive b
atch
20
09
-10
9
KM MACRO METRICS
HCVA: Revenue – Purchased services per FTE HCROI: Ratio of profit to Remuneration per FTE HEVA:NOPAT- Capital Cost per FTE HMVA: Market value- Book value per FTE
KM PROCESS METRICS Innovation: Percent of revenue from new products R&D
expenditure as percent of sales. Drag: Span of control(employees per supervisor)
Cost to supervise, No. of employees self service on intranet, G&A cost as a percent of sales.
Team effectiveness: Percent of team projects that achieve their objectives.
Outsource Factor: Percent of G&A services outsourced(payroll, maintenance , IT etc.
execu
tive b
atch
20
09
-10
10
MEASURING THE EFFECT OF T & D
Three general measures of training :- Cost : expense per unit of training delivered. Change: gain in skill or knowledge or positive
change in attitude by the trainee. Impact : results or outcomes from the trainee’s
use of new skills , knowledge or attitude that are measurable in monetary terms in the organization’s productivity, quality or service result.
execu
tive b
atch
20
09
-10
11
TRAINING COST FACTOR
TCF=(CC+TR+S+RC+TL+TS+PS+OH)/PT
TCF= cost per trainee CC= consultant cost TR= training facility rental S= supplies , workbooks, paper and pencils RC= refreshments TL= travel and lodging for trainees and trainers TS= trainers’ salaries and benefit PS= participants’ salaries and benefits OH= training department overhead PT= number of people trained
execu
tive b
atch
20
09
-10
12
TRAINING COST PER HOUR
TCH=TC/TH
TCH= training cost per hour TC= total cost of training TH= total training hours(number trained x hours of
training) Compare the program costs between internal and
external sources. Mostly it depends on the following:- The scale of the program? Is this a common topic or a special topic? Will there be travel involved?
execu
tive b
atch
20
09
-10
13
INPUT ANALYSIS
It is a systemic method of identifying and comparing the many costs involved in two or more training programs.
Inputs, in
Rupees
people material equipment
facilities total
Diagnosis
Design
Development
Delivery
Evaluation
Total
execu
tive b
atch
20
09
-10
14
KNOWLEDGE CHANGE
KC= KA/KB KC= knowledge change KA= knowledge level after training KB= knowledge level before training
Skill (Behaviour) Change CS=SA/SB
SC= observable change in skills as a result of training.
SA= skill demonstrated after training by work output , critical incidents of interpersonal relations, or other observable phenomena.
SB= skill level existing before the training , using the criteria above.
execu
tive b
atch
20
09
-10
15
ATTITUDE CHANGE
AC=AA/AB AC= attitude change AA=Attitude after training AB= attitude before training
Performance Change PC=PA/PB PC=change in work performance as measured by
the organization’s performance appraisal system. PA= latest review rating or score from a performance
appraisal conducted at least 90 days after the training
PB= performance review score or traning from the performance appraisal conducted before the training.
execu
tive b
atch
20
09
-10
16
VALUE ANALYSIS
It consist of four steps: Situational analysis:-study the business problem
or opportunity looking for its sources and the factors and forces driving it.
Intervention:- if training is deemed to be part of the solution , design and deliver it in a skill form that is visibly linked with the business problem.
Impact:-when the data on performance change are in, did performance change?
Value:- calculation of the value of the impact in monetary and, if applicable , human terms.
execu
tive b
atch
20
09
-10
17
DEVELOPING AND MEASURING LEADERSHIP
Peter Koestenbaum’s simple model divided into two aspects-
Authenticity:- invisible ,inherent character. Competence
Leadership Metrics Leaders depends on followers , without followers there is
no leader. Behavior of a leader include some of the following:- Provides an exciting vision for others to follow Outlines a strategy and makes a commitment to it Describes a preferred corporate culture Acts in accordance with the culture Is consistent in word and behavior Treats all people with respect Acts ethically Develops talent
execu
tive b
atch
20
09
-10
18
MEASUREMENT OF BDAL
BDAL-Business Driven Action Learning Yuri Boshyk described BDAL change
company’s strategy and behavior of its people. Five key elements of BDAL:-
Involvement and support of senior executives. Work on real business issues exploration of new
strategic opportunities. Action research focus on internal and external
business experience. Leadership development through teamwork. Implementation of recommendations and follow
up on the issues.
execu
tive b
atch
20
09
-10
19
THE NEW LOOK OF EMPLOYEE DEVELOPMENT
Traditional approach: Job or Organization and Employee view point
Tried to fit people to the job or job to the people
Three issues for better career development First need to understand the business Second development requirement is interpersonal
skills Analytical ability
execu
tive b
atch
20
09
-10
20
THE DEVELOPMENT TREND Specific development is becoming more prized Quality, productivity and service issue can be solved
cost-effectively Shift toward self directed and self-paced development Employees must take active role in self development
Development Process Formation of career development team:
First, a representative of line management must be included from the area we plan for servicing
Representation from HR, Staffing and career development Trainer who will design and deliver
Selection of Target development area E.g: Develop people in customer service area Select people based on the feedback from managers and
customer
execu
tive b
atch
20
09
-10
21
CAREER DEVELOPMENT MEASURES One way to measure career development is to view the job-
posting system as a career development activity
First thing we can show management is the volume of applicants and placements handled each month
Second issue cost per placement. How much we save the organization through internal placement
Third important issue is retention
execu
tive b
atch
20
09
-10
22
ORGANIZATIONAL SHIFTS
Career Path Ration
CPR =
CTR =
Where CPR= Career Promotion Ratio CTR= Career Transfer Ration p= number of employee receiving a
promotion T= number of employee transferred
P + T
P
T
P + T
execu
tive b
atch
20
09
-10
23
ORGANIZATIONAL DEVELOPMENT
Organizational Development: Past and Future 1980 Organizational Development evolves
from the touchy-feely, humanistic psychology 1990. OD took on more practical face. It is
actively partnering, creating and guiding change management process
OD practitioners are helping organization to modify the business strategy, determine the gaps between current condition and desired future state
execu
tive b
atch
20
09
-10
24
ORGANIZATIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND THE ORGANIZATION
OD is an effort: Planned Organization wide Managed from the top Increase organization effectiveness and health
through Planned inventions in the organization process,
using behavior science knowledge
execu
tive b
atch
20
09
-10
25
OD OPPORTUNITIES Benchmarking, Reengineering and other forms
of process improvement can use OD skillsWHY OD IS NOT QUANTITATIVELY
EVALUATED First, some feel that since evaluation is not
demanded in past why offer it now People do not know how to measure beyond
basic production and financial variables Many people including some OD people do not
want to measure People don’t want to accept the constraints
imposed by science and business impose Zealous, so don’t want to speak OD in business
terms
execu
tive b
atch
20
09
-10
26
MEASURE OF EFFECTIVENESS FOR ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT
Six Factors: Short Term
Productivity Quality service
Intermediate Responsiveness Development
Long Term Survival
execu
tive b
atch
20
09
-10
27
ENTERPRISE FACTOR Productivity Quality Service Responsiveness Development Survival Subsystem Productivity Quality Service Change measure Scorecarding Value Chain
execu
tive b
atch
20
09
-10
28
Thank You
execu
tive b
atch
20
09
-10
29